Garden View Care Center
700 Garden Path, O Fallon, MO 63366 · For profit - Corporation · 80 certified beds · (636) 240-2840 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606) — most recent Nov 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 26.0% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.5% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.9% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.6% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.4% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 10.3% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.5% | 17.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.6% | 25.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.8% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.9% | 4.5% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 33.9% | 17.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 31.5% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.8% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.4% | 63.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 37.2% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.5% | 13.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.50 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.17 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.2%CMS range 28.2–48.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.8%CMS range 6.8–19.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 90.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 3.8–13.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.98 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 53.6 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.37 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.92 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of one resident (Resident #1) with a history of falls, in a review of five sampled residents, when staff did not routinely check on the resident at least every two hours per the facility's expectations throughout the night. On the morning of 5/30/26, staff found the resident on the floor in his/her room with the door closed for an undetermined amount of time with dried blood on his/her hair, face, and hands. The resident was admitted to the hospital following evaluation. The resident remained in the hospital for four days with discharge diagnoses of traumatic hematoma (collection of pooled, clotted blood that forms outside of a blood vessel, usually caused by injury or trauma) of head and traumatic rhabdomyolysis (a serious medical condition where severe physical injury causes skeletal muscles to rapidly breakdown). The facility census was 84. On 07/01/26 at 01:40 P.M., the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-06-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #22), in a review of fifteen sampled residents, remained free from verbal abuse, when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) U used curse words directed toward and within hearing distance of the resident. CNA U's language made the resident feel hurt and abused. The resident was tearful after the incident. The facility census was 29. The facility learned of the allegation of staff to resident abuse when staff reported the concern on 06/14/23. Administration suspended CNA U pending the investigation. The facility reported the incident to DHSS timely and conducted a thorough investigation, speaking with residents and staff and later terminated CNA U's employment. All staff were in-serviced regarding abuse, neglect and professionalism on 06/14/23. Interviews with staff confirmed the in-service education provided. The noncompliance was corrected on 06/14/23. Review of facility policy, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation-Reporting & Response, revised, November 2018, showed residents have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four residents (Resident #7, Resident #2, Resident #5 and Resident #10), in a review of eleven sampled residents, were free from sexual abuse. Resident #11 demonstrated a pattern of sexual behaviors with residents without the capacity to consent to sexual activity. Staff found Resident #11 in Resident #7's room with his/her hands down Resident #7's pants and in the resident's perineal area, Resident #11 touched and rubbed Resident #2's breasts, kissed Resident #5 on the mouth twice, and grabbed Resident #10 by his/her hands, pulled the resident to him/her and groped his/her breast. The facility census was 70. Review of the undated facility policy, Abuse Prevention Program, showed the following:-Policy Statement: Residents have the right to be free from abuse. This includes, but is not limited to, freedom from sexual abuse;-Policy Interpretation and Implementation: As part of the resident abuse prevention, the administration will:-Protect residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of sexual abuse to the state agency for three residents (Resident #2, Resident #5, and Resident #10), in a review of 11 sampled residents when staff witnessed and documented sexual abuse. Resident #11 demonstrated a pattern of sexual abuse behaviors with residents without the capacity to consent to sexual activity. Staff witnessed Resident #11 rub Resident #2's breasts, kiss Resident #5 on the mouth twice, and grab Resident #10 by his/her hands, pull the resident to him/her and grope the resident's breast. Further review showed the facility did not report these incidents to the resident representatives for Resident #2, #5 or #10 as facility policy directed. The facility census was 70. Review of the undated facility policy, Abuse Prevention Program, showed the following:-Report any allegations of abuse within timeframes as required by federal requirements;-The Administrator has the overall responsibility for the coordination and implementation of our facility's abuse prevention program policies and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report allegations of physical abuse of one resident (Resident #1), to the state agency in a review of four sampled residents. The facility census was 73. Review of the facility policy for Freedom from Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation - Investigation and Reported dated 11/2024 showed the following: -At the facility all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and /or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported; -The facility will not condone any form of resident abuse or neglect. To aide in abuse prevention, all personnel are to report any signs and symptoms of abuse/neglect to their supervisor or to the Director of Nursing Service immediately; -All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of an unknown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a timely and thorough investigation when one resident (Resident #1), in the review of four sampled residents, made an allegation of physical abuse. The resident said he/she was being hit by a young person (specified gender). The facility identified a staff member, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A, who met the general description that the resident provided. The facility failed to protect the resident when CNA A continued to work after the allegation of physical abuse was made. The facility census was 73 . Review of the facility policy for Freedom from Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation - Investigation and Reported dated 11/2024 showed the following: -At the facility all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and /or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be thoroughly investigated by facility management; -The facility will protect residents from harm, reprisal, discrimination or coercion during investigations of abuse allegations; -If an incident or suspected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1), with diagnosis of major depressive disorder, recurrent severe without psychotic features, generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder, in a review of four sampled residents, who had a significant history of past trauma, received care planned interventions to address the resident's trauma to ensure the resident attained the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being, when the resident began to exhibit increased paranoia and saying someone had been hitting him/her. The facility census was 73 Review of the facility policy for Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring with a revision date of 3/2024 showed the following: -The facility will provide and residents will receive behavioral health services as needed to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care; -New onset or changes in behavior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained areas throughout the kitchen in a clean and sanitary manner, failed to ensure ice machines in the kitchen and nourishment centers were clean and in good repair, failed to ensure staff properly wore hair and beard restraints while in the kitchen, and failed to cover food/drink items when transporting meal trays to residents' rooms. The facility census was 48. 1. Review of the facility policy, Sanitation, dated November 2024, showed the following: -All utensils, counters, shelves and equipment shall be kept clean and maintained in good repair; -Kitchen surfaces not in contact with food shall be cleaned on a regular schedule and frequently enough to prevent accumulation of grime; -The food services manager would be responsible for scheduling staff for regular cleaning of kitchen and dining areas. Review of the facility policy, Food Receiving and Storage, dated July 2024, showed all foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated (use by date). Observations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff washed their hands after each direct resident contact and when indicated by professional standard of practice during personal care for four residents (Residents #1, #4, #6, and #11), in a review of 14 sampled residents. The facility failed to complete Tuberculin Skin Tests (TST) and/or annual evaluations as required to rule out Tuberculosis (TB) (a communicable disease that affects the lungs characterized by fever, cough, and difficulty breathing) for three of ten new employees reviewed (Registered Nurse I, Laundry Staff J and Dietary Staff K). The facility failed to monitor cold water temperatures as part of their water management program to prevent the growth of water borne pathogens including Legionella. The facility census was 48. Review of the facility policy, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, last revised in November 2024, showed the following: -The facility considered hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for incontinence care for one resident (Resident #1) and failed to provide oral care for one resident (Resident #29), in a review of 14 sampled residents, who required assistance to perform activities of daily living. The facility census was 48. Review of the facility's policy, Oral Care, dated October 2024, showed the purpose of the procedure was to clean and freshen the resident's mouth, to prevent infections of the mouth, to maintain the teeth and gums in a healthy condition, to stimulate the gums, and to remove food particles from between the teeth. (The policy did not include documentation to show when staff were to assist with oral care.) Review of the facility's policy, Perineal Care, dated November 2024, showed the purpose of the procedure was to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infections and skin irritation, and to observe the resident's skin condition. (The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety by failure to transfer one resident (Resident #1) as directed in his/her plan of care and failed to follow facility fall policy and procedure following one resident's fall (Resident #12) or implement interventions in the resident's plan of care to prevent further falls in a review of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 48. Review of the facility's policy, Gait Belt Use/Transfers, dated November 2024, showed the following: -The facility will take all measures to ensure resident safety; -Transfers are performed based upon resident transfer status and the facility's policy; -Gait belts should be placed around the resident's waist, above the pelvic bone and below the rib cage over top of clothing; -A gait belt should be adjusted so that it is snug, without being uncomfortable for the resident; -Verify proper closure of buckle before use; -Grasp/transfer belt from underneath; -Remove/loosen gait belt when not in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly store, change and date respiratory equipment (oxygen tubing) for two residents (Residents #4 and #39), in a review of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 48. During an interview on 01/23/25 at 10:59 A.M., the administrator said the facility did not have a policy for changing and dating oxygen (O2) tubing. 1. Review of Resident #4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument, completed by facility staff, dated 10/10/24, showed the following: -Cognitively intact; -Used oxygen. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 10/17/24 showed the following: -Oxygen for for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (lung disorder that blocks airflow), history of pneumonia and respiratory failure; -Oxygen via nasal prongs (nasal cannula (NC) (prongs that are inserted into the nares to deliver oxygen) at one-two liters (L) as needed (PRN); -The care plan did not direct staff to change or date the O2 tubing. Review of the resident progress notes dated 11/10/24, showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired testing supplies and medications not in use by two residents including one current resident Resident #10) and one discharged resident (Residents #100), were destroyed or returned as directed by facility policy. The facility census was 48. Review of the facility's policy, Storage of Medications, last revised [DATE], showed the following: -The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner; -The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. 1. Review of Resident #100's physician orders, dated [DATE], showed an order for fluticasone-salmeterol (a combination of two medicines that are used to help control the symptoms of asthma and improve breathing) aerosol powder breath activated 250-50 microgram (mcg)/dose, one inhalation - inhale orally every 12 hours (original order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure staff responded timely to reports of pests in the building. The facility census was 48. Review of the facility's policy, Pest Control, revised May 2024, showed the following: -The facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure the building is kept free of insects and rodents; -Pest control services are provided by the pest control service/vendor; -Maintenance services assist, when appropriate and necessary, in providing pest control services. Review of the facility's policy, Sanitation, revised November 2024, showed all kitchens, kitchen areas and dining areas shall be kept clean, free from litter and rubbish and protected from rodents, roaches, flies and other insects. 1. Review of the pest control company's service summary report, dated 12/31/24, showed the company treated the exterior of the facility for rodents and ants. Observation on 1/13/25 at 2:30 P.M. showed a light brown insect crawled along the wall by the heated carts, located in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess residents for risk of entrapment prior to placement of bed rails, document alternatives attempted prior to bed rail placement, complete entrapment zone measurements, or obtain written consent from the residents and/or their guardians prior to use for one resident (Residents #11), who used side rails, in a review of 14 sampled residents. The census was 48. Review of the facility's Bed Safety /Bed Rails policy, last revised in July 2024, showed the following: -The facility shall strive to provide a safe sleeping environment for the resident and after evaluation, if need be, appropriate bed rails will be used for bed mobility as necessary: -The resident's sleeping environment should be assessed by the Nursing Supervisor/ Administrator/ DON (interdisciplinary team), considering the resident's safety, medical conditions, comfort, and freedom of movement, as well as input from the resident and family regarding previous sleeping habits and bed environment; -The facility will attempt to utilize appropriate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete inspections of bed frames, mattresses and bed rails, as part of a regular maintenance program, to identify areas of possible entrapment for one resident (Resident #11), in a review of 14 sampled who used bed rails/assist bars. The facility census was 48. Review of the facility's Bed Safety /Bed Rails policy, last revised in July, 2024, showed the following: -The facility shall strive to provide a safe sleeping environment for the resident and after evaluation, if need be, appropriate bed rails will be used for bed mobility as necessary; -To try to prevent injuries from the use of bed rails and related equipment, the facility should promote the following approaches: -The maintenance department will complete an inspection on bed rail and bed components routinely and should provide a copy of inspections to the Administrator. These inspections will be incorporated into Safety Committee; -Ongoing evaluation of resident and bed rails will occur to assess the ongoing need for use of bed rails and resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-23 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — widespreadNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure individuals employed by the facility did not have a federal indicator for misconduct. Review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B's employee file showed he/she had a federal indicator for misconduct. LPN B was employed by the facility as a charge nurse with access to all residents. The facility census was 29. Review of the facility policy, Background Screening Investigation, revised November 2015, showed the following: -Our facility conducts employment background screening checks, reference checks and criminal conviction investigation checks on direct access employees; -For the purposes of this policy direct access employee means any individual who has access to a resident or patient of a long term care facility or provider through employment or through a contract and has duties that involve (or may involve) one-on-one contact with a patient or resident of the facility or provider, as determined by the State for purposes of the National Background Check Program; -The Personnel/Human Resources Director, or other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a policy and procedure to address reviewing the state Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Registry for all new employees. This has the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The facility census was 29. Review of the facility policy, Background Screening Investigation, revised November 2015, showed the following: -For any individual applying for a position as a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), the state nurse aide registry will be contract to determine if any findings of abuse, neglect, mistreatment of individuals, and/or theft of property have been entered into the applicant's file. Review of the facility policy showed it did not include that all individuals employed by the facility will be checked against the state nurse aide registry. During an interview on 07/11/23 at 11:26 A.M., the Administrator said she was aware that the policy did not instruct for the CNA registry check to be completed on all new hires, including any potential non-CNA staff.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when it failed to appropriately store and handle food products to maintain quality and free from potential contaminants, and label and date opened food items. The facility also failed to ensure dietary equipment was free of an accumulation of grease, dust and debris. The total facility census was 60 and the certified census was 29. Review of the facility's policy, Preventing Foodborne Illness, Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices, revised October 2017, showed the following: -Food and nutrition services employees will follow appropriate hygiene and sanitary procedures to prevent the spread of foodborne illness; -Employees must wash their hands after handling soiled equipment or utensils, during food preparation as often as necessary to remove soil and contamination and to prevent cross contamination when changing tasks; -Gloves are considered single-use items and must be discarded after completing the task for which they are used.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an antibiotic stewardship program as a part of their infection prevention and control program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. The facility census was 29. Review of the facility policy, Antibiotic Stewardship, dated December 2018, showed the following: -The facility would educate and train staff and practitioners about the antibiotic stewardship program, including appropriate prescribing, monitoring, and surveillance of antibiotic use and outcomes. Antibiotic usage and outcome data would be collected and documented using a facility approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. The data would be used to guide decisions for improvement of individual resident antibiotic prescribing practices and facility-wide antibiotic stewardship; -As part of the program, all clinical infections treated with antibiotics would undergo review by the director of nursing (DON); -The designee would review antibiotic utilization as part of the antibiotic stewardship program and identify…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-23 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a qualified individual(s) onsite who was responsible for implementing programs and activities to prevent and control infections. The facility census was 29. Review of the facility's Infection Preventionist policy, dated 12/2018, showed the following: -The Infection Preventionist is responsible for coordinating the implementation and updating of our established infection and prevention and control policies and procedures; -The Infection Preventionist will collect, analyze and provide infection and antibiotic usage data and trends to nursing staff and health practitioners; consult on infection risk assessment and prevention control strategies; provide education and training; and implement evidenced-based infection prevention and control practices. During an interview on 06/23/23 at 10:30 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the following: -She was employed as the Director of Nursing in January 2023; -The Administrator and DON work together on the Infection Control and Prevention Program; -Neither one had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow policies and procedures for immunization of residents against pneumococcal disease. The facility failed to offer and vaccinate nine eligible residents (Resident #24, #5, #8, #18, #19, #13, #17, #3, and #4), in a review of 15 sampled residents, and 10 additional residents (Resident #501, #21, #504, #6, #2, #15, #16, #12, #20 and #503) with the recommended doses of the pneumococcal vaccine as indicated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations. The facility also failed to ensure the facility policy followed current CDC guidelines for pneumococcal vaccine administration. The facility census was 29. Review of the undated facility policy for Influenza/Pneumococcal Vaccines showed the following: -It is the facility's policy that residents will receive the vaccinations listed below, unless documentation can be provided showing that he/she has received them within the appropriate time frame allowed for each vaccination;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that enhanced resident dignity for four residents (Resident #1, #9 #13, and #24), in a review of 15 sampled residents. Staff stood while assisting three residents (Residents #1, #9, and #13) to eat in the dining room, and did not answer one resident's (Resident #24's) call light promptly, causing the resident to be incontinent. The facility census was 29. Review of the facility policy, Answering the Call Light, revised October 2010, showed the policy directed staff to answer a resident's call light as soon as possible. Review of the facility's Assistance with Meals policy, dated December 2018, showed residents who cannot feed themselves shall be fed with attention to safety, comfort and dignity. This includes not not standing over resident while assisting them with meals. 1. Review of Resident #24's care plan, dated 01/25/23, showed the following: -The resident requires assist with activities of daily living…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-23 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to create an environment respectful of the rights of each resident to make choices about significant aspects of their lives for two residents (Residents #3 and #24) in a review of 15 sampled residents, when staff woke residents according to staff preference or based off of a get up list. The facility census was 29. Review of the facility's admission agreement form, residents' rights and responsibilities, dated 4/20/21, showed the following: -Rights to freedom from control; -Residents shall not have their personal lives regulated or controlled beyond reasonable adherence to meal schedules and other written policies which may be necessary for the orderly management of the facility. 1. Review of Resident #24's care plan, dated 01/25/23, showed the following: -The resident requires assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) related to stroke with left side paralysis. Resident is able to make needs known; -Requires one assist to transfer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's choice of code status was consistent throughout the resident's medical record and the Outside The Hospital Do-Not-Resuscitate (OHDNR) Order form was completed for three residents (Resident #1, #13, and #16), in a review of 15 sampled residents. Also, staff responsible for the care of one resident (Resident #11) did not accurately review the resident's chart to ensure the proper code status and two other care staff did not know where a resident's code status would be located. The facility census was 29. Review of the facility policy, Advanced Directives, dated 12/2018, showed the following: -Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advance directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical record; -The plan of care for each resident will be consistent with his or her documented treatment preferences and/or advanced directives. 1. Record review of Resident #1's (OHDNR) form, undated, showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for incontinence care for three residents (Resident #3, #4, and #17), in a review of 15 sampled residents, who required assistance to perform activities of daily living. The facility census was 29. Review of the facility policy, Perineal Care, dated 12/2018, showed the following: -The purpose of this procedure is to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infections and skin irritation, and to observe the resident's skin condition; -Review the resident's care plan for any special needs of the resident. 1. Review of Resident #17's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 04/22/23, showed the following: -The resident had short and long term memory loss; -He/She did not reject care; -He/She was incontinent of bladder and bowel. Review of the resident's care plan, last updated 04/26/23, showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to reposition three residents (Resident #3, #4, and #17), in a review of 15 sampled residents, who were at risk for developing pressure ulcers. The facility's census was 29. Review of the facility's repositioning policy, dated May 2013 showed the following: -The purpose was to provide guidelines for the evaluation of resident repositioning needs, to aid in the development of an individualized care plan for repositioning, to promote comfort for all bed or chair-bound residents and prevent skin breakdown, promote circulation, and provide pressure relief for residents; -Review the resident's care plan to evaluate for any special needs; -Repositioning is a common, effective intervention for preventing skin breakdown, promoting circulation, and providing pressure relief; -Repositioning was critical for a resident who was immobile or dependent upon staff for repositioning; -Check the resident's care plan, assignment sheet, or the communication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet residents' needs including toileting, meal assistance and supervision for five residents (Resident #2, #24, #1, #13, and #17), in a review of 15 sampled residents on a secured dementia unit. The facility census was 29. Review of the facility policy, Staffing, revised April 2007 showed the following: -Our facility provides adequate staffing to meet needed care and services for our resident population; -Our facility maintains adequate staffing on each shift to ensure that our residents' need and services are met. Licensed registered nursing and licensed nursing staff are available to provide and monitor the delivery of resident care services; -Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) are available on each shift to provide the needed care and services of each resident as outlines on the resident's comprehensive care plan; -Other support services (e.g. dietary, activities/recreational, social, therapy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication carts and treatment cart were secured when unattended. The facility census was 29. Review of the facility policy, Storage of Medications, dated 12/2018 showed the following: -The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner; -Nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe and sanitary manner. Observation on 06/23/23 at 8:22 A.M., at the C wing nurses station, showed the following: -The medication cart sat at the nurses station unlocked; -The treatment cart sat across from the nurses station unlocked. The cart contained multiple tubes of prescription ointments/creams/medications; -A housekeeper walked by the medication cart; -The medication cart contained a narcotic box, three bottles of Atropine (medication used to dry up secretions), and multiple insulin pens. Observation on 06/23/23 at 8:35 A.M., at the C wing nurses station, showed the following: -The medication cart sat at the nurses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff washed their hands after each direct resident contact and when indicated by professional standard of practice during personal care for three residents (Resident #1, #2, and #4) in a review of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 29. Review of the facility policy, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, dated 08/2015, showed the following: -Wash hands with soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water for the following situations: -Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or, alternatively, soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water for the following situations: a. Before and after direct contact with residents; b. Before performing any non-surgical invasive procedures; c. Before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during resident care; d. After contact with a resident's intact skin; e. After contact with blood or bodily fluids; f. After handling used dressings, contaminated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-23 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide required in-service training for nurse aides that included dementia management training as part of the required minimum 12 hours of training per year. The facility census was 29. Review of the facility assessment dated [DATE] showed the following: -Required in-service training for certified nurse assistants CNAs must be sufficient to ensure that continuing competence of nurse aides, but must be no less than 12 hours per year; -Include dementia management training and other individuals with cognitive impairments; -For nurse aides providing services to individuals with cognitive impairments, also address the care of the cognitively impaired. During an interview on 6/23/23 at 9:05 A.M., Activity Aide N said the following: -He/She worked at the facility for four years; -He/She went to dementia care lectures and training, but the last one was prior to COVID-19 (Coronavirus pandemic) restrictions. During an interview on 06/23/23 at 9:15 A.M., CNA I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate use of a gait belt for two residents (Resident #1 and #13), in a sample of 15 residents, when staff pivot transferred the residents. The facility census was 29. The facility did not provide a policy for gait belt use or resident transfers. 1. Review of Resident #1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 04/05/23, showed the following: -The resident had short and long term memory problems; -He/She required extensive assistance of two staff members for transfers; -He/She had diagnoses of dementia, seizure disorder, traumatic brain injury, and post-concussional syndrome (when concussion symptoms last months or even a year or more after initial injury that affect how the body and brain function, as well as how a person experiences emotions). Review of the resident's care plan, dated 04/11/23, showed the following: -The resident required assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices in the kitchen. The total facility census was 73. 1. Observation on 9/10/19 at 10:42 A.M. showed the external thermometer of the three-door freezer showed a temperature of 0 degrees Fahrenheit (F) while the interior thermometer showed a temperature of +10 degrees F. Observations on 9/10/19 between 2:49 P.M. and 3:22 P.M. showed the three-door freezer had not been opened. At 3:22 P.M., the exterior thermometer read 0 degrees F and a calibrated thermometer was placed inside the freezer. Observations on 9/10/19 between 3:22 P.M. and 3:32 P.M. showed the freezer door had not been opened. At 3:32 P.M. the external thermometer of the freezer read 0 degrees F and the calibrated thermometer inside the freezer showed +10 degrees F. The facility's internal thermometer was not observed in the freezer at this time. Further observation showed the freezer held potentially hazardous food items such as, fish, ground beef, sausage, bacon, beef patties, chicken breast, chicken strips, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided three residents (Residents #3, #10 and #16), who were unable to perform their own activities of daily living, in a review of 12 sampled, the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene and prevent body odor. The total facility census was 73 with a certified census of 24. 1. Review of the facility's policy, Perineal Care, dated December 2018, showed the following: -The purpose of this procedure are to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infections and skin irritation and to observe the resident's skin condition; -For a female resident: wet washcloth and apply soap or skin cleansing agent. Separate labia and wash area downward from front to back. Continue to wash the perineum moving from inside outward to and including thighs, alternating from side to side, and using downward strokes. Do not reuse the same washcloth or water to clean the urethra or labia. Rinse perineum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all medications in locked compartments when staff left the medication carts unlocked and left the medication keys unattended on top of the medication cart. The total facility census was 73 with a certified census of 24. 1. Review of the facility's policy, Security of Medication Cart, dated December 2018, showed the following: -The medication cart shall be secured during medication passes to ensure medications are kept in a controlled environment, to restrict access by unauthorized personnel/residents, and to maintain resident safety; -The nurse must secure the medication cart during the medication pass to prevent unauthorized entry; -Medication carts are to be kept locked when not in use, or when not in direct line of sight of staff members; -Schedule II controlled substances must be stored behind two locks, requiring two separate keys to open. 2. Review of the Certified Medication Technician Student Manual, 2008 revision, showed the following: -Access control - access should be limited to persons…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-09-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff served meals to meet residents' needs by not serving correct portion sizes of protein to residents on a mechanical soft diet. The total facility census was 73. Review of a list of residents and their physician-ordered diets, provided by the facility, showed 12 residents had physician orders for mechanical soft diets. Review of the facility's menu for the lunch meal on 9/10/19 showed residents on a mechanical soft diet were to receive ground pork steak. During interview on 9/10/19 at 10:42 A.M., the dietary supervisor said there are no spreadsheets to show serving sizes. Observation on 9/10/19 at 12:10 P.M. showed Dietary Aide W prepared six plates for residents on a mechanical soft diet. He/she used a pair of tongs to place an unmeasured amount of ground pork steak onto each of the plates. During interview on 9/11/19 at 2:40 P.M., Dietary Supervisor said he expected staff to use a 3 ounce scoop, spoodle, or ladle to serve mechanical soft protein. He would not expect to see tongs used for mechanical soft because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report two allegations of resident to resident physical abuse to the state survey agency for one resident (Resident #13), in a review of 12 sampled residents. The facility's total census was 73, with a certified census of 24. 1. Review of the facility policy Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Reporting and Response, dated December 2018, showed the following: -Abuse allegations (abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property) are reported per Federal and State Law; -The facility will ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made; -If the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-09-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standards of nursing practice for one resident (Resident #18), in a review of 12 sampled residents. Nursing staff mixed a prescription cream with a barrier cream, placed the cream in the resident's room for certified nursing assistants (CNAs) to apply to the resident's skin. The nursing staff documented their initials on the treatment record (indicating they had applied the medication) when the CNAs applied the cream to the resident's skin. The facility did not have a policy to direct staff on how to properly mix the medication. The facility also failed to administer liquid medication to one resident (Resident #6) in a manner that would ensure an accurate dose of the ordered medication. The facility census was 73 and the certified census was 24. 1. Review of the policy Administering Topical Medications, dated December 2018, showed the following: -Perform hand hygiene; -Arrange supplies in the medication room or move the medication cart outside the resident's room; -Select the drug from the unit dose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used a gait belt (special belt, used to provide assistance during transfer, ambulation, or positioning in a chair) during transfer for one resident (Resident #10), in a review of 12 sampled residents, and failed to ensure staff used proper technique when repositioning two residents (Residents #10 and #16) in the wheelchair. The total facility census was 73 with a certified census of 24. 1. Review of the facility's undated policy, Ambulate Resident Using Gait Belt, showed the following: -Purpose is to provide safety to residents and nursing staff during ambulation and transfers; -Lower bed to lowest level; assist resident to sit on edge of bed; -Assist resident in putting on nonskid shoes and socks; -Put gait belt around the resident's waist; -Assist the resident to a standing position; -Assist resident to stand by straightening legs as you lift with the gait belt as resident pushes down with hands on mattress. 2. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-09-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one resident (Resident #6), in a review of 12 sampled residents, sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health. The facility census was 73, with a certified census of 24. 1. Review of the facility policy Resident Hydration and Prevention of Dehydration, approved December 2018, showed nurses aides will provide and encourage intake of bedside, snack and meal fluids, on a daily and routine basis as part of daily care. Intake will be documented in the medical records. Aides will report any change in fluid intake to nursing staff. 2. Review of the Nurse Assistant in a Long-Term Care Facility manual, 2001 Revision, showed the following: -Water is essential to life. A person can live only a few days without water. It provides minerals but no other nutrients. The body requires 2000 to 3000 milliliters (ml) daily; -The human body is 60 percent water; -Illness may upset water balance; -Dehydration is an excessive loss of water from body tissues. Symptoms may include thirst, dryness of skin and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff washed their hands after each direct resident contact and when indicated by professional practices during personal care for two residents (Residents #3 and #16), in a review of 12 sampled residents. The total facility census was 73 with a certified census of 24. 1. Review of the facility's policy, Standard Precautions, dated December 2018, showed the following: -Standards precautions will be used in the care of all residents regardless of their diagnosis, or suspected or confirmed infection status. Standard precautions presume that all blood, body fluids, secretions and excretions (except sweat), non-intact skin and mucous membranes may contain transmissible infectious agents; -Hand hygiene refers to handwashing with soap (anti-microbial or non-antimicrobial) OR using alcohol-based hand rubs (gels, foams rinses) that do not require access to water; -Hands shall be washed with soap and water whenever visibly soiled with dirt, blood, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-01-16 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer to the resident and/or the resident's representative when six residents (Residents #11, #12, #16, #29, #35, and #251), in a review of 14 sampled residents, were transferred to the hospital. The facility census was 48. Review of the facility's Transfer or Discharge Notice policy, last revised December 2024, showed the following: -Under the following circumstances, the notice will be given as soon as it is practicable but before the transfer or discharge when an immediate transfer or discharge is required by the resident's urgent medical needs; -The resident and/or representative will be notified in writing of the following information: a. The reason for the transfer or discharge; b. The effective date of the transfer or discharge; c. The location to which the resident is being transferred or discharged ; d. A statement of the resident's rights to appeal the transfer or discharge, including: -The name, address, email…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-01-16 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of the bed hold policy with required information to the resident and/or resident representative within 24 hours of transfer to the hospital for four residents (Residents #11, #16, #35, and #251), in a review of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 48. Review of the facility's undated policy, Bed Hold, showed the following: -If the resident is discharged to the hospital, the bed is considered empty. The facility can do one of two things: -1. Hold the bed for the resident who is in the hospital or on leave from the facility for any reason; -2. Release the bed, allowing the facility to admit a new resident; -During the absence of resident for any reason, the regular charge herein shall apply until the room is released and all belongings are removed. Resident and/or responsible party shall notify the facility's social services department regarding whether resident's bed should be held, or whether resident shall be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-06-23 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post required nurse staffing information, which included the facility name, resident census and total actual hours worked by both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care, per shift, on a daily basis. The facility census was 29. Review of the facility policy, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, revised July 2016 showed the following: -The facility will post, on a daily basis for each shift, the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents; -Within two hours of the beginning of each shift, the number of Licensed Nurses (Registered Nurses (RNs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), and Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs))and the number of unlicensed nursing personnel Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) directly responsible for resident care will be posted in a prominent location (accessible to residents and visitors) and in a clear and readable format; -Directly responsible for resident care means that individuals are responsible for residents'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2019-09-13 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided the resident or resident representative with a Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC) when all covered Medicare services were ending and Medicare days remained for two additional residents (Resident #500 and #501), in a review of three residents selected for review who remained in the facility after Medicare services ended. The total facility census was 73 with a certified census of 24. 1. Review of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Survey and Certification memo, dated 1/9/09, showed the following: -The Notice of Medicare Provider Non-coverage (NOMNC; form CMS-10123) informs the beneficiary of his/her right to an expedited review of a service termination. The skilled nursing facility (SNF) must issue this notice when there is a termination of all Medicare Part A services for coverage reasons. The SNF should not issue this notice if the beneficiary exhausts the Medicare covered days as the number of SNF benefit days is set in law and the quality improvement organization…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LARUS CORPORATION | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 02/19/1988 |
| G. WILLIAM WEIER AND PATRICIA R. WEIER TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/12/2007 |
| RICHARD LAWRENCE WINTER TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/20/2007 |
| WEIER, PATRICIA R. | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/12/2007 |
| WINTER, RICHARD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/19/1988 |
| WEIER, GEORGE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/19/1988 |
| LITLE, CHARLOTTE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2022 |
| LUADERS, JODI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/15/2020 |
| NIEVES, COURTNEY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/22/2024 |
| CHOICE REHABILITATION LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| LARUS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| BAKER, SHAWN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/15/2024 |
| PATWARDHAN, SANJAY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2023 |
| STRICKLAND, CHERYL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2023 |
| BANK OF WASHINGTON | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/25/2020 |
| FORVIS MAZARS LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/29/2022 |
| NHI PARTNERSHIP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/22/1986 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 39 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265321. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.