No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hope Care Center

115 East 83rd Street, Kansas City, MO 64114 · Non profit - Corporation · 16 certified beds · (816) 523-3988 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Call the home — (816) 523-3988 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Jun 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (27) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8434 Ward Pkwy · (816) 427-1598 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
315 W 75th St · (816) 361-4639 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
8325 Wornall Rd · (816) 521-1535 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(816) 513-8930 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
8510 Wornall Rd · (816) 363-4888

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.4%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%5.3%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%18.5%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.5%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication3.6%25.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%4.5%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.8%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.5%23.5%17.1%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

0.68
RN hours/ resident / day
1.42
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.42
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.51
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.72
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 16 beds and averages 15.7 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.82 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-09)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate sanitation of dish and cookware when the facility's dish machine was not dispensing an adequate amount of chemicals to sanitize the food prep and service items. The facility census was 16 residents.A policy regarding dishwasher maintenance or chemical disinfecting was requested and not received.1. Review of the facility's blank Daily Dietary Checklist, undated, showed the kitchen staff were to record water temperature and parts per million (PPM-a unit of concentration that expresses the amount of a substance within a million parts of a solution or mixture) of the sanitizer agent.Review of the facility's dishwasher manufacturers operation manual, undated, showed the minimum PPM chlorine (a chemical used as a disinfectant in water, a bleaching agent) required was 50 PPM.Review of the facility's Dish Machine Log dated August 2025, showed the dishwasher PPM was documented daily as 110 to 70 throughout the month.Observation on 9/4/2025 at 9:55 A.M., showed:-A dishwasher chemical sanitization test…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-09 · tag F0924 — pattern
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain two handrails firmly attached to the wall outside of resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. This practice potentially affected at least 4 residents who resided in those rooms. The facility census was 16 residents.1. Observation on 9/5/24 at 11:38 A.M. and on 9/8/25 at 11:17 A.M., showed two handrails outside of resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] which were not firmly attached to the wall.During an interview on 9/8/25 at 11:17 A.M., the Maintenance Director said:-The handrail had not been loose that long.-A resident from resident room [ROOM NUMBER] used the handrail when he/she left his/her room.During an interview on 9/9/25 at 2:25 P.M., the Maintenance Supervisor said the handrails were checked once per month.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prevent the presence of a black substance on the ceiling and failed to repair an eight foot (ft.) long area where a black substance leaked from the ceiling of Furnace room [ROOM NUMBER]. The facility also failed to maintain an outdoor handrail supporting system outside of the kitchen in good repair due to the crumbling of the concrete area which supported that handrail. This practice affected one non-resident use area and at least 7 residents who resided in that area of the facility, that would use the exit discharge (the portion of the means of egress between the building exit and the public way, street, alley, or other similar parcel of land essentially open to the outside air deeded, dedicated, or otherwise permanently appropriated for public use) which went through the service area next to the kitchen. The facility census was 16 residents.1. Observation on 9/8/25 at 9:59 A.M., with the Maintenance Director of furnace room [ROOM NUMBER], showed:-The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to retain operable thermometers in all refrigerators and/or freezers to confirm adequate temperature ranges; failed to maintain plastic cutting boards in good condition to avoid food safety hazards (cross-contamination); and failed to separate damaged foodstuffs, in accordance with State of Missouri rules and regulations, established national guidelines, and professional standards for food service safety. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who ate food from the kitchen. The facility's census was 13 residents with a licensed capacity for 16 residents at the time of the survey. 1. Observations on 6/11/24 at 10:53 A.M., during the facility basement inspection, showed there was no thermometer in the freezer in the Food Storage room. Observations on 6/11/24 at 11:16 A.M., showed there was a 7 pound (lb.) 3 ounce (oz.) can of baked beans that was dented on one side and stored on a shelf with other various undented cans. Observations on 6/12/24 at 9:18 A.M., during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain a comprehensive infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of Legionella (a [NAME] of pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria that includes the species L. pneumophila, causing legionellosis, all illnesses caused by Legionella, including a pneumonia-type illness called Legionnaires' disease and a mild flu-like illness called Pontiac fever) and/or other water-borne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease), and failed to provide documented assessments for such an outbreak with accepted response protocols, in accordance with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who resided, visited, used, or worked in the facility. The facility census was 13 residents with a licensed capacity for 16 residents at the time of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow facility policies and procedures for checking the Nurse Aide Registry for federal indicators of abuse as part of the Criminal Background Check (CBC) and in accordance with state requirements for two of four employees sampled for the criminal background screening. The facility census was 13 residents. Review of the facility's revised Abuse and Neglect policy and procedure dated 1/1/2024, showed: -All potential employees will be screened and trained to ensure that individuals with a documented history of abuse or other inappropriate conduct are not hired, and that all employees are properly trained regarding abuse of residents. -All employees will be screened prior to contact with facility residents, and quarterly, as follows: Federal Indicator List. 1. Review of two employee records showed: -Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B was hired on 2/5/24, and there was no Nurse Aide Registry Check completed. -Cook A was hired on 4/8/24, and there was no Nurse Aide Registry Check completed. During an interview on 6/12/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the annual comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool to be completed by facility staff for care planning) were completed timely for four sampled residents (Residents #59, #57, #1, #4) out of 8 sampled residents and one supplemental resident (Resident #160). The facility census was 13 residents. 1. Review of Resident #59's Face Sheet showed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD-a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event), malnutrition, depression, high blood pressure, diabetes, low back pain and neuropathy (weakness, numbness, and pain from nerve damage, usually in the hands and feet). Review of the resident's MDS assessments showed: -The resident's last annual assessment was dated 5/3/23. -The resident's annual assessment was due on 5/3/24. The electronic medical record showed this assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Sets (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool to be completed by facility staff for care planning) were completed quarterly for 8 residents (Residents #3, #5, #59, #57, #4, #1, #2, and #161) out of 8 sampled residents. The facility census was 13 residents. 1. Review of Resident #3's Face Sheet showed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, diabetes, vitamin deficiency, glaucoma (a disease that damages your eye's optic nerve that can cause blindness), high blood pressure, heart disease, paraplegia (paralysis that affects all or part of the trunk, legs, and pelvic organs), pain and edema (fluid in the tissues). Review of the resident's MDS assessments showed: -The resident's last Annual assessment was completed on 6/25/2023. -The resident's Quarterly assessment was due on 3/27/24. It was not completed and showed in the electronic medical record as being 63 days overdue. 2. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with a rate less than 5%. Facility staff made eight medication errors out of 29 attempts, resulting in a medication error rate of 27.59%. This affected three of seven sampled residents (Residents #2, #4, and #160) for medication pass. The facility census was 13. A facility policy titled Medication Administration-General Guidelines, dated 9/1/2006, showed: -Medications were to be administered per physician orders. -Medications were to be administered within 60 minutes of the ordered time. -The individual who administered the medication was to document the administration directly after the medication was given. 1. Resident #160's Physician Order Sheet (POS), obtained 6/13/24, showed: -An order for Carbidopa-Levodopa (a medication given for tremors) 25 milligrams (mg) Carbidopa/100 mg Levodopa, four times daily (9:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M., 5:00 P.M., and 9:00 P.M.) -An order for Lorazepam (a controlled medication given for anxiety) 0.5 mg, three times daily (between 7:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the completion of a necessary significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment) for one resident with a hospice admission (Resident #161) out of 8 sampled residents. The facility census was 13. Review of a facility policy titled Minimum Data Set Assessments, dated 6/13/24, lacked information regarding triggering an MDS assessment and timing of assessments. Review of the MDS 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual (a federally published guide for facility staff to complete and submit MDS assessments accurately and timely) instructed facilities to set a Significant Change Assessment Reference Date (ARD, the date of assessment initiation) no later than 14 days following the determination that a significant change had occurred. The RAI includes a hospice admission as a significant change and guides facilities to complete a Significant Change MDS assessment. 1. Review of Resident #161's Progress Note dated 4/10/24 at 1:13 P.M., showed the resident was admitted to Hospice A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 17 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plans were updated as residents' care and needs changed for two sampled residents (Residents #59 and #161) out of 8 sampled residents. The facility census was 13 residents. 1. Review of Resident #59's Face Sheet showed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD-a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event), malnutrition, depression, high blood pressure, diabetes, low back pain and neuropathy (weakness, numbness, and pain from nerve damage, usually in the hands and feet). Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool to be completed by facility staff for care planning, dated 11/3/23, showed the resident: -Was alert and oriented with no confusion or behaviors. -Had no upper or lower extremity impairments and ambulated independently. -The resident had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transcribe medication orders accurately and periodically reconcile physician orders when an antipsychotic medication was added to a resident's medical record without an order for one resident (Resident #161) of 5 residents sampled for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 13. A policy for order transcription and medication reconciliation was requested on 6/13/24 but was not received prior to exit. 1. Review of #161's face sheet showed diagnoses including seizures, dementia without behavioral disturbances, adjustment disorder (excessive reactions to stress that involve negative thoughts, strong emotions, and changes in behavior), stroke, and insomnia (difficulty sleeping). Review of the resident's hospice facility admission orders, dated 4/10/24 and signed by a hospice Registered Nurse (RN), showed: -The resident was admitted to hospice services on 4/10/24. -A section of the orders titled Comfort Kit orders had standing orders and instructions to circle NO for all declined orders and draw a line through the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure initial and quarterly smoking assessments were completed to establish a resident's capacity for smoking and establish a baseline for the resident's ability to smoke, determine assistance as necessary, and ensure safe smoking habits were in place and continuing for two sampled residents (Residents #3 and #59) out of 9 residents who smoked in the facility. The resident sample was 8 residents. The facility census was 13 residents. Review of the facility Smoking policy and procedure, dated 9/25/23, showed the purpose was to establish a healthy environment for residents, visitors and employees. Additionally, the facility must comply with federal, state and local regulations regarding smoking in healthcare facilities. The policy showed: -Residents may smoke outside of the building in designated areas and away from the facility's exterior doors. -Employees are responsible for reminding residents, visitors and other employees of the smoking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered without significant errors when staff administered Lorazepam (a controlled medication given for anxiety) two times within one and one-half hours. This affected one resident (Resident #160) out of seven sampled residents for medication pass. The facility census was 13. A facility policy titled Medication Administration-General Guidelines, dated 9/1/2006, showed: -Medications were to be administered per physician orders. -Medications were to be administered within 60 minutes of the ordered time. -The individual who administered the medication was to document the administration directly after the medication was given. 1. Review of Resident #160's Physician Order Sheet (POS), obtained 6/13/24, showed: -An order for Carbidopa-Levodopa (a medication given for tremors) 25 milligrams (mg) Carbidopa/100 mg Levodopa, four times daily (9:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M., 5:00 P.M., and 9:00 P.M.) -An order for Lorazepam (a controlled medication given for anxiety) 0.5 mg, three times daily (between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the floor area behind and under the dishwasher free of food debris and grime;to maintain the floor behind the reach in fridge with the clear glass, free of food debris; to maintain the toaster free of a heavy buildup of bread crumbs; to maintain the six burner stove free from a buildup of burnt--on grime; to prevent a buildup of dust on sprinkler head and the emergency light fixture in the kitchen; to maintain the gasket (a piece of rubber or some other material that is used to make a tight seal between two parts that are joined together) of a freezer in storage room [ROOM NUMBER] in good repair; to prevent an opened bag of corn meal from being stored in dietary storage room [ROOM NUMBER]; to maintain the floor of dietary storage room free of debris; and to ensure the Dietary Aide (DA) A checked the temperature of a hamburger, a potentially hazardous food (PHF - foods that must be kept at a particular temperature to minimize the growth of food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-27 · tag F0924 — widespread
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the handrails located at the following locations: outside resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], outside resident room [ROOM NUMBER], between resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], and between resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. The facility census was 14 residents. 1. Observations with the Maintenance Director (MD) on 1/26/23, showed: - At 12:09 P.M., the two hand rails outside resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], moved back and forth when they were held. - At 12:14 P.M., the hand rail outside resident room [ROOM NUMBER], moved back and forth, when it was held. - At 12:20 P.M., the hand rail on the wall between resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], moved back and forth when it was held. - At 12:29 P.M., the hand rail on the wall outside resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], moved back and forth when it was held. During an interview on 1/30/23 at 2:22 P.M., the MD said he/she: - Checked the hand rails as he/she walked by the hand rails. - Checked the handrails as much as he/she could.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the wall mounted fans in resident rooms 10, 11, 8, 12, 7, 4 and 2 free of a heavy buildup of dust and to maintain a stand-up lift used to transfer one sampled resident (Resident #6) free from a crack in the base out of nine sampled residents. The facility census was 14 residents. 1. Observations with the Maintenance Director (MD) on 1/26/23 between 11:10 A.M. to 12:29 P.M., showed resident's rooms 10, 11, 9, 12, 8, 7, 4 and 2 had wall mounted fans and all had a heavy build up of dust on the fan blades and plastic grate. Record review of Resident #214's, quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by the facility for care planning) dated 4/15/22, showed he/she was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - an assessment tool that shows a score between 3 of 15 which shows the resident's mental status. This tool helps determine the resident ' s attention, orientation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-27 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper behavioral health management was implemented and support services were offered to assist in promoting healthy psychosocial functioning and failed to initiate interventions that would prevent negative interactions/incidents between two sampled residents (Resident #4 and #10) who were in a relationship, and two sampled residents (Resident #4 and Resident #12), who had a physical altercation out of nine sampled residents. The facility census was 14 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #4's undated face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: -Other Recurrent Depressive Disorders (a mental health disorder characterized by a feeling of profound and persistent sadness or disrepair and is frequently accompanied by a loss of interest in things that were once pleasurable). -Other Psychoactive Substance Abuse, Uncomplicated (A drug or other substance that affects how the brain works and causes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an exhaust pipe in the attic space over the storage room, in good repair to prevent that pipe from emitting steam into the attic area. This practice potentially affected at least five residents who resided in that part of the facility. The facility census was 14 residents. 1. Observation with the Maintenance Director (MD) on 1/26/23 at 10:43 A.M., showed: - One exhaust pipe in the attic area which emitted steam which caused several of the nearby wood beams to become wet. - The pipe was warm when it was held. During an interview on 1/26/23 at 10:47 A.M., the MD said that pipe came from the furnace room and he/she did not know that pipe emitted steam which could possibly cause some decay on the wood beams.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-27 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman (a network of ombudsmen volunteers serving residents of nursing homes and residential care facilities to provide support and assistance with their problems or complaints) for one sampled resident's (Resident #1) discharge to the hospital out of nine sampled residents. The facility census was 14 residents. Record review of the facility's undated Bed Hold policy and procedure showed: -Documentation related to the resident's bed hold rights and financial responsibilities and the responsibilities of the facility regarding bed holds. -The document did not show that part of the policy was to notify the Ombudsman of all discharges/transfers from the facility and it did not show that notification should be completed at least monthly. 1. Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet showed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV- a virus that attacks the body's immune system, preventing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-27 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the bed hold notice was provided to one sampled resident (Resident #1) or his/her responsible party when he/she was sent to the hospital, out of nine sampled residents. The facility census was 14 residents. Record review of the facility's undated Bed Hold policy and procedure showed: -A resident's bed will be held without charge for up to three days for each hospitalization. Thereafter, a resident will be charged the then current normal daily room rate for each day. -Residents who have a reserved bed during their hospitalization will be re-admitted to the facility immediately upon discharge from the hospital if the facility can continue to meet the needs of the resident and if payment of the then current daily rate for each day of hospitalization has been made. -Residents who do not have a reserved bed will be assessed upon discharge from the hospital if the facility can continue to meet the needs of the resident. If no bed is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-27 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning) was completed and submitted timely for one sampled resident (Resident #214) out of nine sampled residents. The facility census was 14 residents. Record review of the facility's policy titled Resident Assessments, dated November 2019, showed MDS assessments were to be conducted at time of admission, quarterly, and with any change in condition. 1. Record review of Resident #214's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of the resident's Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) MDS database submissions showed: -An Annual MDS assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/14/22. -A Quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 4/15/22. -NOTE: No MDS assessments of any type had been completed for the resident since April 2022. Record review of the resident's facility electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive-care-plan was reassessed and updated to indicate adequate and appropriate interventions to meet the resident's medical, mental, and psychosocial needs specifically for the consumption of alcohol and the subsequent behaviors exhibited for two sampled residents (Resident #4 and #10) out of nine sampled residents. The facility census was 14 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #4's undated face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: -Other Recurrent Depressive Disorders (a mental health disorder characterized by a feeling of profound and persistent sadness or disrepair and is frequently accompanied by a loss of interest in things that were once pleasurable). -Other Psychoactive Substance Abuse, Uncomplicated (A drug or other substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior). Record review of the resident's social service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-27 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to acknowledge, assess and provide supportive services for one sampled resident (Resident #1), who informed staff of past trauma, and to develop a care plan that showed interventions the facility staff would take to try to protect the resident and prevent trauma from recurring, out of nine sampled residents. The facility census was 14 residents. The facility did not have a behavior management policy/procedure. 1. Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including depression. There was no documentation showing the resident had a diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a psychiatric disorder that may occur in people who have experienced or witnessed a traumatic event. Symptoms may include nightmares or unwanted memories of the trauma, avoidance of situations that bring back memories of the trauma, heightened reactions, anxiety, or depressed mood). Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-27 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician's order for the use of two half side rails; and to complete a comprehensive side rail safety assessment to determine if the two half side rails were a restrainting device for one sampled resident (Resident #8) who had impaired bed mobility out of nine sampled residents. The facility census was 14 residents. Record review of the Facility Physical Restraint policy dated 10/14/19 showed: -Required to have a physician's order for use of any restraints to include when the restraints are to be used, type of restraints and medical symptoms for use and the purpose of the resident restraints. An example would be use of side rails (metal or plastic bars positioned along the side of a bed, also commonly known as side rails) to increase bed mobility (is the moving to and from a lying position, turning from side-to-side and positioning the body while in bed). -The interdisciplinary team (IDT) will document evidence in the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-27 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate and adequate social service assistance specifically for psychiatric and alcohol abuse treatment was provided for one sampled resident (Resident #4) out of nine sampled residents. The facility census was 14 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #4's undated face sheet showed the resident admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: -Other Recurrent Depressive Disorders (a mental health disorder characterized by a feeling of profound and persistent sadness or disrepair and is frequently accompanied by a loss of interest in things that were once pleasurable). -Other Psychoactive Substance Abuse, Uncomplicated (A drug or other substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior). Record review of the resident's progress note dated 10/15/22 showed the resident was very inebriated. (effected by alcohol or drugs especially to the point where physical and mental control is markedly diminished). Record review of the resident's progress note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were recipes available for dietary staff to process recipes for the pureed (cooked food that has been ground pressed, blended or sieved to the consistency of a creamy paste or liquid) items of the meal and to follow the menu for the following meals due to the ingredients not being available: the lunch meal on 1/23/23, the supper meal on 1/24/23, and the lunch meal on 1/25/23. The facility census was 14 residents. 1. Observation on 1/24/23 at 11:55 A.M., showed: -The Dietary Manager (DM) placed one serving of taco meat (with no other liquid or ingredients) into the food processor and pureed the taco meat. - There was open recipe book for pureed food. - During a taste test with the DM, the texture of the taco meat was not a smooth texture, and was still gritty as confirmed with the DM. During an interview on 1/24/23 at 12:23 P.M., the DM said he/she may not have a recipe book for the pureed version of today's meal. He/she looked but did not find a recipe for the pureed items of that meal. 2. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 26A443. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next