Fieser Nursing Center
404 Main Street, Fenton, MO 63026 · For profit - Individual · 47 certified beds · (636) 343-4344 Medicaid only — no Medicare
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.6% | 18.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.3% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 9.1% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 18.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.8% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.4% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.5% | 25.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.3% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.3% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.2% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.7% | 23.5% | 17.1% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 47 beds and averages 36.7 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-02-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication error by not administering the resident's seizure medication when an error resulted in the order being deleted from the physician order sheet, for at least three months, for one resident reviewed for hospitalization. This resulted in the resident having a seizure that resulted in hospitalization (Resident #1). The census was 39. Review of the facility's undated Physician's Services policy, showed: -Intent: It is the policy of the facility to provide Physician Services in accordance with State and Federal regulations: -A physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist must provide orders for the resident's immediate care and needs; -Each resident will remain under the care of a physician; -All physician or other health care professional verbal orders, including telephone orders, will be immediately recorded, dated, and signed by the person receiving the order; -All…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) complete and accurate direct care staffing information no less frequently than quarterly, for three quarters preceding the annual survey. The census was 38. Review of the fiscal years Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) staffing report, showed the facility triggered for failing to submit data for:-Fiscal year quarter 1, 2025 (October 1 to December 31);-Fiscal year quarter 2, 2025 (January 1 to March 31);-Fiscal year quarter 3, 2025 (April 1 through June 30). During an interview on 9/25/25 at 10:18 A.M., the Administrator said she has not been able to log in to the account to submit the PBJ. The account kept saying it was the incorrect password. The help desk would send a new password, but she still was not able to get in. The PBJs are supposed to be submitted quarterly. The Administrator no longer has an account to submit PBJs.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-30 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their facility assessment was reviewed and updated as necessary and at least annually. The census was 38.Review of the facility's Facility Assessment policy, revised 9/18/17, showed:-Requirement: Nursing facilities will conduct, document and annually review a facility-wide assessment, which includes both their resident population and the resources the facility needs to care for their residents;-Purpose: The purpose of the assessment is to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. This assessment is used to make decisions about direct care staff needs, as well as the facility's capabilities to provide services to the residents in the facility;-Guidelines for Conducting the Assessment includes:-The facility will review and update this assessment annually or whenever there is/the facility plans for any change that would require a modification to any part of this assessment. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment Tool, dated 1/4/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-30 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure quality assessment and assurance (QAA) meetings consisted of the required committee members when the Medical Director failed to attend the facility's QAA meetings. The census was 38.Review of the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program policy, dated 1/7/25, showed:-Guiding Values or Principles: The written QAPI plan for the facility will identify and address areas that need improvement in order to ensure the best quality of life for the people in our community;-QAA Committee and oversight of QAPI in our Community:-The Administrator, all department managers, Medical Director, consulting pharmacist, residents, family members or responsible parties, and at least three general staff members (one from each department);-Reporting on QAPI Activities:-The Administrator will discuss our QAPI activities at the quarterly QAA meeting that consists of all the department managers, Medical Director, pharmacy consultant, resident, general staff, etc. During an interview on 9/25/25 at 10:34 A.M., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control standards by not implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and use good infection control practices while providing wound treatments on two residents (Resident #15 and Resident #5). The sample was 12. The census was 38. Review of the facility's Clean Dressing Change policy, dated 1/16/25, showed:-Intent: It is the policy of the facility to change dressing in accordance with state and federal regulations. -Procedure: -Verify and review physician's orders for procedure; -Perform hand hygiene and assemble equipment and supplies for dressing change; -Put on gloves and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-30 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) received a minimum of 12 hours of ongoing education annually for three out of three sampled CNAs (CNA D, CNA C and Certified Medication Technician (CMT) E). The census was 38.Review of the facility's Required In-service Training for Nurse Aides, dated, 1/16/25, showed-Intent: It is the policy of the facility to provide a staff education plan in accordance with state and federal regulations;-Procedure: Required in-service training for nurse aides will: -Be sufficient to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides, but must be no less than 12 hours per year; -Include dementia management training and resident abused prevention training; -Address areas of weakness as determined in nurse aides' performance review and facility assessment and may address the special needs of residents as determined by the facility staff; -For nurse aides providing services to individuals with cognitive impairments, also address the care of the cognitively impaired.Review of the list of CNA's and CMT's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-30 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to self-administer medications and physician orders were maintained for self-administration of medication for one resident observed with medications left at bedside (Resident #41). The sample was 12. The census was 38.Review of Resident #41's medical record, showed diagnoses included asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, lung disease) overlap syndrome (symptoms of both asthma and COPD) and heart failure. Review of the resident's physician order summary (POS), showed:-An order, dated 8/16/25, for albuterol sulfate hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) aerosol inhaler (medication used to treat asthma); 90 microgram (mcg)/actuation (release of a single dose); inhale two puffs by mouth three times a day;-An order, dated 8/16/25, for Incruse Ellipta (umeclidinium, medication used to treat COPD) blister with device; 62.5 mcg/actuation; one puff inhalation; inhale one puff once daily;-An order, dated 9/18/25, for Breo Ellipta (fluticasone furoate-vilanterol, medication used to treat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure reports with respect to surveys, certifications and complaint investigations conducted during the preceding three years were available for review by residents, family members and legal representatives of residents. The census was 38.Review of the facility's list of resident rights, undated, showed the right to be fully informed of state survey reports. Observations on four out of four days of survey, showed no reports with respect to surveys, certifications and complaints available for review. There was no notice posted regarding availability of survey results. During a group interview on 9/29/25 at 1:30 P.M., four out of four residents, whom the facility identified as alert and oriented, said they did not know they had the right to review survey results. They would like to be able to review survey results. During an interview on 9/29/25 at 1:16 P.M., the Social Services Director (SSD) said she did not know if survey results were available anywhere for people to review. During an interview on 9/29/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-30 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience by not limiting one resident's as needed (PRN) psychotropic (a medication used to treat mental and emotional disorders) to 14 days (Resident #40). The sample was 12. The census was 38. Review of the facility's Pharmacy Services- Drug Regimen Free from Unnecessary Drugs policy, dated 1/16/25, showed:-Intent: The intent of this policy is each resident's entire drug medication regimen is managed and to promote or maintain the residents highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being; The facility implements PRN orders for psychotropic medications are used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited;-Procedure: PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. Review of the facility's Psychotropic Management policy, dated 1/16/25, showed:-Policy statement: The facility will monitor use of psychotropic medications by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-30 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document a discharge summary that included a recapitulation of stay, final summary of resident's status at the time of discharge, and reconciliation of medications for one resident sampled for discharges (Resident #38). The sample was 12. The census was 38.Review of the facility's Discharge Summary policy, undated, showed:-Intent: It is the policy of the facility to assure that a discharge summary is completed in accordance to State and Federal requirements;-Procedure:--When the facility anticipates discharge, a resident must have a discharge summary that includes, but is not limited to, the following:-a. A post-discharge plan of care that is developed with the participation of the resident and, with the resident's consent, the resident representative(s), which will assist the resident to adjust to his or her new living environment;--When the facility anticipates discharge, a resident must have a discharge summary that includes, but is not limited to,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-30 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, a federally required screening for all applicants to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility to help ensure individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long-term care) for one of two residents sampled for PASARR review (Resident #4). The sample was 12. The census was 38.Review of the facility's Coordination and PASARR Program policy, dated 1/16/25, showed:-Intent: It is the policy of the facility to assure that all residents admitted to the facility receive a PASARR in accordance with State and Federal regulations;-Procedure included:-Preadmission screening for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability. The facility will not admit, on or after January 1, 1989, any new residents with mental disorder, unless the State mental health authority has determined, based on an independent physical and mental evaluation performed by a person or entity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 45 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' care plans were updated routinely and accurately reflected residents' code status orders. Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders were not accurately reflected in four of 22 sampled residents' care plans (Residents #20, #25, #7 and #37). The census was 38.Review of the facility's Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plans Policy, revised 1/26/25, showed:-The facility must develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth by state and federal regulation, including measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment;-The resident will have the right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered care plan, including by not limited to: participation in the planning process, the right to participate in establishing goals and outcomes of care, and the right to receive or deny services included in the plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident with a pressure wound (skin or soft tissue injury that develops with prolonged periods of pressure over specific areas of the body) received necessary treatments and services to promote healing (Resident #15). The sample size was 12. The census was 38. Review of the facility's Treatment and Services to Prevent and Heal Pressure Ulcers policy, undated, showed:Intent: It is the policy of the facility to ensure it identifies and provides needed care and services that are resident centered, in accordance with the resident's preference, goals for care and professional standards of practice that will meet each resident's physician, mental, and psychosocial needs; -Procedure: The facility will ensure that based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent, with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing; The pressure sore will be evaluated weekly and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications kept in facility medication rooms were within the date of expiration and failed to remove one of 22 sampled resident's expired hospital discharge medications (Resident #22). Concerns were noted in one of one medication rooms during the survey period. The census was 38.Review of the facility's Storage of Medications policy, revised 1/16/25, showed:-Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels shall be returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing;-The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the pharmacy or destroyed;-The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage AND preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. 1. Observation of the facility's only medication room on 9/26/25 at 11:46 A.M., showed:-One bottle of GeriCare Stool Softener Docusate Sodium (a type of laxative used to treat occasional constipation) 100 milligram (mg)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services consistent with acceptable standards of practice for one resident when staff failed to accurately assess and document a wounds appearance, odors, the condition of the surrounding skin, resulting in the failure to timely identify the worsening of a left heel wound. The resident was sent to the hospital for evaluation of the wound. The hospital staff assessed the wound and identified the wound to have necrotic (dead) skin, very malodorous (very foul odor), and the surrounding skin erythematous (abnormally red and inflamed). The hospital diagnosed the wound as osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) and gangrene (a serious condition that occurs when tissue dies due to a lack of blood flow or a bacterial infection) (Resident #1). The sample size was four. The census was 38. Review of the facility's undated Wound Management policy, showed: -Purpose: to assist the facility in the care, services and documentation related to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff followed acceptable standards of nursing when staff failed to accurately assess open areas to the buttock and coccyx (tailbone) for one resident. When the wound was assessed by the wound care provider, the wounds were identified as stage III (full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed) pressure injuries. New treatment orders were given by the wound care provider, but not transcribed to the resident's physician orders or completed as ordered. (Resident #2). The sample size was four. The census was 38. Review of the facility's undated Treatment/Services to Prevent and Heal Pressure Ulcers policy, showed: -Intent: to ensure it identifies and provides needed care and services that are resident centered, in accordance with the resident's preferences, goals for care and professional standards of practice that will meet each resident's physical, mental and psychosocial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0636 — widespreadAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete comprehensive resident assessments on admission and at least annually for six of 12 residents sampled (Residents #101, #104, #102, #51, #52, and #53). The quarterly assessments had not been completed since year 2022 for some sampled residents. The census was 39. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) version 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, showed: -For all non-admission assessments, the MDS completion date must be no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD); -For the admission assessment, the MDS Completion Date must be no later than 13 days after the entry date; -Encoding Data: Within 7 days after completing a resident's MDS assessment or tracking record, the provider must encode the MDS data (i.e., enter the information into the facility MDS software). -Assessment Transmission: Comprehensive assessments must be transmitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0638 — widespreadAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete quarterly resident assessments for nine of 12 residents sampled (Residents #55, #101, #104, #102, #51, #54, #151, #53, and #103). The quarterly assessments had not been completed since year 2022 for some sampled residents. The census was 39. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) version 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, showed: -For all non-admission assessments, the MDS completion date must be no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). 1. Review of Resident #55's medical record, showed admitted [DATE]. Review of the resident's MDS records, showed a quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], in process. 2. Review of Resident #101's medical record, showed admitted on [DATE]. Review of the resident's MDS records, showed a quarterly MDS dated [DATE], in process. 3. Review of Resident #104's medical record, showed admitted [DATE]. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0640 — widespreadEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and transmit required Minimum Data Sets (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) as required for 11 of 12 sampled residents (Residents #55, #101, #104, #102, #51, #152, #153, #54, #53, #103, and #151) when the facility failed to ensure staff had the required credentials to submit and transmit MDS data. The facility failed to transmit data since February 2022. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. The census was 39. Review of the MDS aversion 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, showed: -For all non-admission assessments, the MDS completion date must be no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD); -For the admission assessment, the MDS Completion Date must be no later than 13 days after the entry date; -Encoding Data: Within 7 days after completing a resident's MDS assessment or tracking record, the provider must encode the MDS data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to The Centers of Medicare and Medicaid services (CMS) complete and accurate direct care staffing information no less frequently than quarterly, for the 4 available quarters immediately preceding the annual survey. The census was 39. Review of the facility's Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report, showed the facility triggered for failing to submit data for: -Fiscal year quarter 1, 2023 (October 1 - December 31); -Fiscal year quarter 2, 2023 (January 1 through March 31); -Fiscal year quarter 3, 2023 (April 1 through June 30, 2023); -Fiscal year quarter 4, 2023 (July 1 through September 30, 2023). During an interview on 2/18/24 at 9:50 A.M., the Administrator said the facility does not submit PBJ reports. She did not think they had to. About a year ago she called to get a password to be able to submit the PBJ reports and was not provided one. She will call again this week to follow up. On 2/20/24 at 10:41 A.M., the Administrator said she was just given access to submit PBJ reports and will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-20 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to demonstrate the development and implementation of corrective actions as part of their quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) activities when there was a known deficient practice related to the resident assessment completion and transmission, that had the potential to affect all residents that reside in the facility and had been an ongoing issue at the facility. The facility had been cited for their failure to complete and transmit resident assessments during their survey completed on 12/20/21 and achieved compliance on 2/3/22. During the current survey, review of the sampled resident records, showed the facility fell out of compliance with these same requirements as early as 2/25/22, only 22 days after reaching compliance and remained out of compliance. The sample was 12. The census was 39. 1. Review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement program, last updated 1/4/24, showed: -Purpose: The vision of the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a water management program to reduce the growth/spread of Legionella (a bacterium that can live and grow in water systems and causes legionnaires disease, a severe form of pneumonia) and other opportunistic pathogens in the building's water system. This failure had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. In addition, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control practices during personal care for two of two residents observed to receive personal care (Residents #153 and #54) and failed to sanitize shared medical equipment per acceptable standards of practice between resident care for two of two residents observed to be transferred with a mechanical lift (Residents #54 and #53). The census was 39. The sample was 12. 1. During an interview on 2/18/24 at 9:50 A.M. and 2:00 P.M., the facility water management program policies and procedures were requested from the administrator. Review of all records provided by the facility as of survey exit on 2/20/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-20 · tag F0637 — patternAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a significant change in status assessment be completed within 14 days after a determination has been made that a significant change occurred for two of thee residents sampled who enrolled in a hospice program (Residents #153 and #154). The facility identified nine residents who received hospice services. The census was 39. 1. Review of Resident #153's medical record, showed: -admitted [DATE]; -Diagnoses included heart failure, chronic kidney disease and diabetes; -A hospice admission form, showed the resident admitted to hospice on 12/28/23. Review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) records, showed: -An admission MDS dated [DATE]; -A quarterly MDS in progress dated 2/22/24; -No significant change MDS assessment completed within 14 days after the resident's admission to hospice. 2. Review of Resident #154's medical record, showed: -admitted [DATE]; -Diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-20 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment was accurately coded for three of three resident closed records reviewed for sampled residents with resident assessments completed and transmitted (Residents #7, #8, and #2). The census was 39. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) 3.0 Nursing Home Comprehensive assessment, showed: -Section A2100 Discharge status: Complete if Identification information Entry/Discharge reporting A0310F is coded any of the following: -Discharge return not anticipated; -Discharge return anticipated; -Death in facility tracking record. 1. Review of Resident #7's medical record, showed: -discharged [DATE]; -A social service note, dated [DATE] at 12:08 P.M., resident discharged to a different nursing home today. The resident's spouse to transport and sign papers. Review of the resident's discharge MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -admitted [DATE]; -Discharge [DATE] return not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate and individualized comprehensive care plans to address specific needs of the residents for five of 12 sampled residents and one expanded sampled resident (Residents #52, #54, #1, #151, #152 and #153). The census was 39. 1. Review of the facility's updated Care Plan policy, showed: -Intent: It is the policy of the facility to promote seamless interdisciplinary care for our residents by utilizing the interdisciplinary plan of care based on assessment, planning, treatment, service, and intervention. It is utilized to plan for and manage resident care as evidenced by documentation from admission through discharge for each resident; -The care plan will identify priority problems and needs to be addressed by the interdisciplinary team, and will reflect the resident's strengths, limitations, and goals. The care plan will be complete, current, realistic, time specific and appropriate to the individual needs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manor to prevent the risk of accidents and injury for two residents observed to be transferred using an unsafe technique, out of thee residents observed to be transferred (Residents #54 and #153). The census was 39. The sample was 12. 1. Review of the facility's undated Sit-to-Stand lift (mechanical lift that supports a resident to stand and transfer) policy, showed: -Sit-to-stand resident lifts are for residents who: Have good torso and upper-body strength, can hold up their neck and head, can hold on to the grips with at least one hand, are 25-75% weight bearing in their legs, ankles, knees and feet, and are cooperative; -Have the resident begin in a seated position on the edge of a bed or chair; -Wrap the center of the sling around the resident's back so that the upper straps come just under the resident's arms; -Bring the narrower section of the sling around and under each of the resident's thighs, towards the middle; -Hook the straps onto the attachment points on the lift; -Ask the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-20 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each nurse aide had no less than twelve hours of in-service education per year based on their individual performance review and calculated by their employment date rather than the calendar year, for 5 of 5 sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) sampled. The facility identified eight CNAs employed for more than a year. The census was 39. Review of the Facility Assessment Tool, dated 1/4/24, completed by the facility, showed: -Staff training, education, and competencies: Training and/or education is verified to assure staff are prepared to care for our residents. Competencies that are necessary to provide the level and types of support and care needed for our resident population are also verified; -CNA: Required in-service training for nurse aides: --Sufficient to ensure the continuing competencies of nurse aides, but must be no less than 12 hours per year; --Include dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training; --Address areas of weakness as determined and may address the special needs of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored per acceptable standards of practice. The facility identified two medication/treatment carts. One of the two carts was checked for medication storage. Issues were found for 7 out of 12 insulin pens, undated. In addition, four topical ointments were unlabeled with a resident name. The census was 39. Review of the facility's undated Medication Cart Policy, showed: -The medication cart is to be clean and organized; -Over the counter medications are to be labeled when opened with the date on the bottle; -Staff to be checking expiration dates on all medications frequently. Review of the facility's undated insulin storage policy, showed: -Policy: to ensure resident medications are stored properly; -Procedure: Check expiration date before using, do not use if beyond expiration date. Observation on 2/19/24 at 10:00 A.M., of the nurse medication cart, showed: -Four Novolog (fast acting insulin) insulin pens, opened and in use, no resident names, dates when opened or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-20 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a person to serve as the Director of Dietary with the appropriate certification, when a consultant Registered Dietician (RD) was not employed full-time with the facility. This had the potential to affect all residents who consume meals at the facility. The census was 39. Review of the facility's director of dietary job description, showed: -Dietary Manager: -Evaluating kitchen equipment and replacing it as necessary; -Developing health and safety policies for the facility; -Creating procedures for preparing and storing food safely; -Interviewing and hiring kitchen employees; -Supervising kitchen employees as they prepare food; -Conducting employee performance evaluations; -Analyzing the needs of every resident, client, student, or patient in the facility; -Managing daily food service operations; -Recruiting dietary staff; -Interacting with customers to ensure satisfaction; -Ensuring budget, safety, and compliance with regulations; -The job description failed to include the requirements that the director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-20 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to explicitly inform the resident or his or her representative of their right not to sign an arbitration agreement (a private process where disputing parties agree that one or several other individuals can make a decision about the dispute after receiving evidence and hearing arguments) as a condition of admission, or as a requirement to continue to receive care at the facility, for two of two residents sampled for review of the arbitration agreements (Resident #106 and #108). The facility identified 28 residents who currently resided in the facility with signed arbitration agreements. The census was 39. 1. Review of the facility's admission packet, showed: -Page 25: (initials) Alternative dispute resolution addendum: --This alternative dispute resolution addendum is attached to and made a part of the admission agreement between the facility and the resident; --All clams, disputes, and controversies arising out of or in any manner relating, directly or indirectly, to the resident's care or stay at the facility (in each case,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-20 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate one or more individuals with specialized training in infection prevention and control as the Infection Preventionist (IP) for the facility's infection prevention and control program. The census was 39. Review of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) policy, showed: -Infection preventionist: this person will be the hub of the ASP. They will have the knowledge and expertise to effectively develop, implement and monitor the ASP. During an interview on 2/19/24 at 11:15 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the facility has an IP, however the nurse has not completed all the infection control modules. The DON was uncertain how many training modules had been completed. During an interview on 2/19/24 at 2:42 P.M., the IP said she has been the facility infection preventionist as of 8/2023. She has completed one infection control training module as of 8/2023. She has other duties at the facility and assists on the resident floor with care, resulting in not having time to complete the trainings. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely notify the resident's physician after a change in condition occurred for one resident (Resident #9). The sample was 12. The census was 39. Review of the facility's undated Change in Condition policy and procedure, showed: -A resident change in condition is a sudden deviation from the resident's baseline in physical, cognitive, behavioral or functional status; -The nurse will obtain a current set of vital signs and obtain the proper assessment needed to report to the physician; -The facility will promptly notify the residents responsible party and the physician of the change in condition. The facility will talk with the physician to obtain orders for appropriate treatment and monitoring; -The facility will promote family and the resident right to make choices about his/her own treatment; -The charge nurse is to document all details about the encounter as appropriate. Review of Resident #9's medical record, showed: -Diagnoses included: dysphagia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) received personal hygiene assistance in accordance with their needs (Resident #153), for one of two residents observed to receive personal care. The sample was 12. The census was 39. Review of the facility's undated Perineal care (cleansing of the surfaces to include the buttocks and genitals) Procedure, showed: -Gather necessary supplies; -Perform hand hygiene and put on gloves; -Gently clean around the perineal area, including the inner thighs and outside genitals; -Only wipe in a front to back motion; -Use a clean wipe for each stroke, wipe from front to back on both sides of the genitals; -Remove gloves and perform hand hygiene; -Assist the resident on to the side to expose the buttocks; -Wash the buttocks and the anal area using the same front to back technique; -If needed, change the linens and/or place a clean waterproof pad underneath the resident; -Assist the resident into a comfortable position and lower the bed; -Cover…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident with pressure ulcers (injury to the skin and underlying tissues as a result of pressure or friction) received services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing of the pressure ulcer when a certified nursing assistant (CNA) removed the dressing and failed to inform the nurse (Resident #54). This resulted in the resident's pressure ulcer being without treatment or protection from friction for three hours. The facility identified five residents with facility acquired pressure ulcers. The census was 39. Review of the facility's undated Physician Services policy, showed: -It is the policy of the facility to provide physician services in accordance to state and federal regulations; -All physician orders will be followed as prescribed and if not followed, the reason shall be recorded in the resident's medical record during the shift. Review of Resident #54's medical record, showed: -Diagnoses included dementia and pressure ulcer of the sacral region (tailbone area)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-20 · tag F0636 — widespreadAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete comprehensive resident assessments using the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, within 14 calendar days after admission into the facility and not less than every 12 months for seven of 12 sampled residents (Residents #155, #53, #203, #52, #202, #204 and #201). The census was 34. 1. Review of Resident #155's medical record, showed an admission date of 8/11/21. Review of the resident's MDS record, showed no admission MDS completed. 2. Review of Resident #53's medical record, showed an admission date of 5/5/21. Review of the resident's MDS record, showed no admission MDS completed.: 3. Review of Resident #203's medical record, showed an admission date of 2/4/10. Review of the resident's MDS record, showed -A quarterly MDS, completed 5/16/20; -No annual MDS completed. 4. Review of Resident #52's medical record, showed an admission date of 10/27/21. Review of the resident's MDS record, showed no admission MDS completed. 5. Review of Resident #202's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-20 · tag F0638 — widespreadAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess residents using the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, for 11 (Residents #53, #55, #103, #104, #105, #153, #155, #156, #201, #202 and #203) of 12 sampled residents. The census was 34. 1. Review of Resident #53's medical record, showed: -An admission date of 5/5/21; -No quarterly MDS assessment completed. 2. Review of Resident #55's medical record, showed: -An admission date of 9/6/20; -No quarterly MDS assessments completd. 3. Review of Resident #103's medical record, showed: -An admission date of 12/1/19; -A quarterly MDS, completed 9/2/20; -No further MDS assessments completed. 4. Review of Resident #104's medical record, showed: -An admission date of 11/18/17; -A quarterly MDS, completed 9/2/20; -No further MDS assessments completed. 5. Review of Resident #105's medical record, showed: -An admission date of 10/16/16; -A quarterly MDS, completed 8/13/20; -No further MDS assessments completed. 6. Review of Resident #153's medical record, showed:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-20 · tag F0640 — widespreadEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and transmit required Minimum Data Sets (MDS) a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, for 11 (Residents #53, #55, #103, #104, #105, #153, #155, #156, #201, #202 and #203) of 12 sampled residents. The census was 34. 1. Review of Resident #53's medical record, showed: -admitted on [DATE]; -No MDS assessments completed. 2. Review of Resident #55's medical record, showed: -admitted on [DATE]; -No MDS assessments completed. 3. Review of Resident #103's medical record, showed: -admitted on [DATE]; -A quarterly MDS, completed 9/2/20; -No further MDS assessments completed. 4. Review of Resident #104's medical record, showed: -admitted on [DATE]; -A quarterly MDS, completed 9/2/20; -No further MDS assessments completed. 5. Review of Resident #105's medical record, showed: -admitted on [DATE]; -A quarterly MDS, completed 8/13/20; -No further MDS assessments completed. 6. Review of Resident #153's medical record, showed:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-12-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective quality assurance (QA)/quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program when they did not implement appropriate interventions to correct on-going, systemic issues. The sample size was 12. The census was 34. Review of the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy, undated, showed: Intent: -These policies are intended to ensure the facility develops a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI/QAA (Quality Assessment and Assurance) activities, such as identifying and correcting quality deficiencies as well as opportunities for improvement, which will lead to improvement in the lives of nursing home residents, through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety; Policy: -The facility, will develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life; The facility will: 1. Maintain documentation and demonstrate evidence of its…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-20 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the quality assurance and assessment (QAA) committee held quarterly quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) meetings, and/or consisted of the required committee members. The census was 34. Review of the facility QAA Committee policy, undated, showed: Intent: -These policies are intended to ensure the facility develops a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement)/QAA activities, such as identifying and correcting quality deficiencies as well as opportunities for improvement, which will lead to improvement in the lives of nursing home residents, through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety; Policy: -The quality assessment and assurance committee reports to the facility's governing body, or designated person(s) functioning as a governing body regarding its activities, including implementation of the QAPI Program; The committee will: 1. Develop and implement appropriate plans to correct identified quality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures to prevent abuse and neglect by failing to ensure the completion of proper screenings of criminal backgrounds, the employment disqualification list (EDL), and federal indicator checks (to ensure the employee is in good standing with the nurse aide (NA) program) for six of ten employee records reviewed. The census was 34. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Property Prevention policy, undated, showed: -Intent: The facility will develop and operationalize policies and procedures for screening and training employees, protection of residents and for the prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and misappropriation of property. The purpose is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences; -Procedure: Screening: -Screen potential employees for a history of abuse, neglect or mistreating residents. This includes attempting to obtain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Review of Resident #155's medical record, showed: -admitted on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included diabetes, high blood pressure and stroke. Review of the resident's care plan, last updated 10/1/21, showed no information regarding the use of side rails. Observation on 12/14/21 at 9:35 A.M., showed the resident sat on his/her bed. Quarter length side rails were raised on both sides of the bed. Observation on12/15/21 at 9:25 A.M., 12/16/21 at 10:56 A.M. and 2:52 P.M., and 12/17/21 at 6:37 A.M. and 9:44 A.M., showed the resident lay on his/her back in his/her bed. Quarter length side rails were raised on both sides of the bed. 5. During an interview on 12/20/21 at 8:56 A.M., the administrator and Nurse A said care plans should be completed upon admission, quarterly and as needed. The care plan should reflect the resident's needs. Resident #155's care plan should have reflected his/her bed rails, limited communication due to complications associated with a past stroke and refusal of services. 3. Review of Resident #103's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed physician parameter orders for high/low blood glucose levels and/or failed to ensure residents with orders for routine blood glucose levels had physician parameters and failed to ensure one of those four residents with an order for heel protectors wore them (Residents #156, #205, #102 and #56). In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff followed their neurological assessment policy after one resident had a fall with a head injury and failed to ensure that same resident had a pressure ulcer dressing in place prior to transferring the resident from bed into a chair (Resident #201). The census was 34. 1. Review of Resident #156's admission face sheet, showed: -admission date of 3/29/19; -Diagnoses included fracture of the left femur, with routine healing, pressure ulcer of the right hip, changes in skin texture, non-pressure chronic ulcer of unspecified part of unspecified lower leg, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, pain, muscle weakness; Alzheimer's disease and diabetes mellitus.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-20 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a full-time Registered Nurse (RN) as the Director of Nursing (DON), and failed to ensure an RN was scheduled to work 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. The census was 34. Review of the facility-wide assessment, undated, showed: Staffing Plan: DON: 1 DON RN full-time. Review of the Director of Nursing Job Description: Ensuring Nursing Personal to Perform Best Patient Care, undated, showed: -A DON, who is also known as a nursing director, becomes a person whose job is to ensure the nursing personnel works. The DON job description must include managing healthcare facilities and services, ensuring patient care, etc. He/she also works to handle administrative tasks including budgeting. A DON usually makes use of the DON description template as a reminder of his/her tasks. DON Job Description Information: -We are looking for a DON to work in our facility to do the DON job description duties. The candidate must be experienced, qualified, and responsible to create an efficient workplace for the residents' needs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-20 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document the date the facility-wide assessment was developed, if and when it had been reviewed by the QAA (quality assurance and assessment)/QAPI (quality assurance and performance improvement) committee, the date of the last annual review and/or the date of the last revision. The facility-wide assessment did not include the need for a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day 7 days a week, its staffing plan and did not include the most recent information regarding their emergency water sources. In addition, the facility failed to follow their facility-wide assessment which designated an RN to serve as the Director of Nursing (DON), ensuring Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and Certified Medication Technicians (CMTs) received 12 hours of annual in-services, and followed their infection control prevention and control program by ensuring staff and residents received required tuberculosis testing. The census was 34. Review of the Facility Assessment, included the following: -Date(s) of assessment or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 9 of 10 staff hired within the past 12 months received their two-step tuberculin skin test, and failed to ensure 9 of 12 sampled residents and two of two expanded sample residents received their admission two-step tuberculin skin test and or annual tuberculosis (TB) screening/assessment. (Residents #52, #53, #55, #56, #102, #153, #155, #156, #201, #202 and #204). The census was 34. Review of the facility Infection Control-Tuberculosis (TB) Screening Program, undated, showed: Intent: -It is the policy of the facility to ensure the implementation of a Tuberculosis Screening Program in accordance with State and Federal Regulations, and the Centers for Disease Control and Preventions (CDC) guidelines; Procedure: 1. The facility infection control coordinator or designee is responsible for the TB program; 2. The facility will conduct a TB risk assessment annually; 3. The facility staff will be trained on signs, symptoms, and risk factors for TB; 4. The facility will screen all staff upon hire for TB. Staff who test…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-20 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident personal funds were placed in an interest-bearing account for one of one resident account reviewed (Resident #209). The census was 34. Review of the facility's Protection/Management of Personal Funds policy, undated, showed: -It is the policy of the facility to protect and manage the personal funds of the resident in such a manner to acknowledge and respect resident rights; -Residents whose care is funded by Medicaid: -The facility will deposit the residents' personal funds in excess of $50.00 in an interest bearing account that is separate from any of the facility's operating accounts, and that credits all interest earned on resident's funds to that account; -There will be a separate accounting for each resident's share. The facility will maintain personal funds that do not exceed $50.00 in a non-interest bearing account, interest-bearing account, or petty cash fund. During an interview on 12/14/21 at 11:18 A.M., the administrator said the facility holds funds for one resident, Resident #209.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and report allegations of resident abuse to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) as required, within a two-hour time frame, for one resident (Resident #203). The sample was 12. The census was 34. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Property Prevention policy, undated, showed: -Intent: The facility will develop and operationalize policies and procedures for screening and training employees, protection of residents and for the prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and misappropriation of property, to include the use of physical or chemical restraints. The purpose is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences; -Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, pulling, and kicking; -Residents of this facility shall be protected from occurrences of abuse, exploitation, misappropriation of property, mistreatment or neglect;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for three residents who were involved in resident altercations (Residents #201, #202, and #203). The sample was 12. The census was 34. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Property Prevention policy, undated, showed: -Intent: The facility will develop and operationalize policies and procedures for screening and training employees, protection of residents and for the prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and misappropriation of property, to include the use of physical or chemical restraints. The purpose is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences; -Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, pulling, and kicking; -Residents of this facility shall be protected from occurrences of abuse, exploitation, misappropriation of property, mistreatment or neglect; -Prevention: -Identify, correct and intervene in situations in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate a fall and an injury of unknown origin for two of 12 sampled residents (Residents #104 and #101). The census was 34. Review of the facility's undated policy on Reporting Accidents and Incidents, showed the following: -Intent: It is the policy of the facility to report Accidents and Incidents in accordance to State and Federal regulations; Procedure: -1. The Incident and Accident Reporting System will include a comprehensive process which will allow for the following: -a. Collection of the incident and accident occurrence; -b. Investigate incidents and accidents; -c. Evaluate injuries of unknown source; -d. Track and trend incidents and accidents; -2. The Event Report will be completed by the nurse assigned to the resident at the time of the event or a designated nurse; -3. The investigation will be initiated by the Nurse Manager or designee within 72 calendar hours from the event; -4. The Unit Manager or designee will complete the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure scheduled pain medication was available and/or administered as ordered, and to document measures taken by staff to obtain the medication for one resident (Resident #204). The sample was 12. The census was 34. Review of Resident #204's medical record, showed: -Diagnoses included sciatica (symptom of a problem with the sciatic nerve (the largest nerve in the body), causing pain, weakness, numbness or tingling), pain in left shoulder, osteoarthritis and depression; -An order, dated 8/13/20, for tramadol (narcotic) 50 milligram (mg) tablet, give two tabs by mouth every six hours as needed for pain; -An order, dated 9/16/21, for Lidoderm (lidocaine, used to relieve pain) 5% adhesive patch, medicated, every 12 hours, on at 8:00 A.M. and off at 8:00 P.M. for pain. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) for November 2021, showed: -On 11/1/21 through 11/10/21, staff documented Lidoderm not administered, drug/item unavailable; -On 11/11/21 and 11/12/21, staff documented Lidoderm administered; -On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-20 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete required assessments and maintain proper documentation for the use of side rails/bed rails for two of 12 sampled residents (Residents #155 and #156). The facility identified 11 residents who utilized side rails. Of the 11 residents who utilized side rails, two were sampled, and problems were identified with both residents. The census was 34. Review of the facility's undated Bedrails policy and procedure, showed: -Policy: The facility shall provide adequate management of Bedrails to ensure that residents attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. -Procedure: -The facility will attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail; -If a bed or side rail is used, the facility will ensure correct installation, use, and maintenance of bed rails, including but not limited to the following elements; -Assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-20 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an inspection of bed frames, mattresses and side rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for two residents (Residents #155 and #156) of 12 sampled residents to reduce the risk of accidents. The facility identified 11 residents who utilized side rails. Of the 11 residents, two were sampled, and problems were identified with both residents. The census was 34. Review of the facility's undated Bedrails policy and procedure, showed: -Policy: The facility shall provide adequate management of bedrails to ensure that residents attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. -Procedure: -The facility will attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail; -If a bed or side rail is used, the facility will ensure correct installation, use, and maintenance of bed rails, including but not limited to the following elements:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-09-30 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing information daily in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. The census was 38.Observations on 9/25/25 at 10:00 A.M., and 12:02 P.M., showed no staffing information posted in a prominent place.Observations on 9/26/25 at 9:00 A.M., and 11:00 A.M., showed no staffing information posted in a prominent place.During an interview on 9/26/25 at 11:15 A.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said the staffing has not been posted for about a month. It usually was posted in the lobby of the facility. The Activities Director was responsible for posting it but that person no longer works at the facility. The ADON did not know who currently was responsible for posting the staffing hours.During an interview on 9/30/25 at 10:51 A.M., the Administrator said she expected staffing information to be posted daily in a prominent place.
- No harm found · Ccited before2021-12-20 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the most recent abbreviated survey results in a place readily accessible to residents, family members and the public. The facility also failed to post notices in a prominent location of the availability of the reports, and failed to maintain reports from complaint investigations made during the three preceding years for review upon request. The census was 34. Observations on all days of the survey on 12/14/21 through 12/17/21, and 12/20/21, showed: -No postings regarding the availability of the most recent survey results or the prior three years; -In the corner of the front dining room, a survey binder hung in a basket on the wall. Review of the facility survey binder on 12/20/21 at 7:15 A.M., showed the binder contained the last three years of annual survey results, but did not contain the results of any complaint investigations completed July 2020 through December 2021. During an interview on 12/20/21 at 7:20 A.M., the administrator said she began working with the facility on 9/15/21. She is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2021-12-20 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post required nurse staffing information which included the total number of staff and the actual hours worked by both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care, per shift, on a daily basis. The census was 34. Observations of common areas throughout the facility on 12/14, 12/15, 12/16, 12/17 and 12/20 at different times, showed no staffing information posted. During an interview on 12/20/21 at 12:45 P.M., the administrator and nurse A said the staffing information had not been posted as required. Nurse A said he/she was responsible to post the daily staffing hours and had posted the information a few times since he/she started on 9/14/21, but stopped posting it. It has not been posted since the survey began on 12/14/21.
- No harm found · C2021-12-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they maintained an effective system to track influenza and pneumococcal vaccines for 12 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #52, #53, #55, #104, #105, #153, #155, #156, #201, #202, #203, and #204). This affected all residents residing in the facility. The census was 34. Review of the facility's Infection Control-Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations for Residents policy, undated, showed: -Intent: It is the policy of the facility to ensure that the resident receives Influenza and Pneumococcal immunizations, in accordance with State and Federal Regulations, and national guidelines; -Procedure; -Influenza Immunization: 1. Before offering the influenza immunization, each resident and or the resident representative receives education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunization; 2. Each resident is offered an influenza immunization October 1 through March 31 annually, unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized during this time period; 3. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-27 for 19 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in MO
CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 26A490. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.