Ellisville Rehabilitation And Nursing
322 Old State Road, Ellisville, MO 63021 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 210 certified beds · (636) 227-3431 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0604) — most recent Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
- inspectors cited 9 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (65) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $260,092 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-16)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.4% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.3% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.8% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 8.4% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.8% | 17.4% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.2% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.5% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.0% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.3% | 17.8% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 27.0% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 2.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 41.5% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.0% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.9% | 13.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.28 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.08 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 229 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 37.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.5%CMS range 32.3–44.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.2%CMS range 10.3–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 37.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 30.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 29.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 89.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 87.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 90.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.2–10.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.89 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 210 beds and averages 120.4 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 90 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.10 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%. 4 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
65 citations, most serious first. The 22 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately respond to one resident's (Resident #35) change of condition and/or conduct and document a thorough assessment and contact the resident's physician. The resident began vomiting on 02/25/26, continued to vomit through 03/01/26 when staff called 911 to send him/her to the hospital. Staff documented the nurse practitioner (NP) assessed the resident on 2/26/26. The order for ondansetron (Zofran, anti-nausea medication) was sent on 2/27/26. Staff administered the medication on 2/27/26 at 1:53 P.M. The resident continued to vomit after the administration of the medication. On 2/28/26, staff said the vomit started to darken in color. Staff did not document notification to the physician when the vomiting continued or darkened in color until 3/1/26. On 3/1/26, the nurse notified the physician's office after the resident vomited three times during the day with the last time being a copious amount of black emesis (vomit). Staff called 911 to send…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-19 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide basic life support including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, a lifesaving technique that's used in emergencies in which someone's breathing and/or heartbeat has stopped) after Resident #1 had a rapid change in condition and coded. Registered Nurse (RN) F began CPR when he/she was unable to locate the resident's code status (initiate CPR or do not initiate CPR). RN F did not call for additional staff assistance over the facility intercom system, did not provide rescue breaths during CPR, and did not use the automated external defibrillator (AED, a portable device that can be used to treat a person whose heart has suddenly stopped working) located at the nurse's station. RN F did not continue CPR until emergency medical services (EMS) arrived at the resident's bedside. This had the potential to affect 19 of 24 residents residing on the 200 hall with an order to initiate CPR. The sample size was 3. The census was 135. The Administrator was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to appropriately respond to a resident's (Resident #1's) change of condition, failed to conduct a thorough, documented assessment, and failed to contact the resident's physician, regarding the resident's change of condition, which began on 2/20/25. Staff failed to assess the resident who was not eating, stared blankly and could not keep his/her head up. The resident became unresponsive and was sent to the hospital with diagnoses of pneumonia (a lung infection, often caused by bacteria, viruses, or fungi, that inflames the air sacs (alveoli) and can lead to fluid or pus buildup, causing symptoms like cough, fever, and difficulty breathing), respiratory failure, and sepsis (a life-threatening condition that occurs when the body's immune system overreacts to an infection, leading to widespread inflammation and organ damage). The sample was four. The facility census was 140. The Administrator was notified on 2/27/25 at 3:30 P.M., of an immediate jeopardy (IJ) which began on 2/20/25. The IJ was removed on 2/28/25 as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to appropriately respond to a resident's (Resident #351) change of condition, failed to conduct a thorough, documented assessment, and failed to contact the resident's physician, regarding the resident's change of condition, which began on [DATE]. The resident expired in the facility on [DATE]. The sample was 23. The facility census was 134. The Administrator was notified on [DATE] at 11:45 A.M., of an immediate jeopardy (IJ) which began on [DATE]. The IJ was removed on [DATE] as confirmed by surveyor on-site verification. Review of the facility's, undated Change of Condition Notification Policy and Procedure, showed: -Definitions: Significant change in the resident's condition: Is any physical, mental or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications); -Policy: The facility will promptly notify the resident, his or her physician/practitioner and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management for Resident #524, who complained of pain when staff provided care upon waking, again when assessed by therapy at breakfast and also when put to bed after dinner. The resident was administered no pain medication for 19 hours until he/she was transferred to the hospital after an x-ray showed the resident had a fractured hip. The facility staff also failed to provide as needed (PRN) pain medication to Resident #516 who suffered from chronic pain for four hours. The facility also failed to ensure Resident #507's Lidocaine patch (a topical pain reliever) was ordered timely and administered as ordered. In addition, the facility failed to ensure timely referral to pain management and failed to implement alternative interventions after discontinuing the resident's Norco (an opioid pain reliever), placing the resident at higher risk for unnecessary pain and discomfort. The sample size was 30. The facility census was 114.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-05-16 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary physical restraints when staff held one resident's wrist down while providing personal care (Resident #503). The staff did not follow facility policy or the resident's care plan when the resident was resistive to care. After the resident refused care, the staff continued to provide care while holding the resident down, instead of allowing the resident to calm down and self-soothe, as the care plan instructed. During the forced care, the resident's behaviors remained escalated when he/she swung, kicked, and bit the staff. A skin assessment on the day of the incident showed a skin tear to the resident's chin and bruising on both hands. The sample was 23. The census was 111. The Administrator was notified on 5/16/25 at 3:30 P.M., of the past non-compliance, which began on 5/12/25. The facility immediately removed the Registered Nurse (RN) from the floor. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) assumed responsibility of the nurse's assignment. The Certified Nurse Aide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and document findings for 72 hours, in accordance with the facility's policy after one sampled resident experienced an unwitnessed fall (Resident #99). In addition, the facility failed to update the resident's care plan. The sample size was 23. The census was 115. Review of the facility's Fall Protocols Policy, dated 10/22/23, showed: -Policy: The nursing staff, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary team will seek to identify and document resident risk factors for falls and establish a resident-centered falls prevention plan based on relevant assessment information. The facility will maintain the environment in a manner to promote safety; -Actual Fall: If a resident experiences a fall, the resident will be assessed for potential injury and a change in condition; -The incident will be documented in the resident's medical record; -The resident will be monitored for change in condition every shift for 72 hours, unless otherwise ordered by the physician. Review of Resident #99's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met acceptable professional standards of care when staff failed to administer and document morning and afternoon medications as order by the physician for seven residents (Resident #8, Resident #7, Resident #11, Resident #9, Resident #12, Resident #2 and Resident #6 and Resident #10). Additionally, the facility failed to refill Hydrocodone (prescription opioid used for moderate to severe pain) 5-325 milligrams (mg) for one resident (Resident #4) who had severe pain in a timely manner. The resident did not receive his/her hydrocodone for two days. The sample was 18. The census was 109.Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, dated October 2024, showed:-Medications were administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who were legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection;-Ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 43 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain food at a palatable, safe, and appetizing temperature during meal service. This deficiency affected five of 11 sampled residents (Residents #19, #24, #25, #28, and #21). The census was 126. Review of the facility's On Tray Dietary Policies and Procedures, not dated, showed:-Food temperatures are maintained during serving times;-Food and beverage temperatures should be taken and logged upon being cooked and again prior to meal service;-Food temperatures should be within the required temperatures per state and federal guidelines when cooked and served. If foods are not in the correct temperature zone, corrections should be made or food is discarded;-Poultry is cooked to a minimum of 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F);-Eggs should be cooked to 145 degrees F,-Hot foods are served at 135 degrees F or higher and cold foods/beverages are served at 41degrees F or lower;-Log cook and service (holding) temperatures;-Logs should be on file for one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with alternate food choices and preferences listed on the Always Available menu (Residents #4 and #25). In addition, the facility failed to serve foods listed on meal tickets for three of 11 sampled residents (Resident #22, #19, and #24). The census was 126. Review of the dietary Always Available menu on 03/02/16, showed items included hamburger/cheeseburger, grilled cheese, cold cut sandwiches, chef or garden salad, cold cereal, hot dogs, and peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. 1. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 11/30/25, showed: -admitted on [DATE];-Cognitively intact. During an interview on 03/04/26 at 9:00 A.M., the resident said the facility had an Always Available menu, but when residents ask a staff member for an alternative, they are always told the kitchen is too busy to send it up, they are out of the alternative, or the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents right to personal privacy and confidentiality when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A provided peri-care (incontinence care) to a resident (Resident #1) during a video call with CNA B and Scheduler H. CNA B was at home and two children were on camera with him/her. The resident's genitals and buttocks were exposed. Additionally, CNA B took pictures of a resident (Resident #2) while he/she slept and shared it to a group chat with staff and non-staff members. The sample was 18. The census was 109.Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, dated September 2024, showed:-The resident had the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility;-The resident had a right to be treated with respect and dignity-The resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike; environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely. Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly document and investigate a physical relationship between two cognitively impaired residents (Resident #33 and #39) after it was reported staff observed them together in one of their rooms, with one of the residents partially unclothed. The facility also failed to follow their policy, notify the residents' physician and immediately update the care plan with interventions to protect the residents and their rights. The sample was 15. The census was 130. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy, dated 2022, showed:-Policy: It is the policy of the facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property; --Sexual abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident;-Policy explanation and compliance guidelines:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough and immediate investigation of an injury of unknown source after a facility Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) discovered a resident (Resident #20), with a bruise on his/her neck fold and under his/her left eye. The resident said he/she remembered staff helping him/her off the floor. He/She did not remember falling. The sample was 11. The census was 126. Review of the facility's Abuse Policy, not dated, showed the following:-It is the policy of the facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures which prohibit and prevent abuse and neglect;-Alleged violation is defined as a situation or occurrence observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor or others, but has not yet been investigated. If verified, could be indication of noncompliance with the federal requirements related to neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were updated and accurate to reflect resident needs. This failure affected three residents (Residents #22, #23, and #24) whose care plans did not address increased need for eating assistance, increased depression, safety concerns, increased confusion, wandering behavior, and recent fall interventions. The sample size was 11. The census was 126. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plans policy dated 9/24, showed:-Policy: It is the policy of the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment;-Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: --The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs and will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure one resident with an indwelling urinary catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder through the urinary tract to drain urine) was provided catheter care and antibiotic flushes as ordered for one of three residents sampled for catheter care (Resident #19). The resident suffered from several urinary infections in the prior months leading to hospitalizations and this failure increased the risk of another infection. The census was 126. Review of the facility's Catheter Care policy revised 5/25, showed:-Policy: It is the policy of the facility to ensure residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use:-Policy Explanation: --Catheter care will be performed every shift and as needed by nursing personnel; --Leg bags will be attached to the resident's thigh or calf making sure to have slack on the tubing to minimize pressure and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer and ensure the resident consumed nutritional supplements for one resident who was identified with significant weight loss and wounds (Resident #19). This failure could result in continued weight loss and/or deterioration of wounds. The sample was 11. The census was 126. Review of the facility's Nutrition/Hydration Management policy, revised 12/25, showed:-Policy: Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure that all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise;-Compliance guidelines: Weight can be a useful indicator of nutritional status. Significant unintended changes in weight (loss or gain) or insidious weight loss (Gradual intended loss over a period of time) may indicate a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services when a nurse dispensed and signed out narcotics and allowed Certified Medication Technician (CMT) J to administer them to two residents (Resident #19 and #22). Additionally, a resident (Resident #17) refused his/her medication, and the nurse disposed of the medications in the resident's trash can. The sample was 11. The census was 126. Review of the facility's Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability policy, dated 9/24, showed:-Policy: It is the policy of this facility to promote safe, high quality patient care, compliant with state and federal regulations regarding monitoring the use of controlled substances. The facility will have safeguards in place to prevent loss, diversion or accidental exposure.-Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: --Controlled substances are stored in a separate compartment of an automated dispensing system or other locked storage unit with access limited to approved personnel; --Specifically compounded or non-stock-controlled substances are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's right to be free from physical abuse was not violated when another resident hit the resident in the face, resulting in the resident's face being scratched (Residents #4 and #5). The sample was five. The census was 113. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy, dated 4/28/25, showed the following: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property; -Definition: Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercations. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-28 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility failed to follow its policy to have an Administrator who planned, directed and monitored compliance with State and Federal government regulatory agencies by not having an active Administrator on-site on a full time basis. The facility census was 123. Review of the facility's (undated) job description for the Administrator, showed: -Job Title: Administrator; -Reports To: Chief Operating Officer; -Status: Exempt; -Positions Summary: -Provides leadership, oversight and administration to all long-term care operations. Responsible for ensuring maximum operating efficiency, overall cost-effectiveness, and strict compliance with all applicable State and Federal rules and regulations; -Develops, monitors and improves…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program policy by failing to thoroughly investigate Resident #4's allegation that Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) BB provided rough care while cleaning him/her up causing a hematoma (a localized collection of blood outside of blood vessels that forms due to injury or trauma) on his/her left inner calf. The resident resided on the fourth floor. The CNA's normal assignment was on the third floor. Review of the facility investigation showed three residents who resided on the fourth floor were interviewed, including Resident #4. No residents from the third floor were interviewed and no staff from either floor were interviewed including staff that worked when the alleged incident occurred. In addition, the facility failed to notify the resident's physician regarding Resident #4's allegation. The sample size was 14. The census was 135. Review of the facility Abuse policy dated 11/22/23, showed: -Definitions: -Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services-DHSS) no later than two hours after one resident (Resident #4) alleged Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) BB was rough while providing personal care, causing a hematoma (a localized collection of blood outside of blood vessels that forms due to injury or trauma) on his/her left inner calf. The sample size was 14. The census was 135. Review of the facility Abuse policy dated 11/22/23, showed: -Definitions: -Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish; -Mistreatment is defined as inappropriate treatment or exploitation of a resident; -Policy: This organization recognizes and respects that each resident has the right to be free from abuse and neglect as defined in the federal regulations; -The facility is committed to developing and operationalizing policies and procedures for screening and training employees, protection of residents and for the prevention,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to keep a resident free from hazards and provide the necessary monitoring and supervision for a resident when outside of the facility. The facility failed to follow their Elopement/Missing Person policy after one resident (Resident #1) left the facility's premises without the staff's knowledge of the resident's whereabouts or expected time of arrival back to the facility. The facility also failed to assess the risk of leaving the facility without notification to staff due to a possible substance abuse disorder when staff found four shot bottles (miniature bottles of 50 milliliters (ml) alcohol) in the resident's bedroom. The sample size was three. The census was 138. Review of the facility's Elopement/Missing Person policy, dated 11/24, showed: -Policy: It is the intent of the facility to provide a safe and home-like environment for all residents and to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. It is the responsibility of all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-26 · tag F0568 — widespreadProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation of a system that assured complete accounting of resident personal funds, and the facility failed to ensure access to resident personal funds was transferred to the facility's new management company upon a change in ownership. The facility also failed to ensure that monies held in the resident trust fund account was reconciled each month. The facility also failed to ensure quarterly statements were distributed to residents and/or their responsible party. This deficient practice affected all residents whose funds were handled by the facility. The census was 115. Review of the facility's undated Resident Personal Funds - Accounting and Management policy, showed: -Hold, safeguard, manage, and account for: Means that the facility must act as fiduciary of the resident's funds and report at least quarterly on the status of these funds in a clear and understandable manner. Managing the resident's financial affairs includes money that an individual gives to the facility for the sake of providing a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at a safe and appetizing temperature for two of two observed meal services. This deficient practice affected all residents who ate meals at the facility, including members of the Resident Council who voiced complaints in the monthly resident council meetings and Residents #1 and #92. The census was 134. Review of the facility's Monitoring Food Temperatures for Meal Service policy, dated 2020, showed: -Guideline: Food temperatures will be monitored to prevent foodborne illness and ensure foods are served at palatable temperatures; -Procedure: Proper procedures are followed to ensure that food temperatures are accurately and safely obtained according to safe handling practices. These procedures include the following steps; -If the serving/holding temperature of a hot food item is not at 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or higher when checked prior to meal service, the item will be reheated to at least 165 degrees (F) for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-26 · tag F0554 — patternAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff adequately supervised residents during medication administration and/or assessed residents to self-administer medications and/or keep medications at their bedside (Residents #54, #61, #17, #81, #29, #88 and #92). The sample was 23. The census was 115. Review of the facility's undated Medication Administration Policy, showed: -Policy: the facility is committed to establishing and maintaining processes that promote safe medication administration; -Medications will be administered by the person licensed or permitted by the state to prepare, administer, and document the administration of medications; -The Director of Nursing (DON) services will supervise and direct all nursing personnel who administer medications and/or have related functions; -Medications will be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frames; -Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the attending practitioner,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate Resident #524's injury of unknown origin. An x-ray confirmed a right femur/hip fracture on 3/15/25 and the resident was sent to a hospital for evaluation and treatment. In addition, the facility failed to interview all staff with knowledge of Resident #504's fall from bed, which caused a laceration above the resident's right eye, and failed to interview residents and staff after one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) allegedly cursed at Resident #507, and failed to investigate Resident #502's left upper and back arm bruises. This deficient practice affected four out of 30 sampled residents. The census was 114. Review of the facility's Abuse policy and procedure dated 11/22/23, showed: Definitions: -Injuries of unknown source - An injury should be classified as an injury of unknown source when ALL of the following criteria are met: The source of the injury was not observed by any person. The resident could not explain the source…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated in a manner to maintain dignity when one resident continued to have a certain staff assigned to them despite their request for a different staff member (Resident #84). In addition, staff used their personal cell phones in resident care areas and while providing care to the residents. The sample was 23. The census was 115. Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, dated 11/22/24, showed: -Policy: The facility recognizes and respects that each resident has the right to exercise his or her rights as a resident of the facility and as citizen or resident of the United States. Exercising right means that residents have autonomy and choice, to the maximum extent possible, about how they wish to live their everyday lives and receive care, subject to the facility's rules, as long as those rules do not violate a regulatory requirement. The facility will ensure that facility operations and systems are implemented in a manner that facilitates the resident/resident representative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents or the resident's responsible party (RP) were invited to participate in all aspects of person-centered care planning for one resident who was not notified after his/her insurance was changed by the facility (Resident #67). The sample was 23. The census was 115. Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, dated 11/22/24, showed: -The facility recognizes and respects that each resident has the right to exercise his or her rights as a resident of the facility and as a citizen or resident of the United States. Exercising rights mean that residents have autonomy and choice, to the maximum extent possible, about how they wish to live their everyday lives and receive care, subject to the facility's rules, as long as those rules do not violate a regulatory requirement. The facility will ensure that facility operations and systems are implemented in a manner that the resident/resident representative can exercise his or his rights without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify third party (TPL) within 30 days when a resident expired. This affected two residents who expired (Residents #171 and #172). The census was 115. Review of the facility's undated Resident Personal Funds - Accounting and Management policy, showed: -Hold, safeguard, manage, and account for: Means that the facility must act as fiduciary of the resident's funds and report at least quarterly on the status of these funds in a clear and understandable manner. Managing the resident's financial affairs includes money that an individual gives to the facility for the sake of providing a resident with a non-covered service. In these instances, the facility will provide a receipt to the gift giver and retain a copy; -Procedures/Requirements: The resident may manage his or his own personal funds; -The resident may designate a representative to manage his or her personal funds; -The resident may have the facility hold, safeguard, and manage his or her personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify hospice services after a resident fell and was transferred to the emergency room. The facility also failed to notify the resident's responsible party prior to transferring the resident to the emergency room (Resident #222). The sample size was 23. The census was 115. Review of the facility's undated Hospice Services Policy and Procedure, showed: -Definitions: Hospice Care means a comprehensive set of services identified and coordinated by an interdisciplinary group to provide for the physical, psychosocial, spiritual and emotional needs of a terminally ill patient and/or family members, as delineated in a specific patient plan of care; -Terminally Ill means the individual has a medical prognosis that his or her life expectancy is six months or less if the illness runs its normal course; -Policy: The facility contracts for hospice services for residents who wish to participate in such programs; -Specific Procedures/Requirements; -The facility has entered into a contractual arrangement for hospice services to ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #507) was free from verbal abuse and treated with respect and dignity, when a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) used profanity at the resident and to not identity him/herself after being asked. In addition, the CNA continued to worked at the facility and was assigned to the resident. The sample was 30. The census was 114. Review of the facility's Resident's Rights policy, dated 11/22/24, showed the resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the resident. The resident has the right to exercise his or her rights as a resident of the facility and as citizen or resident of the United States. The resident has the right to be free of interference, coercion, discrimination, and reprisal from the facility in exercising his or her rights and to be supported by the facility in the exercise of his or her rights. Review of Resident #507's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate and individualized care plans to address the specific needs of the residents (Residents #87 and #99). The sample was 23. The census was 115. Review of the facility's Resident Centered Care Plan Policy, dated 7/17/23, showed: -Policy: A person-centered comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs shall be developed for each resident. To the extent practicable, the resident/resident representative will be provided with opportunities to participate in the care planning process. -A comprehensive care plan for each resident will be developed within seven (7) days of completion of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment; -The comprehensive care plan will be developed by a Care Planning/interdisciplinary Team (IDT) which includes at a minimum: -The resident's attending physician; -A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services and/or treatment to increase or prevent reduction of range of motion. The facility failed to develop a measurable, goal oriented restorative nursing program, and/or exercise program, to ensure resident's requiring physical assistance were assisted by staff to maintain or improve their physical abilities, per facility policy. The facility provided a list of 16 current residents who had been discharged from skilled therapy services (Physical therapy (PT), Occupational Therapy (OT) or Speech Therapy (ST)) within the past 90 days. Of those 16, three were identified who would benefit from services to prevent reduction of range of motion (Residents #527, #525, and #526). The census was 114. Review of the facility's undated Restorative Nursing Services Policy and Procedure, showed: -Definitions: Restorative Nursing Program: refers to nursing interventions that promote the resident's ability to living as independently and safely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control standards by not implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for residents with wounds requiring treatments (Resident #10). In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff used good infection control practices for one resident when staff failed to perform hand hygiene and prepared medications with his/her bare hand (Resident #70) and when one resident's catheter bag (a urine drainage bag that attaches to a catheter, (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) was observed on the floor. (Resident #13). The sample was 23. The census was 115. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-07-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions. Specifically, the facility: failed to label food items in dry storage, the chef cooler, the freezer, the produce walk in, snack food and drink walk in refrigerator, and deli/sandwich preparation refrigerator; failed to clean the kitchen floors, preparation table shelves and drawers, stove, ovens, air fryer, red colored hotbox, the tilt skillet, and the steamer/convection oven; and failed to ensure cutting boards did not have cut marks (scarring) from the knives. The facility census was 106. The findings included: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 7/25/23 at 10:59 a.m. the following items were not labeled in the dry storage room: -one (1) - 11 pound vanilla crème icing tub did not have a label and was covered in plastic wrap, -one (1) two (2) pound bag of powdered sugar did not have a label and was wrapped in plastic wrap, - plastic utensils were in open boxes, not covered, -one (1) number 10 can (holds approximately six (6) pounds…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident had a choice of code status documented in the medical record (Resident #78). In addition, the facility failed to ensure four out of 23 sampled residents' code status' were reviewed annually (Residents #56, #103, #42 and #84). The census was 110. Review of the facility Life Sustaining Treatment policy, revised [DATE], showed: -Practice: Upon admission the resident will be made aware of his/her right to make informed decisions through the information contained in the resident handbook and other materials furnished by Social Services and/or the business office; -Should a resident have an advance directive, it will be filed in the front of the resident's medical record; -In Missouri, a CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, life saving measures)/treatment directive order form will be completed according to the advance directive and signed by the physician and the resident or his/her legal representative or surrogate family member; -The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff regarding discharge status for two out of three closed records reviewed (Residents #110 and #109). The census was 110. 1. Review of Resident #110's discharge MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -Type of discharge (planned or unplanned): Unplanned; -Discharge status: To community; -discharge date : [DATE]. Review of the resident's progress notes, dated 11/6/19, showed the resident transferred to the hospital on this date and time. Family refused to wait on discharge papers from this nurse and stated the resident still had his/her personal items in the room. 2. Review of Resident #109's discharge MDS, dated [DATE] showed: -discharge date : [DATE]; -Discharge status: Acute hospital. Review of the resident's progress notes, showed: -On 10/9/19 at 11:24 A.M., the social worker received a call from another facility and the resident's guardian was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-10 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident admitted into a Medicaid certified bed, regardless of payment source, had the DA-124c level I screen (used to evaluate for the presence of psychiatric disorders and intellectual disabilities) completed prior to admission into the Medicaid certified bed, for one of five residents investigated for preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) (Resident #88). The sample was 23. The census was 110. Review of Resident #88's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/8/19, showed: -Section A0410: Unit certification or licensure designation: Unit is Medicare and/or Medicaid certified; -Section A1500: PASARR: No -Section A1510: Level II PASARR conditions: -A 1510: A serious mental illness: blank; -A 1510: B intellectual disability: blank; -A 1510: C other related condition: blank; -Section 1550: Conditions related to ID/DD status: -A 1550 A: Down syndrome: No; -A 1550 B: Autism: No; -A 1550 C: Epilepsy: No; -A 1550 D: Other organic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed ensure the services provided or arranged by the facility met professional standards of quality, by failing to follow physician orders for a fall mat for one resident (Resident #87) who had a history of falling. The sample was 23. The census was 110. Review of Resident #87's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/5/19, showed: -Moderately impaired cognition; -Extensive assistance of staff required for bed mobility, dressing, grooming and bathing; -Total assist of staff required for transfers; -Used a wheelchair; -Frequently incontinent of urine and occasionally incontinent of bowel; -Diagnoses included heart failure, high blood pressure, diabetes, high cholesterol and depression. Review of the resident's medical record, showed: -On 12/3/19, the resident was found on the floor next to the bed, and was unable to tell staff what happened. Intervention to prevent falls included: adequate lightening, call device within reach, personal items in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain proper placement of an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder for purpose of continual urine drainage) and failed to obtain physician orders for the catheter. The facility identified seven residents as having indwelling urinary catheters. Of those seven, five were chosen for the sample. Of those five, problems were found with two residents (Residents #106 and #78). The sample was 23. The census was 110. Review of the facility's catheter care policy, revised April 2019, showed: -Policy: Catheter care is performed each shift and as needed to keep catheter and perineal area clean; -The urinary drainage bag and tubing is not changed unless absolutely necessary and it is of utmost importance to maintain strict aseptic (free from contamination) technique; -Catheter Care Practice: Check catheter drainage and tubing at beginning of the shift, periodically throughout the shift, and at the end of the shift. Check to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free of significant medication errors for one resident (Resident #103) when the facility staff administered a medication then immediately initiated a tube feeding (nutrition administered per a gastric tube, g-tube. A tube placed through the abdomen into the stomach), for a medication that should not be given with food. The census was 110. Review of Resident #103's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/13/19, showed: -The resident is rarely or never understood; -The resident required total assistance of staff for grooming, dressing, bathing, hygiene, transfers and eating; -Diagnoses included stroke with hemiplegia or hemiparesis (paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body), diabetes, high cholesterol, dementia, and seizures. Review of the Resident's electronic physician order sheet (ePOS), dated 1/1/20, showed: -Phenytoin (a medication used to treat seizures) 125 milligrams (mg) per milliliter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, for two of two medication carts reviewed. The census was 110. Review of the facility's pharmacy services, storage and expiration dating of medications, biologicals, syringes and needles policy, updated 10/2016, showed: -Facility should ensure that medications and biologicals that have an expired date on the label, have been retained longer than recommended by manufacturer or supplier guidelines or have been contaminated or deteriorated are stored separate from other medications until destroyed or returned to the pharmacy or supplier; -Once any medication or biological package is opened, the facility should follow manufacturers/supplier guidelines with respect to expiration dates for opened medications. Facility staff should record the date opened on the medication container when the medication has shortened…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the hand hygiene policy during personal care for one of three residents observed during personal care (Resident #17). The census was 110. Review of the facility's hand hygiene policy, dated 10/18, showed: -Purpose: To establish guidelines for proper hand hygiene practices for infection control; -Responsibility: It is the responsibility of all employees to follow this policy regarding hand hygiene for infection control; -Policy: Hand hygiene will be maintained at all times. Hands will be washed with soap and water when they are visibility soiled or contaminated with blood or other body fluids; -Practice: Recommended times for handwashing with soap and water, when hands are visibly soiled or after contact with blood or body fluids. Review of Resident #17's care plan, revised on 4/16/19, showed: -Problems: Bowel and bladder, the resident is frequently incontinent of urine due to confusion. He/she needs reminder to use the toilet and then needs extensive staff assistance once he/she is in the bathroom.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2020-01-10 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the required information for the daily nursing staffing information by not posting the name of the facility and daily census for five of five days of observation. The census was 110. Observation on 1/6/20 at 1:00 P.M., 1/7/20 at 8:45 A.M., 1/8/20 at 7:26 A.M. and 1:45 P.M., 1/9/20 at 2:00 P.M., and 1/10/20 at 7:45 A.M., showed the name of the facility and the daily census not listed on the nursing staffing information. During an interview on 1/10/20 at 1:42 P.M., the Administrator said he did notice that the name of the facility was not on the nursing staff information. He would expect the posting to include the name of the facility and the resident census.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$260,092 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $91,055 — penalty dated 2026-01-16
- $169,037 — penalty dated 2024-11-26
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-08 for 56 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-02-14 for 91 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELLISVILLE OPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/01/2024 |
| FISCHER, ELAZAR | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 15% | since 07/01/2024 |
| ADS FAMILY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| JJ FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| PC8 CAPITAL GROUP LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| ELLISVILLE PROPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| STERN, SIMON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| BARTH, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/06/2025 |
| PHATAK, SARINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/06/2025 |
| STERN, AHARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| BURTON, NOAH | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| GREENWALD, BRIAN | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| STERN, SHIFRA | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| WEISS, HILLEL | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| ADS CAPITAL TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/18/2024 |
| ISRAEL DISCOUNT BANK OF NEW YORK - IDB BANK OF YORK | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/26/2024 |
| SJ FAMILY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/18/2024 |
| SJ HEALTHCARE CAPITAL LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/18/2024 |
| SUPERIOR BACK OFFICE SOLUTIONS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/18/2024 |
| BIRNBAUM, MOSHE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/18/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265766. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.