Lawrence County Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 46.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 67.4 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 0.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.07 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 0.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 0.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 0.45 on weekdays — 42% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.09 to 0.01 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 93% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents' environments were free of accident hazards when the facility failed to implement a process to ensure resident accessible hot water temperatures in all resident access areas were maintained at a safe temperature resulting in the hot water in 12 residents rooms (Resident #2, #12, #24, #25, #6, #68, #36, #34, #15, #44, #55, and #38) and a common bath/shower room to measure between 125.6 to 138 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The facility census was 70.The Administrator was notified on 08/08/25, at 1:55 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 08/05/25. The IJ was removed on 08/09/25 as confirmed by surveyor on-site verification. Review of the American Burn Association website, updated 2002, showed the following:-Hot water caused third degree burns (full thickness burns which go through the skin and affect deeper tissue resulting in white of blackened, charred skin) at the following temperatures and time parameters:-In…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible abuse were reported immediately to management and within two hours to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) when staff received allegations of possible physical abuse by staff involving one resident (Resident #1). Management and DHSS were not made aware of the allegation until the following day. The facility census was 66. Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, undated, showed the following:-The facility will ensure each resident is free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation;-Every staff member must immediately report any observed or suspected abuse of a resident by another staff member, resident, family member, or visitor;-The Director of Nursing (DON) will ensure all alleged violations are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made if the allegations involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury;-The DON will report to the Administrator of the facility and to other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely investigate an allegation of abuse and ensure protection of all residents during the investigation when after receiving an allegation of possible staff physical abuse involving one resident (Resident #1) the staff did not begin an investigation until the next day and allowed the staff member to continue to work with residents independently. The facility had a census of 66. Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, undated, showed the following:-The facility will ensure each resident is free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation;-The facility will take immediate action to prevent further potential violations of any resident right while the alleged violation is being investigated;-The facility will ensure that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated; -The Director of Nursing (DON) will immediately initiate an abuse incident report and begin investigation of alleged abuse;-The DON will prevent further potential abuse while the investigation is in progress;-Report the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, and accounting of all drugs when eight cards of narcotics for eight residents (Resident #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9 and #10) were found in the former Director of Nursing's (DON's) office desk. The facility census was 64.Review of a facility policy entitled Medications, Narcotics, undated, showed the following:-Narcotics will always be stored under a double lock system;-Each narcotic that the pharmacy dispenses to the facility is accompanied by a narcotic record;-Narcotics will be counted at the beginning and end of each shift by the nurse or CMT ending their shift and the nurse or CMT beginning the shift;-Discontinued narcotics must be pulled from the medication cart and placed in a locked box in the medication room with their narcotic sheets attachedReview of a facility policy entitled Medication Storage and Handling, undated, showed the following:-Medications will only be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from misappropriation of property when staff used one resident's (Resident #1) credit card without resident permission and when staff took money from one resident (Resident #2). The facility census was 64.Record review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, undated, defined exploitation as taking advantage of a resident for personal gain, through the use of manipulation, intimidation, threats, or coercion. The same facility policy defined misappropriation as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent.1. Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), completed 08/18/25, showed diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), schizophrenia (a serious mental health condition that affects…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare and distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards of practice and in a manner to prevent possible contamination when the facility staff failed to ensure all food items were properly labeled and sealed, failed to ensure expired foods were discarded, and failed to ensure the dishwasher washed and rinsed the dishes at the recommended temperatures. This had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 70 residents.1. Review of the 2022 Missouri Food Code showed food shall be protected from contamination by storing the food in a clean, dry location, and where it is not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination. Review of the facility policy titled, Date Marking and Food Storage Policy and Procedure. revised 09/19/24, showed the following: -All food stored for more than 24 hours will be properly identified and marked according to the following guidelines;-Unopened cases of dry food items will be dated with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse and neglect prevention policies, when they failed to complete an employee disqualification list (EDL - a list of individual prohibited from working in a long-term care facility in Missouri due to a finding of abuse or neglect) check and a check of the Nurse Aide (NA) Registry (a list checking for a Federal Indicator (a marker given to a potential employee who has committed abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property against residents) prohibiting them from working in a certified facility) for four staff members (Housekeeper (HK) S, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) T, Dietary Aide (DA) U, and Dietary [NAME] (DC) N) of ten sampled records. The facility census was 70.Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised April 2021, showed the facility will conduct employee background checks and not knowingly employ or otherwise engage any individual who has been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-13 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were appropriately screened prior to placement in a nursing home when the facility failed to obtain documentation of Preadmission Screenings and Resident Reviews (PASARR) for two residents (Resident #2 and #69). The facility census was 70.Review of the document the facility provided as their policy titled Missouri Department of Health & Senior Services Level One Form Training, dated 02/08/24, showed the following:-The PASARR process requires that all applicants to Medicaid-certified nursing facilities (regardless of whether their stay will be covered by private funds, Medicare, or Medicaid) be given a preliminary assessment to determine whether they might have a serious mental illness (SMI) or an intellectual disability (ID);-PASARR is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care;-All…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nutritional needs of all residents were met when staff failed to prepare pureed diets per approved recipes and failed to provide the approved serving size for pureed meals. The facility census was 70.Review of the facility policy titled, Puree Step by Step Guide, undated, showed the following:-Count items needed for puree as you are placing it into the food processor, and make two additional portions above your number of puree diets;-Gradually add hot liquid of choice with food to puree to a pudding like consistency (gravy/broth/hot milk-never use water);-Scrape sides of food processor and continue blending until there are no lumps/bumps in puree;-Use tongs to take blade out of food processor and use spatula to scrape product into serving pan;-Re-heat puree product in steam water bath on stove to 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or greater. 1. Review of the facility's recipe for pureed jambalaya showed the following:-Prepare according to the regular jambalaya recipe;-Blend until smooth and serve one cup…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standard and the resident's choices when the facility failed to follow-up regarding a cardiology referral for one resident (Resident #40), who had a pacemaker, in a timely manner. This would place the resident at an increased risk for a cardiac incident due to lack of oversite on his/her pacemaker. The facility census was 70.Review of the facility provided policy titled, Verbal Orders, revised February 2014, showed the following:-Verbal orders shall only be given in an emergency or when the attending physician is not immediately available to write or sign the order;-Verbal orders will always be based on verbal exchange with the prescribing practitioner or on approved written protocols;-Only authorized, licensed practitioners, or individuals authorized to take verbal orders from practitioners, shall be allowed to write orders in the medical record;-Verbal orders are those given by an authorized practitioner directly to a person authorized to receive and transcribe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility with the maximum practicable independence possible when staff failed to provide restorative nursing services three times weekly per the restorative therapy program for one resident (Resident #52). The facility census was 70.Review of the facility policy titled, Restorative Nursing Services, revised July 2017, showed the following:-Residents will receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence;-Restorative nursing care consists of nursing interventions that may or may not be accompanied by formalized rehabilitative services (e.g., physical, occupational, or speech therapies);-Residents may be started on a restorative nursing program upon admission, during the course of stay, or when discharged from rehabilitative care;-Restorative goals and objectives are individualized and resident-centered, and are outlined in the resident's plan of care;-The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,762 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,762 — penalty dated 2023-09-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO