No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bluffs, The

3105 Bluff Creek Drive, Columbia, MO 65201 · Non profit - Corporation · 132 certified beds · (573) 442-6060 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Jan 20261 immediate-jeopardy citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$37,621 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $37,621 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-14)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2900 Falling Leaf Ln · (573) 442-0940 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2909 Falling Leaf Ln · (573) 545-5278 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ALDI1.2 mi
 
Park
(573) 874-7465 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.2%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%5.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.5%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.7%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.2%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.8%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.3%25.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine58.4%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.0%17.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.3%23.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine30.0%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.4%26.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit23.2%13.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.062.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.352.331.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 133 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
35.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 35.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.6%CMS range 46.2–62.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 8.1–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge35.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified55.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting72.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge71.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.9%CMS range 5.7–13.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.59
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.02
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.20
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.46
RN hoursweekends
61.8%
Total nursing turnover
56.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 118.1 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.02 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.34 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-30)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-01)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to follow standard universal infection control precautions when staff used one insulin pen on three residents (Resident #7, #10, and #41), possibly creating a risk of bloodborne and bacterial pathogen transmission. The facility failed to use appropriate hand hygiene infection control practices during perineal and wound care for four (# 41, #43, #47, #105) of four sampled residents, and failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), the wearing of gown and gloves during high contact patient care activities to prevent the spread of multi-resistant organisms, for three (#7, #19, and #105) of four sampled residents. The facility census was 117. The administrator was notified on 10/31/24 at 8:00 A.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 10/28/24. The IJ was removed on 10/30/24, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. 1. Review of the facility's policy showed staff did not provide an Insulin Administration policy. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-02-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure residents remained free of significant medication errors when staff administered Resident #2's medication to Resident #1 which resulted in Resident #1 being transported to the hospital with low blood sugar. The facility census was 116. The administrator was notified on [DATE] of past Non-Compliance, which occurred on [DATE] when staff administered the wrong medication to the incorrect resident. Staff assessed the resident, notified the residents physician, sent the resident to the hospital, and in-serviced nursing staff on medication administration. Staff corrected the deficient practice on [DATE]. 1. Review of the facility Medication Administration policy, dated [DATE], showed nursing personnel shall ensure the safe and effective administration of medications. A physician or authorized practitioner should give all orders for medications or treatments that include medications. Prior to administration the nursing staff member administering the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide a proper mechanical lift transfer for one resident (Resident #1) in a manner to prevent accidents when staff failed to lower the resident appropriately in the shower chair which resulted in a compression fracture (a break in a vertebra, or bone in your spine, causes it to collapse) the resident's spine. The facility census was 115. 1. Review of the facility's use of lift machine policy, dated 11/25/2019, showed the purpose of the policy is to help lift residents who otherwise may not be transferred manually, promote comfort and maintain good body alignment while resident is being moved, to position the resident in desired location, and use controls to slowly lower resident to that location. 2. Review of Resident #1's five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 7/1/24, showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -Cognitively intact; -Required substantial maximal assistance for toileting, showers, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — widespread
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain professional standards of practice when staff failed to ensure wound care orders were in place for one resident (Resident #123), failed to follow wound care orders for one resident (Resident #7), failed to follow orders for wrist splints to prevent or maintain contractures for one resident (Resident #19), and failed to complete neurological assessments after falls for two residents (Resident #103 and #63), out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 115.1. Review showed the facility failed to provide a policy that directs staff in regard to physician's orders.2. Review of Resident #123's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 01/12/26, showed staff assessed the resident as:-Cognitively Impaired;-Substantial/Maximal assistance with shower/bathing, upper and lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear, and personal hygiene;-One or more unhealed pressure ulcers (damage to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to serve food in accordance with the nutritionally calculated menus to all residents. The facility census was 115.1. Review of the facility lunch menus, dated 01/28/26 (Week 1, Day 4), showed the menus directed staff to provide the residents who receive pureed diets with a: -#8 (four ounces (oz.)) scoop of pureed barbequed pork;-#8 scoop of mashed potatoes with thick gravy;-#10 (3.2 oz.) scoop of pureed spinach;-#16 (two oz.) scoop of pureed dinner roll with margarine. Observation on 01/28/26 during the lunch meal service which began at 11:24 A.M., showed staff served the residents who received pureed diets with #10 scoops of pureed barbequed pork and mashed potatoes and a #12 (2.6 oz.) scoop of pureed spinach (less than directed by the menus). Observation also showed staff did not prepare, serve or offer the pureed dinner roll with margarine as directed by the menus. Review of the facility lunch menus dated, 01/29/26 (Week 1, Day 5), showed the menus directed staff to provide the residents who receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to preform hand hygiene as often as necessary using approved techniques to prevent cross-contamination. Facility staff also failed to allow sanitized dishes to air dry prior to stacking in storage and use to prevent the growth of foodborne pathogens. These failures have the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 115.1. Review of the facility's Hand Hygiene & Glove Changes policy, dated 06/01/24, showed All staff members shall practice hand hygiene and glove changes in accordance with these procedures and applicable standards of practice to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination. Review showed the policy directed staff to apply soap and, using friction, rub hands together for at least 30 seconds when they washed their hands and to wash their hands, at a minimum, when: -When coming on duty;-When hands are visibly soiled;-Before putting on gloves;-In between glove changes;-After taking gloves off;-Before and after eating or handling food;-Before and after assisting a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, when staff failed to develop and review the program, policies and procedures annually. Facility staff failed to use enhanced barrier precautions ((EBP) - infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms), and/or failed to have EBP signs posted, perform appropriate hand hygiene and glove changes during wound care for three residents (Resident #7, #103, and #123) out of three sampled residents, catheter care for one resident (Resident #8) of two sampled residents. Facility staff failed to ensure sanitary conditions for catheter tubing when they failed to keep the tubing off the floor for one resident (Resident #7) out of two sampled residents. Facility staff failed to ensure the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program with antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor and track antibiotic use within the facility. The facility census was 115.1.Review of the facility's policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship Program, revised 10/30/18, showed the objective: to promote the highest possible quality of care by optimizing the treatment of infections while reducing unnecessary laboratory tests and antibiotic use through promotion of antibiotic stewardship principles and development of activities aimed at improving jhow antibiotics are used and prescribed. Review showed:-Policy: Antibiotic Stewardship is a set of commitments and actions intended to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing adverse events associated with antibiotic use. This policy establishes an Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) as part of the infection prevention and control program (IPCP) with key directives to improve the responsible and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0887 — widespread
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered COVID-19 (an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV 2 virus) vaccination, that education was provided regarding the benefits and risks of the COVID-19 vaccine and signed consent, or refusal obtained from the resident or the resident's representative, for four residents (Residents #7, #19, #21, and #28) out of five sampled residents and for three staff members (Director of Food Services, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) B and Resident Service Assistant (RSA) C) of three sampled staff members. The facility census was 115.1.Review of the facility's policy titled, Covid 19 Vaccine Policy, revised 05/30/23, showed Covid-19 vaccine will be ordered from either our long-term care pharmacy or local or state public health agency or arrangements will be made with a vaccine provider to administer the vaccine to the staff or residents. In case of lack of availability of the covid-19 vaccine, or other issue with the availability leading to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain resident dignity, when staff stood over four residents (Residents #58, #78, #34 and #19) of 27 sampled residents as they fed them during mealtime. The facility census was 115.1.Review of the facility's Nursing Home Residents' Rights policy, undated, showed residents have a right to a dignified existence; to be treated with consideration, resident, and dignity, recognizing each resident's individuality; quality of life maintained or improved; and a homelike environment. Review of the facility's policies showed staff did not provide policy for staff assisting residents at mealtime. 2. Review of Resident #58's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:-Severe cognitive impairment;-Range of Motion (ROM) impairment to one side of upper extremities;-Set up assistance from staff members with eating. Observation on 01/27/26 at12:25 P.M., showed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) R stood over the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to document residents' code status (Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) or Full Code (Resuscitate refers to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)) consistently for two residents (Resident #2, and #100). The facility census was 115.1. Review of the facility's policies showed did not contain a policy for advance directives or resident code status. 2. Review of Resident #2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Face Sheet, showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a code status as DNR. Review of the resident's Physician Order sheet (POS), dated 12/2025, showed the physician signed an order for Full Code status. Review of the resident's Care Plan, dated 12/2025, showed staff documented the resident as DNR status. Observation of the resident's door showed a red dot by the resident's name indicated a code status of DNR. Review of the facility's code status binder did not contain the residents code status for staff to use when resident's leave the building. 3.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to notify the physician or registered dietician of the refusal of nutritional supplements for one resident (Resident #44), and failed to obtain a nutritional supplement in a timely manner for one resident (#61), out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 115.1. Review of the facility's policies did not contain a policy to direct staff on when to notify the physician or dietician if a resident refuses prescribed supplements or a policy on when to obtain a physician's order for supplements.2. Review of Resident #44's quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 12/10/25, showed staff assessed the resident with impaired cognition, and weight loss of five percent or more in the last month or loss of 10 percent or more in the last six months.Review of the resident's care plan, dated 03/23/25, showed the resident has experienced weight loss, has a med pass 2.0 nutritional supplement (shake) ordered three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to screen five employees (Director of Food Services, Resident Service Assistant (RSA) D, RSA C, Dietary Aide (DA) CC and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) FF) out of ten new employees prior to employment to determine if the employees had any indicators on the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Registry. The facility census was 115. 1. Review of the Facility's policy titled, Abuse & Neglect, dated 05/31/24, showed the facility will not employ individuals who have had a finding entered the Missouri CNA Registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of their property. The facility will report to the state nurse aide registry or any other licensing authorities any knowledge it has of actions by a court of law against an employee, which would indicate unfitness for service as a nurse aide or other facility staff. 2. Review of the Director of Food Services' personnel record showed: -Hire date of 01/06/25;-Did not contain documentation a CNA Registry check was completed. 3. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to review and revise the plan of care with changes in the residents' needs for six residents (Resident #7, #8, #19, #61, #78 and #103) out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 115.1. Review showed the facility failed to provide a policy that directs staff when to review or revise care plans. 2. Review of Resident #7's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 01/12/26, showed staff assessed the resident as:-Moderate cognitive impairment;-One or more unhealed pressure ulcers;-Two unstageable pressure ulcers. Review of the resident's progress notes, dated 12/02/25, showed staff documented the resident seen by wound clinic for two unstageable pressure ulcers to bilateral heals.Review of the resident's care plan, revised 1/20/26, showed it did not contain documentation in regard to the resident's bilateral heal unstageable pressure ulcers.During an interview on 01/30/26 at 12:18 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure medications were stored in a safe and effective manner when staff failed to discard expired medications/supplies for two out of five medication carts, and one of three medication storage rooms. The facility census was 115.1. Review of the facility's Storage and Labeling of Drugs Policy, dated 12/02/13, showed nursing staff shall check all stock medications routinely (no less than monthly) for expired medications the need for restocking and that the stock be rotated. Central supply staff or Director of Nursing (DON) Designee is responsible for checking expiration dates of all stock medication at least monthly. As new stock medications are brought in, stock is rotated to ensure oldestsamples are at the front. Expired medications are to be destroyed through use of drug buster. When a multi-dose medication vial is opened, the date opened is written on the vial or box. The vial is disposed within 30 days after it is opened. 2. Observation on 01/27/26 at 2:02 P.M., showed the Cherry hall medication cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure the residents' environment remained free of accident hazards when staff failed to properly store medications in the memory care unit bathroom and left medications in one resident's bathroom (Resident #62). The facility census was 115.1.Review showed the facility failed to provide a policy to direct staff on medication storage safety. 2. Observation on 01/29/26 at 8:35 A.M., showed the whirlpool bathroom on the memory care unit unlocked, with the door propped open, and the following sitting out:-Nystatin (Antifungal) topical 100,000 unit/gram powder labeled with a resident's name;-Triad hydrophilic wound dressing pansement hydrophilic (a sterile, zinc-oxide based paste designed to manage light-to-moderate wound exudate by creating a moist, healing environment);-Calmoseptine ointment (a multipurpose, over-the-counter moisture barrier designed to treat skin irritations, diaper rash, incontinence, and minor wounds);-A&D ointment.3.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to provide a clean, homelike and comfortable environment when staff failed to maintain resident rooms in clean and good repair. The facility census was 117. 1. Review of the facility's Work Order Policy, dated 01/10/24, showed when staff noticed maintenance or repair needs, they should report this to their immediate supervisor, the charge nurse, or a member of the leadership team. 2. Observation on 10/28/24 at 11:40 A.M., showed resident occupied room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom floor with a ripped area at the shower stall. Stained floor trim that was pulled away from the wall by the shower.i Observation on 10/28/24 at 2:31 P.M., showed resident occupied room [ROOM NUMBER]'s wall behind the bed with multiple areas of gouged and chipped paint. Observation on 10/29/24 at 10:20 A.M., showed resident occupied room [ROOM NUMBER]'s wall with scuff marks next to the bed and behind the recliner. Observation on 10/29/24 at 10:25 A.M., showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide written notice to residents or the resident's representatives regarding resident transfers to the hospital for four of four sampled residents (Resident #19, #48, #69, and #115). The facility census was 117. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed staff did not provide a policy for transfers to the hospital. 2. Review of Resident #19's medical record showed the following: -Transferred to the hospital on [DATE]; -Returned to the facility on [DATE]; -Transferred to the hospital on [DATE]; -Returned to the facility on [DATE]; -Staff did not document they notified the resident or resident representative of the transfer in writing. 3. Review of Resident #48's medical record showed the following: -Transferred to Emergency Department on 10/9/24 with return anticipated; -Staff did not document they notified the resident or resident representative of the transfer in writing. 4. Review of Resident #69's medical record showed the following:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident's representative of their bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for two (Resident #19 and #69) of three sampled residents. The facility census was 117. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed staff did not provide a policy for transfers to the hospital. 2. Review of Resident #19's medical record showed staff documented the resident: -Transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]; -Transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]; -Staff did not document they notified the resident or the resident representative of the bed hold policy in writing. 3. Review of Resident #69's medical record showed staff documented the resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Staff did not document they notified the resident or the resident representative of the bed hold policy in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to develop comprehensive care plans with resident-specific interventions to meet the resident's preferences and goals, and to address the resident's medical, physical, and psychosocial needs for five residents (Residents #45, #49, #56, #108, and #111) out of twelve sampled residents. The census was 117. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed the facility did not provide a policy for care plans. 2. Review of Resident #45's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 07/16/24, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Cognitively impaired; -Had inattentive and disorganized thinking that fluctuated; -No behaviors or wandering; -Diagnosis of dementia. Review of the resident's nurse notes, dated 08/28/24 through 10/28/24 showed staff documented: -On 08/28/24 at 2:38 P.M., intermittent behaviors; -On 09/16/24 at 12:41 P.M., resident began to get angry and yell at staff while taking resident to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, staff failed to document neurological checks after a fall for one (Resident #119) per facility policy, failed to document the removal of medication patches and the location of the new patch for one resident (Resident #48) who received Exelon Patches (to treat Alzheimer's disease) per facility policy and failed to document an indication for use on medications for seven (Resident #31, #45, #72, #87, #99, #111, and #324) of seven sampled residents. The facility census was 117. 1. Review of the facility's fall policy, dated October 2021, showed a fall is defined as an unintended change in position coming to rest on the ground or onto the succeeding lower surface and can occur while walking, standing, lying in bed and sitting. When a resident falls or is found on the floor, the licensed nurse will complete the appropriate fall documentation to include, fall observation and neurological checks on all residents who experienced unwitnessed falls or witnessed falls in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to transfer two residents (Residents #26 and #81) of three sampled residents by mechanical lift in a manner to prevent accidents. Facility staff failed to safely propel two residents (Resident #50 and #24) in a wheelchair and failed to properly secure medication in two treatment carts on the secured unit and the 500 hall. The facility census was 117. 1. Review of the facility's Use of Lift Machine policy, dated 12/06/19, showed: -Portable lift should be used by two nursing assistants to perform procedure; -Assist resident in guiding his/her legs; -Always keep the resident centered over the base and facing the caregiver operating the lift; -The policy did not contain direction for position of the base legs during the transfer. Review of Resident #26's 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 09/29/24, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Cognitively impaired; -Used a mechanical lift; -Impaired movement on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to properly maintain the temperature of hot food at or above 120 Degrees Fahrenheit (°F) for four residents (Resident #6, #49, #68, and #69) at the time of meal service and failed to implement a system to monitor food temperatures at the time of service. Failure to maintain foods at the proper temperature has the potential to affect all residents who received room trays. The facility census was 117. Review of the facility's policy Nutrition, dated 9/10/23, showed the facility strives to enhance the health and quality of likes of all residents through nutritious and appetizing meals. 1. Observation on 10/31/24 at 8:44 A.M., showed facility staff delivered a hall tray to Resident #6's room. The scrambled eggs were 82 °F and the oatmeal was 92 °F when checked with a calibrated stem-type thermometer by Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) staff. During an interview on 10/31/24 at 8:46 A.M., Resident #6 said the food is often cold, and especially breakfast. He/She said, I don't enjoy my food as much when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to notify one resident (Resident #119) of one sampled resident's physician and representative in a timely manner when the resident had a fall with major injury. The facility census was 117. 1. Review of the facility's Notification of Family Members, Physician and Residents policy, dated 09/05/08, showed: -The purpose is to maintain communication and ensure that family members, physicians and residents are provided the opportunity to participate in the planning of medical care; -The resident's responsible party must be notified when there is a significant change of condition to include falls and injury; -The resident's physician and the facility administrator must be notified for significant changes of condition to include falls and injury; -The nurse on duty at the time the significant change occurs is responsible for making every attempt to contact the resident's family as soon as possible as well as the residents' physician if indicated and document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to follow their Abuse & Neglect policy to investigate an allegation of misappropriation of property and failed to contact the local law enforcement within the required timeframe for one resident (Resident #1) out of one sampled residents. The facility census was 122. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect, revised 05/10/19, showed staff are directed to do the following: -All allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property will be thoroughly investigated. The facility will prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while the investigation is in progress; -All Alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment of residents, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, shall be reported immediately to the administrator and the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS), twenty four hours from the time the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, facility failed to report a missing electronic device for one resident (Resident #1) out of one sampled residents to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within the required timeframe. This has the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 122. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect, revised 05/10/19, showed staff are directed: -All Alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment of residents, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, shall be reported immediately to the Administrator and the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS), but not later than two hours from the time the allegation is made if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury or twenty four hours from the time the allegation is made if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene in a manner to prevent the spread of infection and failed to clean and sanitize soiled utensils between uses to prevent cross-contamination. Facility staff failed to maintain the kitchen floors and appliances in a clean manner to prevent the growth and harborage of bacteria. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 112. 1. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy for hand hygiene or glove changes. 2. Review of the facility's posting, Stop Germs! Wash You Hands, undated showed staff were directed to keep hands clean is one of the most important things we can do to stop the spread of germs and stay healthy. Observation on 04/25/24 at 12:00 P.M., showed dietary server C removed his/her gloves, applied clean gloves and did not wash his/her hands between glove changes. With the same gloves on, he/she touched a resident's sandwich, used a thermometer to test the food temperatures, and plated the lunch trays. During an interview on 04/25/24 at 1:13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to complete a thourough investigation when staff reported one resident (Resident #5's) jar of quarters missing from his/her room. Staff did not interview additional residents, witnesses and family members. The facility census was 113. 1. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, revised 5/10/19, showed the policy designed to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment of residents, and misappropriation of resident property and to ensure appropriate intervention, investigation, and timely reporting in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment of residents, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property, staff were directed as follows: -Investigation and Protection: All allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment of residents, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property will be thoroughly investigated. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards when staff failed to secure medications and sharps on unattended medication carts. The facility census was 117. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration, dated 9/09/23, showed staff must secure medications at all times. When not in use, medication cart drawers should be locked. Medications shall not be left unattended on counters or work stations. 2. Observation on 12/06/23 at 10:26 A.M., showed an unattended medication cart. The medication cart had a bottle of Escitalopram (antidepressant medication) 10 milligrams (mg) which contained 1 tablet, a bottle of Pantoprozale (used to reduce stomach acid) 40 mg which contained 3 tablets and a bubble pack of Omeprazole (used to reduce stomach acid) 20 mg which contained seven tablets on top of the cart. The medication cart sat unattended until 11:25 A.M., when Certified Medication Technician returned.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the potential spread of COVID-19 (an acute respiratory illness in humans caused by the coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2) and other infections, when staff failed to follow acceptable infection control practices for COVID-19. Facility staff failed to wear an N95 (respirator) mask during the provision of care for two COVID-19 positive residents (Resident #3, and #4).The facility census was 117. 1. Review of the facility's policy, Guideline For Isolation Precautions, dated 9/28/21, showed the policy did not instruct what type of mask staff should use for suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections. Review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, updated 05/8/23, showed Health Care Providers (HCP) who enter the room of a patient with suspected or confirmed SARS-Co V-2 infection should adhere to Standard Precautions and use a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, facility staff failed to provide a clean, safe, and comfortable homelike environment when staff failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #2) bed was in good repair. The facility census was 117. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Faulty Equipment, undated , showed staff shall alert their supervisor of faulty equipment. Supervisors should send an email to the Maintenance Department to report the issue. 2. Review of Resident #2's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 09/30/23, showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers; -Diagnosis of dementia (progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change, resulting from organic disease of the brain), Anxiety Disorder, Schizophrenia (mental condition involving a breakdown in relation between thought, emotion and behaviors), Post-Traumatic Stress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, facility staff failed to report an allegation of employee to resident verbal abuse for one resident (Resident #1) to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within the two hour required time frame. The facility census was 118. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect, revised May 2019, showed allegations of abuse, mistreatment, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property will be appropriately investigated and timely reported per federal and state laws. Review showed all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment of residents, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, shall be reported immediately to the Administrator and the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, but not later than two hours from the time the allegation is made if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or 24 hours from the time the allegation is made if the events that cause the allegation do not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to assist two residents (Resident #3 and #4) with their meals. The facility census was 117. 1. Review of the facility's policy, Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Services, dated 10/01/21, showed staff shall provide residents assistance with ADL's every shift, as appropriate. ADL's include bathing, grooming, dressing, eating, oral hygiene, ambulation and toilet activities. Review of the facility's Menu Board located on Walnut Grove Hall, showed lunch will be served between 12:20 P.M., and 12:30 P.M. 2. Review of Resident #3's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 11/15/23, showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Supervision from staff member with eating; -Dependent on staff members for personal hygiene, dressing, bed mobility and sitting up in bed; -Diagnoses of Dementia (progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to maintain prepared foods at the proper temperature before service, failed to perform hand hygiene as often as necessary using approved techniques to prevent cross-contamination. Facility staff also failed to use the sanitizing solution according to facility policy and manufacturer's instructions and to allow clean and sanitized kitchenware to dry prior to use to prevent the growth of food-borne pathogens. Facility staff also failed to replace a missing ceiling tile in the food preparation area. The facility census was 111. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Temperatures policy, undated, showed hot foods on the tray line should be above 140 degrees F. If less than that, should be returned for reheating. The policy did not contain guidance specific to microwave reheating of meals. Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Control - Nutritional Service, undated, showed: -Steam tables shall maintain hot foods at temperatures of 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or above; -All personnel shall observe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet the resident's medical and nursing needs when staff failed to include in the plans oxygen use for two residents (Resident #3 and #55), Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), a non-invasive ventilation machine that involves the administration of air usually through the nose by an external device at a predetermined level of pressure) use for two residents (Resident #48 and #417), and activity preferences for one resident (Resident #107). The facility census was 111. 1. Review of the policies provided by the facility showed no policy for Care Plans. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual Version 3.0, dated October 2019, showed staff are directed to: -Regulations require facilities to complete, at a minimum and at regular intervals, a comprehensive, standardized assessment of each resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review facility staff failed to assist four out of six sampled dependent residents (Resident #39, #67, #80 and #93) with grooming and bathing as needed. The facility census was 111. Review of the policies provided by the facility showed no policy for the care of dependent residents. 1. Review of Resident #39's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 5/1/23, showed facility staff assessed the resident as: -Severe Cognitive impairment; -Totally dependent on one staff member for transfers; -Required extensive assistance from two or more staff members for dressing; -Totally dependent on one staff member for bathing. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 1/25/23, showed staff were directed to assist the resident to the extent needed to remain dry, clean, and well groomed. Review of the resident's Point of Care shower report, dated 4/1/23 through 6/28/23, showed the resident received a shower on 4/1/23, 4/26/23, 6/11/23, 6/13/23, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to transfer three residents (Residents #46, #29 and #39) by sling-type mechanical lift and one resident (Resident #78) by Sit to Stand mechanical lift), in a manner to prevent accidents. Additionally, staff failed to properly secure one medication cart. The facility census was 111. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Use of Lift Machine, dated 12/6/19, showed staff are directed to do the following: -Portable lift should be used by two staff members to perform procedure; -Make sure the lift is stable, legs fully extended, and locked. The lifter's base must be spread to the widest position and the brakes activated and locked. 2. Review of the Resident #46's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, 05/02/23, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (cognitively intact); -Totally dependent on two staff members for transfers; -Diagnoses of Depression and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review facility staff failed to store and label medications in safe and effective manner in two of three medication storage rooms, and two of three medication storage carts. The facility census was 111. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Storage/Labeling of Drugs, dated 12/2/2013, showed staff are directed to do the following: -All medications will be checked at least monthly for expiration dates; -Expired medications are to be destroyed through the use of drug buster. 2. Observation on 06/27/23 at 2:34 P.M., showed the Walnut hall medication storage room contained one box of Albulterol Sulfate 0.63 mg with an expiration date of May 2023. Observation on 06/27/23 at 3:00 P.M., showed the Cherry hall medication storage room contained one dressing change kit with an expiration date of May 2023. Observation on 06/27/23 at 3:15 P.M., showed the Walnut hall medication cart contained two loose white capsules, and two loose white oval tablets. Observation on 06/27/23 at 4:00 P.M., showed the Oak hall medication cart contained one loose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment when staff failed to use hand hygiene during incontinence care for one resident (Resident #46) and wound care for one resident (Resident #42). Additionally, staff failed to decrease the risk of infection for four residents (Resident #55, #30, #3, and #79) when staff failed to ensure sanitary conditions for oxygen tubing, and failed to sanitize or clean a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), (a machine that used mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open while you sleep), machine and tubing for one resident (Resident #48). The facility census was 111. 1. Review of the facility's policy, Hand Hygiene, revised 10/30/2018, showed staff were directed to do the following: -When to wash hands (at a minimum): -When hands are visibly soiled (hand washing with soap and water); -Before and after direct resident contact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to notify one resident's (Resident #64) physician when staff identified the resident with Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD) and failed to obtain treatment orders. The facility census was 111. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Skin Care Protocol, dated 07/01/2011, showed staff are directed to do the following: -To ensure prompt and appropriate treatment for skin conditions identified by clinical staff, the following protocol may be initiated and the physician notified; -Initiate skin protocol; -Notify the physician of house protocol and obtain orders; -Update care plan, Treatment Administration Record (TAR), Physician Order Sheet (POS) with any new interventions for skin breakdown. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 05/18/2023, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Cognitively Intact; -Required extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility, transfers and toilet use; -Frequently incontinent of urine; -Occasional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to obtain a physician's order for the use of an indwelling catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) for one resident (Resident #3), and failed to document when they discontinued or changed the catheter. Facility census was 111. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Catheter Care, revised October, 2018, showed staff were directed to document in the clinical notes the replacement of or any changes in apparatus, size of catheter, size of balloon, amount of fluid in the balloon when inflated and the date/time. Review of the facility's policy titled, Physician Visits and Medical Orders, undated, showed staff were directed to do the following: -Medical orders reflect changes in diagnosis, care, treatment, services, medical equipment needed and the resident's response to ordered care, services or treatment; -Members of the interdisciplinary team provide care, services and treatment according to the most recent medical orders and according to laws, regulations and standards of practice.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$37,621 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-01-14
  • $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-01-14
  • $19,401 — penalty dated 2024-11-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GERSHMAN INVESTMENT CORP.Organization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 10/24/2011
DRESNER, JESSICAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/30/2025
MOORE, CHRISTINAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2019
MOSS, JANETIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/31/2023
PROST, EVANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/30/2024
SIMPSON, DORISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/30/2024
VELLOFF-BURRIS, TARAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/31/2023
BACON, SUZETTEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/30/2023
BAKER, JENNIFERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/30/2025
FAIRCHILD, JULIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/09/2021
GILBERT, BARRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/31/2022
MINNER, DONNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/28/2023
SJOBLOM, BETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2021
KPM CPAS, PCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2023
MIDWEST PHYSICAL THERAPY PCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
HARRINGTON, RANSHELLIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/26/2024
PRENTICE-KUHN, AMYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 49%Medicare 6%Other / private 45%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$285per resident / day
operating cost
$8,668per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$302per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265498. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next