No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Webco Manor

1687 West Washington, Marshfield, MO 65706 · Non profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (417) 859-5144 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (417) 859-5144 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609, F0610) — most recent Jan 20261 actual-harm citation1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
1245 Banning Street
Pharmacy
483 Pomme de Terre Dr · (417) 468-4442 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
14740 State Hwy #38 · (417) 630-9408 · Call to confirm hours
Park
716 W Hubble Dr · (417) 425-7495 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1538 W Washington St · (417) 859-4065

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased30.9%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.0%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.1%2.3%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.7%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.9%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.3%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.0%25.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.4%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.3%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.1%17.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table25.0%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.7%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine72.1%63.5%79.4%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.102.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.892.331.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.9–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 3.9–13.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-28)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-12-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess pain, follow-up on effectiveness of pain medication, failed to try additional steps when pain was not relieved, and failed to notify the physician of the pain, ineffectiveness of the current pain medication regimen, and when an order for a new pain medication was not received from the pharmacy for one resident (Resident #1) in a review of four sampled residents. The facility census was 52. Review of the facility's policy titled 'Pain Assessment and Management, revised March 2015, showed the following: -The purposes of this procedure are to help the staff identify pain in the resident, and to develop interventions that are consistent with the resident's goals and needs and that address the underlying causes of pain; -Pain management is defined as the process of alleviating the resident's pain to a level that is acceptable to the resident and is based on his or her clinical condition and established treatment goals;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure each resident's code status preference was clear and accurate when staff failed to update a full code (every possible measure, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR - an emergency procedure that is done when a person stops breathing or heart stops, to save a person's life)) to a do not resuscitate (DNR - an order that instructs providers not to start CPR if a person stops breathing or heart stops) for one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 61. On [DATE], Social Services Director (SSD) notified the Administrator that staff provided CPR to Resident #1, who wished to be a DNR. On [DATE], the facility completed an audit of all residents' code status. On [DATE] the facility implemented a new process and in-serviced all staff. The non-compliance was corrected on [DATE]. Review of the facility's Advanced Directive Policy, revised [DATE], showed the following information:-Upon admission, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all allegations of possible abuse were thoroughly and timely investigated, and steps were taken to protect all residents during the investigation, when staff did not begin an immediate investigation into an allegation staff to resident (Resident #1) abuse and the staff member continued to work independently with residents. The facility census was 64.Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, undated, showed the following information:-Types of abuse include physical, verbal, sexual, mental, and financial exploitation;-The Administrator or Director of Nursing (DON) or designee must begin an internal investigation immediately and report to DHSS. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (a brief resident profile sheet) showed the following information:-admission date of 02/02/24;-Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (an autoimmune disease disrupting brain to body communication). Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible abuse were reported timely to State Survey Agency (SSA - Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS)) when staff failed to report an allegation of staff to resident abuse within the required two hours of the facility staff becoming aware of the allegation involving one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 64. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, undated, showed the following information:-Types of abuse include physical, verbal, sexual, mental, and financial exploitation;-All employees are mandated reporters;-Any suspicion or knowledge of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation must be reported immediately to the Administrator and charge nurse;-The Administrator or Director of Nursing (DON) or designee must begin an internal investigation immediately and report to DHSS;-Reports must be made to the Missouri DHSS within two hours if allegation alleges serious injury or 24 hours if it does not allege serious injury.1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (a brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately to facility management and within two hours to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Service (DHSS) when the facility failed to report one resident's (Resident #1) allegation of abuse by a staff member in a timely fashion. The facility census was 56.Review of the facility's policy titled. Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, revised April 2021 showed the following:-All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported;-If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, or injury of unknown source is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident when staff did not ensure physicians' orders and pharmacy dosage directions matched resulting in staff administering incorrect dosages of Paxlovid (oral antiviral medication used to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease (an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus)) to four residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3 and Resident #4) out of 9 sampled residents. The facility census was 55.Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Orders, revised 11/2014, showed the following:-The purpose of the procedure was to establish uniform guidelines in the receiving and recording of medication orders;-When recording orders for medication, specify the type, route, dosage, frequency and strength of the medication ordered. A placebo is considered a medication and must also have specific orders.Review of the facility's policy titled Telephone Orders, revised 02/2014,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all resident care plans were completed and current when staff failed to care plan related to a relationship and restrictions involving two residents (Resident #20 and #2) and when the staff failed to care plan new falls and new interventions for one resident (Resident #50). A sample of 20 residents was reviewed in a facility with a census of 57. Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised December 2016, showed the following:-A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident;-Identifying problem areas and their causes, and developing interventions that are targeted and meaningful to the resident, are the endpoint of an interdisciplinary process;-Care plan interventions are chosen only after careful data gathering, proper sequencing of events,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent and treat urinary tract infections when staff failed to notify the physician of and provide treatment for suspected urinary tract infections (UTI) two residents (Resident #17 and #51). The facility also failed to ensure proper catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the body to drain fluid) use for residents when staff failed to obtain appropriate physician orders to place a catheter, to provide catheter care, and to change the catheter for one resident (Resident #43) with an indwelling urinary catheter. The facility census was 57.Review of the facility policy titled, “Urinary Tract Infections (UTI)/Bacteriuria-Clinical Protocol,” revised June 2014, showed the following:-The staff and practitioner will identify individuals with signs and symptoms suggesting a possible UTI;-The physician will help nursing staff interpret the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program when the facility failed to ensure the required two step tuberculosis (TB - a communicable disease that affects the lungs characterized by fever, cough, and difficulty breathing) screening test was administered timely for six staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E, Certified Medication Technician (CMT) F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) G, CMT K, LPN G, and Dietary Aide (DA) I) of ten sampled staff members. The facility census was 57.Review of the facility's policy titled Tuberculosis, Employee Screening, revised July 2010, showed the following:-All employees shall be screening for tuberculosis (TB), infection and disease, using a two-step tuberculin skin test (TST) or blood assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (BAMT) and symptom screening, prior to beginning employment;-Each newly hired employee is screened for TB infection and disease after an employment offer has been made, but prior to the employee's duty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-28 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from possible chemical restraints when staff failed to implement a physician approved pharmacy recommendation to decrease an antipsychotic in a timely fashion for one resident (Resident #4) out of a sample of five residents. The facility census was 57. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding pharmacy consultations or pharmacy recommendations. 1. Review of Resident #4's face sheet (resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following:-admission date of 12/08/22;-Diagnoses included cognitive communication deficit, unspecified dementia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated 05/12/25, showed the following:-Severe cognitive impairment;-No behaviors;-The resident took antipsychotic medication. Review of the resident's care plan, revised 05/20/25, showed the following:-The resident was at risk for adverse reactions to psychotropic medications as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion when facility staff failed to obtain an order for the use of a brace, failed to document use of a brace, failed to monitor the use of a brace, and failed to care plan the use of brace to the right-hand brace for one resident (Resident #8) with a contracture. The facility census was 57.Review of a facility policy titled Assistive Devices and Equipment, dated July 2017, showed the following:-The facility provides, maintains, trains, and supervises the use of assistive devices and equipment for residents;-Devices and equipment that assist with resident mobility, safety, and independence are provide for residents;-Recommendations for the use of devices and equipment are based on the comprehensive assessment and documented in the resident care plan;-Staff will be trained and demonstrate competency on the use of devices;-The following factors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-28 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who required colostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening, or stoma, in the abdominal wall to allow the colon to pass waste through the body) services, receive such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences when staff failed to obtain an order for a colostomy, colostomy care, and colostomy monitoring, failed to assess resident for ability to provide self-care for the colostomy, and failed to care plan self-care of the colostomy for one resident (Resident #49). The facility census was 57. Review of the facility's policy titled Colostomy/Ileostomy Care, revised October 2010, showed the following:-The purpose of the procedure was to provide guidelines that would aid in preventing exposure of the resident's skin to fecal matter;-Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident;-The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed document identification and use of possible alternatives prior to use of side rails; failed to document assessing risk versus benefits of side rail use; failed to obtain informed consent for the use of side rails prior to installation,; and failed to obtain physician orders for side rail usage, for one resident (Resident #50). The facility's census was 57. Review of the resident's quarterly fall risk assessment, dated 11/27/17, showed the resident to was a moderate risk with diminished safety awareness and poor recall and judgment.Review of the resident's entry Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated 05/08/25, showed the following information:-Severe cognitive impairment;-Partial assistance with toileting, showers, upper and lower body dressing, personal hygiene, lying to sitting and chair to chair transfer.Review of the facility records showed on 05/12/25, staff completed a bed rail safety check. Review of the resident's care plan, last revised on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-28 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare all food in a form designed to meet each resident's needs when staff failed to appropriately prepare thickened liquids to nectar consistency for one resident (Resident #27) in a selected sample of 20 residents. The facility census was 57. Review of the facility's policy titled 'Thickened Liquids, dated 2022, showed the following:-Liquids are categorized as thin - Level 0 (regular), mildly thick - Level 2 (nectar-like), moderately thick-Level 3 (honey-like), and extremely thick - Level 4 (pudding-like) for the purposes of this manual;-If liquids are to be thickened by nursing or dining service staff, proper training on the use of the thickening product and specific product instructions should be conducted by the Dining Services Manager, Speech Language Pathologist, or Registered Dietitian;-Proper preparation of thickened liquids improves acceptance and safety for individuals requiring thickened liquids;-The type of thickener, temperature of the liquid being thickened, and amount of thickening product…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were offered, and received if requested, the pneumococcal vaccine when one resident (Resident #55) requested the vaccine, but staff failed to administer the vaccine and when facility staff failed to offer one resident (Resident #17), or his/her responsible party, the vaccine. The facility census was 57.Review of the facility policy titled, Pneumococcal Vaccine, revised August 2016, showed the following:-All residents will be offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia and pneumococcal infections;-Prior to or upon admission, residents will be assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, will be offered the vaccine series within 30 days of admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated of the resident has already been vaccinated;-Before receiving a pneumococcal vaccine, the resident or legal representative shall receive information and education regarding the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-28 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete call light system accessible to all residents when staff failed to consistently place the call light within the reach of one resident (Resident #8). The facility census was 57.Review of the facility policy titled Answering the Call Light, dated October 2010, showed the following:-The purpose of the procedure was to respond to the resident requests and needs;-Be sure the call light is plugged in at all times;-When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident;-Answer the resident's call as soon as possible. 1. Review of Resident #8's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following:-admission date of 06/06/25;-Diagnoses included cerebral infarction (sudden loss of brain function that occurs when blood flow to the brain is interrupted), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) of right side, muscle weakness, and aphasia (language disorder that affects a person's ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents' families or representatives were notified of all significant changes and potential changes in care when staff did not notify two residents' (Resident #1 and #2) family/representative after a change in condition/allegation of abuse. The facility census was 54. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding notification of resident representatives. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (admission data) showed the following: -admission date of 09/07/24; -Diagnoses included unspecified dementia (loss of memory), psychotic disturbances (mental health condition that causes people to lose touch with reality, and depression (feelings of sadness). Review of the resident's care plan, last revised on 12/11/24, showed the following: -The resident had communication problems as evidenced by his/her impaired hearing. He/she usually understands; -The resident had mood problems; -Staff to establish trusting relationship with resident and encourage resident to verbalize feelings, concerns, fears, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible abuse were reported immediately to management and within two hours to the state licensing agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) when staff failed to report two allegation of sexual abuse involving three residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3) to management and DHSS in a timely fashion. The facility census was 54. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect-Clinical Protocol, revised July 2017, showed the following: -Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse and mental abuse; -Sexual abuse is the non-consensual contact of any type with a resident. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program, revised December 2021, showed the following: -Purpose to protect residents from abuse by anyone, including but not necessarily limited to, facility staff, other residents; - Investigate and report any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to immediately begin an investigation of possible abuse when staff witnessed one resident (Resident #1) touch another resident (Resident #3) in the groin area. The facility census was 54. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect-Clinical Protocol, revised July 2017, showed the following: -Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse; -Sexual abuse is defined as non-consensual contact of any type with a resident; -Staff, with the physician's input as needed, will investigate alleged occurrences of abuse and neglect to clarify what happened and identify possible causes. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program, revised December 2021, showed the following: -Purpose to protect residents from abuse by anyone, including but not necessarily limited to, facility staff, other residents; -Identify and assess all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a comprehensive person-centered care plan for all residents when staff failed to update the care plan for one resident (Resident #1) to include two incidents of the resident touching other residents inappropriately. The facility's census was 54 Review showed the facility did not provide a policy on updating care plans. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (admission data) showed the following: -admission date of 09/07/24; -Diagnoses included unspecified dementia (loss of memory), psychotic disturbances (mental health condition that causes people to lose touch with reality), and depression (feelings of sadness). Review of the resident's care plan, last revised on 12/11/24, showed the following: -The resident had communication problems as evidenced by his/her impaired hearing. He/she usually understands; -The resident had activities of daily living (ADL) functional problems as evidenced by the need for staff assistance with ADLs due to my diagnosis of (nothing added). Balance wasn't always steady, but he/she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care per standards of practice when staff failed to address and notify the provider of a change in condition for one resident (Resident #1) whose knees became swollen, red, warm, and painful. The facility census was 52. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to change of condition. 1. Review of Resident #1''s face sheet (brief resident profile sheet) showed the following: -admission date of 03/08/23; -Diagnoses included cognitive communication deficit, rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic autoimmune disease that causes inflammation in the joints, resulting in pain, swelling, stiffness, and tenderness), osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease that causes the cartilage and bone in joints to break down over time), and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 03/16/23, showed the following: -The resident had activities of daily living (ADL - dressing, grooming, bathing, eating, and toileting) functional problems as evidenced by the need for staff assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide protective oversight to all residents when staff did not put new interventions in place after, or make all working staff aware of, elopement attempts made by one resident (Resident #1) with a history of wandering and talking about leaving the facility. The resident eloped later the same day and was found in a nearby [NAME], located between the facility and the interstate. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility's policy titled, Elopement Policy & Procedure, undated, showed the following: -Elopement included when a resident left the premises or a safe area, without authorization and/or necessary supervision placing the resident at risk for harm or injury; -It is the intent of the facility to be aware of its residents usual habits and locations as reasonably practicable; -If the resident used an electronic device that alarms, the supervisor or designee will determine location of device on resident and test any used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-19 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's choice of code status (the desire to be resuscitated or not if breathing stops) was clearly documented in each resident's chart when four residents' (Resident #8, #43, #150, and #5) charts had conflicting information regarding code status. A sample of 14 residents was selected for review out of a facility census of 47. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding resident choice of code status. 1. Review of Resident #8's Face Sheet, dated reviewed [DATE], showed the following: -admission date of [DATE]; -Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (the heart loses the ability to pump enough blood), chronic kidney disease, history of pneumonia and bronchitis, pain, cognitive loss, and difficulty making decisions; -Code status of do not resuscitate (DNR - a person has decided not to have cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR - an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care for all residents on oxygen per professional standards of practice when staff failed to ensure oxygen equipment was cared for in a manner to prevent possible contamination or bacteria growth for three residents (Resident #20, #5, and #9) and when staff a failed to care plan regarding the care of oxygen equipment for two residents (Resident #20 and #9). The facility census was 47. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care of Oxygen Equipment, undated, showed the following: -Staff should remove the humidifier bottle weekly and wash it in warm soapy water, rinse thoroughly and air dry before refilling with distilled water; -Staff should remove and clean oxygen cannula's/masks as needed, and weekly by night nurse; -Staff should place oxygen cannula/mask and tubing in a plastic ziplock bag when not in use, and secure the bag to the tank carrier or oxygen concentrator with masking tape, and should be changed and dated weekly on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-19 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete and document risks vs benefits reviewed, assessment for entrapment, prior alternatives tried, or informed/signed consent for the bed rails before installing bed rails on five residents' (Resident #1, #4, #9, #11, and #13) beds. The facility census was 47. Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Safety and Bed Rails, revised August 2022, showed the following: -The use of bed rails is prohibited unless the criteria for use of bed rails have been met; -The resident's sleeping environment is evaluated by the interdisciplinary team; -Bed frames, mattresses and bed rails are checked for compatibility and size prior to use; -Regardless of mattress type, width, length, and/or depth, the bed frame, bed rails and mattress will leave no gap wide enough to entrap a resident's head or body. Any gaps in the bed system are within the safety dimensions established by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA); -Maintenance staff routinely inspects…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to maintain an effective infection control program when staff failed to perform proper hand hygiene while performing personal cares and perineal care on three sampled residents (Residents #20, #4, and #34). The facility census was 47. Review of the facility's policy Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, reviewed July 2019, showed the following: -Hand hygiene is the primary means to prevent the spread of infections; -Hand hygiene products and supplies (sinks, soap, towels, alcohol-based hand rub etc.) shall be readily accessible and convenient for staff use to encourage compliance with hand hygiene policies; -Wash hands with soap and water when hands are visibly soiled and after contact with a resident; -Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol or alternatively, soap and water for the following: before and after coming on duty, before and after direct contact with residents, before donning sterile gloves, before moving from a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed ensure care was completed in accordance with standards of practice when staff failed to care plan the use of a neck brace, failed to address the neck brace not fitting correctly, and failed to arrange timely follow-up physician appointments for one resident (Resident #43) who was admitted after being diagnosed with a neck fracture. The facility census was 47. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding regarding appointments, medical equipments, or follow-up on hospital directives. 1. Review of Resident #43's electronic Face Sheet showed the following: -admission date of 11/16/23; -Diagnoses included neck fracture, dementia, depression, and pain. Review of the resident's hospital notes, dated 11/12/23, showed the following: -Recommendation to continue use of neck brace and discussing with orthotist (a medical professional who specializes in making braces and splints) need for better-fitting neck brace to avoid skin breakdown; -Recommended follow-up with the neurosurgeon in four to six weeks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment to prevent possible urinary tract infections for all residents when staff failed to perform urinary catheter (tube placed into the bladder to drain urine) care for one resident (Resident #20), of two residents sampled, with an indwelling urinary catheter. The facility census was 47. Review of the facility's policy for Indwelling Catheter (Foley) Care, revised and reviewed August, 2018, showed the following: -Care for an indwelling urinary catheter can be delegated to certified nurse aides (CNAs); -Routine catheter care is a part of routine perineal hygiene; -Catheter care is performed every shift and as needed (PRN) for soiling. 1. Review of Resident #20's face sheet (admission information at a glance) showed the following: -admission date of 05/30/23; -Diagnoses included urinary tract infection (infection in the bladder and urine) and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (lack of bladder control due to brain, spinal cord, or nerve problems. Review of the resident's physician's order, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-06-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide an effective, thorough program for the prevention of the growth of the Legionella bacteria (a bacteria which causes a respiratory disease when breathing in small droplets of water in the air that contain Legionella) when staff were unaware of the steps the facility needed to take to prevent Legionella; staff failed to complete a Legionella risk assessment for the facility; and staff failed to monitor water temperatures and the pH (a measure of how acidic/basic water is) levels routinely. The facility census was 54. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Toolkit for Legionella (which is officially titled Developing a Water Management Program to Reduce Legionella Growth & Spread in Buildings) showed that healthcare facilities need to actively identify and manage hazardous conditions that support growth and spread of Legionella by: -Identifying building water systems for which Legionella control measures are needed; -Assess how much risk the hazardous conditions in those water systems pose; -Apply control measures to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to position a specialized call light within reach for one resident (Resident #36) who was dependent on staff for cares and failed to provide to consistently provide a [NAME] Cup (a lightweight spill proof drinking cup with a straw and handles and will not spill when shaken or tipped over) for one resident (Resident #20) as care planned to assist the resident with drinking. A sample of 16 residents was selected for review. The facility's census was 54. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Quality of Life-Accommodation of Needs, revised August 2009, showed the following information: -The facility's environment and staff behaviors are directed toward assisting the residents in maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being; -The resident's individual needs and preferences shall be accommodated to the extent possible, except when the health and safety of the individual or other residents would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely identify, assess, document, implement interventions, and follow-up on recommendations, for one resident (Resident #5) who developed limited range of motion progressing to contractures of his/her right hand out of a selected sample of 16 residents. The facility's census was 54. Record review of the facility's Functional Impairment-Clinical Protocol policy revised 9/2012, included the following: -Upon admission to the facility, at any time a significant change of condition occurs, and periodically during a resident's stay, the physician and staff will assess the resident physical condition and functional status; The physician will help identify individuals who have had a recent history of functional decline and those who are at risk for additional functional decline; -The staff will identify individuals with significant decline in function, including ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs - dressing, grooming, bathing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure water was consistently accessible to one (Resident #21) with a history of urinary tract infections (UTI - an infection in any part of the urinary system, the kidneys, bladder or urethra) in a selected sample of 16 residents. The facility's census was 54. Record view of the facility's policy Serving Drinking Water, revised October 2010, showed the following: -The purposes of this procedure are to provide the resident with a fresh supply of drinking water and to provide adequate fluids for the resident; -Return the water pitcher to the resident's bedside stand; -Place the water pitcher and cup within easy reach of the resident. Place flexible straws next to the water pitcher. 1. Record review of Resident #21's face sheet (document that gives resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -Last admission date of 5/12/17; -Diagnoses included age-related physical debility, constipation, and UTI. Record review of the resident's May 2021 physician orders showed the following: -An order, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-01-22 for 23 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MILLER, WHITNEYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL5%since 11/10/2014
ATKINSON, DONNAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2011
CARTER, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/12/2010
DUNN, CINDYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2013
DUTCHER, CHRISTINEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/10/2015
FLEMING, DONNAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2013
YOUNG, SALLYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2012

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 5%Other / private 28%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$237per resident / day
operating cost
$7,200per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$246per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265520. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next