Bishop Spencer Place, Inc, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 228 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.77 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 47.3 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.46 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.97 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.88 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.03 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #1) was free from a significant medication error. On 7/12/24 Resident #1 was administered 5 milliliters (ml) (100 mg (milligrams)/5 ml) oral solution of morphine concentrate (a opiate medicine used to treat moderate to severe pain) instead of the physician ordered 0.5 ml (10 mg) by mouth PRN (as needed) every 6 hours for pain. Narcan (a medicine that can save someone from a prescription Opioid medicine overdose) was ordered by the physician due to the dosage being 10 times the amount ordered and administered. The facility census was 48 residents. The Administrator was notified on 7/24/24 at 2:12 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 7/12/24. The IJ was removed on 7/24/24 as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 6/29/2023, showed: -Purpose was to administer medications at approximate times as an individual would in their home…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an appropriate infection control program to include a system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, visitors, and others; and failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices were maintained during one sampled resident's (Resident #21) wound care treatment out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 53 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled [NAME] Place Infection Prevention Plan dated 9/10/25 showed:-The Director of Nursing (DON) in collaboration with the Infection Prevention nurse had the authority to institute any surveillance, prevention, or control measures or study when there was reason to believe that any resident, personnel, or visitor may be in danger.-This authority and responsibility included, but was not limited to:--Developing and implementing a preventative and corrective program to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic stewardship (the effort to measure and improve how antibiotics are prescribed by clinicians and used by patients/residents) program was in place which had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 53 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Antimicrobial Stewardship in Senior Living Communities, GA-457 dated 9/23/25 showed:-The facility would establish and maintain as Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) to ensure optimal use of antimicrobials in the treatment and prevention of infectious diseases.-The ASP would focus its efforts on reviewing appropriateness of antimicrobial regimens for residents within the facility.-All residents with antimicrobials would be screened/reviewed by the Pharmacist.-Residents whom staff deemed high-level targets would get a formal review and, when appropriate, a recommendation would be made to the clinical staff regarding suggested changes in therapy.-ASP recommendations would be communicated to providers responsible for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their facility Criminal Background Investigations policy showed a check of the Nurse Aide (NA) Registry would be completed for all potential facility employees and volunteers; subsequently, three facility employee records (Employees C, D, and E) out of five facility employee records sampled did not have NA Registry background screenings completed prior to hire, potentially affecting any resident at the facility. The facility census was 53 residents.Review of the facility's Criminal Background Investigations, HR-008 policy, revised 2/28/22, showed:-Applicants will complete the Post-Offer Credit Report Act (FCRA) Disclosure and confirm their understanding of the criminal background check requirement. Applicants who do not agree to a post-offer background check will not be allowed to move further in the on-line application process.-A post-offer background check will review any history of felony convictions in the past seven years or pending criminal charges when the third-party vendor e-consent form is completed.-The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were up to date and reflected three sampled residents (Resident #50, #57, and #73) current status out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 53 residents.Review of the facility's policy titled Bishop [NAME] Place (BSP) Service/Care Plans dated 10/6/25 showed:-The purpose of the policy was to identify the components of a resident's service/care plan and provide guidance on how the service/care plan should be created and implemented for the resident's daily care routine.-Service/Care plans should incorporate measurable goals, objectives and timetables that lead to the resident's highest obtainable level of independence.-Service/Care plans should be used in developing the resident's daily care routines and would be available to staff personnel who have responsibility for providing care or services to the resident.-The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) was responsible for the development of an individualized,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document the residents [NAME] Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning) for a resident on hospice services by not marking section J item number J1400 for prognosis less than six months to live for one sampled resident (Resident #54) out of 14 sampled residents the facility census was 53 residents.Review of the facility policy titled [NAME] Place (BSP) Minimum Data Set revised 12/2/25 showed:-A Registered Nurse (RN), also known as the MDS Coordinator, would be responsible for conducting and coordinating the development, completion, and submission of the MDS Assessment for each resident.-The individual who completed a portion of the MDS must have certified the accuracy of that portion of the assessment. -The MDS Coordinator or designee would be responsible for ensuring that a resident assessment was submitted to Federal and state MDS database in accordance with current federal and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR a requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) for one sampled resident (Resident #57) was reviewed for accuracy and updated after admission to the facility out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 53 residents.A policy related to PASRRs was requested and not received prior to exit on 1/9/26.1. Review of Resident #57's PASRR Level One Screening dated 9/1/21 showed:-The screening had been completed by a local hospital prior to the resident's admission to the facility.-The resident did not show any signs or symptoms of a major mental disorder.-The resident had never been diagnosed with a major mental disorder. Review of the resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 12/24/25 showed:-The resident felt down, depressed, or hopeless two to six…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident's (Resident #21) wound care orders were followed during observation of his/her wound care out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 53 residents.A policy related to following physician orders was requested and not received prior to exit on 1/9/26.1. Review of Resident #21's admission Record showed the resident readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Osteomyelitis (an infection and inflammation of bone tissue).Review of the resident's Order Summary Report dated January 2026 showed:-The resident had a Stage II (partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough. It may also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister) Pressure Ulcer (an injury to the skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) to his/her coccyx (the small bone at the bottom of the spine).-Staff were to cleanse with normal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #58) out of 14 sampled residents had bed assist devices installed in a timely manner, clarified if the resident needed a right side bed assist bar or bilateral bed devices, and failed to ensure the resident's care plan identified specifically the equipment needed to improve the resident's independence with bed mobility and transfers. The facility census was 53 residents.Review of the facility's Bed Rails Policy, revised 12/24/25 showed:-Bed rails will also refer to grab bars, halo bars, assist bars, and safety rails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to a bed). Transfer bars, mobility enhancers, and bed canes are rails used on beds and are intended to 1) reduce the risk of falling from bed, 2) assist the resident in repositioning in bed, and/or 3) assist the resident in transitioning into or out of the bed.-The Interdisciplinary Team will use data collected from individual bed rail…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide catheter care, document catheter care, or refusal of catheter care for one sampled resident (Resident #33) out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 53 residents. Review of facility policy titled Management of Foley Catheters revised 12/2/2025 showed:-Document the care in the electronic medical record. 1. Review of Resident #33's Admissions Record showed the resident's readmission date of 11/11/25 with the following diagnoses:-Urinary tract infection.-End stage renal disease (ESRD is when you have permanent kidney failure that requires a regular course of dialysis or a kidney transplant). Review of the resident's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated November 2025 showed 13 out of 38 opportunities where catheter care was not documented.Review of the resident's progress notes dated November 2025 showed no documentation where catheter care was refused by the resident. Review of the resident's Order Summary Report dated November…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two sampled residents (Resident #2 and #3) were free from medication errors, out of 10 sampled residents. On 3/25/24 Resident #2 was given the wrong medication when the Certified Medication Technician (CMT) handed the medication to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A, who then administered the medication to the wrong resident, and on 4/4/24 Resident #3 was given his/her medication twice. A family member had given the medication to the resident and it was not signed out on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). When the resident returned to the facility the medication was given to the resident for the second time. The facility census was 48 residents. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 6/29/2023, showed: -Purpose was to administer medications at approximate times as an individual would in their home environment while continuing to comply with physician orders. -The policy was to assure that prescribed medications…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,021 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-07-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $597K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO