No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Parkview Healthcare

128 North Hardesty, Kansas City, MO 64123 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (816) 241-2020 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0740)4 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$121,672 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (96) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $121,672 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-17)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1730 Prospect Ave · (816) 404-5755 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.5 mi
5400 Independence Ave · (816) 231-0730 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4901 Saint John Ave · (816) 920-5307 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Budd Park<0.1 mi
5400 Saint John Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
134 N Hardesty Ave · (816) 328-3215

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased32.5%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.9%5.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.7%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened29.8%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.3%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.4%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.4%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.5%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.2%23.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication11.5%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine69.0%63.5%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

12.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.10U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.5%CMS range 8.2–17.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.25
RN hours/ resident / day
0.59
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.92
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.75
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.14
RN hoursweekends
44.8%
Total nursing turnover
18.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 102.6 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.75 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.84 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

28
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-21)
22
at the previous standard inspection (2023-04-26)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

96 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 79 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jdisputed · IIDR2026-02-17 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and behavioral health services per policy for three sampled residents (Residents #1, #2, and #3) who had a known history of substance abuse. The facility staff failed develop a plan of care related to behavioral health services for the use of illicit drug use needs based on the residents' Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- DA-124C, a required form to be submitted for any client who requests admission to a Medicaid certified bed regardless of the client's payment source) and failed to assess and ensure the interventions for the resident were in place and implemented by facility staff after each behavior of illicit drug use. As a result of the facility failure on [DATE] about 6:30 P.M., Resident #3 shared fentanyl (a potential synthetic opioid) smoked off a piece of foil with Resident# 1 (who had a legal guardian) and Resident #2, whom also had a history of substance abuse, and both Resident #1 and Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · L2023-08-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable and homelike environment for 11 sampled residents (Residents #304, #69,#600,#621, #617, #96, #601,#603, #18, #508 and #58) out of 17 sampled residents, when they complained that their rooms were hot or had temperatures above 81 degrees Fahrenheit (°F); failed to have a comprehensive monitoring system including documentation for the air temperatures within the resident rooms to maintain comfort level; to maintain documentation for all ongoing maintenance for cooling units in the facility and to conduct random monitoring, or keep record to ensure the comfort of residents in the building. These failures had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 110 residents. The Administrator was notified on 8/21/23 at 6:09 P.M., of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 8/18/23. The IJ was removed on 8/22/23, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility's Failure of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · L2023-08-30 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility administration failed to recognize the need to evacuate the facility after temperatures exceeded regulatory requirements for an extended amount of time and to ensure their emergency plan was developed to include all required components. Additionally, the facility failed to evacuate the residents in an orderly, organized manner, which included finding placement and transportation for residents, sending residents medical records, medications, code status, COVID 19 status, and staff with residents to the receiving facilities. The failures delayed evacuation and jeopardized the health and safety for all residents and staff. The facility census was 110 residents. The Administrator was notified on [DATE] at 10:15 A.M., of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on [DATE]. The IJ was removed on [DATE], as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility's undated Evacuation Instruction sheet showed: -During a general evacuation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the potential spread of COVID-19 (an acute respiratory illness in humans caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2) and other infections when staff failed to protect residents in the facility by not following acceptable infection control practices for COVID-19. The facility failed to separate six sampled residents (Resident #604, #605, #606, #607, #608 and #88) who tested positive for COVID-19 from six sampled residents (Resident #609, #610, #611, #612, #613 and #504), who had tested negative for COVID-19. One sampled resident (Resident #609) turned COVID-19 positive on 8/22/23 after sharing a room with a COVID-19 positive resident (Resident #604) who was diagnosed with COVID-19 on 8/18/23, out of sample of 37 sampled residents. The facility census was 110 residents. The Administrator was notified on 8/24/23 at 10:15 A.M., of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 8/18/23. The IJ was removed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision for one sampled resident (Resident #614) who was identified at risk on the facility's elopement risk assessment and was actively exit-seeking prior to the elopement . On 8/17/23 the resident broke out a facility window and walked to a busy street. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A saw the resident on the street, returned to the facility without the resident and reported where he/she last saw the resident. The Administrator was notified and the resident was found three blocks away from the facility out of 37 sampled residents. The census was 110 residents. On 8/24/23 at 10:15 A.M., the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance immediate jeopardy (IJ) which occurred on 8/17/23. On 8/17/23 the facility administration was notified of the incident and the investigation was started. No employees were allowed to work prior to reeducation. The IJ was corrected on 8/19/23. Review of the facility's undated Wandering and Elopement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect two sampled residents (Resident #5 and Resident #6) from physical abuse. On 3/14/26 at approximately 1:30 A.M. Resident #6 hit Resident #5 an unknown number of times. Resident #5 then threw his/her walker at Resident #6, which caused Resident #6 to fall to the ground. Resident #5 was transported to the hospital and treated for a chest bruise, abrasions, pain and Resident #6 had pain in his/her right hip out of 11 sampled residents. The facility census was 99 residents.On 3/23/26, the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of past non-compliance which occurred on 3/18/26. All staff received education prior to working their next shift. The deficiency was corrected on 3/18/26. Review of the facility Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy revised 1/21/26, showed:-It was the policy of the facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #1) out of five sampled residents, was free from physical abuse. On [DATE], Resident #2 struck Resident #1 multiple times on the top of his/her head with a solid wood and metal cane, which resulted in Resident #1 sustaining a laceration to the left temple with four stitches, bruising to his/her left eye socket, defensive bruising on his/her left pinky, ring finger, and a laceration to his/her second knuckle to his/her right middle finger. Resident #1 was sent to the hospital for treatment and stated he/she was afraid of Resident #2. The facility census was 112 residents. The Administrator was notified on [DATE] at 9:31 A.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on [DATE]. The IJ was removed on [DATE] as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility Resident Rights Policy, dated February 2023, showed: -The resident has the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-23 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light system operated as designed, failed to ensure call lights were within reach, and failed to ensure call lights were answered timely for six sampled residents (Resident #4, #10, #2, #8, #9, and #11) to maintain their activities of daily living (ADL) out of 11 sampled residents. The facility census was 99 residents. Review of the facility Call Lights; Accessibility and Timely Response Policy revised 1/1/26, showed:-It was the purpose of the policy to assure the facility was adequately equipped with a call light at each resident's bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance. -Call lights would directly relay to a staff member or centralized location to ensure appropriate response.-Staff would ensure the call light was within reach of resident's and secured, as needed.-The calling system would be accessible to residents while in their bed or other sleeping accommodations within the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer oxygen as ordered and to assess and monitor the oxygen saturation levels and respiratory status for one sampled resident (Resident #2) out of 11 sampled residents. The facility census was 99 residents. Review of the facility's Resident Rights Policy revised 1/1/26, showed:-The residents had the right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her treatment, including the right to receive the services and or items included in the plan of care.-The residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with the reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences, except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents.-The residents had the right to, and the facility must promote and facilitate residents' self-determination.-The residents had the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that were significant to the resident.-The residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the guardian in a timely manner when one resident (Resident #1) overdosed on fentanyl, received two doses of Narcan and was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. Six residents were selected for sample. The facility census was 101 residents. The Administrator was notified on 02/03/26 of the Past Non-Compliance which occurred on 02/01/26. The Director of Nursing (DON) educated floor staff on proper notification, location of emergency numbers, what information to leave on a voicemail, and to notify management when a guardian is contacted. The Social Services Director (SSD) was dedicated for follow up, auditing current contact information, and ongoing confirmation of emergency numbers at each care plan meeting and all admissions. Emergency numbers were moved to the special instructions in the electronic medical record for each resident. The deficiency was corrected on 02/06/26. Review of the facility Notification Policy, dated 2024, showed: -The purpose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure recommendations provided by the pest control technician were implemented and aggressive measures were taken to prevent or minimize the rodent infestation, potentially affecting any resident at the facility. Nine sampled resident rooms (Rooms 113, 123, 124, 129, 202, 204, 207, 214, and 230), occupied by 14 residents, out of 11 sampled resident rooms, had evidence of rodent activity. The facility census was 93 residents.Review of the facility Pest Control policy, revised May 2008, showed:-The facility shall maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the building is kept free of insects and rodents.-Garbage and trash aren't permitted to accumulate and are removed from the facility daily.-Maintenance Services shall assist, when appropriate and necessary, in providing pest control services. 1.Review of the facility's pest control invoices for August 2025 showed services were performed on 8/12/25, 8/20/25 and 8/28/25 with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transcribe physician orders correctly for an opioid pain medication (controlled pain medication for moderate to severe pain) and failed to clarify the physician orders when the medication was not received by the pharmacy for one sampled resident (Resident #500) of out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census of 107 Residents. 1. Review of Resident #500's Face Sheet showed he/she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of frost bite with necrosis (death of body tissue) to his/her left foot and non-pressure chronic wound (caused by prolonged pressure, arise from other factors like poor circulation, trauma, or infection) to his/her left foot. Review of the resident's hospital discharge instruction and summary dated 3/1/25 at 1:50 P.M. showed: -Had diagnosis to include frost bite to his/her left foot. -Oxycodone (opioid-control substance pain reliever) 5 milligram (mg), give one tab by mouth every six hours as needed for severe pain (for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on documentation, interview and policy review, the facility reported to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) through mandatory submission of staffing information in the Payroll- Based Journal (PBJ)excessively low weekend staff. This deficient practice had the potential to allow 112 residents not to receive the care and services required. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care. The facility's census, acuity and diagnoses of the resident population will be considered based on the facility assessment. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The facility will supply services by sufficient numbers of each of the following personnel types on a 24-hour basis to provide nursing care to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure eight hours per day of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage. Specifically, the facility reported to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) through mandatory submission of staffing information in the Payroll- Based Journal (PBJ), the lack of RN coverage for three out of four quarters (first, second and fourth quarter of 2024). This deficient practice had the potential to allow 112 residents not to receive the care and services required. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care. The facility's census, acuity and diagnoses of the resident population will be considered based on the facility assessment. Policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-21 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, document review and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) or other qualified professional was employed by the facility to manage the dietary department when a Registered Dietitian was not employed full-time. Failure to meet this requirement placed all 112 residents receiving foods served by the facility at risk for dissatisfaction with meals, malnutrition and/or a food-borne illness. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 02/19/25 at 10:00 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) was asked if they had completed a certification course for dietary managers, he/she stated, No. When asked if he/she had completed any formal training in food and or nutrition services, the DM stated, No and explained he/she had assumed the role after working as a cook in the facility for the past two years. 2. The facility failed to assure food was palatable and served at appetizing temperatures for residents reviewed for food concerns. Additionally, review of the Review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes revealed complaints related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code and policy review, the facility failed to ensure foods were stored, prepared, and distributed under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to 112 of 112 residents who ate food from the kitchen and placed these residents at risk for a food borne illness. Findings include: Review of the 2022 Food Code, published by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code and accessible at https://www.fda.gov, revealed, . Handwashing sink shall be equipped to provide water at a temperature of at least . (85 degrees F [Fahrenheit]) through a mixing valve or combination faucet . Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Preparation and Service, revised 04/2019, revealed, . Food and nutrition services [sic] employees prepare and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices . Appropriate measures are used to prevent cross contamination. These include . cleaning and sanitizing work surfaces . and food-contact equipment between uses, following food code guidelines . Food preparation staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure refuse and garbage was disposed of properly when the lid to the dumpster was not kept closed. This had the potential to increase the risk of rodents and other pests which could affect all 112 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: During observations of the dumpsters located behind the kitchen on 02/17/25 at 10:00 AM, 02/18/25 at 10:45 AM, 02/20/25 at 11:45 AM and 2/21/25 at 9:30 AM, the dumpster lid was observed open. During an interview on 02/17/25 at 10:00AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) reported that all the departments in the facility discarded garbage in the area and should close the lid when they finished adding trash to the dumpster.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 79 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-21 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan was developed containing the process the facility will follow to guide the care and services provided to residents and measure improvement. This deficient practice had the potential to not capture the efforts made in measuring the care and services for 112 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program- Governance and Leadership revised March 2020 revealed, Policy Statement The quality assurance and performance improvement program are overseen and implemented by the QAPI committee, which reports its findings, actions and results to the administrator and governing body. During an entrance conference with the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) on 02/17/25 at 9:31 AM and at 4:45PM, a request was made to get the QAPI plan for review. On 02/18/25 at 2:48 PM and 02/20/25 at 11:00AM, a request was made to the Administrator for the QAPI plan. On 02/20/25 at 09:44 AM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the grievances voiced repeatedly by the resident council were addressed and resolution presented to the council regarding food palatability, staff to resident interactions, pest control, and call light response. These failures had the potential to create feelings of dissatisfaction and helplessness among the eight residents who participated in Resident Council (R96, R2, R48, R88, R87, R109, R106, and R17) out of a census of 112 residents. Findings include: 1. During the group meeting interview on 02/19/25 at 10:00 AM, there was seven participants, R96, R48, R88, R87, R109, R106, and R17. a. Review of R48's Medical Diagnosis tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he/she was admitted on [DATE]. Review of R48's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/10/24 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical or verbal abuse by another resident for four residents (Resident (R) 52, R26, R31, and R24) of six residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: 1. Review of the Medical Diagnosis tab of R52's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophrenia, major depression, and anxiety. Review of R52's significant change of status Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 01/15/25 and located in the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R52 was cognitively intact. He did not exhibit mood or behavioral symptoms. Review of R52's Behavior note dated 06/25/24 and located under the Progress Notes tab of the EMR, revealed, [Social Service Director] was notified of altercation between a resident and his/her roommate, both resident and roommate was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act and reporting of all alleged violations to the state survey agency (SSA) for four residents (Resident (R) 52, R26, R31, and R24) of six residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: 1. Review of the Medical Diagnosis tab of R52's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he/she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophrenia, major depression, and anxiety. Review of R52's significant change of status Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 01/15/25 and located in the MDS tab of the EMR with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R52 was cognitively intact. Review of R52's Behavior note, dated 06/25/24 and located under the Progress Notes tab of the EMR, revealed, [Social Service Director ] was notified of altercation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of resident-to-resident abuse were investigated for four residents (Resident (R) 52, R26, R31, and R24) of six residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: 1. Review of the Medical Diagnosis tab of R52's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophrenia, major depression, and anxiety. Review of R52's significant change of status Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 01/15/25 and located in the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R52's cognition was intact. Review of the Medical Diagnoses tab of the EMR revealed R26 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of vascular dementia. Review of R26's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 01/22/25 and located under the MDS tab in the EMR, revealed the BIMS score of 10 out of 15 which indicated R26 had moderately impaired cognition.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the electronic medication administration record (MAR) matched the Controlled Drug Administration Record Tablet for three residents (Resident (R)65, R97, and R86) out of a total sample of 27 residents. The deficient practice increased the risk of staff administering narcotic medication that had already been administered to residents which increased the risk of adverse effects. Findings include: 1. Review of R65's admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis of chronic pain syndrome. During an interview on 02/17/25 at 10:18 AM, R65 stated that his/her narcotic medications ran out consistently included: oxycodone (a narcotic pain medication) and buprenorphine (a narcotic pain medication). Review of R65's Clinical Physician Orders located under the Orders tab of the EMR revealed an order dated 11/22/24 for Oxycodone 10 milligrams…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to properly label insulin pens with resident name and opened date and discard expired insulin pens, keep food, personal items and makeup separate from medications for two of six medication carts. The deficient practice could result in altered effectiveness of the medication, worsening of resident's symptoms, Findings include: 1. Observation on 02/19/25 at 1:27 PM of the nurse's medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)3 on the 100 (East) hall revealed: There were two Humalog insulin pens not labeled with the resident's name. There were five Lantus insulin pens open and not dated. There was one Levemir insulin pen that had an open date of 12/08/24. There was one Lantus vial that had an open date of 12/10/24. LPN3 at the time of the observation the insulin was expired and is to be discarded within 28 days after the date opened. A container of applesauce was found stored in the drawer with nebulizer medications. There was lipstick and makeup found in the top drawer without a name. LPN3 stated at the time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, document review and record review, the facility failed to assure food was palatable and served at appetizing temperatures for 10 of 10 residents (R2, R22, R101, R63, R70, R40, R31, R65, R97 and R94) reviewed for food concerns out of a sample of 27. Additionally, review of Review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes revealed complaints related to food palatability from five of five months of minutes reviewed. Failure to serve palatable and appetizing foods placed all residents residing in the facility at risk for weight loss. Findings include: 1. During meal service on 02/20/25, the [NAME] was observed testing temperatures of the foods on the tray line prior to starting tray service. A check of the log showed temperatures were recorded between 170 and 190 Degrees Fahrenheit (F). A test tray was requested from dietary and on 02/20/25 at 1:28 PM. The last tray cart left the kitchen for east hall residents who ate in their room and included the test tray. After the last trays were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to inform the 29 residents, R315, R77, R97, R104, R316, R72, R105, R61, R107, R68, R63, R24, R13, R108, R7, R106, R314, R67, R62, R110, R22, R73, R109, R115, R119, R116, and R117, and/or their representatives who signed the binding arbitration agreement out of a census of 112 in writing they were not required to enter into a binding arbitration agreement as a condition of admission. This failure placed these 29 residents at risk of signing the agreement involuntarily. Findings include: Review of the facility's Arbitration Agreement Rider to the admission Contract, provided by the Administrator revealed, The parties agree that any and all disputes arising out of or in any way related to the contract or the Resident's stay at the facility . shall be decided by arbitration in accordance with this Rider. The arbitration proceeding and settlement shall remain confidential . The resident also understands that nothing in this Rider prevents him/her from communicating with federal, state, or local officials . The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0848 — pattern
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to inform the 29 residents and/or their representatives (Resident (R)315, R77, R97, R104, R316, R72, R105, R61, R107, R68, R63, R24, R13, R108, R7, R106, R314, R67, R62, R110, R22, R73, R109, R115, R119, R116, and R117) who signed the binding arbitration agreement out of a census of 112 in writing of the right to selection of neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties. This failure placed these 29 residents at risk of misunderstanding the process for selection of an arbitrator. Findings include: Review of a copy of the facility's Arbitration Agreement Rider to the admission Contract, provided to the survey team by the Administrator, revealed, The parties agree that any and all disputes arising out of or in any way related to the contract or the Resident's stay at the facility . shall be decided by arbitration in accordance with this Rider. The arbitration proceeding and settlement shall remain confidential . The resident also understands that nothing in this Rider prevents him/her from communicating with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure five of five residents (Resident (R) 85, R70, R107, R34, and R95) residents reviewed for immunizations out of a total sample of 27 were assessed for eligibility, educated on the risks and benefits, and offered pneumococcal vaccination. This failure placed all eligible residents who wished to receive the vaccine at risk for contracting pneumonia unnecessarily. Findings include: In an interview on 02/21/25 at 5:21 PM, the Infection Preventionist (IP) stated he/she had just taken over the position about a month ago, and the former Assistant Director of Nursing who no longer worked at the facility had been in charge of the infection prevention and immunization program prior. He/She stated immunizations were documented either on paper in binders he/she kept or in the electronic medical record (EMR). The IP stated he/she was working on getting immunizations caught up, and stated he/she was able to administer influenza and COVID-19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and comfortable environment for six rooms (Resident (R) 70, R56, R94, and R65, room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]) of 32 rooms observed in Initial Pool. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 02/21/25 at 7:08 PM, the Regional Maintenance Consultant (RMC) stated he/she had just been hired to start implementing the necessary corrective measures to ensure a safe, clean, and comfortable environment. The RMC stated he/she did notice issues with walls in disrepair, broken heating vents or light fixtures, and other maintenance issues. The RMC stated the Maintenance Director had been at the facility for about a year and a half and he/she did not know why the issues had not yet been addressed and stated the Maintenance Director needed training on time management and prioritization. The RMC stated the facility had just recently implemented a reporting program through their electronic medical records (EMR) system in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement pest control measures to prevent mouse infestation in the facility, which affected four of 27 sampled residents (Resident (R) 76, R2, R22, and R73) and the common areas of the facility. This failure had the potential to cause an increase in rodent activity, creating a potential for spread of infection and dissatisfaction with living arrangements among the residents. Findings include: Review of March 2024 to December 2024 weekly pest control Service Inspection Reports, provided by the facility, revealed ongoing treatment for mice. The reports repeatedly documented the same recommendations for preventing the mice from entering the building. These recommendations included: -Fixing holes in the walls near several heat registers, -Fixing holes by baseboards throughout the facility, -Ensuring kitchen doors were rodent-proofed by eliminating gaps, -Ensuring gap under the front door was eliminated, and -Removing trash…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were allowed to exercise their rights to make choices important to them, the right to privacy, and the rights to have care provided in manner that supported each resident's autonomy. The affected three residents (Resident (R) 31, R22 and R19) in the sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Dignity, revised February 2021, revealed, . Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings, of self-worth and self-esteem . 1. Review of R19's admission Record, provided by the facility, revealed an admission date of 03/09/23 with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus, major depressions, and history of transient ischemia attacks. Review of R19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/23/24 located in the electronic medical record (EMR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided the correct form or provided the form that included the potential additional costs that the resident might have to pay if they chose to continue to receive services, Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice, form CMS-10055, for Medicare Part A Services when they were no longer covered or coverage was ending for three of three residents reviewed (Resident (R) 61, R110, and R114). This deficient practice had the potential to allow residents not to be provided the information about what services may not be covered by Medicare for residents to make an informed decision about receiving therapies. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Advance Beneficiary Notices revised [DATE] revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide timely notices regarding Medicare eligibility and coverage. 5. The current CMS-approved version of the forms shall be used at the time of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected weight and significant weight loss for one (Resident (R) 52) of 12 residents reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed R52 at risk of additional unplanned weight loss or malnutrition. Findings include: Review of R52's Medical Diagnosis tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he/she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: acute kidney failure, chronic kidney disease-stage four with dependence on renal dialysis, hyperkalemia (high potassium), hypomagnesemia (low magnesium), type 1 diabetes mellitus, anemia, and hypertension. Review of R52's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/28/24 indicated his/her weight was 195 pounds (lbs) and he/she had not experienced any significant weight loss or gain. Review of R52's weights found on the Weights and Vitals tab of the EMR revealed on 09/04/24, the resident weighed 193 lbs and on 10/01/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level I screening for mental disorder was completed for one (Resident (R) 36) of 27 residents in the sample. This failure had the potential for R36 to reside in the facility without a determination by the State mental health authority as appropriate for admission. Findings include: Review of R36's Medical Diagnosis tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he/she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and alcohol abuse and other psychoactive substance abuse with intoxication. He/She did not have a diagnosis of dementia. Review of the Orders tab of the EMR revealed R36 had physician orders which originated on 08/26/24, for olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication), 5 milligrams (mg) at bedtime and 2.5 mg during the day for schizoaffective disorder. Review of R36's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement interventions for safety for two (Resident (R) 2 and R32) of two residents reviewed for substance use disorders. Findings include: 1. Review of R2's Medical Diagnosis tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety, nicotine dependence, post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol abuse, and bipolar disorder. Review of R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/21/24 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated R2 was cognitively intact. Review of R2's Behavior note dated 10/16/24 and located in the Progress Notes tab of the EMR revealed, Resident tested positive for fentanyl [potent pain medication] during drug screen on 2 attempts this date. Review of R2's Behavior note dated 10/17/24 and located in the Progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure three of three portable compressed oxygen cylinders were safely stored in a secure device. The deficient practice had the potential for severe physical harm if the pressurized cylinder was to be knocked over and explode. In addition, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was kept in a clean and sanitary manner for one of three residents (Resident (R) R58) reviewed for oxygen usage in the sample of 27. Failure to provide clean oxygen tubing and oxygen filter increased the risk for respiratory problems related to contaminated equipment. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Safety, revised May 2011 indicated, Store oxygen cylinders in racks with chains, sturdy portable carts, or approved stands. Never leave oxygen cylinders free-standing. Review of the undated facility policy titled Oxygen Safety revealed, Policy: It is policy of this facility to provide a safe environment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were reviewed and signed by the physician for two of five sampled residents (Resident (R)19 and R60). This deficient practice had the potential to allow residents to continue to receive medications with irregularities that the physician has not furnished a rational. Findings include: 1. Review of R19's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed admission Record which indicated the admission date of 03/09/23 with diagnoses major depressions and anxiety. Review of R19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/23/24 showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognitive ability. Review of R19's Physician Orders located in the EMR under the Orders tab revealed an order dated 07/08/23 for clonazepam oral tablet 1 milligram (mg) by mouth three times a day for anxiety; order dated 06/25/24 for sertraline tablet 25mg give one tablet by mouth one time a day for depression; and order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of one resident (R)50) in the sample of 27 revealed the resident's preference for a sandwich to be add to the lunch and dinner meals was not being honored. The failure to ensure that a resident's food preferences were honored could result in the resident loosing weight. Findings include: 1. Review of R50's Medical Diagnosis tab of the EMR revealed he/she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease, heart disease, and amputation of toes. Review of R50's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 02/05/25 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed the BIMS score of 15 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. During an interview on 02/17/25 at 10:08 AM, R50 stated he/she was supposed to receive a sandwich with his/her meals, but he/she never received one. He/She explained his/her meal tickets documented he/she was to receive a sandwich with every meal because he/she did not feel like he/she got…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to implement infection prevention strategies to prevent cross-contamination during the medication pass for three of five residents (Resident (R) 94, R316, and R18) observed during the medication pass out of a total sample of 27. This failure had the potential to spread infectious diseases to all residents. The facility census was 112 residents. Findings include: Observation on 2/19/25 at 9:13 AM. CMT6 did not sanitize the blood pressure cuff prior to taking R94's blood pressure. Observation on 02/19/25 at 9:30 AM, CMT6 did not sanitize the blood pressure cuff prior to taking R316's blood pressure. Observation on 02/19/25 at 9:41 AM, CMT6 did not sanitize the blood pressure cuff prior to taking R18's blood pressure. During an observation on 02/19/25 at 9:13 AM to 10:05 AM, during medication administration, CMT6 failed to perform handwashing or hand hygiene prior to preparing medications for administration to R18. During an interview on 02/19/25 at 2:27 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 stated blood pressure cuffs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident (R) 32) of one resident review for antibiotic use in the sample of 27 had a duration of antibiotic therapy specified and antibiotic use did not continue without medical necessity. This failure placed R32 at risk of antibiotic resistance or unnecessary adverse effects of the medication. Findings include: Review of R32's Medical Diagnosis tab of the EMR revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of R32's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 01/10/25 and located in the MDS tab of the EMR revealed he received antibiotics. Review of R32's EMR under the Orders tab revealed a physician's order dated 01/10/24 to give one drop of Ofloxacin Ophthalmic Solution 0.3 % (antibiotic eye drops) in the left eye four times a day for cataract surgery. The order did not include a stop date. Review of R32's Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written discharge notice to one sampled resident (Resident #2) and/or his/her guardian upon emergency discharge from the facility out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 101 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Transfer or Discharge Notice dated March 2021 showed residents and/or representatives were notified in writing, and in a language and format they understood, at least 30 days prior to a transfer or discharge. 1. Review of Resident #2's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 10/9/24 showed the resident was discharged on 10/9/24 and the resident's discharge was unplanned. Review of a nurse's note dated 10/9/24 at 3:14 P.M. showed the resident had called Emergency Medical Services (EMS) on himself/herself and was transported to a local hospital. Review of a nurse's note dated 10/9/24 at 6:30 P.M. showed: -The Director of Nursing (DON) had given verbal emergency discharge notice to Guardian A.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-30 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit one sampled resident (Resident #2) for re-admission to the facility out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 101 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Bed-Hold and Returns dated March 2022 showed: -A resident would be permitted to return to an available bed in the location of the facility that he or she previously resided in. -If there was not an available bed in that part, the resident would be given the option to take the available bed in another distinct part of the facility and return to the previous distinct part when a bed were to become available. 1. Review of Resident #2's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 10/9/24 showed the resident was discharged on 10/9/24 and his/her return was not anticipated. Review of a nurse's note dated 10/9/24 at 3:14 P.M. showed the resident had called Emergency Medical Services (EMS) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the physical abuse of three sampled residents (Resident #4, #5 and #6). On 11/2/24 Family Member A entered the facility visibly and verbally upset stating to call 911 as he/she had been robbed. Receptionist A let Family Member A into the building. Family Member A began down the hall. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A followed Family Member A to ask why 911 should be called. Before CNA A could get an answer, Family Member A entered Resident #1 and Resident #2's room. Family Member A then went to Resident #1's side of the room struck Resident #3 and Resident #1 in the face and mouth area. Then Family Member A went to the bedside of Resident #2 where the resident was sleeping and struck Resident #2 in the face. Family Member A struck all three residents in the face or mouth area causing all three of them to have minor lacerations and bruising documented in their chart where first aid was provided out of seven sampled residents. The facility census was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to take corrective action which included physician notification, staff education, staff training and or staff in-services after physical abuse of three sampled residents (Resident #4, #5 and #6) out of seven sampled residents. The facility census was 105 residents. Review of the facility Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation Prevention Program Policy dated 4/2024 showed: -Protect residents from abuse by anyone including visitors. -Provide orientation and training programs that include topics such as abuse prevention, identification and reporting abuse. -Establish and implement a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI review and analysis of reports, allegations or findings of abuse). Review of the facility Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigation Policy dated 4/2024 showed: -The individual conducting the investigation as a minimum includes: --Interviews with the resident's attending physician as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the guardian, emergency contact and/or physician for one sampled resident (Resident #7) when on 10/30/24 the resident did not return to facility out of seven sampled residents. The facility census was 105 residents. Review of the facility Wandering and Elopement Policy dated 3/2019 showed: -If a resident is missing, initiate the elopement/missing resident emergency procedure. -Determine if the resident is out on an authorized leave or pass. -If the resident was not authorized to leave, initiate a search of the building and premises. -If the resident is not located, notify the administrator and the director of nursing services, the resident's legal representative, the attending physician, law enforcement officials, and (as necessary) volunteer agencies. Review of the facility Leave of Absence Policy dated 4/1/22 showed: -Leave of Absence (LOA) defined as leaving the facility with the appropriate authorization and notification. -A resident who is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the call light system which resulted in one sampled resident's (Resident #2) call light not being answered for approximately 20 minutes out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 105 residents. Review of the facility Supporting Activities of Daily Living policy dated 3/2018 showed: -Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). -Residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Review of the facility Answering the Call Light policy dated 3/2021 showed: -The purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and needs. -When answering from the call light station, turn off the signal light. -Identify yourself and politely respond to the resident by his/her name,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident's (Resident #3) dignity was maintained when on 9/30/24 Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) B pulled the resident's pants down exposing his/her buttocks to other bystanders out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 105 residents. Review of the facility's Dignity policy dated 2/2021 showed: -Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. -Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times. -The facility culture support dignity and respect for residents by honoring resident goals, choices, preferences, values and beliefs. -This begins with the initial admission and continues throughout the resident's facility stay. -Staff promote, maintain and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures. -Demeaning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate weight management for two sampled residents (Resident #8 and Resident #10), who had Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tubes (a tube that is passed into a person through the abdominal wall, commonly used to provide a means of feeding when oral intake is not adequate), with weight discrepancies out of 10 sampled residents. The facility census was 101 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention dated March 2022 showed: -Residents are weighed upon admission and at intervals established by the interdisciplinary team. -Any weight change of five percent or more since the last weight assessment is retaken the next day for confirmation. -If the weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the dietician in writing. -Unless notified of significant weight change, the dietician will review the unit weight record monthly to follow individual weight trends over time. 1. Review of Resident #8's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician's orders to ensure the intake of tube feeding and fluids was completed, failed to ensure the flush bag was dated and labeled, and failed to ensure the tube feeding bag and flush bag were changed every 24 hours, for one sampled resident (Resident #10) with a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a tube that is passed into a person through the abdominal wall, commonly used to provide a means of feeding when oral intake is not adequate) out of 10 sampled residents. The facility census was 101 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Enteral (passing through the intestine) Feeding via Continuous Pump dated November 2018 showed: -In preparation staff would need to verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. -The person performing this procedure should record the following information: --The date and time the procedure was performed. --Verification of tube placement. --Amount and type of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light system was operable and within reach for one sampled resident (Resident #1), who was bedbound and needed total assistance from staff for care, out of 10 sampled residents. The facility census was 101 residents. Review of the facility's Call light policy and procedure dated March 2021, showed: -The purpose was to ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and needs. -Be sure the call light is plugged in and functioning at all times. -When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair, be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. -Some residents may not be able to use their call light. Be sure you check these residents frequently. 1. Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of quadriplegia (a form of paralysis that affects all four limbs, plus the torso), stroke (when blood flow to the brain is blocked or there is sudden bleeding in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep the kitchen walk-in refrigerator floor clean; to maintain sanitary utensils and food preparation equipment; to keep trash dumpster's closed; to change the deep fryer oil in a timely manner; failed to properly document food temperatures to ensure they were suitably cooked to lessen the chance of bacterial contamination; to maintain plastic cutting boards and utensils in good condition to avoid food safety hazards; failed to separate damaged foodstuff; to store food within acceptable temperature parameters; and to ensure the proper refrigeration of foodstuffs, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, or staff who ate food from the kitchen. The facility's census was 105 residents with a licensed capacity for 120 residents at the time of the survey. 1. Record review of an open dietary binder on the table outside the Dietary Manager office, showed Service Line Checklist forms for 4/10/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet all the requirements for a comprehensive, facility-specific infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of water-borne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease), including documented assessments for such an outbreak and a plan to deal with them, in accordance with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who resided, visited, used, or worked in the facility; the facility failed to follow their policy to complete testing to screen new employees and residents for tuberculosis (TB- a communicable disease that affects especially the lungs, that is characterized by fever, cough, difficulty in breathing, abnormal lung tissue and function) for ten out of ten sampled new employees and for five out of five residents (Residents #35,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be adequately equipped with a complete, functioning call light system throughout the facility to ensure the ability to meet the residents' needs in a timely manner. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. The facility census was 105 residents with a licensed capacity for 120 residents at the time of the survey. Record review of the facility's emergency preparedness plan in a binder entitled Emergency Operations Plan, obtained from the west nurse station and last revised on 1/7/22, on page #30 with the heading Power Outage, showed there was no policy or procedural plan for an alternate method (for example, bells, whistles, or flashlights) for residents to contact staff to have their needs met in the event of a power outage to the building. 1. Observations during the facility non-resident room inspections with the Administrator and Director of Maintenance (DOM) on 4/18/23 between 11:01…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-26 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR a federally mandated screening process for individuals with serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability/developmental disability related diagnosis) was completed and available for three sampled residents (Resident #79, #18, #64 ) out of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 105 residents. The facility s PASRR Policy was requested several times and one was not provided by time of exit. 1. Record review of resident #79's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 3/20/23, showed: -The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. -The resident scored a 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS an assessment tool that shows a score between 3 of 15 which shows the resident's mental status. This tool helps determine the resident's attention, orientation and ability to register and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were offered or provided as needed showers for three sampled residents (Resident #23, #304, and #204), and to return to a resident's room to assist them after turning out the call light for one sampled resident (Resident #23), out of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 105 residents. Record review of the facility's policy, Shower or Tub Bath, dated February 2018 showed: -Staff was to document the date and time the shower was performed. -Document the name and title of the individual who performed the shower. -Document all assessment data obtained during the shower. -Document how the resident tolerated the shower. -If the resident refused the shower, the reason why and the interventions taken. -Document the signature and title of the person recording the data. -Staff was to notify the supervisor if the resident refuses the shower. -Staff was to notify the physician of any skin areas that may nerd to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours per day seven days a week. The facility maintained a census of greater than 60 residents and this deficiency had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 105 residents. The facility policy for staffing of RN coverage for eight consecutive hours per days was requested and was not received by the end of the survey. 1. Record review of the worked staffing sheets on 4/24/23 at 11:31 A.M., showed there was no RN scheduled for eight consecutive hours for the weekend of Friday 4/14/23; Saturday 4/15/23; or Sunday 4/16/23. During an interview on 4/21/23 at 6:04 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E said: -He/she worked the night shift 6:00 P.M., to 6:00 A.M. -Sometimes there was an RN working the night shift. -There should be an RN working on the day shift. -The Director of Nursing (DON) was an RN and he/she worked day shift. During an interview on 4/21/23 at 6:46 A.M., LPN D said: -The DON was an RN and was in the facility during the weekdays. -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the narcotic count sheet was signed by both the on-coming and the off-going nurses to verify the correct count of narcotics. The facility census was 105 residents. Record review of the facility's Controlled Substance policy dated April 2019 showed: -The facility complies with all laws, regulations and other requirements related to the handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of controlled medications. -Controlled substances are reconciled upon receipt, administration, disposition, and at the end of each shift. -Controlled medications are counted at the end of each shift. -The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty determine the count together. -Any discrepancies in the controlled substance count are documented and reported to the Director of Nursing (DON) services immediately. 1. Record review on 4/21/23 at 6:47 A.M., of the facility's [NAME] Nurses Station Narcotic and Hypnotic Inventory Sheet in the green narcotic book for the time period of 4/9/23 through 4/21/23 showed the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain Drug Regimen Review (DRR) reports and failed to ensure the reports were acted upon for three sampled residents (Residents #12, #24 and #35) out of five residents sampled for medication review. The facility census was 105 residents. Record review of the facility's Medication and Prescribing - Clinical Protocol policy dated as revised April 2018 showed: -The staff and physician would periodically re-evaluate the conditions and symptoms for which each resident is receiving medications to determine if the medication and doses are still relevant and are not causing undesired complications. -There were no instructions regarding the completion of the DRR reports and acting upon them. 1. Record review of Resident #12's care plan dated as admission date 2/7/22 showed the resident: -Was at risk for abnormal bleeding due to taking blood thinning medication. -Had a diagnosis of diabetes (a deficiency or complete lack of insulin secretion in the pancreas…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication carts were locked when the nursing staff was not within sight of the cart; to ensure there were not loose pills in the medication cart drawers; and to ensure cleaning products were not in the same drawer as the residents' medications. The facility census was 105 residents. Record review of the facility's policy, Storage of Medications, dated November 2020 showed: -The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. -Drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in locked compartments. -Only persons authorized to prepare and administer medications were to have access to locked medications. -The nursing staff was responsible for maintaining medication storage in a clean, safe and sanitary manner. -Compartments (including but not limited to drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerator, carts, and boxes) containing drugs and biologicals were locked when not in use. -Unlocked medication carts were not left unattended. 1. Continuous observation on 4/17/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two sampled residents (Resident #35 and #58,) out of five residents sampled for vaccination review were offered the influenza (flu) vaccine and three sampled residents (Resident #35 #58, and #88) were offered a pneumococcal (pneumonia) vaccine. The facility census was 105 residents. Record review of the facility's flu vaccine policy dated March 2022 showed: -All residents who had no medical contraindications to the vaccine would be offered the flu vaccine annually. -The facility would provide pertinent information about the significant risks and benefits of vaccines to residents. -Between October 1st and March 31st each year, the flu vaccine would be offered to residents unless the vaccine was medically contraindicated or the resident was already immunized. -Any refusal of a vaccine by a resident would be charted in their medical record. Record review of the facility's pneumonia vaccine policy dated March 2022 showed: -Prior to or upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-26 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 12 hours of training/in-services to include behavior & dementia training, abuse prevention, resident rights, care of the cognitively impaired resident, and training areas of weakness as determined in the Nurse aides' performance reviews for five out of five Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA). This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 105 residents. The facility policy for staffing in-services and training was requested and was not received by the end of the survey. 1. Record review of the inservice/trainings dated April 2022 to April 2023 that were provided showed: -Abuse Policy presented by the Regional Social Services (RSS) dated 2/14/23 to all department heads, then the department heads in-serviced their department staff. -Handwashing on 4/20/23 did not show who presented the in-service. It showed as qualifications a Registered Nurse (RN). -Infection Control covering Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii (CRAB- bacteria found in environment, especially in soil and water can…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat the residents with dignity by not ensuring two sampled residents, (Resident #23 and #72) genitals were covered up during cares and their Foley catheter bags were in a dignity bag when the residents were outside of their rooms out of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 105 residents. Record review of the facility's policy, Dignity, dated February 2021 showed: -Residents were to be treated with dignity and respect at all times. -Staff was to promote, maintain, and protect residents privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures. 1. Record review of Resident #23's face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Acquired absence of other parts of urinary tract (surgical removal of part of the urinary system resulting in person having a urostomy tube - a tube that helps you pass urine when your bladder is not working correctly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-26 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC) ((Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) form CMS-10123) was provided to the resident or their representative for one sampled resident (Resident #82) and to ensure a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) (form (CMS)-10055) was provided to the resident or their representative for two sampled residents (Resident #82 and #21) out of three sampled residents who were discharged from Medicare part A (insurance that covers inpatient hospital care, skilled nursing facility, lab tests, surgery, home health care for individuals who are [AGE] years of age and above or disabled). The facility census was 105 residents. Record review of the undated Form Instructions for the NOMNC CMS-10123 form showed the NOMNC must be delivered at least two calendar days before Medicare coverage services end. Record review of the CMS memo (S&C-09-20), dated 1/9/09, showed: -The NOMNC, form…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-26 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide notification to the Ombudsman (a resident advocate who provides support and assistance with problems and/or complaints regarding the facility) of the 30-day discharge notices for two sampled residents (Resident #11 and #43) out of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 105 residents. Record review of the facility's policy on discharging the resident dated as revised December 2016 showed the policy did not address 30-day discharge notices or notifying the Ombudsman of 30-day discharge notices. Record review of the facility's undated 30-Day Notice policy showed the policy did not address notifying the Ombudsman of 30-day discharge notices. 1. Record review of Resident #11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 1/23/23 showed: -The resident was cognitively intact. -The resident ranged from being independent to requiring supervision with all activities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan (document that specified health care and support needs and outlines how the facility met resident requirements) that included needs, goals, outcomes and preferences for one sampled resident (Resident #26) for use of oxygen and one sampled resident (Resident #44) for bowel and bladder routine out of 21 sampled residents. This practice had the potential to effect all residents. The facility census was 105 residents. Record review of the facility's Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered Policy, dated, March 2022, showed: -A comprehensive, Person Centered care plan that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs was developed and implemented for each resident. -The interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, developed and implemented a comprehensive,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were written parameters for when the staff should notify the physician and what to do when a resident's blood sugar was too high or too low for two sampled residents, (Resident #35 and Resident #88) out of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 105 residents. Record review of the facility's policy, Nursing Care of the Older Adult with Diabetes Mellitus (diabetes - a complex disorder of carbohydrate, fat, and protein metabolism that is primarily a result of a deficiency or complete lack of insulin secretion in the pancreas or resistance to insulin), dated November 2020 showed: -Use a glucometer (a small device that measures how much sugar is in a person's blood sample) for capillary blood sampling to measure correct blood glucose levels. -The target range for healthy older adults was considered 90 - 130 milligrams (mg)/deciliter (dl) (fasting - a person who has not eaten overnight). -The provider would order the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-26 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have in place measures to effectively communicate with one sampled resident (Resident #88) whom English was not his/her primary language and did not provide activities for him/her in Spanish (his/her primary language) out of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 105 residents. Record review of the facility's policy, Translation and /or Interpretation of Facility Services dated November 2020 showed: -The facility's language access program would ensure that individuals with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) shall have meaningful access to information and services provided by the facility. -When encountering LEP individuals, staff members would conduct the initial language assessment (e.g., I speak Cards and notify the staff person in charge of the language access program. -Written translation of vital information was available in the following languages at this time: -Policy was blank. -Vital information included the following:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Urinalysis (a test of your urine to check for infection, kidney problems, or diabetes) after a physician ordered the test for one sampled resident (Resident #88) out of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 105 residents. Record review of the facility's policy, Principles of Laboratory Specimen Collection, dated 4/1/22 showed: -A specimen collection was performed as ordered by a physician. -Contact the Unit Supervisor for questions or concerns regarding specimen collection. -Document in the progress notes any abnormalities associated with the collection process. 1. Record review of Resident #88's face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood). -Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). Record review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing and the oxygen humidifier were stored in a sanitary condition; and to change out the oxygen tubing per physicians' order for two sampled residents (Resident #18 and #64) out of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 105 residents. Record review of the facility's policy, Oxygen Administration, dated 2022 showed: -Change the oxygen tubing and mask/cannula weekly and as needed if it becomes soiled or contaminated. -Change humidifier bottle when empty, every 72 hours, or per facility policy, or as recommended by the manufacturer. -Use only sterile water for humidification. -Change nebulizer tubing and delivery device every 72 hours or per facility policy and as needed if they become soiled or contaminated. -Keep delivery devices covered in plastic bag when not in use. 1. Record review of Resident #18's face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Chronic Obstructive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor for side effects of psychotropic (a type of psychiatric medication which was available on prescription to treat psychosis) medications for one sampled resident (Resident #26) out of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 105 residents. Record review of the facility's Medication Utilization and Prescribing - Clinical Protocol policy, dated April, 2018, showed: -The physician and staff will identify situations in which a resident took medications associated with potentially significant medication-related problems such as allergies, drug to drug interactions drug-food interactions and adverse drug reactions. -The physician and staff will identify significant factors that may affect medication effectiveness and medication -related problems. -The staff and physician will identify and address unexpected, unintended, undesirable or excessive responses to medication based on the severity of underlying conditions, the seriousness of any adverse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-26 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician ordered labs and/or maintain lab results for two sampled residents (Resident #12 and #35) out of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 105 residents. A policy regarding following physician's orders for labs was requested but not received. During an interview on 44/26/23 at 2:27 P.M., the Administrator said if a policy wasn't provided that was requested that they did not have it or it was in the computer and they did not find it. 1. Record review of Resident #12's care plan for the admission date of 2/7/22 showed the resident had a diagnosis of Convulsions (a hyperexcitation of neurons in the brain leading to a sudden, violent involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles). Record review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 2/25/23 showed the following staff assessment of the resident: -Had short and long-term memory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-01-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain competencies and skill sets of facility nursing staff for four out four sampled nurses. The facility census was 62 residents. 1. Record review of four Licensed Nurses employment files on 1/19/21 showed no competencies sign offs could not be produced for verification. During an interview on 1/19/21 at 11:24 A.M., the Social Services Assistant (SSA) said: -No competencies could be found for the nursing staff. -He/She started working for the facility in November 2020. -He/She had not provided any competencies or skills check offs since he/she started working for the facility. -He/She could not locate any nursing competencies or skills check offs prior to November 2020. -Training was poor prior to him/her working for the facility, and he/she had just started getting a training program developed. During an interview on 1/19/21 at 11:57 A.M., the Administrator said: -Nursing managers were responsible for ensuring competencies were done. -He/She would expect competencies or skills check offs for all staff.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-01-19 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA's) received the required 12 hours in-service education based on performance reviews annually for six CNAs out of six sampled. The facility census was 62 residents. 1. Record review on 1/19/21 of six CNAs employment file showed the required 12 hours in-service education hours competencies and/or skills sign offs could not be produced for verification. During an interview on 1/19/21 at 11:24 A.M., the Social Services Assistant (SSA) said: -The required 12 hours of CNA in-service education records could not be produced for verification. -He/She started in working for the facility in November 2020. -He/She could not find documentation of any CNA inservice education or skills check-offs prior to November 2020. -He/She had not provided any CNA inservice education or skills check offs since November 2020. -Training was poor prior to him/her coming to the facility, and he/she had just started getting a training program developed. During an interview on 1/19/21 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-01-19 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — widespread
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 12 hours of in-service training for the licensed nurses on dementia and behavioral health needs for four licensed nurses of four sampled. The facility census was 62 residents. 1. Record review of four Licensed Nurses employment file showed the required 12 hours of in-service training on dementia and behavioral health needs verification could not be produced. During an interview on 1/19/21 at 11:24 A.M., the Social Services Assistant (SSA) said: -He/She started working for the facility in November 2020. -He/She had not provided the required 12 hours in-service training on dementia and behavioral health needs for the nursing staff since he/she started working for the facility. -He/She could not locate any in-service training verification on dementia and behavioral health needs prior to November 2020. -Training was poor prior to him/her working for the facility, and he/she had just started getting a training program developed. During an interview on 1/19/21 at 11:57 A.M., the Administrator: -There should be the 12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-01-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the shift change narcotic count was completed and signed by both the on-coming and off-going nursing staff. The facility census was 62 residents. Record review of the facility's Inventory Control of Controlled Substances policy dated 11/28/12 and revised on 11/26/17 showed: -Staff were to always participate in the counting of the controlled substances at the beginning and ending of your shift. -Have partner to assist in the count. -Sign name, time and date of completed count. 1. Record review of the facility's Controlled Drug Count sheet dated 11/9/20 - 11/20/20 showed: -The document did not identify which hall the narcotic count sheet was for. -Five out of 26 opportunities were not signed by either the oncoming or off going staff. Record review of the facility's Controlled Drug Count sheet dated 11/21/20 - 12/3/20 showed: -The document did not identify which hall the narcotic count sheet was for. -Two out of 26 opportunities were not signed by either the oncoming or off going staff. Record review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-01-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Observation on 1/14/21 at 6:30 A.M., showed: -The Human Resource (HR) Director entered the facility through the double doors from the outside into the foyer. -He/She stood in line waiting to be screened for signs or symptoms of COVID. -There was a receptionist at the desk who was screening people. -There were new surgical masks on the receptionist's desk. -The HR Director stood in the foyer for more than ten minutes without a mask on. -There was one male resident sitting in a chair in the foyer looking out the doors. -The HR Director went into his/her office which was located directly behind the receptionist's desk without a mask on. Observation on 1/15/21 at 8:15 A.M., showed: -CMT A walking down the hall between the East and [NAME] Halls without his/her mask pulled up over his/her nose and mouth. -His/Her mask was down around his/her neck. -He/She was within three feet of a resident. -He/She talked to the resident for six minutes. -The resident was wearing a facemask correctly. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-01-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow facility policies and procedures for checking the employee disqualification listing (EDL) and completing the Nurse Aide Registry Check within a timely manner and in accordance with state requirements prior to employing eight of ten employees sampled for the EDL screening and five of ten employees sampled for the Nurse Aide Registry screening. The facility census was 62 residents. Record review of the facility's Abuse Prevention and Reporting revised on 12/10/18, showed regarding pre-employment screening of potential employees: -The facility will not knowingly employ any individual convicted of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property. -This facility will not knowingly hire any staff with a disciplinary action in effect against their license by a state licensing body that results from a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property. -All potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-01-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy Drug Regimen Reviews (DRR) were completed and in the resident's medical record monthly and failed to ensure the resident's physician responded to pharmacy recommendations and the response were documented in the resident's medical record for five sampled residents (Resident #42, #13, #41, #5, and #6) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 62 residents. Record review of the facility's policy titled Pharmacist Medication Review dated 11/28/17 showed: -The Consultant Pharmacist shall provide pharmaceutical care consultation including the medication regimen review at least once per calendar month for each resident residing in certified areas of skilled long term care facility. -The consultant Pharmacist will review the medication regimen of each resident in sufficient detail to determine if any apparent irregularities exist. Federally mandated standards of care as well as other applicable standards serve as the basis for review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-01-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure inhalers and medication vials were dated when opened; failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the medication delivery system; and failed to ensure medications carts are locked and not left unattended by staff when they were unlocked. The facility census was 62 residents. Record review of facilities Medication Storage policy dated 10/1/15 revised 7/2/19 showed: -Facility should ensure that all medications and biologicals, including treatment items, were securely stored in a locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room that was inaccessible by residents and visitors. -Once any medication or biological package was opened, the facility should follow manufacturer/supplier guidelines with respect to expiration dates for opened medications. Facility staff should record the date opened on the medication container when medication had a shortened expiration date once opened. -Facility should ensure that medications and biologicals that: (1) have an expired date on the label, (2) have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-01-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow pre-prepared menus to ensure they met the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines, and failed to have a basic ingredient in stock that is called for in many recipes. These deficient practices potentially affected all residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility's census was 62 residents with a licensed capacity for 120 residents. Record review of the undated Week at a Glance menus for weeks 1 through 4, provided by the DM, showed a variety of meals that met the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines. The lunch meal for week 2 that was supposed to be served was listed as chili mac with buttered peas and peaches with whipped topping. 1. Observations on 1/11/21 at 9:30 A.M. of the lunch meal preparation showed: -The Day [NAME] preparing potato and hamburger casserole, mixed vegetables, and bread. -No recipes were out and being followed during meal preparation. -It could not be determined if any ingredients were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-01-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary food serving utensils and preparation equipment; failed to ensure plastic cutting boards were in good condition to avoid food safety hazards; failed to separate damaged food stuffs; and failed to keep a ceiling vent and floor fan free of lint to prevent food contamination. These deficient practices potentially affected all residents who ate food from the kitchen. The skilled nursing facility census was 62 residents with a licensed capacity for 120. 1. Observations during the kitchen inspection on 1/11/21 between 8:51 A.M. and 1:15 P.M. showed the following: -A microwave had food splatters on the interior walls, top, and inside of door. -A toaster had an abundance of crumbs in the bottom. -A white cutting board was deeply scored to the point of plastic bits hanging off it. -A white handled spatula had dark brown streaks of an unknown substance dried and peeling off the metal blade. -On a can dispenser rack in the Dry Storage room there was a 6.61 pound (lb) can of mandarin oranges with a dent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-01-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow standard trash and garbage disposal practices to mitigate the presence of common household pests (for example, bed bugs, lice, roaches, ants, mosquitoes, flies/gnats, mice, and/or rats), and failed to maintain an effective pest control program with measures to eradicate those pests when present. The facility's census was 62 residents with a licensed capacity for 120 residents. 1. Observations during the dining room and kitchen inspections on 1/11/21 between 8:51 A.M. and 2:10 P.M. showed the following: -A roach was on the floor of the southeast dining room doorway to the Main Dining room and another one on the room's west wall. -Gnats were hovering about a full trash can in the southeast dining room by the Kitchen double doors and another one by the room's west wall outlet. -Two roaches were on the floor of the Main Dining room by a wall partition and another one was on top of the trash in the full white trash can by the single kitchen door. -In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-01-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's Foley catheter (a sterile tube placed in the bladder to drain urine) was in a dignity bag (a covering that can not be seen through that hides the urine of a Foley catheter) while the resident was in a public area and by not ensuring a resident was provided privacy during cares for one sampled resident, (Resident #37) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 62 residents. Record review of the facility's Dignity policy dated 11/28/12 with a revision date 4/23/18 showed: -The facility shall promote care for the residents in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of his or her individuality. -The facility shall consider the resident's life style and personal choices identified through the assessment process to obtain a picture or his or her individual needs and preferences. -The staff shall carry out activities in a manner which assists…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-01-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of a Resident to Resident altercation for one sampled resident (Resident #38) who was at risk for potential resident to resident abuse, and failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of misappropriation of resident property for one closed record resident (Resident #101) out of 19 sampled residents and seven closed record reviews. The facility census was 62 residents. Record review of the facility's undated Incident/Accident Reports Policy showed: -Policy: The Incident/Accident Report should be completed for all unexplained bruises or abrasions, all accidents or incidents where there was injury or the potential to result in injury, allegations of theft and abuse registered by residents, visitors, or others, and resident-to-resident altercations. -Procedure: --An 'incident' was defined as any happening, not consistent with the routine operation of the facility, that did not result in bodily or property damage. --An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-01-19 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a resident with a discharge notice with the right to appeal upon discharge from the facility, failed to ensure the resident was provided with a discharge plan, failed to allow the resident to return to the facility after his/her improper discharge, failed to notify the resident and family in writing the reason of the transfer to the hospital, and failed to notify the Ombudsman of the resident's discharge from the facility for one closed record resident (Resident #1) and one sampled resident (Resident#37) out of 19 sampled residents and seven closed records. The facility census was 62 residents. Record review of the facility's undated Discharge/Transfer of Resident policy showed: -The purpose was to provide safe departure from the facility and to provide for continuity of care and treatment. -Explain the discharge procedure to the resident and family. -An attending physician's order was required to discharge. -Inform all departments of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-01-19 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Bed Hold notification was provided to three sampled residents (Resident #42, #1, and # 37) or their responsible party for signature, upon discharge to the hospital out of 19 sampled residents and seven closed records. The facility census was 62 residents. Record review of the facility's Bed Hold Policy, revised on 9/16/17, showed the purpose was to ensure that the residents and/or resident representative are notified of the facility bed hold policy and conditions for return to facility upon admission and at the time of a transfer from the facility. The guideline showed the facility's bed hold policy applied to all residents. It showed: -The bed hold policy will be given to the resident and/or resident representative upon admission to the facility, at the time of transfer from the facility and if the bed hold policy under the state plan or the facility's policy were to change. -In cases of emergency transfer, notice at the time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-01-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure accurate documentation of the use of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP - a method of noninvasive ventilation assisted by a flow of air delivered at a constant pressure throughout the respiratory cycle); failed to obtain a physician's order for a continuous blood glucose monitor for one sampled resident (Resident #13); failed to accurately transcribe physician's orders to include the proper use or diagnosis for a blood pressure medication, for one sampled resident (Resident #7); and failed to ensure a resident had an appointment with a psychiatrist in a timely manner and failed to obtain a physician's order when sending a resident to the hospital for one sampled resident (Resident #37) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 62 residents. Record review of internet reference guide from Mircomedex Drug Reference for Lisinopril (a prescription medication used to treat high blood pressure and heart failure)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-01-19 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a written discharge summary and coordinate discharge planning with the resident's legal guardian for one closed record resident (Resident #107) out of 19 sampled residents, and seven closed record reviews. The facility census was 62 residents. Record review of the facility's undated Discharge/Transfer of Resident policy showed: -Purpose: to provide safe departure from the facility, and to provide for continuity of care and treatment. -Explain the discharge procedure to the resident and family. -Provide additional health education or medication instruction information for the resident or family as indicated in lay terminology. -Ongoing resident/family conferences should address health education and potential discharge planning needs. -Initiate measures for follow-up care as indicated (Social Services, Home Health Care, etc.). -Document discharge summary. Include notes on specific instructions given (medications, dressings, etc.) to resident and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-01-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review of Resident's #6 Facesheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with following diagnosis: -Acquired absence of left leg below the knee. -Peripheral vascular disease (PVD - inadequate flow of blood to the extremities). -Essential hypertension (HTN- high blood pressure). Record review of the facility's Skin Condition Assessment & Monitoring- Pressure and Non-Pressure, dated 11/28/12 and revised on 6/8/18, showed: -Pressure and other ulcers (diabetic, arterial, venous) will be assessed and measured at least weekly by licensed nurse and documented in the resident's clinical record. -Non-pressure skin conditions (bruises/contusions, abrasions, lacerations, rashes, skin tears, surgical wounds, etc.) will be assessed for healing progress and signs of complications or infection weekly. -A skin condition assessment and pressure ulcer risk assessment (Braden) will be completed at the time of admission/readmission. The pressure ulcer risk assessment will be updated quarterly and as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-01-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents not ensuring a resident did not have smoking materials in his/her room for one sampled resident (Residents #46), failed to thoroughly document falls and complete a comprehensive fall investigation (which described/documented the resident's fall, interventions that were in place prior to the fall, immediate response to the fall, post fall interventions, notification of the resident's physician and responsible party, and analysis of the possible cause of the resident's fall) for one sampled resident (Residents #59) and one closed record resident (Resident #103) out of 19 sampled residents, and seven closed record reviews. The facility census was 62 residents. Record review of the facility's Fall Prevention Program policy revised 11/21/17 showed: -A Fall Risk Assessment will be performed at least quarterly and with each significant change in mental or functional condition, and after any fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-01-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving dialysis (the process of removing blood from an artery (as of a kidney patient), purifying it by dialysis, adding vital substances, and returning it to a vein) had a valid physician's order indicating where and when the resident was to go for dialysis treatment and obtain orders directing staff to monitor the resident's dialysis central venous catheter (CVC - a flexible, long, plastic, Y-shaped tube that is threaded through your skin into a central vein in your neck, chest or groin - a connection between a vein and artery to provide access for dialysis treatment) for one sampled resident (Resident #34) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 62 residents. Record review of the Dialysis Monitoring and Observation policy dated 11/28/12 revised 2/13/18 showed: -If the resident had a catheter for dialysis, the nurse will assess the catheter site for any signs of drainage and condition of the dressing to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-01-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for one sampled resident (Resident #13) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 62 residents. Record review of the Pharmacist Medication Review policy dated 11/28/17 showed the Consultant Pharmacist shall provide pharmaceutical care consultation including the medication regimen review at least once per calendar month for each resident residing in certified areas of skilled long term care facility. -The consultant Pharmacist will review the medication regimen of each resident in sufficient detail to determine if any apparent irregularities exist. Federally mandated standards of care as well as other applicable standards serve as the basis for review to ensure that a resident's medications are promoting or maintaining the resident's highest level of function in congruence with the resident's therapeutic goals and to identify clinically significant risks and/or adverse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-01-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review of Resident #42's Face Sheet showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, pain, diabetes, dementia without behavioral disturbance, high blood pressure, anxiety disorder, obesity, vitamin deficiency, depression and other specified disorders of adult personality and behavior. Record review of the resident's MDS dated [DATE], showed: -The resident's BIMs was 15 out of 15 showing he/she had no cognitive incapacities. -The resident had no mood, behaviors or psychosis/delirium. -The resident needed extensive assistance with transfers and physical assistance with bathing needed, but no assistance noted with dressing grooming eating. -The resident was always incontinent. -The resident had no infections during the lookback period. -The resident was not taking any antibiotics during the lookback period. Record review of the resident's Nursing Notes showed: -9/14/20-at 8:15 A.M., the resident was outside on a smoking break and told other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-01-19 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to documentation and monitoring for ongoing hospice care (a type of health care that focuses on comfort care of a terminally ill resident) visit and communication with hospice staff and failed to obtain pertinent documentation of the the delivery of hospice care services for one sampled resident (Resident #27) out 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 62 residents. Review of the facility Hospice Services Policy and Procedure revision on 11/17/17 showed: -Hospice services staff will write a progress note for each resident visit indicating treatment provided and pertinent information related to the resident's condition which is available for all interdisciplinary staff to access. -Facility licensed personnel will be responsible to notify hospice service coordinator in event of change of resident condition and prior to transfer to another facility. -All treatment and services are documented in accordance with the facility's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-01-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment in one non-resident room adjacent to a hallway and the Main Dining area by allowing ceiling tiles and walls to become dampened to the point of having a visible black substance appearing to be mold growth on them. This deficient practice had the potential to affect numerous residents, visitors, and staff who passed through, used, or worked in the two areas nearby. The facility census was 62 residents with a licensed capacity for 120. 1. Observations during the facility Life Safety Code room inspections with the Interim Maintenance Director (IMD) on 1/12/21 at 2:41 P.M. showed the following in the Conference room across from the Main Dining room: -One discolored 2 foot (ft) by 4 ft ceiling tile with numerous black splotches on it was sagging down from the ceiling tile grid. -One discolored ceiling tile with black splotches on it was broken apart in a pile on the floor next to the east wall baseboard. -Large black streaks and stains were on the wall above the baseboard on both sides of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2025-02-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — widespread
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide the personalized dialysis contract for one of one resident (Resident (R)31) who received dialysis from the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who receive dialysis from this facility to receive agreed on services. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Business Associate Agreements revised February 2014 revealed, Policy Statement: Our facility may disclose protected health information (PHI) (including electronic protected health information [e-PHI]) to business associates or allow business associates to create or receive protected health information (PHI/e-PHI), upon the business associate's signing a written agreement to appropriately safeguard such protected information. Review of R31' electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission Record revealed an admission date of 10/15/24 with diagnosis of end stage dialysis. Review of R31's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 01/19/25, with a Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$121,672 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $107,910 — penalty dated 2026-02-17
  • $13,762 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-03-26 for 14 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
COR HEALTHCARE PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2022
GOLDBERG, NATHANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER33%since 04/01/2022
INSEL, DOVIDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER33%since 04/01/2022
NAVAS-MIGUELOA, LUISIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER33%since 04/01/2022
TRICE, CAROLIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 92%Medicare 4%Other / private 5%

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$241per resident / day
operating cost
$7,340per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$213per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265463. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next