No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ascend At Aurora

1700 South Hudson Avenue, Aurora, MO 65605 · For profit - Corporation · 125 certified beds · (417) 678-2165 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$46,940 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $46,940 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-12)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
721 E Highland St · (417) 308-2278 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3020 S Elliott Ave · (417) 678-6006 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
708 S Elliott Ave · (417) 678-0493 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1617 S Porter Ave · (417) 678-3883

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased30.6%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.7%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.5%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.6%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.6%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication31.1%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.1%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.6%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table33.9%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication14.0%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%63.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission5.6%26.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.5%13.7%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

12.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.2%CMS range 8.0–19.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.57
RN hours/ resident / day
0.65
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.02
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.24
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
54.4%
Total nursing turnover
57.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 55.5 residents a day — about 44% occupied, or roughly 70 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.02 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.46 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-04-12)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2022-05-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #48), who is non-verbal and dependent on staff for all personal needs and mobility, was free from mental abuse by staff when one staff member, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) S, purposely made comments to the resident to upset him/her. The resident was visually upset when discussing the CNA and the comments made to him/her, including becoming red faced, teary eyed, reaching out his/her arm and grunting. A sample of 26 residents was reviewed in a facility with a census of 60. On 2/8/24, SLCR completed a complaint investigation at the facility regarding an allegation of the resident not being treated with dignity and was unable to verify deficient practice occurred. A reinvestigation began during the recertification survey. As a result of the findings of the investigation, the Administrator was notified on 04/10/24, at 6:26 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). The IJ was removed on 04/11/2024, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free of significant medication errors when staff administered a fentanyl patch (a narcotic patch placed on the skin to treat moderate to severe pain) and hydrocodone-APAP (narcotic that is used for relief of severe pain) to one resident (Resident #162) without orders, resulting in significant side effects and hospitalization. A sample of 26 residents was reviewed in a facility with a census of 60. The Administrator was notified on 04/11/24, at 2:28 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 01/31/24. The resident went to the hospital and did not readmit to the facility. The IJ was removed on 04/12/24 as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration, dated 07/12/13, showed the following: -Administer medications to residents in a safe and timely fashion; -Observe for drug reactions; -Chart on medication record dose, time given, and any pertinent observations. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Monitoring Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice to promote prevention and healing of pressure ulcers (refers to localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) pressure ulcers when the facility failed to timely assess, document, and implement treatment and monitoring of a pressure ulcer for two resident (Resident #3 and #4). The facility census was 53.Review of the facility policy titled Skin Integrity- Pressure and Non-Pressure reviewed 06/30/25, showed the following information:-Pressure and other ulcers will be assessed and measured at least weekly by a licensed nurse and documented;-A skin condition assessment and pressure ulcer risk assessment will be completed at the time of admission. The pressure ulcer risk assessment will be updated quarterly and as necessary;-Residents identified will have a weekly skin assessment by a licensed nurse. A wound assessment will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received and the facility provided food to accommodate resident allergies when the facility failed to ensure residents were not served foods they were allergic to, failed to care plan resident allergies, and failed to enter resident allergies into the physician orders for one resident (Resident #1) out of 6 sampled residents. The facility census was 53.Review of the facility policy titled Food Allergies and Intolerances, reviewed on 10/01/25, showed the following information:-Residents are assessed for history of food allergies upon admission as part of the comprehensive assessment;-All resident reported allergies are documented in the medical record;-Severe food allergies are noted on the resident's profile and communicated in writing directly to the dietitian and the director of food and nutrition services;-Meals for residents with severe food allergies are prepared so that cross-contamination with allergens does not occur;-Residents with allergies are offered appropriate substitutions for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from misappropriation of property when staff could not account for two residents' (Resident #1 and #2) cards of controlled medications (narcotics) that had been in the possession of the facility. The facility census was 60.The Administrator and former Director of Nursing (DON) were notified on 11/23/25 of the missing medications. The facility completed an audit of resident medications, completed in-servicing of licensed staff who were involved in medication pass and medication storage, and notified families and physicians of the missing medications. The noncompliance was corrected 11/26/25. Review of the facility's policy Identifying Exploitation, Theft and Misappropriation of Resident Property, dated October 2025 showed the following:-As part of the abuse prevention strategy, volunteers, employees and contractors hired by this facility are expected to be able to recognize exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of misappropriation of property were reported within 24 hours to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services-DHSS) when staff failed to report timely when they discovered two missing cards of narcotics for two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2). The facility census was 60. The Administrator and former Director of Nursing (DON) were notified on 11/23/25 of the missing medications. It was discovered on 11/26/25 are report to DHSS had not been made. The facility completed in-servicing of staff and audits of records. The noncompliance was corrected on 11/26/25. Review of the facility's policy Identifying Exploitation, Theft and Misappropriation of Resident Property, dated October 2025 showed the following:-As part of the abuse prevention strategy, volunteers, employees and contractors hired by this facility are expected to be able to recognize exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property;-Exploitation, theft, and misappropriation of resident property are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to protect each resident's right of self-determination when the facility staff failed to provide routine showers per reasonable preferences of each resident and as care planned for three sampled residents (Residents #1, #2, and #3). The facility census was 54. Review of the facility policy, Your Rights and Protections as a Nursing Home Resident, undated, showed the following:-The resident has the right to be treated with dignity and respect, as well as make to make hi/s/her own schedule and participate in the activities he/she chooses;-The resident has the right to make a complaint to the staff of the nursing home, or any other person, without fear of punishment. The nursing home must address the issue promptly. Review of the facility policy, Resident Rights State and Federal, dated May 2017, showed the following:-The resident had a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete infection prevention and control program when the facility failed to ensure staff posted appropriate signage and failed to ensure staff wore person protective equipment (PPE) in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for residents subject to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - precautions for use during high-contact resident care activities for residents infected with a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO-microorganisms that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents) or any resident who has a chronic wound and/or indwelling medical device) for one resident (Resident #3), of three sampled residents, who had a indwelling medical device. Staff also failed to perform hand hygiene per standard of practice when staff did not perform appropriate hand hygiene during perineal care for three residents (Residents #4, #1, and #2) in a sample of four residents reviewed in a facility with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to designate a registered nurse (RN) to serve as the Director of Nursing (DON) on a full time basis. The facility census was 60. Review of the facility's document titled, Director of Nursing Services job description showed the following: -The primary purpose of the job position is to plan, organize, develop and direct the overall operation of the nursing service department in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern the facility, and as may be directed by the Administrator and the Medical Director to ensure that the highest degree of quality care is maintained at all times; -The Director of Nursing Services (DON) is delegated the administrative authority, responsibility, and accountability necessary for carrying out the assigned duties. In the absence of the Medical Director, the DON is charged with carrying out the resident care policies established by the facility; -Duties and responsibilities include administrative functions, committee functions, personnel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in a manner to protect it from potential contamination when staff failed to date and label stored food in refrigerators; failed to keep non-food contact surfaces clean and free of debris; and failed to sanitize dishes in the three vat sink at the minimum manufacturer's requirements. The facility's census was 60. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Storage - Refrigeration, undated, showed all leftovers shall be labeled and dated with expiration dates. Observation on 04/07/24, at 2:42 P.M., of the reach in refrigerator showed the following: -One individual serving dish of peach pie not covered, labeled, or dated; -One cheese sandwich on a plate, covered and not dated. Observation on 04/07/24, at 2:51 P.M., of the walk-in refrigerator showed the following: -An open container on the top shelf containing four apples and three lemons that were wilted, brown, and not dated; -A serving tray on the top shelf containing 12 individual condiment containers, containing a clear liquid, not labeled;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-12 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and update the comprehensive facility assessment annually, in accordance with all applicable Federal requirements. Failure to review and update the comprehensive facility assessment annually could delay the services needed to care for the residents in day-to-day operations and in emergencies. This failure could affect all facility occupants. The facility census was 60. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding the facility assessment. 1. Review of the facility's assessment, showed the following: -Staff completed the facility assessment in 2020; -Staff did not document review of the facility assessment since 2020. During an interview on 04/12/24, at 2:15 P.M., the Administrator said the following: -She began the position on 04/05/24; -She is responsible for reviewing and completing the facility assessment; -The facility staff should review the facility assessment yearly; -The facility assessment determines resident acuity needs; -The facility assessment determines staffing required for resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective and complete infection control program when staff failed to follow the facility's policy to monitor and prevent the development Legionella bacteria (a bacteria which causes a respiratory disease when breathing in small droplets of water in the air that contain Legionella. It can become a health concern when it grows and spreads in human-made water systems) in the facility's water system. The facility also failed to update policies, educate staff, and implement policies related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions for six residents (Resident #110, #47, #160, #20, #161, and #24) out of a sample of 26 residents. The facility census was 60. 1. Review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Toolkit for Legionella bacteria (officially titled Developing a Water Management Program to Reduce Legionella Growth & Spread in Buildings) showed healthcare facilities need to actively identify and manage hazardous conditions that support…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective and complete antibiotic stewardship program when staff failed to track residents on antibiotics for various infections in the facility by not completing a current and ongoing antibiotic log of residents with active infections. This failure could potentially place all residents at risk of infection. The facility census was 60. Review of the facility's policy, titled 'Infection Prevention and Control Program', dated 2019, showed the following: -The primary mission is to establish and maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections; -It is the policy that this facility's IPCP is based upon information from the facility assessment and follows national standards and guidelines to prevent, recognize, and control the onset and spread of infection whenever possible; -The IPCP includes a system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a facility temperature range of 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and at a comfortable level of the residents in resident rooms and common areas accessible to residents affecting ten residents (Residents #160, #14, #52, #25, #50, #32, #31, #41 ,#35, and #45) out of a sample of 26 residents. The facility census was 60. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding facility heating and cooling system or monitoring of facility temperature for resident comfort. 1. Review of the National Weather Service (website weather.gov) showed on 04/07/24 the high temperature measured 71.6 degrees F. 2. Review of Resident #160's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated comprehensive assessment completed by the facility), dated 04/08/24, showed the following: -admission date of 03/27/24; -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (MS - a long-lasting (chronic) disease of the central nervous system, that impacts the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse prevention policy of screening all staff at hire when the facility failed to request a Criminal Background Checks (CBC) or Family Care Safety Register (FCSR - a database that can provide CBC along with other background checks) check prior to one staff member's (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D) contact with residents. A sample of 10 hired employees was reviewed in a facility with a census of 60. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Policy, dated 2021, showed the following: -The facility's abuse prohibition program includes the following seven components: screening, training, prevention, identification, investigation, protection and reporting/response; -Screening: The facility will not knowingly employ individuals who have been found guilty of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents or misappropriating their properties; -All employees will have criminal background checks, state and federal required checks, employment reference checks (previous and current), and license/certification…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for all residents when staff failed to care plan oxygen use for one resident (Resident #2), failed to care plan smoking safety for one resident (Resident #160), and failed to care plan wound care for one resident (Residents #259). A sample of 26 residents was reviewed in a facility with a census of 60. Review of facility's policy titled, Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team, dated 02/2021, showed the following: -To assess each resident's strengths, weaknesses, and care needs using the Minimum Date Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff); -To use this assessment data to develop a comprehensive plan of care for each resident that will assist resident in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to care plan use of side rails and failed to obtain informed consent for use of side rails for two residents (Resident #6 and #12), and failed to complete gap measurements for installed side rails for three residents (Resident #6, #12, and #23) of a sample of four residents. The facility census was 60. Review of the facility's policy titled, Proper Use of Side Rails, revised December 2016, showed the following: -The purpose of these guidelines is to ensure the safe use of side rails as resident mobility aids and to prohibit the use of side rails as restraints unless necessary to treat a resident's medical symptoms; -Side rails are only permissible if they are used to treat a resident's medical symptoms or to assist with mobility and transfer of resident's; -An assessment will be made to determine the resident's symptoms, risk of entrapment and reason for using side rails. When used for mobility or transfer, an assessment will include a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form to meet residents' needs when staff failed to prepare pureed food to the proper consistency in accordance with professional standards for one resident (Resident #26) out of four residents on a pureed texture diet. The facility census was 60. Review of the facility's policy titled, Meal production - Menu, undated, showed pureed food should not be thinner than pudding or thicker than mashed potatoes. 1. Review of Resident #26's face sheet (resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admission date of 04/03/20; -Diagnoses included senile degeneration of the brain (older individuals who suffered from cognitive decline, particularly memory loss), anxiety, and vitamin A deficiency. Review of the resident's April 2024 Physician Order Summary report showed the following: -An order, dated 03/22/23, for regular diet, pureed texture. Do not change order per physician. Review of the resident's care plan, updated 12/29/23, showed the following: -The resident had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of a transfer or discharge to a hospital, including the reasons for the transfer, for two residents (Resident #21 and #160), out of a sample of 26 residents. The facility census was 60. Review of the facility's document titled, Notification of Transfer or Discharge, undated, showed the following fields to be completed by facility staff: -Date of transfer, date of notice, resident name, and representative name; -Missouri Ombudsman office, address, and phone number; -You are hereby notified of our intent to transfer or discharge the above named resident for the following reason; -Name and address of location which resident will be transferred or discharged to; -Notice to resident regarding right to appeal transfer or discharge; -Person completing transfer/discharge notice; -Person delivering written notice of transfer/discharge and method of delivery. 1. Review of Resident #160's face sheet showed the following information: -admission date of 03/27/24;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to give information to the resident and/or resident's representative of the facility's bed hold policy when two residents (Residents #21 and #160) were transferred to the hospital, out of a sample of 26 residents. The facility census was 60. Review of the facility provided policy, dated February 2014, Bed Hold Policy & Agreement Form, showed the following: -To establish policy and procedure for facility to notify the resident and/or responsible party of the Bed Hold Policy and Agreement to Pay Charges for Bed Hold; -The bed hold agreement is to be obtained for each occurrence - hospital or therapeutic leave; -When hospital or therapeutic leave is reported on the midnight census, the business office will notify the resident and/or responsible party to sign the bed hold agreement; -The business office will address weekend or holiday transfer on the next business day; -When the resident goes to the hospital or out of the facility for overnight visitation the bed may be held by paying the rate as identified in the bed hold…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all dialysis residents received services consistent with professional standards of practice when staff failed to routinely communicate and collaborate with the dialysis (a process of filtering and removing waste products from the bloodstream when the kidneys can no longer sufficiently do so) center after appointments for one resident (Resident #47) out of a sample of two residents. The facility census was 60. Review of the facility's policy titled Dialysis Communication, dated 02/2021, showed the following: -It is the policy of the facility to communicate openly and effectively with any provider of dialysis for a resident of the facility; -The Director of Nursing (DON) or designee will contact dialysis unit to establish the communication and explain the facility will be sending a communication form that will facilitate the sharing of resident information surrounding dialysis; -A dialysis communication form will be used to send information to and from the facility to the dialysis center and back; -The nurse in charge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents received behavioral health care and services to maintain the highest practical psychosocial well-being when the facility failed to care plan and implement resident specific interventions for one resident (Resident #259) who exhibited signs and symptoms of depression. The facility failed to have social services follow-up with the resident when the resident expressed signs of possible depression. The facility census was 60. Review showed the facility did not provide a behavioral health policy. 1. Review of Resident #259's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admission date of 03/18/24; -Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a chronic inflammatory lung disease the causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), congestive heart failure (CHF - a long-term condition in which the heart can't pump blood well enough to meet the body's needs), and encounter for palliative care. Review of a preadmission hospice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days when one resident (Resident #9) had an ongoing order for a psychotropic medication with no physician review and justification. The facility census was 60 residents. Review of the facility's policy Psychotropic Medication Use, dated 02/2021, showed the following: -Residents will only receive psychotropic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions which they are indicated and effective; -Gradual dose reductions of psychotropic medications will be done as outlined per federal regulations. (The policy did not address requirements for psychotropic PRN orders.) 1. Review of Resident #9's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admission date of 01/05/23; -Diagnoses included anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning), dated 03/04/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure all resident pressure ulcers received treatment consistent with standards of practice to prevent possible infection when staff failed to to utilize appropriate infection control measures during wound care for one resident (Resident #1) with two pressure ulcers, one stage 4 pressure ulcer (a full thickness tissue loss wound with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle) and one stage 3 pressure ulcer (a full thickness tissue loss wound potentially extending to the subcutaneous fat layer), when the nurse failed to wash hands and change gloves at appropriate times during observed wound care. The facility census was 65. Review of the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 2019, showed the following: -To establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-05-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment when the kitchen floors in a clean manner when the floors and a drain in front of the tilt skillet were not cleaned. The facility census was 58. Record review of the Nutrition Services for Department Sanitation guideline, revised on January 2021 showed: -The purpose was to ensure a clean and sanitary work environment; to promote and protect food safety; and to maintain compliance with Federal, State, and Local guidelines and regulations governing food sanitation and safety;. -Sanitation shall be maintained in a manner to support procedures for Food Safety. Staff shall be responsible for daily and weekly cleaning assignments as determined by the Dietary Manager and/or his/her designees; -Cleaning assignments shall include all equipment, storage areas, walls, floors and refrigeration units; -Cleaning equipment condensers, lighting fixtures, vents, etc. shall be completed by the Maintenance Department as determined by the Administrator. 1. Observation on 5/2/22, at 10:37 A.M., of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-11 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's choice of code status (the level of medical interventions a resident wishes to have if their heart or breathing stops) was clearly and consistently documented throughout the resident's medical record for three residents (Resident #3, Resident #45 and Resident #105). The facility census was 58. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Advance Directives, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Prior to or upon admission of a resident to the facility, the Social Services Director (SSD) or designee will provide written information to the resident concerning his/her right to make decisions concerning medical care, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment, and the right to formulate advance directives; -Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advance directive shall be placed the medical record; -The plan of care for each resident will be consistent with his or her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep residents who resided in the special care unit (SCU) free from possible harm by not securing hazardous chemicals and other hazardous items and by allowing resident access to a coffee pot with an external hot water spout. Thirteen residents resided on the SCU and the facility census was 58. 1. Record review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to securing hazardous chemicals. Record review of the Safety Data Sheet (SDS - a document that lists information relating to occupational safety and health for the use of various substances and products) for Provon Perineal Wash, dated 7/26/94, showed the following: -May cause eye irritation or gastric upset; -Keep out of reach of children. RecordreviewoftheSDSforGladeSprayLavenderandPeachBlossom revised2/26/15, showedthefollowing -Flammableaerosol -Containedgasunderpressure Mayexplodeifheated -Avoidcontactwithskin eyesandclothing RecordreviewoftheSDSforProConSystemsTurquoise3,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-11 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain written consent for side rail use, failed to complete a documented side rail assessment, failed to monitor and measure bed rails for risk of entrapment , failed to obtain physician orders for use of side rails, and failed to complete a risk versus benefits side rail assessment for four residents (Resident #15, #27, #38 and #40). The facility census was 58. Record review of the facility's policy titled Proper Use of Side Rails, reviewed 01/2017, showed the following: -Side rails are only permissible if they are used to treat a resident's medical symptoms or reason for using side rails; -An assessment will be made to determine the resident's symptoms or reason for using side rails; -The use of side rails as an assistive device will be addressed in the resident care plan; -Less restrictive interventions will be incorporated in care planning; -Documentation will indicate if less restrictive approaches are not successful, prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were protected from possible contamination when the Special Care Unit (SCU) that held snacks and drinks for the residents was kept clean. The facility's census was 58. 1. Observation on 5/4/22, at 12:19 P.M., of the refrigerator in the SCU that held snacks and drinks for the residents showed the following: -Red and brown dried on particles on the middle shelf in the door, the right and left middle shelf, and bottom shelf, inside the drawer on the left inside and bottom pan under the bottom drawers. Observation on 5/5/22, at 7:25 A.M., of the refrigerator in the SCU that held snacks and drinks for the residents showed the following: -Red and brown dried on particles on the middle shelf in the door, the right and left middle shelf and bottom shelf inside, the drawer on the left inside and bottom pan under the bottom drawers. During an interview on 5/5/22, at 9:49 A.M., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A said the following: -Dietary staff cleaned the refrigerator; -The refrigerator not cleaned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer the pneumococcal (pneumonia) vaccine to two residents (Resident #27 and #40), and failed to offer the pneumococcal vaccine to one resident (Resident #35). The facility census was 58. Record review of the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Manual, Resident Immunizations and Vaccinations-Pneumonia Vaccine Program, showed the following: -It is the policy of this facility that residents will be offered immunizations against pneumococcal disease; -Pneumococcal disease is a serious illness that can cause sickness and even death; -There are two pneumococcal vaccines available for use in the United States, 13 valent pneumoni conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23); -The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for the Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommends that the two vaccines be given in a series to immunocompromised adults [AGE] years of age or older; -The ACIP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed criminal background checks (CBCs) and Nurse Aide (NA) Registry (registry which shows if someone has a Federal Indicator (indicates individuals who had a previous incident involving abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property that would prevent the employee from working in a certified long-term care facility ) checks for two employees (Dietary Aide (DA) F and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) G). The facility census was 58. Record review of the facility's Abuse Policy, revised November 2018, showed the following: -The facility will not knowingly employ individuals who have been found guilty of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents or misappropriating their properties; -All employees will have criminal background checks, state and federal required checks, employment reference checks (previous or current) and license/certification confirmation; -The facility will make reasonable efforts to uncover information about any past criminal prosecutions; -The facility will report any knowledge it has of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-11 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a federally mandated preliminary assessment to determine whether a resident may have a mental illness (MI) or an intellectual disorder (ID), to determine the level of care needed) for one sampled resident (Resident #8) out of a sample of 23 residents. The facility census was 58. Record review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding the completion of PASRRs. 1. Record review of Resident #8's face sheet (admission data) showed the following: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -readmitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital; -Diagnoses included unspecified convulsions, essential hypertension (high blood pressure), and unspecified mood (affective) disorder. Record review of the resident's medical record showed staff did not complete the required level one PASSR screening when the resident admitted to the facility. Record review of the resident's care plan, dated 4/18/21,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents received care per the facility's policies and procedures and resident's care plan, when staff failed to accurately monitor and document resident bowel movements (BM) resulting in staff not administering laxatives as ordered for one resident (Resident #32). The facility had a census of 55. Record review of the facility's (undated) policy and procedure titled, For Completion (Activities of Daily Living) ADL Flow Sheets, showed the following information: -ADL (activities of daily living - dressing, grooming, bathing, eating, and toileting) Flow Sheets will be completed on each resident to ensure continuity and accuracy of care given to each resident; -The nursing assistant assigned to each hall will be responsible for documenting on the ADL Flow Sheet by the end of each shift; -The nursing assistant will be responsible for documenting the bowel movement section on the ADL Flow Sheet; -Any outside contracted services including hospice staff, therapy, etc, qualified to assist residents to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-11 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document a discharge summary with information regarding discharge for one resident (Resident #53). The facility census was 58. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Discharge Summary and Plan, reviewed 1/2017, showed the following: -The discharge plan will include resident and family/caregiver education needs and will initiate or maintain collaboration between the nursing facility and other post-acute care providers to support the resident's transition to community living. The discharge plan, instructions, and summary provides a recapitulation (an act or instance of summarizing and restating the main points of something) or summary of the resident's stay. 1. Record review of Resident # 53's face sheet (admission data) showed the following information: -admission date of 1/18/22; -discharge date [DATE]; -Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (an absence of enough oxygen in the tissues to sustain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to use clean/asepetic technique while performing physician ordered wound care to a diabetic ulcer for one resident (Resident # 41) and failed to apply physician ordered tubigrips (elastic tubular bandages) to one resident's (Resident #17's) legs in a facility with a census of 58. Record review of the facility protocol titled, Treatment Options, revised 4/2018, showed the following: -Chronic wound should be treated using clean (aseptic) treatment technique. 1. Record review of Resident #41's face sheet showed: -admission date of 3/15/22; -Diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, hemiplegia (paralysis to one side of body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the left dominant side, type 2 diabetes mellitus (affects how body process sugar), peripheral vascular disease (a slow and progressive circulation disorder), personal history of diabetic foot ulcer, muscle weakness, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to use clean/aseptic (free from contamination) technique to help prevent possible infection while performing physician ordered wound care to a pressure ulcer for one resident (Resident #43) in a facility with a census of 58. Record review of the facility protocol titled, Treatment Options, revised 4/2018, showed the following: -Chronic wound should be treated using clean (aseptic) treatment technique. 1. Record review of Resident #43's face sheet showed: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Resident on hospice services; -Diagnoses included muscle weakness, schizophrenia (mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally), and adult failure to thrive. Record review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated 3/23/22, showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Totally dependent on staff for assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to consistently provide restorative services, as recommended by therapy, for two residents (Resident #40 and #45). The facility census was 58. Record review of the facility's (undated) policy titled Restorative Nursing Policy and Procedure showed the following: -It is the policy of this facility to provide restorative nursing which promotes the resident's ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible. Restorative nursing focuses on achieving and/or maintaining optimal physical, mental, and psychological function of the resident. The restorative nurse, restorative nurse aide (RNA), along with the interdisciplinary team (IDT), will determine what programs will be initiated for the residents; -Restorative nursing services are provided by RNA, certified nursing assistants (CNA), and other individuals trained in restorative techniques, under the supervision of a licensed nurse; -Screen residents using restorative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-11 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record, the facility failed to ensure all residents received proper treatment and services for their psychosocial well-being when staff did not update one resident's (Resident #1) care plan and implement new interventions and monitoring after the resident made suicidal comments and had suicidal ideations. The facility census was 58. Record review of the facility's policy titled Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring, reviewed 1/2017, showed the following: -As part of the initial assessment, staff will identify individuals with a history of impaired cognition, altered behavior, or mental illness; -As part of the comprehensive assessment, staff will evaluate, based on input from the resident, and representative, review of medical record and general observations the resident's pattern of cognition, mood and behavior; the resident's method of communicating things like pain, hunger, thirst and other physical discomforts; and the resident's responses to stress, fatigue, fear,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a medication regimen free from unnecessary medications when the facility failed to implement gradual dose reductions (GDR-a step wise tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued) for one resident (Resident #4). The facility census was 58. Record review of the facility's policy titled Consultant Pharmacist Services Provider Requirements, dated 6/1/18, showed the following: -Specific activities that the consultant pharmacist performs includes, but is not limited to: reviewing the medication regimen (medication regimen review) of each resident at least monthly, or more frequently under certain conditions (e.g., upon admission or with a significant change in condition) as notified by facility, incorporating federally mandated standards of care in addition to other applicable professional standards as outlined in the procedure for medication regimen review, and documenting the review and findings in the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free form significant medication errors when staff failed to monitor resident bowel movements (BM) resulting in staff not administering laxatives as ordered for two residents (Resident #22) and (Resident #32). The facility had a census of 58. Record review of the facility's (undated) policy and procedure titled, For Completion ADL Flow Sheets, showed the following information: -ADL (activities of daily living - dressing, grooming, bathing, eating, and toileting) Flow Sheets will be completed on each resident to ensure continuity and accuracy of care given to each resident; -The nursing assistant assigned to each hall will be responsible for documenting on the ADL Flow Sheet by the end of each shift; -The nursing assistant will be responsible for documenting the bowel movement section on the ADL Flow Sheet; -Any outside contacted services including hospice staff, therapy, etc, qualified to assist residents to the toilet will need to contact the charge nurse or nursing assistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-11 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide special equipment for one residents (Residents #5) who the facility identified as needing special equipment to assist with eating. The facility census was 58. Record review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to adaptive equipment. 1. Record review of Resident #5's face sheet (a document that gives a patient's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admission date of 7/6/20; -Diagnoses included legal blindness, anxiety, and depression. Record review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 4/14/22, showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Severely impaired vision with no corrective lenses; -Required no assistance from staff for eating. Record review of the resident's care plan, revised 4/14/22, showed the following: -The resident was blind and had prosthetic eyes; -The resident had potential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-11 · tag F0888 — isolated
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure 100% of the staff had been fully vaccinated for COVID-19 (a highly contagious virus that causes serious illness or death) or granted a qualifying exemption, when one contracted staff member (Employee R) did not have the required documentation for a medical exemption. The facility failed to fully implement their Staff Vaccination Policy for COVID-19 by failing to ensure all unvaccinated staff followed facility policy and took necessary precautions to help mitigate the spread of COVID-19 by properly wearing N95 (a respiratory protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of airborne particles) or KN95 (a mask similar to the N95, but it has ear loops and is made to meet Chinese standards for medical masks) mask. The facility census was 58. 1. Record review of the facility's COVID-19 policy titled COVID-19 Universal Vaccination, updated 3/24/22, showed the following: -To establish…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to respond promptly to the toileting and bathing needs for five residents (Residents #7, #15, #45, #46 and #50) out of a selected sample of 24 residents. The facility census was 53. Record review of the facility's policy titled Answering the Call Light, dated October 2010, showed the following: -Answer the resident's call lights as soon as possible; -Listen to the resident's request; -Do what the resident asks of you, if permitted; -If you have promised the resident you will return, do so promptly; -If assistance is needed, turn on the call light to summon help. 1. Record review of Resident #7's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admission dated 7/12/18; -Diagnoses included quadriplegia (paralysis caused by illness or injury to a human that results in the partial or total loss of use of all their limbs and torso) and flaccid neuropathic bladder (lack of bladder control due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain one resident's (Resident #7) dignity by failing to properly cover a urinary catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) bag. A sample of 24 residents was selected for review. The facility census was 53. Record review for the facility's policy titled Catheter Care, dated 10/1/18, did not show reference or guidance to staff regarding covering catheter bags to provide dignity for the resident. 1. Record review of Resident #7's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admission dated 7/12/18; -Diagnoses included quadriplegia (paralysis caused by illness or injury to a human that results in the partial or total loss of use of all their limbs and torso) and flaccid neuropathic bladder (lack of bladder control due to nerve damage). Record review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/26/19, showed the following: -Cognitively intact;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-19 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the facility's bed-hold policy to two sampled residents (Resident #45 and #47) prior to being transferred/discharged to the hospital. The facility census was 53. Record review of the facility's policy titled Bed Hold Policy and Agreement Form, revision dated February 2014, showed the following: -The bed hold agreement is to be obtained for each occurrence of hospital or therapeutic home leave; -When hospital or therapeutic home leave is reported on the midnight census, the business office will notify the resident/responsible party to sign the bed hold agreement; -The business office will address weekend or holiday transfers to the hospital or therapeutic home leave on the next business day. 1. Record review of Resident #45 face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admission dated 12/1/2017; -Diagnosis included kidney disease, muscle weakness, and congestive heart failure (CHF - chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff revised one resident's (Resident #6) comprehensive care plan to include the development of pressure ulcers, out of a sample of 24 residents. The facility census was 53. Record review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated December 2016, showed the residents' care plans will include the following: -Services that are provided to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; -Identified problem areas and treatment goals; -Interventions to aid in preventing or reducing decline in the resident's functional status; -Revision to the care plan when the resident's condition changes. 1. Record review of Resident #6's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admission dated 3/8/18; -Diagnoses included pressure ulcer to the sacral (area at base of spine) region, chronic (long term) pain, and diabetes mellitus (a disease that results in too much sugar in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow physician's order for laboratory tests for two residents (Resident #7 and #11) and for supplement oxygen for one resident (Resident #7) out of a sample of 24 residents. The facility census was 53. Record review of the facility's policy titled Laboratory and Diagnostic Testing, dated September 2012, showed the following: -The physician will identify and order diagnostic and lab testing based on the resident's needs; -The staff will process test requisitions and arrange for tests to be completed. Record review of the facility's undated policy titled Oxygen Therapy, showed the following: -A physician order will be obtained and followed for oxygen use. 1. Record review of Resident #7's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admission dated 7/12/18; -Diagnoses included quadriplegia (paralysis that results in the partial or total loss of use of all limbs and torso) and sleep…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication regimens were free from unnecessary medication when the facility failed to provide rationale to continue an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication (drugs that alter chemical levels in the brain which impact mood and behavior, used to treat mental illness) past 14 days for one resident (Resident #8) in a selected sample of 24. The facility census was 53. Record review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, dated December 2012, showed the following: -If a resident uses PRN medications frequently the physician, interdisciplinary team, and the pharmacist shall reevaluate to determine if there is a clinical reason for the PRN use of the medication ordered. 1. Record review of Resident #8's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admission dated 4/26/17; -Diagnoses included stroke, chronic kidney disease (longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to kidney failure), and depression. Record review of the resident's physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to use appropriate infection control procedures to prevent or reduce the risk of spreading bacteria or other infectious causing contaminants when staff failed to use appropriate hand hygiene while performing incontinent care for one resident (Resident #7) with a catheter and failed to perform appropriate wound care for one resident (Resident #6) in a selected sample of 24 residents. The facility census was 53. According to the Center for Disease Control's (CDC) Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings, 2002, volume 51 showed the following: -The hands are the most common mode of transmitting pathogens (microorganisms); -Clean hands are the single most important factor in preventing the spread of pathogens and antibiotic resistance (infections caused by microorganisms that are resistant to antibiotics) in healthcare settings; -There is substantial evidence that hand hygiene reduces the incidence of infections. Record review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$46,940 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $46,940 — penalty dated 2024-04-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
AURORA HOLDCO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2025
DELTA EDGE STRATEGIC ADVISORSOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2026
HHHH VENTURES LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
KRPSS PARTNERSOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
BLUMENKRANTZ, TUVYAIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2025
FELHEIM, YITCHOKIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
JACOBOVITCH, YOSSIIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
LAPCIUC, AVRAHAMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
LONG, REBECCAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/06/2025
TOWERS, MELANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/06/2025
WILLIAMS, CHERYLIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
NBH3 SFPROPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+17.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$349K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 4%Other / private 23%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $349K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$221per resident / day
operating cost
$6,731per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$268per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265182. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-04-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next