University Health Lakewood Medical Center
7900 Lee's Summit Road, Kansas City, MO 64139 · Non profit - Corporation · 188 certified beds · (816) 404-7000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (25) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $14,901 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-30)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 29.8% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.4% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.7% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.2% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.7% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.3% | 17.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 30.7% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.0% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.3% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.4% | 17.8% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 25.6% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 8.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 8.8% | 26.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.9% | 13.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.24 | 2.11 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.84 | 2.33 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 188 beds and averages 129.9 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 58 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.32 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-04-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Residents #1 and #2) out of 10 sampled residents were free physical and mental abuse from Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A. On 4/17/25, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A grabbed Resident #1's arm, resulting in bruising and calling the resident a name. Additionally, CNA A refused to take the resident to the toilet and told the resident to be quiet. Later the same day, Resident #2 was heard asking CNA A to let the water warm up before being showered. CNA A said he/she didn't have time and placed the resident into the shower and sprayed him/her with cold water and then left him/her alone in the shower room partially naked for approximately five minutes while the resident was heard repeatedly yelling loudly for help and that he/she was cold while in the shower room and heard crying following the shower. The facility census was 134 residents. On 4/30/25 at 4:26 P.M., the Administrator was notified of the immediate jeopardy (IJ)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-20 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure six sampled residents (Residents #2, #5, #10, #11, #13, #14) out of 14 sampled residents were treated with dignity and respect and cared for in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life. The facility census was 130 residents. The Administrator and Director of Nurses (DON) was notified on 3/20/26 of Past Non-Compliance which occurred on 3/12/26. On 3/12/26 the facility administration suspended Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) A, begun an investigation, and notified appropriate parties. Facility staff and residents were interviewed. Facility staff in-services were started on abuse and neglect policy which included dignity for all employees. The deficiency was corrected on 3/13/26. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect dated 8/11/23 showed:-Residents had the right to maintain good mental and psychosocial well-being.-Facility staff were required to ensure the prevention of use of verbal or nonverbal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate storage and labeling of medications throughout the facility's medication carts and medication cabinets which had the potential to affect all residents within the facility. The facility census was 131 residents.Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Purchasing and Storage dated 1/10/24 showed:-Medications would be stored consistently with manufacturers' recommendations and in a manner that reduces the opportunity for a medication error to occur.-When medications were placed into active stock, expiration dates would be reviewed and stock rotated so products with the earliest expiration dates were dispensed first.1. Observation on 8/20/25 at 11:34 A.M. of the Three North (3N) Certified Medication Technician (CMT) medication cart showed:-37 Culturelle (a probiotic supplement to support digestive health) capsules that were outside of their original package and expiration dates could not be found on each packet.-18 Guaifenesin (a common expectorant drug that helps loosen and this mucus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain a comprehensive, facility-specific infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of Legionella (A [NAME] of pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria that includes the species L. pneumophila, causing legionellosis, all illnesses caused by Legionella, including a pneumonia-type illness called Legionnaires' disease and a mild flu-like illness called Pontiac fever) and/or other water-borne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease) that included specific assessments and contents, in accordance with State of Missouri rules and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) standards and guidelines. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who resided, visited, used, or worked in the facility. The facility failed to ensure appropriate hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #31) was invited to their care plan meeting out of 26 sampled residents. The facility census was 131 residents.A facility policy related to care plan invitations was requested and not received prior to exit.1. Review of Resident #31's admission record showed he/she admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of Hemiplegia (paralysis to one side of the body) and Hemiparesis (partial weakness affecting one side of the body) following Cerebral Infarction (ischemic stroke- occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow and restricted oxygen to the brain) affecting the left non-dominant side.Review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning) note dated 6/12/25 at 4:51 P.M. completed by MDS Coordinator B showed he/she had reached out to the resident's Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA- a legal document that gives a designated person the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered with an error rate of less than five percent (%). Two medication errors were detected out of 38 observed opportunities resulting in a medication rate of 5.26 %. One error involved administration of insulin (medication used to treat high blood sugars) with an insulin pen (an injection device that delivers preloaded insulin by dialing a desired dose) and one error involved the correct method for measuring the quantity of a liquid medication). In addition, the facility failed to have a policy that addressed insulin pens, including to follow manufacturers' instructions regarding how many units of insulin to use in priming differed insulin pens. The facility census was 131 residents.Review of the facility Insulin Injection Administration policy dated 11/11/23 showed:-Use of insulin pens (an insulin delivery system that generally looked like a large pen, used an insulin cartridge rather than a vial, and used disposable needles for injection of insulin) was not addressed in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely reporting of abuse allegations per the facility policy for two sampled residents (Resident #1 and #2) out of 10 sampled residents. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A was allowed to continue his/her shift on 4/17/25 and to work part of his/her shift on 4/18/25 potentially affecting all residents in his/her assignment. The facility census was 134 residents. On 4/30/25 the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which took place from mid-afternoon on 4/17/25 and 4/18/25. Corrective measures began immediately. The CNA was suspended. All staff were re-educated on abuse and neglect reporting. The deficiency was corrected on 4/18/25. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, revised 7/26/24, showed: -The facility will implement an abuse prohibition program to include training of employees, identification of possible incidents or allegations which need investigation, protection of residents during investigations, and reporting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure discharge/transfer documentation was completed to include reasons for the discharge/transfer, discharge plan and notification of the resident's responsible party, for one sampled resident (Resident #1), who was discharged to another facility, out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 147 residents. Review of the Facility's Transfer and Discharges/Notice of Proposed Discharge Policy revised on 6/27/24 showed: -Transfer and discharge will be handled appropriately to ensure proper notification and assistance to resident and families in accordance with federal and state specific regulations. -Procedure: --The transfer or discharge is necessary for the resident welfare and the resident needs cannot be met in their current placement in the facility. --When the health and safety of individuals in the facility is endangered due to clinical or behavioral status of the resident. -In an event that the resident requires transfer or discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an emergency discharge letter was provided to the resident's and/or the resident's representatives with Durable [NAME] of Attorney (DPOA) (a person who has the legal authority and responsibility to make decisions for another person) including the right to appeal the discharge and Ombudsman (a person who investigates, reports on, and helps settle complaints) contact information upon discharge for one sampled resident (Resident #1) out of 5 sampled residents. The facility census of 147 residents. Review of the Facility's Transfer and Discharges/Notice of Proposed Discharge Policy revised on 6/27/24 showed: -Transfer and discharge will be handled appropriately to ensure proper notification and assistance to resident and families in accordance with federal and state specific regulations. -Procedure: --The transfer or discharge is necessary for the resident welfare and the resident needs cannot be met in their current placement in the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed to prevent contamination and spread of infection for one sampled resident (Resident #4) who was on contact droplet isolation for Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV - a respiratory virus that infects the lungs and breathing passages and can be serious, especially for infants and older adults) out of two sampled residents who were on isolation on the third floor south unit. The sample was five residents. The facility census was 145 residents. Review of the facility's Isolation Precautions policy and procedure, dated 2/20/23, showed: -The facility will use contact precautions in addition to standard precautions based on the disease or infection transmission as outlined by the Department of Health and by the long term care federally regulatory agency to assist health care personnel in preventing and controlling the spread of organisms and communicable diseases. -Standard precautions include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0559 — patternHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents and/or the resident's responsible party's timely notifications (verbal and/or in writing) prior to a roommate change for three sampled residents (Residents #1, #2, and #3) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 149 residents. Review of the facility's Resident Right's policy dated 11/16 showed: -Notification of changes: --A facility must immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his/her authority, the resident representative(s) when there is a change in room or roommate assignment. Review of the facility's current Census List dated 2/27/24 showed Resident #1 and Resident #2 were currently roommates. 1. Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's Care Center Resident's Rights dated 11/9/16 showed: -The resident had the right to receive notice before the resident's room or roommate in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 14 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's discharge notification contained the correct contact information for appeal rights for one sampled resident (Resident #1) out of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 149 residents. On 2/27/24, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 10/31/23. The facility administration was notified during the resident's appeal process that the discharge notification contact information was incorrect. Inservices were provided to staff who were involved in preparing the discharge notification notices on 11/2/23. Discharge notices sampled after 11/2/23 contained the correct contact information for the appeal process. The deficiency was corrected on 11/2/23. Review of the facility policy Transfers and Discharges/Notice of Proposed discharge date d 3/5/19 showed: -Transfers and discharges will be handled appropriately to ensure proper notification and assistance to residents and families in accordance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure intravenous (IV) services were provided consistently with professional standards of practice by failing to obtain physician orders to monitor and maintain a peripheral intravenous catheter (a thin, flexible tube placed into a vein using a needle to allow for the administration medications, fluids and/or blood products)and to individualize a comprehensive care plan for IV therapy on one sampled resident (Resident #71) out of 32 sampled residents. The facility census was 163 residents. Review of the facility policy and procedure for Intravenous Therapy Peripheral in Long Term Care reviewed 8/2/23 showed: -Assess IV site for erythema (redness), warmth, edema (collection of fluid causing swelling), and drainage. Document per routine ongoing assessment and as needed. -Clean needleless injection cap with 70% alcohol before accessing system. Scrub the needleless injection cap and allow to dry. -Inject 2mls (milliliters) of normal saline,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for two sampled resident's (Resident #37 and #112) who received Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP- a machine that uses mild air pressure delivered by mask to keep breathing airways open during sleep )to ensure cleansing, sanitary storage and maintenance of the resident's CPAP nasal mask, machine and supplies, to assess and document the use of the resident's CPAP, ensure the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment completed by the facility for care planning) included CPAP use and care plans addressed the use of CPAP, out of 32 sampled residents. The facility census was 163 residents. A policy and procedure was requested from the facility and was not provided prior to exit. 1. Review of Resident #37's Face Sheet showed: -He/She was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. -He/She had a diagnosis of heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were physician orders for hemodialysis (process of cleansing the blood by passing it through a special machine - necessary when the kidneys are not able to filter the blood), for monitoring the resident's fistula (a surgically created connection between a vein and artery that allows access to the bloodstream for dialysis) and for monitoring the resident after dialysis for one sampled resident (Resident #43). Additionally the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding care and services for two sampled residents (Residents #43 and #121) out of 32 sampled residents. The facility census was 163 residents. Review of the facility's Dialysis for Patients on Long Term Care (LTC) policy/procedure, dated 2/8/17 and revised 12/14/22, showed the LTC Medical Director will coordinate with the Nephrologist (a medical doctor specializing in treating diseases of the kidney) for all dialysis needs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications (medications which affect psychic function, behavior, or experience) were administered for targeted behaviors, to monitor and document the targeted behaviors, and monitor for adverse reaction for medications for two sampled residents (Resident #87 and #112) out of 32 sampled residents. The facility census was 93 residents. Review of facility policy entitled Psychotropic Medication used in Long Term Care with an approval date of 7/20/18 showed: -Residents that received psychotropic medication would have appropriate evaluation, documentation and monitoring as defined by state and federal regulations. -Residents who have not used psychotropic medications were not given them unless it is necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record. -The purpose was to ensure that psychotropic medications were ordered only if medically necessary to treat a specific diagnoses and documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow facility policies and procedures for checking the nurse aide registry on all newly hired employees in accordance with federal requirements prior to employing four of nine employees sampled for the background screening process. The facility census was 171 residents. Record review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy and procedure dated 8/1/17, showed the purpose was to ensure facility staff was doing all that is within their power to prevent occurrences of abuse, mistreatment, exploitation, involuntary seclusion, injuries of unknown origin and misappropriation of property for all patients. It showed: -The facility will screen potential employees for a history of abuse, neglect, or mistreating patients, including checking with the appropriate licensing boards and registries. 1. Record review of the following employee records showed: -Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) F was hired on 7/7/21. There was no evidence to show the Nurse Aide Registry Check was completed. -Certified Medication Technician (CMT) D was hired on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have coordination of care between hospice (end of life) and the facility and to ensure staff were instructed where and how to retrieve the hospice providers electronic documentation for five sampled residents (Residents #45, #85, #129, #118, and #166); to transcribe ongoing hospice physician orders for two sampled residents (Residents #45 and #85); and to obtain current physician orders for hospice services for one sampled resident (Resident #118) out of 36 sampled residents. The facility census was 171 residents. Record review of the facility undated policy titled Hospice showed: -There was no outlined procedure for facility staff and Hospice staff to share communication/documentation. -There was no mention of the requirement to obtain physician orders for Hospice or palliative care services. Record review of a hospice contract between the hospice company and the facility dated 11/12/19 showed: -Both parties would allow each other to have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to safely secure the medication storage cart on multiple occurrences for one out of eight medication carts; to safely secure facility stock of over the counter medication storage cabinet for one out three storage cabinets; to label and date a multi-use vial of medication when open, and failed to ensure the crash cart was locked for one out of two crash carts. The facility census was 171 residents. Record review of the facility's Medication Storage in LTC (Long Term Care) Policy, dated 10/12/2012, showed: -Medications and biologicals were stored safely, securely and properly. -Medication supply was accessible only by licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. -Only licensed nurses and those lawfully authorized to administer medications such as Certified Medication Technicians (CMT) were allowed access to medications. -Medication rooms, carts and medication supplies were locked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) assessments were accurate and included hospice services (end of life care) for three sampled residents (Resident #25, #109, and #670) out of 36 sampled residents. The facility census was 171 residents. Record review of the facility policy titled Minimum Data Set /Quarterly Assessment Form dated November 1, 2016 showed: -The results of the assessment are used to develop, review and revise the resident's comprehensive plan of care. -The MDS Coordinator must assure that all sections of the MDS have been completed. 1. Record review of Resident #25's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of the resident's history and physical dated 6/18/21 showed he/she was enrolled with a local hospice company for end of life care at the time of admission to the facility. Record review of the resident's admission MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-25 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident and/or his/her family received a copy of the resident's baseline care plan for one sampled resident (Resident #670) out of 34 sampled residents. The facility census was 171 residents. 1. Record review of the resident's undated baseline care plan showed no documentation of the resident and/or his/her family receiving a copy. During an interview on 3/25/22 at 12:00 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said: -Baseline care plans could be completed by the admitting nurse. -He/she did not know if there was any documentation of residents and/or their families receiving copies of the baseline care plans. -He/she assumed residents and/or their families received copies of the baseline care plans since they had meetings with the residents and their families when the residents were admitted to the facility. During an interview on 3/25/22 at 1:29 P.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) G said: -If staff had received all of the necessary information, they would fill out a baseline care plan for a new resident and file it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was completed to include interventions for behaviors for one sampled resident (Resident #78) who had a diagnosis of depression out of 36 sampled residents. The facility census was 171 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #78's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including high blood pressure, anemia (iron deficiency), shortness of breath, asthma (a respiratory condition where the airway is obstructed), and depression. Record review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool to be completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 1/17/22, showed the resident: -Had significant cognitive impairment. -Did not have any mood or behavioral symptoms within the lookback period. -Was independent with ambulation, needed limited assistance with transfers and toileting, and needed extensive assistance with bathing and dressing. -Had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and document pressure sores (a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) that re-opened for one sampled resident (Resident #4); to complete weekly skin and/or wound assessments for two sampled residents (Residents #22 and #4); to discontinue applying wound care treatments once the wounds healed for one sampled resident (Resident #4); to provide ongoing wound care assessment and documentation of the resident's pressure ulcers, to update the comprehensive care plan to reflect the current condition and treatment, and to ensure appropriate physician orders for one sampled resident (Resident #52) out of 36 sampled residents. The facility census was 171 residents. Record review of the facility's Ulcer Prevention, Assessment, Treatment and Documentation in LTC (long term care) policy dated January 1, 2022 showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's order for self care of Foley Catheter (or indwelling catheter, is a tube with retaining balloon passed through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine), was obtained and to have documentation of the education provided and formal evaluation of the resident's ability to provide self-care for one sampled resident (Resident #158) who had a history of bladder infections; to ensure infection control and prevention practices were followed in managing indwelling catheters and the associated drainage system for two sampled residents (Resident #25 and #109) out of 36 sampled residents. The facility census was 171 residents. Record review of the facility Urinary Catheter care Policy and Procedure dated 12/1/2019 showed: -Responsible party for the care of the resident Foley catheter was the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Registered Nursing (RN) staff. -Catheters were to be maintained in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pharmacist's recommendations were obtained and documented, to ensure the physician responded to the pharmacist's recommendations and responded timely for one sampled resident (Resident #148) out of 36 sampled residents. The facility census was 171 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #148's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including high blood pressure, insomnia (sleep disturbance), anemia (low iron levels), dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning), depression (a common and serious medical illness that negatively affects how you feel, the way you think and how you act), anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease, typically about an imminent event or something with an uncertain outcome), constipation and pain. Record review of the resident's annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$14,901 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $14,901 — penalty dated 2025-04-30
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER INCORPORATED | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 04/06/2026 |
| AGRAWAL, MAULI | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2018 |
| ARTHUR, LAUREN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| BEATTY, KIMBERLY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| BLOCK, WILL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| CHOW, VALERIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| CIL, AKIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| COLLINS, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2017 |
| CONTRERAS, PAT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2018 |
| GIBSON, MARGARET | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| HAWN, STEVE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2018 |
| HERMANN, A.J. | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| HOWARD, JAY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| JONES, BENJAMIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| JUSTUS, JOLIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/30/2020 |
| LANKACHANDRA, KAMANI | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| LEWIS, TRACEY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2013 |
| MCDONOUGH, MADELEINE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| MCQUEEN, CLYDE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| MIMS, BONNAYE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| NASH, TROY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| NORBASH, ALEXANDER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| OTTO, JON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2016 |
| ROBINSON, MELISSA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2017 |
| ROSEMERGEY, BETH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| SHAH, JIGNESH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| SHOCKLEY, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/03/2025 |
| SHORT, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| STEELE, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 06/14/2012 |
| SHIELDS, CHARLES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/07/2014 |
| WEIR, EILEEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/01/2018 |
| CHANCE, JOLIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/03/2023 |
| PECKCHAM, LAURA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/28/2024 |
| PEEPLES-JONES, ERICA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/27/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 39 rows in the source record cover these 34 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265845. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.