Tiffany Heights
1531 Nebraska Street, Mound City, MO 64470 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (660) 442-3146 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.6% | 18.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 5.3% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.3% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.9% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.6% | 17.4% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.4% | 25.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.6% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.4% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.1% | 23.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 25.0% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.2% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.0% | 13.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.15 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.11 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 6.2–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 38.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 34.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 39.1 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.02 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when staff failed to use soap and water during handwashing. The facility census was 38.Review of facility policy for Food and Nutrition Services, Hand Washing, dated 2025, showed:- Employees are expected to practice proper hand hygiene;- When to wash hands: before starting work or handing food, before putting on gloves or changing gloves, after touching body (hair, face, nose, mouth), after handling raw food or garbage or chemicals or dirty dishes, after touching anything that may contaminate hands such as door handles or equipment or carts;- How to wash hands: wet hands and forearms with warm water, apply soap and work into a lather, scrub hands, wrists, and under fingernails, rinse thoroughly under running water, dry hands with disposable paper towel;1.Observation of the kitchen on 12/4/25, showed:- 9:20 A.M. Dietary [NAME] (A) used hand sanitizer upon entering kitchen and then started working with food; no handwashing was observed;-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0574 — patternThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were able to exercise their rights when the facility did not inform residents on where to find contact information for the State Survey Agency, how to file a complaint for seven residents of the resident counsel group or where to find the Ombudsman's contact information for one sampled resident (Resident #21) and seven of 14 resident council members. The facility census was 38.Review of facility Residents' Rights Policy, dated 6/10/25, showed:- A posting of names, addresses and phone numbers of all pertinent state client advocacy groups will be available in the facility;- The resident has the right to be informed of his or her rights and of all the rules and regulations governing resident conduct during his or her stay in the facility to include information and contact information for State and local advocacy organizations, including but not limited to the State Survey Agency, the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program and the protection and advocacy system. 1. Review of Resident #21's Annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for two residents (Residents #26 and #28) who could not obtain hot water of at least 105 degrees Fahrenheit in their rooms and for one resident (Resident #2) who had difficulty entering his/her room due to a structural impediment at the entrance door of his/her room. This affected three out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 38.Review of the facility policy, Safe Water Temperatures, dated 6/15/25, showed:- Staff will report abnormal findings, such as complaints of water too cold or hot, or any problems with water temperature to the supervisor and/or maintenance staff;- Water temperatures will be set to a temperature of no more than 120 degrees Fahrenheit or the state's allowable maximum water temperature;- Maintenance staff will check water heater temperature controls and the temperatures of tap water in all hot water circuits weekly and as needed;Review of the facility policy, Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to file grievances in writing, the right to file grievances anonymously, and the right to obtain a written decision regarding his or her grievance (Resident #28). This affected 12 out of the 14 residents who attended group meeting and one of the 12 sampled residents, (Resident #15). The facility census was 38. Review of facility policy, Residents' Rights, dated 6/10/25, showed:- The resident has the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished; and the behavior of staff and or other residents; and other concerns regarding their long-term care stay;- The resident has the right to, and the facility must make prompt efforts by the facility to resolve grievances the resident may have. Review of the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they developed and implemented a comprehensive person-centered plan of care which included measurable objectives and timeframes to address and meet each resident's specific medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs for two of the 12 sampled residents, (Resident #16 and #40). The facility census was 40. Review of the facility's policy for comprehensive care plans, revised 6/30/25 showed:- It was the policy of the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and ALL serviced that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment and meet professional standards of quality. - The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident's strengths, and needs, and will incorporate the resident's personal and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assure staff followed acceptable standards of practice for one sampled resident (Residents #28) when facility licensed staff did not transcribe admission orders correctly which resulted in the discontinuance of resident's Donepezil medication for dementia and placed the resident at risk for decline in mental health. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff administered eye drops correctly which affected Resident #9. This affected two of 12 sampled residents (Residents #9 and #28). The facility census was 38. Review of the facility's policy for medication administration, revised [DATE] showed: - Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. Review of the facility's policy for administration of eye drops or ointments, revised [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide proper respiratory care when staff failed to document the date when oxygen tubing was cleaned for one resident (Resident #6), failed to provide oxygen humidification for three residents (Resident #20, #21, and #22), and failed to properly store oxygen accessories at the bedside for four residents (Residents #6, #20, #21, and #22) resulting in possible exposure to dirt, dust and bacteria during oxygen usage. This affected three of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 38. Review of facility's policy Oxygen Administration, dated 5/16/25, showed:- Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician, except in the case of an emergency;- The resident's care plan shall identify the interventions for oxygen therapy including but not limited to type of oxygen delivery system, when to administer, equipment setting for the prescribed flow rates, and monitoring;- Staff shall perform hand hygiene and don gloves when administering oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to hire or designate a Registered Nurse (RN) to serve as the Director of Nursing (DON) on a full-time basis. The facility census was 38.The facility did not provide a policy for staffing a full-time DON. 1. Observations from 12/2/25 through 12/5/25 at various times showed the facility had charge nurses (CN) available but did not have a DON. During an interview on 12/2/25 at 10:00 A.M., the Administrator said:- The facility currently did not have a full-time DON.- The previous DON stepped down in September or October of this year. - There was always an RN scheduled eight hours a day, seven days a week during daytime hours.- A licensed nurse is scheduled on every shift. - She had three interviews this week and another one had been scheduled for this week.- The facility should have a full-time DON.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of the 12 sampled residents, (Resident #16) right to be free from verbal abuse when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B cursed at the resident and refused to provide care to the resident if his/she did not change his/her behavior. The facility census was 38. Review of the facility's policy for Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, revised 6/30/25, showed:- It is the policy of this facility to provide protection for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. - The facility will designate an Abuse Prevention Coordinator in the facility who is responsible for reporting allegations or suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation to the state survey agency and other officials in accordance with state law. - The facility will provide ongoing oversight and supervision of staff in order to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy when staff did not conduct a thorough investigation when one of the 12 sampled residents when (Resident #16), reported an observed allegation of verbal abuse of Resident #15 by LPN B. The facility census was 38. Review of the facility's policy for Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, revised 6/30/25, showed:- It is the policy of this facility to provide protection for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. - The facility will designate an Abuse Prevention Coordinator in the facility who is responsible for reporting allegations or suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation to the state survey agency and other officials in accordance with state law. - The facility will provide ongoing oversight and supervision of staff in order to assure that its policies are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 19 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff did not provide complete perineal care for two of 12 sampled residents (Resident #39 and #40). The facility census was 38. Review of the facility's policy, Perineal Care, dated 5/2/25, showed:- It is the practice of this facility to provide perineal care to all incontinent residents during routine bath and as needed in order to promote cleanliness and comfort, prevent infection to the extent possible, and to prevent and assess for skin breakdown;- Perform hand hygiene and put on gloves;- Cleanse all of the genital areas in the direction from front to back;- Use a clean portion of the washcloth or new disposable wipe with each stroke;- Cleanse the bottom of the genital area and the anal area from the front to the back; - Remove gloves and discard. Perform hand hygiene. 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral care and services for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident #16's), psychosocial well-being when staff did not address the resident's sexual behavior or offer alternative ways for the resident to deal with behaviors. The facility census was 12. The facility did not provide a policy for behaviors. 1. Review of Resident #16's care plan, revised 9/25/25 showed:- The resident had a behavior problem related to his traumatic brain injury. If reasonable, discuss the resident's behavior. Explain/reinforce why behavior is inappropriate and/or unacceptable to the resident. Monitor behavior episodes and attempt to determine underlying cause. Consider location, time of day, persons involved, and situations. Document behavior and potential causes. Nighttime cares will be completed with two staff members in room at all times. When behaviors occur, report to charge nurse for redirection. - The resident has a communication problem related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0851 — isolatedElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit the Payroll Based Journal data (PBJ, a report that provides staffing data set information submitted by nursing homes on a quarterly basis) correctly for Quarter 3, 2025 (April 1 to June 30) which had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 38. The facility did not have a policy for reporting direct care staffing information. Review of the facility's PBJ Staffing Data Report, showed the facility failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours per day on 4/2/25, 4/12/25, 4/15/25 and on 6/6/25.Review of the daily staffing sheets shoed the facility did have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours per day on 4/2/25, 4/12/25, 4/15/25 and on 6/6/25.During an interview on 12/2/25 at 10:00 A.M., the Administrator said:The facility always had a licensed nurse on duty for eight hours on every shift.The facility does not fill out the staffing information for the PBJ, that it done by the corporate office. It should be filled out correctly.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided care in a manner to prevent infection or the possibility of infection when staff did not properly set up enhanced barrier protection for one resident (Resident #29) and failed to ensure catheter tubing and dignity bag did not drag on the ground while resident was in a wheelchair (Resident #29). This affected one of 12 residents sampled. The facility census was 38. Review of facility policy, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 4/10/25, showed:- It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms;- All staff receive training on enhanced barrier precautions upon hire and as needed and are expected to comply with all designated precautions;- All staff receive training on high-risk activities and common organisms that require enhanced barrier precautions;- An order for enhanced barrier precautions will be obtained for residents with pressure ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, unhealed surgical wounds,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0554 — patternAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three sampled residents (Resident #6, #34, and #31) were assessed as safe to self-administer medications when medications were left at bedside table unattended by licensed staff. This affected three of the twelve sampled residents. The facility census was 37. Review of facility policy, self-administration of medications, dated March 2017, showed: -Staff and practitioner will assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is clinically appropriate for the resident. -In addition to general evaluation of decision-making capacity, the staff and practitioner will perform a more specific skill assessment, including the resident's: -ability to read and understand medication labels; -comprehension of the purpose and proper dosage and administration time of his or her own medications; -ability to remove medications from a container and to ingest and swallow (or otherwise administer)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to consider the views of the resident council and act promptly upon grievances and recommendations made by the group concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility when the facility failed to demonstrate their response and rationale for such responses. The facility additionally failed to maintain documentation of attempts to resolve concerns, or the facility's communication to the council on follow up actions. This affected eight of eight residents serving on the resident counsel and potentially other residents of the facility. The facility census was 37. Review of facility policy, Resident Council, 4/2017, showed: - A Resident Council Response Form will be utilized to track issues and their resolution. The facility department related to any issues will be responsible for addressing the item(s) of concern. The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee will review information and feedback from the Resident Council as part of their quality review. Issues documented on council response forms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a signature from the resident or or resident's legal representative on the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) forms prior to discharging from Medicare services for two residents (Resident #23 and #13) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 37. Review of form instructions skilled nursing facility advance beneficiary notice of non-coverage (SNFABN) Form CMS-10055, dated 4/8/2014, showed: -Signature and date: The beneficiary or their authorized representative must sign the signature box to acknowledge that they read and understood the notice. The skilled nursing facility may fill in the date if the beneficiary needs help. The date should reflect the date the SNF gave therm notice to the beneficiary in-person or when appropriate, the date contact was made with the beneficiary's authorized representative by phone. If an authorized representative signs for he beneficiary, write 'rep' or representative next to the signature. If the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain the privacy of three of the 12 sampled residents, (Resident #10, #17 and #32), when staff failed to post signage at the front door or outside each sampled resident's rooms to indicate 24 hour camera surveillance was in progress and failed to obtain consents from the responsible parties of the sampled residents. The facility census 37. Review of the facility's policy for videotaping, photographing, and other imaging of residents, revised April, 2027, showed, in part: - Residents will be protected from invasion of privacy and/or abuse that might occur from photographs, videotapes, digital images, and recordings during resident care or other facility activities; - For the purpose of this policy, resident image means the likeness of a resident captured through still digital images, and recordings during resident care or other facility activities; - The facility policy did not address the use of camera surveillance, posting of camera…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop individualized person centered comprehensive care plans for five residents when the care plan failed to address five resident's code status wishes (Resident #18, #34, #6, #8, and #25). This affected five of twelve sampled residents. The facility census was 37. Review of facility policy, care plans, comprehensive person-centered, undated, showed: -A comprehensive, person centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. -The interdisciplinary team, in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. -The care planning process will incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preferences in developing the goals of care. -Reflect on the resident's expressed wishes regarding care and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they developed a comprehensive person-centered plan of care consistent with measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet the residents medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs for six residents (#7, #27, #34, #17, #18,#6) of the12 sampled residents. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility's undated Care Plan Policy showed: - Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. - The Interdisciplinary Team must review and update the care plan: a. When there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; b. When the desired outcome is not met; c. When the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and -The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed professional standards of care for four of the 12 sampled residents when staff installed side rails without a physician's order which affected one sampled resident, (Resident #18); failed to obtain orders for self-administration of drugs for one sampled resident, (Resident #34); failed to follow physician orders for medications (Resident #31) and immobilizer (Resident #34), and left blanks in the documentation on the MAR (Medication Administration Record) for one resident (Resident #6). The facility census was 37. The facility did not provide a policy on professional standards of care. Review of the facility policy regarding documentation of medication administration, showed: - The facility shall maintain a medication administration record to document all medications administered. - Administration of medication must be documented immediately after (never before) it is given. Review of the facility policy regarding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to support residents in their choice of activities designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident when residents were not offered activities. This affected two residents (Residents #12 and #29) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility's Activities policy, revised August 2006, showed, in part: - Activity programs are designed to encourage maximum individual participation and are geared to the individual resident's needs; - Activities are scheduled seven days a week and residents are given an opportunity to contribute to the planning, preparation, conducting, cleanup, and critique of the programs; Review of the facility's Activities Documentation policy, revised December 2009, showed, in part: -Recordkeeping is a vital part of the activity programs; - Activity Department personnel will maintain records…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure they obtained a signed and dated statement from the pharmacist when no irregularities were identified during the medication regimen review, and when the pharmacist date of review and name was not listed on any medication regimen reviews. Failed to provide documentation that a monthly medication regimen review was completed, and failed to provide documentation that the medication regimen review was provided to the physician monthly. This affected five of the twelve sampled residents (Resident #6, #18, #3, #7 and #27). The facility census was 37. Review of facility policy, Medication Regimen Review, Revised April 2007, showed: -The consultant pharmacist shall review the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly. -Consultant pharmacist will perform a medication regimen review (MRR) for every resident in the facility. -The Consultant Pharmacist will document his/her findings and recommendation on the monthly drug/medication regimen review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained a medication error rate of less than five percent. Staff made two medication errors out of 25 opportunities for error, resulting in a medication error rate of 8%. This affected two of the 12 sampled residents, (Resident #16 and #32). The facility census was 37. Review of the facility's undated policy for nasal drops/spray medication administration showed: - Withdraw the medication into the dropper or uncap the spray or squeeze bottle if this is the type of dispenser used; - Ask the resident to breathe through the mouth during the administration. Review of the package leaflet for Flonase nasal spray, revised March 2016, showed, in part: - Shake the bottle gently; - Blow your nose to clear the nostrils; - Close one side of the nostril. Tilt your head forward slightly and carefully insert the nasal applicator into the other nostril; - Start to breathe in through your nose, and while breathing in press firmly and quickly down one time on the applicator to release the spray; - Repeat in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff served food to the residents that was palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature when cooked foods were not temperature checked and finished products were held on the steam line in excess of three hours for 6 of 8 residents sampled (Resident #6, #7, #17, #27, #34, #36). The facility census was 37. No policy on required temperature checks of cooked food was provided. Review of facility policy, food safety and sanitation, undated, showed: -There was no guidance on how to prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Review of facility policy, assistance with meals, revised September 2013, showed: -For all residents, hot foods shall be held at a temperature of 136 degrees or above until served. Cold foods shall be held at 40 degrees or below until served. Nursing and Dietary Services will establish procedures such that delivery of food to serving areas…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility staff failed to maintain an effective infection control program when staff did not ensure residents with open wounds (Resident #18) and catheters (#17) were placed on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and when clean laundry was not covered during transportation in the facility. This affected two of the 12 sampled residents (Residents #18, and #17). The facility census was 37. Review of facility policy, infection control, dated 3/2020, showed: -It was the policy of the facility to protect residents and staff from communicable diseases and infections. -For residents for whom enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) are indicated, EBP is employed when performing the following high -contact resident care activities: -Dressing -Bathing/Showering -Transferring; -Providing Hygiene; -Changing linens -Changing briefs or assisting with toileting; -Device care or use: central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube tracheostomy/ventilator; -Wound care: any skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to assure staff provided catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care in a manner to prevent a urinary tract infection(UTI) or the possibility of a UTI for one of the 12 sampled residents, (Resident #1). The facility census was 37. Review of the facility's undated policy for indwelling urinary catheter, showed, in part: - Position the resident on their back; - Wash around the catheter insertion site and then from the tip of the skin fold down to the body, including all skin folds; - Cleanse approximately 1/3 of catheter tubing from the insertion site. 1. Review of Resident #1's care plan, revised 5/28/24 showed: - The resident had an indwelling catheter related to obstructive uropathy (a urinary tract condition that occurs when urine flow is blocked, causing urine to back up into the kidneys). Position the catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and away from entrance room door. Change the 18 french (fr.) catheter monthly. Monitor, record, report to physician for signs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy for storage of medications when they stored food and medication in the medication refrigerator. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility's undated policy for storage of medications showed, in part: - The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner; - Medications requiring refrigeration must be stored in a refrigerator per the manufacturer recommendation and located in the drug room at the nurse's station or other secured location; - Medications must be stored separately from food and must be labeled accordingly. 1. Observation and interview on 8/27/24 at 11:46 A.M., of the medication room showed: - The medication refrigerator had at least 15 containers of applesauce and nine containers of Med Pass (oral nutritional supplement) and two small containers of tomato juice; - Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A said it was used for medication pass. During an interview on 8/29/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 42. Review of the facility's Labeling/Dating Foods policy, dated 2011, showed: -All foods stored will be properly labeled according to the following guidelines -Date marking for dry storage items: Unopened cases of dry food items will be dated with the date the case was received into the facility and will be using first in-first out method of rotation. Once a case is opened, the individual food items from the case are dated with the date the item was received into the facility and placed in/on the proper storage unit utilizing the first in-first out method of rotation. The Exception: to date individual dry storage items includes individually packaged food items stored in bulk containers such as packets of hot chocolate, tea bags, saltine crackers, packets of individual cookies, etc. The Dining Services Manager is to ensure that these bulk items are rotated with old items used first. New…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOUND CITY SNF OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2025 |
| STRAWBERRY FIELDS REIT LTD | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2025 |
| TIDE HEALTH GROUP LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2025 |
| BRUCE, LELAND | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2025 |
| GAYTAN, LUCY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2025 |
| HIXSON, BROOKE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2025 |
| RAMOS, BRIAN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2025 |
| THUET, DANIEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2025 |
| NAUMAN, JAMIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2025 |
| SYMONDS, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2025 |
| STRAWBERRY FIELDS REALTY LP | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2025 |
| 1531 NEBRASKA STREET LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2025 |
| STRAWBERRY FIELDS REIT INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/26/2026 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $121K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265746. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.