Living Center, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 134 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 29.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 67.1 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident (Resident #1), in a review of seven sampled residents. Staff failed to monitor Resident #1, who was taken outside by staff, at approximately 1:27 P.M. to 3:30 P.M. The resident sat in the courtyard under the gazebo and self-propelled him/herself in the courtyard with temperatures between 78 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 86 degrees F. When discovered by staff at approximately 3:30 P.M., the resident had wheeled himself/herself out from under the gazebo, had his/her back wheel of the wheelchair off of the sidewalk, had taken his/her shoes and socks off and had a red face and his/her skin was hot to touch. The resident was assessed and noted to have an elevated temperature of 101.3 degrees F (normal temperature is between 97.8 degrees F and 99.1 degrees F), had lethargy (sluggish, drowsy and lack of energy), was dry heaving and leaning to the right with reddened skin. The facility census was 64. The administrator was notified of the past noncompliance on 07/09/25 which occurred on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2023-02-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to routinely assess pain, administer pain medications timely after pain was identified, notify the physician of unresolved pain, administer pain medications in anticipation of activities that cause pain, and re-evaluate if medications administered were effective for one resident (Resident #1) who was distressed, and rated his/her pain a eight on a zero to ten scale with ten being the worst pain possible. The resident said he/she was hurting too bad to get out of bed for lunch. The resident had possible fractures that had been identified and had not been treated, and pressure ulcers to his/her heels and coccyx. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility's policy on Pain Assessment and Management, revised on March 2015, showed the following: -The purposes of this procedure are to help the staff identify pain in the resident and to develop interventions that are consistent with the resident's goals and needs and that address the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two ice machines were free of a buildup of debris, failed to properly store an ice scoop in the serving kitchen, and failed to ensure the refreshment area ice machine was equipped with an adequate air gap. The facility also failed to safely store food items in two refrigerators in the serving kitchen. The facility census was 69. 1. Review of the facility policy, Infection Prevention and Control, Nutritional Services, dated May 2015, showed the following guidance for the Ice Machine in the Food Server Area: -Run the scoop through the dish machine and air dry daily. Store them in clean Ziploc bag; -Wipe the exterior of the machine with warm, sudsy water, rinse and sanitize weekly; -The vendor is responsible for cleaning ice machine quarterly; -Check the interior of the ice cabinet, lid and gaskets for any signs of mold or mildew between monthly vendor visits. If they're visible, follow the cleaning procedures. Observation on 07/15/24 at 10:33 A.M. in the dining room serving kitchen, showed an ice machine…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0638 — pattern
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated resident assessment completed by the facility staff, was completed no less than once every three months for one resident (Resident #34), of 20 sampled residents and four additional residents (Resident #13, #38, #48 and #54). The facility census was 69. 1. During an interview on 07/18/24 at 3:59 P.M., Registered Nurse (RN) A said the facility followed the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual to guide completion of all of the MDS assessments and the facility did not have a specific policy related to MDS completion. 2. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual MDS 3.0, dated 2023, showed the following: -The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 (OBRA 1987) regulations require nursing homes that are Medicare certified, Medicaid certified or both, to conduct initial and periodic assessments for all their residents. The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process is the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately document appropriate diagnoses of residents or resident behaviors to justify the implementation for continued use of antipsychotic medications (a type of psychiatric medication used to treat certain types of mental health problems, such as schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly) and bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), for three residents (Resident #12, #34 and #56), and failed to complete a 14-day review for the PRN (as-needed) use of a benzodiazepine (a drug that produces sedation and hypnosis) for three residents (Resident #42, #57 and #63) in a review of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 69. Review of the facility's policy, Antipsychotic Medication Use, dated (revised) December 2016, showed the following: -Antipsychotic medications may be considered for residents with dementia but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1), in a review of 20 sampled residents, remained free from misappropriation of property when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) F took the resident's cellular phone and made charges of approximately $200 to the resident's online shopping account without the resident's knowledge. The facility census was 69. On 7/3/24 at 4:08 P.M., the administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 6/25/24. On 6/25/24, the administrator became aware of the violation of misappropriation of the resident's phone and charges made to the resident's online shopping account by CNA F. Upon discovery, the facility canceled the contract with CNA F through the contracting company, conducted an investigation, and notified appropriate parties. Staff reviewed the facility misappropriation policy, and all facility staff were educated on the facility misappropriation policy. CNA F was terminated. The deficiency was corrected on 6/26/24.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of abuse were reported immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation was made, for one resident (Resident #2), in a review of five sampled residents. Resident #2 reported staff threw him/her into the sink while assisting the resident in the bathroom on 9/17/23. The facility failed to report the allegation of abuse to the state survey agency. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility policy, Abuse Prevention Policy, dated 5/12/22, showed the following: -The residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. The facility prohibited mistreatment, neglect or abuse of the residents; -The facility must ensure all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property were reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from potential abuse after one resident (Resident #2), in a review of five sampled residents, reported Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) A and CNA B threw him/her into the sink while assisting the resident in the bathroom. The facility allowed the staff to continue to work the remainder of their shift on 9/17/23 and the following night shift. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility policy, Abuse Prevention Policy, dated 5/12/22, showed the following: -Abuse was the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, or deprivation by and individual, including a caretaker of goods or services that were necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental and psychological well-being; -Physical abuse was hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, etc. It also included controlling behavior through corporal punishment; -The facility must ensure all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect or abuse, including injuries…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and communicate to staff effective interventions to prevent falls for one resident (Resident #2), who was admitted with left sided weakness from stroke, in a review of six sampled residents. The resident rolled out of bed on the left side when trying to obtain items that were out of reach. The facility staff also failed to use appropriate transfer techniques for the resident, who staff assessed as high risk for falls, when they failed to transfer the resident using a gait belt (canvas belt placed around the resident's waist to assist with ambulation, transfer, and positioning) as directed in the resident's plan of care. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility's undated policy, How to Transfer an Individual Using a Gait Belt, showed the purpose was to provide safety and protection from possible injury during transfers and ambulation. Apply the belt while the individual was in a comfortable sitting position. If the individual had a weak side, make sure his/her stronger side was facing the destination such…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to maintain the highest practical well-being for one resident (Resident #1) with a diagnosis of dementia, in a review of five sampled residents. The facility identified the resident did not like and became upset when staff of the opposite sex provided his/her care. The facility failed to ensure the direct care staff who provided care for the resident on 9/17/23 were of the same sex as the resident, and failed to follow the resident's care plan to approach the resident at another time when the resident was combative or refused care. During incontinence care on 9/17/23, the resident became upset, combative, swatting his/her arms, and resisted care. Staff continued to provide care for the resident, and the resident sustained a skin tear. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility policy, Dementia Clinical Protocol, dated March 2015, showed the following: -The facility would review the past and current physical, functional, and psychosocial status of each individual with dementia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper handwashing techniques during meal service. The facility census was 76. Observation on 02/06/23 during the noon meal service showed the following: -At 12:03 P.M., Dietary Aide A wore gloves and touched trays, plates, meal tickets, and ice cream cups, and without removing his/her gloves touched the potatoes on a resident's plate with his/her gloved hand; -At 12:10 P.M., Dietary Aide A touched plates and the microwave, and without removing his/her gloves, picked up a hamburger bun with his/her gloved hand, and placed it on a resident's plate; -At 12:17 P.M., Dietary Aide A touched plates, trays, and utensils, and without removing his/her gloves, picked up a hamburger bun with his/her gloved hand, and placed it on a resident's plate; -At 12:27 P.M., Dietary Aide A touched plates, the plate warmer, and trays, and without removing his/her gloves, picked up a hamburger bun with his/her gloved hand, and placed it on the resident's plate. He/She then touched utensils, menu slips, and trays, and without removing his/her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-02-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of needs for three residents (Residents #9, #17 and #53), in a review of 19 sampled residents, when their call lights were not accessible for use. The facility census was 76. The facility did not have a policy on call light accessibility. 1. Review of Resident #9's face sheet showed the resident's diagnoses included dementia and cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it, also known as a stroke). Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/17/22, showed the following: -Moderately impaired cognition; -Total dependence on two staff for transfers. Review of the resident's care plan, revised on 1/23/23, showed the following: -Provide him/her with dependent help of two staff for transfers with a hoyer lift (a mechanical lift used with a sling to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $451K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO