Moore Few Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 60.5 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide protective oversight for residents when the facility did not have a policy and system in place to monitor residents who entered the enclosed courtyard during periods of increased temperature and humidity resulting in one resident (Resident #1) suffering non-responsiveness and sunburn from being outside for an extended period of time. The facility census was 60. The Administrator was notified on 08/03/23, of the Past Non-Compliance Immediate Jeopardy which occurred on 08/01/23. On 08/02/23, the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator reviewed the resident's charts, began an investigation, educated employees involved, in-serviced all facility staff, and began monitoring the daily temperatures to ensure resident safety when outdoors. The noncompliance was corrected on 08/02/23. Review showed the facility did not have a policy related to residents being out in heat or on the enclosed patio prior to 08/03/23. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (brief profile of resident) showed the following:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with standards of practice when staff failed to administer oxygen as ordered, failed to notify the physician of respiratory changes, and failed to create a timely comprehensive care plan that addressed oxygen usage for one residents (Resident #1). The resident went into respiratory distress and was sent to the emergency department. The facility census was 46. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding change of condition procedures. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding physician notification. 1. Review of the Resident #1's face sheet (brief look at resident information) showed the following information: -admission date of [DATE]; -Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe). Review of the resident's admission screening, dated [DATE], showed the following information: -Respiratory rate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-05-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain and effective pain management regimen when the facility failed to accurately assess, monitor, address, care plan, and notify the physician of increased and unrelieved pain for one resident (Resident #1) resulting in increased pain. The facility census was 46. Review of the facility policy titled, Pain Management Program, reviewed on 11/17/16, showed the following information: -The facility will assess all resident's on admission, quarterly, and as needed; -Complete pain assessment for all residents. Monitor for persistent as needed (PRN) medication use; -Assess pain presence, frequency, effect on function, and intensity; -Ask resident to rate pain using the pain scale; -Determine if staff assessment for pain is needed; -If staff assessment is needed, review indicators of pain or possible pain; -Based on pain assessment, initiate routine and PRN pain medication regimen or non-medication interventions; -Complete physician notification and reassess PRN. 1. Review of the Resident #1's face…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff adhered to the facility policy and standards of care for wearing the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for residents that had tested positive for COVID for four of four residents (Resident #95, #22, #94, and #144) observed for transmission-based precautions. Review of the facility's policy titled COVID-19, effective 09/19/23, showed the following: -Residents who test positive will be in a private rooms unless another resident is positive. In this case, cohorting will be permissible. Cohorting is not permissible for a positive resident and a presumptive resident. Movement outside the room will be extremely limited during quarantine period. -Staff will be required to wear full PPE including goggles, gloves, and N95 (K95) (filtration) masks when providing care or entering the room. Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) website titled, Interim Guidance for Managing Healthcare Personnel with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) Infection or Exposure to SARS-CoV-2, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for safety and physician orders obtained prior to self-administration of medication when one resident (Resident #28) had medications for self-administration at his/her bedside. Review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications, dated 02/2021, showed the following: -Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. -If it is deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications, this is documented in the medical record, and the care plan. -The decision that a resident can safely self-administer medications is re-assessed periodically based on changes in the resident's medical and/or decision making status. -Self-administered medications are stored in a safe and secure place, which is not accessible by other residents. 1. Review of Resident #28's admission Record, undated, located in the EMR under the Profile tab,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were as free from accident hazards as possible when staff failed to have an effective process in place to reduce the likelihood of residents burning themselves with hot liquids resulting in one resident (Resident #13) suffering a burn on his/her foot from hot chocolate and when the facility staff left a mechanical lift stored in a resident's room resulting in one resident (Resident #1) falling. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Safety of Hot Liquids, dated 10/2014, showed the following: -Residents will be evaluated for safety concerns and potential for injury from hot liquids upon admission, readmission and on change of condition; -Appropriate precautions will be implemented to maximize choice of beverages while minimizing the potential for injury; -The potential for burns from hot liquids is considered an ongoing concern among residents with weakened motor skills, balance issues, impaired cognition, and nerve or musculoskeletal conditions; -Once risk factors for injury from hot…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care per standards of practice when staff failed to ensure proper storage of oxygen/nebulizer supplies for two residents (Resident #3 and #28) of two residents reviewed for oxygen management out of a total sample of 16 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Therapy, dated 07/2023, showed staff to store cannulas and masks in plastic bags when not in use. Staff to change cannula, mask, tubing, and storage bag every seven days or as indicated. 1. Review of Resident #3's admission Record, undated, located under the ''Profile'' tab, showed the following; -admission date of 02/10/16; -Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (oxygen is insufficient at the tissue level). Review of the resident's annual ''Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff),'' located in the resident's EMR under the ''MDS'' tab, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/04/24, showed the resident had moderately impaired cognition.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all residents who wished to receive pneumococcal vaccines received them when staff failed to administer one pneumococcal vaccine to one resident (Resident #9) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. Review of the facility's policy titled Immunization Records, dated 07/2023, showed the following: -Adult pneumococcal recommendations if previous PPSV23 [pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine - Pneumovax 23] only administer PCV20 or PCV15. 1. Review of the Resident #9's admission Record, undated, located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR), under the Profile tab, showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Review of the resident's Vaccine Consent Form, dated 09/22/23, showed the requested vaccines included Pneumovax23 and Prevnar13 (pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) 13). Review of the resident's complete EMR showed the resident received the Pneumovax23 on 11/30/18, but had not received either the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all residents were kept free from possible accident hazards when the facility staff did not fully secure one resident (Resident #1) in a wheelchair during transport in the facility's van. The facility census was 53. On 03/05/24, at 3:00 P.M., the Interim Administrator and the Acting Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the Past Non-Compliance that occurred on 01/10/24. On 01/10/24, DON E notified the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) of the incident, began an investigation, educated the employees involved, and initiated a new competency checklist for all transportation drivers. The noncompliance was corrected on 01/12/24. Review showed the facility did not have a policy and procedure specific to transporting residents in the facility van. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (general resident profile information) showed the following: -admission date of 02/14/23; -Diagnoses included end stage renal disease (kidney failure), dependence on renal dialysis (manual filtering of waste products and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify one resident's (Resident #1's) responsible party in a timely manner after a change in health condition occurred. The facility census was 58. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding responsible party or family notification related to a resident change in condition. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (brief profile of resident) showed the following: -admission date of 02/14/19; -Resident had a responsible party and three emergency contacts listed; -Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (progressive disease involving damage to the sheaths of nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord, symptoms may include numbness, impairment of speech and of muscular coordination, blurred vision, and severe fatigue), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (lack of bladder control due to brain, spinal cord or nerve problems), polyneuropathy (nerves become damaged causing problems with sensation, coordination, or other body functions), and chronic pain. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 01/20/23, showed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-08-04 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for facility residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies as required. The facility had a census of 60. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy pertaining to a process to complete a facility assessment. 1. Review of the facility's Resident Census and Condition Form, updated 08/11/23, showed a census of 60 and the following resident characteristics: -Sixteen residents dependent on staff for transferring; -Fifteen residents dependent on staff for toilet use; -Eight residents with an indwelling catheter (tubing to drain the bladder); -Thirty-one residents with documented signs and symptoms of depression; -Twenty-nine residents with documented psychiatric diagnosis (excluding dementias and depression); -Two residents with behavioral healthcare needs; -Two resident receiving renal dialysis (mechanical filtering of the blood to remove waste); -Two residents requiring ostomy (allows bodily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-08-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan, that includes measurable objectives to meet the resident's medical and nursing needs identified in the comprehensive assessment, for four residents (Residents #24,#25, #31, and #95). The facility census was 42. Record review of the facility's policy entitled MDS and Care Plan Policy, reviewed 2/20/2012, showed the following information: -The purpose of this policy is to initially and periodically conduct a comprehensive, accurate, standardized, reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacity, to provide the facility with the information necessary to develop a care plan and to provide the appropriate care and services for each resident; -The facility will adhere to the guidelines for resident assessment consistent with the requirements for the Resident Assessment Instrument; -The Comprehensive Assessment: -Will describe both the resident's capability to perform…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases when the facility failed to follow their policy and infection control practices when staff did not ensure staff completed and read employee tuberculosis (TB - a potentially serious infectious bacterial disease that mainly affects the lungs) screening tests timely on hire for four staff members. The facility census was 42. Record review of the facility's policy Tuberculosis, Employee Screening, dated July 2010, showed the following: -The oversight of the TB monitoring will be designated to one person; -All employees shall be screened for TB infection and disease using a two-step tuberculin skin test (TST) or blood assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and symptom screening, prior to beginning employment; -Each newly hired employee will be screened for TB infection and disease after an employment offer has been made, but prior to the employee's duty assignment; -The initial TB testing will be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $89K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO