Capitol River Wellness & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 73.9 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 46 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to provide 24-hour protective oversight for one sampled resident (Resident #1) when they failed to conduct visual checks on the resident on 09/22/23 from 6:45 P.M. to 8:26 A.M. At that time, staff found the resident in his/her room on the floor with blood on his/her hands and face. Hospital staff determined the resident suffered a fracture to the right sixth rib. Facility census was 93. The Administrator was notified on 9/27/23 at 4:23 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 9/22/23. The IJ was removed on 9/24/23 as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. 1. Review showed the facility did not have a policy on monitoring or rounding on residents. During an interview on 9/26/23 at 12:55 P.M., the administrator said the facility did not have a policy on monitoring or rounding on residents, but staff followed standard practices. This included completing walking rounds from room to room, at the beginning of each shift. Staff should continue to check on residents at least every two hours until the next shift…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to maintain a comfortable and homelike environment. The facility census was 84. 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Maintenance Services, dated August 2020, showed the Maintenance Department is responsible for maintaining the building in compliance with current federal, state, and local, regulations, and guidelines. The Director of Maintenance is responsible for conducting regular inspections of hallways and activity areas. 2. Observation on 05/19/26 at 8:36 A.M., showed the memory care unit walls below the handrails, unpainted, and missing baseboard with exposed screws. 3. Observation on 05/19/26 at 10:56 A.M., showed the main dining walls with missing base trim, exposed unfinished and unpainted drywall. 4. Observation on 05/19/26 at 10:59 A.M., showed the 100 and 300 hallway walls with missing base trim and a large hole in the drywall between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. 5. Observation on 05/19/26 at 12:29 P.M., showed kitchenette in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide written information to the residents and/or the residents' representative of the bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for eight residents (Resident #8, #12, #28, #47, #67, #71, and #86) out of 23 residents sampled. The facility census was 84. 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Bed Hold, dated June 2020, showed the facility notifies the resident or his/her representative, in writing, of the bed hold policy any time the resident is transferred to general acute care hospital. 2. Review of Resident #8's medical record showed staff documented the resident discharged from the facility to the hospital on [DATE] and had not returned. The medical record did not contain documentation staff provided the bed hold policy upon discharge to the resident or the resident's responsible party. 3. Review of Resident #12's medical record showed staff documented the resident discharged from the facility to the hospital on [DATE] and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, facility staff failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for six residents (Resident #8, #35, #62, #67, #71, and #86) out 23 sampled residents. The facility census was 84.1. Review of the facility's policy titled Care Planning, dated 06/2020, showed the Facility will develop a person-centered Baseline Care Plan for each resident within 48 hours of admission and will include at least the initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, and social services. 2. Review of Resident #8's medical record showed staff documented the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the record showed a baseline care plan was not completed.3. Review of Resident #35's medical record showed staff documented the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the record showed a baseline care plan completed on 03/04/26.4. Review of Resident #62's medical record showed staff documented the resident admitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to complete entrapment assessments for four residents (Resident #5, #9, #71, and #83) who used bed rails out of 23 sampled residents. The facility census was 84. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Bed Rails, dated 06/2020, showed: -Before installing a bed rail, the facility must assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails and ensure the beds dimensions are appropriate for the resident's size and weight; -Maintenance/Designee will assess the bed dimensions no less than quarterly; -Maintenance will also check bed rails regularly to ensure they are still installed correctly, as rails may shift or become loose over time. The facility policy did not address zone measurements for risk of entrapment. 2. Review of Resident #5's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 03/06/26, showed staff documented bed rails not used. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 03/08/26, showed staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure sanitary conditions for a urinary drainage bag (a bag attached to a tube that holds urine) when staff failed to keep the drainage bag off the floor for three residents (Resident #5, #58 and #34) out of three sampled residents. The Facility census was 84. 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Catheter-Care of, dated June 2020, showed catheter collection bags should always be kept below the level of the bladder, including during transport, avoiding contact with the floor. Take care to ensure the collection bag does not touch the floor at any time. 2. Review of Resident #5's Annual Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 03/06/26, showed staff assessed the resident with an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 04/09/26, showed the resident required a Foley Catheter (a flexible, sterile tube inserted into the bladder to continuously drain urine) and directed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure two resident's (Resident #1 and #2) were allowed to exercise resident's rights when staff opened their mail without the resident's present. The facility census was 81. 1. Review of facility's resident bill of right's policy, dated November 2016, showed residents have the right to send and receive mail promptly and unopened. 2. Review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 3/12/25, showed staff assessed the resident as cognitively intact. During an interview on 4/28/25 at 10:00 A.M., the resident said the business officer manager (BOM) opened his/her mail in his/her office and then came in his/her room on 4/24/25. He/She has an audio conversation with the BOM where the BOM said he/she opens residents mail that comes from places like Medicaid and disability because it may affect the residents billing. He/She said he/she asked the BOM for the envelope to see who the envelope was addressed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to maintain professional standards of care, when staff failed to document they provided colostomy care for one resident (Resident #1), catheter care for one resident (Resident #2), monitor blood glucose levels for one resident (Resident #3), or obtain weights for one resident (Resident #4) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 81. 1. Review of the facility's Colostomy Care policy, dated 08/2017, showed staff were directed to document on treatment sheet care completed. Review of the facility's Weights policy, dated 10/2009, showed staff were directed to electronically document weights. The facility did not provide a policy in regard to catheter care or blood glucose monitoring documentation guidance. 2. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 12/20/24, showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -Cognitively intact; -Did not reject care; -Used an ostomy bag (a surgical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and record review, facility staff failed to provide adequate nursing staff, as determined by their facility assessment. The facility census was 81. 1. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 08/02/24, showed staff are directed as follows: -Direct care staff required to care for their facility census for an eight hour shift should include: Three day nurses, three evening nurses, three night nurses, six day Certified Nurse Aides (CNA's), six evening CNA's, five night CNA's, and two day shower aide's. -The assessment is based on the resident population and their healthcare needs and support; -The average daily census number of occupied beds was 88. Review of the employee staffing schedule from 02/01/25 through 02/28/25, with an average daily census of 88, showed: -Saturday 02/01/25- zero day shower aides, two evening nurses and five CNA's; -Monday 02/03/25- zero day shower aides and four night CNA's; -Wednesday 02/05/25- five day CNA's and zero day shower aides; -Thursday 02/06/25- one day shower aide and two night nurses; -Friday 02/07/25- five…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to store food in a manner to prevent potential contamination and outdated use. The facility census was 85 1. Review of the facility's Food Storage (Dry, Refrigerated, and Frozen) policy, dated 2016. showed: -Food shall be stored on shelves in a clean, dry area, free from contaminants; -Foods shall be stored at proper temperatures and using appropriate methods to ensure the highest level of food safety; -Label food items held for longer than 24 hours with the name of the food, if not in original packaging, and the date by which it should be sold,consumed or discarded; -Discard food that has passed the expiration date, and discard food that has been prepared in the facility after seven days of storing proper refrigeration (at a temperature that ensures the internal temperature of the food is 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below); -Leftover contents of cans and prepared food will be stored in covered, labeled and dated containers in refrigerators and/or freezers; -Store raw animal foods, such as eggs, meat, poultry,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to prevent the commingling of 32 resident's (Resident #8, #9, #12, #17, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #27, #32, #35, #39, #43, #44, #46, #49, #52, #60, #65, #71, #78, #87, #89, #90, #91, #92, #93, #94, #95, #96, and #97) personal funds with the facility operating funds out of 85 sampled. The sampled residents resided in the facility. The facility census was 85. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Collections Guidelines, undated, showed: -Requests for a refund that is a result of a credit balance on the resident's account; -Resident refunds are requested based on the following; -When a resident has discharged the facility with no anticipation of returning; -When an overpayment of funds was applied to the account and a refund is requested by the resident or responsible party; -Third Party Refunds are requested based on the following; -When a Third-party payer has made an overpayment in comparison to the amount that was billed; -When a resident has died…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,446 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,446 — penalty dated 2023-09-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NORBERT BENNETT & DONALD DENZ — 2 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes:

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO