No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Golden Years Center For Rehab And Healthcare

2001 Jefferson Parkway, Harrisonville, MO 64701 · For profit - Corporation · 128 certified beds · (816) 380-4731 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0567, F0568)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0741, F0758)3 immediate-jeopardy citations$166,800 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568)
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (74) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $166,800 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-14)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (71%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
305 W Wall St Ste A · (816) 793-0071 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
300 S Commercial St · (816) 380-6566 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Walmart0.9 mi
1700 N State Route 291 · (816) 884-5635 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1500 S Jefferson Pkwy · (816) 380-8980 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.0%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.4%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.9%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.6%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.3%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%4.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.6%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.3%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.8%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.0%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.1%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.0%63.5%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.3%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.5%13.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.962.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.072.331.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.4%CMS range 42.9–64.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 6.2–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified58.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay10.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.0–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.101.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.18
RN hours/ resident / day
0.94
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.50
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.62
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
70.6%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 64.4 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 64 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-30)
27
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-22)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

74 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 60 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-10-29 · tag F0742 — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and behavioral health services for three sampled residents (Resident #4, Resident #7, and Resident #3) who had known behavioral health history and mental health diagnoses. The facility staff failed to implement a PASRR for Resident #4 and failed to create a plan of care for Resident #3 and Resident #4 to provide interventions for behaviors. The facility failed to transcribe, order, and administer Resident #4's psychotropic medications from [DATE] - [DATE] followed by an escalation of aggressive behaviors. The facility staff also failed to implement Resident #7's PASRR to create a plan of care for his/her known self-harming behavior suicidal ideation which resulted in the resident experiencing increased agitation and reporting thoughts of suicidal ideation and an elopement from the facility. Twelve residents were selected for sample. The census was 90.The Administrator was notified on [DATE] at 12:40 P.M. of the Immediate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet the medical needs of two of three sampled residents (Resident #12 and Resident #4). On 10/15/2025, Resident #12 admitted to the facility with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and post operative right renal kidney transplant. The facility failed to give the resident their ordered anti-rejection medication, failed to provide wound care for their surgical wound for two and a half days, and failed to notify the resident's physician and transplant physician of the missed medications and wound care. The resident admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with an undetectable amount of anti-rejection medication and sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection) and an infected necrotic (dead tissue) post operative abdominal wound- requiring IV (intravenous) antibiotics to treat the infection and multiple surgeries. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's psychotropic medications were reconciled from discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident #12) was free from a significant medication error. The facility failed to order and administer Resident #12's antirejection medication after the resident admitted to the facility post kidney transplant. Resident #12 did not receive ordered medications for immunosuppression (a state in which the body immune system is weekend and less effective in fighting infection) on 10/15/25 and 10/16/25. The resident admitted back to the hospital with an undetectable amount of the anti-rejection medication in his/her bloodwork and with potential rejection of the transplant organ and sepsis (a life-threatening condition that happens when the body's immune system has an extreme response to an infection, causing organ dysfunction). The facility census was 90 residents.The Administrator was notified on 10/23/25 at 12:40 P.M. of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 10/3/25. The IJ was removed on 10/26/25, as confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-10-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two sampled residents (Resident #5 and Resident #6) were free from physical abuse when Resident #4 verbally abused and attempted to physically abuse Resident #5 which caused the resident to fall and resulted in feelings of embarrassment and humiliation for Resident #5. In addition, Resident #4 physically abused Resident #6 which caused Resident #6 pain and the need to be sent to the hospital for evaluation. Thirteen residents were sampled. The facility census was 90. Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, revised 6/30/25, showed:-It was the policy of the facility to provide protection for the health welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property.-Abuse meant the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs-fundamental self-care tasks like bathing or eating) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene by failing to ensure bathing was completed and documented according to the residents individual preference and facility policy for four sampled residents (Resident #2, #3, #4, and #5) out of six sampled resident's. The facility census was 62 residents.Review of the facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) Policy revised 5/16/25, showed:-The facility would, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs did not deteriorate unless deterioration was unavoidable.-Care and services would be provided for the following activities of daily living:--Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care.--Transfer and ambulation.--Toileting.--Eating to include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents' medical records were complete and accurate for four sampled residents (Resident #2, #3, #4, and #5) out of six sampled residents, when on 5/1/26 the Director of Nursing (DON) advised Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) B and CNA C to retroactively complete and sign Skin Monitoring: Comprehensive CNA shower sheets for prior dates. The facility census was 62 residents. Review of the facility's Documentation in Medical Record Policy revised 6/6/25, showed:-Each resident's medical record would contain an accurate representation of the actual experiences of the resident and include enough information to provide a picture of the resident's progress through complete, accurate, and timely documentation.-Licensed staff and interdisciplinary team members shall document all assessments, observations, and services provided in the resident's medical record in accordance with state law and facility policy.-Documentation shall be completed at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the inside laundry wall on the parking lot side in good repair to prevent water from entering the laundry area and failed to prevent the growth of moldlike substance on the laundry wall. This practice affected one non-resident use area. The facility census was 62 residents.1. Observation with the Administrator and the Maintenance Person on 5/1/25 at 10:57 A.M., showed:-An area of the wall that was 8 feet (ft.) 7 inches (in.) high by 15 ft. wide that was covered in a moldlike substance.-One area behind a large stainless-steel sink with the presence of a moldlike substance on the wall that was 14 in. high by 4 ft. wide. During an interview on 5/125 at 11:03 A.M., Laundry Aide (LA) A said:-He/she has worked at the facility as a Laundry Aide for six years.-He/she has not seen any moldlike substances in the laundry area.-He/she has not seen standing water in the basement. During an interview on 5/1/26 at 11:26 A.M., the Maintenance Person said he/she noticed the moldlike substance on the wall and said he/she could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0836 — isolated
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility van used to transport residents to appointments was currently licensed. The facility census was 62 residents. Review of the facility's policy dated [DATE], Transporting a Resident - Facility Van showed:-It is the policy of this facility to provide residents safe, non-emergency transportation to physician's appointments, activity outings, and any other trips the faculty deems necessary.-The van would be well maintained. -Facility liability and insurance would have covered staff transportation of residents. 1. Review of emails between the Administrative Team at the facility and the parent company showed:-On [DATE] needing to register the van. The license plates expires on Friday. Will need the title and a bill of sale to do this.-On [DATE] Are you able to track down the van title.-On [DATE] The parent company said: Have we received the needed titles yet? To be in compliance with the law, we need to be able to register our…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep the walk-in freezer floors clean; failed to ensure food preparation equipment were kept in a sanitary condition; failed to maintain plastic cutting boards and plate covers in good condition to avoid food safety hazards (cross-contamination); and failed to separate damaged foodstuffs, in accordance with State of Missouri rules and regulations, established national guidelines, and professional standards for food service safety. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who ate food from the kitchen. The facility's census was 67 residents with a licensed capacity for 119 residents at the time of the survey. 1. Observation on 1/21/26 between 12:29 P.M. and 12:43 P.M. during the initial kitchen inspection with the Dietary Manager (DM) showed the following:-The white and green cutting boards were excessively scored to the point of shedding small plastic particles.-A microwave had spills, splatters, and food debris inside on its rotating plate, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain a comprehensive, facility-specific infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of Legionella (A [NAME] of pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria that includes the species L. pneumophila, causing legionellosis, all illnesses caused by Legionella, including a pneumonia-type illness called Legionnaires' disease and a mild flu-like illness called Pontiac fever) and/or other water-borne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease) that included specific assessments and contents, in accordance with State of Missouri rules and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) standards and guidelines. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who resided, visited, used, or worked in the facility. The facility census was 67 residents with a licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure smoking assessments were completed in a timely manner to ensure resident safety for three sampled residents (Resident #20, #65, and #4) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Smoking dated 6/10/25 showed:-All residents would be asked about tobacco use during the admission process, and during each quarterly or comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning) assessment process.-Residents who smoked would be further assessed to determine whether supervision was required for smoking, or if a resident was safe to smoke at all.-If a resident who smoked experienced any decline in condition or cognition. He/she would be reassessed for ability to smoke independently and/or to evaluate whether any additional safety measures were indicated. 1. Review of Resident #20's care plan dated 7/2/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post the facility census and actual hours worked for Registered Nurses (RN's), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), Certified Medication Technicians (CMTs) and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) directly responsible for resident care per shift and to update the posting as necessary for view by residents, family members and visitors. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility Nurse Staffing Posting Information policy dated 5/13/2025 showed:-The Nurse Staffing Sheet would be posted on as daily basis and would contain the facility census, the total number and the actual hours worked for licensed and unlicensed nursing staff responsible for resident care per shift.-The facility would post the Nurse Staffing Sheet at the beginning of each shift. -After the start of each shift, the information posted would reflect staff absences and actual hours worked would be updated.Observation on 1/21/26, 1/22/26, 1/27/26, 1/28/26 and 1/29/26 of the posting of staffing showed it did not include the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a drug regimen review (DRR) was completed monthly for four sampled residents (Resident #7, #10, #6, and #69) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of facility policy entitle Quality Reporting: Drug Regimen Review revised 6/30/25 showed:-It was the policy of this facility document whether a drug regimen review was conducted upon a residents Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Prospective Payment System (PPS) admission and throughout the resident's stay, and to document whether any clinically significant medication issues identified were addressed in a timely manner. -Documentation of a drug regimen review may be located in various locations throughout the medical record. Examples included, but were not limited to:-- A nurse might have documented the review in nurses' notes or on a designated form.--A pharmacist might have documented the review in a designated location such as a medication regimen review form. --A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication administration error rate was less than five percent (5%) when staff failed to prime the insulin pen needles prior to administering Insulin for three sampled residents (Residents #27, #61 and #56) out of three sampled residents observed for Insulin administration resulting in a medication error rate of 11.54%. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility Insulin Pen policy dated 5/16/2025 showed:-The facility would use Insulin pens to improve accuracy of insulin dosing.-A new needle would be used for each injection.-Insulin pens would be primed prior to each use to avoid collection of air in the Insulin reservoir.-Attach the needle to the Insulin pen.-Remove the outer cover from the pen needle.-Dial two (2) units of Insulin by turning the dose selector to clockwise to 2 units.-With the needle pointing up, push the plunger and watch that at least one drop of Insulin appears on the tip of the needle, if not, repeat until at least one drop of Insulin appears.-Then set the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 60 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident's (Resident #44) rights remained intact when he/she had to move to a different room out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights dated 6/10/25 showed Information about resident rights and responsibilities would be given to the resident both orally and in writing.1. Review of Resident #44's admission Record showed he/she admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included:-Unspecified Dementia (a progressive organic mental disorder characterized by chronic personality disintegration, confusion, disorientation, stupor, deterioration of intellectual capacity and function, and impairment of control of memory, judgement, and impulses), Unspecified Severity, Without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance.-Anxiety (any group of mental conditions characterized by excessive fear of or apprehension about real or perceived threats).Review of the resident's care plan dated 1/7/26 showed:-The resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation of non-pharmacological behavioral interventions were attempted prior to administering pro re nata (PRN as needed ) antianxiety medication (medication to address the symptoms of anxiety); to document events/triggers preceding behaviors; to ensure the PRN antianxiety medication had a stop date; and failed to include comprehensive symptoms and/or target behaviors and individualized interventions for one sampled resident (Resident #12) who was taking multiple psychotropic medications (drugs which affect psychic function, behavior, or experience) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's Behavioral Health Services policy, revised 6/10/25 showed:-The facility utilizes the comprehensive assessment process for identifying and assessing a resident's mental and psychosocial status and providing person-centered care. -Staff will share concerns with the interdisciplinary team (IDT)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two sampled residents (Resident #44 and #75) physician's orders were followed out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. A policy related to following physician orders was requested and not received prior to exit on 1/20/26.1. Review of Resident #44's admission Record showed he/she was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses:-Retention of Urine (the inability to completely empty your bladder), Unspecified.-Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder (occurs when nerve damage disrupts the brain-bladder communication, causing problems with storage or emptying), Unspecified.Review of the resident's Order Summary Report dated December 2025 showed:-The resident had an order for a Urinary Analysis (UA- a test of your urine that checks and screens for diagnoses such as a UTI), ordered on 12/16/25.--The status of the order showed it had been completed.-The resident had an order for a UA to be completed between 12/21/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident's (Resident #13) gastrostomy tube (also known as G-tube, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/PEG tube/feeding tube - a flexible tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach that is used to give medications, fluids and liquid food) placement was confirmed prior to administration of medication in accordance with facility policy and current professional standards of practice. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK593216/ the National Institutes of Health, National Library of Medicine, Enteral (also known as tube feeding) Tube Management, dated 2021 showed:-The placement of an enteral tube is immediately verified after insertion by an X-ray; after X-ray verification, the tube should be marked to indicate the point on the tube where the feeding tube penetrates the abdominal wall; the mark or number on the tube at the entry point should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident's (Resident #13) tracheostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening (stoma) through the neck into the trachea (windpipe), to provide a direct airway) suctioning supplies were stored appropriately and that staff were trained and competent in the correct method of suctioning out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Tracheostomy (trach) Care dated 6/10/25 showed:-The facility would provide necessary respiratory care and services, such as oxygen therapy, treatments, tracheostomy care and/or suction.-Tracheostomy care would be provided according to physician's orders, comprehensive assessment, and individualized care plan such as monitoring for resident specific risks for possible complications, psychosocial needs, as well as suctioning as appropriate.-General considerations included maintaining a suction machine, a supply of suction catheters (a thin, flexible tube used to remove bodily fluids from a resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure orders were clarified for one sampled resident (Resident #7), who was receiving hemodialysis (a process of cleansing the blood of wastes, toxins and excess fluid by passing it through a special machine - necessary when the kidneys were not able to filter the blood), out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's Hemodialysis policy, dated 5/2/25, showed:-The facility will assure each resident receives care and services for the provision of hemodialysis consistent with professional standards of practice. This will include ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services.-The facility will ensure the physician's orders for dialysis include the location and type of access for dialysis (e.g. graft (uses a surgically implanted tube to connect an artery to a vein for hemodialysis access), arteriovenous shunt (directly connects the patient's artery and vein for hemodialysis access), external catheter (soft…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with one sampled resident (Resident #6) who experienced past trauma, to identify triggers which may re-traumatize the resident and develop care plan interventions to decrease the resident's exposure to triggers and to minimize the effect of the trigger on the resident out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's Trauma Informed Care (TIC) policy, dated 6/10/25, showed:-The facility will use a multi-pronged approach to identifying a resident's history of trauma, as well as their cultural preferences. This will include asking the resident about triggers that may be stressors or may prompt recall of a previous traumatic event as well as using screening and assessment tools.-The facility will collaborate with residents, and as appropriate, their family, friends, physician, and other health care and mental health professionals to develop individualized care plan interventions.-In some cases, if the facility has more than one trauma survivor, as appropriate, social…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-29 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — pattern
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff had appropriate competencies and skills to manage resident behaviors. The facility failed to provide education to employees related to behaviors and de-escalation including handling verbal and physical outbursts/aggression, suicidal ideation, refusal of antipsychotic medications, and destruction of the environment. Staff reported no knowledge of how to properly and safely care for Resident #4, Resident #7, or Resident #3. Staff stated they were fearful and did not feel competent to care for the residents' safely, and felt they could not keep themselves or other residents safe. The facility census was 90.Review of the facility's Nurse Aide Training Program policy, revised [DATE], showed:-The policy ensured that the facility maintained an appropriate and effective nurse aid in service training program for the purpose of ensuring the continuing competencies of nurse aids.-Each nurse aide would be provided with at least 12 hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-29 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was respected when a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) called one sampled resident (Resident #13) dumb out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 90 residents.Review of facility policy entitled Resident Rights, revised 6/10/25, showed: -All residents will be treated equally regardless of age, race, ethnicity, religion, culture, language, physical or mental disability, socioeconomic status, sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression. -The facility will ensure that all direct care and indirect care staff members, including contractors and volunteers, are educated on the rights of residents and the responsibility of the facility to properly care for its residents. Training topics will be appropriate to the individual's role. 1. Review of Resident #13's admission record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of LPN D's witness statement, dated 10/28/25, showed: -The resident asked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week. In addition, the facility failed to provide a Director of Nursing (DON) for 40 hours per week. The facility census was 73 residents. Review of the facility policy titled Director of Nursing Services, with no date, showed:-The nursing services department was under the direct supervision of a Registered Nurse (RN).-The nursing services department was managed by the Director of Nursing services. The Director was a Registered nurse, licensed by the state, and had experience in nursing service administration, rehabilitative and geriatric nursing.-The Director was employed full time, 40 hours per week. Review of the facility policy titled Registered Nurse, with no date, showed:-The facility would employ the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight (8) consecutive hours a day, seven (7) days a week.-The facility would designate a Registered Nurse to serve as the Director of Nursing (DON) on a full-time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility adhered to all the applicable components of the process for discharging a resident which included reassessment and the identification of how the facility could not meet the needs for one sampled resident (Resident #2). The facility census was 73 residents.Review of the facility Transfer or Discharge, Emergency Policy with no date, showed:-Residents would not be transferred unless the transfer or discharge was necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs could not be met at the facility.-Residents would not be transferred unless the transfer or discharge was appropriate because the resident's health improved sufficiently so the resident no longer needed the services provided by the facility.-Residents would not be transferred unless the safety of individuals in the facility was in danger due to the clinical or behavioral status of the resident.-Should it be necessary to make an emergency transfer or discharge to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure procedures were in place and followed in order to ensure physician notification was completed and documented regarding missed medications for two sampled residents (Residents #1, #2) out of four sampled residents, and failed to ensure blood pressure monitoring was completed for one resident with a physician's order to administer medication based on the resident's blood pressure (Resident #1). The facility census was 76 residents. Review of the facility Medication Administration Policy dated December 2012 showed: -Medications must be administered in accordance with physician orders. -For residents not in their room or otherwise unavailable to receive medication, the MAR may be flagged (identified for further attention) and the nurse will return to administration of the medication at a later time. -If a medication is withheld, refused or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication shall circle and initial the MAR for that drug and dose. -The individual administering must…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure and document measurement of the resident's gastrostomy tube (G-tube/PEG tube, a flexible tube inserted into the stomach through a small incision in the abdominal wall that provides a direct route for administering food, fluids, and medications ) to ensure correct placement in the resident's stomach prior to giving fluids, medications and feedings for two sampled residents (Residents #1 and #4) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 76 residents. A policy for administration of medication via G-tube was requested and not received. Review of https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK593216/ the National Institutes of Health, National Library of Medicine, Enteral (also known as tube feeding) Tube Management, dated 2021 showed: -The placement of an enteral tube is immediately verified after insertion by an X-ray; after X-ray verification, the tube should be marked to indicate the point on the tube where the feeding tube penetrates the abdominal wall; the mark or number on the tube at the entry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the floors under and behind the ice-machine free of debris; failed to ensure that items which were labeled refrigerate after opening, were refrigerated; failed to wrap a bowl of pureed pineapple in the kitchen reach-in refrigerator; failed to ensure the fan vent cover in the walk-in refrigerator, was free of dust; failed to label items (syrup and vinegar) with what they were in the containers those items were in; failed to ensure three cutting boards were free from stains and numerous grooves which caused those cutting boards to not be easily cleanable; failed to ensure the spatulas were maintained in an easily cleanable condition; failed to maintain the wall behind the dishwasher free of black colored debris; failed to maintain the floor under the six-burner stove free of debris; failed to maintain the cover of the blower over the door across from the coffee maker station, free from a heavy buildup of dust, and failed to maintain the sprinkler heads free from a grease. This practice potentially affected all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-22 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required nurse aide in-services that included dementia (progressive loss of intellectual functioning, with impairment of memory, abstract thinking, and personality change, resulting from disease of the brain) and Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation training for three sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) (CNA B, H and J) from April 2023 through April 2024. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's In-Service Training Program, Nurse Aide Policy, dated December 2016, showed: -All nurse aide personnel participated in regularly scheduled in-services training classes. -All personnel were required to attend regularly scheduled in-service training classes. -In-service training was based on the outcome of the annual performance reviews, which addressed weaknesses identified in the reviews. -Annual in-services included: --Continued competence of nurse aides. --No less than 12 hours per employee per employment year. --Address the special needs of the residents, as determined by facility staff. --Included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who allowed the facility to manage their resident funds, received interest payments and failed to ensure signed authorization forms were present for three residents (Residents #11, #32 and #1) selected for the resident trust review. The facility census was 67 residents. 1. Review of the reconciled bank statements, dated April 2023 through March 2024, showed the absence of any interest payments on the any of the bank statements. During an interview on 4/18/24 at 10:55 A.M. the Corporate Director of Fiscal Services said: -He/she did not see any interest on the bank statements. -He/she was not aware of any changes made to the account. 2. Review of Resident #11's authorization records showed there was no authorization form to manage funds found for the resident. 3. Review of Resident #32's authorization records showed there was no authorization form to manage funds found for the resident. 4. Review of Resident #1's authorization records showed there was no authorization form to manage funds found for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the water at the handwashing faucet in resident rooms 517, 520 and 523 at a temperature at or above 105 ºF (degrees Fahrenheit); failed to maintain sprinkler heads over the the therapy area, the Main Dining Room (MDR) and the side Dining room without dust; and failed to maintain two stand up lifts without cracks in the base of those lifts. This practice potentially affected at least 30 residents who resided in those areas, used those area or required assistance of the stand-up lifts. The facility census was 67 residents. 1. Observation on 4/16/24 with the Maintenance Director, showed: -At 9:06 A.M., the water temperature at the handwashing sink in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], was 97.2 ºF after the water was allowed to run for two minutes in that room. -At 9:23 A.M., the water temperature at the handwashing sink in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], was 88.8 ºF after the water was allowed to run for two minutes or more. -At 9:25 A.M., the water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-22 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the ombudsman (a resident advocate who provides support and assistance with problems and/or complaints regarding the facility) of the resident discharges/transfers for two sampled residents (Residents #48 and #23) and one supplemental resident (Resident #268) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Transfer and Discharge) showed the policy did not include notification of the ombudsman when residents were transferred or discharged . 1. Review of Resident #48's health status note dated 3/16/24 at 6:56 A.M. showed the resident was sent to the hospital due to seizures. Review of the resident's admission summary showed the resident returned to the facility on 3/23/24. Review of an email dated 4/8/24 from the ombudsman showed the ombudsman reported not receiving transfer/discharge logs from the facility since September 2023. 2. Review of Resident #23's discharge assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident's (Resident #2) care plan (written out plan for the care of the resident) reflected the resident's need to receive Physical Therapy (PT), Occupational Therapy (OT), and Speech Therapy (ST); out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Record review of the facility's Goals and Objectives, Care Plans policy dated April 2009 showed: -Care plans shall incorporate goals and objectives that lead to the resident's highest obtainable level of independence. -Care plan goals and objectives are defined as the desired outcome for a specific resident problem. -When goals and objectives are not achieved, the resident's clinical record will be documented as to why the results were not achieved and what new goals and objectives have been established. Care plans will be modified accordingly. -Care plan goals and objectives are derived from information contained in the resident's comprehensive assessment and: --Are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update residents' care plans with a change of condition and/or needs for five sampled residents (Residents #65, #41, #13, #19, and #52) and to invite a resident to his/her care plan meeting for one sample resident (Resident #37) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's Goals and Objectives, Care Plans policy dated April 2009, showed: -Care plans incorporated goals and objectives that led to the resident's highest obtainable level of independence. -Goals and objectives were entered on the resident's care plan so all disciplines had access to needed information and were able to report if the desired outcomes were being achieved. -Goals and objectives were reviewed and revised when: --The resident had a significant change. --When the outcome was not achieved. --At least quarterly. 1. Review of Resident #65's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-22 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have an activity program directed by a qualified Activity Director. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's undated Activity Director job description showed the following requirements: -High school diploma or General Educational Development (GED). -Two years experience in a social or recreational program within the last five years, one of which was full-time in a patient activities program in a health care setting; or a qualified occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant; or must have completed a training course approved by the state. 1. During an interview on 4/22/24 8:59 A.M., Activity Director/Human Resources/Medical Records said: -He/She was in school now, getting an associate degree in human resources. -He/She had not had any training in activities. -He/She had not taken the Activity Director class. During an interview on 4/22/24 at 11:34 A.M., the Activity Director/Human Resources/Medical Records said:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Restorative Aide (RA-Assist residents with exercises designed by rehabilitation staff to help improve the use of limbs and body functions) services were provided as ordered to prevent further decline of Range of Motion (ROM - the range on which a joint can move) in accordance with therapy recommendations to for three sampled residents (Resident #2, #61, and #37) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's policy, Restorative Nursing Services, dated July 2017 showed: -Residents would have received restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence. -Restorative nursing care consists of nursing interventions that may or may not be accompanied by formalized rehabilitative services. -Residents may have been started on a restorative nursing program upon admission, or during the course of stay or when discharged from rehabilitative care. -Restorative goals and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed weekly and stored in sanitary condition with the date it was changed written on it for two sampled residents, (Residents #268 and #17); to ensure a nebulizer (machine that converts medications into a mist to be inhaled by a patient) masks/pipes and tubing were cleaned, and stored in a sanitary condition for three sampled residents (Residents #33, #268, and #267) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. A policy was requested and not received at the time of exit. 1. Review of Resident #33's face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a group of lung diseases that block air flow and make it difficult to breathe). Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by the facility for care planning) dated 2/17/24 showed: -His/Her Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was providing services at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. The facility census was 67 residents. The RN Coverage policy was requested and not provided at the time of exit. Review of the facility's Staffing policy, dated April 2007, showed: -The facility maintained adequate staffing for each shift to ensure that resident's needs and services were met. -Licensed RN staff were available to provide and monitor the delivery of resident care services. 1. Review of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Staffing Report dated April 1 - June 30, 2023 showed the facility triggered for the following areas: -One Star Staffing Rating. -Excessively Low Weekend Staffing. Review of the CMS Staffing Report dated July 1 - September 30, 2023 showed the facility triggered for One Star Staffing Rating. Review of the CMS Staffing Report dated October 1 - December 31, 2023 showed the facility triggered for One Star Staffing Rating. Review of the facility's undated current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Medication Regimen Review (MRR) was responded to for four sampled residents (Resident #42, #19, #24 and #41) out of 5 residents reviewed for MRR out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Regimen Reviews dated as revised in April 2007 showed: -The Consultant Pharmacist was responsible for performing a MRR for every resident in the facility monthly. -The Consultant Pharmacist would document his/her findings and recommendations on the monthly drug/medication regimen review report. -The Consultant Pharmacist would provide a written report to physicians for each resident with an identified irregularity. -Copies of MRR reports, including physician responses, will be maintained as part of the permanent medical record. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Utilization and Prescribing - Clinical protocol dated as revised in July 2016 showed the Consultant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor the medication refrigerator temperatures and to remove expired medications which had no open dates from the Rehabilitation Unit medication refrigerator. The facility census was 67 residents. The facility policy titled Administering Medications dated December 2012 showed: -Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. -The expiration/beyond use date on the medication label must be checked prior to administering. -When opening a multidose container, the date opened shall be recorded on the container. 1. Observation on 4/18/24 at 6:33 A.M., of the Rehabilitation Unit medication refrigerator showed: -A paper refrigerator temperature log was laying on top of the medication refrigerator. -The log was dated 2024. -The log had columns for daily temperatures for each month of the year. -All columns were blank for January through April 18, 2024. 2. Observation on 4/18/24 at 6:33 A.M., of the Rehabilitation Unit medication refrigerator showed two expired medications: -A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-22 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four sampled residents, (Resident #37, #268, # 267, and #32) who had broken or missing teeth were seen by a dentist out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's policy, Dental Services dated December 2016 showed: -Routine and emergency dental services were available to meet the resident's oral health services in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. -Routine and 24-hour emergency dental services were provided to residents through a contract agreement with a licensed dentist that comes to the facility monthly. -Social services representatives would assist residents with appointments, transportation arrangements, and for reimbursement of dental services under the state plan, if eligible. -All dental services provided were to have been recorded in the resident's medical record. 1. Review of Resident #37's face sheet showed a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement measures to adequately respond to situations raised by two sampled residents (Resident #37 and #33) in the resident council meetings regarding receiving cold food out of 17 sampled residents; failed to ensure hot foods were at or close to 120 ºF (degrees Fahrenheit) and cold foods were served at a temperature of 41 ºF at the time of room tray service on the 500, 300 and the 200 Hall; and failed to ensure hot foods were served at or close to a temperature of 120 ºF who received room trays on the 200 and 300 Hall. The facility census was 67 residents. 1. Review of the resident council minutes dated 3/19/24, showed the residents raised the issue of cold food. Review of the resident council department response form dated 3/19/24 showed the following written response from the Dietary Manager (DM) regarding the resident question about cold food showed: - He/she (the DM) was filling in as a DM temporarily. - He/she did not know anything…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases when the facility failed to provide Tuberculosis (TB-a communicable disease that affects the lungs, that is characterized by fever, cough, difficulty in breathing, abnormal lung tissue and function) testing for five sampled residents (Resident #33, #48, #60, #61, and #173) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's Tuberculosis, Screening Residents for, policy, dated July 2013, showed: -The facility screened all residents for TB. -The facility screened referrals for admission and readmission for information regarding exposure to or symptoms of TB. -TB skin tests (TST) completed within the last 12 months were reviewed. -Residents without documentation of a previous TST received a two-step TST upon admission. -If the results of the first TST were negative then a second TST was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases when the facility failed to offer pneumococcal (lung inflammation caused by bacterial or viral infection) and/or influenza (flu-a highly contagious viral infection of the respiratory passages causing fever, severe aching, and often occurring in an epidemic) vaccines for five sampled residents (Resident #33 #48, #60, #61 and #173) out of five residents sampled for immunizations. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's Vaccination of Residents policy, dated August 2017, showed: -All resident were offered vaccines that aided in preventing infections diseases unless the vaccine was medically contraindicated, or the resident had already been vaccinated. -Resident's or resident representatives were provided information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccinations. -Any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-22 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases when the facility failed to provide the COVID-19 (an acute disease in humans caused by a virus, which caused fever, cough and could progress to severe symptoms and in some cases death, especially in older people and those with underlying health conditions) vaccine for three sampled residents (Resident #60, #61 and #173) out of five residents sampled for immunizations. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's Vaccination of Residents policy, dated August 2017, showed: -All resident were offered vaccines that aided in preventing infectious diseases unless the vaccine was medically contraindicated, or the resident had already been vaccinated. -Resident's or resident representatives were provided information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccinations. -Any education…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident's (Resident #61) code status was changed from a full code (if a person's heart stopped beating and or or they stopped breathing, all resuscitation procedures would be provided to keep them alive) to a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR - a legal document that means a person has decided not to have cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempted on them if their heart stops or they stop breathing) status, out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's policy, Advance Directives, dated December 2016 showed: -Upon admission, the resident would have been provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she choose to do so. -If a resident was incapacitated and unable to receive information about his or her right to formulate an advance directive, the information may have been provided to the resident's legal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-22 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident with a written summary of a baseline care plan that included instructions needed to provide the resident with care until the comprehensive care plan was developed for two sampled residents (Resident #41 and #60) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans - Baseline dated as revised December 2016 showed: -A baseline care plan would be developed within the first 48 hours of the resident's admission. -The interdisciplinary team would implement a baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate care needs. -The baseline care plan would be used until the staff could conduct the comprehensive assessment and develop an interdisciplinary person-centered care plan. -The resident and their representative will be provided a summary of the baseline care plan that includes but it not limited to: --The initial goals of the resident. --A summary of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document the administration of pain medication for one sampled resident (Resident #41) and failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #33) had taken his/her prescribed medications out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Pain Medication dated as revised October 2010 showed the policy did not address where to document the administration of opioids (pain medications used to treat severe pain). Review of the facility's policy, Administering Medications, dated December 2012 showed: -The Director of Nursing Services would supervise and direct all nursing personnel who administer medication. -Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the Attending Physician, in conjunction with the Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. Review of the facility's undated policy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bathing/showers were completed at least once weekly and at the resident's preference for two sampled residents (Resident #13, and #54) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's shower policy dated October 2010 showed: -No indication of how often a shower/bath should be offered or given. -The purposes of the procedure. -General guidelines. -Equipment and supplies. -Steps in the procedure. -Information recorded on the residents' Activity of Daily Living (ADL) record and/or the residents medical record as: --The date and time the shower was performed. --The name and title of individual who assisted the resident with the shower. --All assessment data pertaining to the resident's skin condition obtained during the shower. --The reason why and the intervention taken if the resident refused the shower. --The signature and title of the person recording the data. -Notify the supervisor if the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered weekly weights were completed for one sampled resident (Resident #61) who had lost weight and was receiving tube feeding out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's policy, Weighing and Measuring the Resident, dated March 2011 showed: -The purposes of the procedure were to determine the resident's weight and height, to provide a baseline and ongoing record of the resident's body weight as an indicator of the nutritional status of the resident. -Weight was usually measured upon admission and monthly. -The following information should have been recorded in the resident's medical record: --The date and time the procedure was preformed. --The name and title of the individual who had performed the procedure. --The height and weight of the resident. 1. Review of Resident #61's face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis (the process of removing blood from an artery (as of a kidney patient), purifying it by dialysis, adding vital substances, and returning it to a vein) center regarding dialysis care and services for one sampled resident (Resident #18) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Care of a resident with end-stage renal (kidney) disease dated as revised September 2020 showed the policy did not address communication between the facility and the dialysis center. 1. Review of Resident #18's care plan dated 3/7/23 showed the resident received dialysis. Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff and used for care planning) dated 3/13/24 showed the following staff assessment of the resident: -Cognitively intact. -Had a diagnosis of end-stage kidney disease. -Received dialysis. Review of the resident's Physician's Order Sheet (POS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications were administered for a specific condition and as needed orders were limited to 14 days without review at 14 days and without documented physician rationale for one sampled resident (Resident #41); and to ensure the resident received a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for psychotropic medications after it was recommended by a pharmacist in a Medication Regimen Review (MRR) for one sampled resident (Resident #24) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Utilization and Prescribing - Clinical Protocol dated as revised in July 2016 showed: -The physician and the staff would identify the indications for a prescribed medication. -An attempt at determining the likely cause of symptoms should be made. -The physician and staff would review the rationale for existing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-22 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the lids of the dumpster were closed after facility staff place trash the dumpsters. This practice affected one outdoor area. The facility census was 67 residents. 1. Observation on 4/15/24 at 9:59 A.M. and 11:21 A.M., showed both outdoor dumpsters were left open. 2. Observation on 4/16/24 at 2:20 P.M, showed two lids of one dumpster were left open. 3. Observation on 4/17/24 at 12:36 P.M,, showed the lids of both dumpsters were left open. During an interview on 4/17/24 at 12:38 P.M., the Dietary Manager (DM) said he/she expected all departments within the facility who used the dumpsters to place items in to keep the dumpsters closed and keep the raccoons out.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the siding located on the outside of the former dementia unit and the siding on the outside wall behind the kitchen in good repair, which created openings that pests could get into. This practice potentially affected an unknown number of residents. The facility census was 67 residents. 1. Observation on 4/15/24 at 8:36 A.M., showed the siding on the outside wall of the dementia unit with a bird that went into one of the gaps in the missing siding. 2. Observation on 4/16/24 at 2:17 P.M., with the Maintenance Director showed an approximately 6 feet (ft.) wide by 2 ft. high section of siding behind the air conditioning unit outside the kitchen that was damaged with the insulation that was under the siding visible. During an interview on 4/16/24 at 2:19 P.M., the Maintenance Director said the siding was damaged before he/she started his/her tenure and the water from the damaged downspout contributed to the damage in that area. 3. Observation on 4/16/24 at 2:23 P.M., with the Maintenance Director, showed an approximately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #1) with a facility acquired pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) that became infected requiring antibiotic therapy had weekly assessments of his/her skin and to ensure assessment, staging and measurements and description of the wound bed and drainage, and that the resident's care plan was revised to address his/her coccyx (tailbone) pressure and his/her pressure ulcer infection, and failed to ensure weekly licensed nurse skin assessments and weekly wound documentation for one sampled resident (Resident #8) admitted to the facility with two unstageable (not stageable due to coverage of the wound bed with slough - tan/yellow dead tissue or eschar - dry, black hard dead tissue) pressure ulcers, out of eight sampled residents. The facility census was 71 residents. Review of the facility Wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-26 · tag F0800 — widespread
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, dietary staff failed to follow the recipe directions for Egg Salad Sandwich to maintain the temperature at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit (ºF) in the kitchen before the time of service. This practice potentially affected 63 residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility census was 67 residents. 1. Record review of the directions for the Egg Salad Sandwich showed: - Chill all ingredients prior to use. - Boil boil eggs till hard, then refrigerate at 41 ºF for several hours. - Peel eggs and chop. - Combine all remaining ingredients (relish, mayonnaise, mustard, red peppers) in a bowl and mix well. Observation on 8/21/22 from 3:37 P.M. through 6:21 P.M. showed: - Eggs were placed in boiling water. - Dietary [NAME] (DC) B placed the eggs in ice to cool them off cooling off eggs. - Between 5:17 P.M. and 5:42 P.M., the additional ingredients were mixed with eggs to make the egg salad. - The dietary staff did not chill all ingredients prior to use. - The pan which contained the egg salad mix was placed on ice in a well on the steam…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure paper towels were available at the handwashing sink next to the food preparation table; to ensure the handwashing sink next to the food preparation table was not blocked by boxes; to ensure the handwashing sink next to the automated dishwasher was not obstructed by a food cart and a red washing bucket; to discard 12 containers of half and half dairy product was discarded by the use by date; to discard two gallons of milk by the use by date; to remove an area of mildew or mold form the upper part of the ice machine; to maintain the gasket (a mechanical seal which fills the space between two or more mating surfaces, generally to prevent leakage from or into the joined objects), to store one bag of onions off the floor; to ensure light fixtures, sprinkler heads and door frames, were free of a dust buildup in the kitchen area; to ensure a cup of coffee at the food preparation table was covered; to ensure there was not debris in one of the utensil drawers; to remove debris from the floor under the ice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-26 · tag F0813 — widespread
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that items stored in the resident use refrigerator were labeled with a date they were placed in the fridge, a resident's name to identify who the items belonged to; to remove items that had expired according to the date on the package;and to maintain the resident use refrigerator free of food stains within the refrigerator and along the gasket which went around the inside part of the refrigerator. This practice potentially affected an unknown number of residents whose food was stored in that refrigerator. The facility census was 67 residents. Record review of the Policy entitled Foods Brought by Family/Visitors revised in 2/14, showed: - Family members should inform nursing staff of their desire to bring foods into the facility. - The Dietitian or a Nurse Supervisor should assure that the food is not in conflict with the resident's prescribed diet plan. - Perishable foods must be stored in re-sealable containers with tightly fitting lids in the refrigerator. - Containers will be labeled with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to include the following in their Water Management Plan: diagrams from hot water heaters and the destinations of water from those hot water heaters, corrective actions that the facility would implement as a result of changes in municipal or facility water quality and members of the water management team; to ensure documentation of the most previous backflow testing (using valves on the backflow testing device, known as backflow preventers to ensure they're working properly to prevent contaminated water from going back into the building) was conducted. The facility also failed to follow appropriate infection control practices during wound care for one sampled resident (Resident #27); and to ensure infection control measures were performed to prevent cross contamination during incontinence care for two sampled residents (Resident #23 and #42) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Record review of page 3 of Centers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen steam table in working order; to maintain two washers and two clothes' dryers in the laundry in working order; and to have a system to indicate that the clothes' dryers were not working. The facility census was 67 residents. 1. During an interview on 8/21/22 at 5:48 P.M., Dietary [NAME] (DC) B said: - No pans could be placed in the middle well of the steam table because it would not shut off. - The dietary staff were going to serve meals that needed to be kept cold that day. - There have been four maintenance persons that have tried to fix the steam table, but were unsuccessful. Observation on 8/21/22 at 5:50 P.M. showed the absence of a switch from the middle well of the steam table. During an interview on 8/21/22 at 7:32 P.M., the Administrator said he/she was not notified by maintenance regarding the steam table. 2. Observation with the Housekeeping Supervisor on 8/23/22 from 2:18 P.M. through 2:23 P.M. showed: - Two clothes' dryers in the laundry which were not working without any signs or warnings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that openings that could let pests in, the attic area above the dry goods storage area and the Memory Care Unit hot water heater room, were maintained in good repair; and to clean up dead insect carcasses in the 300 Hall soiled utility room, the 400 Hall medication room, and the 200 Hall climate control unit room. This practice potentially affected at least 40 residents who resided in or used those areas. The facility census was 67 residents. 1. Observations of the attic area over the kitchen dry goods storage room, with the Maintenance Director on 8/22/22 at 10:27 A.M. and 11:22 A.M., showed the presence of wasps which flew around in the attic, bird and mouse droppings, dried vegetation, and a dead carcass of an animal that was not identifiable. During an interview on 8/22/22 at 10:34 A.M. the Maintenance Director said he/she needed to spray the wasps. Observation of the outside of the attic area on 8/22/222 at 10:36 A.M., showed a 2.5 inch (in.) opening that was not sealed, that wasps used, to fly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-26 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation that change was returned to two sampled residents (Residents #23 and #24), after money was spent on their behalf during a shopping trip. The facility also failed to provide records pertaining to the following areas within resident trust: reconciled bank statements for [DATE], [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE]; a listing of the residents' transactions over the past few months ([DATE] through [DATE] at least); a list of residents who were discharged with resident funds; a list of residents who were deceased with resident funds; and quarterly statements from [DATE] through [DATE]. This practice affected 29 residents who allowed the facility to manage their funds. The facility census was 67 residents. 1. Record review of a receipt dated [DATE], showed $50.00 was spent for an item for Resident #23 with change of $20.39. There was no documentation to show that the change was returned to the resident. 2. Record review of a receipt dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain bed sheets free from stains and to change those sheets for five days of the survey for one sampled resident (Resident #40) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility also failed to maintain ceiling fans in the Golden Meadows dining room, the Memory Care Unit and the Social Worker's Office, free of a heavy buildup of dust; to maintain the floors of the resident rooms 110, 105, 310, 208, 201, free of a grime buildup; to maintain a stand up lift used on 400 Hall, without grime and food crumbs on its base; and to maintain a shower chair in the Memory Care Unit shower room in good repair. This practice potentially affected at least 40 residents who resided in or use these areas. The facility census as 67 residents. A request for the bed linen policy was made to the Corporate Liaison on 8/26/22; the policy was not received. 1. Record review of Resident #40's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-26 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dinner meal was served in a timely manner according to the listed meal schedule, on 8/21/22. This practice potentially affected 63 residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility census was 67 residents. 1. Record review of the undated document which stated the facility meal times, showed dinner was supposed to be served at 5:00 P.M. Record review of the resident council minutes dated 5/12/22 showed late meals was one of the concerns raised during that meeting. Record review of Resident Council minutes dated 6/9/22, showed there was not any written followup to the concerns raised in the meeting on 5/12/22. During an interview on 8/21/22 at 3:25 P.M., Dietary Aide (DA) A said the turkey burgers did not come in on the most recent food and ingredient delivery to the facility, so they would change to making egg salad. Observations on 8/21/22 showed - At 4:46 P.M., Dietary [NAME] (DC) placed the eggs in ice to cool them off…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all the necessary items were available for the dinner meal on 8/21/22; to notify the Registered Dietitian (RD) when the dietary department changed from one entrée to another entrée on 8/21/22; and to ensure the recipe for super cereal was available for dietary staff to use while making the super cereal, for one observed resident (Resident #42). This practice potentially affected 62 residents who ate food from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 67 residents. 1. Record review of the weekly menu entitled Week at a Glance for General/Regular Week 1, dated 3/7/2022 showed the meal that was to be served on 8/21/22 was Philly style turkey burger, seasoned green beans, strawberries and whipped topping hamburger bun, 2% milk, and hot beverage. Record review of the order sheet dated 8/15/22, showed the turkey burgers were not ordered at the time for the meal on 8/21/22. During an interview on 8/21/22 at 3:32 P.M., Dietary [NAME] (DC) A said: - Turkey burgers did not come in on the truck with the food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the hot foods (sausage and eggs) of breakfast meal was at or close to 120 degrees Fahrenheit (ºF) at the time of service to residents on the Memory Care Unit on 8/25/22. This practice potentially affected 12 residents who resided on the Memory Care Unit. The facility census was 67 residents. 1. Observation of the breakfast food at the steam table on 8/25/22 at 7:52 A.M., showed the temperatures for the food served was scrambled eggs were 156.4 ºF, oatmeal cereal was 183 ºF, sausage was 142 ºF, and hot cereal was 175.3 ºF. Observation on 8/25/22 at 8:28 A.M., showed the food cart was delivered to the Memory Care Unit. Observation on 8/25/22 from 8:29 A.M. through 8:32 A.M., showed Certified Medication Technician (CMT) A provided assistance to Resident #21, in getting that resident dressed. Further observation showed (CMT) A was the only staff on the Memory Care Unit at the time During an interview on 8/25/22 at 8:33 A.M., CMT A said he/she was the only one from nursing staff who worked on the unit at the time.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-26 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update the authorization to manage resident funds for one sampled resident (Resident #23) by failing to obtain a signature of authorization from the resident's legal guardian, when the status of that resident was changed from having self determination to needing a guardian. The facility census was 67 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #23's paperwork showed: - The resident signed to allow the facility to manage his/her funds when he/she was admitted on [DATE]. - The resident became a ward (a person, usually a minor or of unsound mind, for whom a guardian has been appointed by a court or one who has become directly subject to the authority of that court) of the County Public Administrator on 9/23/19. During an interview on 8/24/22 at 9:56 A.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) said: - The facility did not get his/her authorization updated at that time. - That resident's status was changed before his/her tenure at the facility which started on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a current copy of each resident's Advanced Directive (legal document which allows you to plan and make your own end-of-life wishes known in the event you are unable to communicate) for one sampled resident (Resident #61) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Record review of Revisor.mo.gov's article Title XII Public Health and Welfare-Chapter 190 dated [DATE] showed: -An Outside the Hospital Do-Not-Resuscitate Order (OHDNR) requires a written physician's order signed by the patient and the attending physician, or the patient's representative and the attending physician, in a form promulgated by rule of the department which authorizes emergency medical services personnel to withhold or withdraw cardiopulmonary resuscitation from the patient in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest. Record review of the facility's policy Advanced Directives dated [DATE] showed: -Prior to or upon admission, the Social Services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and follow a complete detailed physician's order for type, care and monitoring of a Suprapubic catheter (a urinary bladder catheter inserted through the skin about one inch above the symphysis pubis); and to follow infection control practices by ensuring a Suprapubic catheter drainage bag (a bag that holds drained urine) was kept off the floor for one sampled resident (Resident #18) who was at risk for Urinary Tack Infections (UTI - an infection of one or more structures in the urinary system); out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Record review of Missouri Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Manual Nursing Assistant in Long term Care Facility Student Reference, Revised 2010 showed: -Indwelling catheter (is a catheter tube passed through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine) care should be provided at least every shift and if soiled. -The catheter drainage tubing and bag must be maintained below the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-26 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were detailed for a colostomy (ostomy, an alternative exit from the colon created to divert waste through a hole in the colon and through the wall of the abdomen stoma) care to include the type of appliances, skin barriers and skin care; to obtain physician orders for self-care of colostomy; to complete a self-care assessment for the residents ability to perform own care; and to document a detailed skin assessment of the colostomy site for one sampled resident (Resident #1) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census of 67 residents. The facility colostomy care policy was requested and was not received at the time of exit. 1. Record review of Resident #1's face-sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of having a colostomy and history of stroke. Record review of the resident's Weekly Skin Assessment Sheets dated 3/8/22 showed no documentation related to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's dietary orders were transcribed to the Medication Administration Record (MAR) monthly, to ensure physician's dietary supplement orders were followed, and to ensure dietary interventions were being monitored and documented to prevent gradual weight loss that became significant for one sampled resident (Resident #42) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Record review of the Facility's Nutrition/Unplanned Weight Loss policy and procedure dated 9/2012, showed the facility will monitor and document the weight and dietary intake of the residents which permits readily available comparisons over time. The threshold for significant unplanned weight loss/undesired weight loss included a 10 percent weight loss within six months was considered significant. Weight loss greater than 10 percent was considered severe. The procedure showed: -The physician will assess the possible causes of weight loss with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were complete for the resident's tube feeding (a medical device used to provide nutrition to people who cannot obtain nutrition by mouth, are unable to swallow safely, or need nutritional supplementation. The state of being fed by a feeding tube is called enteral feeding or tube feeding) to show how the facility was going to monitor the tube to ensure patency, to check Gastric Residual Volume (GRV) and flushing the gastrostomy tube (also called G-tube or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube, is a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications) before, during and after medication administration and bolus (the administration of a limited volume of enteral formula over brief periods of time) feedings, and to have detailed documentation of the tube feeding process for two sampled residents (Resident#10 and #18) out of 17…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store the oxygen nasal cannula/tubing (used to deliver oxygen through the resident's nose) and nebulizer mask/tubing (used for aerosol breathing treatments) in a manner to prevent the spread of infection for two sampled residents (Resident #70 and #40) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Record review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration dated October 2010 showed facility staff were to document in the resident's electronic chart when tubing was changed. Record review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications through a Small Volume Nebulizer dated October 2010 showed: -Facility staff were to store the nebulizer mask and tubing in a plastic bag with the resident's name and the date the mask/tubing was opened. -Facility staff were to change the mask/tubing every seven days. 1. Record review of Resident #40's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted on [DATE] with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and transcribe detailed physician orders for dialysis (process of cleansing the blood by passing it through a special machine - necessary when the kidneys are not able to filter the blood) care and monitoring of dialysis line (port) or dialysis shunt monitoring and care; to obtain diet order, transcribe and follow-up on recommended dialysis nutrition orders; to document ongoing observations and monitoring for the resident before, and after dialysis treatments; and to provide ongoing management of nutritional and fluid intake including documentation of weights, resident compliance with food and fluid restrictions or the provision of meals before, during and/or after dialysis and monitoring intake and output measurements as ordered for one sampled resident (Resident #1) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. The facility did not provide a Dialysis policy at time of exit. 1. Record review of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$166,800 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $166,800 — penalty dated 2025-08-14
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-11-14 for 28 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$840K
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 54%Medicare 7%Other / private 39%

This home reported $840K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$275per resident / day
operating cost
$8,355per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$262per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265349. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next