Loch Haven

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 71.5 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.86 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately monitor one resident's (Resident #1's) monitoring device (a small wristwatch-sized device (Tag) worn by a resident or attached to an asset (wheelchair, walker) that will trigger an alarm if in close proximity of an activation field; usually an exit door), per the manufacturer's instructions to ensure it functioned appropriately and would alert staff if the resident attempted to leave the facility without staff knowledge, in a review of 14 sampled residents. The resident was assessed as at risk for elopement and utilized a monitoring device as an intervention to address that risk. On 3/2/24 at 7:24 A.M., the resident exited the facility through the main entrance without staff knowledge in his/her motorized wheelchair. The monitoring device alarm system did not function and alarm when the resident exited the facility. The resident traveled approximately one half mile, on a paved road with no shoulder or side walk, before a concerned citizen saw the resident and contacted 911 and the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #2), in a review of seven sampled residents, received the necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice when the facility failed to assess and report Resident #2's complaint of right eye pain, redness, watering, and blurry and dim vision timely. The resident was involved in a physical altercation with Resident #1 on 02/10/25, where both resided on the facility's Special Care Unit (SCU - dementia care unit). Resident #2 reported to family and staff in the days following that his/her eye hurt. Multiple staff in the SCU, including Certified Medication Technicians (CMT) and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), reported to licensed staff (nurses that worked off SCU unit and were to go to that unit to assess any reported issue), the resident's complaints and concern with his/her right eye. Licensed staff failed to come to the unit to assess the resident's eye concerns reported by unit staff.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify the root cause of an altercation involving two residents (Residents #1 and #2), who had a diagnosis of dementia, in a review of seven sampled residents, following a physical altercation on 8/12/25, failed to effectively communicate the altercation to staff, and failed to develop individualized interventions to address the root cause and to prevent further incidents. On 8/15/25, Resident #2 approached Resident #1, in the same manner he/she did on 8/12/25, and knocked Resident #1 down with his/her walker. The facility census was 73. During an interview on 8/21/25 at 11:04 A.M., the Administrator said the following:-The facility did not have a policy for dementia care;-The facility did not have a policy for resident-to-resident altercations;-The facility had a policy for Wandering, but it was only specific to elopement risk and the functioning of Wanderguards (electronic monitoring devices). 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet showed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Staff did not securely seal, label, date, or store food items per manufacturer's instructions. Staff did not practice proper hand and glove hygiene, hair restraint usage, and consumption of personal food items. Staff did not maintain surfaces and equipment to be free from a buildup of grease and debris and did not ensure surfaces were sanitized properly. Staff did not ensure dishes and utensils were stored and handled in a sanitary manner. The facility census was 73. 1. Review of the facility policy, Food Storage (Dry, Refrigerator, and Frozen), dated 2020, showed the following:-Food shall be stored on shelves in a clean, dry area free from contaminants;-Food should be stored at appropriate temperatures and using appropriate methods to ensure the highest level of food safety;-All food items will be labeled. The label must include the name of the food and the date by which it should be sold, consumed, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that enhanced residents' dignity and ensured full recognition of individuality for one resident (Resident #72), in a review of 18 sampled residents, and three additional residents (Residents #26, #32 and #57). The facility census was 72. Review of the facility policy, Assistance with Meals, revised March 2022, showed the following:-Residents shall receive assistance with meals in a manner that meets the individual needs of each resident;-Facility staff will serve resident trays and will help residents who require assistance with eating;-Residents who cannot feed themselves will be fed with attention to safety, comfort, and dignity, - Do not stand over residents while assisting them with meals. 1. Review of Resident #26's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 05/22/25, showed the following:-Severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Residents # 27 and #72), in a review of 18 sampled residents, and one additional resident (Resident #26), were provided the right to choose schedules (including waking times) and make choices about aspects of their lives in the facility that were significant to the residents. The facility census was 72. Review of the facility policy, Quality of Life-Dignity, revised February 2020, showed the following:-Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his/her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, feeling of self-worth and self-esteem;-Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times;-The facility culture is one that supports and encourages humanization and individuation of residents and honors resident choices, preferences, values and beliefs. This begins with the initial admission and continues throughout the resident's facility stay;-Some examples of ways in which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-11 · tag F0640 — pattern
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility staff) in a timely manner and in accordance with guidelines for one resident (Resident #18) in a review of 18 sampled residents and five additional residents (Resident #15, #25, #30, #32 and #36). The facility's census was 72. The facility did not provide a policy for MDS assessment and transmission upon request. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) version 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, dated October 2024, showed the following: -For all non-admission assessments, the MDS completion date must be no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD); -For the admission assessment, the MDS Completion Date must be no later than 13 days after the entry date;-Encoding Data: Within 7 days after completing a resident's MDS assessment or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for two residents (Resident #2 and Resident #72) in a review of 18 sampled residents, to reflect the resident's specific condition and/or needs. The facility census was 72. Review of the facility policy, Goals and Objectives, Care Plans, revised 2009, showed the following: -Care plans shall incorporate goals and objectives that lead to the resident's highest obtainable level of independence; -Care plan goals and objectives are derived from information contained in the resident's comprehensive assessment and: -Are resident oriented; -Goals and objectives are entered on the resident's care plan so that all disciplines have access to such information and can report whether the desired outcomes are being achieved; -Goals and objectives are reviewed and/or revised when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition and at least quarterly.;-The policy did not define expectations for review and revision of care plans. 1. Review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure chemicals were secured in a locked storage area and not accessible to residents. The facility failed to ensure the electric range, located in the north activity room was disabled when not in use and staff were not present. The facility census was 72. 1. Review of Resident #62's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 06/17/25, showed the following: -Cognitively impaired; -Diagnosis of non-Alzheimer's dementia (a group of conditions causing cognitive decline, impacting memory, thinking and behavior, that are not due to Alzheimer's disease). Observation on 08/06/25 at 4:10 A.M. on the 400 hall showed the following:-The shower room door was unlocked and accessible to residents;-No staff was present in the area;-Resident #62 walked up and down the hallway; -Two bottles of Lysol disinfectant cleaner sat on the floor by the toilet. The label read, Warning: Causes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week and failed to ensure the Director of Nursing (DON) worked as a charge nurse only when the facility had a census of 60 or less. The facility census was 72. 1. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 07/09/25 showed the following:-Average daily census: 70;Staff included one Registered Nurse, Director of Nurses full time on days, an Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) full time on days, and an RN or Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), two for the day shift and one for night shift. 2.Review of the Licensed Nurse Schedule, dated January 2025, showed no hours of RN coverage for 01/01/25. Review of the Licensed Nurse Schedule, dated 01/07/25, showed no hours of RN coverage scheduled. Review of RN R's timecard, dated 01/07/25, showed he/she worked six hours and 45 minutes (did not fulfill the eight-hour requirement). 3.Review of the Census Activity Report, dated 01/11/25, showed the facility census was 68. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-11 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a performance review of each nurse aide at least once every 12 months and provide regular in-service education based upon the outcome of the reviews. The facility census was 72. The facility did not provide a policy for annual performance reviews. 1.Review of a list of current staff, dated 08/05/25 showed the following:-Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) I: Date of hire 04/15/09;-CNA J: Date of hire 07/03/23;-CNA H: Date of hire 07/04/07;-CNA B: Date of hire 10/20/22;-CNA L: Date of hire 02/10/11. Record review showed no documentation of nurse aide evaluations or annual performance reviews for CNA B, CNA H, CNA I, CNA J or CNA L. During an interview on 08/11/25 at 6:04 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the following:-Nurse aide evaluations/annual performance reviews had not been completed for a while;-If there were complaints regarding staff performance or skills, the Registered Nurse (RN) Consultant proved additional training to that staff member. During an interview on 08/11/25 at 6:30 P.M. the Administrator said…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature. The facility census was 73. Record review of the facility policy, Serving Temperatures for Hot and Cold Foods, revised 2020, showed the following: -Food will be served at the following temperatures to ensure a safe and appetizing dining experience: -Vegetables - 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 170 degrees F; -Fruits, desserts, and dairy products - 41 degrees F or below; -The cook will take temperatures of hot and cold food items using approved food thermometers prior to each meal service. Food temperatures will be recorded. 1. Review of food temperature logs, located in the kitchen, for all meals (breakfast, lunch, dinner) for 8/1/25, 8/2/25, and 8/3/25 were blank. 2. Review of the Diet Orders, printed 8/4/25, showed the following: -57 residents with a physician-ordered regular diet; -Nine residents with a physician-ordered mechanical soft diet; -Five residents with a physician-ordered pureed diet; -Two residents with a physician-ordered finger foods diet. 3.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$77,841 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $69,820 — penalty dated 2025-03-07
• $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-03-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO