No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Oak Knoll Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

37 North Clark Avenue, Ferguson, MO 63135 · For profit - Corporation · 79 certified beds · (314) 521-7419 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (314) 521-7419 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2025Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0568)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
199 N Florissant Rd · (314) 449-9640 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
190 N Florissant Rd · (314) 521-4518 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
49 N Florissant Rd · (314) 521-1854 · Call to confirm hours
Park
501 N Florissant Rd · (314) 521-4661 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.2%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.6%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.8%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.4%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury8.0%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.6%17.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.6%25.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.4%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.8%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.8%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table33.3%23.5%17.1%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.142.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.172.331.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.12U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.29
RN hours/ resident / day
0.54
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.21
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.04
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
41.1%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 69.2 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.04 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-05-24)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2022-11-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1). The census 67. Review of the facility's policy on Injuries of Unknown Origin, updated 4/30/20, showed the following: -Investigation should include Who, What, When, Why and How. Enable the investigator to record the information and establish a reasonable cause known source of the incident or injury within 24 hours of the incident or injury. If the investigator is unable to establish a reasonable cause or known source, further investigation is required. -Extended Investigation: Further investigation is required if there is Injury of Unknown Origin or Suspected Abuse within 24 hours and 1 hour for Abuse. The following will be needed: Statements from all involved witnesses and reporters. Expand the time frame surrounding the incident for collecting data and begin timeline. Follow-up on new information. Obtain related professional expertise. If the suspected perpetrator is staff, interview the other residents the staff person…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident was free from physical abuse from a staff member (Resident #1). The sample was six. The census was 68. The Administrator was notified on 5/27/25 at 1:22 P.M., of the past non-compliance, which occurred on 5/18/25. The facility provided in-servicing for all staff regarding the facility's abuse and neglect policy with emphasis on reporting in a timely manner. The deficiency was corrected on 5/20/25. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, dated 5/14/24, showed the following: -Purpose: The facility has a ZERO TOLERANCE policy on any form of abuse or neglect against residents. Each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and neglect. All facility residents will not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to; facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents was free from abuse. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A pulled on Resident #1's hair while taking the resident back to his/her room for hygiene care. The census was 62. The Administrator was notified on 4/3/25, of the past non-compliance. On 3/26/25, the management was notified of an abuse allegation that occurred the evening of 3/25/25. Upon notification of an abuse allegation on 3/26/25, the facility immediately suspended staff, investigated and implemented abuse/neglect in-servicing to all facility staff. During the onsite investigation, interviewed staff verified recent in-servicing and verbalized education. The deficiency was corrected on 3/26/25. Review of the abuse/neglect policy, revised 5/24/23, showed: -Purpose: the facility has a zero tolerance policy on any form of abuse or neglect against residents. Each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, mental abuse and neglect. Residents will not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including staff, other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete, accurate and individualized care plans to address the specific needs of residents for five of 18 sampled residents (Resident #2, #36, #34,#26 and #13). The census was 66. Review of the facility Care Plan Policy, dated 2001, revised [DATE], showed: -An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident; -Our facility's Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team, in coordination with the resident, his/her family or representative (sponsor), develops and maintains a comprehensive care plan for each resident that identifies the highest level of functioning the resident may be expected to attain; -The comprehensive care plan is based on a thorough assessment that includes, but is not limited to, the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff); -Each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bed rails were accurately assessed as a necessary device prior to installation and use for five of 18 sampled residents (Resident #62, #36, #26, #2 and #13). The facility also failed to document usage in the resident's care plan. The census was 66. Review of the facility's Proper Use of Side Rails policy, revised October 2010, showed: -The purpose of these guidelines are to ensure the safe use of side rails as resident mobility aids to and prohibit the use of side rails as restraints unless necessary to treat a resident's medical symptoms; -General Guidelines; -Side rails are only permissible if they are used to treat a resident's medical symptoms or to assist with mobility and transfer of residents; -An assessment will be made to determine the resident's symptoms or reason for using side rails. When used for mobility or transfer, an assessment will include a review of the resident's; -Bed mobility; -Ability to change positions,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week. The facility maintained a census of greater than 60 residents, and this deficiency had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 66. Review of the facility's daily assignment sheets, dated 4/20/24 through 5/20/24, showed no RN was scheduled on 4/22, 4/24, 4/26, 4/29, 5/1, 5/3, 5/6, 5/8, 5/9, 5/15, 5/17, and 5/20. During an interview on 5/21/24 at 9:04 A.M., RN B said he/she worked part-time, every Tuesday, Thursday and some weekends. During an interview on 5/22/24 at 11:45 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said there were three RNs in the facility, including herself. She said RN B worked Tuesdays, Thursdays and every other weekend. The other RN worked every other weekend only. The DON said the facility had an RN daily because she worked whenever the other two RNs were not working. She worked Monday to Friday and weekends if needed. She understood that due to their census, the DON could not be considered as a staff RN.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records for all controlled drugs with sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for one of one controlled substance binders reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents with controlled substance orders. The census was 66. Review of the facility's Controlled Substance Policy, dated December 2011, showed: -Policy Statement: The facility shall comply with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of Schedule II (drugs with a high abuse risk) and other controlled substances (a drug or other substance that is tightly controlled by the government because it may be abused or cause addiction); -The Director of Nursing (DON) services will identify staff members who are authorized to handle controlled drugs; -Controlled substances must be counted upon delivery. The nurse receiving the order, along with the person delivering the medication order, must count the controlled substances together. Both individuals must sign the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in accordance with acceptable professional principles when staff walked away from the medication cart, leaving it unlocked. In addition, staff left the medication room unlocked. The census was 66. Review of the facility's Storage of Medications Policy, dated April 2007, showed: -The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner; -Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others. 1. Observation on 5/21/24 at 7:50 A.M., showed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C passing medications on the 100 hall. The medication cart (med cart) was in front of the bird cage. LPN C prepared a resident's medication and walked away from the med cart to administer the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain food under sanitary conditions by not ensuring food was labeled and dated after opened. This had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the facility kitchen. The census was 66. Review of the Dietary Infection Control/Sanitation Policy, undated, showed: -Food is stored in a safe and sanitary manner; -Food stored in freezers and refrigerators are covered, labeled and dated, especially foods taken out of their original containers and leftovers. Observation of the kitchen on 5/20/24 at 12:12 P.M., 5/23/24 at 1:41 P.M., and on 5/24/24 at 9:00 A.M., showed: -A plastic bag of frozen hamburger, opened and undated; -A plastic bag of frozen pork chops, opened and undated; -A plastic bag of frozen hash browns, opened and undated; -A plastic bag of frozen taco meat, opened and undated; -A plastic bag of frozen buns, opened and undated; -Bowls of mixed fruit, covered with plastic wrap, undated; During an interview on 5/24/24 at 9:13 A.M., the Dietary Manager said she expected staff to label and date food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that in accordance with acceptable professional standards and practices, medical records were complete and accurately documented including the administration of medications and treatments for six residents (Resident #13, #30, #26, #2, #51 and #24). The sample was 18. The census was 66. Review of the facility's Administering Medication Policy, dated April 2010, showed: -Policy statement: medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed; -Only persons licensed or permitted by this state to prepare, administer, and document the administration of medications may do so; -The Director of Nursing (DON) Services will supervise and direct all nursing personnel who administer medications and/or have related functions; -The individual administering the medication must initial the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) on the appropriate line after giving each medication and before administering the next ones;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program when staff failed to wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), in accordance with the facility's policy, during high-contact activities with residents on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, precautions for use during high-contact resident care activities for residents infected with a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO, microorganisms that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents) or any resident who has a chronic wound and/or indwelling medical device) for three residents (Residents #30, #46 and #24). In addition, the facility failed to follow accepted infection control and prevention to implement their water management program to prevent the spread of waterborne pathogens, such as legionella (a bacteria that causes legionnaire's disease which is a severe form of pneumonia or lung inflammation). This failure had the potential to affect all residents in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed routine inspections of bed/side rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for five of 18 sampled residents (Resident #62, #36, #26, #2 and #13). The census was 66. Review of the facility's Proper Use of Side Rails policy, revised October 2010, showed: -The purpose of these guidelines are to ensure the safe use of side rails as resident mobility aids to and prohibit the use of side rails as restraints unless necessary to treat a resident's medical symptoms; -General Guidelines: -Side rails are only permissible if they are used to treat a resident's medical symptoms or to assist with mobility and transfer of residents; -An assessment will be made to determine the resident's symptoms or reason for using side rails. When used for mobility or transfer, an assessment will include a review of the resident's: -Bed mobility; -Ability to change positions, transfer to and from bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' needs were met by failing to ensure 10 residents who needed assistance with meal setup and eating were served and assisted for meals at the same time as the other residents in the dining room that did not require assistance. The ten residents sat and watched others at their table eat while they waited for food. Three of the ten residents were sampled residents (Resident #4, #2, and #3). Resident #4 was the last to be provided a meal and assistance with eating and waited over 30 minutes. The sample size was 4. The census was 70. 1. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/22/23, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Eating: Setup or clean-up assistance. Helper sets up or cleans up. Resident completes activity; -Upper body dressing: Supervision or touching assistance; -Lower body dressing: Supervision or touching assistance;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-11 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed and submitted for processing for four of 17 residents (Resident (R)13, R35, R36 and R137) in the sample. This failure has the potential to adversely affect the care planning and care provision for any resident that may not have received a comprehensive assessment. Findings include: 1. Review of R13's Face Sheet from the electronic medical record (EMR) Resident tab showed an admission date of 11/09/11, readmission of 05/13/22, with medical diagnoses that included schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, mood (affective) disorder, neuropathy, asthma, cataracts, and atrial fibrillation. Review of R13's EMR MDS tab showed quarterly MDS assessment reference date (ARD) 02/15/22 and 05/18/22 with a status of Production Accepted. No quarterly MDS for August was found. In an interview on 11/10/22 at 1:10 PM, the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) confirmed there was a missing assessment, stating, No August quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-11 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident (R) 28) received quarterly personal fund statements. Specifically, R28 was cognitively impaired and R28's Resident Representative (RR) did not receive quarterly personal fund statements for January through September 2022. Findings include: Review of R28's undated Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the resident tab revealed R28 was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis of dementia. Review of R28's annual Minimal Data Set (MDS), located in the EMR under the RAI tab, revealed R28 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero out of 15, which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. During an interview on 11/08/22 at 4:04 PM, R28's RR stated the facility managed R28's personal funds account. R28's RR stated that he/she did not receive quarterly statements for R28's personal funds account. Review of R28's Personal Funds Ledger Card dated January through September…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the power of attorney (POA) or Hospice when a resident had a fall and was transferred to the hospital for one of one resident (Resident (R) 21) reviewed in a total sample of 17 residents. Findings include: Review of R21's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/03/22 found in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Resident assessment tab revealed that R21 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 of 15 which indicated resident was cognitively intact during the time of the accident. Review of R21's Progress note under the Progress notes tab showed that R21 was placed on hospice care on 09/21/22 by sister who was the POA. Review of the Advance Directive document confirmed the sister was the POA. Review of progress notes dated 10/03/22 found in the EMR under the Progress notes tab showed that no follow-up was made to the POA after R21 had fallen and hit her head. Review of the Progress note dated 10/03/22 at 04:39AM revealed, .due to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-11 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three residents (Resident (R)32, R37, R38) or Resident Representative (RR) were issued a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) related to the end of Medicare A Skilled Services. This failure left the Residents and/or Resident Representatives uninformed of the possibility of continuing services and the expense that might be incurred. Findings include: 1. Review of R32's Face Sheet from the electronic medical record (EMR) Resident tab showed an admission date of 02/28/22, readmit date of 08/12/22 with medical diagnoses of congestive heart failure, hypertension, permanent atrial fibrillation, lymphedema, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Medicare A Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage [NOMNC] document showed R38 started PT/OT/ST [physical/occupational/speech therapies] on 02/28/22 and was discontinued on 03/30/22. No SNFABN notice was provided to R32 or his/her Resident Representative. 2. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-11 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and admission packet review, the facility failed to ensure two of three residents (Resident (R)34, and R135) and/or their representatives reviewed for an emergent discharge to the hospital, out of a total sample of 17, were provided with a written notice of transfer that included all required information. The facility 's transfer notice forms did not include information on how to contact the Ombudsman or how to file an appeal, if desired. In addition, although transfer forms prepared by the facility may have been faxed to the hospital where the resident was being transferred, the facility failed to assure that both the resident and their representative received the forms. This failure has the potential to affect the resident and/or their Resident Representative (RR) by not having the knowledge of where and why a resident was transferred, and/or how to appeal the transfer, if desired. Findings include: 1. Review of R135's Face Sheet from the electronic medical record (EMR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-11 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure three of three (Resident (R) 135, 21, and R34) reviewed for hospitalization, the resident and/or their Resident Representative (RR) received a written bed hold notice upon emergent transfer to the hospital. This failure had the potential to contribute to possible denial of re-admission following a hospitalization for residents transferred emergently to the hospital. Findings include: 1 Review of R135's Face Sheet from the electronic medical record (EMR) Resident tab showed a facility admission date of 05/24/13, a readmission date of 10/08/22 During an interview on 11/09/22 at 10:54 AM, R135 stated he/she had gone to the hospital last month after a fall because nobody could pick her up, so they called the ambulance. Review of R135's Progress Notes from the EMR Resident tab revealed: 10/06/22 7:43 AM Nursing Resident was observed laying on floor 2 [at] bedside, movements slowed, speech slowed, vs [vital signs] .resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-11 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed and submitted for processing for three of 17 residents (Resident (R)35, R36 and R137) in the sample. This failure has the potential to adversely affect the care planning and care provision for any resident that may not have received a comprehensive assessment. Findings include: 1. Review of R35's Face Sheet from the electronic medical record (EMR) Resident tab showed an admission date of 12/31/19 with medical diagnoses that included schizophrenia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, and hyperlipidemia. Review of R35's EMR MDS tab on 11/08/22 at 2:01 PM showed an annual MDS assessment reference date of 01/08/22 as an In Process status, with a quarterly MDS ARD 04/10/22 as accepted. During an interview on 11/10/22 at 1:17 PM, the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) stated the annual MDS should have been sent. 2. Review of R36's Face Sheet from the EMR Resident tab showed an admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident (R) 33) was accurate. R33's MDS was not accurately coded to indicate the resident had experienced a significant weight loss. The failure to accurately code/assess the resident's condition has the potential to affect the care planning for the resident to receive all required services. Findings include: Review of R33's Face Sheet from the electronic medical record (EMR) Resident tab, Face Sheet subtab; showed an admission date of 02/14/22 and readmitted on [DATE]; with medical diagnoses that included hyperlipidemia, expressive language disorder, obstructive sleep apnea, depression, and urge incontinence. Review of R33's Resident tab, Vitals subtab, showed the following weights: 03/30/22 185.6 04/29/22 184.8 07/04/22 146.7 On 03/30/22, the resident weighed 185.6 lbs. On 07/04/22, the resident weighed 146.7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-11 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and review of Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) website, the facility failed to ensure one of four residents (Resident (R)6) admitted with a mental health diagnosis had a Level I PASARR for possible referral for a Level II screening to enable receipt of potential services. This failure increases the risk of residents with a mental health diagnosis not receiving specialized services. Findings include: Review of R6's Face Sheet from the electronic medical record (EMR) Resident tab showed an admission date of 01/02/04 with medical diagnoses that included schizophrenia, psychosis, and major depressive disorder. Further review on 11/09/22 at 1:13 PM of R6's EMR, Resident tab, sub-tab Resident Documents did not show any PASARR screenings. During an interview on 11/11/22 at 3:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) showed emails from 2019 where attempts were made to obtain a copy of any PASARR for R6 from 2019. The DON stated, I'm going to have to do a new one. It didn't dawn on me it hadn't been done, just that we didn't have it. I didn't…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was updated for two of 17 residents (Resident (R) 33 and R135) reviewed. The failure to keep a care plan current could affect the appropriateness of care provided. Findings include: 1. Review of R33's Face Sheet from the electronic medical record (EMR) Resident tab, Face Sheet subtab; showed an admission date of 02/14/22 and readmitted on [DATE]; with medical diagnoses that included hyperlipidemia, expressive language disorder, obstructive sleep apnea, depression, and urge incontinence. During an interview on 11/09/22 at 12:47 PM R33's family member stated R33 has dentures, but staff may not put them in for her though. Review of R33's Progress Notes from the EMR Resident tab admission notes and nursing notes did not show any mention of dentures. Review of R33's Care Plan from the EMR MDS tab showed a problem start date of 03/01/22 that stated [R33's name] requires some ADLs [activities of daily living]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate a fall incident for one of 17 residents (Resident (R) 135). The failure to identify a cause of the fall could result in a lack of effective interventions put into place and could result in additional falls and/or injuries. Findings include: Review of R135's Face Sheet from the electronic medical record (EMR) Resident tab showed a facility admission date of 05/24/13, a readmission date of 10/08/22, with medical diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, seizures, paranoid schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, hypertension, vitamin D deficiency, generalized osteoarthritis, nicotine dependence, bilateral post traumatic osteoarthritis of knee, spondylosis, low back pain, and other hypertrophic osteoarthritis of multiple sites. During an interview on 11/09/22 at 10:55 AM, R135 stated she had gone to the hospital last month after a fall because nobody could pick her up, so they called the ambulance. Review of R135's Progress Notes from the EMR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor for behaviors and the effectiveness of the antidepressant medications for two of five residents (R) 19 and R30) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. Review of the Face sheet under the resident tab showed that R19 had an admission date of 12/21/17. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/13/22 under the resident assessment tab in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) showed that R 19 has an active diagnosis of depression. Review of the care plan in the EMR under the resident assessment tab showed that R19 had a care plan dated 12/21/21 for psychotropic drugs which indicateR19 is at risk for adverse consequences R/T [related to]receiving antidepressant medication (Amitriptyline) for treatment of depression and that approved approach was Assess/record effectiveness of drug treatment. Monitor and report signs of sedation, anticholinergic and/or extrapyramidal symptoms. Review of the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) showed that no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure antipsychotic medication was monitored for efficacy and side effects for one of five residents (Resident (R) 5) reviewed for unnecessary medications. R5 received Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication). The facility did not monitor R5 for possible side effects of the medication or response to the medication. Findings include: Review the Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Resident tab revealed R5 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and bipolar disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/12/22, located in the EMR under the RAI tab, revealed R5 had a BIMS score of 2 out of 15 which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Physician Orders dated 10/03/22, located under the Resident tab in the EMR, indicated R5 received Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) 25 milligram (mg) three times daily. Review of R5's care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff had access to, and were inserviced on, the facility's most recent abuse and neglect policies and procedures. In addition, the facility failed to ensure residents, family and/or guardians received copies of the facility's most recent abuse and neglect policies. The census was 67. Review of the facility's undated Resident Rights policy, given to all new residents in the resident handbook upon admission, showed: Definitions: -Abuse includes, but is not limited to, the willful infliction of physical, verbal, sexual, or mental anguish, or the willful deprivation by a caregiver or services necessary to maintain physical or mental health; -Neglect refers to the withholding of services from any person unable to provide for self the necessary services to maintain physical or mental health; -Exploitation refers to the act or process of taking advantage of any person by another person or caregiver for monetary, personal or other benefit for profit; -If you witness and incident; what do you do?: -Anyone who witnesses an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-24 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving one on one activities received those activities consistently. The facility identified seven residents as receiving one on one activities and problems were found with all seven (Residents #1, #4, #5, #10, #22, #39 and #54). The census was 67. 1. Review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/14/19, showed: -Rarely/never understood; -Activity preference: Blank. Review of the resident's one on one activity log, dated 8/2019, showed the resident received one on one activities six times. Review of the resident's quarterly assessment, dated 8/12/19 at 12:46 P.M., showed the resident is on the one on one list for 2 visits a week. Resident is quiet and when he/she does speak, words are confused and sentences do not make sense nor apply to the conversation trying to be held. Resident enjoys coffee and music. Resident will spend time in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to put interventions in place after two sampled residents incurred injuries; one being an abrasion to the head and the other a bruise to the thigh (Residents #1 and #9). Staff also left a set of keys with pepper spray unattended on the cooler in the kitchen for two of two days of observation. The census was 67. Review of the facility's undated Incident Investigation Procedure, showed: -In the event of any incident the following procedures must be implemented immediately: -Assess the person; -Provide medical attention as needed; -Contact the physician, inform, and receive order(s); -Contact the family or responsible party; -When an incident occurs, Charge Nurse must complete the Phase I investigation process by completing the Data Collection and Incident Report; -Phase I: -Complete Data Collection form; -Interview alleged resident victim; -Interview witnesses; -Review resident victim medical record; -Review resident victim's normal interaction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-24 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure alternatives were attempted prior to the installation of side/bed rails and failed to thoroughly assess residents for risks of entrapment. Two of the 25 residents sampled had side/bedrails, neither had orders for side/bed rails, but utilized them. Problems were found with both (Residents #1 and #9). The census was 67. 1. Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 5/7/19, showed: -Diagnosis of dementia; -Short/long term memory loss; -Required extensive staff assistance for bed mobility, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene; -Required total staff assistance for transfers; -Incontinent of bowel and bladder; -No falls; -No side/bedrail use. Review of the resident's care plan, updated 8/7/19, showed no documentation regarding side/bedrails. Review of the resident's progress notes, dated 9/7/2019 at 5:37 A.M., showed: -Certified nurse aide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-11-11 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure the required nursing staff posting accurately reflected the staff numbers and hours to care for the 56 current residents. This failure had the potential to inaccurately inform any resident, family member, or visitor to the facility of the available nursing staff caring for them, their loved one, or their friend. Findings include: Observations of the entrance area on 11/08/22 at 9:00 AM showed no nursing staff posting; at 11:20 AM of the nurse's station, dining room, and elevator area showed no staff posting; on 11/09/22 at 8:45 AM of the entrance, and 12:01 PM of the nurse's station, dining room, and elevator area showed no staff posting and on 11/20/22 at 7:45 AM of the reception area showed nothing posted. During an interview on 11/10/22 at 9:50 AM regarding the nursing staff posting, the Receptionist looked in the drawer, was unable to find anything and stated she didn't know. In an interview regarding the location of the nurse staff posting on 11/10/22 at 9:57 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-09-24 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable accounting principles when the cash at the facility in the resident trust account at the end of the month exceeded the $50.00 allowable for cash on hand per medicaid resident. The census was 67. Review of the resident trust account on 9/24/19, showed: -The resident balance ledgers for January 2019, showed an ending balance of $18709.29. The cash on hand at the end of the month was $7580.40. The facility held funds for 51 residents which only allowed $2,550 cash on hand for petty cash; -The resident balance ledgers for February 2019, showed an ending balance of $19399.55. The cash on hand at the end of the month was $6909.40. The facility held funds for 51 residents which only allowed $2,550 cash on hand for petty cash; -The resident balance ledgers for March 2019, showed an ending balance of $18697.81. The cash on hand at the end of the month was $5873.43. The facility held funds for 52 residents which only allowed $2,600 cash on hand for petty cash; -The resident balance ledgers for April 2019, showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-09-24 · tag F0576 — widespread
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received their mail on Saturdays. During the resident council meeting, nine of nine residents said they do not receive Saturday's mail until Monday. The census was 67. During the resident council meeting on 9/20/19 at 10:00 A.M., nine of nine residents attending said they do not receive their Saturday mail until Monday. They did not know why the mail was not delivered on Saturdays. During an interview on 9/20/19 at 11:40 A.M., the administrator said the mail carrier does not deliver the mail to the facility on Saturdays because they deliver the mail at different times and there might not always be someone at the facility to accept the mail. Normally, there is a receptionist on duty, from 7:00 A.M. until 8:00 P.M., on Saturdays that could accept the mail or a nurse could accept the mail.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BRENCICK, JOHNIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 06/01/2009
NORRIS, THOMASIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 06/01/2009
MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING INCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2009

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$720K
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 98%Medicare 0%Other / private 1%

About 98% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $720K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$192per resident / day
operating cost
$5,834per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$204per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265680. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-05-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next