Parkview Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 30 beds and averages 21.7 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.08 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.17 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.29 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess, monitor, timely develop and revise a care plan, and follow physician-ordered treatments for a surgical wound for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for non-pressure related skin injuries. The facility's failures resulted in actual harm, as evidenced by documented deterioration of R1's surgical wound from partial to complete dehiscence, with measurable increases in wound depth and tunneling, increased pain, and the need for ongoing treatments. Findings include: R1's face sheet dated 1/29/26, identified diagnoses of malignant neoplasm (cancer) of the anal canal. R1's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], identified R1 had been hospitalized from [DATE] through 1/2/26 for a planned robotic-assisted abdominoperineal resection (a major surgery removing that anus, rectum, and part of the sigmoid colon) with a permanent colostomy. R1's hospital After Visit Summary dated 1/2/26, included the following post procedure after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to monitor, comprehensively assess, develop, and implement individualized interventions to prevent/mitigate the risk of pressure ulcers to /or deterioration for 2 of 3 residents (R2, R3) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This resulted in actual harm for R2 who developed an unstageable pressure ulcer on her right heel and stage 3 pressure ulcer on sacrum. Findings include: Pressure Ulcer/Injury (PU/PI) is localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. The injury occurs because of intense and/or prolonged pressure or pressure in combination with shear. Stage 1 Pressure Injury: Non-blanchable erythema of intact skin. Intact skin with a localized area of non-blanchable erythema (redness). Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer: Partial thickness skin loss of skin with exposed dermis, presenting as a shallow open ulcer. The wound bed is viable, pink, or red, moist, and may also…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess, monitor, and provide interventions to prevent pressure ulcer development, promote healing, and prevent deterioration for 1 of 3 residents (R3) who had pressure ulcers. The facility's failures resulted in harm when R3 developed a stage 2 pressure ulcer (PU) that deteriorated to a stage 3. Findings include: STAGING Staging of a PU/PI is performed to indicate the characteristics and extent of tissue injury, and should be conducted according to professional standards of practice. Determining whether damage to the skin and underlying tissue is a PI or PU depends on the staging of the damaged tissue. Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer: Partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis Partial-thickness loss of skin with exposed dermis, presenting as a shallow open ulcer. The wound bed is viable, pink or red, moist, and may also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister. Adipose (fat) is not visible and deeper tissues are not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-04 · tag F0825 — pattern
  Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide physical therapy and occupational therapy as ordered for 5 of 5 residents (R2, R8, R13, R25, R26) reviewed for rehabilitation and restorative services. Findings include: R2's face sheet printed 6/4/26, indicated diagnoses of acute heart failure, chronic pain syndrome, and kidney disease. R2's care plan dated 2/17/26, indicated acute and chronic pain related to lower leg ulcers and chronic pain syndrome with interventions of non-medicated pain relief measures such as massage, physical therapy, and strengthening and stretching exercises. R2's physician's orders dated 5/29/26, indicated occupational and physical therapy eval and treat. R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, rejection of care one to three days, use of wheelchair, dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. R8's face sheet printed 6/4/26, indicated diagnoses of dysphagia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-07 · tag F0568 — pattern
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate accounting records of resident personal funds for 10 of 10 residents (R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R12, R9, R11) whose funds were maintained in a commingled facility trust account. Findings include:The facility provided resident trust statements for all the residents who had given the facility to manage. The trust statements only had the balance with no accounting of credits or debits from the account. Further the trust statements did not identify and/or account for interest earned if any. R17's trust statement dated 4/3/26, identified a balance of $94.73.R18's trust statement dated 4/3/26, identified a balance of $85.00.R19's trust statement dated 4/3/26, identified a balance of $1,899.11.R20's trust statement dated 4/3/26, identified a balance of $100.00.R21's trust statement dated 4/3/26, identified a balance of $349.00.R22's trust statement dated 4/3/26, identified a balance of $100.00.R23's trust statement dated 4/3/26, identified a balance of ($15.00). This indicated the balance was negative.R12's trust statement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to notify the physician of recurrent refusals of physician ordered medication for 1 of 1 residents (R21) who required lactulose for treatment and management of constipation and hepatic failure/alcoholic cirrhosis. Findings include R21's face sheet dated 4/3/26, identified diagnoses of chronic hepatic failure without coma, and alcoholic cirrhosis of liver without ascites.R21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R21 had no cognitive impairment. R21 rejected cares 1-3 days.R21's care plan dated 9/4/25, identified R12 had diagnoses of constipation and is at risk for constipation when refuses medication for constipation, is receiving laxatives-Lactulose and MiraLAX for management related to diagnoses of cirrhosis of liver. Will refuse other medications for bowels. Interventions included administer medications as ordered. Document if he refuses. Encourage R21 to sit on toilet to evacuate bowels if possible. Follow facility protocol for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to revise behavioral care plan after resident-to-resident altercation for 1 of 1 resident (R11) reviewed for abuse. In addition, the facility failed to revise the care plan to reflect ongoing pattern of medication refusals for 1 of 1 resident (R21) who was prescribed a clinically significant medication used to treat a diagnosis of cirrhosis/hepatic failure. Findings include:R11's face sheet dated 4/2/26, identified diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease with late onset, anxiety disorder, mild cognitive impairment, and blindness of right eye.R11's physician order dated 6/12/24, identified to monitor and note behavior in progress note of irritability, verbal aggression, stating he feels down or blue, not visiting with others, walking the halls, and not eating.R11's physician order dated 6/8/25, identified to check R11's room daily for weapons such as scissors, knives, forks, etc. after recent episodes of aggression.R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed ensure comprehensive assessments for appropriate sling sizes for full body mechanical lift according to manufacturer guidelines to ensure safe transfers to mitigate the risk of injury for 2 of 2 residents (R16, R10) reviewed for safety.Findings include:R16R16's face sheet dated 4/2/26, identified diagnoses of encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, and muscle weakness.R16's admission MDS dated [DATE], identified R16 had severe cognitive impairment. R16 was dependent on staff for dressing, rolling, and transfers. R16 did not move from sitting to lying, lying to sitting, or sitting to standing.R16's Baseline Care Plan dated 2/5/26, identified R16 required staff assistance to transfer but did not identify how the transfer would be accomplished.R16's care plan dated 3/3/26, identified R16 required a mechanical lift with assist of two people for transfers. R16's care plan did not identify sling size to use prior to start of survey.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to revise the care plan for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) who were reviewed for non-pressure skin concerns and pressure ulcers. Findings includeR1's face sheet dated 1/29/26, identified diagnoses of malignant neoplasm (cancer) of the anal canal. R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors of rejection of care, was independent with bed mobility, needed set up or clean up assistance for transfers, had a recent surgery that required active skilled nursing facility care that involved the gastrointestinal tract, had a surgical wound that did not have any surgical wound care. R1's activity of daily living (ADL) focus care plan dated 1/11/26, identified R1 had a self-care performance deficit related to gastrointestinal surgery. Goal to improve current level of functioning in ADLs. Interventions for transfers dated 1/11/26 as follows: R2 able to transfer with one staff and front wheeled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and document review the facility failed to ensure proper handwashing/hand hygiene was implemented for 1 of 3 residents (R4) observed for handwashing/hand hygiene during wound care. Findings include:R4's face sheet dated 2/4/26, identified diagnoses of chronic venous hypertension with ulcer, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, and atrial fibrillation. R4's Baseline Care Plan dated 1/30/26, identified R2 had venous stasis ulcer to bilateral lower extremities. R4's hospital after visit summary dated 1/28/26, identified R4 had orders for wound care to bilateral lower extremities to cleanse with normal saline or wound cleanser, apply nonadherent dressing to any open areas, cover with ABD pads, and secure with Kerlix. R4's physician orders dated 1/29/26, identified an order to bilateral lower extremities to cleanse with normal saline or wound cleanser, apply nonadherent dressing to open areas then cover with ABD pads and secure with kerlix. During an observation and interview dated 1/30/26 at 10:23 a.m., assistant director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure plates, trays, and plate covers were completely dry before storing, and failed to ensure refrigerated food was disposed of timely to prevent bacterial growth and foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all 18 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During initial kitchen observation on 6/23/25 at 6:25 p.m., dietary aide (DA)-A was washing dishes. Clean plates, serving trays, and plate covers were lined up air drying near the dishwasher. During observation and interview on 6/23/25 at 7:00 p.m., DA-A had put all dishes away. DA-A was asked to lift two plates, two serving trays, and two plate covers from where they were placed stacked on top of each other on shelves without space between them to allow drainage or air drying. All plates, serving trays, and plate covers observed had visible water droplets on them. DA-A stated she always put dishes away prior to leaving her shift and thought they were dry when she put them away. During further initial kitchen observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to report the potential theft of money to the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 1 resident (R6) reviewed for personal property. Findings include: R6's face sheet received on 6/25/25, included diagnoses of anxiety and depression. R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, clear speech, could understand and be understood. No indication of psychosis and no behaviors. R6 was dependent upon staff for most activities of daily living. R6's care plan dated 9/28/23, indicated R6 was at risk for potential abuse, neglect, or exploitation from others. R6 would remain free of documented reports of abuse. Staff would report any physical signs, comments by resident, family members of suspected abuse, neglect or exploitation of resident immediately to their supervisor or other entity as needed. During an interview on 6/23/25 at 7:28 p.m., R6 stated she lost $100 in cash about a month ago. R6 stated, I made the mistake of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to investigate the potential theft of money for 1 of 1 resident (R6) reviewed for personal property. Findings include: R6's face sheet received on 6/25/25, included diagnoses of anxiety and depression. R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, clear speech, could understand and be understood. No indication of psychosis and no behaviors. R6 was dependent upon staff for most activities of daily living. R6's care plan dated 9/28/23, indicated R6 was at risk for potential abuse, neglect, or exploitation from others. R6 would remain free of documented reports of abuse. Staff would report any physical signs, comments by resident, family members of suspected abuse, neglect or exploitation of resident immediately to their supervisor or other entity as needed. During an interview on 6/23/25 at 7:28 p.m., R6 stated she lost $100 in cash about a month ago. R6 stated, I made the mistake of trusting people. R6 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-29 for 11 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN