Kingdom Care Senior Living

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 85.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 36 beds and averages 27.4 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.549 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to store and serve food at temperatures adequate to prevent food-borne illness and in a manner to prevent contamination and outdated use. Facility staff also failed to allow mechanically washed dishes to air-dry prior to stacking in storage and use to prevent the growth of food-borne pathogens. These failures have the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 27.1. Review of the facility's policy titled Record of Food Temperatures, undated, showed it is the policy of the facility to record food temperatures to ensure food is at the proper serving temperatures. Review showed potentially hazardous cold food temperatures will be kept at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit (dF). Review showed the policy directed staff to measure and record temperatures for each food product and milk at all meals. Observation on 04/13/26 at 10:51 A.M., showed an unidentified Dietary Aide (DA) prepared the salad bar for the lunch meal. Observation showed the DA placed multiple food items in bowls which were placed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to document a thorough facility-wide assessment to include specific staffing needs for each resident unit in the facility and consider specific staffing needs for each shift, such as day, evening, night or include active involvement in the process from direct care staff, including but not limited to: Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), Nurse Aides (NA), and representatives of the direct care staff, if applicable, and/or solicit and consider input received from residents, resident representatives, and family members. The facility census was 27.1. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment policy, dated October 2018, showed the residents, representatives and family members may be asked to participate in the review of the care and services provided to meet the needs of our residents. The policy did not contain documentation or assessment of staffing needs of each unit or shift. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 04/01/26, showed the workforce profile includes the following direct care staff type of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for four (Resident #1, # 9, #17, and #23) of twelve sampled residents. The facility census was 27.1. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plan policy, dated March 2022, showed: -The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment;-The comprehensive, person-centered care plan:-Includes measurable objectives and timeframes;-Describes services to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being;-Includes resident stated goals and outcomes;-Builds on resident strengths;-Reflects current recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions. 2. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 04/15/26, showed staff assessed the resident as cognitively intact. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for five residents (Resident #2, #8, #13, #19, and #23) out of twelve sampled resident care plans. The facility census was 27.1. Review of the facility's Comprehensive, Care Plan policy, dated March 2022, showed: -The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment; -The comprehensive, person-centered care plan: -Includes measurable objectives and timeframes; -Describes services to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being; -Includes resident stated goals and outcomes; -Builds on resident strengths; -Reflects current recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions. -Assessments are on-going and care plans are revised as information about the resident condition changes; -The Interdisciplinary team (IDT) revise and updates the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards, when staff failed to lock medication carts when unattended and not in use and store chemicals when not in use. The facility census was 27.1. Review of the facility's Medication Storage policy, dated 2026, showed: -All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments (i.e., medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, medication rooms) under proper temperature controls;-Only authorized personnel will have access to the keys to locked compartments;-During a medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart. 2.Observation on 04/12/26 at 9:15 A.M., showed one unlocked and unattended treatment cart and one unlocked unattended medication cart at the nurse's station. Observation showed residents and staff walked by carts. Observation on 04/12/26 at 7:38 A.M., showed an unlocked treatment cart at the nurse station. Registered Nurse (RN) C had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-15 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to educate and offer Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a respiratory disease that can cause severe illness, immunizations to residents as required for four residents (Residents #8, #13, #15, and #25) of five sampled residents. The facility census was 27.1. Review of the facility's policy COVID-19 Vaccination dated 2025, showed the facility will educate and offer the COVID-19 vaccine to residents, resident representatives and staff and maintain documentation of each. A copy of the Vaccine Information Statement will be given to staff, residents and resident representatives prior to administration. Review of Resident #8's medical record showed the record did not contain documentation of education, administration or refusal of the COVID-19 vaccination for the 2025-2026 season. Review of Resident #13's medical record showed the record did not contain documentation of education, administration or refusal of the COVID-19 vaccination for the 2025-2026 season.Review of Resident #15's medical record showed the record did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to perform a significant change in status (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, a federally mandated assessment tool, for two (Resident #8 and #23) of three residents who elected hospice services and one (Resident #19) of four sampled residents who had a change in activities of daily living. The facility census was 27.1. Review of the facility's MDS 3.0 Completion policy, dated 2025, showed:-The facility conducts periodic comprehensive, accurate, and standardized assessment of each resident's functional capacity using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual specified by the state;-A SCSA is a comprehensive assessment completed within 14 days of the identification of a status change that meets the requirements outlined in Chapter Two of the RAI manual;-A SCSA is a major decline or improvement in a resident's status that will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to obtain orders for an indwelling urinary catheter and catheter care for one resident (Resident #2) out of one sampled resident, failed to obtain an order for hospice for one (Resident #23) out of three sampled residents, and failed to notify the physician when one (Resident #17) of four sampled residents did not receive his/her medication as ordered. The facility census was 27.1. Review of the facility's Indwelling Catheter Care policy, undated, showed ff an indwelling catheter is in use, the facility will provide appropriate care for the catheter in accordance with current professional standards of practice and resident care policies and procedures that include but are not limited to insertion, ongoing care and catheter removal protocols that adhere to professional standards of professional and infection prevention and control procedures. 2. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0840 — isolated
  Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and record review, facility staff failed to ensure arrangements were made for nephrology (services that provide care for kidney related conditions) services outside of the facility for one resident (Resident #35) of one sampled resident with kidney disease. The facility census was 27.1. Review of the facility's admission Agreement, undated, showed if a resident chose a physician who does not have privileges at the facility, the resident must travel, at their own expense, to the healthcare provider to receive services from that provider. The agreement did not contain direction or guidance on assistance to set up transportation for ordered services or assistance in set up for the appointments. Review of Resident #35's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 01/01/26, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Cognitively intact;-Always incontinent of bladder;-Diagnosis of impaired kidney function. Review of the resident's nurse's notes, dated 01/01/26 through 03/31/26, showed staff documented: -02/08/26: Order received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-06 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to conduct and document an annual facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for facility residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies as required. The facility census was 26. 1. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment Report, dated July 2024, showed the assessment did not contain information on staffing for day-to-day operations and emergencies as required. During an interview on 1/6/25 at 10:02 A.M., Licensed practical Nuse (LPN) A said he/she is responsible for the nursing staff schedule. He/She said he/she schedules a consistent schedule based on the census and not according to resident acuity. He/She said he/she does not know what the facility assessment directs for staffing. During an interview on 1/6/25 at 11:01 A.M., the corporate director of finance said the previous administrator left abruptly and he/she at the facility to help until a new administrator is hired. He/She said the July 2024 is the only facility assessment the facility has and he/she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO