Lake Winona Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 63.9 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.28 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.18 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.49 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the turning and repositioning care plan requiring assist of two staff for 1 of 3 residents (R1) which resulted in actual harm when R1 fell off the bed sustaining a right tibia and fibula fracture, and a distal end of left femur fracture. The facility had put corrective measures in place on 11/13/25, prior to the start of the survey, therefore, was issued at past non-compliance Findings include: R1's face sheet dated 12/17/25, identified diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (disease that causes numbness, weakness, trouble walking, vision issues, etc.), fracture of upper end of right tibia (fracture just below the knee), fracture of lower end of left femur (lower part of thigh bone), and anxiety. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 was able to understand and make self-understood to others, had no cognitive deficits, no behaviors, impairments on both sides of upper and lower extremities, dependent on staff for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medication assessment (SAM) was completed for 1 of 1 resident (R8) reviewed for self-administration of medication.Findings include:R8's Quarterly Minimum Dat Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/10/26 indicated R8 was cognitively intact. Further, R8 was independent with eating and basic personal hygiene and dependent on facility staff for mobility and transfers.R8's record lacked an assessment to self-administer medications.During observation and interview on 3/2/26 at 7:01 p.m., a Voltaren Gel (pain relief) tube was observed sitting in a basket on R8's tray table. R8 stated he used the Voltaren Gel on both his knees when he had pain. R8 stated he would use the gel throughout the day and is unsure how many times per day.R8 lacked an order for Voltaren Gel. During observation and interview on 3/4/26 at 8:54 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A was observed administering R8's morning medications. The Voltaren Gel remained in the basket on R8's tray table. R8 again stated, he uses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and document review the facility failed to ensure proper food safety practices when food service workers (FSW-A and FSW-B) were observed not having hair secured, not properly disinfecting food thermometer, not recognizing need to reheat food when needed, and touching food with contaminated gloves. This practice had the potential to affect all 65 residents who received meals from 2 of 2 dining rooms observed. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 12/2/24 at 5:04 p.m., in the second-floor dining room, observed FSW-A standing behind the steam table preparing to plate food for the evening meal. FSW-A's hair which was long and curly, had not been fully secured in his hairnet -- all hair below the level of his ears was outside of the hairnet. FSW-A was asked not to proceed and to secure his hair. FSW-A stated he would try and left the dining room. FSW-A returned a few minutes later and his hair was still not fully secure. He tucked the rest of his hair into the hairnet, washed his hands and donned gloves. During an observation on 12/2/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented for 3 of 3 residents (R27,R24,R58) reviewed for wounds, and proper donning and doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE) was completed per standard guidelines for 2 of 3 residents (R20,R27). Findings include: R20's facesheet printed on 12/5/24, included diagnosis of chronic foot ulcer. R20's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated R20 was cognitively intact; was usually understood and could understand. R20 was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living (ADL), and had a stage 2 pressure ulcer on her foot. R20's care plan dated 10/4/24, indicated impaired skin integrity related to left foot pressure ulcer and enhanced barrier precautions were in place. During an observation on 12/2/24 at 2:38 p.m., in hallways on the north and south units on second floor, PPE carts and doffing receptacles (metal stands with blue garbage bags) were observed lining the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess wounds including measurements weekly for 1 of 3 residents (R24) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: R24's facesheet printed 12/5/24, included diagnoses of severe dementia, difficulty in walking, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). R24's quarterly minimum data set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R24 had severely impaired cognitive decision making skills, disorganized thinking and inattention constantly present. R24 required substantial to maximum assist with bed mobility and dependent on staff for wheelchair mobility. R24 did not have a pressure ulcer but was identified at risk of pressure ulcer development and had a pressure reducing device in wheelchair. R24's physician orders dated 10/15/24, included left heel wound: Cut to fit Aquacel Ag (sterile dressing to cover wounds that excrete fluids and includes antimicrobial) to the wound bed, cover with 4x4 Allevyn gentle border foam…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and document review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive, person-centered care plan, to promote fecal continence to the extent possible that is dignified, and per resident choice for 1 of 2 residents (R34) who were reviewed for bowel incontinence. Findings include: R34's minimum data set set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R34 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicated moderate cognitive impairment. R34 required extensive assistance for mobility, transfers, and toileting. R34 had a diagnosis of diarrhea. R34 did not have an active bowel program to manage bowel continence. R34's care plan dated 10/9/2024 did not include bowel care interventions or a bowel management regimen. R34 required a two-wheeled walker, gait belt, and assist of one for transfers. R34's physician orders did not address bowel diagnosis and incontinence care and prevention. During observation on 12/2/24 1:57 p.m., R34 stated he has a full depends (disposable product used for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure side rails were comprehensively assessed to determine if they were appropriate and safe, discuss risks and benefits, and obtain informed consent prior to use of bed rails for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R27, R38), who were observed to have assist bars raised on their beds. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents who utilized an assist bar(s) for mobility. Findings include: R1's facesheet printed on 12/5/24, included diagnoses of spastic cerebral palsy and osteoarthritis. R1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated moderately impaired cognition, clear speech, could understand and be understood. R1 was dependent upon staff for activities of daily living, including rolling from side to side in bed, transferring and toileting. R1 was not able to move from lying in bed to sitting on the edge of the bed. R1's care plan dated 4/12/23, indicated R1 required assistance of two staff and a Hoyer lift…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene and glove use practices were maintained for 1 of 1 resident (R1) observed during peri care and full body lift transfer. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1's diagnoses included non-traumatic brain dysfunction including dementia. MDS identified R1 was usually understood and usually able to understand others. However, the cognitive patterns indicated R1 was rarely or never understood and had severe cognitive impairment with fluctuating behaviors present. In addition, R1's MDS identified R1 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R1's care plan revised on 1/31/24, indicated R1 needed assist of 2 staff with toileting using a full body lift due to safety concerns with the use of the standing lift. Staff to provide peri hygiene and apply barrier cream with cares. During an observation on 3/7/24 at 12:59 p.m., nursing assistant (NA)-A and NA-B…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-10-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure continued monitoring and surveillance for efficacy and appropriateness was completed for 2 of 2 residents (R7, R20) who were on long-term, prophylactic antibiotics. In addition, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate antibiotic was administered for 1 of 1 (R9) residents who had an infected wound and were prescribed an ineffective antibiotic. Findings include: R7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R7 had severe cognitive deficits and had diagnoses that included diabetes, epilepsy, morbid obesity, and urinary tract infections (UTI's). R7's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 3/28/23, indicated R7 triggered for indwelling catheter, cognitive loss/dementia, and pressure ulcers. R7's care plan dated 8/17/23, indicated R7 had a self-care deficit related to alteration in urinary/bowel function. Interventions included monitoring void patterns, assess for a UTI, administering medications as ordered and observing for side…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a private meeting place without staff present for resident council meetings. In addition the facility failed to ensure concerns brought forward at the resident council meetings were addressed in a timely manner. This deficiency had the potential to affect all 13 residents who attended the monthly resident council meetings. Findings include: During an interview with resident council members, R3, R12, R55, R48, and R46 on 10/25/23 at 1:00 p.m., residents indicated resident council meetings were held in the open dining room and provided no privacy. The residents stated staff being present was intimidating and There are times you hate to bring up concerns in front of staff. Residents also stated follow up regarding their concerns was not there and things didn't often change. During an observation on 10/25/23 at 1:54 p.m., 13 residents, two family members and five staff members were gathered in the resident main dining room for the resident council meeting. The main dining room is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to keep remote to chair within reach for 1 of 1 residents (R31) reviewed for possible restraint. Findings include: R31's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R31 had severely impaired cognition and required moderate staff assistance to transfer and walk, extensive assistance to stand, and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. The MDS indicated a bed alarm was used for R31's care. R31's Face Sheet dated 10/24/22, indicated R31 was diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, arthritis, and osteoporosis (a condition causing weak, brittle bones that are much more likely to break). R31's care plan dated 4/12/23, indicated R31 had a risk for falls, and to intervene, staff should ensure R31's recliner remote was not tucked into the recliner seat but left on the side of the chair. During an observation on 10/24/23 at 12:46 p.m., R31 sat in the recliner on the right side of her room with the leg rest in the extended…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN