No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Twin Pines Adult Care Center

1900 S Jamison, Kirksville, MO 63501 · Non profit - Other · 120 certified beds · (660) 665-2887 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (660) 665-2887 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0606) — cited Oct 2024
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Oct 2024
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1611 S Baltimore St · (660) 665-7575 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1611 S Baltimore St · (660) 956-7010 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Hy-Vee1.4 mi
500 N Baltimore St · (660) 665-7400 · Call to confirm hours
Park
18 Meadow Brook Rd · (660) 626-5286 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.8%18.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.8%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.0%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.6%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.1%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.0%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.5%17.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.9%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.8%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers10.4%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.5%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.6%23.5%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.7%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine60.8%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.5%26.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit23.1%13.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.662.111.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.252.331.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 184 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
74.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Met the expected recovery: 74.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 70 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.6%CMS range 37.3–53.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.1%CMS range 6.5–13.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge74.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge78.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened9.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.8%CMS range 5.8–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.191.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
0.73
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.30
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
44.3%
Total nursing turnover
0.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 71.2 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-10-11)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2023-01-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to treat three residents (Resident #5, #7, and #8) in a review of ten sampled residents, with respect and in a manner that maintained their dignity. The facility census was 73.Review of the facility's Dignity and Respect policy, undated, showed the following:-Every resident has a right to be treated with dignity and respect;-All staff will speak to and treat all residents with dignity and respect. 1. Review of Resident #8's Face Sheet, undated, showed the following:-The resident was readmitted on [DATE];-The resident was his/her own responsible party;-Diagnoses included dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy (wasting, shrinkage, or decrease in size of body tissues, muscles, or organs, typically resulting in reduced function), anxiety disorder (fear of or apprehension about real or perceived threats). Review of the resident's Care Plan, dated 10/27/24, showed the following:-The resident had a communication problem/potential for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide each resident with meals served at an appetizing temperature for four residents (Residents #2, 3, 4, and 7) out of ten sampled residents. The facility census was 73. Review of the facility's Monitoring Food Temperatures for Meal Service policy, dated 2016, showed the following:-Meals that are served on room trays may be periodically checked at the point of service for palatable food temperatures;-Food temperatures of hot foods on a room tray at the point of service are preferred to be at 120 degrees Fahrenheit or greater to promote palatability for the resident;-Any complaint regarding food temperatures by residents will be documented on the Food Temperature Log;-Complaints will be investigated by conducting a test tray for that meal to determine if foods are remaining above 120 degrees Fahrenheit;-The investigation is recommended to be completed with 72 hours of the complaint. 1. Review of Resident #7's quarterly Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the responsible party when one resident (Resident #9) of ten sampled residents, had medication changes and transfer to a hospital. The facility census was 73.Review of the facility's Notification of Changes Policy, dated 5/2021, showed the following:-It is the policy of this facility that changes in a resident's condition or treatment are immediately shared with the resident and/or the resident representative, according to their authority;-Notification is provided to residents and/or the resident representative(s) to promote the resident's right to make choices about care and treatment and to keep them informed of the resident's current health status. Review of the facility's Procedure for Notification of Changes for Resident policy, updated 2017, showed the following:-The nurse will immediately notify the resident and/or the resident representative(s) for a decision to transfer or discharge the resident from the facility;-The nurse will notify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to have a grievance procedure with an identified person to lead investigations, a system to inform residents of their right to file a grievance, and documentation to show the results of grievance investigations for six of six residents (Resident (R) 1, R21, R28, R38, R48, and R56) interviewed in the resident group interview. The failure had the potential to affect all residents who resided at the facility to be informed of their right to file a grievance and for the facility to resolve any grievance the residents may have. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Grievance Policy, indicated, Objective of Grievance Policy: The objective of the grievance policy is to ensure the facility makes prompt efforts to resolve grievances a resident may have. The intent of the grievance process is to support each resident's right to voice grievances (e.g., those about treatment, care, management of funds, lost clothing, or violation of rights) and to assure that after receiving a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food stored in the kitchen was labeled and dated with an open date to ensure opened food items were discarded in a timely manner. This had the potential to increase the spread of foodborne illnesses for 72 out of 72 residents that receive meals from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Storage (Dry, Refrigerated, and Frozen), 2016 Edition, revealed Guideline: Food shall be stored on shelves in a clean, dry area free from contaminants. Food shall be stored at appropriate temperatures and using appropriate methods to ensure the highest level of food safety. Procedure: 1. General storage guidelines to be followed: a. All food items will be labeled. The label must include the name of the food and the date by which it should be sold, consumed, or discarded. (1) See Date Marking Guidelines in this section for exceptions to dating individual dry storage food items . c. Discard food that has passed the expiration date, and discard food that has been prepared in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-11 · tag F0944 — widespread
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that five of five employee files reviewed had the required Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training. This failure had the potential to have a negative impact on staff for their unawareness about how to bring concerns to QAPI and in return this could impact the 72 residents currently residing at the facility. Findings include: Review of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)1's personnel file indicated CNA1's Date of Hire (DOH) was 08/16/23 and there was no evidence of CNA1 receiving the required QAPI training. Review of CNA6's personnel file indicated CNA6's DOH was 08/10/23 and there was no evidence of CNA6 receiving the required QAPI training. Review of CNA7's personnel file indicated CNA7's DOH was 03/15/23 and there was no evidence of CNA7 receiving the required QAPI training. Review of Environmental Services (ES) personnel file indicated ES's DOH was 03/12/87 and there was no evidence of ES receiving the required QAPI training. Review of Nursing Supervisor's (NS) personnel file indicated NS's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — pattern
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that three of five employee files (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 6, CNA7, and CNA1) reviewed had a background check prior to hire. This had the potential to have staff hired that have an unknown history of abuse. Findings include: Review of facility's undated policy titled, New Employee Background Check Policy, indicated, To ensure the safety and well-being of residents by conducting thorough background checks on all prospective employees, contractors, and volunteers before they are hired or engaged by the facility .Procedure: 1. Initiating Background Checks: Human Resources (HR) will request a criminal background check for all prospective employees using the appropriate state and federal systems .2. Reviewing Background Check Results: Upon receipt of the background check results, HR will review the information to determine if the prospective employee is eligible for hire. If the background check reveals disqualifying information, HR will ensure the individual does not have contact with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure three of three residents (Resident (R) 21, R41, and R2) reviewed for hospitalization out of a total sample of 22 and their representatives were given a written notice of transfer to the hospital. In addition, the Ombudsman was not notified of the monthly hospitalizations. This failure created the potential for residents or their responsible party not to have the information needed to understand their transfer to the hospital. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Transfer and Discharge from the Facility Policy, dated 2017, indicated, It is the policy of this facility that each resident has the right to remain in the facility and not transfer or discharge a resident unless a transfer or discharge from the facility is: A. Necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in the facility .The resident and representative will receive timely notification, adequate preparation, orientation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure three of three residents (Resident (R) 21, R41, and R2) reviewed for hospitalization out of a total sample of 22 residents were given a written copy of a bed hold notice within 24-hours of emergency transfer to the hospital. This failure created the potential for residents and/or responsible parties not to have the information needed to safeguard their return to the facility. Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled, Bed Hold and Return to Facility Policy and Procedure, dated 2017, indicated, It is the policy of this facility that residents who are transferred to the hospital or go on a therapeutic leave are provided with written information about the State's bed hold duration and payment amount before the transfer . Residents and their representatives will be provided with bed hold and return information at admission and before a hospital transfer or therapeutic leave . Nursing and social work staff are educated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Resident (R) 1, R23, and R24) out of 22 sampled residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitted in a timely manner. This failure has the potential of non-payment for necessary resident care. Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled, MDS Transmission for Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNF), undated, indicated, .3. Comprehensive assessments must be transmitted electronically within 14 days of the care plan completion date. All other MDS assessments must be submitted within 14 days of the MDS completion date. 1. Review of R1's admission Record, located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R1's significant change in status MDS with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 03/05/23 and located under the MDS tab in the EMR revealed MDS completed on 03/17/23 and submitted on 04/12/23 which indicated it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure three of five Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA)1, CNA6, and CNA7) completed the minimum of 12 hours of in-service training per year. The lack of in-service training could have a negative impact on all 72 residents currently residing at the facility by the staff not knowing how to care for the residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, In-Service/Employee Education, revised 06/12, indicated, It is the policy of [name of the facility] that all nursing employees receive, at a minimum, 12-hours in-service education yearly .All [name of the facility] employees are required to attend at least one block mandatory in-service yearly, covering state and federal requirement. Procedure: 2. All department directors are responsible for ensuring the continuing competency of the employees within that department .4. The mandatory block in-service will be offered monthly. 5. The mandatory block in-service will cover, at a minimum: Resident rights, abuse and neglect, infection control, body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who self-administered medications had a self-administration of medications assessment, a physician's order, and a care plan completed for two of two residents (Resident (R) 4 and R44) reviewed for self-administration of medications out of a total sample of 22 residents. Failure to assess and care plan residents for self-administration of medications increases the potential of medication errors for residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications, revised 02/2021, indicated, Resident have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. As part of the evaluation comprehensive assessment, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is safe and clinically appropriate for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the physician follow up information on a skin condition for one resident (Resident (R) 45) delaying treatment and failed to assess the need to crush medications for one resident (R5) out of a total sample of 22 residents. These failures increased the risk that residents would not receive timely and/or effective treatments. Findings include: 1. Review of R45's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) identified R45 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of R45's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), located under the RAI tab in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/01/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 which indicated R45 had short and long term memory problems, and the staff could not determine a BIMS score. R45 was identified as being dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL's). Review of R45's Nurses Note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 22 sampled residents' (Resident (R) 4) call light was present and functioning. This failure had the potential to restrict residents from calling for assistance while using the restroom. Findings include: Review of an undated, and untitled document, provided by the facility, indicated, The nurse call policy for [name of the facility] is to ensure resident can effectively communicate with staff for assistance. Here are the key points: 1. Resident Call System Requirements:. Toilet and bathing facilities: The call system must also be accessible from toilet .Functionality: The system must be fully operational at all times .with alternative communication methods in place if necessary.'' Review of R4's admission Record, located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an interview and observation on 10/08/24 at 10:20 AM, R4 stated she fell while in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement sanitary practices and conditions within the dietary department to prevent the potential for contamination of food during storage, preparation, and distribution. The facility census was 67. Observations on 01/24/23 between 8:50 A.M. and 9:14 A.M. showed the following: -Dietary Aide prepared food in the kitchen. He/She had a beard and was not wearing a beard restraint; -Dietary Aide Y prepared food in the kitchen. His/Her hair was not completely covered with a hairnet, the sides of his/her hair hung out from under the hairnet; -The dietary manager prepared food in the kitchen. His/Her hair hung out from under his/her hairnet and was not completely covered. Observation on 1/24/23 at 8:58 A.M., showed a heavy brown/black buildup on the inside of the convection oven. Observation on 1/24/23 at 11:30 A.M., showed the front of the deep fryer, both sides of the fryer, and the side of the stove were covered with a thick layer of grease and food debris. During interview on 01/24/23 at 2:25 P.M., the dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update and revise the comprehensive care plans for four residents (Residents #10, #24, #30, and #48) in a review of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility's undated policy, Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plans, showed the following: -It is the policy of the facility to promote seamless interdisciplinary care for our residents by utilizing the interdisciplinary plan of care based on assessment, planning, treatment, service and intervention. It is utilized to plan for and manage resident care as evidenced by documentation from admission through discharge for each resident; -The care plan will contain information about the physical, emotional/psychological, psychosocial, spiritual, educational and environmental needs as appropriate; -It is our purpose to ensure that each resident is provided with individualized, goal-directed care, which is reasonable, measurable and based on resident needs. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-30 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 7. Review of Resident #10's care plan, revised 11/21/22, showed the following: -He/She was independent for transferring; -The resident was independent for repositioning and turning in bed; -Bed rail as needed or desired for increased mobility and transfers. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -His/Her cognition was moderately impaired; -He/She had diagnoses of non-traumatic brain dysfunction and dementia; -He/She was independent with bed mobility. Review of the resident's physician's order sheet showed no orders for a bed rail. Observation on 1/26/23 at 9:18 A.M. showed the following: -The resident lay in his/her bed with his/her eyes closed; -The resident's bed had 1/4 bed rails on both sides of the bed; -The head of the bed was elevated and the resident's bed rail located closest to the door was in the raised position. During an interview on 1/30/23 at 12:36 P.M., the resident said he/she used the bed rail located on his/her bed to help him/her get out of bed. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove expired stock medication from the medication room and medication carts, failed to date an open insulin vial for one resident (Resident #22), and failed to keep medications secured when staff left a medication cart unlocked and unattended in a hallway when passing medications. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility's policy, Destruction/Returning of Discontinued Medications, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Purpose: To assure discontinued medications are either destroyed in a timely manner or returned to the pharmacy; -Resident medications that have been discontinued by the physician shall be either destroyed on the premises or returned to the pharmacy (in accordance with pharmacy policy and state and federal law) within 30 days; -Outdated, contaminated or deteriorated medications or non-returnable medications of a deceased resident shall be destroyed within 30 days; -All medication destruction, including controlled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff performed acceptable infection control practices to prevent contamination when staff failed to place oxygen tubing in a plastic bag while not in use and placed contaminated nasal cannula prongs in one resident's (Resident #51) nares of 21 sampled residents. The facility also failed to ensure staff did not handle medication with their bare hands for one resident (Resident #30). Staff failed to follow appropriate handwashing after peri-care and the removal of a soiled dressing, touching the resident and supplies with soiled gloves for one resident (Resident #29). The facility's census was 67. Review of the facility's Hand Hygiene policy, dated 2019, showed the following: -Hand hygiene consistent with accepted standards of practice such as the use of alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) instead of soap and water in all clinical situations except when: -Hands are visibly soiled (e.g., blood, body fluids); -Staff must perform hand hygiene even if gloves are utilized. Review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standard of practice by failure to follow the facility's policy for Hypoglycemic (low blood sugar) Protocol for one resident (Resident #65), who presented with a low blood sugar, during a closed record review in a review of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility policy Hypoglycemic Protocol, dated 1/27/09 and reviewed/revised 2/8/10, showed the following: -Policy: The facility provides the necessary care and services to ensure that each resident attains or maintains the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the resident's comprehensive assessment and plan of care; -Procedure: Initial Evaluation: If blood sugar is found to be less than 60, assess resident's cognitive function and level of consciousness. If found to be at baseline, then proceed with Management of Mild Hypoglycemia pathway. If cognitive function or level of consciousness is impaired from baseline, then proceed with Management of Severe Hypoglycemia pathway;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately recognize, evaluate and manage pain for one resident (Resident #30), in a review of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 67. During interview on 1/30/23 at 2:30 P.M., the Director of Nurses said the facility did not have a policy for pain. A comprehensive pain assessment was completed at admission, weekly for four weeks, quarterly and with a significant change. Review of Resident #30's face sheet, undated, showed his/her diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (a progressive and debilitating neurological disorder that affects movement and often includes tremors), restless leg syndrome (a condition characterized by a nearly irresistible urge to move the legs, typically in the evenings and/or while sitting or lying down) and depression. Review of the resident's Discharge Assessment, Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be completed by facility staff, dated 12/20/22, showed the following: -Cognition intact; -Required extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-30 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolated
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure five nurse aides (NA N, NA O, NA P, NA Q and NA R) completed a nurse aide training program within four months of their employment in the facility. The facility census was 67. 1. During email correspondence on 2/1/23 at 10:57 A.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) said the facility did not have a policy that addressed nurse aide training. 2. Record review of Nurse Aide (NA) N's employee file showed the following: -Date of Hire: 11/24/21; -NA A classroom and on the job training hours completed on 8/26/22; -NA A approved for Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) final examination and not completed; -The facility failed to ensure the completion of the program within four months of the hire date. 3. Record review of NA O's employee file showed the following: -Date of Hire: 2/3/22; -NA A classroom and on the job training hours completed on 8/26/22; -NA A approved for CNA final examination and not completed; -The facility failed to ensure the completion of the program within four months of the hire date. 4. Record review of NA P's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pneumococcal (lung inflammation caused by bacterial or viral infection) vaccines to two residents (Residents #6 and #59), in a review of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility policy, Pneumococcal Vaccine Program, dated 2020, showed the following: -It is the policy of this facility that residents will be offered immunization(s) against pneumococcal disease in accordance with Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations; -There are two pneumococcal vaccines indicated for use among adults 65 years and older: 13 valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23); -A physician order for both PPSV23 and PCV13 is required; -The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for the CDC recommends a routine single dose of PPSV23 for adults [AGE] years of age. Shared clinical decision-making is recommended regarding administration of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff wore proper hair restraints during meal preparation and service. The facility census was 64. Observations on 6/04/19 between 9:12 A.M. through 12:42 P.M. during the noon meal preparation showed the following: -At 9:39 A.M. [NAME] W had a beard and did not wear a beard restraint. He/She dished up fruit for lunch in the main kitchen; -At 10:04 A.M. [NAME] X had a mustache that was not covered with a hair restraint. He/She prepared food in the main kitchen for the noon meal. The dietary manager's mustache was not covered. He walked around the main kitchen while the noon meal was being prepared. Two electrical workers were working in the kitchen area with no hairnets. One electrical worker had a beard that was not covered; -At 10:51 A.M., the electrical worker, who had a beard, was in the kitchen with no beard restraint. [NAME] W was in the main kitchen preparing the noon meal. He/She did not bear a beard restraint. [NAME] X and the dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff washed their hands after each direct resident contact and when indicated by professional standards of practice during personal care for two residents (Residents #8 and #116), in a review of 16 sampled residents; failed to wash hands and apply gloves when administering eye drops for one resident (Resident #19); and failed to develop a facility policy to address Legionella. The facility census was 64. 1. Review of the undated facility policy, Wash Hands, showed the following: -Apply a generous amount of soap to hands. Do not use bar soap; -Scrub hands for at least 15 seconds. Wash palms and back of hands with at least ten circular motions. Wash fingers and between fingers with at least ten circular motions. Wash wrists with at least ten circular motions, and wash around and under fingernails; -Rinse wrists and hands well. Keep wrists lower than elbows. 2. Review of the facility policy Soiled Laundry and Bedding from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-06-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment by not ensuring water from the showers in residents' rooms on the 300 hall was contained to the showers and did not present as a hazard to other areas in the bathroom. The facility census was 64. Observations on 6/4/19 between 8:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. showed the following: -Occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had a shower that ran water out onto the floor in the bathroom; -Occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had a shower that ran water out onto the floor in the bathroom; -Occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had a shower that ran water out onto the floor in the bathroom; -Occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had a shower that ran water out onto the floor in the bathroom; -Occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had a shower that ran water out onto the floor in the bathroom; -Occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had a shower that ran water out onto the floor in the bathroom; -Occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had a shower that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-06-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update the plan of care with interventions identified following falls for four residents (Residents #8, #13, #25, and #37), in a review of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 64. 1. Review of the facility's policy, Resident Care Plan Procedure, undated, showed the following: -The care plan must be reviewed and revised (updated) as necessary, but at least every three months. Problems, goals, and approaches must be reviewed and revised when appropriate and necessary; three months is the maximum time limit for care. Three months may be too long and not reasonable for certain short-term goals. Care plans may need to be revised when new orders are obtained; -NOTE: Remember the resident care plan is the tool used to coordinate all care provided to the resident to be sure care is necessary, appropriate, and planned to meet the individual needs of the resident consonant with the physician's plan of care for the resident. 2. Review of the Long-Term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-06-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided three residents (Residents #8, #14, and #116), who were unable to perform their own activities of daily living, the necessary care and services to maintain good personal and oral hygiene, in a review of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 64. 1. Review of the Nurse Assistant in a Long-Term Care Facility manual, 2001 revised edition, showed the procedures staff was to follow when providing perineal care for a male (steps 7 through 13) included the following: -Cover the resident; -Expose the perineal areas, wash the penis from the tip downward, rinse, and dry (specific instructions for uncircumcised); -Wash and rinse the scrotum; -Wash and rinse other skin areas between the legs; -Wash and rinse the anal area; -Pat the area dry. For the female resident (steps 7 through 14) included the following: -Cover the resident; -Expose the perineal area, wash the inner legs and outer peri area along the outside of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-06-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities based on the activity assessment with specific goals and approaches, taking into account the resident's needs, strengths, and preference as part of a comprehensive care plan for two residents (Residents #14 and #46), who resided in the special care unit, in a review of 16 sampled residents. The facility census showed eight residents resided in the special care unit. The facility census was 46. 1. Review of the facility's undated policy, Resident Activities, showed the following: -Provision is made for rehabilitative and restorative activities under the direction and supervision of the activities director; -Provision is also made for religious, recreational, diversional, intellectual/educational activities designed to give patients entertainment, inter-communication, exercise, relaxation, opportunity to express creative talent and fulfill basic psychological, social and spiritual needs, under the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-06-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper safety techniques were utilized during transfers for two residents (Residents #6 and #14), in a review of 16 sampled residents, and during transport in a wheelchair for one additional resident (Resident #216). The facility failed to secure a wardrobe closet after it fell on one resident (Resident #11). The facility failed to ensure exit doors equipped with a Wanderguard system (a system for locking and/or alarming doors when residents with a Wanderguard device approach the door) functioned properly in the presence of the Wanderguard device. The facility census was 64. 1. Review of the facility's undated policy, Gait Belt Policy, showed the following: -Purpose: To assure the patient and caregiver safety during transfers and ambulation; -It is recommended the patient wear a gait belt when staff and caregivers are transferring or ambulating the patient. The gait belt provides a firm grasping surface for the staff person and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-06-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility census was 64. Observation on 6/4/19 showed the following: -At 12:33 P.M., staff served the first resident in the [NAME] dining room (satellite kitchen 1). Staff continued to serve residents from the steam table. The main entree for the meal was chicken; -At 12:59 P.M., the test tray was received immediately after the last resident was served. The temperature of the non-barbequed chicken (chicken served to residents on low salt and low concentrated sweet diets) was 111 degrees Fahrenheit, and ground barbequed chicken was 109 degrees Fahrenheit. The chicken was cool when taste tested. Observation on 6/5/19 showed the following: -At 12:02 P.M., staff served the first resident in the Parc Place dining room (satellite kitchen 2). Staff continued to serve residents from the steam table. The main entree for the meal was barbequed ribs; -At 12:15 P.M., the test tray was received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-06-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure the policy for pneumococcal vaccinations was consistent with the current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines; failed to offer and vaccinate eligible residents with the pneumococcal vaccines as indicated by the current guidelines, unless the resident had previously received the vaccines, refused, or had a medical contraindication present; and failed to ensure the medical record included evidence education was provided to the resident or the resident's representative on the benefits and potential side effects of the pneumococcal vaccination for two residents (Residents #116 and #13), in a review of 16 sampled residents, and two additional residents (Residents #20 and #62). The facility census was 64. 1. Review of the facility policy Pneumococcal Vaccine Policy, dated 2017, showed the following: -Purpose was to minimize the risk of residents acquiring, transmitting or experiencing complications from pneumococcal disease by ensuring that each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for one resident (Resident #116) who had enteral feedings through a gastrostomy tube (surgically placed tube into the stomach for enteral nutritional feedings), in a review of 16 sampled residents. The facility reported three residents with feeding tubes. The facility census was 64. Review of Resident #116's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 5/5/19, showed the following: -Severely impaired cognition; -Feeding tube; -Diagnoses included dementia and stroke. Review of the resident's care plan, revised 5/24/19, showed the following: -Diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing); -The resident is to receive nothing by mouth (NPO) and receives feeding through a gastrostomy tube; -The resident receives Jevity 1.2 (a high-protein, fiber-fortified nutrition that provides complete, balanced nutrition for tube feeding) at 50 milliliters (ml)/hour continuous. Review of the resident's physician order, dated June…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician when staff identified a newly developed Stage II pressure ulcer (partial thickness skin loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough), and failed to obtain a physician order for treatment for one resident (Resident #216), in a review of 16 sampled residents. The facility reported four residents with pressure ulcers. The facility census was 64. 1. Review of the facility's undated policy, Pressure Ulcers (Decubitus Ulcers), showed the following: -Promote healing of pressure ulcers; -See physician orders for treatment to be done for each pressure ulcer. Follow orders; -Pressure ulcers are to be measured at least weekly. Document each time treatment is done. Give detailed documentation at least weekly. If any significant changes occur, they are to be reported to the physician immediately. Document changes immediately and all conversations held with the physician or office…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-01-30 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the census and total hours worked by nursing staff (registered nurse (RN), certified nurse assistant (CNA), certified medication technician (CMT), and licensed practical nurse (LPN)) for each shift. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility's undated policy, New Staff Posting Form Instructions, showed the following: -Staff posting form will be initiated by the day shift house supervisor (HS). It needs to be filled out for the 7-3 shift by 9:00 A.M.; -The 3-11 and 11-7 HS will fill out the information for their shift by first break; -All HSs will need to update staffing and census changes that occurs during their shifts. Be sure when you leave that the activity/information that occurred during your shift is accurate. 1. Observation on 1/24/23 at 2:37 P.M. showed staffing posted on [NAME] Court and Monterey Terrace was dated for 1/19/23. Observation on 1/27/23 at 9:10 A.M., showed the following: -The staffing and census for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
RICHARDSON, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2012
ADAIR COUNTY NURSING HOME DISTRICTOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/15/2018
BELL, AURORAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2023
BESLER, WENDYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2008

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-18.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 36%Medicare 19%Other / private 45%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$326per resident / day
operating cost
$9,908per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$276per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265198. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next