No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Arbor View Nursing And Rehabilitation

6400 The Cedars Court, Cedar Hill, MO 63016 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 150 certified beds · (636) 274-1777 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$29,491 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $29,491 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-13)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Comtrea7.3 mi
100 Osage Executive Cir · (636) 677-9977 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7032 MO-BB · (636) 274-3111 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7030 MO-BB · (636) 285-5588 · Call to confirm hours
Park
6801 Cedar Hill Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
8420 Brackman Ave · (636) 285-9599

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.3%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.6%5.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.0%2.3%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms72.9%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.1%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.2%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication40.2%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.7%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.6%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.9%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.8%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.0%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine47.2%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.4%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.7%13.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.342.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.052.331.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.1%CMS range 27.3–55.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 8.3–16.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge37.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened13.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.0%CMS range 4.9–14.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.971.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
0.63
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.51
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.47
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
53.8%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 94.4 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 56 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.51 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.62 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-02)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the potential spread of COVID-19 (an acute respiratory illness in humans caused by the coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2) and other infections, when staff failed to follow acceptable infection control practices for COVID-19. The facility failed to separate six residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, and #6) who tested positive for COVID-19 from six residents (Resident #7, #8, #9, #10, #11 and #12) who had tested negative for COVID-19, which placed the residents at an increased risk of contracting COVID-19 due to prolonged exposure. The facility census was 85. The Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist were notified on 10/13/23 at 04:00 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 10/01/23. The IJ was removed on 10/13/23, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a proper transfer from the chair to the bed for one resident (Resident #1), of four sampled residents. The facility census was 83.The facility did not provide a safe transfer policy and procedure.Observation of a video, dated 09/27/2025, from a camera in Resident #1's room, showed:At 8:08 P.M, Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) entered the resident's room and removed the foot pedals attached to the Geri-chair Resident #1 reclined in. Resident #1 begins to scream, kick out at the CNA;CNA A leaves and comes back with Certified Medication Technician (CMT) B;The resident begins to scream;As the resident continues to scream and thrash his/her extremities, CNA A lifts the resident by the back of the resident's pants while CMT B holds the resident's arms together, lifting the resident from the Geri-chair to directly over the bed. CNA A and CMT B release the resident quickly into the bed.Review of Resident #1's admission assessment showed:The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-02 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a clinically qualified nutritional professional designated as the Food and Nutritional Service Manager for one of one food service kitchens, which prepared food for all residents. This deficient practice potentially affected all of the residents who were served food prepared by the facility. The facility's census was 86. Review of the facility policy titled, Qualified Dietary Staff, dated 10/01/23, showed: -The dietary/ food services department is staffed by dietary/ food and nutrition services personnel to meet the needs of the residents and the skilled Dietitian will help oversee the dietary/ food and nutrition services in the facility; -The Dietitian or nutrition professional may be full time or part time consultant or an employee, depending on the current requirements of the facility; -The qualifications of the Dietitian will include a bachelor's degree from a regionally accredited college with successful completion of a nationally accredited program in nutrition or dietetics, completion of at least 900 hours of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. This deficiency had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 86. The facility did not provide a RN coverage policy. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment Tool, dated 4/10/24, showed: - The facility required five licensed nurses providing direct care for day shift, which included at least one RN for the day shift. Review of the Nursing Schedules and the Daily Nursing Staffing Sheets for 01/01/25 - 03/31/25, showed: - No RN coverage for eight consecutive hours on 01/06/25, 01/23/25, 01/24/25, 01/27/25, 01/30/25, 01/31/25, 02/03/25, 02/06/25, and 02/07/25; - No RN coverage for eight consecutive worked for nine days out of 90 days. During an interview on 04/02/25 at 3:05 P.M., the Administrator said she would expect the facility to have an RN working eight consecutive hours daily seven days a week.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to create an environment that was respectful of the rights of each resident to make choices about aspects of their lives that were significant by providing a bathing schedule based on staff preference and not resident preference for one resident (Resident #1) and by failing to honor one resident's (Resident #24) preference to be shaved daily out of 18 sampled residents . The facility's census was 86. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, Dignity and Visitation Rights, dated 04/01/22, showed: - It will be the policy of this facility that employees shall treat residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. The facility promotes the exercise of rights for each resident, including any who face barriers (such as communication problems, hearing problems, and cognition limits) in the exercise of these rights. The facility will ensure the resident can exercise his/her rights without interference, coercion, discrimination, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a final accounting of a resident's fund balance within 30 days to the individual or probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate for one expired resident (Resident #87) out of one expired resident. The facility census was 86. The facility did not provide a policy regarding resident funds balance. Review of Resident #87's medical record showed: - The resident expired on [DATE]. Record of the facility maintained Trust Trial Balance, dated [DATE], showed: - Resident #87 with an account balance of $2,694. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:03 A.M., the Social Services Designee (SSD) said normally if someone passed away, their money would go towards any funeral home bills. If the resident had a financial power of attorney (POA), then they would get them a check for the balance and if not, they would send the money to the state. The facility tried to do this process within a week of a death. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:24 A.M., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and keep one resident's (Resident #54) equipment in good, working order. The facility also failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 86. The facility did not provide a policy regarding a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility did not provide a policy regarding maintenance of residents' equipment. 1. Observation on 03/30/25 at 10:56 A.M., of Room C9 showed: - A window unit below the window with drywall placed around the top and both sides that did not completely in case the window unit. There were open areas to the top and right side of the unit with light from the outside that showed around the top of the unit. There was insulation pushed in an open area directly above the window unit to cover a gap from the window unit to the drywall nailed in place around the window unit. The top opening was approximately 32 inches (in) by 1 in and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of a transfer or discharge to a hospital, including the reasons for transfer, for five residents (Residents #11, #12, #38, #46, and #59) out of 18 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #44) outside the sample. The facility's census was 86. Review of the facility policy titled, Transfer and Discharge, dated 04/01/22, showed: - It is the policy of this facility to provide appropriate transfer and discharge services, documentation that will be included in the medical record, and who is responsible for making the documentation. The facility will allow for sufficient preparation and orientation by informing the resident where he/she is going to take steps to minimize anxiety; - The Notice of Transfer or Discharge should be made by the facility at least 30 days before the resident is transferred or discharged except under the following circumstances and the Notice must be made as soon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notification of their bed hold policy to the residents and/or their resident representatives at the time of transfer for four residents (Residents #11, #12, #38, and #46) out of 18 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #44) outside the sample. The facility census was 86. Review of the facility policy titled, Bed Hold, dated 04/01/22, showed: - It will be the policy of this facility to provide residents with bed hold policies upon admission to the facility and at the time of transfer (i.e. when transferring to hospital or going on therapeutic leave) in accordance with federal and state regulations; - The initial bed hold policy should be provided to the resident/responsible party as soon after admission as possible when completing the admission packet to the facility. Should specify duration of the bed hold policy under the State Plan, if any, during which the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess, and provide supportive interventions for one resident (Resident #78) with a diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event - either experiencing it or witnessing it; symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares and severe anxiety, as well as uncontrollable thoughts about the event) out of three sampled residents. The facility's census was 86. Review of the facility's policy titled, Mental and Psychosocial Adjustment Services, dated 04/01/22, showed: - It is the policy of the facility to ensure (based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident) that a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or PTSD, receives appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being; - Residents who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the nurse aides (NAs) an annual individual performance review or evaluation and failed to provide regular in-service education based on these reviews for two certified nursing assistants (CNAs) (CNA A and CNA B). The facility census was 86. Review of the Facility Assessment Tool, dated 04/10/24, showed: - A facility must develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff; - In-service training must address areas of weakness as determined in NA's performance reviews; - In-service training may address the special needs of residents as determined by the facility staff. 1. Review of CNA A's employee file showed: - A hire date of 09/15/08; - No documentation of an annual performance review or evaluation; - No documentation of annual in-service training based on the annual performance review or evaluation for the time frame from 09/15/23 through 09/15/24. 2. Review of CNA B's employee file showed: - A hire date of 06/10/21; - No documentation of an annual performance review or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 44 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for two residents (Residents #21 and #36) out of five sampled residents. The facility's census was 86. Review of the facility policy titled, Pharmacist Recommendations, dated 04/01/22, showed: - It will be the policy of this facility to provide pharmacist services to meet the needs of the residents through monthly regimen review (MRR) and properly addressing recommendations per federal and state guidelines; - The drug regimen of each resident must be reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist. This review must include a review of the resident's medical chart. An electronic medication regimen review will be performed within 72 hours of admission for newly admitted residents, or as soon as reasonably possible; - The pharmacist must report any irregularities to the attending physician or Licensed Independent Practitioner (LIP) and the facility's Medical Director and Director of Nursing (DON), and these reports must be acted upon as soon as reasonably able, but prior to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure bedtime snacks had been offered to all residents at bedtime. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 86. Review of the facility policy titled, Nutrition and Hydration Assistance, dated 04/01/22, showed: - Additional sources of nourishment should/may include provision of snacks; - Staff will make provision for appropriate snacks as requested or ordered by the physician. Review of the facility policy titled, Provide Diet to Meets Needs of Each Resident, dated 04/01/22, showed: - The facility would provide the services of a Registered Dietitian Nutritionalist or designee to participate in the interdisciplinary care planning team and assure that the nutritional needs of individuals living in the facility are met. Review of the meal times, as provided by the facility, showed breakfast was served at 7:30 A.M., lunch was served at 11:30 A.M., and dinner was served at 4:30 P.M. with a 16 hour gap between each dinner and breakfast. During group interview on 03/31/25 at 1:20 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. The facility failed to ensure that foods were kept covered while waiting to be served and had policies and procedures in place for food brought in from outside the facility. These practices had the potential to affect all residents who are served food from the kitchen. The facility census was 86. Review of the facility policy titled,Food Delivery and Storage, dated 10/01/23, showed: - It will be the policy of this facility that foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices; - Dietary/Food Services, or other designated staff, will maintain clean food storage areas at all times; - Dry foods that are stored in bins will be removed from original packaging, labeled and dated. Such foods will be rotated using a first in - first out system; - All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled, and dated. 1. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain or implement a policy regarding the acceptance, usage, and storage of foods brought into the facility for residents by food delivery services, family, and/or other visitors, to ensure the food's safe and sanitary handling, storage, and consumption. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who ate food brought in by visitors. The facility census was 86. Review of the facility form titled, Resident Responsibilities and Rules, Appendix 4, undated, showed: - Food may be brought into our facility; - It must be kept in airtight containers; - Because of diet restrictions, nursing staff should be made aware of any food brought into the facility; - Should food need to be monitored, it will be kept in a designated room; - The policy did not address how facility staff will assist the resident in accessing and consuming the food brought in by visitors in a way that either separates or easily distinguishes from the facility food. Observation on 03/31/25 at 10:45 P.M., a refrigerator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in a safe and operable working condition. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 86. The facility did not provide a policy for equipment maintenance. Review of the following invoices showed: - On 12/16/24, an invoice for a laundry washer was serviced but no details of actions taken; - On 12/30/24, an invoice for a laundry washer was serviced with a valve and hose replaced. Observation on 04/02/25 at 9:40 A.M. of the laundry room, showed: - Three commercial laundry washing machines; - Two of the machines were covered in dust and debris and not in use; - The third machine was running a load of laundry. On top of the third machine was a plastic cup marked with a black line which indicated the fill line for bleach to pour into each load of laundry. During an interview on 04/02/25 at 9:40 A.M., Laundry Aide (LA) K said he/she had been a laundry employee for over a year and in that time, only one of the three washing machines had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and functional environment for the residents by allowing items to be stored on top of the overbed light fixtures for residents in three rooms. Storing items on the overbed light creates a hazard of the items falling on the resident below, and does not utilize the light fixtures as intended. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and staff in the facility. The facility census was 86. The facility did not provide a policy regarding storing items on the overbed light fixtures. 1. Observation on 03/03/25 at 2:39 P.M., of Room B 5-1 showed a large picture in a wooden frame on the light above the resident's bed. 2. Observation on 03/31/25 at 11:09 P.M., of Room C 8-2 showed three medium sized stuffed animals, two medium glass figurines, and two small plastic animals on the light fixture above the bed on the left side of the room. 3. Observation on 04/01/25 at 1:00 P.M., of Room C 10-2 showed two large stuffed animals and three medium sized stuffed animals on the light fixture above the bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct at least twelve hours of nurse aide (NA) in-service education per year. This affected two Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) (CNA A and CNA B) out of two sampled CNAs. The facility's census was 86. The facility did not provide a policy regarding annual NA education. 1. Review of CNA A's employee file showed: - A hire date of 09/15/08; - A total of 2 hours 50 minutes of annual in-service training completed for the time frame of September 2023 through September 2024; - The facility failed to provide at least 12 hours of in-service education for September 2023 through September 2024. 2. Review of CNA B's employee file showed: - A hire date of 06/10/21; - A total of 5 hours 45 minutes of annual in-service training for June 2023 through June 2024; - The facility failed to provide at least 12 hours of in-service education for June 2023 through June 2024. During an interview on 04/02/25 at 3:05 P.M., the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) said they would expect CNAs to receive at least 12 hours of training…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent resident care for activities of daily living (ADLs) when the residents went an extended amount of time without showers for three residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3) out of 6 sampled residents. The facility's census was 92. The facility did not provide a policy regarding showers. 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record showed: - An admission date of 07/26/24; - Diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with acute exacerbation (disease that makes breathing difficult), type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (trouble controlling blood sugar), need for assistance with personal care, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions (a condition where psychological distress manifests as physical symptoms, including seizures), and Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia (Parkinson's without involuntary movements). Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to properly maintain the temperature of hot food at or above 120 Degrees Fahrenheit (°F) for 12 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, and #12), out of 12 sampled residents, at the time of meal service and failed to implement a system to monitor food temperatures at the time of service. Failure to maintain foods at the proper temperature has the potential to affect all residents receiving meal trays. The facility's census was 94. Review of the Missouri Food Code for the Food Establishments of the State of Missouri, provided by the facility and dated June 3, 2013, showed: - Refrigerated, potentially hazardous food shall be at a temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below when received; - Potentially hazardous food that is cooked to a temperature and for a time specified under section 3-4.11-3.401.13 and received hot shall be at a temperature of 135 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility did not provide a policy related to food service tray temperatures or a system of monitoring food tray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for one resident (Resident #1) out of eleven sampled residents when Resident #1 did not receive five doses of his/her seizure medication. The facility census was 87. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration, dated 09/01/22, showed: - Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection; - Correct any discrepancies and report to the nurse manager; - The policy did not address what to do if the medication was not available. 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record showed: - admission date of 06/19/24; - Diagnoses of epilepsy (a neurological condition characterized by recurrent seizures due to abnormal electrical activity in the brain), history of malignant neoplasm of the brain (brain cancer), diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to protect the rights of four of six sampled residents (Residents #1, #2, #3 and #4) by establishing a practice of revoking the resident's right to temporarily leave the facility by a physician's order for residents who are their own person, in response to that resident not following the rules established in the newly updated admission policy. The facility census was 86. Review of the facility's policy titled, Possession and/or use of Illegal Substances, Marijuana, and Alcohol, dated 2/1/2023 and updated 6/5/2024, showed: - If the facility staff identifies items or substances that pose risks to residents' health and safety and are in plain view, staff will confiscate them and alert their immediate supervisor; - The staff will notify resident's attending physician if resident is found with or suspected to be displaying signs/symptoms of being under the influence of illegal substance, alcohol, and/or marijuana to determine necessary interventions and/or medications/treatments they may need to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility failed to protect the rights of one of the six sampled residents (Resident #1) by prohibiting the visitation of a family member based on the facility's assumption that the family member was in possession of Marijuana. The census was 86. Record review of the policy on Possession and/or use of Illegal Substances, Marijuana, and Alcohol dated 2/1/2023 and updated 6/5/2024, showed: - If the facility staff identifies items or substances that pose risks to residents ' health and safety and are in plain view, they will confiscate them and alert their immediate supervisor; - The staff will notify resident ' s attending physician if resident if found with or suspected to be displaying signs/symptoms or being under the influence of illegal substance, alcohol, and /or marijuana to determine necessary interventions and/or medications/treatments they may need to hold; - The facility and/or physician also reserves the right to conduct alcohol and drug testing, suspend or discontinue out of facility pass (LOA); - In order to maintain and ensure the health and safety of the resident,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe smoking interventions for two residents (Resident #48 and #336) out of four sampled residents who smoke and four residents (Resident #24, #73, #76, and #80) outside the sample. The facility census was 83. Review of the facility's policy, Resident Smoking, revised 03/03/22, showed: - This facility provides a safe and healthy environment for residents, visitors, and employees, including safety as related to smoking. Safety protections apply to smoking and non-smoking residents; - Any resident who is deemed safe to smoke, with or without supervision, will be allowed to smoke in designated smoking areas (weather permitting), at designated times, and in accordance with his/her care plan; - Safe smoking measures will be documented on each resident's care plan and communicated to staff, visitors, and volunteers who will be responsible for supervising residents while smoking. Supervision will be provided as indicated on each resident's care plan; - Smoking materials of residents requiring supervision with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. These practices had the potential to affect all residents who are served food from the kitchen. The facility census was 83. Review of the facility's policy, Food Safety Requirement, dated 09/01/21, showed: - It is the policy of this facility to procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory by the federal, state, and local authorities; - Food will also be stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. 1. Observation on 06/04/24 at 12:14 P.M., 06/05/24 at 12:14 P.M. and on 06/06/2024 at 10:45 P.M. of the walk-in refrigerator showed dirt and debris in the bottom of the refrigerator. 2. Observation on 06/04/24 at 12:14 P.M., 06/05/24 at 12:14 P.M. and on 06/06/2024 at 10:45 P.M. of the walk-in freezer showed: - Food items not labeled or dated, including bags of corn on the cob, meat, and cinnamon rolls; - Dirt and debris in the bottom…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation of on-going assessments, monitoring, and communication between the facility and the dialysis (a process for removing waste and excess water from the blood) center for one resident (Resident #14) out of one sampled resident. The facility's census was 83. Review of the facility's policy, Dialysis Care Guidelines, revised 03/15/24, showed: - Communication between the dialysis provider and center staff should included written communication that includes daily weights, changes in condition or mood, response to treatment, and evaluation of the vascular site; - Whether resident receives hemodialysis out of center or receives dialysis in house, communication is essential for continuity of care; - Be cognizant of medications ordered and timing of administration; - If resident is feeling ill or exhibiting unusual symptoms before the scheduled session, communicate symptoms to the out patient dialysis center and physician to ascertain if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the dumpsters were closed at all times and maintained to keep pests out and to keep the garbage contained in the dumpster. The facility census was 83. The facility did not provide a sanitation policy. Observations of the dumpster, located in front of the facility, showed: - On 06/06/24 at 8:05 A.M., the dumpster with the lid opened with visible bags and other miscellaneous items; - On 06/6/24 at 1:00 P.M., the dumpster with the lid opened with visible bags and other miscellaneous items; - On 06/6/24 at 4:10 P.M., the dumpster with the lid opened with visible bags and other miscellaneous items; - On 06/07/24 at 8:15 A.M., the dumpster with the lid opened. During an interview on 06/07/24 at 10:00 A.M., the Dietary Manager said she would expect staff to ensure the trash dumpster lids are closed after staff discard trash and other miscellaneous items. Housekeeping is also responsible for disposing of trash in the dumpsters. During an interview on 06/07/24 at 10:49 A.M., the Housekeeping and Laundry Manager said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices to prevent the development and transmission of infection for one resident (Resident #336) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility's census was 83. Review of the facility's policy, Infection Prevention and Control Program, revised 05/15/23, showed: - All reusable items and equipment requiring special cleaning, disinfection, or sterilization shall be cleaned in accordance with our current procedures governing the cleaning and sterilization of soiled or contaminated equipment; - All staff shall demonstrate competence in relevant infection control practices; - Direct care staff shall demonstrate competence in resident care procedures established by our facility; - Hand hygiene shall be performed in accordance with our facility's established hand hygiene procedures. Review of the facility's policy, Hand Hygiene, dated 09/01/21, showed: - Staff will perform hand hygiene when indicated, using proper technique consistent with accepted standards of practice; - Hand hygiene is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to control the fly population in the facility. This practice had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 83. Review of the facility's policy titled, Pest Control Program, revised 09/01/22, showed an effective pest control program is defined as measures to eradicate and control and contain common household pests (bed bugs, lice, roaches, ants, mosquitos, flies, mice, and rats). Review of the facility's Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines, dated 09/21/21 and revised on 09/01/22, showed: - Facility will maintain a written agreement with a qualified outside pest service to provide comprehensive pest control services on a regular and scheduled basis; - Facility will ensure that appropriate chemicals are used to control pests, but can be used safely inside the building without compromising resident health; - Facility will maintain a report system of issues that may arise in between scheduled visits with the outside pest service and treat as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances for two of three sampled residents (Residents #1 and #2), and had the potential to effect all residents of the facility. The census was 96. Record review of the facility's policy titled Resident and Family Concerns/Complaints, dated 1/4/2022 showed: - The Concern/Complaint Officer is responsible for overseeing the concern/complaint process, receiving and tracking complaints and concerns through to their conclusion; - Concerns/Complaints may be verbal or written; - All staff involved shall make efforts to resolve quickly; - The investigation shall include: - The date and time of the alleged incident; - The circumstances surrounding the alleged incident; - The location of the alleged incident; - The names of any witnesses; - The resident's account of the alleged incident; - The employee's account of the alleged incident; - Recommedications for a corrective action. - The written decision will include at a minimum: - The date received; - The steps taken to investigate; - A summary of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. This potentially affected all residents. The facility census was 94. Record review of the facility's General Sanitation of the Kitchen policy, revised July 2019, showed: - Food and nutrition services staff will maintain the sanitation of the kitchen through compliance with a written, comprehensive cleaning schedule; - Cleaning and sanitation tasks for the kitchen will be outlined in a written cleaning schedule; - Tasks will be assigned to be the responsibility of specific positions; - Frequency of cleaning for each task will be defined; - Employees will be trained on how to perform cleaning tasks; - On the cleaning schedule, employees will initial and date tasks when completed. 1. Observations of the kitchen on 11/29/22 at 11:20 A.M. and 12:11 P.M., showed: - A black griddle on top of the stove with a buildup of a hard black crusty substance; - Two black griddles on the bottom shelf by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean and comfortable homelike environment. The facility census was 94. Record review of the facility's Preventative Maintenance Program policy, revised November 2017, showed: - A Preventative Maintenance Program shall be developed and implemented to ensure the provisions of a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public; - The Maintenance Director will be responsible for developing and maintaining a schedule for maintenance services to ensure that the buildings, grounds, and equipment will be maintained in a safe and operable manner; - The Maintenance Director shall assess all aspects of the physical plant to determine if preventative maintenance will be required; - If preventative maintenance will be required, the Maintenance Director shall decide what tasks need to be completed and how often to complete them; - The Maintenance Director shall develop a calendar to assist with keeping track of all tasks; - Documentation shall be completed for all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-06 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of the notice for transfer or discharge to the resident and or the resident's representative, for six residents (Resident #15, #16, #17, #36, #66 and #70) out of seven sampled residents. The facility's census was 94. Record review of the Transfer and Discharge Policy, dated 9/22/22, showed: - Emergency Transfers/Discharges - initiated by the facility for medical reasons to an acute care setting such as a hospital, for the immediate safety and welfare of a resident (nursing responsibilities unless otherwise specified); - Obtain physician's orders for emergency transfer or discharge, stating the reason the transfer or discharge shall be necessary on an emergency basis; - The original copies of the transfer form and the Advance Directive accompany the resident. Copies will be retained in the medical record; - Provide orientation for transfer or discharge to minimize anxiety and to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge, in a form and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to utilize proper technique during catheter (a tube inserted into the urinary bladder to drain the bladder) care for three residents (Resident #13, #41, and #66) out of three sampled residents, incontinent care for one resident (Resident # 25) out of two sampled residents, and wound care for one resident (Resident #13) out of a two sampled residents. The facility failed to maintain infection control practices for six residents (Resident #1, #9, #42, #44, #80, and #196 ) out of eight sampled residents during medication administration when facility staff did not wash or sanitize hands or touched medication with bare hands. The facility failed to ensure in the prevention of communicable disease in regards to Tuberculosis (TB) (a communicable disease that affects the lungs characterized by fever, cough and difficulty breathing) by not completing the admission TB screening and/or a yearly risk assessment for symptoms for five residents (Resident #16, #25, #26, #61, and #86) out of five sampled residents.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-06 · tag F0924 — pattern
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the handrails on the A, C, D and E Halls were properly maintained. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents on these halls. The facility census was 94. Record review of the facility's Preventative Maintenance Program policy, revised November 2017, showed: - A Preventative Maintenance Program shall be developed and implemented to ensure the provisions of a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public; - The Maintenance Director will be responsible for developing and maintaining a schedule for maintenance services to ensure that the buildings, grounds, and equipment will be maintained in a safe and operable manner; - The Maintenance Director shall assess all aspects of the physical plant to determine if preventative maintenance should be required; - If preventative maintenance should be required, the Maintenance Director shall decide what tasks need to be completed and how often to complete them; - The Maintenance Director shall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents with dignity and in a respectful manner by leaving one resident (Resident #25) out of 20 sampled residents exposed after staff left the resident's room. The census was 94. Record review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, dated 9/1/21, showed: - The resident with the right to be treated with respect and dignity; - Personal privacy includes accommodations, medical treatment, written and telephone communications, personal care, visits and meetings. 1. Observation of Resident #25 showed: - On 11/29/22 at 2:39 P.M., the resident lay in bed with the door open, in a shirt and brief, and uncovered; - On 11/20/22 at 3:45 P.M., the resident lay in bed with the door open, in a shirt and brief, and uncovered; - The resident visible from the hallway. Record review of the resident's medical record showed: - Diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease (progressive mental deterioration), cognitive communication defect, and urinary incontinence; - Severe cognitive impairment. Record review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the code status (the type of emergent treatment a person would or wouldn't receive if their heart or breathing were to stop) for two residents (Resident #26 and #52) out of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 94. Record review of the facility's Residents' Rights Regarding Advance Directives (a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment) policy, revised on [DATE], showed: - The facility will support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive; - On admission, the facility will determine if the resident has executed an advance directive, and if not, determine whether the resident would like to formulate an advance directive; - Upon admission, should the resident have an advance directive, copies will be made and placed on the chart as well as communicated to the staff; - Decisions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident's legal representative of their bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for two residents (Resident #36 and #66) out of seven sampled residents. The facility's census was 94. Record review of the facility's Bed Hold policy, revised April 2017, showed: - The bed hold policy will be reviewed with the resident, designated family member, and/or the resident's legal representative; - Before a resident will be transferred to a hospital or goes on therapeutic leave, a written Bed Hold policy will be given to the resident, designated family member, and/or the resident's legal representative; - In case of an emergency transfer, the resident, designated family member, and/or the resident's legal representative will be issued a copy of the Bed Hold policy within 24 hours by sending a copy with the resident's records at the time of the transfer. 1. Record review of Resident #36's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document a complete and accurate Minimal Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment to be completed by the facility, for three residents (Resident #16, #46, and #86) out of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 94. Record review of the facility's Resident Assessment - Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) policy, revised 8/18/2022, showed: - This facility makes a comprehensive assessment instrument of each resident's needs, strengths, goals, life history and preferences using the RAI specified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). - The results of the assessment will be used to develop, review, and revise the resident's comprehensive care plan. 1. Observation of Resident #16 on 11/29/22 at 2:51 P.M. showed: - The resident sat in dining room with a Foley catheter (a tube inserted into the urinary bladder to drain the urine) collection bag that hung from the frame of his/her Broda chair (a wheelchair that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan consistent with the resident's specific conditions, needs, and risks within 48 hours of admission which included the minimum healthcare information necessary to provide care for one resident (Resident #52) out of five sampled residents. The facility's census was 94. Record review of the facility's Baseline Care Plan policy, dated 6/2/22, showed: - The facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident; - The care plan will be developed within 48 hours of admission; - It will include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident including, but not limited to the initial goals based on admission orders, medical provider orders, dietary orders, therapy services, and social services; - The admitting nurse, or supervising nurse on duty, shall gather information from the admission physical assessment and other information; - Once needs, goals and interventions were established, it will be documented in a designated format; - A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a care plan with specific interventions tailored to meet individual needs for two residents (Resident #9 and #55) out of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 94. Record review of the facility's Care Plan policy, dated 6/2/22, showed: - The facility will develop and implement a comprehensive person centered care plan for each resident; - The care plan will be consistent with the resident rights, professional standards of practice, medical provider orders and resident's goals and preferences; - It will include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's special medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that will be identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. 1. Record review of Resident #9's medical record showed: - An admission date 8/5/22; - Diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF) (a condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for five residents (Resident #9, #16, #17, #26 and #53) out of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 94. Record review of the facility's Oxygen Administration policy, dated 5/4/22, showed oxygen to be administered under orders of a medical provider, except in cases of emergency. 1. Record review of Resident #9's medical record showed: - admission date 8/5/22; - Diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF) (a condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe). Record review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 11/30/22, showed no physician's order for oxygen. Observations of the resident showed: - On 11/29/22 at 3:03 P.M., the resident sat in a wheel chair in his/her room with oxygen in use at 3.5 liters per minute (3.5 L/min) by nasal cannula; - On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent resident care for activities of daily living (ADL's) when the residents went an extended amount of time without showers for four residents (Resident #28, #55, #66, and #71) out of 20 sampled residents, and one resident (Resident #1) outside the sample. The facility census was 94. Record review of the facility's Resident Showers policy, revised 5/4/22, showed: - The facility will assist residents with bathing to maintain proper hygiene and help prevent skin issues; - The policy did not address how often showers to be given. Record review of the facility's Bed Baths policy, revised 11/10/22, showed: - Document the procedure. 1. Record review of Resident #1's medical record showed: - An admission date of 9/16/16; - Diagnoses of morbid obesity, major depressive disorder (MDD) (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care of standard of practice by not following the bowel regimen policy for one resident (Resident #55) out of 20 residents. The facility census was 94. Record review of the facility's Bowel Regimen policy, revised 4/5/2022, showed: - Will monitor the residents bowel movements (BM) and provide clinical best practice interventions as needed for a resident to have regular bowel movements; - Resident BM's will be evaluated and documented daily; - If a resident does not have a BM for 72 hours, the clinical team shall be alerted; - If the resident has any as needed (PRN) orders for bowel elimination assistance, it should be followed; - If the resident has no PRN order, notify the physician to obtain an order; - Monitor the resident's response to administration of bowel elimination assistance; - If no results, notify the physician; - Evaluate potential causes of constipation and implement interventions as needed to reduce causes. 1. Record review of Resident #55's medical record showed: - An admission date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to reposition two residents (Resident #13 and #26) out of two sampled residents who were identified as at risk for pressure ulcers (damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue as a result of pressure). The facility also failed to follow physician ordered wound care orders for one resident (Resident #13) out of two sampled residents. The facility census was 94. Record review of the facility's Pressure Injury (damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue as a result of pressure) Prevention and Management policy, revised on 3/3/22, showed: - The purpose will be to prevent avoidable pressure injuries and the promotion of healing existing pressure injuries; - Intervention will be based on specific factors identified in the risk assessment, skin assessment and any pressure injury assessment; - Evidence-based interventions for prevention will be implemented for all residents assessed at risk or who have a pressure injury present. Basic or routine care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion (ROM) received appropriate treatment and services to increase their ROM and/or prevent a further decrease in their range of motion. The facility staff failed to perform restorative services as recommended by the occupational therapist (OT) for one resident (Resident #36) out of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 94. Record review of the facility's Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) policy, revised, 5/4/2022, showed: - The facility will provide maintenance and restorative services to maintain or improve a resident's abilities to the highest practicable level; - Cognitive and physical functioning of all residents will be assessed in accordance with the facility's assessment protocols; - The interdisciplinary team, with the support of the physician, will assure the ongoing review, evaluation, and decision making regarding the services needed to maintain or improve resident's abilities in accordance with the resident's comprehensive assessment, goals,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide proper incontinent care for two residents (Resident #25 and #26) out of two sampled residents. The facility census was 94. Record review of the facility's Perineal Care policy, revised on 5/4/22, showed: - If the perineum should be grossly soiled, turn the resident on his/her side, remove any fecal material with toilet paper, then remove and discard. Cleanse the buttocks and anus, front to back, vagina to anus in females, scrotum to anus in males, using a separate washcloth or wipes. Thoroughly dry; - Reposition the resident in a supine (lying face up) position. Change gloves if soiled and continue with perineal care; - Remove gloves and discard, perform hand hygiene. 1. Record review of Resident #25's medical record showed: - An admission date of 9/26/15; - Diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease (progressive mental deterioration), cognitive communication defect, and urinary incontinence; - Severely cognitively impaired; - Totally dependent on staff for toileting. Observation of Resident #25 on 11/30/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders and the facility policy on getting weights on new admissions to monitor the nutritional status for two residents (Resident #54 and #55) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 94. Record review of the facility's Weight Monitoring policy, revised, 6/2/2022, showed: - Weight can be a useful indicator of nutritional status; - Significant unintended changes in weight may indicate a nutritional problem; - A weight monitoring schedule will be developed upon admission for all residents; - Weights should be recorded at the time obtained; - Newly admitted residents should have weights monitored weekly for four weeks; - If clinically indicated, weights should be monitored daily; - All other residents' weights should be monitored monthly. 1. Record review of Resident #54's medical record showed: - An admission date of 11/5/22; - Diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids), aphasia (trouble speaking or understanding other people when speaking), and memory deficit; - A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation of ongoing assessments, monitoring, and communication between the facility and the dialysis (a process for removing waste and excess water from the blood) center for two residents (Resident #17 and #66) out of two sampled residents. The facility census was 94. Record review of the facility's Hemodialysis (dialysis) policy, revised March 3, 2022, showed: - The facility will assure that each resident receives care and services for the provision of hemodialysis consistent with professional standards of practice, including an ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments received at a certified dialysis facility; - The licensed nurse will communicate with the dialysis facility via telephonic or written format, such as a dialysis communication form or other form, that will include but not limit itself to, medication administration (initiated, held or discontinued),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing data with all the required components in a clear and readable format. The facility's census was 94. Record review of the facility's Nurse Staffing Posting Information policy, dated 6/2/22, showed: - The daily staffing sheet will be posted on a daily basis and will contain the facility name, the current date, the current resident census, the total number and the actual hours worked by the licensed and unlicensed staff directly responsible for resident care per shift; - The facility will post daily and at the beginning of each shift. Observations of the nurse staffing information posted on the wall across from the nurse's station showed; - On 11/29/22 at 2:03 P.M., the posted nurse staffing information, dated 11/23/22, with no information for 11/29/22; - On 12/1/22 at 11:26 A.M., the posted nurse staffing information, dated 11/30/22, with no information for 12/1/22; - On 12/2/22 at 12:58 P.M., the posted nurse staffing information, dated 11/30/22, with no information for 12/2/22. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store medications in a safe and effective manner. The facility census was 94. Record review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, revised 4/7/22, showed: - Identify the expiration date; - If medication expired, notify the nurse manager; - Staff to observe the resident consumption of medications. 1. Observation on 12/2/22 at 8:50 A.M., of a medication pass showed: - Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) G provided Resident #44 with an inhaler while the resident sat in the the therapy room; - While the resident self-administered his/her inhaler, LPN G left the therapy room and closed the therapy room door, went to the medication cart further down the hallway, obtained a blood pressure cuff, and returned to the therapy room; - LPN G gave the resident his/her oral medication in a pill cup to hold; - LPN G left the therapy room and closed the therapy room door, went to the medication cart further down the hallway, obtained water for the resident to take his/her medications, and returned; - LPN G failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document accurate immunization status, provide information and education to each resident or the resident's representative of the influenza vaccine (a vaccine used to protect against influenza), pneumococcal vaccines (a vaccine used to protect against pneumonia bacteria) for two residents (Residents #16 and #26) out of five sampled residents. The facility's census was 94. Record review of the facility's Patient Immunization policy, revised February 2022, showed: - Influenza recommend annually for all residents; - Pneumococcal recommended for resident 65 years and older. Record review of the facility's Immunization Recommendations for Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities Immunization Manual, undated, showed: - Influenza recommended annually for all residents; - Pneumococcal PCV 13 (Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine that protects against 13 types of pneumococcal bacteria) and PPSV23 in persons 65 and older years, unless contraindicated, will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2025-04-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to promote resident independence and dignity while dining when staff served the noon meal on disposable dishware. The facility census was 86. Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights, Dignity and Visitation Rights, dated 04/01/22, showed: - It will be the policy of this facility that employees shall treat residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. The facility promotes the exercise of rights for each resident, including any who face barriers (such as communication problems, hearing problems and cognition limits) in the exercise of these rights. The facility will ensure that the resident can exercise his/her rights without interference, coercion, discrimination, or reprisal from the facility. A resident, even though determined to be incompetent, should be able to assert these rights based on his or her degree of capability; - The facility will make effort to assist each resident in exercising his/her rights to assure that the resident is always treated with respect, kindness, and dignity; providing care that is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-04-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — widespread
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an on-going program of activities designed to meet the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This practice affected five residents (Residents #13, #21, #22, #24, and #31) out of 18 sampled residents and could potentially affect all residents. The facility census was 86. Review of the facility policy titled, Activities, dated 04/01/22, showed: - It will be the policy of this facility to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an on-going program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community; - The facility shall provide an on-going person-centered activities program…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-08-23 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain written authorization from the resident and/or financial guardian for money withdrawn for two residents (Resident #6 and #7) out of a sample of 14. Additionally, the facility also failed to allow residents access to resident funds on an ongoing basis. This had the potential to affect all residents the facility managed funds for. The facility census was 86. 1. Record review of the facility maintained Resident Trust Ledger for the period 07/01/24 through 08/19/24, showed the following withdrawal from Resident #6's account: Date Amount Description 07/30/24 $50.00 Resident Advance Cash Record review on 08/19/24 of the facility maintained paperwork for Resident #6's Resident Trust Ledger, showed Resident #6's handwritten name with no written authorization by Resident #6 and/or financial guardian for the listed withdrawal. During an interview on 08/19/24 at 1:52 P.M., the Business Office Manager said the handwritten name for the withdrawal listed was not Resident #6's signature. The staff member's initials that were next…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$29,491 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $17,141 — penalty dated 2023-10-13
  • $3,176 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
  • $2,823 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
  • $6,351 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-09 for 15 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
AAR OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/01/2025
KFT HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/01/2025
KFT IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/01/2025
QHS OPERATIONS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/01/2025
GS CAPITAL FUNDING LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
BARNES, MELODYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2025
BREWER, DALEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
BREWER, HEIDIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2025
BRYANT, KAITLYNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2025
CAITO, JENEEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2025
CREEK, AMANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2025
GARNER, AMANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2025
HOSEA, CHRISTENAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2025
LAZAR, LEVIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2025
MOORE, ANGELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/17/2025
RAINEY, JONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2025
WILSON, CHRISTOPHERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2025
NEUBERGER, ISAACIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
REVACH LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$349K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 3%Other / private 26%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $349K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$277per resident / day
operating cost
$8,423per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$264per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265430. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next