Avenir At Mark Twain
11988 Mark Twain Lane, Bridgeton, MO 63044 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (314) 291-8240 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $183,665 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-21)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (71%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 22.8% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.3% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.4% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 23.9% | 17.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.4% | 25.6% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.2% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.8% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.5% | 17.8% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.3% | 23.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.6% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 56.7% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.04 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.81 | 2.33 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 6.4–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 3.6–14.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.27 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 77.1 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
63 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate assistance to prevent accidents when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) F provided improper transfers to two residents (Residents #3 and #4) resulting in injury. Resident #3 was identified by the facility as requiring a Hoyer lift for transfers. On 05/16/26, CNA F transferred the resident by picking up the resident without a lift, a gait belt, or another employee to assist. The resident's foot got caught, resulting in a fractured right tibia (shin bone) and fibula (calf bone). CNA F was suspended, re-educated on the facility's transfer policies, and returned to work. Resident #4 was identified by the facility as requiring two staff to assist with transfers. On 05/27/26, CNA F performed a transfer by him/herself to assist the resident to the bathroom. CNA F did not use a gait belt. The resident fell, resulting in a fractured fibula. The sample was 5. The census was 83.The Administrator was notified on 06/18/26 at 1:15 P.M. of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate basic life support, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, a lifesaving technique that's used in emergencies in which someone's breathing or heartbeat has stopped) for one (Resident #1) of three sampled residents, who was found by staff without a pulse. Staff started CPR on a resident with full code orders but stopped before Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrived. The Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) on duty said they did not know how to determine code status. EMS was not notified timely, the resident was discovered without pulse at 5:10 A.M. and EMS was not contacted until 6:14 A.M. The resident expired. Additionally, the facility failed to provide CPR qualified staff for 14, full eight hour shifts between [DATE] through [DATE]. The Staffing Coordinator (SC) did not know he/she was responsible to ensure one CPR certified staff person was available on each shift. Fifty-four residents were listed as full code residents. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free from hazards and residents received supervision per the facility's smoking protocol and individual resident smoking assessments when five residents were left unattended in the outside courtyard without staff available to let them back in for approximately 30 minutes during freezing weather conditions, with a temperature of 22 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and wind speeds of nine miles per hour (mph) (Residents #69, #58, #65, #63 and #68). One resident (Resident #69) required supervision at all times for safety. The door to the outside courtyard could only be opened from the inside and once closed, residents and staff could not get back inside unless let in by someone inside the building, or by using a slanted walkway through the courtyard to get to a back gate that exited to a driving path where vehicles traveled. In addition, one resident (Resident #65) was observed to enter the code on the keypad…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative after the resident fell, for one out of three residents sampled for falls. (Resident #1). The census was 75.Review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility staff, dated 11/10/25, showed:-Cognitive intact;-Diagnoses included: diabetes, high blood pressure, end stage renal failure (ESRD, chronic irreversible kidney failure) dependence on renal dialysis (a life-sustaining treatment that filters waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are no functioning properly);-Mobility devices: wheelchair and walker;-One fall since admission/entry or reentry;-Partial/moderate assistance (helper does less than half of the effort. Helper lifts, holds or supports trunk or limbs, but provides less than half the effort) for chair/bed-to-chair transfers. Review of the resident's care plan in the use at the time of survey, showed:-Focus: The resident has had an actual fall with no Injury, minor injury,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services meet professional standards of quality by failing to follow physician orders to call the physician when blood sugar levels were out or range and/or obtaining blood sugar checks as ordered. In addition, staff failed to obtain a physician order for when staff should notify the physician of blood glucose (sugar) levels that are out of range for three residents (Residents #6, #1, and #4). The sample was 6. The census was 75.Review of the facility's Nursing Care of the Older Adult with Diabetes's Mellitus (DM, metabolic disease) policy, undated, showed:-Glycemic targets (a personalized blood glucose goal set by a healthcare provider to manage diabetes): use a glucometer (blood sugar meter) for capillary blood sampling to measure current blood glucose levels;-The target range for healthy older adults is considered 90-130 milligrams (mg)per deciliter (dl), (fasting or pre-prandial glucose (blood glucose level just before eating);-Establish…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly and accurately assess and document a resident's surgical wound upon admission, then weekly per the facility's policy for one resident (Resident #1). The sample was 6. The census was 75.Review of the facility's Skin Integrity-Pressure and Non-Pressure policy, undated, showed:-Purpose: to establish guidelines for assessing, monitoring and documentation the presence of the skin breakdown, pressure injuries and other non-pressure skin conditions and assuring interventions are implemented;-Guidelines: non-pressure skin conditions (surgical wounds) will be assessed for healing process and signs of complications or infection;-A skin condition assessment will be completed at the time of admission/readmission;-Resident identified will have a weekly skin assessment by a licensed nurse. A wound assessment will be initiated and documented in the resident chart when pressure and/or other non-pressure skin conditions are identified by licensed nurse.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice when staff failed to administer treatments as ordered for non-pressure wounds, to complete comprehensive skin assessments on a routine basis, and to reassess for efficacy of treatments for skin integrity issues for one resident (Resident #54). The sample was 6. The census was 72.Review of the facility's Skin Assessment policy, revised 1/18/24, showed:-Policy: It is our policy to perform a full body skin assessment as part of our systematic approach to pressure injury prevention and management. This policy includes the following procedural guidelines in performing the full body skin assessment;-Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines included:--A full body, or head to toe, skin assessment will be conducted by a licensed or registered nurse upon admission/re-admission and weekly thereafter. The assessment may also be performed after a change of condition or after any newly identified pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified manner affecting 5 of 18 sampled residents (Residents #1, #58, #64, #28 and #5). The census was 75. Review of the facility's resident's rights policy, undated, showed:-Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity;-Residents are entitled to exercise their rights and privileges to the fullest extent possible. Our facility will make every effort to assist each resident in exercising his or her rights to assure that the resident is always treated with respect, kindness, and dignity;-Respect: Treat others as you want to be treated-every person matters. 1. Review of Resident #1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated, 5/31/25, showed:-Cognitively intact;-Diagnoses included Ogilvie syndrome (acute dilation of the colon), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of lung diseases that block…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment to all residents in the facility by failing to keep resident rooms at a comfortable temperature and cleanliness (Residents #26, #1, #64), ensuring bed sheets are changed when soiled (Resident #47) and failing to keep resident shower rooms free of obstruction. Concerns were noted with the cleanliness of resident rooms for four out of 18 sampled residents in addition to resident shower rooms on the [NAME] hall. The census was 75.1. Review of Resident #26's medical record, showed diagnoses included bipolar disorder (mood disorder that can cause intense mood swings), depression, seizure disorder, generalized muscle weakness, difficulty walking, unsteadiness on feet, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility.Observation on 8/15/25 at 12:27 P.M., showed the resident seated on the side of his/her bed with a small fan on his/her bedside table. The air conditioning (AC) unit beneath the window set to cool, on and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0620 — patternNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place to safeguard resident's personal belongings for two residents (Resident # 68 and Resident #9). The facility also failed to have an admissions policy that did not require residents to waive the facility of liability for loss of personal property. The sample was 18. The census was 75. Review of the facility's current admission packet showed:Personal Property of Resident: The resident is strongly urged to mark all his or her clothing and personal property for easy identification. The resident or authorized representative will be responsible to complete a personal items inventory sheet and update the inventory sheet as needed. The facility shall not be liable for any resident's items that are lost or stolen, with the exception of those items noted for replacement under state guidelines that the facility might reside. 1. Review of Resident #68's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated, 5/9/25, showed:-An admission date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received an accurate assessment reflective of the residents' status at the time of assessment by coding side rails as restraints on the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) for four residents who were determined to use side rails without restriction of freedom of movement (Residents #49, #10, #11, and #35). The sample was 18. The census was 75.Review of the facility's Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) policy, created 4/14/25, showed facility will adhere to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) regulations which are considered the definitive source in completion of the RAI process. This includes coding the MDS with accuracy, completion of Care Area Assessments (CAAs) and the development of the comprehensive care plan. Facility will use the CMS RAI manual for completion of the RAI process.Review of the CMS Long-Term Care (LTC) Facility RAI 3.0 User's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice when one resident (Resident #27) did not receive his/her routine anti-anxiety medication as prescribed for over two weeks. The facility also failed to document accurate weights on one resident (Resident #10) and failed to document when two residents (Resident #9 and Resident #68) left the facility for outside appointments and when the residents returned to the facility. The sample was 18. The census was 75. Review of the facility's Medical Provider Orders policy, revised 4/7/23, showed:-Policy: The facility shall use uniform guidelines for the ordering and following of medical provider orders;-Following of Medication and/or Treatment Orders;-Staff should follow all valid medical provider orders timely unless there is an emergency which would temporarily delay the implementation of the order;-The policy did not provide guidance for processes on reordering medications or pulling medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory services consistent with professional standards of practice when staff failed to ensure oxygen tubing and nebulizer (a medical device that administers breathing medication in an aerosol form) face masks were changed when contaminated and properly stored for two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #17). The staff failed follow the physician orders and ensure the resident was received the ordered amount of oxygen for three residents (Resident #17, Resident #10 and Resident #55). The sample was 18. The census was 75. Review of the facility's Oxygen and Therapy Policy and Procedure, undated, showed:-Purpose: To ensure residents who require oxygen therapy receive safe, person-centered, and clinically appropriate respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice;-Policy Statement: Oxygen requires a licensed prescriber order except for emergency use under the facility's standing emergency protocol, with immediate provider notification; -Preparation and Verification: Verify…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 50 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess residents for safety for side rail use, to obtain informed consent for the use of side rails, and to have a policy that provided guidance for staff assessing residents for use of side rails that were not used as a restraint (Residents #35, #11, #48, #10, #49, and #2). The facility identified 14 residents with side rails. The sample was 18. The census was 75.Review of the facility's Use of Restraints policy, reviewed February 2021, showed: - Physical Restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or restricts normal access to one's body;-The definition of a restraint is based on the functional status of the resident and not the device. If the resident cannot remove a device in the same manner in which the staff applied it given that resident's physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were served food at a palatable, safe, and appetizing temperature during meal service. This affected 10 of 18 sampled residents (Residents #5, #7, #17, #26, #27, #48, #54, #60, #64 and #68). The census was 75. Review of the facility's meal temperature policy, revised 1/2019, showed:-Purpose: To ensure appropriate food temperatures during meal service and to ensure appropriate food holding temperatures. To comply with federal and state regulations governing food meal service;-Policy: Meals temperatures shall be monitored by the Dietary Manager and the Cooks on a daily basis. Hot food shall be cooked or heated to a temperature above 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F) . Cold food shall be chilled to a temperature below 40 degrees F. Foods shall be provided at point of service to support resident/patient satisfaction. Temperatures of hot food shall be supported to promote service temperatures of hot foods to about 120 degrees F and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that accommodates resident allergies and preferences, and to provide alternative meal options (Residents #26, #5, #49, #48, #60, #27, #35, and #55). The sample was 18. The census was 75.1. Review of the facility's resident council meeting minutes, showed:-On 6/25/25, 13 residents in attendance. Staff are not properly reading the tickets and sending meals to their rooms that their tickets state they do not want. Alternative menus - some meals they do not have in the kitchen, so they do not reach out to ask if they want another alternative meal; -On 7/16/25, 20 residents in attendance. Residents complained the kitchen staff is rude and fail to read the tickets accurately. They also noted that some meals are not available. One resident expressed frustration of being served daily eggs when he/she is allergic to eggs. During a group interview on 8/18/25 at 11:03 A.M., six out of six residents, whom the facility identified as alert…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen cooking appliances were in working order, failed to ensure the kitchen and appliances were clean and failed to ensure the dishwasher was in working order. The sample was 18. The census was 75. Review of the facility's kitchen daily cleaning schedule, undated, showed:-The cook is responsible for cleaning the oven, deep fryer, steam table, preparation station table, and microwave;-Dietary Aides are responsible for cleaning stainless steel, walk-in freezer, dish machine area, reach in refrigerator, and walk-in refrigerator. Review of the kitchen maintenance logs, showed no maintenance requests were made from 1/1/25 to 8/20/25 for the broken oven, range oven or walk-in freezer door. 1.Observation on 8/14/25, of the kitchen, showed:-At 10:17 A.M., the walk-in freezer door did not close all the way. Ice was built up on the floor near the door. There was no temperature log for the walk in freezer;-At 10:19 A.M., the dry storage room had food and trash debris on the floor under the racks. Two ceiling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation and provide evidence of an ongoing Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that demonstrated systemic identification, reporting, investigation, analysis, and prevention of adverse events, and development, implementation, and evaluation of corrective actions or performance improvement activities. The census was 75.During an interview on 8/14/25 at 10:21 A.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) and Administrator said they began working at the facility approximately two months ago. Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings should take place monthly and should be attended by the facility's department heads and Medical Director. The DON and Administrator were asked to provide documentation of the facility's QAPI plan. During an interview on 8/20/25 at 12:13 P.M., the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator said she has been a department head at the facility for two years. When the facility has QAA meetings, they are attended by department heads. When she attends the meetings, she brings a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections. The facility failed to ensure employee two-step tuberculin skin tests were completed in accordance with State guidelines for three out of 10 employees reviewed. The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for residents with gastrostomy tubes (g-tube, a tube surgically inserted into the abdomen that is used for medications and liquid nutrition) and chronic wounds requiring treatments (Residents #10, #4 and #3). In addition, staff failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide documentation of ongoing educational training provided to active Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs), totaling no less than 12 hours per year, for four of six sampled active CNAs. Insufficient training documentation was provided for four of six sampled CNAs. The sample was 18. The census was 75.1. Review of CNA E's CNA Annual In-Service Training Log, showed:-Inservices completed each month from January 2025 to June 2025, with each inservice totaling one hour;-No record of inservices completed prior to January 2025. 2. Review of CNA Z's CNA Annual In-Service Training Log, showed:-Inservices completed each month from January 2025 to June 2025, with each inservice totaling one hour;-No record of inservices completed prior to January 2025. 3. Review of CNA AA's CNA Annual In-Service Training Log, showed:-No record of inservices completed for the past year, from hire date to hire date, while employed at the facility. 4. Review of CNA BB's CNA Annual In-Service Training Log, showed:-No record of inservices completed for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' self-determined preferences and requests were implemented. The facility failed to assist two dependent residents to get out of bed after breakfast, in accordance with their preferences (Resident # 48 and Resident #49). In addition, staff failed to provide one resident a shower when requested (Resident #68). The sample was 18. The census was 75. Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, undated, showed:-Residents are entitled to exercise their rights and privileges to the fullest extent possible: The facility will make every effort to assist each resident in exercising his/her rights to assure the resident is treated with dignity, kindness, and respect; -Self-determination: Personal freedom means allowing residents to make decisions about themselves. Some examples the facility protects are residents' self-determination including when to choose bath time and type of bath, choose waking and sleeping times, and choose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure third party liability (TPL) forms were completed within 30 days for the final accounting for residents who expired. This affected three out of five sampled residents who expired and had money in their accounts (Residents #77, #78, and #79). The census was 75.Review of the facility's Resident Trust Fund policy, revised [DATE], showed:-Purpose: To establish policy and procedures for the Facility Resident Trust Fund;-Policy: It will be the policy of the management company that the Resident Trust Fund is managed and accounted for in accordance with State and Federal regulations. Each facility should follow the State guidelines of the payment programs using the greatest level of specificity if requirements vary in State and Federal programs;-Procedures:-If a resident receives any TPL payments, notification must be sent to the Medicaid caseworker within five business days or per State guidelines;-Facility shall refund the balance of the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete criminal background checks on newly hired employees prior to the employee's start date, and/or failed to ensure newly hired employees were screened to rule out the presence of a Federal Indicator through the Nurse Aide (NA) Registry, for five of 10 employees hired since the last survey. In addition, the facility's policy for screening new hires failed to include completion of checking the NA Registry. The census was 75.Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy, revised June 2024, showed:-Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property;-Screening:-A. Potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property;-1. Background, reference, and credentials' checks shall be conducted on potential employees,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) needs were met for three of 18 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure general hygiene needs were met for two residents (Residents #1 and #64) and feeding assistance was provided to one resident (Resident #28). The sample was 18. The census was 75. Review of the facility's ADL policy, undated, showed:-Purpose: To ensure residents receive assistance with ADLs to maintain or enhance their dignity, independence, and quality of life, while preventing avoidable decline in function;-Procedure: Care plans will reflect each resident's functional status, strengths, limitations, and preferences. Staff will provide individualized assistance with bathing, grooming, dressing, eating, mobility, toileting, and hygiene as needed. Residents will be encouraged to participate in their ADLs to the fullest extent possible. Care will be delivered in a private and respectful manner. All ADL care provided, resident participation, refusals, and changes in condition will be documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident received proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health (Resident #3). The sample was 18. The census was 75.Review of the facility's Nail and Foot Care policy, undated, showed:-Purpose: To ensure residents receive safe, hygienic, and person-centered nail and foot care that promotes dignity, prevents infection, and maintains independence in accordance with facility standards;-Procedures: On admission and quarterly, nursing staff will assess nail and foot status; Residents' care plan will reflect frequency and level of nail and foot care required;-Restrictions: Staff may not perform toenail trimming for residents with diabetes, peripheral vascular disease (a narrowing of the arteries in the legs that reduces blood flow), neuropathy (numbness and tingling in the feet), or on anticoagulation therapy (blood thinners); These residents require podiatry (foot doctor) or licensed nursing intervention; Any abnormal findings (redness, swelling, pain, drainage, or fungal infection)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for two residents who were identified as high fall risks (Resident #3 and Resident #17). The facility also failed to ensure one resident with a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) was in an upright position during meals to prevent choking or aspiration (food or liquids that is inhaled into the lungs) (Resident #10). The sample was 18. The census was 75. Review of the facility's Fall Prevention Policy (S.A.F.E.), revised February, 2001, showed;Policy: The S.A.F.E. program promotes Safety, Assessment, Fall prevention and Education of both staff and residents; At the time of admission and re-admission the Fall Risk Data Collection and Fall Risk Questionnaire will be completed; Residents found to be at high risk for falls are place on the S.A.F.E. program, and specific interventions is implementing, related to the resident's high risk for falls. 1. Review of Resident #3's quarterly Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of one resident (Resident #9). The sample was 18. The census was 75. Review of the facility's Test Results policy, undated, showed:- Results of laboratory, radiological, and diagnostic tests shall be reported to the facility.-The medical practitioner shall be notified of the results.-The Director of Nursing (DON), or nurse receiving the test results, shall be responsible for notifying the medical practitioner of such test results. Review of the facility's Medical Provider Orders, revised 4/7/23, showed:-Policy: -This facility shall use uniform guidelines for the ordering and following of medical provider orders;-Documentation of medication and treatment orders: -Each medication and or treatment order should be documented with the date, time, and signature of the person receiving the order; -If using electronic medical records, input the medication and/or treatment according to the electronic health record instructions and facility policy;-Following of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident received double portions and nectar-thick liquids for aspiration precautions in accordance with physician orders (Resident #47). The sample was 18. The census was 75.Review of Resident #47's medical record, showed:-Diagnoses included pneumonitis (inflammation of the lungs) due to inhalation of food and vomit, dysphagia (swallowing disorder), history of stroke, epilepsy (seizure disorder), and hypertension (high blood pressure);-A physician order, revised 12/13/24, to admit to hospice with admitting diagnoses of aspiration pneumonia;-A physician order, dated 2/26/25, for regular diet, regular texture, nectar-thick liquids. Double portions. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/12/25, showed:-Cognitively intact;-Supervision or touching assistance required for eating. Review of the resident's care plan, in use at the time of survey, showed:-Focus: Resident has an activities of daily living…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee meetings were held at least quarterly to fulfill the committee's responsibilities to identify and correct quality deficiencies effectively. The census was 75.During an interview on 8/14/25 at 10:21 A.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) and Administrator said they began working at the facility approximately two months ago. QAA meetings should take place monthly. QAA meetings should be attended by the facility's department heads and Medical Director. Review of the facility's QAA sign in sheets for the last 12 months, from August 2024 to August 2025, showed:-Meeting held 9/6/24;-Meeting held in April 2025;-No documentation of other QAA meetings held within the 12-month timeframe.During an interview on 8/18/25 at 10:12 A.M., the Administrator said the QAA sign-in sheets provided were the only sheets he could locate. Before he started working with the facility, the Social Services Director (SSD) was the interim Administrator. She held one meeting in April 2025. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop policies and procedures ensuring all residents in the facility had been offered the influenza vaccine. The facility failed to ensure documentation of received vaccines were noted in the medical records of three of five sampled residents (Residents #5, #11 and #4). The resident sample was 18. The facility census was 75.Review of the facility's Resident Immunizations and and Vaccinations policy, revised in 2019 showed:-It is facility policy that all residents are offered influenza vaccination annually;-All new admissions will be screened and given the influenza vaccine, unless specifically ordered by the Primary Physician;-A record of vaccination will be placed in the resident's medical record. 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record showed:-An admission date of 1/10/25;-Medical diagnoses including hypertension, End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD, permanent kidney failure requiring transplant or dialysis for survival), history of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA, a temporary interruption in blood flow to the brain causing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop policies and procedures ensuring all residents in the facility had been offered COVID-19 vaccine education and/or had documentation of vaccination against COVID-19 in their facility medical record The facility failed to ensure documentation of received vaccines was noted in the medical records of three of five sampled residents. The resident sample was 18. The facility census was 75.Review of the facility's Resident Immunizations and and Vaccinations policy, revised in 2019 showed:-It is facility policy that all residents are offered influenza vaccination annually;-It is facility policy that all residents are offered pneumococcal vaccination;-No mention of vaccination against or education regarding COVID-19. 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record showed:-An admission date of 1/10/2025;-Medical diagnoses including hypertension, End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD, permanent kidney failure requiring transplant or dialysis for survival), history of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA, a temporary interruption in blood flow to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was free from flies during two of five days of survey. The sample was 18. The census was 75. 1.Review of the facility's pest control logs, showed:-On 6/20/25 the kitchen was treated for pests;-On 7/18/25 the kitchen was treated for pests;-On 8/15/25 the kitchen was treated for pests. 2. Observation on 8/15/25, of the kitchen, showed:-At 11:41 A.M. multiple flies flew around the food preparation station, landing on food and utensils;-At 11:50 A.M., the Dietary Manager stopped food preparations to kill a fly with a bottle of cleaning wipes;-At 12:07 P.M., multiple flies flew around the dish washing station landing on clean and dirty dishes. 3. Observation on 8/18/25, of the kitchen, showed:-At 10:04 A.M., multiple flies were in the dishwashing station landing on clean cups;-At 10:12 A.M., flies flew around the food preparation area landing on utensils. 4. During an interview on 8/15/25 at 9:39 A.M., the Maintenance Director said he was not aware of the amount of flies in the kitchen. He said a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving neglect were reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made, to the State Survey Agency for one resident (Resident #1) after the facility was made aware staff started cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and stopped before Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrived. The sample was 3. The census was 71. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy, revised 6/24, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property; -Definitions: Neglect means failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Residents #3, #1, and #5) received care in accordance with acceptable standards of practice when staff failed to complete progress notes when a resident had a fall (Residents #3 and #5), was sent to the hospital, and returned from the hospital (Resident #3). The facility failed to complete post fall follow up for 72 hours that included, progress notes per shift (Residents #3, #1 and #5), vital signs per shift (Resident #3), and neurological checks (neuro check - pulse rate, respiration rate, and blood pressure measurements; assessment of pupil size and reactivity; and equality of hand grip strength) (Resident #1) in accordance with facility policies. Additionally, the facility failed to update the care plan with interventions for each fall (Resident #1), and to follow interventions previously listed in the care plan (Resident #3). The facility also failed to document notifications to the physician (Residents #3 and #5) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were met, when the facility failed to ensure one out of three resident's labs were obtained per physician orders (Resident #108). The census was 80. Review of the facility's Laboratory Services and Reporting Policy, dated reviewed/revised on 8/18/2023, showed: -Policy: The facility must provide or obtain laboratory services when ordered by a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist in accordance with state law; -The facility must provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents. Review of Resident #108's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility staff, dated 7/15/24, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses included: heart failure, high blood pressure, urinary tract infection (UTI) past 30 days, diabetes, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, lung disease) and adult failure to thrive (term used to describe a decline in an elderly person's health that's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of staff to resident verbal abuse, which was overheard by Resident #1, involving Resident #2 and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A to the Department of Health of Senior Services (DHSS) within the required two-hour time frame. The sample was 2. The census was 82. Review of the facility's undated Abuse Prohibition Policy, showed: -Facility operation policy: each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, neglect, misappropriation of resident property or exploitation. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, agency staff, family or legal guardians; -Definitions: -Abuse: means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish; -Verbal abuse: defined as the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to resident or their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to investigate an allegation of verbal abuse between Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A and Resident #2 which was overheard by Resident #1 from the shared bathroom of Resident #1 and #2. Resident #1 reported the incident to the facility's Social Worker (SW) on 4/4/24. The allegation was not investigated following the resident notification. The sample size was 2. The census was 82. Review of the facility's undated Abuse Prohibition Policy, showed: -Facility operation policy: each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, neglect, misappropriation of resident property or exploitation. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, agency staff, family or legal guardians; -Definitions: -Abuse: means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish; -Verbal abuse: defined as the use of oral,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-19 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure general accounting principles were followed by failing to follow up on outstanding checks during monthly resident trust fund reconciliations. The facility identified 20 residents with funds handled by the facility. The census was 69. Review of the facility's Resident Trust Fund (RTF) policy, undated, showed: -Purpose: To establish policy and procedures for the facility RTF; -Policy: It will be the policy of the management company that the RTF is managed and accounted for in accordance with state and federal regulations. Each facility should follow the state guidelines of the payment programs using the greatest level of specificity if requirements vary in state and federal programs; -Procedure included: -The resident fund bank account must be reconciled monthly immediately upon receipt of the bank statement. The corporate office must receive these by the sixth business day of the following month; -The above balancing should be done as close to month end as possible, any discrepancies or variances should be resolved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to check for a federal indicator (identifies when an employee who has ever held a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) certificate and has ever been found to have abused, neglected, or misappropriated resident property) through the state Nurse Aide (NA) registry, for six of 10 employee files reviewed, and failed to ensure checking for a federal indicator was part of the facility's abuse policies for employee screening. The census was 69. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy, revised 11/23/23, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property; -Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines included: -Screening: -A. Potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property; -Background, reference, and credentials'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-19 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) received the required 12 hours of annual in-service training, for five of five CNAs sampled. The facility identified 13 CNAs employed more than a year. The census was 69. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment Tool, last updated 11/23/23, showed staff training/education is conduced by in-services, 1 on 1 training, and education packets with post-tests. Clinical staff is monitored for 1 on 1 competencies. Mandatory 12 hours for nurse aide training, etc. Review of the facility's in-service binder, showed: -CNA W, date of hire 7/1/98; -CNA V, date of hire 2/6/14; -CNA Y, date of hire 3/2/20; -CNA X, date of hire 11/1/22; -CNA O, date of hire 12/27/22; -In-service training separated by month, including in-services provided to staff in all departments, with no tracking per CNA by hire date; -A stack of skill checklists for CNAs related to providing care with no hours identified and no tracking by hire date. During an interview on 1/18/24 at 11:10 A.M., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents food at a safe and appetizing temperature for five residents (Residents #13, #58, #61, #63 and #64). The sample was 17. The census was 69. Review of the facility's record of food temperatures policy, revised 12/12/23, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to record food temperatures daily to ensure food is at the proper serving temperatures before trays are assembled; -Guidelines: If the food temperature falls into an unsafe range, immediately follow procedures for reheating previously cooked food. No food will be served that does not meet the food code standard temperatures. 1. Review of Resident #13's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/25/22, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Requires assistance with eating; -Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus and sleep apnea(breathing starts and stops in sleep). During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure six out of 10 sampled staff hired since the last survey or full inspection, received their two-step tuberculin skin test prior to or upon hire as per facility policy. The census was 69. Review of the facility's Tuberculosis, Employee Screening policy, undated, showed: -Policy Statement: All employees shall be screened for tuberculosis (TB) infection and disease, using a two-step tuberculin skin test {TST) or blood assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (BAMT) and symptom screening, prior to beginning employment. The need for annual testing shall be determined by the annual TB risk classification or as per State regulations; -New Employee Screening: -1. Each newly hired employee will be screened for TB infection and disease after an employment offer has been made but prior to the employee's duty assignment; -2. The Employee Health Coordinator (or designee) will accept documented verification of two-step TST or BAMT results within the preceding 12 months; -a. If the TST or BAMT result was negative, the employee will not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or responsible parties were notified in a timely manner when a resident's account was within the $200.00 Social Security (SSI) limit ($5,726.00) or when the resident's account was over the SSI limit. This affected two residents reviewed who received Medicaid benefits (Residents #176 and #45). The census was 69. Review of the facility's Resident Trust Fund (RTF) policy, undated, showed: -Purpose: To establish policy and procedures for the facility RTF; -Policy: It will be the policy of the management company that the RTF is managed and accounted for in accordance with state and federal regulations. Each facility should follow the state guidelines of the payment programs using the greatest level of specificity if requirements vary in state and federal programs; -General included: -Any individual resident trust account that is nearing the state specified maximum balance will require the following action: --a. Notification to resident/responsible party as to balance (Medicaid Limit letter). Discussion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed for one resident, including a recapitulation of the resident's stay and a final summary of the resident's status at the time of the discharge, for one of one resident investigated for discharge (Resident #72). The census was 69. Review of Resident #72's medical record, showed: -admitted [DATE]; -Primary diagnosis traumatic subdural hemorrhage (brain bleed); -An order dated 11/13/23 to discharge to another long-term care facility; -A progress note dated 11/17/23, resident discharged to another long-term care facility at 12:00 P.M. with medications, via family personal car; -A discharge summary opened in the electronic medical record on 11/17/23 at 12:43 P.M., was blank. During an interview on 1/19/24 at 8:24 A.M., the Interim Administrator/Social Services said she is responsible for completing the discharge summary. Social services start it once they know where the resident is going, set up the discharge, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health by failing to ensure timely follow-up with a podiatrist for one resident (Resident #7). The census was 69. Review of the facility's Care of Fingernails/Toenails policy, revised February 2018, showed: -Purpose: The purposes of this procedure are to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections; -General Guidelines: -1. Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming; -2. Proper nail care can aid in the prevention of skin problems around the nail bed; -3. Unless otherwise permitted, do not trim the nails of diabetic residents or residents with circulatory impairments; -4. Trimmed and smooth nails prevent the resident from accidentally scratching and injuring his or her skin; -5. Watch for and report any changes in the color of the skin around the nail bed, blueness of the nails, any signs of poor circulation, cracking of the skin between the toes, any swelling, bleeding, etc.; -6. Stop and report to the nurse supervisor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited mobility received services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility as recommended by the Physical Therapist for one of three residents investigated for position and mobility (Resident #39). The census was 69. Review of the facility's Restorative Nursing Programs policy, date implemented 9/13/23 and last date reviewed 1/18/24, showed: -It is the policy of this facility to provide maintenance and restorative services designated to maintain or improve a resident's ability to the highest practicable level; -Restorative nursing program refers to nursing interventions that promote the resident's ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safety as possible. This concept actively focuses on achieving and maintaining optimal physical, mental, and psychosocial functioning; -Cognitive and physical function of all residents will be assessed in accordance with the facility's assessment protocols; -Residents, as identified during the comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident was seen by his/her physician within the first 30 days of admission to the facility (Resident #61). The sample was 17. The census was 69. Review of the facility's Physician Visits policy, undated, showed: -Policy Statement: The Attending Physician must make visits in accordance with applicable state and federal regulations; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation included; -The Attending Physician must visit his/her patients at least once every thirty (30) days for the first ninety (90) days following the resident's admission, and then at least every sixty (60) days thereafter; -A physician visit is considered timely if it occurs not later than ten (10) days after the date the visit was required. However, the subsequent visit must be timed in relation to when the previous one was due, not to when it was made. For example, if an individual is admitted on [DATE] and a visit that was due by March 31 is not made until April 8, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop policies to define the process for updating residents' code status. This failure resulted in facility staff's failure to follow one of four sampled resident's wishes for a do not resuscitate (DNR) code status and staff performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) when the resident was found unresponsive (Resident #1). The census was 72. Review of the facility's CPR policy, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to adhere to residents' rights to formulate advance directives. In accordance to these rights, this facility will implement guidelines regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); -Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: The facility will follow current American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines regarding CPR. If a resident experiences a cardiac arrest, facility staff will provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical services, and: in accordance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents with respect and dignity by leaving one resident exposed during personal care (Resident #22) and by standing while assisting residents with meals. The sample size was 18. The facility census was 84. 1. Review of Resident #22's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/7/19, showed the following: -No cognitive impairment; -Unable to ambulate; -Dependent on two staff members for transfers; -Extensive assistance required for bed mobility and toileting; -Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, chronic lung disease, muscle atrophy and morbid obesity. Review of the care plan, dated 5/15/19 and last updated 6/19/19, showed the following: -Problem: Resident is dependent for toileting; -Goal: Staff will provide incontinence care daily as needed; -Interventions: Cheerful dialogue while providing care to encourage and maintain self esteem, encourage to drink all fluids served during meals, offer a drink whenever…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-11-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans reflected residents' current needs by not updating them to include new/additional fall interventions. Staff also failed to address one resident's order to receive nothing by mouth (NPO), include a resident's risk of elopement and use of a wanderguard (a worn device which alerts staff of an attempted elopement) and the treatment and interventions for a resident's skin condition for four of 18 sampled residents (Residents #4, #1, #6 and #85). The census was 84. 1. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/18/19, showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Required extensive assistance from staff for transfers, toileting, personal hygiene and dressing; -Mobility devices used: [NAME] and wheelchair; -Any falls since prior assessment? No; -Diagnoses included: End stage renal disease, diabetes, dementia, Parkinson's disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed by not obtaining orders for a hand splint, the care of a gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube surgically inserted into the stomach to provide hydration, nutrition and medications), a suprapubic catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder through the abdominal wall to drain urine) and not documenting intake for a resident with a fluid restriction for four of 18 sampled residents (Residents #1, #61, #41 and #19). The census was 84. 1. Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 5/10/19, showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Dependent on staff for all mobility and personal hygiene; -Diagnoses included stroke, malnutrition, gastrostomy tube and aphasia (inability to produce and/or understand speech). Observations on 11/5/19 at 1:01 P.M., 11/6/19 at 6:26 A.M. and 1:12 P.M. and 11/7/19 at 5:03 A.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain adequate oral hygiene and nail care, including cleansing and trimming, for three of 18 sampled residents (Residents #1, #136 and #60). The census was 84. 1. Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 5/10/19, showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Dependent on staff for all mobility and personal hygiene; -Diagnoses included stroke, malnutrition, gastrostomy tube (g-tube, small tube surgically inserted through the abdomen in to the stomach to administer food and fluids) and aphasia (inability to produce and/or understand speech). Review of the care plan, dated 2/7/19 and last updated 3/12/19, showed the following: -Problem: Resident needs extensive to total dependence with all activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate and safe transfer techniques were used in the care of one resident (Resident #22) during one of four transfers observed. The facility also failed to prevent resident access to razors in three of four common shower rooms. This had the potential to affect all residents who were able to move freely around the facility. The census was 84. 1. Review of Resident #22's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/7/19, showed the following: -No cognitive impairment; -Unable to ambulate; -Dependent on two staff members for transfers; -Extensive assistance required for bed mobility and toileting; -Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, chronic lung disease, muscle atrophy and morbid obesity. Observation on 11/7/19 at 5:10 A.M., showed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) G provided the resident morning care and then assisted him/her to the side of the bed. CNA G retrieved the stand up lift (mechanical lift used to transfer someone from a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-11-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide thorough assessments, orders, monitoring and ongoing communication with the dialysis (the clinical purification of blood by dialysis as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney) center for two residents (Residents #69 and #19). Additionally, the facility had no contract with one of the dialysis providers (Resident #19). The facility identified four residents who received dialysis. Two of them were chosen for the sample of 18 and issues were found with both of them. The census was 84. 1. Review of Resident #69's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/20/19, showed the following: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Total dependence on staff for transfers, dressing and bathing; -Incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Received dialysis; -Diagnoses included anemia, high blood pressure, diabetes, high cholesterol, dementia, bipolar disorder, depression and chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-11-08 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enough dietary staff to effectively carry out food service in a timely manner and at appropriate times. The census was 84. Review of Resident Council minutes, showed the following: -August 2019, Dietary: Resident #62 said meals start increasingly late; another resident said weekend meal service was poor; -Issues addressed on the back of the minutes with a handwritten note by the administrator did not include late and poor meal service; -September 2019, Old business, dietary issues not addressed as old business; -Dietary: Resident #62 said, They are still serving way too late and missing one or more items on his/her tray; -Issues addressed on the back of the minutes with a handwritten note by the administrator, dietary manager has been on family leave and hopes to be back soon; -October 2019, Old business, no change in dining service or food; -Dietary: Resident #62 said, 'They are still serving way too late. [NAME] M is great and the new cook is also wonderful, food complaints are not about their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable when staff failed to follow recipes for the preparation of therapeutic pureed diets. The facility identified eight residents who received pureed diets. The census was 84. 1. Observation on 11/6/19 at 10:20 A.M., of pureed ravioli and meat sauce preparation, showed the following: - [NAME] L said he/she would make eight to 12 servings of pureed ravioli and meat sauce, took four slices of bread (one slice per serving) from a bag, tore it into pieces into the blender, turned the blender on and blended until breadcrumb consistency; -Cook L added three - 4 ounce scoops of ravioli and meat sauce to the blender; -Cook L poured in a small amount of prepared vegetable broth from a pitcher, turned the blender on, blended for approximately 30 seconds, added more vegetable broth and continued to blend until it reached proper consistency. The pureed ravioli and meat sauce had a heavy bread taste and did not taste like ravioli; -Cook L said he/she would repeat the same process two more times to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prevent a build up of frost and ice in the walk-in freezer by not repairing or replacing the freezer door, failed to date and cover food items in the refrigerator, keep a handwashing sink clean and ensure boxes were not stored on the floor in the freezer. The census was 84. 1. Observations of the kitchen on 11/5/19 at 10:25 A.M., 11/6/19 at 10:20 A.M., 11/7/19 at 10:58 A.M., and 11/8/19 at 12:30 P.M., showed the following: -The door to the walk-in freezer open, with an approximate 10 inch piece of rubber seal sticking out from the door, with the door unable to close. The inside shelves to the left of the door held frozen food products and were covered in a heavy build-up of frost and ice, ice on ceiling and floor and a lighter build-up of frost on the shelves and frozen food to the right of the freezer door. Approximately 8 cardboard boxes containing frozen food items sat on the floor in the freezer; -The handwashing sink smeared and with a build-up of grime. During an interview on 11/6/19 at 11:57 A.M., the maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used acceptable infection control procedures during blood sugar testing and incontinence care for one resident (Resident #70) of 18 sampled residents. The facility also failed to properly label, with a resident's name, a comb and brushes left in the community shower rooms, all of which contained hairs in the teeth/bristles. The facility census was 84. 1. Review of Resident #70's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 9/20/19, showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Dependent on staff for toileting, dressing and personal hygiene; -Incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Diagnoses included diabetes, seizures and altered mental status. Observation on 11/5/19 at 4:20 P.M., showed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C lay the glucometer (device used to check blood sugar) on a pair of gloves on top of the treatment cart, placed a glucostick (test strip) in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-08 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice, by failing to facilitate a resident's right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant to the resident when the facility staff opened and withheld resident mail without the resident's permission (Resident #79). Staff also failed to ensure the resident was served a diet in a texture he/she could chew. The sample size was 18. The census was 84. 1. Review of Resident #79's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 10/5/19, showed the following: -Cognitively intact; -Required total staff assistance for transfers, locomotion, toileting and bathing; -Required no assistance for eating; -Dental: left blank; -Diagnoses included neurogenic bladder (lack bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord or nerve problem), end stage renal disease, diabetes, stroke, leg paralysis and depression. Review of the resident's medical record, showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to assure that residents maintained and/or improved their highest level of range of motion and mobility by not providing restorative therapy to two of 18 sampled residents (Residents #136 and #41). The census was 84. 1. Review of Resident #136's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/1/19, showed the following: -admission date of 8/26/19; -Severely impaired cognition; -Diagnoses included right hip fracture and other fractures; -Required total assistance from staff with bed mobility, transfers and bathing; -Required extensive assistance from staff with dressing and toilet use; -Limited range of motion (ROM) affecting one side of the body, of the lower extremity; -Received skilled therapy services, physical and occupational. Review of the resident's physician's order sheet (POS), dated October 2019, showed the following: -An order dated 10/23/19, to discontinue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-01-19 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to post nurse staffing information on a daily basis, to include the total number of hours worked by categories of licensed staff, identifying Registered Nurse (RN) hours and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), directly responsible for resident care per shift. The census was 69. Review of the nurse staffing information, posted at the front entrance of the facility, on 1/16/24 at 6:34 A.M., showed: -The staffing sheet dated 1/12/24; -The categories included licensed nursing staff and unlicensed nursing staff for the day, evening, and night shift; -The staffing sheet did not identify the number of licensed nursing staff, LPN hours versus RN hours. During an interview on 1/19/24 at 9:51 A.M., the Director of Nurses said the Staffing Coordinator is responsible for posting the staffing information. During an interview on 1/19/24 at 10:19 A.M., the Staffing Coordinator said he is responsible for posting the staffing hours, but the receptionist is responsible for posting staffing information when he is off. He was not aware the nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2019-11-08 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue a written transfer/discharge notice to the resident and/or resident's representative, when transferred to the hospital for various medical reasons for three sampled residents (Residents #4, #1 and #56). The sample was 18. The census was 84. 1. Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, admission and discharge assessments, showed the following; -admission date of 2/4/10; -Discharge to the hospital 4/5/19; -readmission to the facility 4/13/19; -Discharge to the hospital 4/13/19; -readmission to the facility 4/22/19; -No documentation the resident and/or their representative received written notice of the resident's transfers. 2. Review of Resident #1's MDS admission and discharge assessments, showed the following: -admitted to the facility 6/19/18; -Discharge to the hospital 8/8/19; -readmission to the facility 8/16/19; -No documentation the resident and/or their representative received written notice of the resident's transfer. 3. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2019-11-08 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice of the facility's bed hold policy to residents or their legal representatives, at the time of the transfers, for three sampled residents who were transferred to the hospital for medical reasons (Residents #4, #1 and #56). The census was 84. 1. Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, admission and discharge assessments, showed the following; -admission date of 2/4/10; -Discharge to the hospital 4/5/19; -readmission to the facility 4/13/19; -Discharge to the hospital 4/13/19; -readmission to the facility 4/22/19; -No documentation the resident and/or their representative received written notice of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer. 2. Review of Resident #1's medical record, showed the following: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Discharge to the hospital on 8/8/19; -readmission to the facility on 8/16/19; -No documentation the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$183,665 in federal fines across 7 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $134,043 — penalty dated 2025-01-21
- $26,687 — penalty dated 2024-01-19
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-02-25 for 14 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-17 for 19 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MARK TWAIN HOLDCO LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 10/01/2025 |
| DELTA EDGE STRATEGIC ADVISORS | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| HHHH VENTURES LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| KRPSS PARTNERS | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| FELHEIM, YITCHOK | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 10/01/2025 |
| JACOBOVITCH, YOSSI | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/01/2025 |
| LAPCIUC, AVRAHAM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/01/2025 |
| BICKNELL, JACQUELINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/06/2025 |
| SAN, MANUEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| STERLING, CORY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/06/2025 |
| NBH1 MTPROPCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $537K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265236. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.