St Luke's Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 92 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 84.6 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-05-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure meals were served at a palatable temperature when staff failed to verify temperature of food to ensure proper holding temperature prior to starting meal service resulting in cold food not held at 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or lower. The facility had a census of 64. Review of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) website, food safety basics section titled, Danger Zone (40 degrees F to 140 degrees F), revised 06/28/17, showed the following information: -Cold food is to be kept at 40 degrees Fahrenheit or lower and placed in containers on ice; -Bacteria grows most rapidly in temperature ranges between 40 degrees F and 140 degrees F. Review of a facility policy titled Food Handling, dated 01/20/15, showed the following information: -Hot food is to be held at a minimum of 135 degrees F or higher; -Cold food is to be held at a minimum of 41 degrees F or lower; -Dietary staff were responsible for maintaining food temperature and documenting on temperature logs. 1. Review of the facility menu,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-09 · tag F0868 — widespread
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to maintain quarterly Quality Assessment Committee (QAA) meetings with the required members when the Medical Director did not attend the QAA meetings. The facility census was 64. Review of the facility's Quality Assurance Committee policy, dated 06/11/07, showed the following: -Purpose to set forth guidelines for the formation and maintenance of a Quality Assurance Committee. -The Quality Assurance Committee will audit criteria in each department that are set by the committee which review work processes and procedures. These audits will be performed monthly by the department head; -The Quality Assurance Committee shall consist of the following membership: the administrator, the director of nursing (DON), the social service director (SSD), the activities director (AD), the dietary supervisor (DS), the laundry/housekeeping supervisor (LKS), the maintenance supervisor (MS) and the medical director (MD); -The Quality Assurance Committee will meet routinely the second Tuesday of each month; -This meeting is attended by all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-09 · tag F0576 — pattern
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure each resident's right to receive mail correspondence timely was honored when staff failed to provide mail delivered on Saturdays to residents timely. The facility census was 64. Review of the facility did not provide a policy addressing delivery of mail to residents on the weekend. 1. During the resident council meeting on 05/06/25, at 2:00 P.M., the residents in attendance said mail was only delivered to residents Monday through Friday and was not delivered to the residents on the weekends. The residents said they would like to receive any mail that comes in on Saturdays if possible. The residents said mail was only delivered on Saturdays if the Activity Director was working as the weekend department head. No other staff deliver mail to residents on Saturdays. During an interview on 05/08/25, at 11:30 A.M., Activity Assistant I said he/she works days Monday through Thursday. He/she does not pass the mail to the residents. The Activity Director passes mail during the week. During an interview on 05/08/25, at 11:40…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet all residents' interests when staff failed to ensure an variety of activities were provided by facility staff on the weekends. A sample of 19 residents and the group interview of seven residents were selected in a facility with a census of 64. Review of the facility's current policy related to activities showed it did not address activities provided by staff for the residents on the weekend. 1. During the group interview on 05/06/25, starting at 2:07 P.M., residents said the following: -The only activity during weekends was bingo on Saturdays; -This activity was run by another resident (Resident #7) in the facility; -The Activity Director and activity assistants do not work weekends; -Resident #7 said if he/she overslept or was sick then there was no Bingo or activity for that Saturday; -The residents said the only thing going on Sundays was church; -The residents said they get bored on weekends and would like more scheduled activities for Saturdays…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible abuse were reported to the state licensing agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) when staff failed to report a resident to resident allegation of physical abuse between two residents (Resident #26 and #32). The facility had a census of 64. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation, and Injury of Unknown Origin Policy, dated June 2023, showed the following: -Facility policy is to prohibit all forms of abuse, neglect, and exploitation of any resident; -Any suspicion or allegation of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of patient property or funds will be reported immediately and investigated thoroughly; -Staff will notify the Administrator and/or Director of Nursing (DON) immediately, within 15 minutes of the alleged incident; -If the nature of the incident is unclear or is suspicious of abuse, neglect, misappropriation, or injury of unknown origin, DHSS will be notified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards when staff failed to use a gait belt (a safety device used to provide support when transferring a person from one position to another) when transferring and assisting one resident (Resident #40), with a history of falls, to toilet. The facility census was 64. The Administrator was notified on the morning of 11/15/24 of the Past Non-Compliance which occurred on 11/15/24. Staff completed an investigation into the cause of the fall and complete counseling with the involved staff member on 11/18/24. Inservices with all nursing staff were also conducted on 11/18/24. The noncompliance was corrected on 12/17/24. Review of the facility's policy titled Incidents and Accident, dated 03/06/07, showed the following: -Purpose was to prevent falls and to provide the resident with a sense of security; -Equipment and supplies necessary when assisting residents to the bathroom included a gait belt; -Assist the resident to a standing position, move slowly, and allow the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2023-07-17 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's choice of code status (if the resident wished to receive assistance if his/her heart stopped beating or he/she stopped breathing) was easily accessible to staff in the event of an emergency and failed to ensure the status matched throughout the medical record for three residents (Residents #23, #12 and #125), out of seven sampled residents. The facility census was 74. Review showed the facility did not provide a written policy regarding the documentation of residents' preferred code status. 1. Review of Resident #23's face sheet (gives basic profile information) showed the following information: -admission date of [DATE]; -Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (a potentially disabling disease of the brain and spinal cord (central nervous system)), major depressive disorder, mood disorder due to known physiological condition with depressive features, and pain. Review of the resident's face sheet showed the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-07-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to use appropriate infection control procedures to prevent the spread of bacteria or other infectious carrying contaminants, when staff failed to complete appropriate hand hygiene during wound care for three residents (Resident #41, #22, and #17) and during incontinent care for one resident (Resident #35). The facility census was 74. Review of the facility provided policy, Hand Hygiene, dated 11/02/19, showed the following: -Alcohol based hand sanitizers are the most effective products for reducing the number of germs on the hands of healthcare providers and are the preferred method of cleaning your hands in most clinical settings; -The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene; -Staff should perform hand hygiene with alcohol based hand sanitizer during routine care, immediately before touching a resident, before performing an aseptic task, before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same resident, after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-17 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to give written transfer notice to the resident and/or resident's representative for two residents (Residents #45 and #69) who were transferred out to the hospital. A sample of two residents were reviewed in a facility with a census of 74. Review of a facility policy entitled Notice of Hospital Transfer/Room Hold Policy, dated 04/08/19, showed when staff send a resident to the hospital, the discharging nurse will give the resident a copy of the Notice of Hospital Transfer and Bed Hold Authorization which should contain/involve the following: -The resident's name is to be written on the first line; -The current room rates are to be entered on the appropriate lines; -The reason for transfer is to be written on the lines at the bottom of the form in language the resident can understand; -Two copies are to be made of the form. One is to be placed in the resident's chart under the miscellaneous tab, and the other is to be placed in the Director of Nursing (DON) bin at the nurses' station; -The original is to be sent to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-17 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents or responsible parties received a written notice of the bed-hold policy upon transfer, when staff failed to provide two residents (Residents #45 and #69) of two sampled residents written notices of the facility's bed-hold policy when transferred to the hospital. The facility census was 74. Review of a facility policy entitled Notice of Hospital Transfer/Room Hold Policy, dated 04/08/19, showed the following: -All residents/responsible parties/representatives will be made aware of the facility room hold policy at the time of admission; -When a resident is sent to the hospital, the discharging nurse will give the resident a copy of the Notice of Hospital Transfer and Bed Hold Authorization that will include the resident's name is to be written on the first line and current room rates; -A call will be made to the resident's responsible party/representative within 24 hours of the discharge to the hospital by the charge nurse on weekends and by Transitional Care or Nursing Management during the week…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO