No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ozarks Methodist Manor, The

205 South College,, Marionville, MO 65705 · Non profit - Corporation · 78 certified beds · (417) 258-2573 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (417) 258-2573 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Apr 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Apr 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
721 E Highland St · (417) 308-2278 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
201 US-60 · (417) 258-2526 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
646 S Highway 60 · (417) 258-5644 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.3%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight18.0%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.8%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.7%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%18.5%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained2.6%0.0%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.0%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.8%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication38.5%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.3%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control33.9%17.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table31.4%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication7.0%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine30.0%63.5%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.362.111.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.522.331.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

12.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.8%CMS range 8.8–17.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.121.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.34
RN hours/ resident / day
0.54
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.29
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.17
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
45.8%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 59.3 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-09)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2023-05-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-01-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify weight loss and poor intake and failed to implement interventions to aid in the prevention of weight loss for one resident (Resident #14) who had severe weight loss of 9.60% in one month and for one resident (Resident #228) who had weight loss of 19.38% in five months. Three residents were reviewed for weight loss in a facility with a census of 58. Review of the facility policy titled Nutrition (Impaired)/Unplanned Weight Loss-Clinical Protocol, revised 09/17, showed staff should report significant weight loss, abrupt change in appetite and food intake to the physician. Review of the facility policy titled Nutrition Assessment, revised 10/17, showed the Registered Dietitian (RD), in conjunction with nursing staff and other healthcare practitioners, would conduct a nutritional assessment for each resident as indicated by a change in condition that places the resident at risk for nutritional impairment. Review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of possible abuse were reported immediately to management and within two hours to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) when staff witnessed possible abuse involving one resident (Resident #1) and failed to report the allegation in a timely fashion. The facility census was 59.Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property, undated, showed the following:-It is the policy of the facility that each resident will be free from abuse;-Abuse can include verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse;-All allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, injuries of unknown source will be reported immediately, but no later than two hours (abuse) and 24 hours (non-abuse);-All facility employees are mandated reporters;1. Review of Resident #1 face sheet (admission data) showed the following:-admission date 10/09/23;-Diagnoses include Alzheimer's disease (neurological disease affection memory and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation when one resident (Resident #1) had $40 taken from his/her wallet in his/her room at the facility without the resident's knowledge or consent. The facility had a census of 60. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Policy/Elder Justice Act, revised 01/16/19, showed misappropriation of resident property included the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of the resident's belongings, or money without the resident's consent. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (basic information sheet) showed the following: -admission date of 09/18/18; -Diagnoses included mild cognitive impairment, general anxiety disorder (excessive worry and fear that interfere with daily life), major depressive disorder (persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities, and other symptoms that affect daily life), traumatic brain injury, presence of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-09 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to consistently use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week between 07/04/24 and 12/30/24. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 58 residents residing in the facility. 1. Review of the facility's Staffing Sheets, provided by the Human Resources Director (HR Director), dated 07/04/24 through 12/30/24, showed there was no RN coverage on the following dates: -On 07/04/24; -On 07/06/24; -On 07/07/24; -On 07/31/24; -On 08/01/24; -On 09/02/24; -On 12/23/24; -On 12/30/24. During an interview on 01/09/25, at 11:30 A.M., Central Supply (CS) and the HR Director confirmed that the facility had more licensed practical nurses than registered nurses and that there were days that the facility had not been able to schedule a registered nurse to work at the facility for at least eight hours a day. During an interview on 01/09/25, at 5:22 P.M., the Director of Nursing confirmed that there had been RN coverage issues, and that the facility was struggling to get…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manger met the required training, certification, and/or experience This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 58 residents who received meals in the facility. Review of the facility's Director of Food and Beverage Services, updated 07/14, showed the position required certification as required by state regulations. 1. During an interview on 01/06/24, at 2:37 P.M., the Dietary Manager (DM) said she had been employed at the facility for two years. She was not certified and did not have any Serv-Safe courses. She had been enrolled in classes since 2023, but had not been able to complete the courses. During an interview on 01/09/24, at 11:31 A.M., the Registered Dietitian (RD) said she was aware the DM was not certified. She is in the facility two days a month for approximately 16 hours and spends most of her time precepting the DM in her courses, but she has had a hard time finishing them.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct an annual review of its Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) and update their program, as necessary, including revision of the IPCP as national standards changed. The failure had the potential to increase the risk of adverse events, including the development of antibiotic-resistant organisms, from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use for all 58 facility residents. Review of the facility policy titled Infectious Disease Threat Communications Plan, revised April 2019, showed The Infectious Disease Threat Communications Plan was reviewed and updated at least annually. 1. Review of a binder provided by the facility titled Infection Prevention showed the following: -The binder appeared disorganized and had policy pages out of order or missing pages. The content of one page did not match the content of the following page. -The binder included a policy titled COVID-19 Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean homelike environment for all residents when the bathroom exhaust fan vents of seven residents (Resident #281, #280, #76, #5, #279, #22, and #11) were kept clean. Review of the facility policy titled, Job Duties, Housekeeper (South Hall), dated 10/22/24, showed weekly duties included to dust all vents in rooms and bathrooms. 1. Observation on 01/06/25, at 3:10 P.M., showed the exhaust vent in the shared bathroom of Resident #281, Resident #280, and Resident #76 was covered in a layer of fuzzy, gray dust, dirt, and debris. Observation on 01/06/25, at 3:28 P.M., showed the exhaust vent in the shared bathroom of Resident #5, Resident #279, and Resident #22 was covered in a layer of fuzzy, gray dust, dirt, and debris. Observation on 01/06/25, at 4:38 P.M., the exhaust vent in the private bathroom of Resident #11 was covered in a layer of stringy cobweb-like fibers and fuzzy gray dirt, dust, and debris. During concurrent observations and interviews on 01/09/25, beginning at 1:43 PM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure completed Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff) assessments were sent to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) system with required time frames days after completion for four residents (Resident #11, #19, #15, and #1) out 21 sampled residents reviewed for MDS transmission. Review of the facility's policy titled Nursing Services Policy and Procedure Manual for Long-Term Care - Assessments and Care Planning, dated July 2017, showed it did not address transmission of MDS data to the CMS system. Review of the CMS 2024 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, accessed at https://www.cms.gov/files/document/finalmds-30-rai-manual-v1191october2024.pdf on 01/09/24, showed the following: -Encoding Data: Within 7 days after completing a resident's MDS assessment or tracking record, the provider must encode the MDS data (i.e., enter the information into the facility MDS software). The encoding requirements are as follows: -For a comprehensive assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan directing measurable goals and interventions for three residents (Resident #231, #11, and #10) of a total sample of 21 residents. 1. Review of the facility's Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring policy, revised March 2019, showed the care plan will incorporate findings from the comprehensive assessment and Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II determinations (as appropriate), and be consistent with current standards of practice. Review of Resident #231's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the EMR, showed the following: -admission date of 10/28/19; -Diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia (a type of schizophrenia accompanied by paranoia. Delusions and hallucinations are the two symptoms), bipolar (a mental illness that causes clear shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration), major depressive disorder, intellectual disability, and anxiety. Review of the resident's PASARR/ID (Pre-admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan directing measurable goals and interventions for six residents (Resident (R) 19, R228, R231, R11, R10, and R14) of a total sample of 21 residents. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and the inability to meet their maximum practicable level of functioning. Findings include: 3. Review of R231's admission Record located in the Profile tab of the EMR revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar, major depressive disorder, intellectual disability, and anxiety. Review of R231's PASRR/ID [Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review/Intellectual Disability] Client Data/Determination Sheet located in the Misc tab of the EMR, and dated 10/21/19, revealed R231 met the federal definition of Intellectual Disability/Related Condition (ID/RC) but did not require specialized services. Please incorporate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated with dignity/respect at all times when staff failed to serve residents sitting at the same table consecutively during meal service resulting in one resident (Resident #233) sitting without a meal while tablemates ate. Review of the facility's policy titled Dining Room Dignity Service Policy, undated, showed meals would be provided to all residents sitting at the table at the same time. 1. Observation of a meal on 01/06/24, at 5:25 P.M., showed four residents sat at the same table. Three of the residents were served their meal at 5:25 P.M The fourth resident, Resident #233, was not served his/her meal. Staff served the surrounding tables their meals without noticing the resident did not have a meal. The resident was observed raising his/her hand to get staff's attention. No staff responded to the resident's raised hand. The staff noticed the resident's raised hand at 5:43 P.M., and served him/her a meal. During an interview on 01/06/24, at 5:43 P.M., the resident said he/she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment within 14 days of the significant change when facility staff did not complete the assessment for one resident (Resident #228) after being admitted to hospice services. A sample of 21 residents were reviewed. Review of the facility's Resident Assessment Instrument policy, revised September 2010, showed the assessment coordinator is responsible for ensuring that the interdisciplinary assessment team conduct timely resident assessments and reviews when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition. 1. Review of Resident #228's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) showed the following: -admission date of 07/29/22; -Diagnoses included hypertensive (high blood pressure) heart disease, diabetes, and myocardial infarction (heart attack). Review of the resident's Census tab showed there resident began on hospice care on 11/20/24. Review of the resident's Social Services Note, dated 11/20/24, and located in the Prog Notes tab of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer care per standards of practice when staff failed to document full and accurate assessments of a pressure ulcer and failed to care plan the pressure ulcer and interventions in place to prevent and/or treat pressure ulcers for one resident (Resident # 19), for three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, in a total sample of 21 residents reviewed. Review of the facility's Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown - Clinical Protocol policy, revised April 2018, showed the following: -During resident visits, the physician will evaluate and document the progress of wound healing, especially for those with complicated, extensive, or poorly-healing wounds. -The physician will guide the care plan as appropriate, especially when wounds are not healing as anticipated or new wounds develop despite existing interventions. -Current approaches should be reviewed for whether they remain pertinent to the resident/patient's medical conditions, are affected by factors influencing wound development or healing, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records were complete and accurately documented when the facility failed to ensure physician progress notes were documented and available for review in the electronic medical record (EMR) for one resident (Resident #133), reviewed out of a total sample of 21 residents. 1. Review of Resident #133's Face Sheet, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), showed the following: -admission date of 06/19/23; -Diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease (thickening or hardening of the arteries), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a condition caused by damage to the airways or other parts of the lung), low-tension glaucoma (a group of eye diseases that can cause vision loss and blindness by damaging a nerve in the back of your eye called the optic nerve), and osteoporosis (a bone disease that develops when bone mineral density and bone mass decreases, or when the quality or structure of bone changes). Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to conduct ongoing review for antibiotic stewardship for one resident (Resident #15), of three residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship, who received multiple antibiotics over multiple months. Review of the facility's policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship, revised December 2016, showed antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. Review of the facility's policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship - Review and Surveillance of Antibiotic Use and Outcomes, revised December 2016, showed the following: -All clinical infections treated with antibiotics will undergo review by the infection preventionist (IP), or designee; -The IP, or designee, will review antibiotic utilization as part of the antibiotic stewardship program and identify specific situations that are not consistent with the appropriate use of antibiotics; -All resident antibiotic regimens will be documented on the facility-approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to employ a qualified dietary manager for food and nutrition services when the dietitian was not employed full-time by the facility. The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's policy titled Director of Food and Beverage Services, revised 07/2014, showed the following: -The Director of Food and Beverage Services is responsible for the overall effective dietary services; selecting, training and supervision all dietary services personnel; procuring supplies and equipment; assisting with budget preparation and operating within budgetary guidelines. (The policy did not address the requirements of being a Certified Dietary Manager, Certified in Food Services Manager, or education/training related to service management or hospitality.) 1. During an interview on 05/15/23, at 9:00 A.M., the Dietary Manager (DM) said the following: -He/she was not a Certified Dietary Manager and not enrolled in a training/certification course; -He/she was not a Certified Food Services Manager and did not have an associate's degree or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards of practice and protect all food from possible contamination when the facility staff failed to ensure foods were held at an appropriate temperature to inhibit the growth of pathogens that can cause foodborne illness; staff failed to discard dented cans when staff stored dented cans on the shelves along with cans of food staff used to prepare resident food; staff failed to discard expired food stored on the shelves along with food used to prepare resident food; staff failed to clean the floor in the dry storage rooms, dishwashing and food preparation area, refrigerators and freezers that stored food used to prepare resident food; staff failed to wear hairnets appropriately while preparing resident's food; staff failed to use proper hand washing and glove use while preparing residents food; and staff failed to regularly test the sanitation levels of the dishwashing machines. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the Food and Drug Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-18 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to dispose of empty card board boxes in the kitchen area on the north hall to prevent the harboring of pests. The facility census was 59. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to cleaning or refuse disposal. 1. Observation on 05/15/23, at 8:52 A.M., showed in the kitchen area on the north hall, an empty box of oatmeal cream pies laid on the floor on the right side of the washing sink and behind the trash can. Observation on 05/16/23, at 7:50 A.M., showed the following: -One empty box with used gloves, cellophane, and pieces of cardboard laid on the floor in front of the hand washing sink; -Two empty oatmeal cream pie boxes laid on the floor on the right side of the hand washing sink behind the trash can. -In the dry storage area, two empty cardboard boxes laid on the floor in front of the wire shelving on the west side and eleven empty soda flats sat on the top shelf of the wire shelving on the west side. Observation on 05/17/23, at 7:39 A.M., showed the following: -In the dry storage area,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program when dead and live roaches and brown beetles were observed on the floors in the main kitchen, kitchen on the north hall, and in a freezer in the kitchen on the north hall. The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's Pest Control Policy, undated, showed the following: -The pest control company agrees to furnish regularly scheduled monthly services. Each service can normally be performed during normal working hours on a set date. Each service trip our technician will check with the responsible person and leave an invoice indicating the day they were there, materials used, and any activity noted; -Emergency Maintenance, can call back at no additional cost, will be available for covered pest and services if service is provided monthly. The policy is to initiate corrective measures within 24 hours from notification. When possible, this will be sooner; -The intention in servicing your operation will be to establish a preventative maintenance service; -Covered pests include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-18 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #1) code status (the level of medical interventions a resident wishes to have if their heart or breathing stops) was signed by a person capable of making an informed decision for the resident, failed to ensure a code status form was signed by the resident for one resident (Resident #17), and failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #212) had a code status present in the medical record A sample of four residents was selected for review out of a facility census of 59. Review of the facility's policy titled, Advanced Directives (written instruction such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care (DPOA - a person established to make health care decisions if a person is unable to make their own), relating to the provisions of health care when the individual is incapacitated (unable to care for self or affairs)), dated [DATE], showed the following: -The facility will respect advance directives in accordance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state licensing agency (Department of Health and Senior Services- DHSS) within the required time frame when one resident (Resident #48) alleged staff were assaulting him/her. A sample of two residents was selected in a facility with a census of 59. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised 04/2021, showed residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes, but is not limited to, freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. ReviewofthefacilityspolicytitledAbuse Neglect ExploitationorMisappropriation- ReportingandInvestigating, revised09/2022, showedthefollowing -Ifaresidentabuse neglect exploitation misappropriationofresidentpropertyorinjuryofunknownsourceissuspected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an investigation of an allegation of abuse when one resident (Resident #48) alleged staff assaulted him/her A sample of two residents was selected in a facility with a census of 59. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised 04/2021, showed the following: -Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, revised 09/2022, showed the following: -All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify, develop, implement, and care plan new interventions in attempt to prevent falls for one resident (Resident #23) who had a decline in his/her function resulting in multiple falls. A sample of three residents were reviewed in a facility with a census of 59. Record review of the facility's Fall - Clinical Protocol Policy, revised March 2018, showed the following information: -Staff will evaluate and document falls that occur while the individual is in the facility including when and where they happen and any observations of the events;. -Falls should be categorized as: those that occur while trying to rise from a sitting or lying to an upright position; those that occur while upright and attempting to ambulate; and other circumstances such as sliding out of a chair or rolling from a low bed to floor; -For an individual who has fallen, the staff and practitioner will begin to try to identify possible causes within 24 hours of the fall. Often multiple factors contribute to a falling problem; -If the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #10) who had a history of chronic (recurring) urinary tract infections (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system) received timely treatment and care after the resident voiced symptoms of a urinary tract in a sample of three residents. The facility census was 59 residents. Record review of the facility's Lab and Diagnostic Test Results-Clinical Protocol, revised November 2018, showed the following information: -The physician will identify and order diagnostic and lab testing based on the resident's diagnostic and monitoring needs; -The staff will process test requisitions and arrange for tests; -The laboratory, diagnostic radiology provider, or other testing source will report test results to the facility; -When test results are reported to the facility, a nurse will first review results; -If staff who first receive or review lab and diagnostic test results cannot follow the remainder of this procedure for reporting and documenting the results and their implications,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's received behavioral health services to maintain the highest practical psychosocial well-being when the facility failed to care plan and implement resident specific interventions for and failed to have social services follow-up with one resident (Resident #32) who had a history of depression and had expressed signs of possible depression. A sample of three residents were reviewed in a facility with a census of 59. 1. Review of Resident #32's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. Review of the resident's social services initial note, dated [DATE], showed the resident was widowed and lived alone prior to entering the facility. The resident received Lexapro (a antidepressant) for depression prior to his/her admission. Review of the resident's care plan,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to adequately equipped with a full call light system when call light pull cords in two residents' (Resident #23 and Resident #10) rooms were too short where residents not always easily access the pull cord for staff assistance. The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Call System, dated September 2022, showed the following: -Residents are provided with a means to call staff for assistance through a communication system that directly calls a staff member or a centralized work station; -Each resident is provided with a means to call staff directly for assistance from his/her bed, from toileting/bathing facilities and from the floor; -The resident call system is routinely maintained and tested by the maintenance department. 1. Observation on 05/18/23, at 8:23 A.M., of Resident #23's room, showed the call light pull cord in the resident's bathroom next to the toilet was not long enough to reach the floor. During an interview on 05/18/23, at 10:30 A.M., the resident said restorative staff work with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-23 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the prior survey results were posted in a readily accessible public location for residents, family members, and residents' legal representatives. The facility census was 60. 1. Observation on 1/21/20 at 2:00 P.M., showed several binders, including the binder containing the 4/7/18 annual survey results, placed on a shelf located above a small table, near the South nurses' station. The binder, containing the survey results, would not be easily accessible to residents, or anyone else, in a wheelchair or who had difficulty walking, without asking for assistance. During an interview on 1/21/20 at 2:10 P.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A said the survey results should be at the nurses' desk but he/she did not know the exact location of the survey results book. An interview and observation on 1/21/20 at 2:12 P.M., showed the following: -The Director of Nursing (DON) said she thought the past survey results were located at the nurses' station. -The DON looked through the various binders placed on the shelf near the South…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-23 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) assessments were completed within the required timeframe for three residents (Resident #7, Resident #11, and Resident #15) out of a sample of 18 residents. The facility census was 60. Record review of the facility policy, titled Electronic Transmission of the MDS from the Nursing Services Policy and Procedure Manual for Long-Term Care, dated 2001 and revised September 2010, showed the following information: -All MDS assessments (e.g., admission, annual, significant change, quarterly review, etc.) and discharge and reentry records will be completed and electronically encoded into the facility's MDS information system and transmitted to Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services' (CMS) Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) System in accordance with current OBRA regulations governing the transmission of MDS data. -All staff members responsible for completion of the MDS receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-23 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically transmit encoded data Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, assessments from the facility to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system within 14 days on one resident (Resident #3) out of a sample of 18 residents selected for review. The facility had a census of 60 residents. Record review of the facility policy, titled Electronic Transmission of the MDS from the Nursing Services Policy and Procedure Manual for Long-Term Care, dated 2001 and revised September 2010, showed the following information: -All MDS assessments (e.g., admission, annual, significant change, quarterly review, etc.) and discharge and reentry records will be completed and electronically encoded into the facility's MDS information system and transmitted to Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services' (CMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-23 · tag F0642 — pattern
    Ensure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse certified the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, completion date (Z0500B) no later than 14 days after the assessment reference date (ARD - A2300) for three residents (Resident #3, Resident #5, and Resident #12). The facility census was 60. Record review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, dated 10/1/17, showed the following: -Z0500B description: MDS Completion Date - date of the RN assessment coordinator's signature, indicating that the MDS is complete; -In accordance with the requirements at 42 CFR 483.20(f)(1), (f)(2), and (f)(3), long-term care facilities participating in the Medicare and Medicaid programs must meet the following conditions: -For all non-admission Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 (OBRA) and Prospective Payment System (PPS) assessments, the MDS Completion Date (Z0500B) must be no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) (A2300). 1. Record review of Resident #3's MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-23 · tag F0923 — pattern
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the residents' bathroom exhaust ventilation system in proper working condition when 23 residents' bathrooms did not have functioning exhaust vents. The facility had a census of 60. 1. Observation on 01/23/2020, beginning at 8:30 A.M., showed the exhaust ventilation system in the following rooms did not work when tested: -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]; -room [ROOM NUMBER]. During an interview on 01/23/2020, at approximately 1:15 P.M., the maintenance supervisor (MS) said he did not know the residents' bathroom exhaust system…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to document monitoring of antibiotic use for one resident (Resident #39) with a urinary tract infection. A sample of 18 residents were selected for review in a facility with a census of 60. Record review of the facility's policy titled Infections-Clinical Protocol, revised March 2018, showed the following: -The nursing staff and physician or provider will monitor the progress of a resident with an infection until it is resolved. 1. Record review of Resident #39's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff), dated 11/8/19, showed the following: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Moderately impaired cognition; -Required supervision/assistance of one staff with toileting; -Had an indwelling urinary catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine); -Had a urinary tract infection in the last 30 days. Record review of the resident's January 2020 physician order sheet showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #19) with a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) ventilation machine had a physician order for the use and care of the machine. A sample of 18 residents were selected for review in a facility with a census of 60. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Continuous Pressure Airway Pressure (CPAP) Administration, undated, showed: -Purpose to administer CPAP to maintain open airway to the resident with obstructed sleep apnea or respiratory problems breathing when sleeping; -Check physician's order for pressure setting and method of administration; -CPAP machine should be placed on table near bed; -Fill humidifier with distilled water to appropriate level (optional may use tap water); -Assist resident as needed to applying and adjusting CPAP mask and head strap; -Use a wet cloth or cleaning cloth to wipe the outside surface of the CPAP machine; -Clean the back filter weekly by running it under warm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the record was accurate and complete when staff did not document one resident's (Resident #52) decline in condition for seven days before the resident's death. A sample of 18 residents was selected for review in a facility with a census of 60. Record review of the facility's policy, undated, titled Charting and Documentation showed the following: -The purpose of these guidelines is to provide a complete account of the resident's care, treatment, response to the care, signs, symptoms, as well as the resident's progress; -Guidance to the physician in prescribing appropriate medications and treatments; -The facility, as well as other interested parties, with a tool for measuring the quality of care provided to the resident; -Nursing services personnel with a record of the physical and mental status of each resident; -Assistance in the development of a plan of care for each resident; -The elements of quality medical nurse care; -A legal record that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-01-09 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the daily nurse staffing was posted to accurately reflect the actual staff hours to care for the 58 current residents. 1. Observations throughout the facility, on 01/06/25 through 01/09/25, showed the Daily Nursing Roster was posted in the facility at the North Hall Nurse Station on 01/06/25, at 2:00 P.M.; on 01/07/25, at 9:50 A.M.; on 01/08/25, at 5:00 P.M.; and on 01/09/25, at 11:25 A.M., without ensuring all information was documented. The daily postings failed to document the daily resident census, whether or not the nurse was a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) or Registered Nurse (RN), or the actual hours worked by the staff. During an interview on 01/09/25, at 11:30 AM, Central Supply (CS) and the Human Resources (HR)Director confirmed that they were not aware that the daily nurse postings required the resident census and/or the need to identify the licensing of the nurse. They said the Director of Nursing (DON) was the one responsible for posting them daily. During an interview on 01/09/25, at 5:22 P.M., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2020-01-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop written policies and procedures for reporting abuse, mistreatment, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property in accordance with federal requirements when the facility's policy did not direct staff to report all allegations of abuse to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within two hours. The facility's was 60. 1. Record review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Policy/Elder Justice Act, revised on 1/16/19, showed the following information: -It is the policy of the facility to establish a resident-sensitive and secure environment to assure proper and respectful treatment of all residents. The facility is obligated to ensure that residents have the right to be free from verbal, mental, physical and sexual abuse, involuntary seclusion and neglect. The facility will not tolerate any abuse and will promptly and thoroughly investigate any allegation of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property and all injuries…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CRANDALL, STANLEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/17/2023
DAVIDSON, ARLENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/2020
DIAZ, JOSEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2015
FREEMAN, MELISSAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/31/2019
JENKINS, PAMALAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/2020
PARRIGON, DARLENEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/10/2023
SMART, RANDALIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2015
SNYDER, GARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/08/2022
THOMPSON, KYLEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/06/2021
TONJUK, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/14/2018
WEBER, SARAHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/20/2020
WHITE, TEREASAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/17/2023
THE OZARKS METHODIST MANOROrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO DATE PROVIDED
JENKINS, JAMIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
POWERS, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/14/2020
RAINEY, HAROLDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/19/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 5%Other / private 28%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$328per resident / day
operating cost
$9,956per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$318per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265594. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next