No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avenir At Maple Grove

2407 Kentucky Street, Louisiana, MO 63353 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 90 certified beds · (573) 754-5456 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (573) 754-5456 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0741)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2023
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
211 S 3rd St · (573) 324-3203 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3308 Georgia St · (573) 754-4551 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3328 W Georgia St · (573) 754-6299 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(573) 754-4726 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2101 Georgia St · (573) 754-5278

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.2%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%5.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.2%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%4.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.7%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication35.9%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.5%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.5%17.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.8%23.5%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.7%63.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.9%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.2%13.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.862.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.642.331.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

25.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

25.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF25.1%CMS range 13.5–37.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 6.8–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 4.4–14.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.25
RN hours/ resident / day
0.94
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.99
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.18
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.13
RN hoursweekends
48.8%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 53.2 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-30)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-10)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Resident #1, and #2) of five sampled residents, received incontinence care in a timely manner to prevent odors and maintain hygiene. Staff failed to check or change residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with incontinent care for over four hours. The facility census was 52.Review of the facility policy Activities of Daily Living, dated 1/1/26, showed a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene.1. Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument, completed by the facility staff, dated 3/5/26, showed the following:-Diagnoses included heart failure, kidney disease and dementia;-Moderate cognitive impairment;-Always incontinent of bowel and bladder;-Dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and lower body dressing. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food items at a safe and appetizing temperature. Five residents (Resident #4, #3, #2, #1 and #5), of five sampled residents, reported staff served foods in the dining room and resident rooms that should be hot at service, cold. The issue had been reported repeatedly through the Resident Council with no resolution. The facility census was 58.Review of the facility policy, Food Safety Requirements, last reviewed/revised 09/25/23, showed the following: -It is the policy of this facility to procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory by federal, state and local authorities. Food will also be stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety; -Holding: staff shall monitor food temperatures while holding for delivery to ensure proper hot and cold holding temperatures are maintained. Staff shall refer to the current FDA Food Code; -Food and beverages shall be distributed and served to residents in a manner to prevent contamination and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-30 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Director had the appropriate competencies and skills set to carry out the function of the food and nutrition services. The facility census was 49. Review of the facility's undated job description for Director of Food Service/Dietary Manager Department, showed the following: -The Food Service Manager position is responsible for planning, organizing, developing, and directing the operations of the Dietary Department in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations and consistent with facility guidelines; -Functions with a moderate degree of independence and is evaluated on overall department performance based on resident satisfaction, employee performance, department safety, and department sanitation; -Directs and supervises production, preparation and service of resident meals; -Processes tray cards, ensure accuracy of physician orders, monitors tray assembly for compliance, diet accuracy and resident preferences; -Completes initial resident interviews, reviews and processes resident preferences;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, staff failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Staff did not practice proper hand hygiene or hair restraint usage. Staff did not ensure food items were labeled or dated and did not ensure dented cans of food were removed from use. Staff did not ensure the dishwashing machine water temperature gauge was functioning and the appropriate chemical sanitizer was being applied to dishes. Staff did not maintain surfaces and equipment to be free from a buildup of debris or ensure items were stored dry and in a sanitary manner. The facility census was 49. 1. Review of the facility's undated policy, Hand Washing Procedure, showed the following: -Turn on faucets and adjust water temperature for comfort; -Wet hands with water, spread a thin film of soap over entire skin surface, wash thoroughly using friction to all surfaces of hands, paying particular attention to fingernails and rings; -Add more water for additional suds if needed; -Rinse thoroughly under running water so that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-30 · tag F0887 — widespread
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all staff members were provided with written documentation of education regarding the benefits, risks and potential side effects associated with the COVID-19 vaccine and/or refusal of the vaccine. Further review showed the facility failed to maintain documentation related to staff COVID-19 vaccination status, whether received or declined. The facility census was 49. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) memo, QS0-25-14-NH, dated 03/10/25, showed the following: -The LTC facility must develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure all the following: -When COVID-19 vaccine is available to the facility, each staff member is offered the COVID-19 vaccine unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the staff member has already been immunized; -Before offering COVID-19 vaccine, all staff members are provided with education regarding the benefits and risks and potential side effects associated with the vaccine; -The facility maintains documentation related to staff COVID-19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the facility walls, ceilings, sink counter' and dining room/TV room chairs in good repair. The facility also failed to ensure the parking lot and driveway in front of the facility were free of damage and large potholes. The facility census was 49. Review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights, revised 05/04/22, showed the residents had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. 1. Observation on 04/29/25 at 8:12 A.M., in occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER], showed a laminated countertop surrounded the sink. An approximate 6 foot section of the counter was damaged where the particle board showed through the laminated surface. The surface was very rough and had uneven edges directly in front of the sink. Observation on 04/29/25 at 8:13 A.M. in occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER], showed the following: -An approximate 4 foot by 3 foot section of the wall, located under the sink, had multiple full length cracks. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update and revise the comprehensive care plan for three residents (Resident #9, #32 and #42) in a review of 19 sampled residents. The facility failed to update Resident #9's care plan to address continued risk for skin breakdown due to recent decline and decreased mobility, failed to update Resident #32's care plan to accurately reflect his/her care needs and failed to update Resident #42's care plan with intervention for wound care and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). The facility census was 49. Review of the facility policy, Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team, reviewed 01/2017, showed the following: -Policy: Every resident will be assessed using the Minimum Data Set (MDS) according to the guidelines set forth in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual; -Purpose: 1. To assess each resident's strengths, weaknesses, and care needs; 2. To use this assessment data to develop a comprehensive Plan of Care (POC) for each resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided three residents (Resident #6, #32 and #33 ), in a review of 19 sampled residents, that were unable to complete their own Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene and prevent body odor. The facility census was 49. A request was made for, but the facility did not provide, a policy for ADL care, including oral care. Review of the facility's policy, Urinary Continence and Incontinence - Assessment and Management, reviewed 01/2017, showed the following: -If the resident does not respond and does not try to toilet, or for those with severe cognitive impairment, staff will use a check and change strategy; -Check and change strategy involves checking the resident's continence status at regular intervals and using incontinence devices or garments. The primary goals are to maintain dignity and comfort and to protect the skin. -Notify the supervisor and/or medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were on duty per the facility assessment, to meet the residents' needs. The facility census was 49. Review of the facility policy, Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff, dated 08/25/23, showed the following: -It is the policy of the facility to provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident; -The facility's census, acuity and diagnoses of the resident population will be considered based on the facility assessment; -The facility will supply services by sufficient numbers of each of the following personnel types on a 24-hour basis to provide nursing care to all residents in accordance with resident care plans. Review of the facility policy, Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) (a system mandated by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for long-term care facilities to electronically submit staffing information) Staffing Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff served meals to meet the nutritional needs of the residents when staff did not prepare and serve food according to the facility's diet spreadsheet menu for two residents (Residents #17 and #7), in a review of 19 sampled residents, and did not serve the appropriate portion sizes to five residents (Residents #17, #4, #5, #9, #25 and #29). The facility census was 49. 1. Review of Resident #17's Physician Orders, dated April 2025, showed the following: -Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing); -An order for regular diet, mechanical soft texture, and double portions. Review of the facility's Diet Type Report, dated 04/25/25, showed the resident was to receive a mechanical soft diet and double portions. Review of the resident's Meal Card, showed no notes indicating the resident was to receive double portion. Observation on 04/27/25 at 12:38 P.M., during the noon meal, showed staff served the resident one serving of ground pork chop, one serving of mashed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff utilized Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) as required by facility policy when providing care and treatment to one resident (Resident #42), who had a wound, and also failed to ensure required signage was posted to indicate the use of EBP as required during high-contact personal care for two residents (Resident #42 and #33), in a review of three residents on EBP precautions. The facility failed to ensure staff performed proper hand hygiene when providing incontinence care to two residents (Resident #1 and #17), in a review of 19 sampled residents. The facility failed to implement their water management program to identify and reduce the risk of Legionella bacteria (cause of Legionnaire's disease - a severe form of pneumonia) growth and spread. The facility failed to track infections in the facility by organism and location. The facility census was 49. Review of the facility policy, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) that included a functional antibiotic stewardship program. In addition, the facility failed to ensure one additional resident (Resident #2), in a review of 19 sampled residents, had appropriate clinical indications for the use of an antibiotic The facility census was 49. Review of a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) undated document titled, The Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes showed the following: -Improving the use of antibiotics in healthcare to protect patients and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance is a national priority; -Antibiotic stewardship refers to a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use; -All nursing homes should take steps to improve antibiotic prescribing practices and reduce inappropriate use; -Nursing homes monitor both antibiotic use practices and outcomes related to antibiotics in order to guide practice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #8), in a review of 19 sampled residents, and one additional resident (Resident #28), the right to choose schedules (including waking times) and make choices about aspects of his/her life in the facility that were significant to the resident. The facility census was 49. Review of the facility policy, titled Resident Rights, revised 05/04/2022 showed the following: -The resident has the right to, and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice, including but not limited to: -a. The resident has the right to choose activities, schedules (including sleeping and waking times), assessments, and plan of care and other applicable provisions of this part; -b. The resident has the right to make choices about aspects of his/her life in the facility that are significant to the resident. 1. Review of Resident #8's Care Plan, revised 05/30/24, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument, completed by staff, according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual for two residents (Resident #17 and Resident #48), in a review of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 49. Review of the RAI Manual, dated October 2023, showed the following: -Medicare and Medicaid participating long-term care facilities are required to conduct comprehensive, accurate, standardized and reproducible assessments of each resident's functional capacity and health status; -The RAI process has multiple regulatory requirements. Federal regulations require that (1) the assessment accurately reflects the resident's status (2) a registered nurse conducts or coordinates each assessment with the appropriate participation of health professionals (3) the assessment process includes direct observation, as well as communication with the resident and direct care staff on all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice when staff failed to follow physician orders in providing continuous oxygen to one resident (Resident #49) to maintain the resident's oxygen needs, in a review of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 49. 1. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan, revised 01/15/25, showed the following: -He/She had oxygen therapy related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe); -Monitor for signs/symptoms of respiratory distress and report to physician as needed; -He/She has COPD/asthma; -Give oxygen therapy as ordered by the physician; -Monitor for difficulty breathing on exertion. Remind the resident not to push beyond endurance. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 04/21/25, showed the following: -Moderately impaired cognition; -Primary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently accommodate one resident's (Resident #31's) food preferences and failed to serve an appropriate food substitute/alternate. The facility census was 49. Review of the facility policy, Food Preparation Guidelines, dated 2023, showed the following: -Strategies to ensure residents satisfaction include honoring resident preferences, as possible, regarding food and drinks; -Staff shall accommodate resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, providing appropriate alternatives when needed; -Alternatives shall be appealing and of similar nutritive value to the food that is being substituted; -Alternatives shall be consistent with the usual and/or ordinary food items provided by the facility; -Staff should offer residents appropriate alternatives when they choose not to consume food/drink that is initially served or when a different food/drink choice is requested; -Resident preferences and allergies shall be obtained during the resident assessment process and added to the resident's dietary tray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Refer to Event ID UWJ112. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food items at a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility census was 48. Review of the facility policy for Food Safety Requirements, dated 9/25/23, showed: -Food will also be stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety; -When preparing food, staff shall take precautions in critical control points in the food preparation process to prevent, reduce or eliminate potential hazards: -Foods shall be prepared as directed until recommended temperatures of the specific foods are reached. Staff shall refer to the current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) food code and facility policy for food temperatures as needed; -Staff shall monitor food temperatures while holding for delivery to ensure proper got and cold holding temperatures are maintained. Staff shall refer to the current FDA food code; -Food and beverages shall be distributed and served to residents in a manner to prevent contamination and maintain food at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-10 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — widespread
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their responsible parties (RPs) were invited to participate in the care planning process for 2 (Resident #22 and Resident #29) of 2 residents sampled for care planning requirements. Staff interviews revealed the facility had not involved residents or their RPs in the care planning process since March of 2020. This affected all residents in the facility. Findings included: A review of the undated facility policy titled, Resident Participation - Care Conferences/Planning, revealed, Policy Statement The resident and his or her representative are encouraged to participate in the resident's assessment and in the development and implementation of the resident's care plan. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The resident and his or her legal representative are encouraged to attend and participate in the resident's assessment and in the development of the resident's person-centered care plan. The policy further indicated, 3. The resident/representative's right to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel record review, interviews, and facility document review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure 6 of 6 nurse aides (NAs) selected for review completed training to receive their certification within four months of their hire dates. Findings included: A review of an undated list of the facility's nurse aides (NAs) with hire dates, revealed the facility employed 11 NAs; six of the NAs were hired more than four months prior to the survey as indicated below: - NA #10, hire date of 02/28/2022 - NA #13, hire date of 12/10/2022 - NA #14, hire date of 04/18/2022 - NA #15, hire date of 12/05/2022 - NA #16, hire date of 08/10/2021 - NA #17, hire date of 01/18/2022 (tested in Illinois, but not in Missouri) A review of NA #10's personnel record revealed the record did not include any evidence indicating that NA #10 was certified or enrolled in a certified nurse aide (CNA) training program. A review of NA #13's personnel record revealed the record did not include any evidence indicating that NA #13 was certified or enrolled in a CNA training program. A review of NA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food items at a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility census was 48. Review of the facility policy for Food Safety Requirements, dated 9/25/23, showed: -Food will also be stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety; -When preparing food, staff shall take precautions in critical control points in the food preparation process to prevent, reduce or eliminate potential hazards: -Foods shall be prepared as directed until recommended temperatures of the specific foods are reached. Staff shall refer to the current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) food code and facility policy for food temperatures as needed; -Staff shall monitor food temperatures while holding for delivery to ensure proper got and cold holding temperatures are maintained. Staff shall refer to the current FDA food code; -Food and beverages shall be distributed and served to residents in a manner to prevent contamination and maintain food at the proper temperature and out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for 1 (Resident #4) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse prevention. Specially, the facility failed to prevent resident-to-resident abuse when they did not implement interventions immediately after the first indications of aggression. Findings included: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program, with a revision date of December 2016, revealed, Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to the freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. The policy indicated, As part of the resident abuse prevention, the administration will: 1. Protect our residents from abuse by anyone, including, but not necessarily limited to, facility staff, other residents,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the ombudsman in writing when a resident was transferred or discharged from the facility for 1 (Resident #254) of 3 residents reviewed for transfer and discharge. Specifically, the ombudsman was not notified regarding an emergency transfer to an acute care facility which was considered a facility-initiated transfer. Findings included: A review of an admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident #254 on 09/23/2020 and readmitted the resident on 08/23/2022 with a diagnosis that included transient cerebral ischemic attack. The admission Record indicated the resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned on 08/23/2022. During an interview on 08/10/2023 at 5:00 PM, the Social Services Director (SSD) stated notification to the ombudsman was not made when Resident #254 was discharged to the hospital. During an interview on 08/10/2023 at 5:35 PM, the Administrator indicated his expectation was to follow the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and document review, the facility failed to ensure that, in January 2023, there was a Director of Nursing (DON) on staff at the facility and failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was working eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. Findings included: Review of the facility's schedule, revised on 01/01/2023, revealed the facility did not have a DON in January of 2023. The schedule also revealed the facility had only one RN scheduled to work during the day shift, two days per week. Review of the facility's Daily Schedule for January 2023 revealed an RN did not work at the facility on 01/02/2023, 01/03/2023, 01/04/2023, 01/05/2023, 01/6/2023, 01/09/2023, 01/10/2023, 01/12/2023, or 01/13/2023. During an interview on 08/10/2023 at 1:42 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5 stated there had been days during her shift when the facility did not have an RN scheduled or working at the facility. LPN #5 noted she usually worked during the day shift but also covered night shifts. During an interview on 08/10/2023 at 5:56 PM, the DON stated she expected the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean environment in the laundry area. This affected 1 of 1 laundry room in the facility and was observed on 2 of 4 days of the survey. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Environmental Services - Waste - Laundry, from the Infection Control Manual 2019, revealed, Environmental Services 1. Environmental Services will develop protocols, including schedules for cleaning and decontamination of the work site. A tour of the laundry department on 08/08/2023 at 7:27 AM with Laundry Aide (LA) #1 revealed two large rugs in front of the washers that had numerous papers and lint debris. The floor area under the sink had dark discolorations with visible dust build-up and paper debris. During an interview on 08/08/2023 at 7:30 AM, LA #1 confirmed the floor under the sink was dirty. LA #1 said she did not know how often housekeeping staff cleaned the laundry area. During an interview on 08/08/2023 at 9:30 AM, the Housekeeping and Laundry Director stated laundry staff did their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the range hood baffles and the ovens were clean and free of debris, failed to store scoops outside the food containers; failed to ensure serving trays and plate covers were not put away wet; and failed to ensure kitchen staff had all their hair covered with hairnets. The facility census was 42. Observation on 12/17/19 between 10:48 A.M. and 12:27 P.M. in the kitchen showed the following: -The range hood baffle filters were covered with a thick layer of grease and debris; -The bottoms of both ovens had a thick layer of debris; -A scoop was stored in the sugar bin. The handle of the scoop touched the sugar; -The tray covers were stacked wet on the counter, and the serving trays used during the noon meal service were wet; -Dish Washer H, Dish Washer I, [NAME] K, the dietary manager, and Dietary Aide J were in the kitchen during meal preparation and did not ensure their hair was completely covered with a hair restraint. During interview on 12/17/19 at 1:11 P.M., the dietary manager said she expected the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-12-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain within an appropriate timeframe Nurse Aide (NA) registry/background screenings for two new employees, in a review of five newly hired employees prior to employment to determine if any had a Federal indicator with the nurse aide registry that would prohibit employment at the facility. The facility census was 51. 1. During interview on 12/20/19 at 1:00 P.M. the administrator said the facility did not have a policy regarding NA registry or background screenings. The facility should follow the state regulation requirements. Review of the facility's policy Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition and Policies and Procedures, revised 11/2018, showed the following: -The facility will not knowingly employ individuals who have been found guilty of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents or misappropriating their properties; -All employees will have criminal background checks, state, and federal required checks, employment reference checks (previous and current) and license/certification confirmation; -The facility will make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff provided two of 14 sampled residents (Resident #31 and #16) and two additional residents (Resident #15, and #40) that were unable to do their own Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene and prevent body odor. The facility census was 51. 1. During interview on 12/20/19 at 1:00 P.M. the administrator said the facility did not have a policy regarding providing ADL cares. Staff should follow the Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) manual and procedure learned in CNA training. Review of the facility's undated policy, Incontinence Care, showed the following: -Female: Cleanse lower abdomen, wiping from side to side, fold cloth over and cleanse remaining lower abdomen as above; Cleanse on side of inner leg surface with a downward stroke and place cloth in bag when all four sides are used. Repeat on other side. Cleanse labia using downward stroke. Use a new side of wash cloth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-12-20 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — pattern
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff on the behavioral unit, to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by the resident assessments and individual plans of care for four of 14 sampled residents (Resident #25, Resident #31, Resident #4 and Resident #14), and for one additional resident (Resident #18) out of eight residents who resided on the facility's special care unit (SCU). The facility census was 51. 1. During interview on 12/20/19 at 1:00 P.M. the administrator said the facility did not have a policy regarding staffing on the SCU. 2. Review of Resident #18's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment instrument, completed by facility staff, dated 10/23/19 showed the following: -Cognitively intact; -Independent in walking in room and corridor; -Independent in locomotion on and off the unit; -Independent in Activities of Daily Living (ADLs);…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility census was 42. Review of the facility's policy for meal service temperatures, dated January 2019, showed temperatures of hot food shall be supported to promote service temperatures of hot food to about 120 degrees. Record review on 12/17/19 of the noon meal menu showed beef ravioli, marinara sauce, mixed vegetables, garlic bread stick, and pudding. Observation on 12/17/19 between 12:06 P.M. and 12:55 P.M. of the noon meal service showed staff prepared and served all residents the lunch meal. Observation on 12/17/19 at 12:55 P.M., of the test tray received after the last resident was served, showed the following food tempertures: -The ravioli was 98 degrees F; -The pureed ravioli was 112 degrees Farenheit (F); -The mixed vegetables were 97 degress F. -The pureed vegetables were 100 degrees F; The food was cool to taste. During interview on 12/17/19 at 1:11 P.M., the dietary manager said at the time of service, the food should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff washed their hands after each direct resident contact and when indicated by professional standard of practice during personal care for five residents (Resident #30, #16, #37, #13 and #48) in a sample of 14 residents and one additional resident (Resident #15) and failed to maintain and implement a comprehensive infection control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of water-borne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease) and failed to provide documented assessments for such an outbreak. The facility census was 51. 1. Review of the facility policy Infection Prevention and Control Manual, dated 2019 showed the following: Appropriate hand hygiene is essential in preventing transmission of infectious agents. Definitions: Hand Hygiene (HH), Alcohol Based Hand Rub (ABHR), visibly soiled hands (hands are showing visible dirt or visibly contaminated with blood, fecal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for two residents (Residents #42 and #46), in a review of 13 sampled residents. Staff failed to obtain ordered medications including Xarelto (a blood thinning medication) and Acyclovir (treatment for herpes virus, shingles) for Resident #42, and failed to obtain ordered medications including Primidone (a seizure preventing medication) and Seroquel 25mg (an antipsychotic used for depression) for Resident #46. The facility census was 51. 1. During interview on 12/20/19 at 1:00 P.M. the administrator said the facility did not have a policy regarding following physician's orders. Review of the facility policy Medication Ordering and Receiving from the Pharmacy, dated June 1, 2018, showed the following: -Emergency pharmacy service is available on a 24-hour basis; -Telephone/fax numbers for emergency pharmacy service are posted at nursing stations; -The dispensing pharmacy supplies emergency or stat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-12-20 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct and develop a detailed facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for the residents competently during both day-to-day operations and during emergencies. The facility census was 51. 1. During interview on 12/20/19 at 1:00 P.M. the administrator said the facility did not have a policy regarding the facility assessment. Review of the facility assessment dated [DATE] showed a standardized assessment tool with suggestions for completion. The assessment did not contain the following: -Any ethnic, cultural, or religious factors with potential to affect the care provided by the facility; -Other pertinent facts or descriptions of the resident population that must be taken into account when determining staffing and resource needs; -Policies and procedures for provision of care; -Plan for working with medical practitioners; -Physical environment and building/plant needs to ensure adequate supplies and equipment maintained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MAPLE GROVE HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/01/2025
BY FAMILY 2012 IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WAGNER, BEZALELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WAGNER, YITZCHOKIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
JACOBOVITCH, YOSSIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
LAPCIUC, AVRAHAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
SAN, MANUELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WEID, AMELITAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
YOWELL, DAKOTAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
DELTA EDGE STRATEGIC ADVISORSOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
HHHH VENTURES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
KRPSS PARTNERSOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
MG REALTY HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
NBH2 MGPROPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
FELHEIM, YITCHOKIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$235K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 4%Other / private 34%

This home reported $235K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$236per resident / day
operating cost
$7,159per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$224per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265740. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next