Auburn Home In Waconia

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 37 beds and averages 34.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.05 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-04-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident advance directives were accurately documented to reflect the resident's current wishes which affected 1 of 16 residents (R29) reviewed for advanced directives. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R29 who would have received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), contrary to their wishes, in the absence of a pulse or respirations. The IJ began on [DATE], when R29's updated physician's order for life sustaining treatment (POLST) signed on [DATE], identified R29's wishes of do not resuscitate (DNR). The three ring household binder and staff report form identified R29's wishes of CPR. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on [DATE], at 3:35 p.m. The IJ was removed on [DATE], at 12:33 p.m., when the facility had implemented corrective action, however non-compliance remained at the lower scope and severity level of D, isolated with no actual harm but potential to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered monitoring for potential adverse effects related to antipsychotic medication use was completed when orthostatic blood pressures (BP) were not obtained as ordered for 1 of 3 residents (R7) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medication use.Findings included:R7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R7 had moderately impaired cognition, and diagnoses included chronic diastolic heart failure (a condition where the heart does not fill properly, which may affect blood flow), hypertension (high blood pressure), anxiety disorder, and depression. The MDS further identified R7 received antipsychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant, and diuretic medications.R7's physician orders, print date of 6/18/26 , identified an order for Olanzapine 5 milligrams (mg) by mouth two times daily for psychosis related to depression, with target behaviors including anxiety, apathy, and somatic symptoms (physical symptoms related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented infection prevention and control practices when staff failed to wear required personal protective equipment (PPE), including gowns and gloves, during high-contact resident care activities for 1 of 1 resident (R4) reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP).Findings include:R4's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R4 had intact cognition, and diagnoses included benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; enlarged prostate which may affect the ability to empty the bladder), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; chronic lung disease that affects breathing), severe protein-calorie malnutrition (lack of adequate nutrition which may affect the body's ability to heal and fight infections), and weakness (decreased strength which may affect mobility and ability to complete daily activities). The MDS further identified R4 required an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-25 · tag F0712 — pattern
  Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a physician performed an initial comprehensive assessment within 30 days after admission for 1 of 3 residents (R3), failed to ensure physician visits every 30 days after admission for 90 days for 1 of 3 residents (R3) and failed to ensure physician visits every 60 days after the initial 90 days for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R3). Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was admitted [DATE]. R1 was cognitively intact with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease (a movement disorder of the nervous system that often causes constipation related to slow movement of food through the gut and reduced physical activity), required a wheelchair for mobility, and substantial/ maximum assistance [helper does more than half the effort] from staff for mobility.R1's progress notes dated 7/21/25 at 3:31 a.m., indicated discharge on [DATE].R1's provider visits for 2025 included nurse practitioner (NP) visits monthly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to timely update the family member (FM) of a change in condition for 1 of 3 residents (R1) to allow family to be involved in decisions for the resident's end of life care.Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was cognitively intact with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease (a movement disorder of the nervous system), required a wheelchair for mobility, and substantial/ maximum assistance [helper does more than half the effort] from staff for mobility. R1's progress notes dated 7/21/25 at 12:47 a.m., indicated R1 was nauseated, vomited green fluid, was short of breath, had blood pressure of 72/32 and then 87/57, pain in the right upper quadrant rated as 7 on a scale of 0-10, and a fever of 100.3 degrees Fahrenheit. The on-call administrative staff was notified, and staff left a voice message for the nurse practitioner (NP) were notified, but the progress note lacked indication R1's family was notified.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was updated to include interventions to address constipation and a bowel program for 1 of 3 residents (R1), who had periods of three or four days between documented bowel movements. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was cognitively intact with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease (a movement disorder of the nervous system that often causes constipation related to slow movement of food through the gut and reduced physical activity), required a wheelchair for mobility, and substantial/ maximum assistance [helper does more than half the effort] from staff for mobility. R1's orders dated 9/24/24, indicated senna-docusate (medication used to relieve constipation, also known as MiraLAX) oral tablet 8.6 milligram (mg), give 2 tablets by mouth in the morning for constipation and give 2 tablets by mouth as needed for constipation, up to 2 times a day. Further, R1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility delayed the transfer to the hospital after a change of condition, 1 of 3 residents (R1) who had a change in condition. R1's change of condition was identified at approximately 12:45 a.m. and was sent to the hospital at 3:30.Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was cognitively intact with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease (a movement disorder of the nervous system that often causes constipation related to slow movement of food through the gut and reduced physical activity), required a wheelchair for mobility, and substantial/ maximum assistance [helper does more than half the effort] from staff for mobility. R1 had chronic pain rated typically at 3 on a scale of 0-10. R1's progress notes dated 7/21/25 at 12:47 a.m., indicated R1 was nauseated, vomited green fluid, was short of breath, had blood pressure of 72/32 and then 87/57, pain in the right upper quadrant rated as 7 on a scale of 0-10 (severe pain),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure grievance forms and procedures were posted in prominent locations throughout the facility for residents and resident representatives to file grievances, and anonymously if desired for 4 of 4 residents (R18, R16, R19, and R7) reviewed for grievances. Findings include: On 3/31/25 at 11:00 a.m., a resident council meeting was held with four residents which included R18, R16, R19, and R7. During the resident council meeting, all four residents indicated they were unaware of how to file a grievance. During an observation on 3/31/25 at 12:00 p.m., the surveyor could not locate grievance forms throughout the facility. During a joint interview on 4/1/25 at 12:35 p.m., the administrator and director of nursing (DON) both confirmed the grievances were kept in the social service office. During an interview on 3/31/25 at 2:38 p.m., social services director (SSD) confirmed there were grievances in her office and was unable to locate grievances that were posted in prominent locations for the residents or resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly labeled and dated after packaging was opened and were disposed of after the expiration date to prevent cross contamination. In addition, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen area. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 32 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings Include: During an initial tour of the kitchen and kitchenettes on 3/31/25 at 2:10 p.m., with dietary manager (DM)-A, the following areas of concern were identified: -walk in refrigerator; one large metal pan of fruit crisp, and a tray of fruit cups were covered and not dated. DM-A indicated they should have been dated and applied dated stickers to each item. -stainless steel cupboards had smears, spots and fingerprints inside and outside the doors. The stainless-steel counter below and across the Robot Coupe on the counter multiple various size crumbs were noted. DM-A indicated they did not use the Robot Coupe at this time. -Elm/Island Pantry kitchenette fridge…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn to prevent the spread of infection for for 1 of 4 residents (R25) observed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities). In addition, the facility failed to ensure safe delivery of beverages during the dining observation. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 32 residents who resided in the facility. Findings Include: PPE: Review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance dated 4/1/24, Implementation of PPE Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs) indicated Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring gown and glove use for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) included: Dressing, Bathing/showering, Transferring, Providing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-02 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to establish a process for antibiotic review in order to determine appropriate indications for use of an antibiotic for 1 of 1 resident (R15) reviewed for antibiotic use. Findings include: R15's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R15 had intact cognition with diagnoses of chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation. The MDS further identified R15 required supervision with setup help for activities of daily living (ADL's). R15's physician's orders and oncology notes were requested and not received. R15's medication administration record (MAR) dated 3/2025, included the following medication but lacked diagnoses or ongoing need for use: -Bactrim DS 800-160 milligrams (mg). Give one tablet by mouth in the morning every Monday, Wednesday, Friday for due to high dose of steroids. Bactrim order initiated 1/15/25. During an interview on on 4/2/25 at 12:58 p.m., RN-B verified R15 had been receiving Bactrim DS 800-160…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,513 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $10,513 — penalty dated 2025-04-02
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-02 for 41 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN