No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Kingswood Senior Living

10000 Wornall Road, Kansas City, MO 64114 · Non profit - Other · 86 certified beds · (816) 942-0994 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (816) 942-0994 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citations (F0568, F0569, F0570)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$14,069 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569, F0570)
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $14,069 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-22)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1148 West 103rd Street, Suite B · (816) 287-0889 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
10205 State Line Rd · (816) 942-0134 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1030 W 103rd St · (816) 942-4200 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1030 W 103rd St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.8%18.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.3%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.5%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%18.5%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%4.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.1%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.1%25.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.5%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.7%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.4%23.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.0%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.0%63.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.8%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.6%13.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.552.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.482.331.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 144 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

67.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
46.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.42U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 46.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF67.9%CMS range 58.2–74.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 7.3–13.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge46.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened8.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.4–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
1.12
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.40
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.03
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
55.2%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 46.0 residents a day — about 53% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.13 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-18)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to follow facility policy for using mechanical lifts for one sampled resident, (Resident #1) out of five sampled residents. Facility staff failed to use two staff to transfer the resident using a Hoyer lift (a medical device used to assist lifting and transferring individuals with limited mobility) and failed to inspect the lift sling for safety on 2/26/25. During the transfer, the sling strap broke and the resident fell to the floor. The resident sustained a subdural hematoma (a type of bleeding that occurs inside the skull in the outermost membrane surrounding the brain) and a fractured right hip and was admitted to the hospital intensive care unit (ICU). The facility census was 59 residents. The Director of Nursing (DON) was notified on 3/4/25 at 5:12 P.M. of the past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 2/26/25. The administrator and DON inspected all lift slings being used by residents. The administrator and maintenance director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness of the floors around and under equipment in the main kitchen and around the counters in Satellite Kitchen #3; failed to ensure in the main kitchen the bins that contained dried items (sugar, flour, and cereal) did not have grime and debris on them; failed to ensure in Satellite Kitchen #3 there was not a black substance potentially mold in the juice machine around the tops of the juice nozzles, coffee debris around the coffee nozzles, and dried spills on both sides of the serving station walls. This practice potentially affected all residents. The facility census was 56 residents. The facility did not provide a sanitation policy. 1. Observation on 6/16/25 at 2:41 P.M., of the initial main kitchen showed the following: -Bins that contained dried items (sugar, flour, cereal) had grime and debris on them. -Dirt and food debris on the floor, under, around, behind and in front of the equipment, some exampled areas were the oven, three compartment sink, preparation table with preparation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of Resident #5's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed the following staff assessment of the resident: -Moderate cognition impairment. -Required assistance from staff with his/her activities of daily living (ADL bathing, transfers, toileting, mobility). -No pain indicated. -Application of medications other than to feet. -Application of dressings to feet. Review of the resident's POS dated June 2025 showed: -Enhanced Barrier Precautions. -Wound treatment three times a week and as needed if dressing becomes soiled or if the dressing comes off. --Open area to mid back. Review of the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated June 2025 showed: -Calcium Alginate (brown seaweed and used in various applications due to its unique properties. It is particularly known for its use in wound care dressings due to its high absorbency and ability to form a gel-like substance) three times a week and as needed if dressing becomes soiled or if the dressing comes off to mid back. Review of the resident's current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #28's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], section N0415 showed: -The resident was taking an anticoagulant (medication that prevents the blood from clotting). -The resident was taking an antiplatelet (medication that prevents the platelets in blood from collecting and forming clots). Review of the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 6/18/25, showed: -There were no orders for anticoagulant medications. -There were no orders for antiplatelet medications. - A physician's order, for Aspirin (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug NSAID) 81 milligram (mg) tablet, delayed release enteric coated (EC a barrier to prevent the gastric acids in the stomach from dissolving or degrading drugs after you swallow them) once daily by mouth (po) for prophylaxis (as a preventative measure) dated 3/7/25. --This drug is an NSAID by class. ---This drug is not classified as an anticoagulant or antiplatelet. During an interview on 6/18/25 at 12:17 P.M., the MDS Coordinator said: -The MDS should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure weekly skin checks were completed and documented; failed to communicate new pressure injury to physician and dietician; failed to ensure that wound care treatments were in place, completed and documented, for one sampled resident (Resident #28) out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 56 residents. A review of the facility's policy titled Pressure Ulcer/Skin Breakdown Clinical Protocol dated April 2018 showed: -The nurse shall describe, document, and report the following: --Full assessment of pressure sore including location, stage, length, width, depth, presence of exudates or necrotic tissue. --Pain assessment. --Resident's mobility status. --Current treatments including support surfaces. --All active diagnoses -The physician will order pertinent wound treatments, including pressure reduction surfaces, wound cleansing and debridement approaches, dressings, and application of topical agents. -During resident visits, the physician will evaluate and document the progress of wound healing. 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately treat pain for one sampled resident (Resident #163) who expressed pain out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 56 residents. Review of the facility's Pain policy and procedure dated October 2022, showed the physician and staff will identify individuals who have pain or who are at risk for having pain. Policy and procedures showed: -The nursing staff will assess each individual for pain upon admission to the facility, at the quarterly review, whenever there is a significant change in condition, when there is an onset of new pain or worsening of existing pain. -The staff will identify the characteristics of pain such as location, intensity, frequency, pattern and severity. -The nursing staff will identify any situations where an increase in pain may be anticipated; for example, wound care, ambulation or repositioning. -With input from the resident to the extent possible, the physician and staff will establish goals of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete orders for dialysis (a medical procedure that filters and cleanses the blood of patients whose kidneys are not functioning properly), were on the Physician Order Sheet (POS) and documented in the care plan for one sampled resident (Resident #163) out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 56 residents. Review of the facility Dialysis policy and procedure dated February 2023, showed there was no documentation or procedure regarding physician's orders for residents who receive dialysis and what the physician's order should include. 1. Review of Resident #163's Face Sheet showed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including hip fracture, bladder cancer, kidney disease, acute kidney failure, and acute pain due to trauma. Review of the resident's POS dated June 2025, showed physician's orders for: -Renvela 800 milligrams (mg) three times daily for kidney disease (start date 6/6/25). -Complete pre and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the large fan in the laundry room free of a heavy buildup of dust which caused the fan to blow dust towards the laundry staff and the folding area of the laundry. The facility census was 56 residents. 1. Observation on 6/17/25 at 2:23 P.M., showed a heavy buildup of dust on the blades of the fan in the laundry. During an interview on 6/17/25 at 2:24 P.M., Maintenance Assistant B said he/she did not know the last time the fan was cleaned.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0923 — isolated
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was negative air flow in the 1st floor soiled utility room. The facility census was 56 residents. 1. Observation on 6/17/25 at 2:05 showed the absence of negative air flow from the 1st floor as required in a soiled utility room as evidenced by using two different tissue papers to check if the vent was drawing the paper up. During an interview on 6/17/25 at 2:07 P.M., the Director of Facility Operations said he/she was not sure how long that soiled utility room was without negative air flow.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #1) was treated with dignity and respect when on 5/14/25 Registered Nurse (RN) A grabbed the resident's arm, held it in place while the resident was resisting care resulting in a moon shaped skin tear out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 55 residents. The Administrator was notified on 5/22/25 at 5:12 P.M. of the past noncompliance which began on 5/14/25. The facility in-serviced all staff on the facility's resident rights, abuse and neglect policies. RN A was terminated on 5/16/25. The deficiency was corrected on 5/14/25. Review of the facility Resident Rights Policy dated 2001, revised in 2/2021 showed: -Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. -These rights include but not limited to: --A dignified existence. --Self-determination. --Exercise his/her rights as a resident as a resident of the facility and as a resident or citizen of the United States. --Exercise his/her rights without interference, coercion, discrimination…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician, Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON) and/or the resident representative of one resident's (Resident #1) changes in skin condition resulting in a delay in treatment out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility Change in a Resident's Condition or Status dated 2/2021 showed: -Our facility promptly notifies the resident, his/her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. -The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been a(n) significant change in the resident's physical, emotional, or mental condition and the need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly. -Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, a nurse will notify the resident's representative when there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed, updated and/or revised for two sampled residents (Residents #1 and #3) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 03/2022 showed: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. -The comprehensive, person-centered care plan: --Includes measurable objectives and timeframe's. --Describes the services that to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. --Reflects currently recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions. -Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the resident's conditions change. Review of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure weekly skin/wound assessments, wound assessments included a detailed description and measurements of the pressure ulcer/injury (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction), and to notify the resident's physician of a new pressure ulcer to obtain treatment orders in a timely manner for one sampled resident (Resident #1) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility Pressure Injury Risk assessment dated 3/2020 showed: -The risk assessment should be conducted as soon as possible after admission, but no later than eight hours after admission is completed. -Once the assessment is conducted and risk factors are identified and characterized, a resident-centered care plan can be created to address the modifiable risks for pressure injuries. -Repeat the risk assessment weekly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Dietitian (RD) was in the facility to perform dietary assessments and to consult with dietary staff in the kitchen. This practice affected two sampled residents (Residents #1 and #2) who needed dietary assessments during the time span when there was no RD coming to the facility out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 67 residents. Review of the facility Dietitian policy dated 11/2022 showed: -A qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional will help oversee food and nutrition services provided to the residents. -The dietitian or nutrition professional may be a full time or part time consultant or an employee depending on the current requirements of the facility. --The requirements are based on: ---Assessments and care plans of resident nutritional needs. ---The over all facility assessment of the number, acuity and diagnoses of the resident population. -Our facility's dietitian is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the ceiling tiles, light fixtures, and sprinkler heads, which were over the food preparation table and the dishwasher area, free of a dust buildup. This practice potentially affected all residents who ate food prepared in the kitchen. The facility census was 58 residents. 1. Observation on 9/25/23 at 9:42 A.M., showed a buildup of dust on the sprinkler head on the ceiling close to the food preparation area. Observation on 9/25/23 at 9:43 A.M., showed a dust buildup on the ceiling tiles and on the light fixtures over the food preparation table. Observation on 9/25/23 at 9:47 A.M., showed a buildup on the ceiling tiles and on the light fixtures over the dishwasher area. During an interview on 9/25/23 at 1:01 P.M., the Director of Dining Services said there was a utility person that cleaned the ceiling tiles and light fixtures every month. During an interview on 9/25/23 at 1:03 P.M. the Dietary Utility Person said he/she had not yet cleaned the ceiling tiles and light fixtures over the dishwasher area.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #44's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including shortness of breath, respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), heart failure, kidney disease, fluid overload and cellulitis (a common bacterial skin infection that causes redness, swelling, and pain in the infected area of the skin). Review of the resident's annual MDS dated [DATE], showed the resident: -Was alert and oriented. -Needed extensive assistance with bathing and hygiene, limited assistance with dressing and toileting. -Needed supervision with ambulation and was able to mobilize in a wheelchair. -Had no skin problems or other wounds. -Received ointment treatments and application of dressings to his/her feet and other areas (other than feet). Observation on 9/25/23 at 9:45 A.M., showed the resident was sitting in his/her wheelchair with oxygen on. He/she had a wound on his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to do or maintain the beauty shop ceiling vent free from a dust buildup; to maintain the floor in the 1st floor east kitchenette free from a buildup of rust and water; maintain the restroom ceiling vent in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] free from a buildup of dust; to maintain resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] free from a buildup of cobwebs; to maintain the floor in the 2nd floor west kitchenette free from a a buildup of debris; failed to maintain hot water temperatures at or close to 105 ºF (degrees Fahrenheit) in resident rooms 123, 114, 212, 223 and 216 for two days of the survey. This practice potentially affected at least 35 residents who resided in or used those areas. The facility census was 58 residents. 1. Observation on 9/26/23 with the Director of Facility Operations showed: -At 1:55 P.M., there was a buildup of dust inside the ceiling vent in the beauty shop. -At 2:16 P.M., there was a buildup of water and rust behind the ice machine in the 1st floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to document a comprehensive assessment for a suprapubic (S/P) catheter (a urinary bladder catheter inserted through the skin about one inch above the symphysis pubis) stoma (surgical opening) site weekly for two sampled residents (Resident #23 and #35); to document a suprapubic catheter change on 8/1/23 and on 9/1/23 for one sample resident (Resident #23); to ensure a dignity bag (a bag that the drainage bag is placed into to prevent contamination and other people seeing the urine) was placed for three sampled residents (Resident #19, #4, and #35); to complete physician's ordered cares to the catheter for three sampled residents (Resident #19, #4, and #35); to ensure the drainage bag was managed appropriately to prevent infection for two sampled residents (Resident #35 and #4); to ensure a comprehensive care plan included the type of catheter, location for one sampled resident (Resident #23); and to follow physician's orders regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was properly stored for four sampled residents (Resident #44, #10, #35, and #20), and failed to care plan the use of respiratory equipment for three sampled residents (Resident #44, #35, and #20) out of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 58 residents. Review of the facility's policy, titled Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP-a method of respiratory therapy in which air is pumped into the lungs through the nose or nose and mouth during spontaneous breathing)/Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPap-a type of device that helps with breathing) Support dated March 2015, showed: -Staff were to clean Cpap and BiPap masks with warm, soapy water for five minutes, rinse with warm water, and allow it to air dry. A copy of the facility's respiratory equipment storage policy was not received at time of exit. Review of the facility's policy, titled Goals and Objectives, Care Plans dated April 2009, showed:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide justification for re-implementing an elopement risk device (a bracelet that the resident wears that is used to keep track of resident and provides the facility an additional layer of security that allows sensors on doors to alarm when the resident attempts to exit) and to care plan the device for one sampled resident (Resident #46) out of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 58 residents. Review of the facility's undated elopement risk device policy and procedure showed: -Wander guard placement was determined by resident assessment, history of wandering or getting lost or turned around. -Assessments should be done quarterly or as needed. -Residents were provided a bracelet by the facility. -Wander guard placement would be care planned. 1. Review of Resident #46's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including: -Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include the amount of $4,281.75 in the reconciliation (the process of verifying two sets of records to ensure consistency and accuracy) calculations which were completed in June 2023 for one discharged resident (Resident #500) and to obtain a resident signature or other evidence of the resident's approval for a check written for $375.00 for one sampled resident (Resident #2) account. This practice affected one discharged resident (Resident #500) and one sampled resident (Resident #2) out of two sampled residents who allowed the facility to hold funds. The facility census was 58 residents. 1. Review of Resident #500's discharge records showed he/she moved away from the facility on 1/10/23. Review of the resident's trust fund monthly statement showed a check dated 6/16/23, which was written for $4,281.75 to return the resident's money to Social Security. Review of the reconciliation worksheet dated 6/1/23 through 6/30/23, showed the $4,281.75, was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit a Third Party Liability (TPL) form within 30 days of death, to Missouri Health Net for one deceased resident (Resident #501). The facility census was 58 residents. 1. Review of Resident #501's medical records showed the resident passed away on [DATE], which was 113 days prior to the resident fund review on [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:23 the Director of Finance said: -The resident received Medicaid as a part of his/her funding for his/her stay at the facility. - A TPL form should have been filled out since the resident passed away.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0570 — isolated
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a surety bond sufficient to ensure the protection of resident funds. The facility census was 58 residents. 1. Review of the facility maintained Resident Trust Reconciliation on 9/29/23, showed an average monthly balance of $ 7,894.03. During an interview on 9/26/23 at 10:42 A.M., the Director of Finance said the surety bond was updated two years ago and he/she would really have to look at the balances. Review of the facility's Surety Cancellation and Nonrenewal Notice on 10/19/23, showed the Notice was dated 7/1/23, received by the Department of Health & Senior Services on 8/3/23 and cancelled the surety bond effective 10/2/23, making the surety bond insuffiecient by $12,000.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative therapy (therapy given to either reach a higher level or maintain a current level of functioning) services as ordered for one sampled resident (Resident #48) out of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 58 residents. Review of the facility's policy, titled Restorative Nursing Services dated July 2017, showed: -Restorative therapy may or may not be accompanied by formal rehabilitation services such as Physical Therapy (PT-therapy that is used to preserve, enhance, or restore movement and physical function impaired by disease, injury, or disability), Occupational Therapy (OT-therapy that is used to promote independence in activities of daily living), and Speech Therapy (ST-therapeutic treatment of impairments related to communication and swallowing). 1. Review of Resident #48's face sheet showed he/she was admitted with a diagnosis of muscle wasting of his/her right and left lower leg. Review of the resident's PT Progress and Discharge Summary, signed 7/12/23, showed: -The Physical Therapist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and document a comprehensive initial assessment of the resident's leg wounds and comprehensive ongoing assessments of the resident's leg wounds; to care plan the resident had cellulitis that was being treated; and to use proper skin issues and treatments for one sampled resident (Resident #44) out of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 58 residents. 1. Review of Resident #44's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including shortness of breath, respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), heart failure, kidney disease, fluid overload and cellulitis (a common bacterial skin infection that causes redness, swelling, and pain in the infected area of the skin). Review of the resident's Nursing Notes showed on 8/16/23, the resident's skin assessment was completed. The resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident prior to and after dialysis (a mechanical way to filter the blood and remove waste when the kidneys stop functioning) for one sampled resident (Resident #20) out of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 58 residents. Review of the facility's undated policy, titled Pre/Post dialysis Nursing Assessment showed: -Staff were to create and fill out the Dialysis Nursing Pre/Post Assessment, print it out, and send it with the resident to dialysis. -Staff were to retrieve the form when the resident returned from dialysis and place it in the communication book. 1. Review of Resident #20's face sheet showed he/she was admitted with the following diagnoses: -End Stage Renal Disease (the kidneys no longer work as they should to meet the body's needs). -Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel) Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain dental services, care plan dental problems, and accurately record dental problems on the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) for one sampled resident (Resident #48) out of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 58 residents. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Dental Services showed: -Staff were to ensure residents received routine and emergency dental services. -The Social Services Designee (SSD) was to assist residents with arranging appointments, transportation, and reimbursement of dental services, if eligible. -Staff were to record all dental services provided in the resident's medical record. Review of the facility's policy, titled Goals and Objectives, Care Plans dated April 2009, showed: -Staff were to enter goals and objectives on each resident's care plan so that all disciplines had access to such information and were able to report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the mechanical soft chicken was maintained at or close to a temperature of 120 ºF (degrees Fahrenheit) for one supplemental resident (Resident #9) on the steam table and at the time of service. This practice affected one resident. The facility census was 58 residents. 1. Review of Resident #9's face sheet showed diagnoses which included hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), aphasia (having difficulty with their language or speech. It's usually caused by damage to the left side of the brain (for example, after a stroke), diabetes mellitus (when the body can't produce enough of a hormone called insulin, or the insulin it produces isn't effective in order to digest carbohydrates), generalized weakness, Review of the resident's Nutrition Risk assessment dated [DATE] showed: -A pertinent diagnosis of dysphagia (problems swallowing certain foods or liquids). -The resident was alert but unable to communicate. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label foods in the resident use refrigerator, with the name of the resident(s) those foods belonged to. This practice potentially affected two residents who had food in that resident use refrigerator. The facility census was 58 residents. Review of the facility's policy entitled Foods Brought by Family/Visitors dated 7/17, showed: -Policy Statement: Food brought to the facility by visitors and family was permitted. Facility staff would strive to balance resident choice and a homelike environment with the nutritional and safety needs of residents. -Family members and visitors were requested to inform nursing staff of their desire to bring foods into the facility. -Foods brought by family/visitors for individual residents may not be shared with or distributed to other residents. -Family/visitors were asked to prepare and transport food using safe food handling practices, including: safe cooling and reheating processes, holding temperatures, preventing cross-contamination with raw or undercooked foods; and hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prevent the presence of gnats (small flies) around the condiment area on a food storage shelf and under the dishwashing sink. This practice affected the kitchen. The facility census was 58 residents. 1. Observation on 9/25/23, showed the following: -At 9:29 A.M., many gnats flew around the shelf where the condiments were stored and containers of cider vinegar with several gnats in the cider vinegar -At 11:22 A.M., many gnats flew around the area under the dishwasher area, where there was grime on the pipes and a 1 foot (ft.) by long by 1 ft. wide opening in the wall under the dishwashing sink. During an interview on 9/25/23 at 1:07 P.M., the Director of Dining Service said he/she was not sure of the last time that area under the dishwasher was treated for gnats. During an interview on 9/26/23 at 1:45 P.M., the Director of Facility Operations said the opening on the wall under sink had existed for about a week prior to the survey and he/she saw that the wall needed to be repaired. He/she did not know the last time that area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the shift change narcotic (a drug that in moderate doses dulls the senses, relieves pain, and induces profound sleep but in excessive doses causes stupor, coma, or convulsions) count was completed and signed by both the on-coming and off-going nursing staff. The facility census was 52 residents. 1. Record review of the facilities Control Substances (a drug or other substance that is tightly controlled by the government because it may be abused or cause addiction) Policy revised December 2012 showed: -Nursing staff would count controlled medications at the end of each shift. -The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty would make the count together. -They would document the count and reported and discrepancies to the Director of Nursing (DON). Record review of 100 Hall Narcotic Card Count sheet dated 1/8/22 thru 1/15/22 showed: -One out of 28 opportunities were not signed by either the oncoming or off going staff. -One out of 28 opportunities where the number of medication cards is not listed. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent (%). Out of 26 observed medication opportunities, five errors occurred resulting in an error rate of 19.23%. One medication involved crushing contents of a timed release capsule (Resident #20); one error involved an inhaler medication (Resident #1), one error involved an eye drop medication (Resident #45), one error involved insulin administration (Resident #12) and one error involved time of administration (Resident #43). The facility census was 52 residents. Record review of eye drop and inhaler administration information from the Certified Medication Technician (CMT) Student Manual, revised 2008 showed: -Hold the lower eye lid away from the eye to form a pouch. -Instill the eye drop into the pouch. -With a finger, apply pressure to the inside corner of the eye for one minute. -Wait at least one minute before giving a second inhalation (if ordered) of the same inhaler medication.;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure breathing inhalers were labeled with resident's name on the inhaler; to ensure eye drop vials were dated and labeled when opened; to monitor the medication refrigerator temperatures to ensure temperatures were maintained at appropriate levels for one medication refrigerator out of two medication refrigerators and to ensure acidophilus (a supplement that is used to help maintain the number of healthy bacteria) was refrigerated after opening for one sampled resident, (Resident #1). The facility census was 52 residents. Record review of facilities policy on Labeling of Medication Containers revised April of 2019 showed all medications maintained in the facility were properly labeled in accordance with current state and federal guidelines and regulations. Record review of the facility Storage of Medication policy, revised April 2019 showed: -Drugs and biologicals used in the facility are stored under proper temperature, light and humidity controls. -Medications requiring refrigeration are stored in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: refrigerate open condiment containers; maintain in a sanitary condition a manual countertop can opener; keep cutting boards in good repair; keep spice containers clean an up-to-date; store foods covered, labeled and dated; ensure there were lids on trash cans available to use; and to ensure all kitchen food preparation employees were wearing hair restraints. These deficient practices of not practicing good hygienic and sanitation techniques and procedures, could potentially, promote microorganisms and bacterial growth which could adversely affect the health and well-being of the residents and staff who partook of the meals prepared by the dietary staff. The facility census was 52 residents at the time of the survey. 1. Observations on 4/18/22 between 5:35 A.M. and 8:38 A.M., in the kitchen, showed: -A one-half gallon container of soy sauce approximately ½ full that read, refrigerate after opening for quality, on the label, on a food shelf rack in the unrefrigerated, dry goods area. -A 4½ pound (approximately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-22 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) in writing of a transfer or discharge to a hospital, including the reasons for the transfer and to provide the Ombudsman (a resident advocate who provides support and assistance with problems and/or complaints regarding the facility) a copy of the notification for one sampled resident (Resident #9) out of 13 sampled residents and one closed record (Resident #49) out of two closed records. The facility census was 52 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #9's Profile Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of the facility investigation dated 12/21/21 showed the resident was sent to the hospital after stepping off a sit to stand lift (are designed to assist patients who have some mobility but need help to rise from a sitting position. They allow caregivers to easily move patients from one seated surface to another) during a transfer. Record review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-22 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative in writing of the facility bed hold policy at the time of transfer for one sampled resident (Resident #9) out of 13 sampled residents and one closed record (Resident #49) out of two closed records. The facility census was 52 residents. Record review of the facility's undated Bed Hold Policy showed: -If a resident was absent for up to 18 days, no additional costs would be charged. -The residence (bed) would be held for 18 days. 1. Record review of Resident #9's Profile Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of the facility investigation dated 12/21/21 showed the resident was sent to the hospital after stepping off a sit to stand lift (are designed to assist patients who have some mobility but need help to rise from a sitting position. They allow caregivers to easily move patients from one seated surface to another) during a transfer. Record review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure completion of one resident's (Resident #20) left hip pressure ulcer (a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) treatment and to clarify/discontinue a treatment for the resident's right hip once the wound was healed, out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 52 residents. Record review of the facility Pressure Ulcer/Skin Breakdown - Clinical Protocol, revised April 2018 showed: -The licensed nurse would document all current treatments. -The physician would order pertinent wound treatments, including wound cleansing and debridement (the removal of dead or infected skin tissue to help a wound heal) approaches, dressings, and application of topical agents (substances which are applied to a body surface/wound). 1. Record review of Resident #20's Profile Face Sheet showed his/her current admission date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. One medication error occurred involving failure to properly prime an insulin pen (priming means removing the air from the needle and cartridge and ensures the pen is working correctly - if the pen is not primed before each injection, too little or too much insulin may be injected) prior to administration of insulin for one sampled resident (Resident #12). The facility census was 56 residents. Record review of the facility Insulin Administration policy, revised September 2014 showed: -The nursing staff will have access to specific instructions (from the manufacturer if appropriate) on all forms of insulin delivery system(s) prior to their use. -Forms of insulin delivery included insulin pens. Record review of the facility Administering Medications policy, revised April 2019 showed: -Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders -The individual administering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$14,069 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $14,069 — penalty dated 2025-01-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 39%Medicare 11%Other / private 50%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$1,185per resident / day
operating cost
$36,010per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$343per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265795. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next