No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Beloved Health And Rehabilitation Center

328 Munger Lane, Hannibal, MO 63401 · For profit - Individual · 111 certified beds · (573) 577-2100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0565, F0567, F0568, F0569, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$279,380 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Nov 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0568, F0569, F0570)
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (133) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $279,380 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-04)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3650 Stardust Dr · (573) 406-0375 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3650 Stardust Dr · (573) 406-0682 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
285 Munger Ln
Park
2000 Harrison Hill Rd · (573) 221-0154 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.0%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.5%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.3%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.5%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.3%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication35.1%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.4%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.7%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.9%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table30.7%23.5%17.1%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.092.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.952.331.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.11U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.02hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.3%CMS range 27.2–58.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 7.5–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization14.2%CMS range 8.5–19.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.43
RN hours/ resident / day
0.79
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.57
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.79
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 111 beds and averages 60.2 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 51 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.79 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.57 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.91 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

49
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-11-27)
34
at the previous standard inspection (2022-12-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

133 citations, most serious first. The 25 most serious are shown; the remaining 108 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1), who was identified as at risk for elopement, in a review of six sampled residents, did not leave the facility without staff knowledge. Staff failed to ensure an interior, alarmed, coded double door, as well as the front entrance door alarms were activated and secured on 3/27/25. The resident exited the facility through the interior, alarmed, coded double doors, leading from the dining room to the facility front entrance and exited through the front entrance door without the alarm sounding and without staff knowledge. He/She walked one mile to a convenience store across four lanes of traffic and fell by the roadway. A passing car assisted the resident and called the police who returned the resident to the facility. Facility staff failed to complete face checks every two hours and the resident was out of the facility for four hours before staff identified the resident was missing. The facility census was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Refer to Event ID C0JV13 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care per policy or in accordance with professional standards of practice to six insulin dependent diabetic residents of 29 sampled residents, (Resident #1, #11, #6, #17, #14, and #16). The facility failed to notify Resident #1's physician when the resident experienced hypoglycemic (low blood sugar) and hyperglycemic (high blood sugar) blood glucose readings and was documented as refusing blood glucose tests and insulin. Staff failed to obtain parameters for when to notify the physician of hypoglycemic blood glucose readings. The resident's blood glucose readings ranged from 30 to 537 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl) (normal range 80-120 mg/dl). Staff administered injectable Glucagon (medication to treat very low blood glucose) three times when the resident was assessed as lethargic and difficult to arouse and did not notify the physician twice. The facility administered oral Glucagon without a physician's order and did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for two residents (Resident #5 and #7) in a review of 12 sampled residents. Staff failed to monitor Resident #5 who was left outside from approximately 10:00 A.M. to 12:00 P.M. The resident sat in a wheelchair in the facility courtyard in direct sunlight with temperatures of 87 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and a 91 degree F heat index. The resident was assessed to have altered mental status, was difficult to arouse, and had low oxygen saturation. The resident was sent to the hospital where he/she was admitted with diagnoses of encephalopathy (chemical imbalance in the blood caused by illness) and possible heat stroke (severe heat-related illness that occurs when the body can not regulate its temperature). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a smoking apron was worn for resident safety, per Resident #7's smoking assessment. The facility census was 103. The administrator was notified on 6/14/24 at 1:15 P.M of the Immediate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care per policy or in accordance with professional standards of practice to six insulin dependent diabetic residents of 29 sampled residents, (Resident #1, #11, #6, #17, #14, and #16). The facility failed to notify Resident #1's physician when the resident experienced hypoglycemic (low blood sugar) and hyperglycemic (high blood sugar) blood glucose readings and was documented as refusing blood glucose tests and insulin. Staff failed to obtain parameters for when to notify the physician of hypoglycemic blood glucose readings. The resident's blood glucose readings ranged from 30 to 537 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl) (normal range 80-120 mg/dl). Staff administered injectable Glucagon (medication to treat very low blood glucose) three times when the resident was assessed as lethargic and difficult to arouse and did not notify the physician twice. The facility administered oral Glucagon without a physician's order and did not monitor the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place to prevent injuries/accidents for four residents (Residents #6, #7, and #20). Resident #6 had a history of self harm and swallowing batteries. The facility failed to ensure the resident did not have accessibility to batteries. The resident swallowing four triple A batteries and required treatment at the hospital. The facility also failed to ensure staff transported Resident #7, #15 and #20 in their wheelchairs with foot rests, failed to ensure two residents (Residents #243 and #250) did not smoke near hazardous items, and failed to ensure chemicals were kept secured and not accessible to residents. The facility census was 87. During an interview on 11/25/24 at 2:46 P.M. the Administrator said the facility did not have a policy for protective oversight/preventing accidents/hazards, safety when propelling wheelchairs, safety when transporting residents in the facility van or storage of toxics. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-11-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently assess pain, document why pain medications were not administered when pain was identified, failed to medicate prior to treatment, failed to develop a care plan to implement appropriate pain interventions during and prior to care that elicited pain, and failed to address a sling causing pain for three residents (Resident #19, #36, and #80) in a review of 20 sampled residents, when the residents displayed signs of pain and some were not able to verbalize pain. Resident #19 had fractures and swelling of his/her right extremity, and the resident's sling was placed incorrectly. The resident verbalized distress with his/her limited speech and staff failed to use ordered interventions to assist the resident who showed facial grimacing, guarding, and expressed his/her arm hurt. Resident #80 grimaced, moaned, and guarded limbs with extreme contractures during care and staff failed to identify pain and administer medications ordered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely transfer one resident (Resident #14), who had a diagnosis of right dominant hemiparesis (weakness or paralysis of one side of the body), in a review of 17 sampled residents. Facility staff failed to utilize a gait belt appropriately and grabbed the resident under the arms which resulted in a displaced right proximal humeral fracture (a break in the upper arm bone where the bone fragments have shifted out of position). The facility census was 98. On 9/10/24 at 12:02 P.M., the administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 8/9/24. Upon discovery of the injury, the facility completed an investigation, notified appropriate parties, and interviewed staff. The facility staff were educated on the facility policy on transfers and mechanical lifts. Staff were also required to complete return demonstration of transfers. The deficiency was corrected on 8/22/24. Review of the facility policy, Transfers and Lifts, dated 11/30/22, showed the following: -The facility will ensure that all staff members are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Refer to Event ID C0JV13 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure eight residents, in a review of 29 sampled residents, were treated in a manner to maintain dignity and respect when they failed to communicate with four residents (Residents #2, #7, #9, #10, and #6) in a respectful manner, and provide one resident (Resident #5), who was incontinent, with incontinence briefs when in bed. The resident reported staff told him/her to urinate in his/her bed and they would clean the resident up later. The facility also failed to provide adequate hygiene for one resident (Resident #3) to ensure removal of unwanted facial and underarm hair prior to the resident going out to a physician's appointment. The resident was observed crying and said she was sad and embarrassed by her appearance and that other residents made fun of her. The facility census was 102. Review of the facility policy, Privacy/Room Courtesy Policy, dated 12/28/23, showed the following: -Employees will be cognizant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Refer to Event ID C0JV13 This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, see the Statement of Deficiencies dated 05/29/24. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary and orderly environment in resident rooms. The facility census was 102. Review of the facility policy Synergy Cleaning dated 8/1/24 showed the following: -The purpose is to provide a safe and clean environment for residents; -Clean horizontal services, including window sills; -Spot check floors, clean any spills or trouble areas and pick up any trash. Identify any odors and attend to them immediately; -Sweep floors, move furniture and beds away from walls; -Wet mop floors, move furniture and beds away from walls. During an interview on 7/24/24 at 11:25 A.M. Resident #4 said his/her sheets were not changed on shower days and he/she would have to ask staff several times to get them changed. During an interview on 7/24/24 at 11:28 A.M., Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Refer to Event ID C0JV13 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two female residents (Residents #4 and #3) received the necessary services to maintain grooming and hygiene including bathing, removal of facial and underarm hair, and nail care. The failure caused one resident to be tearful and expressed being sad and embarrassed, stating other residents made fun her. This deficient practice impacted two residents (Residents #4 and #3) in a review 29 sampled residents. The facility census was 102. Review of the facility policy Personal Care, Hygiene and Grooming, dated 11/1/22, showed the most important aspect of maintaining good health was good hygiene. Personal hygiene, also referred to as a personal care, included bathing and showering, hair care, nail care, oral hygiene and dental care and shaving; -Residents are bathed according to preferences, including the time of day, and day of the week, bed bath, tub bath, or shower or partial bath; -Nail care includes keeping…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-06-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, staff failed to ensure four Residents (Resident #4, #9, #10, and #11) were free from verbal abuse when one resident (Resident #8) yelled and cursed at these residents on multiple occasions and staff told the residents to go to their rooms and ignore Resident #8 which caused the residents increased anxiety and fear they would have increased behaviors if Resident #8 continued to yell and curse at them. Resident #4 said he/she was concerned he/she was going to act out towards the resident. Resident #8 caused an increase in his/her anxiety, he/she was having difficulties calming down, and wanting to harm the other resident; Resident #10 said Resident #8 made him/her upset and angry and if something wasn't done to address the resident's behaviors he/she was going to end up in a fight with Resident #8. Resident #9 said he/she was worried about acting out or being aggressive towards the resident because it upset him/her so much. Resident #11 said he/she was always on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, see the Statement of Deficiencies dated 06/18/24. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure eight residents, in a review of 29 sampled residents, were treated in a manner to maintain dignity and respect when they failed to communicate with four residents (Residents #2, #7, #9, #10, and #6) in a respectful manner, and provide one resident (Resident #5), who was incontinent, with incontinence briefs when in bed. The resident reported staff told him/her to urinate in his/her bed and they would clean the resident up later. The facility also failed to provide adequate hygiene for one resident (Resident #3) to ensure removal of unwanted facial and underarm hair prior to the resident going out to a physician's appointment. The resident was observed crying and said she was sad and embarrassed by her appearance and that other residents made fun of her. The facility census was 102. Review of the facility policy, Privacy/Room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three sampled residents (Resident #6, #7 and #8) in a review of seven sampled residents and two additional residents (Resident #9 and #10), received care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure Residents #6, #7, and #8 received their ordered morning medications on time, failed to report abnormal blood pressures for Resident #9 and #10 to a nurse and failed to secure medication cards (with medication in them) before leaving a medication cart unattended in the hallway. The facility census was 91. Review of the facility Medication Administration Policy, dated 11/30/22, showed the following: -The facility will provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing. and administering of all medications, to meet the needs of each resident; -When getting the medication out of the resident's drawer, check to make sure it is the: a. Right resident b. Right medication c. Right dose d. Right time e.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two female residents (Residents #4 and #3) received the necessary services to maintain grooming and hygiene including bathing, removal of facial and underarm hair, and nail care. The failure caused one resident to be tearful and expressed being sad and embarrassed, stating other residents made fun her. This deficient practice impacted two residents (Residents #4 and #3) in a review 29 sampled residents. The facility census was 102. Review of the facility policy Personal Care, Hygiene and Grooming, dated 11/1/22, showed the most important aspect of maintaining good health was good hygiene. Personal hygiene, also referred to as a personal care, included bathing and showering, hair care, nail care, oral hygiene and dental care and shaving; -Residents are bathed according to preferences, including the time of day, and day of the week, bed bath, tub bath, or shower or partial bath; -Nail care includes keeping nails trimmed and filed, no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-03-28 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Resident #7, and #8), of 15 sampled residents with mental disorders received individualized treatment and services to meet their needs. Resident #7 had verbal and physical behaviors towards others. The resident also displayed suicidal ideation and attempted suicide when he/she tied a cord around his/her neck with intent to hang himself/herself and end his/her life. Resident #8 who had a history of suicide attempts, told his/her guardian he/she wanted to hang himself/herself while at the facility, and was sent out for a mental health evaluation. The facility failed to adequately develop and implement meaningful interventions, including non-pharmacological interventions, alternate strategies, or to ensure the residents received timely and appropriate treatment or services, including counseling to address the residents' psychosocial well-being. The facility census was 98. Review of the facility policy, Behavioral Health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-05 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Refer to 4RZT12. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff offered suitable, nourishing evening snacks for three residents (Resident #10, #21, and #22), in a review of 23 sampled residents, who wished to have a snack offered. The facility census was 83.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Refer to 4RZT12. This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, see the Statement of Deficiencies dated 11/27/24. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide for a safe transfer for two residents (Resident #5 and Resident #12) in a review of 23 sampled residents. Facility staff failed to use a gait belt for the transfer of Resident #5 from his/her wheelchair to his/her bed, which resulted in a near-fall, and facility staff failed to use the appropriate size of a mechanical lift pad, based on resident weight, for the transfer of Resident #12 by a mechanical lift, causing the resident to complain of the sling hurting him/her during the transfer process. The facility census was 83.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-27 · tag F0570 — widespread
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a surety bond sufficient to ensure the protection of resident funds. The facility census was 87. Review of the facility maintained Resident Trust Bank Statements for the period 11/2023 through 10/2024, excluding 03/2024, showed an average monthly balance of $5,470.41. Review of the facility maintained Accounts Receivable (A/R) Aging Report, dated 11/19/24, showed the facility held a balance of resident funds in the amount of $29,602.51. Review on 12/19/24 of the Department of Health and Senior Services approved bond list showed the facility had a $50,000 approved bond, making the bond insufficient by $2,500.00. During an interview on 11/25/24, at 5:40 P.M., Business Office Manager (BOM) #2 said she did not know the A/R amounts would increase the amount of the bond needed. She was new to this role and did not know about how all of it worked.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-27 · tag F0572 — widespread
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rights were posted on the 100 hall. Residents on the 100 Hall resided on a locked, secured unit. The facility also failed to ensure resident rights were reviewed with residents at least annually. The facility census was 87. Review of the facility's undated policy, admission Contract and Authorization for Treatment, showed the following: -The following is a statement of resident's rights under federal and state regulations; -The facility must inform the resident both orally and in writing in a language that the resident understands of his or her rights and all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibility during the stay in the facility; -Each resident admitted to the facility, or his/her guardian or legally qualified representative, shall be fully informed of his/her rights and responsibilities as a resident and of all facility rules governing resident conduct and responsibilities. These rights shall be reviewed annually with each resident, guardian, or legally qualified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review the Nurse Aide Registry for a Federal Indicator (which would disqualify an individual from working in the facility) for nine of ten newly hired employees reviewed. The facility census was 87. Review of the facility's policy, Abuse and Neglect, dated 12/28/23, showed the facility would not employ individuals who have been convicted of abusing, neglecting or mistreating individuals. Potential employees are screened for a history of abuse, neglect or mistreating a resident. 1. Review of the Maintenance Director's employee file showed the following: -Date of hire 01/05/24; -No documentation the facility completed a Nurse Aide Registry check. 2. Review of Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) K's employee file showed the following: -Date of hire 10/23/24; -No documentation the facility completed a Nurse Aide Registry check. 3. Review of Certified Medication Technician (CMT) L's employee file showed the following: -Date of hire 11/6/24; -No documentation the facility completed a Nurse Aide Registry check. 4. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-27 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — widespread
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four nurse aides (NA) (NA U, NA Q, NA V and NA W) completed a nurse aide training program within four months of their employment as an NA in the facility. The facility also failed to ensure 16 hours of instructional training covering communication, infection control, safety/emergency procedures, residents' rights and promoting independence before any resident interaction for one NA (NA F) in a sample of five NA employee files reviewed. The facility census was 87. Review of the facility's policy, Nurse Assistants/Certified Nurse Assistants, undated, showed the following: -This policy defines the qualifications, roles and restrictions for Nursing Assistant (NA) Students and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) at the facility; -It ensures compliance with Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS), Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Missouri Nursing Practice Act; -This policy applies to all Nursing Assistant Students, Certified Nursing Assistants, and supervisory staff: -Enrollment in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff prepared and served the correct portion size of food items to residents with a physician's order for a pureed diet, failed to ensure staff prepared and served the correct portion size of food items to residents with a physician's order for a mechanical soft diet and failed to ensure staff prepared and served the correct food items to residents with a physician's order for a regular diet. The facility census was 87. 1. Review of the Diet Type Report, dated 11/18/24, showed two residents had a physician's order for a pureed diet. Review of the Diet Spreadsheet for lunch on 11/18/24 (Week 3, Day 16) showed residents on a pureed diet were to receive the following items: -Pureed smothered pork chop with gravy (#8 dip or ½ cup serving); -Pureed buttered cabbage (4-ounce or ½ cup serving); -Pureed buttered dinner roll (#20 dip or 3 and 1/5-tablespoon serving). Observation on 11/18/24 between 12:30 P.M. to 1:47 P.M. during the lunch meal service, showed staff served residents with a physician's order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the walk-in cooler fan shrouds were free of a buildup of debris; failed to ensure a chest freezer was maintained to keep food items frozen solid; failed to ensure food items were labeled, dated, and closed/sealed; failed to ensure dishware was not stacked and stored wet; and failed to ensure the ice machine was free of a buildup of black debris. The facility census was 87. 1. Observation on 11/18/24 at 10:24 A.M. showed two blue fan shrouds inside the walk-in cooler in the kitchen had a moderate buildup of fuzzy debris. 2. Observation on 11/18/24 at 10:38 A.M. of the thermometer inside the chest freezer, located inside the hot water heater/storage room in the kitchen, showed the temperature inside the freezer was 8 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The freezer contained an unopened box of pie shells, an unopened box of breaded fish, containers of whipped topping and a cardboard box of cookie dough (individual cookies) The packages of whipped topping were soft and were not frozen solid, and the cookie dough was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-27 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the administration of the facility failed to use resources effectively to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility census was 87. 1. Observation and review during the survey process from 11/18/24 through 11/21/24 and 11/25/24 showed the following: -No yearly staff education regarding care of residents with dementia; -No yearly staff education on abuse and neglect; -No yearly required training hours for certified nursing assistants; -No education calendar was completed; -No staff member was monitoring staff education hours; -Review of the staff training did not show required training was completed for all staff or nurse aides/certified nurse assistants; -The facility failed to ensure payroll based journal (PBJ) data was entered and submitted timely; -The facility failed to ensure dietary services were provided to meet residents individual requests on an ongoing basis; -The facility failed to ensure medication orders were followed through with; the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Tuberculin Skin Tests (TST) were completed and documented in accordance with the requirements for Tuberculosis (TB) (infectious bacterial disease that affects the lungs) testing for long-term care employees for six employees, in a review of ten employees, when the facility did not ensure the first-step TST was read on or prior to the employee's start date (first date of compensation). The facility failed to develop and implement a Legionella (bacteria found in water which can cause Legionnaires' disease, a serious type of pneumonia caused by Legionella bacteria that infect the lungs after being inhaled from water or soil.) Prevention Program. The facility failed to ensure staff performed proper hand hygiene when providing incontinence care to one resident (Resident #67), in a review of 20 sampled residents, and failed to ensure all parts of the urinary catheter drainage system was maintained off the floor for one resident (Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 108 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate means of dining furniture/equipment for three residents (Resident #10, #36, and #80) of 20 sampled residents, in order to allow the residents to reach their food and drinks. The residents use a reclining chair on wheels and cannot sit up to the table. The residents sat parallel to the table and had to twist to reach items or place their plates on their laps to try to feed themselves. The facility census was 87. Through an email correspondence on 12/09/24 at 9:57 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) replied the facility had no policy for choices/self determination. 1. Review of Resident #36's care plan, revised 01/22/24, showed the resident needed supervision and touch assistance with eating. Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by staff, dated 7/26/24, showed the following: -Cognitively intact; -No behaviors and did not reject care; -Dependent on staff for bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-27 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were placed in an account separate from the facility operating account. The facility did not provide residents with refunds of their personal funds from the operating account in a timely manner for six residents (Resident #9, #27, #30, #69, #77 and #301). The facility census was 87. Record review of the facility maintained Accounts Receivable Aging Report, dated 11/19/24, showed the following residents with personal funds held in the facility operating account. Resident Amount Held in Operating Account #9 $100.00 #27 $3,708.00 #30 $1,928.00 #69 $22,638.51 #77 $1,072.00 #301 $156.00 Total $29,602.51 During an interview on 11/25/24, at 5:40 P.M., Business Office Manager (BOM) #2 said she was not sure what the amounts on the A/R report were, she would have to check and get back to State Agency (SA) staff. The BOM did not provide any additional information on the details of the amounts shown as money the facility owed to the residents.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-27 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a system to ensure the resident trust fund account was managed in accordance with proper accounting principles by not maintaining an accurate accounting of all monies held in the resident trust fund account and by not reconciling each month. The facility also failed to provide quarterly statements to the residents. The facility managed funds for 27 residents. The facility census was 87. 1. Record review of the facility maintained attempted reconciliation forms, for the period 11/01/23 - 10/31/24, excluding 03/2024, showed the attempted reconciliations did not reconcile to the residents' current balance at the time of reconciliation. 2. During an interview on 11/25/24, at 5:40 P.M., Business Office Manager (BOM) #2 said she did not find any reconciliations of the resident trust account from the previous BOM so there wass only September 2024 and October 2024 reconciliations to review. 3. Record review on 11/21/24 of the facility maintained quarterly statements showed no quarterly statements were given to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-27 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to give appropriate Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) (CMS-10055) and the CMS Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) (CMS-10123) in writing with all required information to three residents (Residents #245, #391, and #246), reviewed in a sample of three residents, when the facility initiated discharge from Medicare Part A Services when benefit days were not exhausted. The facility census was 87. Through an email correspondence on 12/09/24 at 9:57 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) replied the facility had no policy for ABN and NOMNC notices. The facility followed the regulatory guidelines related to these areas. 1. Review of Resident # 245's face sheet shows the resident has a durable power of attorney (DPOA) for health and financial decisions, and the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility was clean and the ceilings and walls were in good repair. The facility failed to ensure the facility was free of persistent strong urine odors and failed to ensure bathroom vents were free from a heavy accumulation of dust and debris. The facility census was 87. Review of the facility policy, Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike Environment, dated 11/1/22, showed the following: -The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and support for daily living safely; -The facility must provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his/her personal belongings to the extent possible; -Housekeeping and maintenance services are necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. 1. Observation on 11/18/24 at 1:47 P.M., showed the ceiling in occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had an area measuring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-27 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident money was free from misappropriation for ten residents (Resident #13, #25, #30, #31, #52, #67, #72, #85, #88 and #243) when Business Office Manager #1 removed and used resident funds in the amount of $6,117.21, for his/her personal use. The deficiency has the potential to affect any resident the facility managed funds for at the time of Business Office Manager #1's employment. The facility census was 87. Review of the facility policy Abuse and Neglect, dated 12/28/23, showed the following: -To outline procedures for reporting and investigating complaints of abuse, neglect and misuse of funds/property, and to define terms of types of abuse/neglect and misappropriation of funds and property. -To ensure immediate reporting all of abuse allegations to the Administrator of designee and the Director of Nursing or designee and outside persons or agencies. -To establish actions related to the alleged perpetrator and to ensure investigation and assessment of all residents involved is completed; -Misuse of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-27 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by staff, according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual for four sampled residents (Residents #30, #80, #19 and #65), in a review of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 87. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, dated October 2023, showed the following: -Medicare and Medicaid participating long-term care facilities are required to conduct comprehensive, accurate, standardized and reproducible assessments of each resident's functional capacity and health status. -The RAI process has multiple regulatory requirements. Federal regulations require that (1) the assessment accurately reflects the resident's status (2) a registered nurse conducts or coordinates each assessment with the appropriate participation of health professionals (3) the assessment process includes direct observation, as well as communication with the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for three residents (Resident #241, #7, and #80), in a review of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 87. During an interview the Director of Nurses (DON) said the facility did not have a policy for completing care plans. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, dated [DATE], showed the following: -The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) must be completed by the 14th day after admission, admission day being day one; -The comprehensive care plan must be completed no later than seven days after the completing of the admission MDS; -The overall care plan should be oriented towards: -Assisting the resident in achieving his/her goals, goals should be measurable. -Individualized interventions that honor the resident's preferences. -Addressing ways to try to preserve and build upon resident strengths. -Preventing avoidable declines in functioning or functional levels or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided assistance with activities of daily Living (ADLs) to six residents (Resident #36, #80, #19, #67, #10, and #83), in a review of 20 sampled residents, to maintain proper grooming, nutrition, and personal and oral hygiene. The census was 87. Review of the facility policy Incontinence Care, dated 11/01/2022, showed the following: -Check the resident at least every two hours, and assist with toileting as needed, if the resident is not on a specified program. -Provide peri care after each incontinent episode. -Change briefs and pads promptly when they are wet or soiled. Review of the facility policy Personal Care, Hygiene, and Grooming, dated 11/01/22, showed the following: -The most important aspect of maintaining good health is good hygiene. -Personal hygiene which is also referred to as a personal care includes all the following: bathing, showering, hair care, nail care, oral hygiene, dental care, and shaving. -Grooming…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-27 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — pattern
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper treatment and care to maintain foot health for three residents (Resident #19, #80, and #44) in a sample of 20 residents. The facility census was 87. Review of the facility policy Personal Care, Hygiene, and Grooming, dated 11/01/2022, showed the following: -Personal hygiene includes nail care; -Clean hands and well-groomed nails prevent infection; -Nail care includes keeping nails trimmed and file, no jagged or broken nails, cleaning underneath to remove debris, hangnails trimmed, no chipped or worn nail polish; -Nail care for residents with diabetes will be provided by the nurse; -Nail trimmers must be cleaned with an alcohol wipe between residents; -Change gloves and wash hands between every resident when providing nail care. 1. Review of the facility Resident Podiatry List, dated 11/14/24, showed the following: -Resident #19's last visit was 07/31/24; -Resident #80 and #44 were not on the list to be seen by the podiatrist.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services to assist three residents (Resident #19, #80 and #4), in a review of 20 sampled residents, in attaining or maintaining their highest level of functioning. The facility failed to prevent further decline of limited range of motion or development/worsening of contractures (shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints). The facility failed to develop restorative plans with goals, frequency of task, number of repetitions, length of time, or direction to staff to meet resident needs. The facility census was 87. Review of the facility policy, Range of Motion, dated 08/15/22, showed the following: -The facility will ensure that a resident who enters the facility without a limited range of motion does not experience a reduction in range of motion unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that a reduction in range of motion is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-27 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess residents for risk of entrapment prior to placement of bedrails, document alternatives attempted prior to bed rail placement, complete entrapment zone measurements, or obtain written consent from the residents and/or their guardians prior to use for two residents (Residents #19 and #20), who used side rails, in a review of 20 sampled residents. Resident #19 had quarter bed rails assessed but half-rails were present on his/her bed. The census was 87. During an interview on 11/25/24 at 2:00 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the facility did not have a policy for entrapment risks and bed rail use. 1. Review of Resident #20's Bed Measurement Device assessment form, dated 11/14/22, showed the following: -Zone one, quarter one = 4.25 inches (<4.75 inches within the rail); -Zone two, no measurements; -Zone three, quarter one =4.375 inches (<4.25 inches under the rail and the mattress); -Zone four and five, no measurements; -Zone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient and competent nursing staff to meet resident needs. The facility consistently had less nursing staff than indicated in the facility assessment. During a resident council meeting, three residents (Resident #4, #74 and #83), voiced concerns of call lights not being answered in a timely manner on night shift and on the weekends. The facility failed to provide restorative nursing to three residents (Resident #19, #80, and #4) in a sample of 20 residents who had contractures when the facility did not employee a restorative aide. The census was 87. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment, dated 11/26/24, showed the average daily facility staffing plan included: -One Hall Monitor; -Two Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA)'s; -Six Certified Medication Technicians (CMT)'s; -Six Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN)s; -One Registered Nurse Director of Nursing (RN/DON). 1. Review of the staffing sheets show the employees work…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation of a policy and procedure for monthly drug regimen reviews and failed to ensure the physicians for three residents (Residents #242, #50, and #33) provided a timely response to the pharmacist's recommendations to decrease the dosage of medications used to treat mental health disorders. The facility census was 87. The facility did not provide a policy to address the facility's system for the monthly drug regimen reviews, including time frames for different steps in the process, steps the pharmacist must take when he/she identifies an irregularity that requires urgent action, and expectations for the physicians to respond timely to identified irregularities/recommendations. 1. Review of Resident #50's face sheet showed the resident's diagnoses included schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by disruptions in thought processes, perceptions, emotional responsiveness, and social interactions) and anxiety disorder. Review of the resident's Critical Care Pharmacy, Note to Attending…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-27 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food to the residents that accommodated their preferences for three residents (Residents #83, #53, and #74), in a review of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 87. 1. Review of Resident #83's Face Sheet showed he/she was his/her own responsible party. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -The resident was cognitively intact; -He/She had a mechanically altered diet. Review of the resident's Physician Order Summary (POS), dated 10/01/23 through 11/30/24, showed the resident had a dietary order for mechanical soft texture. Review of the resident's Care Plan, revised on 11/12/24, showed the following: -The resident was at risk of aspiration; -Serve diet as ordered. Observation on 11/18/24 at 12:40 P.M., showed staff served the resident chili, cabbage and mashed potatoes with gravy. The resident ate all of the chili and cabbage and did not touch the mashed potatoes with gravy. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-27 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff offered suitable, nourishing evening snacks for three residents (Resident #10, #21, and #22), in a review of 23 sampled residents, who wished to have a snack offered. The facility census was 83. During an interview on 2/5/25 at 1:09 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the facility did not have a policy for bedtime snacks or following diet orders. Review of the undated facility Snack Schedule showed the following: -Monday: Fudge Rounds and animal crackers; -Tuesday: Fig Newtons and Honey Buns; -Wednesday: Oranges and animal crackers; -Thursday: Oreos and graham crackers; -Friday: Chips, brownies, and animal crackers; -Saturday: Fudge Rounds and Honey Buns; -Sunday: Oatmeal cookies and baked cookies from dietary. Observation on 2/4/25 at 4:40 P.M. in a locked room near the nurses' station showed a black plastic tote on wheels that contained fig bars and [NAME] bars. 1. Review of Resident #22's Care Plan, revised on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided education and offered, administered, or obtained the signed refusal for the pneumococcal immunization for four residents (Resident #7, #74, #18 and #44) and failed to track immunization history for at least one resident (Resident #7), in a review of 20 sampled residents. The census was 87. Review of the facility policy Pneumonia Vaccine - Pneumococcal Immunization - PPV, revised 12/20/22, showed the following: -PPV should be administered to all residents in the facility unless it is contraindicated or refused; -The Director of Nursing /Designee will maintain a log of all residents on the unit for a record of the immunization process that includes columns for: -Resident name and room number -That the resident/ family member was given information about the vaccine and its benefits and possible side effects; -Date vaccine administered; -Vaccine refused or contraindicated, and reason why; -Temperature for three consecutive days; -Side…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-27 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were educated and offered or obtained consent or refusal of the COVID 19 immunization for two residents (Resident #7, #74) in a review of 20 sampled residents. The census was 87. Review of the facility Policy/ Procedure titled Influenza Immunization - Flu Vaccine- COVID Immunizations, last revised on 11/22/22 showed the following: -The Infection Control Nurse will give the Charge Nurse a log of all residents on the unit for a record of the immunization process that includes columns for: -Resident name and room number -That the resident/ family member was given information about the vaccine and its benefits and possible side effects; -Date vaccine administered; -Vaccine refused or contraindicated, and reason why; -The Charge Nurse will monitor the log daily to make sure it is being filled out correctly. When the log is completed, the Charge Nurse will give it to the Infection Control Nurse; -The Infection Control Nurse will: -Stay…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-27 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a call light at each resident's bedside for the residents to call staff for assistance, affecting two resident (Residents #28 and #68), in a review of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 87. Review of the facility policy, resident call system, dated 08/02/24, showed the following: -Each resident room will be provided with a call light in the event they require assistance from staff; -Each resident room should be equipped with at least two (four for the Quad rooms) call lights so that each resident can request staff assistance; -All call lights should be within reach of each resident; -All staff are expected to respond to call lights, or let the necessary personnel know the lights are going off and residents require assistance. 1. Review of the resident #67's care plan last revised 8/5/24 showed the following: -Required extensive assist for activities of daily living; -Two staff assist with transfers and mechanical lift;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-27 · tag F0941 — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all employees completed communication training for three employees (Certified Medication Technician (CMT), CMT J, and CNA R) in a sample of four employee files reviewed. The facility identified specific training needs in the facility assessment, and did not have documentation or evidence the required training was completed. The facility census was 87. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 09/26/24, showed the the following: -Staff training, education, and competencies: Describe the staff training/education and competencies that are necessary to provide the level and types of support and care needed for your resident population; -Include staff certification requirements as applicable, testing policies, and your competency evaluations; -Training required - new hires: -Additional training for care givers (Nursing and Activities) - 2 hours: -Care of cognitively impaired - 1.0 hour - Required by Medicare Rules of Participation; -Communicating with older adults with dementia - 1.0 hours - Required by Rules of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-27 · tag F0942 — pattern
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all employees received training on resident rights. The facility identified specific training needs in the facility assessment, and did not have documentation or evidence the required training was completed for three of four employees reviewed (Certified Medication Technician (CMT) D, CMT J, and CNA R), or a current plan to ensure the training would be completed. The facility census was 87. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 09/26/24, showed the the following: -Staff training, education, and competencies: Describe the staff training/education and competencies that are necessary to provide the level and types of support and care needed for your resident population; -Include staff certification requirements as applicable, testing policies, and your competency evaluations; -Training required - new hires: -All Employees - 5.75 hours; -Abuse/Resident Rights - 1.25 hours; -Resident rights - .50 hours - Required by Medicare Rules of Participation; -All staff annual training - courses and inservices: -Resident Rights…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-27 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide training for abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property and the reporting and prevention of incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property for three employees (Certified Medication Technician (CMT) D, CMT J, and Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) R) of four employee records reviewed, as directed in the facility assessment and the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy. The facility census was 87. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 09/26/24, showed the the following: -Staff training, education, and competencies: Describe the staff training/education and competencies that are necessary to provide the level and types of support and care needed for your resident population; -Include staff certification requirements as applicable, testing policies, and your competency evaluations; -Training required - new hires: -All Employees, Abuse/Resident rights - 1.25 hours, and preventing, recognizing and reporting abuse - .75 hours - required by Elder Justice Act…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-27 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — pattern
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all employees completed education on infection control. The facility identified specific training needs in the facility assessment. The facility did not have documentation or evidence the required training was completed for four of four employees (Certified Medication Technician (CMT) D, CMT J, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) R and CNA I) reviewed, or a current plan to ensure the training would be completed. The facility census was 87. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 09/26/24, showed the the following: -Staff training, education, and competencies: Describe the staff training/education and competencies that are necessary to provide the level and types of support and care needed for your resident population; -Include staff certification requirements as applicable, testing policies, and your competency evaluations; -Other inservice training: -Handwashing, peri-care, ostomy care, catheter care, bowel and bladder (B&B) training, glove usage; -All departments: -Blood borne pathogens, Occupational Safety and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-27 · tag F0946 — pattern
    Provide training in compliance and ethics.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all staff completed compliance and ethics training. The facility identified specific training needs in the facility assessment. The facility did not have documentation or evidence the required training was completed for two of four employees (Certified Medication Technician (CMT) D and CMT J - employees who had been working at the facility for at least one year), and one Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) R, of two employees newly hired in the last year, or a current plan to ensure the training would be completed. The facility census was 87. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 09/26/24, showed the the following: -Staff training, education, and competencies: Describe the staff training/education and competencies that are necessary to provide the level and types of support and care needed for your resident population; -Include staff certification requirements as applicable, testing policies, and your competency evaluations; -Training required - new hires: - All Employees - 5.75 hours; Compliance - two hours,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-27 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) had no less than 12 hours of in-service education per year based on their individual performance review, calculated by hire date. The facility identified two Certified Medication Technicians (CMTs) employed by the facility for more than a year (no CNAs or NAs had been employed for a year). Two CMTs (CMT J and CMT D), were sampled and two out of two did not have the required 12 hours of in-service education, or training for abuse. One CMT of two did attend an in-service that included the topic of abuse, but there was no agenda provided, depth or scope of the training. None of the two sampled staff attended an in-service that included the topic of dementia. One of the two sampled CMT's attended an in-service for behaviors, but there was no agenda, depth, or scope of the training. None of the two sampled attended an in-service regarding care of the cognitively impaired resident. The facility census was 87. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 09/26/24, showed the the following:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-27 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an effective training program was in place for all new and existing staff. The facility identified specific training needs in the facility assessment, the facility did not have documentation or evidence the required training was completed for two employees (Certified Medication Technician (CMT) D and CMT J) of two employee education files (of employees who had been working at the facility for at least one year), and for two additional employees (CNA I and CNA R), (who had not been employed by the facility for one year) reviewed, or a current plan to ensure the training would be completed. The facility also failed to include behavioral health training for new hires or annually when the facility had a locked unit for residents with mental illness and behavior issues, and a provided care for a resident population with mental illness and behavior concerns identified in the facility assessment. The facility census was 87. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 09/26/24, showed the the following: -Services offered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that enhanced resident dignity and ensured full recognition of individuality for two residents (Resident #20 and #36), in a review of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 87. Review of the facility policy Respect/Dignity/Right to have Personal Property, dated 11/1/22, showed the following: -It is the policy of the facility to provide care and services in such a manner to acknowledge and respect resident rights. -Exercising rights means that residents have autonomy and choice, to the maximum extent possible, about how they wish to live their everyday lives and receive care, subject to the facility's rules, if those rules do not violate a regulatory requirement. -The resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity. 1. Review Resident #20's Care Plan, last revised 6/12/24, showed the following: -The resident required one to two staff to assist with transfers; -The resident required staff assistance with choices and supervision, cueing, encouragement and physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument, in the time frame required by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) for two residents (Residents #4, and #241), in a sample of 20 residents, and for one additional resident (Resident #243). The facility census was 87. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, revised October 2024, showed the following: -The Annual assessment is a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed on an annual basis (at least every 366 days) unless an significant change in status assessment (SCSA) has been completed since the most recent comprehensive assessment was completed. -The assessment reference date (ARD) must be set within 366 days after the ARD of the previous Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) comprehensive assessment (ARD of previous comprehensive assessment + 366 calendar days) and within 92 days since the ARD of the previous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-27 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change status assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment, required to be completed by facility staff, for two residents (Residents #36 and #80), in a review of 20 sampled residents. This assessment should have been completed within 14 days after the facility determined, or should have determined, there had been a significant change (major decline or improvement in the resident's status) in the resident's physical or mental condition which had an impact on more than one area of the resident's health status and required interdisciplinary review and/or revision of the care plan. The facility census was 87. Review of the Long Term Care Facility RAI User's Manual, version 3.0 showed a significant change is a decline or improvement in a resident's status that: -Will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions, is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order to decrease a psychotropic medication for one resident (Resident #73), in a review of 20 sampled residents. The census was 87. Review of Resident #73's care plan, last revised 10/4/24, showed the following: -Diagnoses included anxiety, bipolar disorder (high to low mood swings), depression and schizophrenia (disability to think, feel and behave clearly); -The resident had history of verbal aggression, rejection of medication, rejection of care, disruptive behaviors, delusional behaviors and aggressive behaviors and altercations with peers; -Administer medications as ordered. Review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 11/2024 showed an order for diazepam 10 mg one tablet by mouth three times daily (original order dated 7/24/24). Review of the pharmacist consultation report, dated 10/23/24, showed on 11/17/24, the physician agreed with and signed the recommendation to decrease the resident's bedtime dose of 10 mg diazepam to 5 mg. Review of the resident's Physician's Orders, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-27 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist two residents (Residents #44 and 33), in a review of 20 sampled residents, to obtain vision services when the residents asked for an appointment. The census was 87. The facility provided no policy for vision services/appointments upon request. 1. Review of Resident #44's face sheet showed he/she was his/her own responsible party. Review of the resident's admission (readmission) Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally required assessment completed by staff, dated 1/25/24, showed the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview on 11/19/24, at 11:45 A.M., the resident said he/she requested an appointment for the eye doctor and was waiting to go to the eye doctor for over a year. He/She could not see far away, and things up close were also fuzzy. He/She could not see the clock most of the time and had trouble reading normal print. He/She was supposed to have glasses. His/Her insurance only covered visits to one location. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-27 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #50), in a review of 20 sampled residents, received dental services when the resident was diagnosed with an abscessed tooth and was to be seen by a dentist. The facility census was 87. The facility provided no policy for dental services/appointments upon request. Review of Resident #50's face sheet showed he/she had a guardian. Review of the resident's progress note, dated 07/09/24 showed the following: -The resident was seen on the primary care physician's rounds; -The resident had complaints of left lower jaw pain secondary to dental abscess; -The resident had swelling in his/her left lower mandible (jaw bone) due to dental abscess; -The diagnosis was dental abscess; -The plan was to order an antibiotic and narcotic pain medication along with a dental appointment; -The physician signed the encounter on 07/09/24 at 10:32 A.M. Review of the resident's progress note, dated 07/09/24 at 11:04 A.M., showed the following: -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-27 · tag F0944 — isolated
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) process training was completed for all staff. The facility identified specific training needs in the facility assessment. The facility did not have documentation or evidence the required training was completed for two employees of four employees (Certified Medication Technician (CMT) D and CMT J) (of employees who have been working at the facility for at least one year) reviewed, or a current plan to ensure the training would be completed. The facility census was 87. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 09/26/24, showed the the following: -Staff training, education, and competencies: Describe the staff training/education and competencies that are necessary to provide the level and types of support and care needed for your resident population; -Include staff certification requirements as applicable, testing policies, and your competency evaluations; -November - QAPI plan review; -December sessions include QAPI plan. 1. Review of CMT D's employee file, showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Refer to Event ID C0JV13 This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, see the Statement of Deficiencies dated 05/29/24. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary and orderly environment in resident rooms. The facility census was 102. Review of the facility policy Synergy Cleaning dated 8/1/24 showed the following: -The purpose is to provide a safe and clean environment for residents; -Clean horizontal services, including window sills; -Spot check floors, clean any spills or trouble areas and pick up any trash. Identify any odors and attend to them immediately; -Sweep floors, move furniture and beds away from walls; -Wet mop floors, move furniture and beds away from walls. During an interview on 7/24/24 at 11:25 A.M. Resident #4 said his/her sheets were not changed on shower days and he/she would have to ask staff several times to get them changed. During an interview on 7/24/24 at 11:28 A.M., Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Refer to Event ID C0JV13 This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, see the Statement of Deficiencies dated 05/29/24. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate resident preferences by not consistently providing alternate food items per the resident's preference for four residents (Residents #7, #10, #15, and #1), a review of 29 sampled residents. The facility census was 102. Review of the facility policy, Alternative Meal Choices, Substitutions and Snacks, dated 11/01/22, showed the following: -The facility will ensure all residents are provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balance diet or appropriate substitute; -All residents will be offered alternative meal/snacks if they choose not to accept what is being served; -The dietary manager/designee will educate all kitchen staff to offer substitutes to any resident that refuses meals/snacks; -The dietary manger will ensure all resident meal cards have residents likes/dislikes on them and serve resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, staff failed to ensure four residents (Resident #2, #7, #12 and #14), were treated in a dignified manner when the residents were not allowed to wear incontinence briefs when in bed as they wished. Resident #2 said he/she had refused visitors, because he/she was afraid of exposing himself/herself due to not being allowed to wear incontinent briefs. The facility census was 103. Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, dated 11/1/22, showed the following: -All residents have rights guaranteed to them under Federal and State laws and regulations. This policy is intended to lay the foundation for the resident rights requirements in long-term care facilities. Each resident has the right to be treated with dignity and respect. All activities and interactions with residents by any staff, temporary agency or volunteers must focus on assisting the resident in maintaining and enhancing his/her self-esteem and self-worth and incorporating the resident's goals,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for one resident (Resident #4), who was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] following an inpatient psychiatric evaluation for a suicide attempt. The facility failed to administer Klonopin (a sedative used to treat panic disorder and anxiety) as ordered to the resident following his/her return from the hospital, for over four days. The census was 103. Review of the facility Medication Administration Policy, dated 11/30/22, showed the following: -The facility will provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing. and administering of all medications, to meet the needs of each resident; -When getting the medication out of the resident's drawer, check to make sure it is the: -a. Right resident; -b. Right medication; -c. Right dose; -d. Right time; -e. Right route; -Check the label of the medication against the order on the resident's electronic medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Refer to C0JV12 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary and orderly environment in showers and bathrooms. The facility census was 98. 1. During an interview on 5/29/24 at 4:20 P.M., the administrator said they did not have a policy for housekeeping services. Observation of the shower room located on C Hall on 5/28/24 at 12:15 P.M. showed the following: -There was fecal material on the toilet seat and around the toilet bowl; -The floor in front of the toilet was dirty with fecal material; -A washcloth was present on the back of the stool with fecal material on the washcloth; -Hangers and clothes were scattered around the shower room floor; -The bathroom had a strong odor of urine and feces. Observation of the shower room located on C Hall on 5/28/24 at 3:40 P.M. showed the following: -Fecal material remained on the toilet seat and around the toilet bowl; -The floor in front of the toilet was dirty with fecal material; -The soiled washcloth remained on the back of the stool; -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Refer to C0JV12 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff prepared and served food items that were attractive and palatable. The facility census was 98. Review of the policy provided by the facility labeled dining room-meals dated 8/2024 showed no documented procedures for food preparation service. 1. During an interview on 5/28/24 at 11:20 A.M., Resident #16 said the following: -He/She described the food served at the facility as slop; -The food tasted nasty and was cold; -He/She sent the food back 99% of the time because it was not edible. During an interview on 5/28/24 at 11:25 A.M., Resident #17 said the food was cold and tasted nasty. During an interview on 5/28/24 at 11:30 A.M. Resident #6 said the following: -The food the facility served did not have any flavor; -The vegetables were usually mushy. -His/Her family brought in food for him/her to eat, because the food was often not edible. -He/She stored food in a cooler in his/her room. Observation of lunch on 5/28/24 at 12:40 P.M. showed the following: -Residents were served meatloaf, mashed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Refer to C0JV12 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Resident #1 and #4) of 17 sampled residents were provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet when staff failed to serve appropriate food substitutes to honor resident preferences. The facility census was 98. Review of the facility's policy, Dining Room-Meals dated 8/2024, showed the following: -Offer substitutes to any resident who refused food; -Assist the resident with meals as indicated on the resident's care plan. 1. Review of Resident #1's dietary assessment, dated 1/9/24, showed the following: -He/She was prescribed a regular diet; -He/She was edentulous (without teeth); -There was no documentation of the resident's preferences. Review of the resident's care plan, last revised on 4/16/24, showed the following: -He/She was prescribed a regular diet and had several food likes and dislikes; -Food dislikes included pork, including bacon, turkey of any kind, lettuce, tomatoes, onions, and pickles; -Preferences would be added to meal card, given provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure five confidential residents (Resident #6, #7, #8, #9 and #10) felt like they could voice concerns to staff or the state agency (SA) without fear of retaliation. The facility also failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect when Registered Nurse (RN) A talked to residents in a rude and disrespectful manner and used profanity around the residents. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) B told Resident #9 to clean up his/her mess in the bathroom after the resident was incontinent of stool on the bathroom floor. CNA B pulled Resident #8's blankets off of him/her early in the morning and said the resident could not have his/her blanket back until the resident got out of bed. The facility census was 97. Review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights, dated 11/1/22, showed the following: -All residents have rights guaranteed to them under Federal and State laws and regulations. This policy is intended to lay the foundation for the resident rights requirements in long-term care facilities. Each resident has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary and orderly environment in showers and bathrooms. The facility census was 98. 1. During an interview on 5/29/24 at 4:20 P.M., the administrator said they did not have a policy for housekeeping services. Observation of the shower room located on C Hall on 5/28/24 at 12:15 P.M. showed the following: -There was fecal material on the toilet seat and around the toilet bowl; -The floor in front of the toilet was dirty with fecal material; -A washcloth was present on the back of the stool with fecal material on the washcloth; -Hangers and clothes were scattered around the shower room floor; -The bathroom had a strong odor of urine and feces. Observation of the shower room located on C Hall on 5/28/24 at 3:40 P.M. showed the following: -Fecal material remained on the toilet seat and around the toilet bowl; -The floor in front of the toilet was dirty with fecal material; -The soiled washcloth remained on the back of the stool; -The bathroom had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately administer insulin (injectable medication used to treat diabetes) to four residents (Resident #1, #2, #3 and #4) of four sampled residents who received insulin injections, when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A did not prime (remove air) from the insulin pen needle prior to administration, and did not hold the needle in the skin after administration as directed by the manufacturer of the medication. The census was 91. Review of the facility policy, Blood Glucose Monitoring, dated 01/10/22, showed it did not address the specific procedure to follow when administering insulin via an insulin pen. Review of the facility policy, Medication Administration, dated 11/30/22, showed it did not address the specific procedure to follow when administering insulin via an insulin pen. Multiple requests for a facility insulin administration policy requested with no policy provided. Review of the manufacturer's information for Humalog insulin (fast acting medication used to control blood sugars (the amount of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff prepared and served food items that were attractive and palatable. The facility census was 98. Review of the policy provided by the facility labeled dining room-meals dated 8/2024 showed no documented procedures for food preparation service. 1. During an interview on 5/28/24 at 11:20 A.M., Resident #16 said the following: -He/She described the food served at the facility as slop; -The food tasted nasty and was cold; -He/She sent the food back 99% of the time because it was not edible. During an interview on 5/28/24 at 11:25 A.M., Resident #17 said the food was cold and tasted nasty. During an interview on 5/28/24 at 11:30 A.M. Resident #6 said the following: -The food the facility served did not have any flavor; -The vegetables were usually mushy. -His/Her family brought in food for him/her to eat, because the food was often not edible. -He/She stored food in a cooler in his/her room. Observation of lunch on 5/28/24 at 12:40 P.M. showed the following: -Residents were served meatloaf, mashed potatoes with gravy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Resident #1 and #4) of 17 sampled residents were provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet when staff failed to serve appropriate food substitutes to honor resident preferences. The facility census was 98. Review of the facility's policy, Dining Room-Meals dated 8/2024, showed the following: -Offer substitutes to any resident who refused food; -Assist the resident with meals as indicated on the resident's care plan. 1. Review of Resident #1's dietary assessment, dated 1/9/24, showed the following: -He/She was prescribed a regular diet; -He/She was edentulous (without teeth); -There was no documentation of the resident's preferences. Review of the resident's care plan, last revised on 4/16/24, showed the following: -He/She was prescribed a regular diet and had several food likes and dislikes; -Food dislikes included pork, including bacon, turkey of any kind, lettuce, tomatoes, onions, and pickles; -Preferences would be added to meal card, given provided space and a list of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff offered suitable, nourishing evening snacks for residents who wished to have a snack for five residents (Resident #1, #4, #8 #11, and #13) of 29 sampled residents. The facility also failed to ensure all residents were provided equal opportunity to have a snack. The facility census was 102. Review of a facility policy provided for provision of resident snacks showed the policy did not address snacks. 1. During an interview on 7/25/24 at 4:00 P.M., Resident #11 said the following: -He/She was a diabetic; -He/She had no money to buy his/her own snacks; -Staff placed snacks at the nurse's station in the evening, around 8:30 P.M., but if you did not get up there soon enough, you would not get a snack; -Residents have to ask for them or go get them themselves; -Snacks consisted of honey buns and [NAME] Butter cookies; -A lot of times there were not enough snacks and the last three nights there were no snacks; -Staff did not go room to room and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were appropriately followed when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A failed to properly sanitize the glucometer (a device used to evaluate the amount of sugar in the blood by obtaining a droplet of blood for sampling) in between use and after becoming soiled for four residents (Residents #1, #2, #3 and #4), of four sampled residents who had blood sugars tested. The facility census was 91. Review of the facility Blood Glucose Monitoring Policy, dated 01/10/22, showed the following: -Clean and disinfect blood glucose meter after use according to manufacturer specifications if it is used on more than one resident; -Cleaning, and disinfection of blood glucose meters: a. Each resident who has orders for blood sugar checks should have blood sugars checked with the glucometer; b. Before and or between each resident's blood sugar check, the glucometer should be appropriately sanitized before performing the task; c.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a call light at each resident's bedside for the residents to call staff for assistance, affecting Resident #26 and Resident #27, and the entire 100-hall. Twenty-four residents resided on the 100-hall including Resident #1, #28, #29 and #24). The facility census was 102. During an interview on 7/25/24, at 3:30 P.M., the Administrator said the facility did not have a policy for call lights. Observation on 7/24/24 at 1:26 P.M., showed Resident #26 and Resident #27 lived in the same bedroom. There were no call lights in the room. Review of Resident #26's Care Plan, dated 6/4/24, showed the following: -Resident admitted [DATE]; -Diagnosis of schizophrenia (mental disorder with rapid thoughts and perceptions that may not be true) and bipolar (mental disorder with manic or severe depression episodes); -The care plan did not include any self harm or suicidal ideation concerns. During an interview on 7/24/24, at 1:30 P.M., Resident #26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to create an environment respectful of the rights of each resident to make choices about significant aspects of their lives for one resident under guardianship (Resident #23) in a review of 29 sampled residents. The facility enforced restrictions from the guardian without rationale for the safety or well-being of the resident. The facility census was 102. Review of the facility's policy Resident Restriction per Facility/Guardian and Compassionate Care Visits, dated 11/1/22, showed the following: -The primary goal of compassionate care is to give residents a sense of dignity while respecting the resident's privacy and wishes. It emphasizes improving the quality of life through empathy and quality of care. -A health care facility may adopt reasonable safety or security restrictions or other requirements for visitors. The facility did not provide a requested policy on resident rights. During an interview on 7/30/24, the Administrator said if any of the requested policies were not provided they did not have one. 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided alternative meal options of similar nutritive value to residents who chose not to eat the planned menu for the meal. The facility census was 82. During interview on 2/7/24 at 1:30 P.M. the Assistant Administrator said the facility had no policy regarding alternative meal options and nutritional requirements. Review of the facility menu, week at a glance, for week one, dated 11/26/23, showed the menu did not include an alternative meal option for each meal that was served on the menu. During an interview on 2/5/24 at 10:42 A.M., Resident #8 said he/she didn't always like what was served at meals. The only alternate option served was a grilled cheese sandwich and cheese puffs (a puffed corn snack coated with cheese or cheese flavored powder). He/She would like a healthier option such as a chef salad. He/She was tired of eating grilled cheese sandwiches and cheese puffs. During interview on 2/5/24 at 11:15 A.M. Resident #13 said the facility provided grilled cheese sandwiches and cheese…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse when one resident (Resident #1) in a review of 17 residents, tested positive for cocaine on 1/20/23 in a urine drug test following transfer to the hospital on 1/19/23 for medical care. The facility became aware of the positive urine drug screen on 1/23/24. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility Abuse and Neglect Policy dated 12/28/23 showed the following: -The purpose was to outline procedures for reporting and investigation complaints of abuse and neglect and to ensure investigation and assessment of all residents involved was completed; -Upon learning of the report of abuse or neglect, the administrator shall initiate an incident investigation. The nursing staff was additionally responsible for reporting and investigating. Once the administrator or designee determined there was a reasonable possibility that mistreatment occurred, the administrator would appoint a person to take charge of the investigation; -The investigation would include assessment of all residents involved…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #16), in a review of 17 sampled residents, received dental services, including care of decayed and lost teeth, who experienced tooth pain and difficulty eating. The facility also failed to follow up with recommendations for further dental intervention. The facility census was 82. During interview on 2/7/24 at 1:20 P.M. the Assistant Administrator said the facility had no dental care policy regarding dental appointments and follow up to recommendations for dental care. 1. Review of Resident #16's care plan, revised 10/22/23, showed the following: -Diagnoses of tremors, macular degeneration, abnormal gait and mobility, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and COPD; -Difficulty with completing activities of daily living (ADLs). Staff should provide assistance with ADLs. The resident was able to feed self and required staff participation with oral care. Review of the resident's outside dental provider summary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Resident #3, #4, and #8) who required staff assistance with showers, received the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene, in a review of eight sampled residents. Staff failed to provide assistance with nail care, grooming, and shaving. The facility census was 76. Review of the facility policy Personal Care, Hygiene, and Grooming, revised 1/21/23, showed the following: -The most important aspect of maintaining good health is good hygiene. Personal hygiene, which is referred to as personal care, includes bathing, showering, hair care, nail care, oral hygiene and dental care, and shaving; -Personal care is keeping the body clean. This helps prevent the spread of germs. Grooming is essential for the well being of the resident; -Bathing schedules are located at the nurse's station and are initialed by the Director of Nursing (DON) in collaboration with shower aide/designee; -Residents are bathed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain professional standards of practice when staff failed to complete weekly skin assessments for two residents (Resident #2 and #3) per facility policy, in a review of eight sampled residents. The facility also failed to follow physician orders for dressing changes as ordered for one resident (Resident #3). The facility census was 76. Review of the facility policy Skin Assessment, dated 11/30/22, showed the following: -The facility will ensure that a resident who enters the facility without pressure ulcers does not develop pressure ulcers unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable; -Assess the resident's skin on day one of admission, and immediately implement care planning for a resident at risk for pressure ulcers; -Complete a comprehensive head to toe assessment of the resident's skin with each scheduled assessment and with any significant change of condition, that includes evaluating risk factors such as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders in a timely manner for rehabilitation services for three residents (Resident #2, #4, #7) in a review of eight sampled residents. The facility census was 76. Review of the facility policy Specialized Rehabilitative and Restorative Services, dated 1/17/23, showed the following: -It is the policy of the facility to provide specialized rehabilitative and restorative services in accordance with state and federal regulations; -The facility will provide specialized rehabilitative services such as, but not limited to physical therapy, speech language pathology, occupational therapy, respiratory therapy and rehabilitative services for mental illness and intellectual disability or services of lesser intensity as set forth at 483.120 (c), as required in the resident's comprehensive care plan; -The facility will ensure that specialized rehabilitative services are provided under the written order of a physician by qualified personnel. 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-03 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were placed in an account separate from the facility operating account. The facility did not provide residents with refunds of their personal funds from the operating account in a timely manner for seven residents (Resident #3, #4, #6, #7, #8, #9 and #10). The facility census was 72. 1. Record review of the facility maintained Accounts Receivable Report for the period 10/01/22 through 10/16/23, showed the following residents with personal funds held in the facility operating account; Resident Amount Held in Operating Account #4 $514.32 #6 $88.00 #7 $1,419.00 #8 $7,641.09 #9 $6,324.10 #10 $9.78 Total $15,996.29 During an interview on 10/16/23 at 3:58 P.M., the Administrator said a new biller started in 07/2023. During an interview on 10/17/23 at 12:32 P.M., the Accounts Receivable [NAME] and Collections Manager said a different company did the billing up to 07/2023. During email correspondence on 10/17/23 at 11:13 P.M., the Accounts Receivable [NAME] and Collections Manager said he/she was not sure why…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Residents #4 and #6), in a review of 11 sampled residents, were treated with dignity and respect when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A, CNA B and CNA G searched through the resident's personal belongings without their permission. The facility census was 70. Review of the facility's undated Resident's Rights policy showed the following: -The purpose of the policy is to ensure that resident rights are protected; -At the time of admission, a list of resident rights shall be given to each resident, his/her designee, next of kin or guardian. A list of resident rights shall be posted in the facility and available upon request. Review of the facility's undated Resident Searches policy showed the following: -The purpose of the policy is to maintain the safety of the residents and employees of the facility by monitoring items brought into the facility; -It is the intent of the facility to add interventions to better promote the safety and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed complete background checks as required for eight employees (Housekeeping Supervisor, Maintenance Supervisor, administrator, Minimum Data Set Coordinator, Social Services, Transportation E, Nurse Aide D, and Certified Nurse Aide/Certified Medication Technician F) in a review of ten new employees hired prior to employment. Further review showed the facility failed to check the Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) Registry for any Federal indicators of abuse, neglect or misappropriation of property for eight new employees (Housekeeping Supervisor, RN C, Maintenance Supervisor, Administrator, NA D, Director of Nurses, Minimum Data Set Coordinator or Transportation E) prior to employment. Additionally the facility failed to develop/implement a policy for investigation of a misappropriation of personal property in a sample of 20 residents. The facility census was 78. Review of Policy/Procedure document for background checks, dated 11/01/22, showed the following: -Policy Statement: The facility will conduct background checks in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure sanitary practices in the kitchen. The facility census was 78. Observations in the kitchen on 11/28/22 at 9:44 A.M. and on 11/29/22 at 8:51 A.M., showed the following: -The baffle filters in the range hood were covered with a thick layer of clear grease and dust; -A 24 inch by 24 inch ceiling vent, located above the steam table area, was covered in a thick layer of dust; -A 24 inch by 24 inch ceiling vent, located above the desert/drink preparation area, was covered in a thick layer of dust -A 24 inch by 24 inch ceiling vent, located above the food preparation area, was covered in a thick layer of dust. Observation in the kitchen on 11/28/22 at 10:04 A.M., showed the dishwashing staff stacked wet food storage containers and steam table pans and put them away while they were wet. During interview on 11/28/22 at 02:48 P.M., the dietary manager said the second shift dietary staff were responsible to clean the baffle filters every Monday evening. Staff did not document when they cleaned the baffle filters. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-12-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an antibiotic stewardship protocol/program and a system to monitor appropriate antibiotic use. The facility failed to fully complete the antibiotic tracking done from 9/30/22-11/24/22. The facility also failed to include one sampled resident's (Resident #37) out of 20 sampled residents, and two additionally sampled resident's (Resident #18, and #176) in the antibiotic tracking done from 9/30/22-11/24/22. The facility census was 78. Review of the facility's Policy Infection Control Nurse-Job Description, dated 11/1/22, showed the following: -Directs and maintains an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection in the facility; -Acts a facility's Antibiotic Steward: a. Outlines antibiotic use protocols; b. Monitors antibiotic use; c. Documents findings and reports them to Quality Assurance committee; -Investigates, controls, and prevents infections in the facility; -Analyzes data and trends in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-12-07 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespread
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff, as well as contracted staff, were routinely tested for Coronavirus disease (COVID-19/an infectious disease cause by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) according to facility policy. This affected nine staff members and two contract staff and had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 78. Review of the facility's undated policy Action Plan - COVID-19, showed the following: -The following action plan captures the most up-to-date information enabling us to be proactive in adopting practices to keep our residents, staff, and visitors safe; -Facility-onset case definition: Following the definition from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), a COVID-19 case that originated in the facility; -Round of testing definition: The first round of testing refers to having one test performed for all residents and staff, which should be completed within one to three days; -Resident and staff testing conducted as required by CMS, see COVID-19 testing guidance. Review of the undated facility policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-07 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to convey resident funds within 30 days of discharge to the resident and/or responsible party for five residents (Resident #400, #401, #402, #403 and #404). The facility census was 78. Review of the facility Resident Trust Policy dated [DATE] showed the facility shall refund the balance of the resident's personal funds when a resident is discharged . The amount shall be refunded by the end of the month following the month of discharge or by State/Federal specific guidelines if such policies are more stringent. 1. Review of Resident #401's medical record showed the resident was discharged to another facility on [DATE]. Review of the facility's Trust Transaction History report dated [DATE] showed the resident's trust fund balance was $25.47. Review showed no documentation the facility returned the resident's funds to the resident or the resident's responsible party. 2. Review of Resident #400's medical record showed the resident was discharged to another…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment by failing to maintain walls, ceilings, floors and doors in resident rooms in good repair. The facility census was 78. 1. Observations on 11/28/22 at 10:42 A.M., in room [ROOM NUMBER], showed the following: -Large brown rings on the ceiling above the window that extended the length of window and approximately two feet out from the wall; -Scratches and deep gouges on the wall by the bed by the door to the room and holes in drywall in three places with white crumbling drywall exposed; -Particles of brown substance on the floor. The floor was sticky; -Scuffs on the bathroom door facing into the resident room. During an interview on 11/28/22 at 10:42 A.M., Resident #3 said the ceiling has been like that since he/she got to the facility (April 2022). He/She was tired of looking at it. 2. Observation of room B13 on 11/29/22 at 9:23 A.M., showed a brown colored stain on the ceiling that had cracked open.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-07 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide accurate comprehensive assessments to reflect the resident's status for three residents (Residents #14, #18, and #59), in a review of 20 sampled residents. The inaccuracy had the potential to negatively affect the person-center care plan and services the facility provided to the resident. The facility census was 78. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, a manual with guidance on how to complete MDS assessments, dated 10/1/19, showed the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) refers to the last day of the observation (or look back) period that the assessment covers for the resident. Since a day begins at 12:00 A.M. and ends at 11:59 P.M., the ARD must also cover this time period. The facility is required to set the ARD on the MDS Item Set or in the facility software within the required time frame of the assessment type being completed. This concept of setting the ARD is used for all assessment types and varies by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a plan of care consistent with resident's specific conditions, needs and risks to provide effective person-centered care for seven residents (Residents #6, #14, #21, #24, #27, #36, and #59), in a review of 20 sampled residents, and for one additional resident (Resident #176). The facility census was 78. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, dated October 2019, showed the following: -The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) must be completed by the 14th day after admission, admission day being day one; -The comprehensive care plan must be completed no later than seven days after the completing of the admission MDS; -The overall care plan should be oriented towards: 1. Assisting the resident in achieving his/her goals, goals should be measurable. 2. Individualized interventions that honor the resident's preferences. 3. Addressing ways to try to preserve and build upon resident strengths. 4. Preventing avoidable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standard of care for three residents (Resident #30, #19 and #41) when staff failed to follow physician's orders for care. The facility census was 78. Review of the facility policy Transcription of Orders and Following Physician's Orders dated 11/1/22 showed the following: -The purpose of this policy is to outline procedures in accurately transcribing physician's orders and to ensure that all physicians' orders are followed; -The Licensed/Registered Nurse (RN) will check the emergency kit to verify if the medication is present in the facility to being immediately. If the medication is not available, the facility may contact the backup pharmacy to deliver the medication sooner. If the medication is unable to be started within 24 hours of the order, the prescribing physician will be notified and further orders will be obtained. In the event that a stat medication is ordered, the physician will be made aware of facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff provided the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene and prevent body odor for eight residents (Resident #6, #21, #24, #25, #27, #40, #61, and #125), who required assistance to perform their activities of daily living, in a review of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 78. Review of the facility's Personal Care, Hygiene, and Grooming policy, dated 11/1/22, showed the following: -Personal hygiene which is also referred to as a personal care includes all the following: bathing and showering, hair care, nail care, oral hygiene and dental care, and shaving; -The resident's bath schedule is in the plan of care, located at the nurses' station and are initiated by the Director of Nursing in collaboration with the shower aide. The schedules are then placed in electronic medical record; -The residents are bathed according to preferences, including time of day, and day of the week, bed bath, tub…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to implement respiratory and oxygen interventions and monitoring, maintain CPAP/BIPAP (continuous or bilevel positive airway pressure therapy, a common treatment for obstructive sleep apnea) equipment according to the facility's policy for two residents (Residents #3 and #37), in a review of 20 sampled residents, and for one additional resident (Resident #18). The facility census was 78. Review of the facility's Oxygen policy, dated 11/1/22, showed the following: -There must be a physician's order for oxygen use which includes the route and liter flow or specific oxygen concentration and how long the oxygen is to be administered; -Setting up oxygen administration: connect the flow meter to the canister or wall outlet, fill the humidifier to its full mark with water, connect the humidifier to the flow meter with oxygen tubing, connect the humidifier to the nasal cannula or mask with oxygen tubing, check that oxygen is flowing properly,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-07 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess residents for risk of entrapment, document attempted alternatives prior to installing a bed rail, or obtain informed consent with risks prior to installing and using a bed rail for three residents with bed rails (Residents #8, #20, and #27), in a review of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 78. The facility did not have a policy on bed rail use. Review of the Food and Drug Administration's Guide of Bed Safety, Bed Rails in Hospitals, Nursing Homes and Home Health Care: The Facts, revised April 2010, showed the following: Patients who have problems with memory, sleeping, incontinence, pain, uncontrolled body movement, or who get out of bed and walk unsafely without assistance, must be carefully assessed for the best ways to keep them from harm, such as falling; -Assessment by the patient's health care team will help to determine how best to keep the patient safe; -Potential risks of bed rails may include strangling,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-07 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care, including medications and treatments, and signed and dated all orders for six additional residents (Residents #10, #23, #35, #38, #48, and #52). The facility census was 78. Review of the facility's Physician Services policy, undated showed the following: -All verbal treatment orders will be countersigned by the physician or other health care professional on the next visit to the facility; -The physician will sign and date all orders with the exception of influenza and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines, which may be administered per physician-approved facility policy after an assessment for contraindications; -A resident's attending physician may delegate the task of writing dietary orders, consistent with 483.60, to a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional who: a. Is acting within the scope of practice as defined by State law; b. Is under the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-07 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician visits were made by the physician and/or a physician assistant, nurse practitioner or clinical nurse at least every 30 days for six additional residents (Residents #10, #23, #35, #38, #48, and #52). The facility census was 78. Review of the facility's undated policy, Physician Services, showed the following: -A physician will approve in writing a recommendation that an individual be admitted to the facility; -A physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist must provide orders for the resident's immediate care and needs; -Each resident will remain under the care of a physician; -The physician will review the resident's total program of care, including medications and treatments, at each visit; -The physician will write, sign, and date progress notes at each visit; -The residents must be seen by a physician at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission, and at least once every 60…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff and/or utilize staff in a manner to complete bathing for seven residents (Resident #6, #21, #24, #25, #27, #125, and #61), answer call lights timely for two residents (Resident #16 and #51), and provide restorative nursing services as directed for one resident (Resident #76) in a review of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 78. 1. Review of Resident #6's care plan, dated 9/20/22, showed the resident was totally dependent on staff to provide a bath twice a week and as needed. Review of the resident's bathing documentation, dated September 2022, showed the following: -The resident received a shower on 9/2/22, 9/6/22, 9/9/22, and 9/13/22; -No documentation the resident received a shower on 9/14/22 through 9/19/22 (six days); -The resident received a shower on 9/20/22, 9/23/22, and 9/27/22; -No documentation the resident received a shower on 9/28/22 through 9/30/22. Review of the resident's bathing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. The facility census was 78. Review of the facility's payroll detail, dated 9/25/22, showed the Director of Nursing (DON)worked eight hours. The facility did not have documented evidence of hours worked by the DON because they are paid a salary and not hourly, the DON does not document start and stop times. No other RN's were on the payroll on 9/25/22. Review of the facility's payroll detail, dated 10/1/22-10/31/22, showed the following: -One day with no RN hours (10/1/22); -15 days with only salaried RN's, three of those days the DON was the RN; The facility did not have documented evidence of hours worked by the DON and salaried RN's because they are paid a salary and not hourly, they do not document start and stop times. Review of the facility's payroll detail, dated 11/1/22-11/27/22, showed the following: -One day with no RN hours documented (11/27/22); -Two days with less than eight RN hours; 11/18/22 showed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) on psychotropic medication or document a clinical justification to continue current dosage for three residents (Resident #3, #6, and #27), in a review of twenty sampled residents. The facility also failed to obtain a 14 day stop date on as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication for three sampled residents (Resident #3, #19, and #40), and did not provide documentation clinical reason to extend the PRN medications. The facility census was 78. Review of the facility ' s Medications-Antipsychotics policy, dated 11/1/22, showed the following: -Each resident receives only those medications, in doses and for the duration clinically indicated to treat the resident ' s assessed condition; -Non-pharmacological interventions (such as behavioral interventions) are considered and used when indicated, instead of, or in addition to, medication; -The Charge Nurse will monitor all use of antipsychotic medications on the unit; -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff washed their hands after each direct resident contact and failed to change gloves during direct resident personal care for two residents (Resident #6 and #19) of 20 sampled residents. The facility also failed to practice acceptable infection control practices and prevent cross-contamination during the provision of wound care for one resident (Resident #6) and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for one resident (Resident #30). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control was utilized for respiratory care supplies for two residents (Resident #3, and #21). The facility census was 78. Review of facility's Clean (Aseptic) Treatment Technique policy, dated 3/2021, showed the following: -Wash or sanitize hand per your policy; -Use a space that will give you enough room to work from, an over bed table is an ideal surface; -Locate the field close to the resident but away from the treatment cart;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pneumococcal vaccines (a vaccine that can protect against pneumococcal disease, which is any type of infection caused by streptococcus pneumoniae bacteria) for five residents (Resident #3, #12, #14, #21 and #25), in a review of 20 sampled residents, and for two additional residents (Residents #1 and #18). The census was 78. Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for pneumococcal vaccine timing, dated 4/1/22, showed the following: -CDC recommends pneumococcal vaccination for adults [AGE] years old or older, and for adults 19 through [AGE] years old with certain underlying medical conditions including cigarette smoking; -For adults who have never received a pneumococcal vaccine, or those with unknown vaccination history, one dose of PCV15 (15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine) or PCV20 (20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine) should be administered; -If PCV 20 is used, their pneumococcal vaccinations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that enhanced resident dignity and ensure full recognition of individuality for one resident (Resident #25), in a review of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 78. Review of the facility policy Resident Rights dated 11/1/22 showed the following: -Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect and dignity; -Federal and state last guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility; -Residents are entitled to exercise their rights and privileges to the fullest extent possible. Our facility will make every effort to assist each resident in exercising his or her rights to assure that the resident is always treated with respect, kindness, and dignity; 1. Review of Resident #25's care plan revised 10/4/22 showed the following: -The resident has an Activity of Daily Living (ADL) self care performance deficit; -Able to make needs known; -The resident requires assistance of one for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to advocate for and create an environment respectful of the rights of each resident to make choices about significant aspects of their lives for one resident under guardianship (Resident #37) in a review of 20 sampled residents. The facility enforced and encouraged restrictions from the guardian without rationale for the safety or well-being of the residents. The facility census was 78. Review of the facility policy Resident Rights dated 11/1/22 showed the following: -Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility; These rights include the resident's right to: -Privacy and confidentiality; -Privacy in sending and receiving mail; -Visit and be visited by other from outside the facility; -Use a telephone in privacy; -Retain and use personal possessions to the maximum extent that space and safety permit; -Residents are entitled to exercise their rights and privileges to the fullest extent possible. Our facility will make every effort to assist each resident in exercising his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-07 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #37), in a review of 20 sampled residents, was able to receive approved visitors. The resident was under guardianship. The facility failed to coordinate with the ombudsman and advocate for the resident, failed to update approved visitors on the resident's care plan, denied the resident visitation by approved visitors, and failed to communicate discrepancies about the resident's diagnosis affecting the guardian's decision/rationale to limit visitation. The census was 78. Review of the facility policy Resident Rights dated 11/1/22 showed the following: -Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility; These rights include the resident's right to: -Visit and be visited by other from outside the facility; -Residents are entitled to exercise their rights and privileges to the fullest extent possible. Our facility will make every effort to assist each resident in exercising…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #21), in a review of 20 sampled residents remained free from misappropriation of property, when the resident's cell phone came up missing and was presumed stolen. The facility census was 78. Review of the facility policy, Abuse, dated 11/1/22, showed the following: -Misappropriation definition: The deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belonging or money without the resident's consent; -The Human Resources department will ensure the facility does not employ individuals who have been found guilty of misappropriation of property, have had a finding entered into the state nurse aide registry concerning misappropriation of resident's property, have a disciplinary action in effect against his/her professional license by a state licensure body from a finding of misappropriation of resident property; -Supervisors will report all allegations to the Director of Nursing and the administrator; -The remainder of the policy is specifically related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to report misappropriation of resident's personal property to the state survey agency as required for one resident (Resident #21), in a review of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 78. Review of the undated facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, Grievance Procedures, showed the following: -Purpose: To outline procedures for reporting and investigating complaints of abuse, neglect, and misuse of funds/property, to define terms of types of abuse/neglect and misappropriation of funds and property, and to ensure that due process for appeals to the accused is outlined; -Purpose: To ensure immediate reporting of all abuse allegations to the administrator or designee and the Director of Nursing or designee and outside persons or agencies; -Purpose: To establish actions related to the alleged perpetrator and to ensure investigation and assessment of all residents involved is completed. The facility did not provide a specific policy related to reporting of misappropriation of resident's personal property. 1. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation to show a thorough investigation was completed after one resident's (Resident #21), in a review of 20 sampled residents, cell phone came up missing and was presumed stolen. The facility census was 78. Review of the undated facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, Grievance Procedures, showed the following: -Purpose: To establish actions related to the alleged perpetrator and to ensure investigation and assessment of all residents involved is completed. (The facility did not provide a specific procedures to follow when investigating an allegation of misappropriation of resident property.) 1. Review of Resident #21's face sheet showed the resident was his/her own decision maker. Record review of the resident's social service progress notes, dated 10/14/22 at 8:05 A.M. showed the following: -The resident gave concerns to the Ombudsman on 10/5/22; -Social Services Director did a follow-up with the resident -The resident was informed the facility will not be responsible for misuse of personal items. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete a comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) by 14 days after admission for one additionally sampled resident (Resident #176) out of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 78 Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, dated October 2019, showed the following: -The admission assessment is a comprehensive assessment for a new resident and, under some circumstances, a returning resident that must be completed by the end of day 14, counting the date of admission to the nursing home as day 1 if: a. This is the resident's first time in this facility, OR b. The resident has been admitted to this facility and was discharged return not anticipated, OR c. The resident has been admitted to this facility and was discharged return anticipated and did not return within 30 days of discharge. Review of Resident #176's face sheet showed he/she admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's electronic medical record on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-07 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan that accurately reflected the resident's needs to include instruction needed to provide effective and person-centered care within 48 hours of admission and give a written summary of the baseline care plan to the resident/resident representative for one sampled resident (Resident #59) of 20 sampled and one additional resident (Resident #176) . The facility census was 78. Review of the facility's General Care Planning Area policy, undated, showed the following: -Within 48 hours of admission to the facility, the facility must develop and implement a baseline care plan for the resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meets professional standards of care; -Include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident including, but not limited to: ·Physician orders; ·Dietary orders; ·Therapy services; ·Social Services; ·PASARR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative services to assist one resident (Resident #76) in a review of 20 sampled residents, with mobility and/or limited range of motion to attain or maintain their highest level of functioning. The facility census was 78. During an interview on 12/1/22, at 2:30 P.M., the Assistant Administrator said the facility did not have a policy for restorative nursing at this time. 1. Review of Resident #76's care plan dated 4/28/22 showed the following: -The resident is at risk for falls related to impaired safety awareness, intermittent muscle weakness; -Evaluate the need for restorative program as needed. Review of the resident's annual MDS dated [DATE] showed the following: -Moderately impaired cognition; -Required extensive assist of one for bed mobility and transfers; -Required limited assist of one for walking and locomotion on and off the unit; -Always incontinent of bladder; -Occasionally incontinent of bowel. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate use of a mechanical lift for one resident (Resident #6) out of a sample of 20 residents. The facility also failed to provide adequate supervision and oversight to prevent falls for one discharged resident, (Resident #76). The facility census was 78. Review of the facility's Transfers and Lifts policy, dated 11/1/22, showed the following: -For residents who are totally dependent or partial or non-weight bearing; -Must be used with two staff members; -Know weight limitations of the device; -Lock wheels of bed and lift before using; -Widen base of lift to transfer; -Apply sling properly and position it above shoulders and below buttocks; -Insert metal bars into the appropriate slots on the sling; -Make sure chain links are the appropriate lengths for the top and bottom; -Secure the resident's arms and legs so they don't hang out of the sling during transfers. (The policy did not address responsibilities of each staff during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove expired medication from the medication room refrigerator for one resident (Resident #405). The facility census was 78. Review of the facility policy, Medication Storage, revised 11/1/22, showed the following: -Medications will be monitored by the Unit Nurse, Charge Nurse, and consultant pharmacist to assure that they are not expired, contaminated, or unusable; -Medication Room and Medication Carts will be inspected weekly and as needed at the direction of the Director of Nursing. Review of the facility policy, titled Medication Destruction, revised 11/1/22, showed the following: -Non-controlled and scheduled V controlled drugs (drugs with lower potential for abuse)must be destroyed in the presence of two licensed nurses; -All medications will be destroyed in accordance with the Federal Guidelines to Proper Pharmaceutical Disposal; -Whoever witnesses the destruction/disposal of medications must sign and date the medication destruction record. 1. Record review of Resident #405's Physician Order Sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #62) with food allergies, including allergy to cinnamon, in a review of 20 sampled residents, was not served foods containing cinnamon. The facility census was 78. The facility did not have a policy on food allergies. Review of Resident #62's face sheet showed the following allergies: -Honey; -Seafood; -Spices. Review of the resident's Care Plan, revised on 8/12/22, showed the following: -Staff will honor his/her preferences while caring for resident; -Resident is at nutritional risk related to multiple food allergies; -Reported food allergies: Spices, egg yolk, honey, mustard, pork, seafood (tuna ok). -Offer substitutes for dislikes; -Offer resident alternative meal plan if noted to not be eating meal offered; -Provide and serve diet as ordered. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/26/22, showed the resident was cognitively intact and had no behaviors. During an interview on 11/29/22 at 3:50…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-05-02 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act promptly upon the grievances identified by the resident council, and failed to provide the members of the resident council with responses, actions and rationale taken regarding their concerns. The facility census was 51. 1. Review of the facility policy Resident Council revised 2/2016 showed the following: -The designated staff member of the facility is to assist and help coordinate the council meetings; -The resident council shall meet at least one time per month with the facility staff who shall provide assistance to the council in preparing and disseminating a report of each meeting (minutes) to all the residents, the administrator, and the facility staff; -The council may communicate to the administrator the opinions and concerns of the residents; -Any concerns identified in the resident council will cause a grievance form to be initiated in order to ensure that the concerns are addressed; -Grievance forms will be given to the appropriate follow up and response will be provided to the council. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for four residents (Resident #28, #33, #42 and #304) of 14 sampled residents and four additional residents (Resident #9, #20, #21 and #40). Staff failed to obtain and document daily weights for three residents (Resident #33, #40, and #42), administered medications out of the scheduled time frame for four residents (Resident #20, #21, #28 and #304), did not have medications available for administration for one resident (Resident #9), did not report one resident's (Resident #9) blood pressures to the physician when his/her systolic pressure (the amount of pressure in ones arteries during the contraction of the heart muscle) was below 100, did not administer eye drop medications with the proper technique or administer the correct amount of ophthalmic medication for one resident (Resident #20) and did not administer inhaled medications correctly to one resident (Resident #20). Registered Nurse (RN) S administered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 9. Review of Resident #47's face sheet showed diagnoses included high blood pressure, heart failure and major depressive disorder. Review of the resident's admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Makes self-understood and understands others; -BIMS 13 indicating intact cognition; -No behaviors of concern documented; -No neurological diagnoses; -Anxiety disorder and depression were the listed psychotic/mood disorders; -Anti-anxiety medications had been received three of the last seven days. Review of the resident's December 2018 POS showed an order dated 12/17/18 for lorazepam 0.5mg every eight hours PRN (anxiety) (open ended with no limitation on number of days). Review of the resident's December 2018 MAR showed the following: -Staff documented administering the resident's PRN lorazepam one time on 12/19/18, 12/21/18, 12/22/18 and 12/25/18; -Staff documented administering the resident's PRN lorazepam twice on 12/27/18, 12/29/18 and 12/30/18; -Staff documented administering the resident's PRN lorazepam…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to accurately label insulin to facilitate consideration of precautions and safe administration for three additional residents (Resident #18, #22 and #45) of 14 sampled residents and 14 additional residents. Facility census was 51. 1. Review of the facility policy titled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Facility staff should comply with facility policy, applicable law and the State Operations Manual when administering medications; -Facility staff should enter the date opened on the label of medications with shortened expiration dates (e.g., insulins, irrigation solutions, etc.); -Facility staff may record the expiration date based on date opened on the label of medications with shortened expiration dates; -During medication administration, facility staff should take all measures required by facility policy and applicable law, including, but not limited to the following: -Follow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food at an appetizing temperature. The facility census was 51. 1. Review of the facility dietary manual showed no policy regarding food temperatures at the time of meal service. 2. During an interview on 4/29/19 at 11:32 A.M. and 2:52 P.M., Resident #18 said the following: -He/She ate his/her meals in his/her room and they were always cold; -Meals were the only thing he/she had to look forward to, so it was disappointing when the food was cold; -Lunch was terrible and the corn was cold. During interview on 4/29/19at 122:49 P.M., Resident #47 said the following: -Staff delivered his/her meal trays to his/her room; -The food served at lunch that day was not hot, specifically the corn, and the mashed potatoes and gravy were just kind of warm. During interview on 04/29/19 at 4:02 P.M., Resident #49 said the following: -He/She usually ate in the dining room; -The food was lousy, and was always cold. During the resident council meeting on 04/30/19 at 11:01 A.M., residents said the following: -Eight of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff utilizedd appropriate infection control procedures when providing medication for two residents (Resident #28 and #304) and care to one resident (Resident #10) of 14 sampled residents and two additional residents (Resident #20 and #21) when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) J touched medication with his/her bare hands, did not don or use gloves with eye drop and nasal spray administration and did not properly wash his/her hands with soap and water or sanitize before and after resident contact. Further review showed Registered Nurse (RN) E, LPN F and LPN G did not utilize appropriate infection control procedures when providing cares for Resident #28. The census was 51. 1. Review of the facility policy titled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, dated 12/01/17, showed the following: -Facility staff should comply with facility policy, applicable law and the State Operations Manual when administering medications; -Prior to preparing or administering medications, authorized and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Residents #28 and #53), of 14 sampled residents received the necessary care and services during personal care. The facility census was 51. 1. Review of the Perineal Care policy, dated 2001 Med-Pass, Revised October 2010, showed the following: -Purpose: The purposes of this procedure are to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infections and skin irritation, and to observe the resident's skin condition; -Wash and dry your hands thoroughly; -Put on gloves; -Instruct the resident to bend his or her knees and put his or her feet flat on the mattress. Assist as necessary; -For a female resident: Wet washcloth and apply soap or skin cleansing agent; -Wash perineal area, wiping from front to back; -Separate labia and wash area downward from front to back. (Note: If the resident has an indwelling catheter, gently wash the juncture of the tubing from the urethra down the catheter about 3 inches. Gently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one additional resident (Resident #38) the necessary care and services to maintain his/her highest practicable well-being when staff failed to assess the resident with change of condition, obtain daily weights as ordered by the physician and notify the physician of the resident's change in condition including elevated blood pressure readings, new onset edema and weakness. The resident was transferred to the hospital on 4/28/19 with lethargy, fever and elevated blood pressure. The facility census was 51. 1. Review of the undated facility policy Significant Condition Change & Notification showed the following: Purpose: To ensure that the resident's family and/or representative and medical practitioner are notified of resident changes such as those listed below: -An accident or incident, with or without injury, that has the potential for needed medical practitioner intervention; -A significant change in the resident's physical, mental or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide necessary treatment and services consistent with standards of practice to promote healing of a new pressure ulcer (a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and /or friction) for one resident (Resident #8), who had a pressure ulcer, and the facility identified at risk for the development of pressure ulcers in a review of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 51. 1. Review of the facility's Wound Care System Requirements policy, revised April 2018, showed the following: -The facility has a designated Wound Care Nurse, who completes weekly assessment and documentation; -Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) will observe skin during care daily. Any changes will be reported to the licensed nurse for follow up; -Weekly wound assessment is being completed, with individual documentation; -A pressure ulcer/pressure injury worksheet will be completed each time an in house acquired pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe transfer during a mechanical lift transfer for one resident (Resident #53), in a review of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 51. 1. Review of the Nurse Assistant in Long-Term Care Facility Student Reference, 2001 revision, showed the following: -Mechanical lift is a device used to lift and move residents who are unable to do so on their own; -If a resident is non-weight bearing, the nurse assistant should transfer him/her using a mechanical lift; -Follow manufacturer's directions regarding safe use. 2. Review of a facility policy, titled Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents, showed the following: -Resident safety, dignity, comfort and medical condition will be incorporated into goals and decisions regarding the safe lifting and moving of residents; -Manual lifting of residents shall be eliminated when feasible; -Staff responsible for direct resident care will be trained in the use of manual (gait/transfer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services consistent with acceptable standards of practice to prevent a urinary tract infection (UTI) for one residents (Resident #8), who currently had or had a UTI and required antibiotics for treatment, in a review of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 51. 1. Review of the Perineal Care policy, dated 2001 Med-Pass, Revised October 2010, showed the following: -Purpose: The purposes of this procedure are to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infections and skin irritation, and to observe the resident's skin condition; -Wash and dry your hands thoroughly; -Put on gloves; -Instruct the resident to bend his or her knees and put his or her feet flat on the mattress. Assist as necessary; -For a female resident: Wet washcloth and apply soap or skin cleansing agent; -Wash perineal area, wiping from front to back; -Separate labia and wash area downward from front to back. (Note: If the resident has an indwelling catheter, gently wash the juncture…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-11-27 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post the results of the most recent survey and complaint investigations in a place readily accessible to all residents. The facility also failed to keep the survey binder up to date with all survey and complaint investigation results. The facility census was 87. Review of the facility undated policy, admission Contract and Authorization for Treatment, showed the following: -Examination or survey results, resident has the right to examine the results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility; -The results must be made available by the facility in a place readily accessible to the residents and the facility must post a notice of their availability. 1. During the resident council meeting on 11/20/24 at 2:21 P.M., seven of eight residents in attendance said they were not aware they could see the results of the annual inspections/surveys or any complaint investigation. They did not know where the book with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-11-27 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer to the resident and/or the resident's representative and failed to notify the State Ombudsman when three residents (Residents #242, #33 and #31), in a review of 20 sampled residents, and one additional resident (Resident #68) were transferred to the hospital. The facility census was 87. The facility did not provide a policy addressing written notification to the resident, the resident representative and the State Ombudsman when a resident was transferred to the hospital. 1. Review of Resident #68's face sheet showed the resident's family member was his/her responsible party. Review of the resident's Nurses Notes, dated 11/16/24, showed the following: -The resident complained of chest, neck and heel pain and wanted transferred to the hospital; -Physician notified of resident's pain; -Orders received to send the resident to the emergency room for evaluation via ambulance. Review of the resident's census sheet showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-11-27 · tag F0625 — widespread
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of the bed hold policy with required information to the resident and/or resident representative at the time of transfer to the hospital for three residents (Residents #242, #33, and #31), in a review of 20 sampled residents, and one additional resident (Resident #68). The facility census was 87. A request for a facility Bed Hold Policy was made but the facility was unable to provide a policy. 1. Review of Resident #242's face sheet showed the resident had a guardian who was his/her responsible party. Review of the resident's progress note, dated 05/25/24 at 10:39 P.M., showed the following: -The resident stated he/she had tried to strangulate him/herself but the string broke from his/her sweat pants; -He/She stated he/she did not want to live anymore; -The resident's guardian was notified and permission was given to send the resident to the hospital for an evaluation; -The Director of Nursing (DON), and the primary care Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-11-27 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to electronically submit to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), a complete and accurate direct care staffing information to the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) data from April 1, 2024 through June 30, 2024. The facility census was 87. The facility provided no policy regarding PBJ upon request. 1. Review of the CMS PBJ Staffing Data Report, dated 11/12/24, showed no staffing data reported for the period of April 1, 2024 through June 30, 2024. During an interview on 11/20/24 at 11:00 A.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) said she was new to the facility. She was not employed during the reporting time on the report (when data submission was due for April 1, 2024 through June 30, 2024). Since starting at the facility she has had difficulty signing into the system and missed a deadline to submit PBJ data. During an interview on 11/20/24 at 11:11 A.M., Administrator #1 said it was the BOM's responsibility to submit PBJ data. He was not sure when PBJ data was submitted and when it was not. There had been turnover in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-11-27 · tag F0620 — pattern
    Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and provide an admission agreement to one resident's (Residents #241's), guardian upon the resident's admission to the facility, in a review of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 87. Review of the undated facility admission packet showed the following: -admission contract and authorization for treatment: The admission contract and authorization for treatment (contract) is made and entered into on this (date of admission) between (Resident) and the facility, a secured long term care facility with secured/locked unit for special needs residents; -Payment agreement sections to include: Private pay resident, Medicare resident, Medicaid resident, and third party payor; -Resident responsibilities; -Facility responsibilities; -Arbitration of disputes; -Agreements and acknowledgements included: Attachment A. admission policy; Attachment B. Ancillary charges; Attachment C. Responsibility for payment; Attachment D. Facility rules and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-11-27 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation to show staff clearly explained the binding arbitration agreement process (a private process where disputing parties agree that one or several individuals can make decisions about the dispute after receiving evidence and hearing arguments) to two residents (Residents #44 and #241), in a review of 20 sampled residents, and two additional residents (Residents #4 and #46). The facility census was 87. During an interview on 11/25/24 at 2:46 P.M., the Administrator 1 said the facility did not have a policy for binding arbitration agreements. Review of the undated facility admission packet showed the following: -Arbitration of Dispute: The parties understand that any dispute under this contract will be determined by submission to arbitration as provided by Missouri law, and not by a lawsuit or resort to court process except as Missouri law provides for judicial review of arbitration proceedings. The parties understand that they would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2022-12-07 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer/discharge to the resident and/or the resident representative or notify the ombudsman when three residents (Residents #36, #37, and #63), in a review of 20 sampled residents, were transferred to the hospital. The facility census was 78. The facility was unable to provide a policy related to this requirement. 1. Review of Resident #37's face sheet showed the resident was under guardianship. Review of the resident's Nurses Notes, dated 5/22/22, showed the following: -The resident had a fever of 101.6 (normal 98.6 degreesFahrenheitt); -History of rapid decline; -On-call physician gave orders to send to the resident to the emergency room via ambulance service. Review of the resident's census sheet, dated 7/18/22, showed the resident was transferred to the hospital. Review of the resident's Nurses Notes, dated 7/20/22, showed thefacility receivedd a call from the hospital reporting they were unable to complete the surgery…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2022-12-07 · tag F0625 — widespread
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of bed hold with required information to the resident and/or resident representative when the facility initiated a transfer to the hospital for three residents (Residents #36, #37, and #63), in a review of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 78. During an interview on 12/1/22, at 1:30 P.M., the Administrative Assistant said there was bed hold information in the admission packet, the facility did not have a bed hold policy related to transfers and discharges. 1. Review of Resident #37's face sheet showed he/she was under guardianship. Review of the resident's Nurses Notes, dated 5/22/22, showed the following: -The resident had a fever of 101.6 (normal 98.6degrees Fahrenheitt); -History of rapid decline; -On call physician gave orders to send to emergency room via ambulance service. Review of the resident's census sheet, dated 7/18/22, showed the resident transferred to the hospital. Review of the resident's Nurses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-12-07 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to post the census, Registered Nurse (RN) hours, total hours worked by other nursing staff (Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA), Certified Medication Technician (CMT), and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)), with the name of the facility. The facility census was 78. Review of the facility's staffing posting documents, dated 11/1/22-11/27/222, showed the following: -No evidence of RN hours noted; -No hour totals for CNA's, CMT's, or LPN's; -No facility name or census. Observation on 11/28/22, at 11:45 A.M., showed the following: -Staffing posted at the nurses desk bulletin board; -The RN area was blank; -The staff hours were not totaled (CNA's, CMT's, or LPN's); -Did not include the name of the facility or the census. Observation on 11/29/22, at 9:34 A.M., showed the following: -Staffing posted at the nurses desk bulletin board; -The RN area was blank; -The staff hours were not totaled (CNA's, CMT's, or LPN's); -Did not include the name of the facility or the census. During an interview on 11/30/22, at 9:42 A.M., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$279,380 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $17,011 — penalty dated 2025-04-04
  • $175,201 — penalty dated 2024-11-27
  • $87,168 — penalty dated 2024-03-28
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-01-18 for 58 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-28 for 89 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SPEED, HYMITAIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/27/2022
WILLIAMS, DEBRAIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2022
WILLIAMS, HYMITAIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2022
WILLIAMS, JOSHUAIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2022
WILLIAMS, KAYLONIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/27/2022
WILLIAMS, MICAHIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/27/2022
CHAPPLE, CHASITYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
JONES, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/03/2025
WILLIAMS, WENTRICIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/03/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$495K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 83%Medicare 6%Other / private 11%

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $495K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$224per resident / day
operating cost
$6,814per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$200per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265462. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next