Golden Age Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.02 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 83 beds and averages 36.1 residents a day — about 43% occupied, or roughly 47 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-09-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure on resident, Resident #1 was free from verbal and physical abuse when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA A) grabbed the resident's arm, jerking him/her back into the wheelchair, while yelling and cursing at the resident. The facility census was 43. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, dated 2/19/2014 showed: -Upon hire, all staff will be trained on the abuse and neglect policy and through on going in-services. -Prevention: Our facility will not condone any form of resident abuse and will continually monitor our facility's policies, procedures, training programs, systems, etc., to assist in preventing resident abuse. -An employee of this facility shall not knowingly: b. Fail to report an incident or suspected incident of abuse. -Identify, correct, and intervene in situations in which abuse, neglect and/or misappropriation of resident property is more likely to occur. This includes analysis of: The supervision of staff to identify inappropriate behaviors, such as using derogatory language, rough handling,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-04 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a recapitulation (a detailed summary of the resident's stay at the facility) for three of 12 sampled residents (Resident #42, #43 and #44). The facility census was 39.Review of the facility's undated Discharge Summary policy showed:-The facility will communicate necessary information to the resident, continuing care provider, and other authorized persons at the time of a discharge;-The discharging resident must have written discharge summary that includes a recapitulation of the resident's stay.1. Review of Resident #42's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 1/4/25 showed:- Moderate cognitive impairment;- Substantial assistance with toilet hygiene, dressing, toilet use and transfers;- Required set up with eating;- Diagnoses included high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and arthritis.Review of the resident's care plan dated 7/7/25, showed:-Assistance of two for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure staff served food to residents in a sanitary manner when Dietary Aide A served three residents their meals after touching unclean surfaces in the dining room with gloved hands without changing gloves or washing hands between each resident. This affected three of 12 sampled residents (Resident #22, #23 and #27). The facility census was 39.The facility did not provide the requested policy on sanitary handling of food served to the residents. 1.Review of Resident #22's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 06/18/25 showed:- Severe cognitive impairment;- Partial assistance for activities of daily living (ADL)s;- Partial assistance for eating;- Diagnoses included cancer, high blood pressure and heart failure.Review of the resident's care plan dated, 6/27/25 showed:-Assistance of one to two for ADLs;-Resident had a diagnosis of dementia.2. Review of Resident #23's admission MDS dated , 07/17/25 showed:- Severe cognitive impairment;- Dependent on staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections when the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were used for residents with wounds and/or an indwelling medical devices. This affected two residents (Resident #1, Resident #4) of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 39.Review of facilities Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, dated 10/2/2020, showed:-Enhanced Barrier Precautions apply to all residents with any of the following: wounds and/or indwelling medical devices (e.g., central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy, or ventilator) regardless of MDRO (multidrug-resistance organisms) colonization status. Review of resident #4's Care Plan, undated showed:The resident had a foley catheter due to urinary retention with bladder obstruction;The resident was at risk for falls;The resident had a diagnosis of heart failure.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-03 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employee a full time Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) for the facility who was responsible for operation of the facility. In addition the LNHA was not available on a full time basis in the facility to provide oversight including development of a Facility Assessment or oversee the Quality Assurance program to ensure the residents receive appropriate nursing and medical care. The census was 43. Review of the facility's Assistant Administrator Job Description, dated 3/22/24, showed: -Golden Age Nursing Home requires Administration to maintain a courteous professional manner while interacting and communicating with residents, their families, co-workers, and visitors. This extends to telephone conversations, and written or digital forms of communication. -On request or on absence of the Administrator, the Assistant Administrator will function as the primary spokesperson for Golden Age Nursing Home and be the main representative for the facility to the public, community, and Golden Age Nursing Age District Board. -When…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-03 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies as required. This had the potential to affect all of the residents. The sample was 19. The census was 43. Review of the facility's Matrix for Providers, dated 8/28/24, showed a census of 43 and the following resident characteristics: -26 residents with Dementia diagnosis -One resident fed via tube -No residents on dialysis -Three residents with indwelling catheter -11 residents with falls -6 residents on Hospice services During an interview on 8/28/24 at 1:22 P.M. the Administrator said: - She does not work in the facility on a full time basis. -She did not know anything about a facility assessment and does not have one. -She found information online and would write one but did not have a current assessment.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-03 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a signature from the resident or or resident's legal representative on the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) forms prior to discharging from Medicare services for two residents (Resident #4 and #11) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 43. Review of form instructions skilled nursing facility advance beneficiary notice of non-coverage (SNFABN) Form CMS-10055, dated 4/8/2014, showed: -Signature and date: The beneficiary or their authorized representative must sign the signature box to acknowledge that they read and understood the notice. The skilled nursing facility may fill in the date if the beneficiary needs help. The date should reflect the date the SNF gave therm notice to the beneficiary in-person or when appropriate, the date contact was made with the beneficiary's authorized representative by phone. If an authorized representative signs for he beneficiary, write 'rep' or representative next to the signature. If the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the walls, hallways, ceilings and floors in a clean and homelike environment. Furthermore the facility failed to ensure furnishings were in good repair. The facility census was 43. The facility did not provide a policy for cleaning, maintenance of the facility and care of furnishings. Observations beginning on 08/28/24 at 11:06 A.M. showed on the 300 hall: -There was a gash in the sheet-rock between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]; -There were multiple nicks and scratches in the sheet of the lower third of the hallway walls -Ceiling vent was rusted; -Multiple ceiling tiles had water stains; - Water stains on carpets in outpatient therapy room and room between the outpatient therapy and the exit door; -Multiple light fixtures had dead bugs and debris ; -There was water staining around vent outside room [ROOM NUMBER]; -Cobwebs were in the corners of the exit door, hallway and ceiling; -Dust, dirt and debris behind the fire doors in the floor corners. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-03 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — pattern
  Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to check the Family Care Safe Registry (FCSR) prior to employment to ensure all newly hired employees as well as checking the NA Registry to verify that new employees did not have a Federal Indicator (marker given to individuals who have committed abuse/neglect. This affected eight out of eight sampled employees hired since August, 2024. The facility census was 43. Review of the facility's Personnel Policy, dated January 2020., showed no information in regard to the requirement for staff to complete criminal background checks prior to employment. Review of the facility's undated Abuse and Neglect Policy., showed: -No information regarding Family Care Safe Registry verification. -No information regarding all staff to be verified through the NA Registry. Review of new employee hire records in the years 2023 and 2024., showed: -Staff #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, and #8 had no FCSR verification completed by the facility. -Staff #6 #7 had no verification through the NA registry completed by the facility During an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-03 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure five randomly sampled nursing staff (Nurse Aide A, Certified Nurse Aid A, B and C and Certified Medication Technician A)had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident and that nurse aides are able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs. The deficient practice potentially effected all residents. The facility census was 43. The facility did not provide a policy on competencies. Review of the employee files showed: -Nurse Aide (NA) A: -date of hire was 9/13/23 -No competency evaluation at the time of hire or within the last 12 months or since hire. -Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A: -date of hire was 5/17/22 -No competency evaluation at the time of hire nor within the last 12 months -CNA B : -date of hire 9/14/17 -No competency evaluation at the time of hire nor within the last 12…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-03 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
  Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one nurse aide (NA) completed a nurse aide training program within four months of his/her employment in the facility. The census was 43. The facility did not provide a policy on use of Nurse Aides. Review of Nurse Aide (NA) A employee file showed: -Date of hire 9/13/23 -He/She completed an orientation module between 9/18/23 and 10/5/23. During an interview on 08/28/24 04:11 PM NA A said: -He/She began employment while he/she was in high school. -He/She did not attend a Vocational Technical School for Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) training. -He/She was not enrolled in CNA classes. -Administration had not discussed CNA classes with him/her. -He/She was not aware he/she needed to be certified within 4 months of hire. The administrator was not available for interview. During an interview the Director of Nursing said: -Nurse Aide A is not certified; -She is unsure why Nurse Aide A has not been in class.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-10 for 15 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO