No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hickory Manor

209 Hickory Street, Licking, MO 65542 · For profit - Individual · 60 certified beds · (573) 674-2111 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (573) 674-2111 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0607) — most recent Apr 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0741, F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (79%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 29% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
107 E Pine St · (417) 967-1100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
100 Deer Lick St · (573) 674-2995 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
117 E Highway 32 · (573) 674-3734 · Call to confirm hours
Park
209 Hickory St · (573) 674-2111 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased30.9%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight18.3%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.3%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.1%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.7%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened26.7%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.2%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.3%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.8%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.9%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.8%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine39.3%63.5%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.592.111.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days5.032.331.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.7%CMS range 28.7–59.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 7.1–18.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.241.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
0.51
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.69
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.70
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
78.8%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 37.1 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 79% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-30)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing at least two calendar days before discharge from skilled services. This notice informs the beneficiary about potential non-coverage and the option to continue services with the beneficiary accepting the financial liability for those services. This practice affected one resident (Resident #31) out of two sampled residents. The facility census was 39.Review of the facility's policy titled, Medicare Advance Beneficiary and Medicare Non-Coverage Notices, undated, showed:- A resident (who is a Medicare beneficiary) is informed in advance and in writing when Medicare payment denial or change in coverage is likely;- Written notices of the likelihood of Medicare payment denial are provided to the resident/beneficiary:- As soon as the facility makes the assessment that Medicare payment certainly or probably will not be made and before the item or service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean and comfortable homelike environment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 39. Review of the facility's policy titled, Homelike Environment, revised February 2021, showed:- Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment;- The facility maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting;- These characteristics include a clean, sanitary and orderly environment. 1. Observations on 04/27/26 at 8:20 A.M., 04/28/26 at 3:39 P.M., and 03/29/26 at 9:11 A.M., of the dining room showed:- Three windows, approximately eight feet (ft.) by three ft., with a foggy condensation build up inside the panes of the glass obstructing and/or preventing visibility. 2. Observation on 04/27/26 at 9:57 A.M., of room [ROOM NUMBER] showed:- A toilet seat lid unattached and not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly assess the use of a bed and chair alarm (devices that contain sensors that trigger an alarm when they detect a change in pressure) to determine if utilized as restraints (a device that limits a person's movement), failed to identify a medical symptom that supported the use of the alarms, and failed to document the least restrictive use for the alarms for one resident (Resident #5) out of one sampled resident. The facility census was 39.Review of facility policy titled, Use of Restraints, revision date April 2017, showed:- Restraints shall only be used for the safety and well-being of the resident(s) and only after other alternatives have been tried unsuccessfully;- Restraints shall only be used to treat the resident's medical symptoms(s) and never for staff convenience, or for the prevention of falls;- When the use of restraints is indicated, the least restrictive alternative will be used for the least amount of time necessary, and the ongoing re-evaluation for the need of restraints will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pre-employment screenings were completed for abuse, neglect or misappropriation of property by verifying employees through the Nurse Aide Registry and Employee Disqualification List (EDL) for six employees (Employees #2, #3, #5, #6 , #7, and #9) of 10 sampled employees, placing all of the residents at risk for potential abuse or neglect. The facility's census was 39.Review of the facility's policy titled, Fiscal Services Manual, dated February 2022, showed:- Check Nurse Aide (CNA) Registry for all new hires. Complete this because some employees may have a federal indicator (a permanent ban from employment in nursing homes) on the Nurse Aide Registry that does not show up when they apply for other positions. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, not dated, showed:- It is the policy of this facility to not tolerate abuse of residents by any individual;- It is the facility policy that all employees be checked against the state CNA registry to ensure no one is employed who is excluded on this list;-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) assessment within 14 days of admission to hospice services for one resident (Resident #27) out of one sampled resident. The facility census was 39.Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Assessments, dated October 2023, showed:- Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 (OBRA - a federal legislation reforming nursing home care) required assessments are federally mandated, and therefore, must be performed for all residents of Medicare and/or Medicaid certified nursing homes. OBRA assessments include: a. admission assessment; b. Quarterly assessment; c. Annual assessment; d. Significant change in status assessment;- The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) user's manual provides detailed information on timing and submission of assessments;- The resident assessment coordinator is responsible for ensuring the interdisciplinary team conducts timely and appropriate resident assessments. 1. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) for one resident (Resident #7) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 39. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022, showed:- A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet residents' physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident;- The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven days of the completion of the required MDS assessment (Admission, Annual or Significant Change in Status), and no more than 21 days after admission;- The interdisciplinary team (IDT - a group of healthcare professionals from diverse fields who work in a coordinated effort toward a common goal for a resident) reviews and updates the care plan: a. when there has been a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans with specific interventions to meet individual needs for two residents (Residents #2 and #3) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 39.Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022, showed:- The interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident;- The comprehensive, person-centered care plan: includes measurable objectives and timeframes, describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, including: services that would otherwise be provided for the above, but are not provided due to the resident exercising his/her rights, including the right to refuse treatment, any specialized services to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update and revise care plans with specific interventions tailored to meet individual needs for one resident (Resident #7) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 39. Review of the facility's policy titled, Revising Care Plans, undated, showed:- It is the policy of this facility to ensure that all comprehensive care plans are reviewed and revised promptly to reflect changes in the resident's condition, treatment, or goals of care;- Care plan revisions are essential to ensure individualized, person-centered, and safe care and to promote accurate, updated interventions that reflect the resident's needs and preferences;- Care plans must be reviewed and revised quarterly, upon a significant change, new physician's orders that impact resident care, after hospitalizations or acute medical events, and upon resident/family request or concerns;- Nurses and other direct care staff must promptly notify the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT - a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff followed professional standards of practice for medication administration for one resident (Resident #11) out of 12 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to follow facility policy and accepted standards of nursing practice during transdermal pain patch (medicated adhesive patch applied to the skin to deliver a specific dose of medication) administration. The facility census was 39.Review of the facility policy titled, Transdermal Drug Delivery System Patch Application, revised July 2024, showed:- Remove the old patch from the body;- Wear gloves when handling patches;- Rotate patch application sites to prevent irritation;- Dispose of patches appropriately. 1. Review of Resident #11's medical record showed:- admitted on [DATE];- Diagnosis of chronic pain. Observation on 04/30/26 at 12:09 P.M., of the resident's transdermal pain patch administration showed:- Licensed Practical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment during smoking by not providing adequate supervision while smoking and failed to complete smoking assessments at least quarterly for one resident (Resident #7) out of four residents. The facility census was 39. Review of the facility's policy titled, Facility Smoking Policy and Procedure, undated, showed:- Purpose: To set guidelines and safety standards for residents who smoke;- Policy: A smoking assessment will be completed on admission for each resident who smokes to determine if they are capable of safely smoking unsupervised. The facility will also perform the same assessment, quarterly or as needed for change of condition to ensure those residents who smoke unsupervised are able to do so safely;- The facility will provide a staff member to supervise during scheduled smoking times. Staff will oversee the entire smoke time, ensuring that residents are dressed appropriately and all safety measures are followed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess, and provide supportive interventions for one resident (Resident #7) with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event - either experiencing it or witnessing it; symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares, and severe anxiety, as well as uncontrollable thoughts about the event) out of one sampled resident. The facility census was 39.Review of the facility's policy titled, Trauma Informed Care and Culturally Competent Care, revised August 2022, showed:- To guide staff in providing care that is culturally competent and trauma-informed in accordance with professional standards of practice;- To address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization;- Trauma results from an event, series of events, or sets of circumstances that is experienced by an individual as physically or emotionally harmful or life threatening and that has lasting adverse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health services and implement effective behavioral interventions for one resident (Resident #7) out of one sampled resident reviewed for behavioral health needs. The facility failed to assess, monitor, care plan, and intervene for ongoing verbally aggressive, disruptive, and maladaptive behaviors that affected other residents and staff. The facility census was 39.Review of the facility policy titled, Behavioral Assessment, Intervention, and Monitoring, revised February 2025, showed the facility would identify behavioral symptoms, evaluate the severity and safety risks of behaviors, develop individualized interventions, monitor the effectiveness of interventions, and document changes in resident behavior. 1. Review of Resident #7's medical record showed:- admitted on [DATE];- Own responsible party;- Diagnoses of bipolar disorder (mood disorder that can cause intense mood swings), anxiety (persistent worry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - precautions for use during high-contact resident care activities for residents infected with a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO - microorganisms that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents) or any resident who has a chronic wound and/or indwelling medical device) for two residents (Residents #6 and #9). The facility also failed to perform hand hygiene and change gloves during wound care for one resident (Resident #6) out of four sampled residents and during medication administration for one resident (Resident #11) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 39. Review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, undated, showed:- EBP refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of MDROs that employs targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities;- EBP will be initiated for residents with any of the following: Wounds (e.g. chronic wounds such as pressure ulcers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to control the fly population in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 39.Review of the facility's policy titled, Pest Control, dated May 2008, showed:- Our facility shall maintain an effective pest control program;- This facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure the building is kept free of insects and rodents. Review of the facility's pest control invoice, dated 04/23/26, showed:- Services did not target flies;- An exit door didn't close/seal properly and required installation of weather stripping. 1. Observations on 04/27/26 of the dining room showed:- At 12:25 P.M., a visitor entered the dining room with a fly swatter in his/her hand and swatted flies at the resident's table;- At 12:38 P.M., three flies buzzed around Resident #3 and crawled on his/her back;- At 12:48 P.M., three flies crawled on a resident's dining table near the back of the dining room;- At 12:50 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers for one resident (Resident #1) out of four sampled residents. The facility's census was 39 Review of facility's policy titled, Bath, Shower/Tub dated 2001, showed: - The purpose of this procedure is to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to observe the condition of the resident's skin. Resident will have bath/shower per their request; - Documentation: the date, time the shower/tub bath was performed; name and title of who performed shower/tub bath; all assessment data (skin assessment) obtained during shower/tub bath; If resident refused the shower/tub bath and reasons; Notify supervisor if the resident refuses the shower/tub bath with reasons. Review of Resident #1's medical record showed: - An admission date of 02/04/25; - Diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), Peripheral vascular disease (a slow and progressive circulation disorder caused by narrowing, blockage or spasms in a blood vessel), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure to complete Criminal Background Checks (CBC) for four of the ten sampled staff prior to hire and to check the Nurses Aide (NA) Registry for all new staff before the employment date to ensure they did not have a Federal Indicator (a marker given by the federal government to individuals who have committed abuse/neglect) for seven of the ten sampled staff. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention, dated September 2021, showed: - Background checks will be done at the time of hire in accordance with the facility background check policy. Staff will not be hired who have been found guilty, or plead nolo contendere (a plea of no contest) of abuse, neglect, mistreatment of residents, or misappropriation of resident property by a court of law. Such determination will not be limited to residents but shall include any known abusive acts against others; - The nurse aide registry will be checked prior to employment, nurse aides will not be hired whose name is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an accurate baseline care plan (the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident) upon admission with specific interventions for one resident (Resident #191) out of one sampled resident. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans - Baseline, revised March 2022, showed: - A baseline plan of care is developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs; - The baseline care plan includes instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care; - The resident and/or representative are provided a written summary of the baseline care plan that includes, but not limited to: stated goals and objectives of the resident, summary of the resident's medications and dietary instructions, any services/treatments to be administered by the facility, and any updated information based on the details of the comprehensive care plan, as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a care plan with specific interventions to meet individual needs for four residents (Residents #4, #5, #12, and #38) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans - Comprehensive, revised September 2010, showed: - An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychological needs is developed for each resident; - The facility's Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team (IDT - a group of healthcare professionals from diverse fields who work in a coordinated effort toward a common goal for a resident), in coordination with the resident, his/her family or representative (sponsor), develops and maintains a comprehensive care plan for each resident that identifies the highest functioning the resident may be expected to attain; - The comprehensive care plan is based on a thorough assessment that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for oxygen (O2) for two residents (Residents #3 and #14) out of three sampled residents and wound care for one resident (Resident #5) out of three sampled residents. The facility's census was 37. Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, dated October 2010, showed: - The purpose of the procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration; - Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure; - Review the the physician's orders or facility's protocol for oxygen administration; - Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident; - While the resident is receiving oxygen therapy, assess for cyanosis (blue tone to the skin), hypoxia (low level of oxygen in the tissues), oxygen toxicity (lung damage that happens from breathing in too much extra or supplemental oxygen) and vital signs. The facility did not provide a policy on following physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for a house supplement recommendation by the registered dietician (RD) and failed to ensure the RD completed a nutritional assessment due to significant weight loss for four residents (Residents #4, #24, #34 and #38) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility's policy titled, Monthly Dietary Consultant Report, undated, showed: - A report of RD activities shall be made in writing or completed electronically and provided to the facility in hard copy or electronic format at the close of each consultation; - The monthly consultant report is to: serve as a communication tool between consultations, provide documentation that a consultation was provided according to state and federal regulations, avoid verbal misunderstanding of RD recommendations and findings, assist the consultant in planning for future consultations, assist the Dining Service Manager in correcting areas of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff reconciled narcotics (a process that allows one staff to reconcile the exact narcotic inventory on hand with another staff) at each shift change for two out of two sampled medication carts. This practice had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility's policy, titled, Controlled Substances, revised November 2022, showed: - Controlled substance inventory is monitored and reconciled to identify loss or potential diversion in a manner that minimizes the time between loss/diversion and detection/follow-up; - Nursing staff count controlled medication inventory at the end of each shift, using these records to reconcile the inventory count; - The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty make the count together and document and report any discrepancies to the Director of Nursing (DON) services. 1. Review of the 100 Hall Certified Medication Technician (CMT) Narcotic Count Log for Controlled Substances on 01/22/25 at 9:45 A.M., showed: - For the 5 A.M. - 11 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor the drug regimen for unnecessary medications by not ensuring the as needed (PRN) psychotropic (medications that affect a persons mental state) medication orders were limited to 14 days unless specific duration and clinical rationale were provided for one resident (Resident #18) out of five sampled residents and one resident (Resident #19) outside the sample. The facility failed to ensure a gradual dose reductions (GDR) was attempted for four residents (Residents #7, #14, #18 and #24) out of five sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure an appropriate diagnosis for the use of a psychotropic medication for one resident (Resident #24) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility's policy titled, Tapering Medications and Gradual Drug Dose Reduction, revised July 2022, showed: - Residents who use psychotropic medications shall receive gradual dose reductions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue the use of such drugs; - The physician will order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP) during wound care for two residents (Resident #5 and #191) out of three sampled residents and one resident (Resident #12) outside the sample. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, reviewed March 2024, showed: - Enhanced barrier precautions are utilized to reduce the transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents; - EBPs employ targeted gown and glove use in addition to standard precautions during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not otherwise apply; - Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring the use of gown and gloves for EBPs include: a. dressing; b. bathing/showering; c. transferring; d. providing hygiene; e. changing linens; f. changing briefs or assisting with toileting; g. device care or use (central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy/ventilator, etc.); h. wound care (any skin opening requiring a dressing); - EBPs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans in seven days after completion of the comprehensive assessment and no more than 21 days after admission to properly care for two residents (Residents #1 and #2) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 36. Review of the facility policy, Care Plans; Comprehensive Person Centered, dated March 2022, showed: - A comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetable to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; - The comprehensive person centered care plan is developed within seven days after completion of the required Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), and no more than 21 days after admission; - The comprehensive, person-centered care plan includes measurable objectives and time frames, describes the services that are to be furnished…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for four residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #5) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 39. The facility did not provide a policy. 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record showed: - An admission date of 11/16/23; - Diagnoses of weakness, confusion, cerebral vascular accident (CVA (stroke), damage to the brain from interrupted blood supply), arteriosclerotic heart disease (ASHD, a thickening and hardening of the walls of the coronary arteries), congestive heart failure (CHF, an inability of the heart to pump sufficient blood flow to meet the body's needs), orthostatic hypotension (a form of low blood pressure that happens when standing up from sitting or lying down), right abdomen mass, anxiety (persistent worry and fear about everyday situations), hypertension (HTN, high blood pressure), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD, stomach acid being forced back into the throat region), pain, and atrial fibrillation (a-fib, heart dysrhythmia); - An order, dated 05/28/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-11 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dumpster was maintained to keep pests out and/or to keep the garbage contained in the dumpster. This failure had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 35. Review of the facility's policy titled, Food-Related Garbage and Refuse Disposal, revised October 2017, showed the outside dumpsters provided by the garbage pickup services will be kept closed and free of surrounding litter. 1. Observations on 01/08/24 at 11:00 A.M., 01/09/24 at 10:45 A.M., 01/10/24 at 2:00 P.M., and 1:53 P.M., and 01/11/24 at 9:03 A.M., of the outside trash dumpster located near the kitchen entrance showed one 6-yard (yd.) dumpster partially filled with the one plastic lid completely opened. During an interview on 01/11/24 at 9:00 A.M., the Dietary Manager said the dietary staff removed the trash at the end of their shifts daily. Trash bags were usually tossed in the dumpster, and it was left open for the next time it needed to be filled, but it should be closed. During an interview on 01/11/24 at 9:04…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to document a complete and accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment to be completed by the facility) for two residents (Resident #3, and #18) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility's census was 35. Review of the facility's Resident Assessment policy, revised March, 2022, showed: - The resident assessment coordinator is responsible for ensuring that the interdisciplinary team conducts timely and appropriate resident assessments and reviews; - A comprehensive assessment includes a completion of the MDS. 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record showed: - An admission date on 07/17/23; - Diagnoses of dementia (the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), diabetes mellitus (DM) (a condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (an enlargement of the prostate causing difficulty in urination); - No documentation of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement care plans with specific interventions tailored to meet individual needs for three residents (Resident #2, #9, and #28) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 35. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan, revised 03/2022, showed: - A comprehensive, person centered care plan includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs and is developed and implemented for each resident; - Builds on the resident's strength; - Reflects currently recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions. 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record showed: - admitted on [DATE]; - Diagnoses of dementia (progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning), Parkinson's (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement), aggression, and agitation; - An order for haloperidol (an antipsychotic medication) 2 milligram (mg) by mouth every 12 hours as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order and failed to complete a resident assessment and safety evaluation for the use of a trapeze (a device designed to assist residents in changing positions) for one resident (Resident #27) out of one sampled resident. The facility census was 35. The facility did not provide a policy regarding trapeze use. 1. Review of Resident #27's Physician's Order Sheet (POS), dated January 2024, showed: - admission date of 08/31/22; - Diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus (DM) (a condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), anxiety (persistent worry and fear about everyday situations), depression (a serious medical illness that negatively affects how you feel, the way you think and how you act), bipolar disorder (a mental disorder that causes unusual shifts in mood) and morbid obesity; - No order for a trapeze. Review of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for two residents (Resident #18 and #27) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 35. The facility did not provide a policy related to following physician's orders. 1. Review of Resident #18's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated January 2024, showed: - Diagnoses of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (enlargement of the prostate causing difficulty in urination), hearing loss, and obstructive uropathy (disorder of the urinary tract that occurs due to obstructed urinary flow); - An order to change the Foley catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) size 16 french with 10 milliliter (ml) balloon monthly (on the 19th) and as needed for obstructive uropathy, dated 09/23/22; - An order to change hearing aid batteries every Friday, dated 03/24/23. Review of the resident's Treatment Administration Record (TAR), dated December 2023, showed: - No documentation of the Foley catheter changed with one out of one opportunity missed; - No documentation of the hearing aids…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess residents for the use of bed rails prior to installation and use nor did they obtain informed consent from the resident or if applicable, the resident representative for two residents (Resident #18 and #27) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility's census was 35. Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Safety and Bed Rails, revised August 2022, showed: - The resident's sleeping environment is evaluated by the interdisciplinary team; - Bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails are checked for compatibility and size; - Bed dimensions are appropriate for resident's size; - The use of bed rails or side rails is prohibited unless the criteria for the use if bed rails have been met, including attempts to use alternatives, interdisciplinary evaluation, resident assessment, and informed consent.; - Alternatives to the use of bed or side rails that are attempted include roll guards, foam bumpers, lowering the bed, and/or use of concave…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing data with all the required components in a clear and readable format in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors on a daily basis. The facility's census was 35. The facility did not provide a nurse staffing policy. Observations of the facility showed: - On 01/08/24 at 11:45 A.M., and 2:30 P.M., no documentation of the nurse staffing posted; - On 01/09/24 at 9:10 A.M., and 1:05 P.M., no documentation of the nurse staffing posted; - On 01/10/24 at 10:30 A.M., no documentation of the nurse staffing posted. During an interview on 01/10/24 at 10:30 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) A said the nurse staffing sheets were completed and placed into the hanging folder on the door across from the nurse's station. The nurse staffing sheets were not visible to the residents or visitors. They were completed at the start of each shift but one had not been completed for 01/10/24. During an interview on 01/10/24 at 10:35 A.M., the Administrator said the staffing sheets should be posted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy consultant identified an appropriate diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic (a medication used to treat psychosis or the loss of connection to reality) medication during the pharmacist's monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) for three residents (Resident #2, #9, and #18) out of three sampled residents. The facility's census was 35. Review of the facility's policy titled, Antipsychotic Medication Use, revised July 2022, showed: - Residents will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat a specific condition for which they are indicated and effective; - The attending physician and other staff will gather and document information to clarify a resident's behavior, mood, function, medical condition, specific symptoms, and risks to the resident and others; - The attending physician will identify, evaluate and document, with input from other disciplines and consultants as needed, symptoms that may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic (a medication used to treat psychosis or the loss of connection to reality) medication for three residents (Resident #2, #9, and #18) out of three sampled residents and failed to limit the use of an as needed (PRN) psychotropic (a psychoactive drug taken to exert an effect on the chemical makeup of the brain and nervous system) medication to 14 days or to document the rationale for extending the order for three residents (Resident #2, #14, #25) out of 12 sampled residents during the pharmacist's monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR). The facility's census was 35. Review of the facility's policy titled, Antipsychotic Medication Use, revised July 2022, showed: - Residents will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat a specific condition for which they are indicated and effective; - The attending physician and other staff will gather and document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide information and education to the resident or the resident's representative of the pneumococcal (any infection caused by bacteria called Streptococcus pneumoniae, or pneumococcus) and influenza (a contagious respiratory illness caused by influenza viruses that infect the nose, throat, and sometimes the lungs) vaccines, and offer the pneumococcal and influenza vaccines to four residents (Resident #2, #3, #18, and #22) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 35. Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults, revised on 09/22/23, showed the CDC recommends pneumococcal vaccination for adults [AGE] years old and older and adults 19 through [AGE] years old with certain underlying medical or risk conditions. Review of the United States Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults, dated 03/15/23, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 resident vaccinations were offered, administered, or refused by the resident and/or the resident representative for four residents (Residents #2, #3, #18, and #22) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 35. Review of the facility policy titled, COVID-19 Vaccination of Residents, revised June 2022, showed: - Residents eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine are strongly encouraged to do so; - Resident or representative has the right to accept, refuse, and change his/her decision about taking the COVID-19 vaccine; - Resident is provided with education regarding the benefits, risks, and potential side effects associated with the each vaccine and booster; - Residents are screened for contraindications to the vaccine; - Residents must sign a consent to vaccinate form prior to receiving the vaccine; - When COVID-19 vaccines are administered in two does, the second dose is automatically scheduled if first dose is received; - A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required annual competencies of dementia care (care of a resident with an impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions) or the abuse and neglect training and 12 hours of training for two Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) (CNA B and CNA C) out of two sampled CNAs, which had the potential to affect all residents. The facility's census was 35. The facility failed to provide a policy regarding the required annual nurse aide training. 1. Review of CNA B's in-service record showed: - A hire date of 03/30/20; - No documentation of the annual dementia care training provided for March 2022 through March 2023; - No documentation of 12 hours of training provided for March 2022 through March 2023. 2. Review of CNA C's in-service record showed: - A hire date of 12/12/22; - No documentation of the annual abuse and neglect training provided for December 2022 through December 2023; - No documentation of 12 hours of training provided for December 2022 through December 2023. During an interview on 01/11/24 at 1:20 P.M., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify one resident's (Resident #1) responsible party after the resident fell and sustained injuries on two separate occasions, one of which resulted in the resident going to the emergency room for evaluation. The facility census was 32. Review of the facility policy titled, Change in Resident's Condition or Status, revised on February 2021, showed the following: -The facility promptly notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition; -Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, a nurse will notify the resident's representative when: The resident is involved in an accident or incident that results in an injury including injuries of an unknown source; there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status; or it is necessary to transfer the resident to the hospital. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet showed the following:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
THE LICKING EXEMPT TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 05/24/2017
AGH1 LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/06/2025
BEAIRD, TODDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
BEDELL, DONALDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/24/2017
BEERS, JONATHANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
CAUDILL, TINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/15/2026
SCHMITT, LINDIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/27/2023
WARNER, ANGIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/16/2023
BEDELL, BRYANIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/12/2025
FG LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2017
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/16/2021
MID STATES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2017
THE CITY OF LICKINGOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2017
VAN DE VEN LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$847K
Related-party expense29% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 8%Other / private 20%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $847K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$227per resident / day
operating cost
$6,894per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$227per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265632. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next