Abbey Senior Health

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 272 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 49.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 50.4 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.94 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.99 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure seven residents (Resident (R) 3, R207, R27, R31, R22, R39, R52, and R40) of 24 sampled residents remained free of accidents/hazards and received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. The facility failed to ensure coffee that was accessible to residents and served to residents was within a safe temperature range. On [DATE], R3 spilled coffee on her lap resulting in blisters on both sides of her inner thigh, and on [DATE], R40 spilled coffee on his lap. The Director of Nursing (DON) failed to ensure R207, R27, R31, R22, R39 and R52, who had falls, lacked adequate supervision, a comprehensive fall investigation after each fall, and remained free from injury. Findings include: 1. The policy titled Safety of Hot Liquids revised 10/2014 revealed resident will be evaluated for safety concerns and potential for injury from hot liquids upon admission, readmission and on change of condition. Appropriate precautions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-11 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to communicate transfers and/or discharges to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (a trained advocate, often a volunteer, who works to protect the rights and improve the quality of life for residents in long-term care facilities, such as nursing homes and assisted living facilities) for three residents (Resident #44, #70 and #34), in a review of 14 sampled residents, and for two discharged residents (Residents #4 and #38). The facility census was 49. Review of the undated facility policy, Transfer and Discharge from the Facility, showed the following:-The facility forwards a copy of all discharge notices to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman;A. Facility staff will document in the residents' record:iv. Date copy of the notice was sent to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman per requirements.1. Review of email communication from the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, dated 06/05/26 at 4:14 P.M. and 06/08/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1), in a review of five sampled residents, remained free from misappropriation of property. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA C) took the resident's wallet containing cash and the resident's debit card without the resident's knowledge or permission and used the debit card to pay Instant Credit Auto $450.00 (loan company for car loans), Spectrum (an internet and cable provider) $378.00 and $139.29 at Five Below (a retail store). The facility census was 53. On 9/11/25 at 12:30 P.M. the administrator was notified of the past non-compliance which occurred on 9/5/25. On 9/8/25, the administrator became aware of the violation of misappropriation of the resident's debit card and cash by CNA C when the resident logged onto his/her bank account and found the money had been withdrawn from the account. CNA C was an agency aide, and the agency was notified on 9/8/25 that the aide could not return to the facility. Staff were in-serviced on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident # 1 ) in a review of eleven residents was free from verbal and mental abuse when Dietary Aide E threw a ceramic dinner plate towards the resident, hitting the wall behind the resident, shattering the plate and called the resident a fucking bitch. The facility census was 50. On 12/19/24 at 11:00 A.M. the administrator was notified of the past non-compliance which occurred on 12/15/24. On 12/15/24 the administrator identified Dietary Aide E verbally and physically abused Resident #1. Upon discovery, staff suspended Dietary Aide E, conducted an investigation and notified appropriate parties. Staff reviewed the abuse and neglect policies, and all facility staff was educated on the facility abuse and neglect policies. Dietary Aide E was terminated. The deficiency was corrected on 12/16/24. Review of the facility abuse policy, dated July 2017, showed the following: -It was the policy of the facility that all residents are to be free from abuse or neglect of a physical, emotional, verbal or sexual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food to residents in a safe and sanitary manner when staff failed to employ proper hand hygiene and gloving practices and failed to store food in a manner that prevented potential contamination. Staff failed to ensure beverage and ice machines were clean and an air gap was present at ice machine drains. Staff failed to document and demonstrate knowledge of the use and testing parameters of the facility's dishwashing machines to ensure dishes were cleaned and sanitized properly. The facility census was 49. Review of the facility policy, Food and Nutrition Services Staff, revised November 2022, showed the following: -Food and nutrition services staff should wash their hands before serving food to residents; -Employees should wash their hands after collecting soiled plates and food waste and prior to handling food trays; -Bare hand contact with food is prohibited; -Gloves are worn when handling food directly and changed between tasks. Review of the undated facility policy, Procedures…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0572 — pattern
  Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were aware of posted resident rights in an easily accessible area for review at their leisure. The resident census was 49. Review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights, revised February 2021 showed the following: -Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of the facility; -These rights include the resident's right to: -Communication with and access to people and services, both inside and outside the facility; -Be informed about his or her rights and responsibilities; -Communicate with outside agencies (e.g., local, state, or federal officials, state and federal surveyors, state long-term care ombudsman, protection or advocacy organizations, etc.) regarding any matter; -Copies of resident rights are posted throughout the facility. During group interview, on 10/23/24 at 10:02 A.M., seven of seven residents said they did not know where the resident rights were posted in the facility. Observation on 10/23/24 at 10:45 A.M., showed the resident rights posted along…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0574 — pattern
  The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident rights when the facility did not provide accessible information regarding the State Long Term Care Ombudsman program and the State Survey Agency in a location that was readily accessible and could be read by residents in the facility without assistance. The facility census was 49. Review of the facility's policy, Filing Grievance/Complaints, revised April 2017, showed the following: -Residents and their representatives have the right to file a grievance, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff or the agency designated to hear grievances (e.g. the State Ombudsman); -A copy of the grievance/complaint procedure is posted on the resident bulleting board. During group interview, on 10/23/24 at 10:02 A.M., seven of seven residents said the following: -They knew what the Ombudsman program was but was unaware of who their representative was or how to contact them; -They did not know how to contact the State Survey Agency if they had any concerns. Observation on 10/23/24 at 10:45 A.M.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff safely transported residents in wheelchairs for four residents (Residents #26, #27, #25, and #4), in review of 19 sampled residents, and for two additional residents (Residents #11 and #40). The census was 49. During an interview on 11/05/24 at 10:19 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the facility did not currently have a policy for transporting residents in wheelchairs or the use of wheelchair foot rests. 1. Review of Resident #26's undated face sheet showed the resident's diagnoses included difficulty in walking, unsteadiness on feet, psychoactive substance-induced sleep disorder, history of falls, major depression, anxiety disorder, and mild cognitive impairment. Review of the resident's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 09/25/24, showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Impaired range of motion to one side of the lower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure bed rails assessments were consistent with facility policy to evaluate the resident's risk for entrapment and failed to conduct ongoing assessments to ensure the proper use and safety of the bed rails for eight residents (Residents #12, #102, #24, #25, #23, #207, #4 and #45), in a review of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 49. Review of the facility policy, Bed Safety and Bed Rails, revised on August 2022, showed the following: -Bed rails are adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed. They are available in a variety of types, shapes, and sizes ranging from full to one-half, one- quarter, or one-eighth lengths. Some bed rails are not designed as part of the bed by the manufacturer and may be installed on or used along the side of a bed. For the purpose of this policy bed rails include: side rails, safety rails, and grab/assist bars; -The use of bed rails or side rails (including temporarily raising…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner to prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections for eight residents (Residents #24, #12, #39, #27, #102, #103, #202, and #42), in a review of 20 sampled residents. Staff failed to failed to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during personal care for three residents (Residents #24, #12, and #39) who had urinary catheters (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine); failed to maintain a system to ensure one resident's (Resident #24's) urinary catheter tubing and dignity bag (containing the urinary drainage bag) were kept off the floor; failed to utilize proper handwashing and gloving when providing incontinence care to one resident (Resident #27); failed to ensure nebulizer masks (mask used to administer breathing treatments) and CPAP (a method of respiratory therapy in which air is pumped into the lungs through the nose or nose and mouth during spontaneous breathing, used in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete inspection of bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for eight residents (Resident #12, #102, #24, #25, #23, #207, #4 and #45), in a review of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 49. Review of the facility policy, Bed Safety and Bed Rails, revised on August 2022, showed the following: -Resident beds meet the safety specifications established by the Hospital Bed Safety Workgroup; -Bed frames, mattresses and bed rails are checked for compatibility and size prior to use; -Regardless of mattress type, width, length, and/or depth, the bed frame, bed rail and mattress will leave no gap wide enough to entrap a resident's head or body. Any gaps in the bed system are within the safety dimensions established by the FDA; -Maintenance staff routinely inspects all beds and related equipment to identify risks and problems including potential entrapment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO