Bentleys Extended Care
3060 Ashby Road, Overland, MO 63114 · For profit - Corporation · 72 certified beds · (314) 426-0433 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (67) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $28,969 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-04)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 26.3% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.2% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.7% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.6% | 4.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.3% | 17.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.0% | 25.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.2% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.9% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 25.4% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.82 | 2.11 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.43 | 2.33 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 6.9–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. Inspectors cited this home for failing to submit its staffing data to CMS (F0851) — see the citation below; CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
67 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse when an allegation of physical abuse was made for one resident (Resident #1). On 2/1/25 at approximately 10:00 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) A heard banging on the wall inside the resident's room, and someone yelling, Stop that, stop that, do it again, then a loud slap inside the resident's room and when he/she opened the resident's door he/she saw Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) B holding the resident against the wall. RN A notified the Director of Nurses (DON) of an allegation of abuse and the DON directed RN A not to send CNA B home. CNA B remained in the facility providing care to other residents for over five hours after the allegation was reported. The facility did not immediately begin an investigation into the allegation of abuse. Facility staff were not properly educated on the facility's policies of identifying and reporting abuse to ensure residents were free from abuse. The sample was 8. The census was 49. The Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) and DON were notified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 8. Review of Resident #8's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 04/26/2023 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cerebral infarction. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility and transfers and was totally dependent on staff for toilet use; walking and locomotion did not occur during the review period. The MDS indicated the resident had no limitations in range of motion and used a wheelchair for mobility. According to the MDS, the resident did not have falls prior to or since admission. Review of Resident #8's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed no comprehensive care plan for the resident. Review of an Initial Plan of Care, dated 04/26/2023, revealed Resident #8 required assistance of one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of Resident #8's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 04/26/2023 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cerebral infarction. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assistance from staff with bed mobility and transfer and was totally dependent on staff for toilet use; walking and locomotion did not occur during the review period. The resident had no limitations in range of motion and used a wheelchair for mobility. The MDS indicated the resident had no falls since admission or prior to admission. A review of Resident #8's medical record revealed there was no comprehensive care plan for Resident #8. A review of Resident #8's clinical record revealed the resident was not assessed for fall risk upon admission. A review of the Initial Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-06-30 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, the facility failed to assess and/or reassess residents for the safe use of side rails, review the risks and benefits of side rails with the resident and/or the resident's responsible party (RP), obtain informed consent, and attempt appropriate alternatives prior to installing and using side rails on resident beds for 2 (Resident #96 and Resident #10) of 7 residents reviewed for side rail use. Resident #96 stated the side rails were barriers, made her feel confined and stranded, and she had a fear of not being able to get out of bed because of them- causing her to not want to get into her bed to sleep at night. As a result she fell asleep in her chair, fell forward and obtained a large hematoma on the right side of her forehead. Resident #10 had severe impaired cognition, a history of falls, and a history of getting out of bed via the foot of the bed with the side rails up. Facility staff reported putting up both side rails and raising the foot of the bed in an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #2) was free from physical abuse when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) C covered and twisted the resident's mouth when he/she cried during a shower, which resulted in bruising to the resident's face. The sample was 3. The census was 49.Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy, undated, showed:-Policy Statement: Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms;-Policy Interpretation and Implementation:-As part of the resident abuse prevention, the administration will:--Require staff training/orientation programs that include such topics as abuse prevention, identification and reporting of abuse, stress management, and handling verbally or physically aggressive resident behavior;-Establish…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) B assessed a resident and notified one resident's physician after Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) G informed the RN the resident complained of pain and could not stand or walk, which was a change in condition for the resident (Resident #11). Facility staff did not assess the resident or call the physician for at least six hours after the change of condition was noticed. When the resident was evaluated at the hospital, he/she was diagnosed with a wrist fracture. The resident sample was 18. The census was 52. Review of the facility Change in a Resident's Condition or Status policy, revised 12/2016, showed:-Policy Statement: Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g , changes in level of care, etc.)-Policy Interpretation and Implementation:-The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to ensure residents were free from accident hazards. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) B performed a Hoyer (mechanical lift) transfer for one resident (Resident #6) without the assistance of a second person, and the resident was struck in the face with the lift, causing injuries to his/her face. The employee failed to report the incident at the time it occurred, and staff failed to perform neurological assessments for 72 hours following the incident, in accordance with facility policy. In a separate incident, Certified Medication Technician (CMT) C performed a Hoyer transfer for the resident without the assistance of a second person, and failed to ensure the resident's physician-ordered fall mats were positioned at bedside before leaving the room. The resident fell from bed, hit his/her face, and required stitches in his/her forehead. In addition, staff failed to utilize appropriate techniques during a two-person Hoyer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-06-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to identify significant weight loss and implement nutritional interventions for one (Resident #17) of two residents reviewed for weight loss. Specifically, Resident #17 lost 11.4 pounds (8.06%) in seven days and 21.0 pounds (14.85%) in 28 days and had no nutritional interventions implemented. The facility census was 42. Findings included: Review of a facility policy, titled, Nutrition and Hydration to Maintain Skin Integrity, dated 2001 and revised in October 2010, revealed, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the assessment of resident nutritional needs, to aid in the development of an individualized care plan for nutritional interventions, and to help support the integrity of the skin through nutrition and hydration. The policy indicated, The Dietitian, in conjunction with the nursing staff and healthcare practitioners, will conduct a nutritional assessment for each resident upon admission and as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Nurse Aides (NAs) employed by the facility were not charged for a competency evaluation program. The census was 52. Review of the facility's Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Training Program Assistance Agreement, dated 2025, showed:- Student collectively referred to as Parties or individually as a Party;-Whereas, the Student desires to participate in a CNA Training Program Assistance, and whereas, the facility is willing to provide the necessary training and educational materials to the student for the purpose of obtaining a CNA certification;-Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows;-CNA Training Program Assistance Scope and Duration; --The facility shall offer assistance to a comprehensive CNA training program, through a provider, that covers the necessary theoretical knowledge and practical skills required to become a CNA;-Training program fees:--The Student shall pay the training program fees as outline by the Facility;---Tuition for the CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when staff failed to re-order anti-seizure medication for one resident (Resident #1) within 72 hours of its last available dose, per facility policy, resulting in the resident missing doses of the medication on two days. Facility staff failed to administer two of the resident's other anti-seizure medications for one day and the resident had a seizure the next day. The sample was 4. The census was 52.Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 2/2020, showed: -Policy Statement: To administer all medications safely and appropriately to aid residents to overcome illness, relieve and prevent symptoms, and help in diagnosis;-If medication is ordered but not present, call the pharmacy or supervisor to obtain the medication. Review of the facility's Ordering Medications policy, dated 2/2020, showed:-Policy Statement: Medications and related products are ordered from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident fall was thoroughly investigated/evaluated to determine the cause of the fall and failed to implement new interventions and/or modify existing interventions to prevent future falls or reduce the potential of injury or serious injury from future falls. In addition, the facility failed to ensure residents' care plans were updated to reflect current fall interventions and failed to have an updated system in place to communicate fall interventions to staff. Three residents with a history of falls were sampled and problems were identified with all three. (Residents #3, #9 and #7). The census was 57.Review of the facility Assessing Falls and Their Causes policy, undated, showed:-Purpose: The purposes of this procedure are to provide guidelines for assessing a resident after a fall and to assist staff in identifying causes of the fall;-Preparation: 1. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #11's) pain was addressed when he/she experienced a change of condition. On 1/31/26 at approximately 9:00 A.M., the resident complained of pain and could not stand or walk as he/she usually could. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) G informed Registered Nurse (RN) B. RN B did not assess the resident's pain, contact the physician or administer any pain medication. Facility staff did not address the resident's pain or call the physician, until approximately 1/31/26 at 3:00 P.M. when the evening shift started work, which was at least six hours after the resident's pain was first noticed. When the resident was evaluated at the hospital, he/she was diagnosed with a wrist fracture. The resident sample was 18. The census was 52.Review of the facility Change in a Resident's Condition or Status policy, revised 12/2016, showed:-Policy Statement: Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for one resident (Resident #10) who chipped their tooth while at the facility. The sample was 10. The census was 54. Review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/18/25, showed the following: -Cognitively intact; -Dependent with transfers, dressing and wheelchair locomotion; -Diagnoses included diabetes, hemiplegia flaccid of left side (paralysis on left side of body), cerebral infarction (stroke) and nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (bleed in the brain), seizures, and malnutrition; -Oral/Dental status: blank. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 4/30/25, showed no documentation regarding the resident's oral care. Review of the resident's progress notes, showed: -Health status progress note, dated 10/21/2023 at 10:37 A.M., the resident reported his/her left front tooth broke off while eating a piece of candy. Partial tooth remains in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse involving one resident (Resident #1) to the State Survey Agency immediately and not later than two hours after the allegation was made. The sample was 8. The census was 49. Review of the facility's Abuse Investigation and Reporting policy, revised July 2017, showed: -Policy Statement: All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: --Reporting: -All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of an unknown source and misappropriation of property will be reported by the facility Administrator, or his/her designee, to the following persons or agencies, included the State licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying/licensing the facility; -An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-24 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to electronically submit to the Center of Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) complete and accurate direct care staffing information no less frequently than quarterly, for three quarters proceeding the annual survey. The census was 47. Review of the fiscal years Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) staffing report, showed the facility triggered for failing to submit data for: -Fiscal year quarter 1, 2024 (October 1 to December 31); -Fiscal year quarter 2, 2024 (January 1 to March 31); -Fiscal year quarter 3, 2024 (April 1 through June 30). During an interview on 10/24/24 at 12:31 P.M. the Assistant Administrator said it was his responsibility to submit the PBJ report to CMS. He was aware that the report needed to be sent and had not done so.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the dignity of residents by failing to ensure staff members stayed off their cell phones during care (Residents #1, #22, #40 and #44), failing to ensure staff were seated next to the residents while feedings residents (Residents #9 and #20), and failing to ensure staff replaced silverware for a resident who dropped theirs (Resident #21). The sample was 12. The census was 47. Review of the facility's Quality of Life, Dignity policy, dated august 2009, showed: -Policy Statement: each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect and individuality; -Policy Implementation: residents shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times. Treated with dignity means the resident will be assisted in maintaining and enhancing his or her self- esteem and self-worth. Staff shall promote, maintain, and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans with resident-specific interventions to meet the resident's preferences and goals, and to address the resident's medical, physical, and psychosocial needs for five residents (Residents #31, #19, #20, #41, and #44). The sample was 12. The census was 47. Review of the facility's Care Plans - Comprehensive Person-Centered policy, revised December 2016, showed: -Policy Statement: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable outcomes and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: -The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident; -The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents when staff failed to prevent residents' feet from dragging on the floor during staff-assisted propelling for two residents (Residents #41 and #32). Facility staff failed to use gait belts during assisted transfers for three residents (Residents #40, #20, and #41) and failed to ensure one resident with a history of falling from his/her wheelchair was appropriately repositioned in his/her chair (Resident #21). The sample was 12. The census was 47. The facility did not have a written policy regarding transfer protocols. 1. Review of Resident #41's medical record, showed diagnoses of dementia, depression, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and overweight. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS,) a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility staff, dated 7/18/24, showed: -admitted [DATE]; -Clear speech; -Able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 47 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. The census was 47. Review of the facility's Staffing policy, revised, April, 2007, showed: -The facility provides adequate staffing to meet needed care and services of the resident population; -The facility maintains adequate staffing on each shift to ensure that the residents' needs and services are met; -Licensed RN and licensed nursing staff are available to provide and monitor the delivery of resident care services. Review of the facility's staffing sheets dated 10/1 through 10/21/24 showed no RN coverage for: 10/1, 10/2, 10/3, 10/4, 10/6, 10/8, 10/10, 10/11, 10/13, 10/14, and 10/19/24. During an interview on 10/23/24 at 9:05 A.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said she was aware that an RN is required eight hours a day, seven days a week. She is responsible for staffing. It was difficult to get RNs to work. She puts the request for an RN on the agency website, and no one picks up the shift. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of record for all controlled drugs with sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for two out of three medication carts reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents with controlled substance orders. The census was 47. Review of the facility's Controlled Substances policy, revised December, 2012, showed: -The facility shall comply with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of Schedule II (a drug classification) narcotics and other controlled substances; -Nursing staff must count controlled medications at the end of each shift; The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty must make the count together. Review of the Narcotic Count Sheets dated 10/1 through 10/19/24 on the 400 and 500 medication cart showed: -22 out of 57 shifts had no nurse initial on the shift change count; -28 out of 57 shifts only had one nurse initial on the shift change count. Review of the Narcotic Count Sheets dated 10/1 through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure drugs and biologicals stored in the medication room refrigerator were being stored at a proper temperature for one out of one medication rooms observed. The medication room refrigerator also had food and nutritional supplements stored with the medications. The census was 47. Review of the facility's Storage of Medications policy, revised, April, 2007, showed: -The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner; -The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation area in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner; -Medications requiring refrigeration must be stored in a refrigerator located in the drug room at the nurses' station or other secure location; -Medication must be stored separately from food and must be labeled accordingly. During an interview and observation on 10/20/24 at 9:05 A.M., the medication room had a small refrigerator that contained a thermometer hanging on the inside of the door, two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff performed appropriate hand hygiene during meal service which effected 15 residents (Residents #21, #36, #11, #39, #20, #1, #13, #14, #35, #37, #9, #43, #19, #41, and #17). The sample was 12. The census was 79. Review of the facility's handwashing/hand hygiene policy, dated August 2015, Showed: -Policy statement: this facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections; -Policy implementation: all personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors; -Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62 percent alcohol; or, alternatively, soap and water for the following situations: before and after direct contact with residents, before and after eating or handling food, before and after assisting a resident with meals. 1. Review of Resident #21's medical record, showed diagnoses included dementia, dystonia (involuntary muscle contractions that cause repetitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used good infection control practices for one resident when providing wound care (Residents #38). The facility failed to follow acceptable infection control standards by not implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) that employs can spread that requires gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities for certain residents) as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for residents with urinary catheters (a tube that drains the bladder) and wounds requiring treatments (Residents #38 and #31). In addition, the facility failed to provide tuberculosis (TB) testing for five residents out of five residents reviewed for TB testing (Resident #38, #11, #12, #14, and #22). The sample was 12. The census was 47. An EBP policy was requested but not provided by the facility. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer and vaccinate as desired, eligible residents for the pneumococcal (pneumonia) vaccine for 4 out of 5 residents sampled for immunizations (Resident #12, #11, #38, #22). The census was 47. Review of the facility's Pneumococcal Vaccine policy, revised August, 2016, showed; -All residents will be offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia or pneumococcal infections; -Prior to or upon admission, residents will be assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, will be offered the vaccine series within thirty days of admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated or the resident has already been vaccinated; -Assessments of pneumococcal vaccination status will be conducted within 5 working days of the resident's admission if not conducted prior to admission; -Before receiving a pneumococcal vaccine, the resident or legal representative shall receive information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the pneumococcal vaccine;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer the COVID-19 vaccines for four out of five residents sampled for immunizations (Resident #11, #38, #22, and #14). The census was 47. Review of the facility's COVID -19 Vaccination of Residents policy, revised, May, 2023, showed: -Each resident is offered the COVID-19 vaccine unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident is fully vaccinated; -Residents who are eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine are strongly encouraged to do so; -The resident or the resident's representative has the opportunity to accept or refuse COVID-19 vaccine, and to change his/her decision; -COVID-19 vaccine education, documentation and reporting are overseen by the infection preventionist and coordinated by his/her designee; -The individual who coordinates these responsibilities in the facility is the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON); -The COVID-19 vaccine may be offered and provided directly by the facility or indirectly, such as through the arrangement with a pharmacy partner, local health department, or other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) received a minimum of 12 hours on ongoing education annually for five out of five sampled CNAs. The census was 47. A policy related to CNA 12-hour training was requested and not provided by the facility. 1. Review of CNA M's employee file showed hire date: 1/15/20. No in-service training records provided upon request. 2. Review of CNA N's, employee filed showed hire date: 9/28/22. No in-service training records provided upon request. 3. Review of CNA O's employee file showed hire date: 9/10/21. No in-service training records provided upon request. 4. Review of Certified Medication Technician (CMT) F's employee file showed hire Date: 12/12/22. No in-service training records provided upon request. During an interview on 10/23/24 at 12:15 P.M., CMT F said he/she the facility provides in-services, but he/she is not aware of any formal tracking or training system. 5. Review of CMT P's employee file showed hire Date: 4/2/22. No in-service training records provided upon request. 6. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the physician of abnormal lab results for one resident (Resident #11) and to notify the resident and the resident's representative of abnormal lab results and new orders for medications to treat a urinary tract infection (UTI). The sample was 12. The census was 47. Review of the facility's Change in a Resident's Condition or Status policy, revised December 2016, showed: -Policy Statement: Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g., changes in level of care, billing/payments, resident rights, etc.); -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: -The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or physician on call when there has been a(an): --Need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly; -Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, a nurse will notify the resident's representative when: --There is a significant change in the resident's physical,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or resident representative with emergency written notices of transfer/discharge for two residents transferred to the hospital for acute medical reasons (Residents #31 and #19). The sample was 12. The census was 47. Review of the facility's Transfer or Discharge Notice policy, revised December 2016, showed: -Policy Statement: Our facility shall provide a resident and/or the resident's representative (sponsor) with a 30-day written notice of an impending transfer or discharge; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: -A resident and/or his or her representative (sponsor) will be given a 30-day advance notice of an impending transfer or discharge from our facility; -Under the following circumstances, the notice will be given as soon as it is practicable but before the transfer or discharge: --An immediate transfer or discharge is required by the resident's urgent medical needs; -The resident and/or representative will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or resident representative with written information on the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer for two residents transferred to the hospital for acute medical reasons (Residents #31 and #19). The sample was 12. The census was 47. Review of the facility's Bed Holds and Returns policy, revised March 2017, showed: -Policy Statement: Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: -Prior to a transfer, written information will be given to the residents and the resident representatives that explains in detail: --The rights and limitations of the resident regarding bed-holds; --The reserve bed payment policy as indicated by the state plan (Medicaid residents); --The facility per diem rate required to hold a bed (non-Medicaid residents), or to hold a bed beyond the state bed-hold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident received an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status at the time of assessment, by failing to identify the resident's unplanned significant weight loss, unhealed pressure ulcers (injuries to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure or friction), and other skin problems (Resident #31). The sample was 12. The census was 47. Review of Resident #31's medical record, showed diagnoses included bullous pemphigoid (an autoimmune skin disorder that causes blisters on the skin). Review of the resident's weights, showed: -On 2/19/24, weighed 147.2 pounds (lbs); -On 8/19/24, weighed 120.0 lbs; -Significant weight loss of -18.48% in six months. Review of the resident's nutrition quarterly review, dated 8/20/24, showed: -Greater than 10% weight change in 180 days; -Additional information: Significant weight loss of -25 pounds in six months. Continues with trend down. Poor appetite continues. Stability continues to be guarded with declining condition.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to review and revise the plan of care with changes in the resident's care needs for four residents (Residents #38, #46, #22, and #32) of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 47. Review of facility's, undated, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy, showed: -Policy Statement: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and function needs is developed and implanted for each resident; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: Areas of concern that identified during the resident assessment will be evaluated before intervention are added to the care plan. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed with seven (7) days of the completion of the required comprehensive assessment. Assessments of resident are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' condition change. 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all staff certified in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating) received their CPR certification through a provider whose training includes hands-on practice and in-person skills assessment. The facility identified 10 CPR-certified staff and problems were found with three. The sample was 12. The census was 47. Review of the facility's Advance Directives policy, revised [DATE], showed no guidance for ensuring staff received CPR certification through a provide whose training includes hands-on practice and in-person skills assessment. Review of the facility's resident code status report, reviewed [DATE], showed 22 residents with full code status. Review of the CPR certification for CPR-certified facility staff, showed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A, Registered Nurse (RN) Q, and the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) through a provider that offers online CPR certification.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services consistent with acceptable standards of practice for one resident when staff failed to accurately assess the appropriate wheelchair size, resulting in skin irritation and indentations to the resident's legs, and failed to reposition the resident for six hours (Resident #41). In addition, the facility failed to date when a dressing was completed for one resident (Resident #16). The sample size was 12. The census was 47. Review of the facility's undated admission Assessment and Follow Up: Role of the Nurse, showed: -Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to gather information about the resident's physical, emotional, cognitive, and psychosocial condition upon admission for the purpose of managing the resident, initiating the care plan, and completing required assessment instruments, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff). 1. Review of Resident #41's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foot care was maintained for two of 12 sampled residents (Resident #44 and Resident #21) resulting in long nails and dry feet. The census was 47. Review of the facility's activities of daily living (ADL) Policy, dated march 2018, showed: -Policy statement: residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out ADLs. Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene; -Policy Implementation: appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care), mobility (transfer and ambulation, including walking),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for a resident with an order for continuous oxygen usage (Resident #44). In addition, the facility failed to ensure oxygen masks were properly stored while not in use and the facility had a process to ensure routine changing of the oxygen tubing for infection control purposes, for two sampled residents (Resident #44 and Resident #14). The sample was 12. The Census was 47. Review of the facility's Oxygen Administration policy, revised October 2010, showed: -The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration; -Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's order or facility protocol for oxygen administration; -The policy failed to address storage of oxygen supplies to prevent contamination, or frequency and process to change out oxygen tubing. 1. Review of Resident #44's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolatedEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Nursing Assistants (NAs) that were employed by the facility were certified within 4 months of hire for five out of five NA's, who worked in the facility for more than 4 months. The census was 47. Review of the Facility Assessment, reviewed 7/21/23, showed: -Staff training and education that are necessary to provide level and types of support and care needed for the resident population included certification and licensure requirements, yearly in-services, and additional education provided when needs are trends are identified. Record review the hire dates for of all NAs, reviewed on 10/23/24, showed: -The facility hired NA R on 5/5/21; -The facility hired NA J on 8/2/23; -The facility hired NA S on 4/3/24; -The facility hired NA C on 4/26/24; -The facility hired NA T on 5/20/24; -The five NAs were not certified within the required 4 month period. During an interview on 10/21/24 at 8:07 and 8:55 A.M., NA C said he/she has worked at the facility since April, 2024 and was waiting to test out. He/She has completed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications when one resident (Resident #19) was prescribed Haldol (haloperidol, antipsychotic medication) without appropriate documentation in the resident's medical record to support the clinical need for the medication. The facility failed to appropriately monitor for adverse consequences and medication effectiveness when the resident had an increase in falls after the adjustment to his/her psychotropic medications, and no improvement with his/her psychiatric symptoms. The sample was 12. The census was 47. Review of the facility's Antipsychotic Medication Use policy, revised [DATE], showed: -Policy Statement: Antipsychotic medications may be considered for residents with dementia but only after medical, physical, functional, psychological, emotional, psychiatric, social and environmental causes of behavioral symptoms have been identified and addressed; -Policy Interpretation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week; and failed to hire, maintain or designate a Registered Nurse (RN) to serve as the Director of Nursing (DON) on a full time basis. This deficiency had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 50. Review of the facility's undated list of Department Heads, provided on 7/1/24, showed no DON employed within the facility. Review of the facility's daily assignment sheets, dated 6/17/24 through 7/2/24, showed no DON for all 16 days and no RN in the facility on 6/17, 6/18, 6/19, 6/20, 6/26, 6/28, 6/29 and 7/1/24, for a total of 8 out of 16 days. During an interview on 7/1/24 at 12:54 P.M., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A said they had not had a DON in a couple of months. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) is the person everyone went to and who handled all DON duties. He/She did not know if the ADON was an RN or Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). The facility had a couple RNs, but they mainly work evenings or overnight. He/She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — widespreadEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility document review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure nursing assistants (NAs), who were full-time employees, completed the required competency exam for certification within four months of hire for 6 (NAs #3, #4, #8, #11, #16, and #20) of 13 nursing assistants reviewed for competencies. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 42. Findings included: Review of the facility's staffing schedule for June 2023 revealed the facility employed non- certified nursing assistants (NAs #3, #4, #8, #11, #16, and #20) on a full-time basis. The schedule further indicated for the evening shift, there were no certified nursing assistants (CNAs) scheduled to work, only NAs were scheduled to work. Review of an untitled and undated facility document with staff credentials and hire dates revealed the following hire dates for 6 of 13 nursing assistants. -NA #3: 07/02/2021 -NA #4: 09/28/2022 -NA #8: 02/01/2022 -NA #11: 09/10/2021 -NA #16: 02/03/2023 -NA #20: 05/05/2021 Review of personnel files for nursing assistants (NAs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation in 1 of 1 kitchen when Dietary Aide (DA) #1 and the [NAME] did not know how to ensure proper sanitizer concentration for a low temperature dish machine. The facility census was 42. Findings included: A review of the facility's undated policy titled, Dishwashing, revealed, Check chemical dispensers for proper operation and adequate supply of chemical. A review of the facility's Chemical Sanitizing Dish Machine Log, dated June 2023, revealed the chemical concentration of chlorine was to be 100 parts per million (ppm). Entries were to be entered on the Dish Machine Log once a day. Further review revealed, Corrective action must be taken if the chemical concentration requirement is not met. Although requested, facility staff did not provide manufacturer's instructions for the dish machine. A review of the facility's Chemical Sanitizing Dish Machine Log, dated June 2023, indicated the chemical concentration for chlorine at 5:50 AM on 06/13/2023 was 100 ppm.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-30 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was administered in a manner that effectively and efficiently attained or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident when the facility failed to: - Thoroughly investigate falls to determine causal factors, implement and evaluate interventions to prevent falls, and provide sufficient supervision. - Assess and/or reassess residents for the safe use of side rails, review the risks and benefits of side rails with the resident and/or the resident's responsible party (RP), obtain informed consent, and attempt appropriate alternatives prior to installing and using side rails on residents' beds. - Complete and transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) data within the required time frames - Review, update, and implement comprehensive care plans within the required time frames; and - Ensure nursing assistants (NA), who were full-time employees, completed the required competency exam for certification within four months of hire. -Failed to employ a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-30 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and facility document and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct and accurately document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to competently care for its residents and failed to review this assessment at least annually. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 42. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Facility Assessment, revised in 07/2017, specified, A facility assessment is conducted annually to determine and update our capacity to meet the needs of and competently care for our residents during day-to-day operations. Determining our capacity to meet the needs of and care for our residents during emergencies is included in this assessment. 1. Once a year, and as needed, a designated team conducts a facility-wide assessment to ensure that the resources are available to meet the specific needs of our residents. The policy further indicated, 4. The facility assessment also includes a detailed review of the resources available to meet the needs of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-30 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to have an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that obtained feedback, used data, took action to conduct structured, systematic investigations and analyzed underlying causes or contributing factors of problems affecting facility-wide processes that impacted quality of care, quality of life and, resident safety. Specifically, the facility QAPI program failed to: - Identify that the facility did not investigate falls to determine causal factors, implement and evaluate interventions to prevent falls, and provide sufficient supervision to residents. - Identify the facility did not assess and/or reassess residents for the safe use of side rails, review the risks and benefits of side rails with the resident and/or the resident's responsible party (RP), obtain informed consent, and attempt appropriate alternatives prior to installing and using side rails on residents' beds. - Identify the facility was not completing and transmitting Minimum Data Set (MDS) data within the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #17 followed the steps for hand hygiene when providing incontinent care for 1 (Resident #145) of 2 residents reviewed for incontinence care; 2. Certified Medicine Technician (CMT) #19 did not touch medication with her bare hands when administering medication for 1 (Resident #96) of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration; and 3. Measures were in place, such as by having a documented water management program, to minimize the risk of Legionella and or other waterborne pathogens, which had the potential to affect all residents. Findings included: 1. A review of a facility policy titled, Infection Control Guidelines for All Nursing Procedures revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-30 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic stewardship program was in place. The facility's failure to develop, promote, and implement a facility-wide system to monitor the use of antibiotics had the potential to affect all 43 residents living in the facility. Findings included: A review of an undated facility policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship, revealed Purpose: The purpose being to ensure that residents are not subjected to the inappropriate use of antibiotics [nd] therefore the residents have improved outcomes with fewer adverse events. Note: Antibiotic Stewardship is part of the Infection Prevention and Control Program within the facility. During an interview on 06/21/2023 at 1:21 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she did not know anything about the antibiotic stewardship program. During an additional interview on 06/23/2023 at 10:43 AM, she stated the facility was not tracking or trending the antibiotic use in the facility. During an interview on 06/24/2023 at 12:32 PM, the Assistant Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-30 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to employ a qualified infection preventionist. The facility's failure to employ a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevention and control program had the potential to affect all 43 residents living in the facility. Findings included: A review of an undated facility policy, titled Infection Preventionist, revealed the IP is responsible for the effective direction, management, and operation of the infection prevention program, including the education of facility staff members and independent practitioners, and consulting with the county and state department of health. The IP utilizes evidence-based practices such as those published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Additionally, the IP ensures compliance with regulations and requirements from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), other accrediting healthcare organizations and state regulations. The IP is responsible for the facilities activities aimed at preventing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-30 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain a process to follow Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to reconcile the Resident Trust Fund (RTF) Account monthly. The facility census was 42. Record review of the facility maintained RTF Cash Reconciliation Statement for the period 6/2022 through 5/2023, showed the facility did not follow GAAP, and did not investigate (identify or detail) why there were several outstanding transactions (old checks) from 2017 - 2019. Record review of the facility maintained RTF attempted reconciliation for the period 6/2022 through 5/2023, showed the facility carried over a difference each month for transactions from 2017 - 2019, for the following months, without identifying or detailing the outstanding transactions. Month RTF Ledgers RTF Bank #1 Statement Balance 6/2022 $38,604.05 $43,405.53 Difference of old, outstanding checks: $4,801.48 7/2022 $39,251.60 $44,053.08 Difference of old, outstanding checks: $4,801.48 8/2022 $40,127.00 $45,260.48 Difference of old, outstanding checks: $5,133.48 9/2022…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-30 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS) within the required 7-day time frame for 5 (Residents #96, #10, #27, #23, and #36) of 29 residents reviewed for MDS transmission. The facility census was 42. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Electronic Transmission of the MDS, dated 09/2010, specified, All MDS assessments (for example (e.g.), admission, annual, significant change, quarterly review, etc.) and discharge and reentry records will be completed and electronically encoded into our facility's MDS information system and transmitted to CMS' QIES Assessment Submission and Process (ASAP) system in accordance with current OBRA regulations governing the transmission of MDS data. 6. The MDS Coordinator is responsible for ensuring the appropriate edits are made prior to transmitting MDS data and that feedback and validation reports from each transmission are maintained for historical purposes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-30 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately completed for 3 (Residents #6, #10, and #14) of 29 residents for whom MDS assessments were reviewed. Specifically, falls were not accurately coded on the assessments completed for Resident #10 and Resident #14 and administration of anticoagulant medication was inaccurately coded for Resident #6. The facility census was 42. Findings included: Review of the facility policy titled, MDS [Minimum Data Set] Error Correction, dated 2001 and revised in September 2010, indicated, 5. If an error is discovered after the encoding period and the record in error is an OBRA Assessment [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] assessment, determine if the error is major or minor. a. A minor error is one related to the coding of the MDS. For minor errors, correct the record and submit to the QIES [Quality Improvement Evaluation System] ASAP [Assessment Submission and Processing] system. b. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure 2 (nurses' medication cart and 400/500 Hall medication cart) of 3 medication carts were maintained in a safe manner. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure narcotics were secured in a separately locked compartment, drugs were not expired, and that there were no loose medications in the med cart; and medications were not repackaged. The facility census was 42. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, dated [DATE], indicated, 1. Drugs and biologicals shall be stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received. Only the issuing pharmacy is authorized to transfer medications between containers. 2. The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage AND preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. The policy continued, 4. The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #96) was treated with respect and dignity and in an environment that promotes quality of life when a staff member used foul language in front of them while providing assistance. The facility census was 42. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Bentleys Extended Care Abuse Policy, with a revision date of 07/27/2021, indicated verbal abuse was defined as the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Review of Resident #96's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 04/22/2023 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, macular degeneration, and age-related osteoporosis. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician about a significant change in status for one (Resident #17) of two residents reviewed for weight loss. Specifically, the facility did not notify the physician when Resident #17 lost 11.4 pounds (8.06%) in seven days, and 21.0 pounds (14.85%) in 28 days. The facility census was 42. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, dated 2001 and revised in December 2016, indicated, Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g., changes in level of care, billing/payments, resident rights, etc.). The policy indicated, The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or physician on call when there has been a: d. significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition: e. need to alter the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete an admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 2 (Resident #145 and Resident #44) of 29 residents reviewed for resident assessments. The facility census was 42. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Electronic Transmission of the MDS, with a revision date of September 2010, indicated, All MDS assessments (e.g., admission, annual, significant change, quarterly review, etc.) and discharge and reentry records will be completed and electronically encoded into our facility's MDS information system and transmitted to CMS [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] QIES [Quality Improvement Evaluation System] Assessment Submission and Process (ASAP) system in accordance with current OBRA [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] regulations governing the transmission of MDS data. 1. A review of Resident #145's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 05/24/2023 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to complete a new Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level I screening for two (Resident #35 and Resident #23) of three residents reviewed for PASARRs. Specifically, the facility failed to submit an updated PASARR level I screen when Resident #35 was diagnosed with unspecified psychosis on 01/14/2022 after admission and when Resident #23 was diagnosed with bipolar disorder on 03/04/2019. The facility census was 42. Findings included: Review of an undated facility policy titled, Preadmission Screening and Resident Review, indicated, Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) [sic] is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. PASRR can also advance person-centered care planning by assuring that psychological, psychiatric, and functional needs are considered along with personal goals and preferences in planning long term care. 1. A review of Resident #23's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders were obtained for dialysis treatment and failed to ensure the facility's communication forms were completed for the ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services for one (Resident #36) of two sampled residents who received dialysis. The facility census was 42. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Care of a Resident with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), revised in 09/2010, indicated, 5. The resident's comprehensive care plan will reflect the resident's needs related to ESRD/dialysis care. A review of Resident #36's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 04/18/2023 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #36 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated the resident had moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate less than 5%. There were two errors in 25 opportunities, which resulted in an 8% medication error rate for 2 (Resident #96 and Resident #33) of 6 residents observed for medication pass. The facility census was 42. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Administering Oral Medications, revised in 10/2010, indicated, Check the label on the medication and confirm the medication name and dose with the MAR (Medication Administration Record). The policy continued, Check the medication dose. Re-check to confirm the proper dose. 1. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #96 on 04/22/2023 with diagnoses that included essential hypertension (abnormally high blood pressure). A review of Resident #96's Order Summary Report with active orders as of 06/13/2023 revealed an order, dated 04/21/2023, for metoprolol succinate ER (extended release) 50 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 12 hours related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of significant medication error for 1 (Resident #33) of 6 residents observed during medication administration. Certified Medicine Technician (CMT) #19 failed to hold blood pressure medication when the resident's blood pressure was outside parameters established by the resident's physician orders. The facility census was 42. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors, revised in 04/2014, indicated, A 'medication error' is defined as the preparation or administration of drugs or biological which is not in accordance with physician's orders, manufacturer specifications or accepted professional standards and principles of the professional(s) providing services. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #33 on 09/29/2020 with diagnoses that included essential hypertension and heart failure. A review of Resident #33s Order Summary Report with active orders as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-11-07 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for three of three sampled residents (Resident #20, #31, and #105) who remained in the facility upon discharge from Medicare A services for rehabilitation. The facility census was 58. 1. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Survey and Certification memo (S&C-09-20), dated 1/9/09, showed the following: -The Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC, form CMS-10123) is issued when all covered Medicare services end for coverage reasons; -If the skilled nursing facility (SNF) believes on admission or during a resident's stay that Medicare will not pay for skilled nursing or specialized rehabilitative services and the provider believes that an otherwise covered item or service may be denied as not reasonable or necessary, the facility must inform the resident or his/her legal representative in writing why these specific services may not be covered and the beneficiary's potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-11-07 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of four randomly selected certified nurse aides (CNA) received the required annual 12 hour resident care training. The census was 58. Review of the CNA individual in-service records, showed the following: -CNA A hired 9/12/13, with 0 hours of in-service education; -CNA B hired 3/9/01, with 0 hours of in-service education; -CNA C hired 8/1/05, with 0 hours of in-service education; -CNA D hired 3/3/17, with 0 hours of in-service education. Review of the facility assessment, showed the facility is required to develop, implement and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff; individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement; and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. A facility must determine the amount and types of training necessary based on a facility assessment as specified. During an interview on 11/5/19 at 3:07 P.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed that there were four CNAs who have been employed for more than one year and was not able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete perineal care (peri-care, cleansing from the front of the hips, in between the legs and buttocks to the back of the hips) was provided for two of two care observations (Residents #38 and #28). The census was 58. Review of the facility's undated peri-care procedure, showed: -Procedure: Expose the perineal area. Start at the top of the groin and wash down one side of the outer groin tissue, turn the wash cloth and wash the other side of the outer groin. Turn the wash cloth again and wash down the middle of the peri area in a downward motion and front to back manner. Obtain a clean wash cloth and continue cleaning down the legs as needed. Dry the peri area. Roll the resident onto one side and continue washing soiled and wet areas from front to back. 1. Review of Resident #38's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/10/19, showed: -Severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident monthly pharmacy drug regimen recommendations were followed up on, for one out of six residents sampled for medication regimen review (MRR) (Resident #39). In addition, the facility medication review policy failed to include the appropriate time frames for the different steps in the MRR process. The sample was 15. The census was 58. Review of the facility's undated Medication Regimen Review policy, showed: -The consultant pharmacist will review the medication regimen of each resident in sufficient detail to determine if any apparent irregularities exist. Federally mandated standards of care as well as other applicable standards serve as the basis for the review; -The review of the medication regimen will include all medications, including medications that are ordered on an as needed basis. The consultant pharmacist will report any apparent irregularities in writing to the attending physician, the director of nursing and the medical director; -In addition to the written communication to the attending…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurately documented medical records for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident #28) identified as receiving one to one activities. The facility did not provide documentation of individualized one to one activities, what kind of activity was provided and length of time the activity was provided. The census was 58. Review of the facility's activity assessment policy, revised 10/2009, showed: -Policy: In order to promote the physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing of residents, an activity assessment is conducted and maintained for each resident; -Policy interpretation and Implementation: -The resident's assessment will be conducted by the activity department personnel, in conjunction with other staff who will assess related factors such as functional level, cognition and medical conditions that may affect activities participation. The resident's lifelong interests, spirituality, life roles, goals, strengths, needs and activity pursuit patterns and preferences will be included in the assessment; -The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-07 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a coordinated plan of care for residents receiving hospice services and maintain required hospice records onsite at the facility. The facility identified five residents who elected hospice services and all five were included in the sample. Issues were found with two of the five residents (Residents #28 and #225). The census was 58. 1. Review of Resident #28's hospice binder, showed: -admitted to hospice services on 3/12/16; -Hospice admission diagnosis: Malignant melanoma (cancer) of the face. Review of the resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/22/19, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Diagnoses of melanoma and dementia; -Received hospice services. Review of the resident's hospice aide care plan, located in the hospice binder and updated on 9/11/19, showed: -The resident is dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs) and is unable to make any needs known, receives a shower every Tuesday and Friday. Hospice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to follow the hand hygiene policy and prevent the potential spread of contaminates during personal care by failing to change gloves and wash hands for two of two care observations (Residents #28 and #38). The census was 58. Review of the facility's handwashing/hand hygiene policy, revised 10/2009, showed: -Purpose: To provide guidelines for effective hand washing and hygiene techniques that will aid in the prevention of the transmission of infections; -Objective: To prevent and control the spread of infectious diseases; -General Guidelines: Approximate 10 to 15 second handwashing with antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial soap and water must be performed under the following conditions: When hands are visibly dirty, before and after resident contact (for which hand hygiene is indicated by acceptable professional practice), before and after assisting resident with personal care (oral care, bathing), before and after assisting a resident to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2019-11-07 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to make available in a place readily accessible to residents, family members and legal representatives of residents, deficiencies resulting from any subsequent complaint investigation since the most recent survey and the associated plan of correction. The census was 58. Observation on all days of the survey, 11/4, 11/5, 11/6, and 11/7/19, showed the facility's previous survey results, maintained in a binder on a desk at the side entrance to the building with a sign to refer to administration for previous surveys. Review of the survey binder, showed the most recent annual survey, dated 1/30/19, with the plan of correction. The survey binder also showed one previous survey, dated 3/20/18, with the plan of correction. The survey binder did not include any information regarding the complaint investigation with resulting deficiencies and the associated plan of correction, dated 8/6/19. During an interview on 11/7/19 at 12:02 P.M., the administrator said he was aware the most recent survey results should be available;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$28,969 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $28,969 — penalty dated 2025-02-04
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-03-10 for 5 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BENTLEY, DAVID JOE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 100% | since 06/23/2004 |
| BENTLEY, GAYLA DENISE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/18/2003 |
| GAO, SHAWN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $533K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265732. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.