Ozark Care & Rehab Center
1486 North Riverside Rd, Ozark, MO 65721 · For profit - Corporation · 93 certified beds · (417) 581-7126 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $48,557 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-30)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.5% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 5.3% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.5% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.6% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.3% | 17.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.0% | 25.6% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 77.9% | 90.9% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.5% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.8% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 29.1% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.66 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 93 beds and averages 81.0 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.90 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.01 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect each resident's right to be free from neglect when staff failed to check on one resident (Resident #1), who resided in the locked special care unit (SCU), for over 11 hours. Staff found the resident under his/her bed, unresponsive, with dried blood and emesis present. The resident was sent to the hospital and later passed away. The facility did not have a system in place to ensure on-site nursing staff monitored care provided by the aides and to ensure nurse aides performed walking rounds per facility policy. The facility census was 71. The Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) were notified on 07/26/24, at 6:15 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 07/23/24. The IJ was removed on 07/26/24 as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse and Neglect Definition and Policy, undated, showed the following: -Neglect is the failure to provide services to an eligible adult by any person, firm, or corporation with a legal or contractual duty to do so, when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from significant medication errors when staff continued to administer a medication for 12 days, instead of 5 days as ordered, which resulted in a gastrointestinal bleed and contributed to the death of one resident (Resident #1). A sample of eight residents were reviewed. The facility census was 65. The Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified on 03/06/24 at 12:10 P.M., of the Past Non-Compliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which occurred on 02/07/24. On 02/07/24, the DON and Assistant DON (ADON) reviewed the resident's chart and began an investigation, educated the employee involved and nursing staff, and in-serviced all facility staff on 02/20/24. The facility implemented daily chart monitoring to ensure medication orders are entered and followed correctly. The IJ was corrected on 02/20/24. Review of the facility's policy, titled Passing Medication, undated, showed the following: -Objective to administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-03-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents remained free of accident hazards and received adequate assistance with assistive devices to prevent further accidents when the facility failed to ensure staff were trained on and operated mechanical lifts (Hoyer - a mobile, mechanical device designed to safety lift and transfer patients with limited mobility between beds, wheelchairs, toilets, or baths ) in a safe manner by standards of practice resulting one resident (Resident # 2) falling from the lift and suffering lacerations and continued numbness in chine. The facility census was 81.Review of the facility policy titled Fall Protocol, undated, showed the following:-Immediately do a physical assessment of the resident who has fallen to include vital signs and neurological assessments. Measure any bruising or impaired skin;-Investigate the incident;-Notify the on-call nurse, if significant injury occurs notify the physician;-Notify the responsible party;-Fill out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed provide pharmaceutical services that included accurate documentation and safe administering of all medications when staff failed to obtain a physician's order before leaving one resident's (Resident #1) medications at bedside and when the staff that signed off on the medication administration was not the staff member who administered the medication. The facility census was 81.Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration Policy and Safety Tips, undated, showed the following:-Nurses must use acceptable nursing practices when administering medications;-Never leave medications in a resident's room, unless there is an order from a physician stating may leave at bedside;-stay with resident until resident has taken medication. If the resident refuses, then take the medication with you when leaving the room period do not leave the medication in the room. 1. Review of the Resident #1's face sheet (a brief profile) showed the following:-admission date of 05/01/19;-Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible abuse were investigated immediately and steps were taken to protect all residents during the investigation when staff failed to be begin an immediate full and documented investigation and allowed the alleged staff member continue to work independently when one resident (Resident #1) made an allegation of staff to resident abuse. The facility census was 82.Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure, revised 03/20/25, showed the following:-It is the policy and the right of each resident to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property and exploitation;-All reports of resident abuse will be reported to the local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and/or designee. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported;-All investigations will be thoroughly investigated. The Administrator, DON and/or designee shall initiate the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible abuse were reported within two hours to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) when staff failed to report an allegation of staff to resident abuse alleged by one resident (Resident #1) to DHSS. The facility census was 82.Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure, revised 03/20/25, showed the following:-It is the policy and the right of each resident to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property and exploitation;-All reports of resident abuse will be reported to the local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), and/or designee. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported;-If resident abuse is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the Administrator, DON, and/or their designee and to other officials according to state law;-The Administrator, DON, or the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an ongoing monitoring process to include accurate documentation, destruction and accountability of expired or unusable medications, and failed to ensure medications that could not be returned to the pharmacy were destroyed in a timely manner for 34 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34). The facility census was 78.Review of the facility's policy titled Narcotic Control Logging, Documentation, Count and Discrepancies, undated, showed the following:-It is the policy to ensure the proper handling and tracking of controlled medications;-Controlled medications will be subject to special receipt, record-keeping, medication assistance, change of shift count verification, storage, and disposal procedures;-Nurse must sign the individual narcotic sheet for every card received. Do not put two cards on one individual narcotic sheet;-The nurse must sign their name and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to the resident's right to be free from physical and verbal abuse by staff when one staff member (Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) B) grabbed the arm and wrist of one resident (Resident #1) and cursed at this resident. A sample of seven residents was selected for review out of a facility census was 64. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure, undated showed the following: -It is the policy and the right of each resident to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This includes, but is not limited to, freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms; -Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment resulting in physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation of an individual of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the current daily nurse staffing information in a clear and readable format and in a prominent place readily accessible to all residents and visitors. The facility census was 66. Review of the facility's Nursing Staff of Duty, undated, showed the form included the following; -Date, census, number of residents in house and number of residents in hospital; -Registered nurse (RN) hours; -RN and Licensed practical nurse (LPN) hours for 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. shift and 7:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. shift; -Certified medication technician (CMT) hours for 7:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M., 3:00 P.M. to 7:00 P. M., and 7:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. shifts; -Certified nursing assistant (CNA) and nursing assistant (NA) hours for 7:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M., 3:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M., 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. and 11:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. shifts; -Restorative Aide and Bath Aide hours. Observations on 03/17/25, at 11:05 P.M., on 03/18/25, at 10:27 A.M. and 12:23 P.M., and on 03/19/25, at 8:42 A.M., showed daily nurse staffing information posted on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of staff to resident abuse to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within the required two hour timeframe when a staff member Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C allegedly witnessed CNA D being rough with one resident (Resident #1) and failed to report an allegation of misappropriation within the required twenty-four hour timeframe when staff received an allegation from one resident (Resident #2) of multiple personal items taken from his/her room. Seven residents were sampled. The facility census was 66. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse and Neglect Definition and Policy, updated 11/27/17, showed the following: -Abuse is the infliction of physical, sexual, or emotional injury or harm including financial exploitation by any person, firm or corporation; -A person commits the crime of financial exploitation of an elderly or disabled person if such person knowingly and by deception, intimidation, or force…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to take steps to protect all residents after staff failed to report that a staff member (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D) acted in an abusive manor by roughly caring for one resident (Resident #1) and the CNA continued to work independently with residents. The facility also failed to investigate an allegation of misappropriation of property for one resident (Resident #2). Seven residents were sampled and the facility census was 66. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse and Neglect Definition and Policy, updated 11/27/17, showed the following: -The Administrator or his/her designated representative will immediately initiate a thorough investigation after an allegation is made; -The results of the investigation will be reported to State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident, and if the alleged violation is verified, appropriate corrective action will be taken; -Any employee with allegations of abuse will immediately be placed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all food stored in the main kitchen was free from possible contamination when staff failed ensure food was appropriately labeled and dated, and not expired or past used by date. The failure had the potential to increase the prevalence and spread of food borne illnesses and infection for all 68 facility residents. Review of the facility's policy titled, Cold Food Storage Chart, undated, indicated that opened foods must be dated with the open date and leftovers must be labeled with the date it was made and what it is. 1. During an observation on 12/09/24, at 10:42 A.M., the following was observed in the reach-in refrigerator and verified by the Dietary Manager (DM) during the initial kitchen tour: -Opened 5-pound (lb.) container of cottage cheese with no date of opening, with a Styrofoam cup inside the container. -One-gallon mayonnaise open with used date 10/22/24; -One-gallon BBQ sauce open and dated 10/17/24; -One-gallon Honey Mustard dated 03/28/24; -One-gallon Pimento Spread opened with used by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care per standard of practice for all residents when staff failed to administer oxygen as ordered for one resident (Resident #62) and when staff failed to ensure oxygen supplies were stored and changed appropriately when not in use for two residents (Resident #37 and #55). Review of the facility's policy titled Ozark Nursing and Care Center, undated, showed all oxygen tubing must be kept in a baggie when not in use. 1. Review of Resident #62's Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, showed the following: -admission date of 04/29/24; -Diagnoses included tobacco use, shortness of breath, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs). Review of the resident's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/15/24, located in the resident's EMR under the MDS tab, showed the resident had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at bedside for a resident that was not assessed to self-administer medications for one resident (Resident #36) out of 21 residents in the sample. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration undated, showed the following regarding self-administration of medication by residents: -The resident must be alert and oriented and be familiar with taking his/her own medication. The medication must be kept in a locked box or locked drawer. -The resident must have a physician's order for self-administration. -A list of the medication was kept in the resident's MAR and his/her medical record. This list was monitored by the charge nurse every month and when there was any change of orders. -The charge nurse will also check the lock box periodically, but at least weekly. -The resident had a medication administration sheet that he/she kept to document when he/she took any medication. 1. Review of Resident #62's Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical record (EMR)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a complete care plan for each resident when staff failed to care plan smoking on the facility's property for two residents (Resident #12 and #62) of two residents reviewed for smoking. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan Policy, dated 03/23/18, showed initial care plans are written shortly after admission (or re-admission) and are reviewed every three months so new problems can be dealt with at the time. 1. Review of Resident #12's Face Sheet tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) showed the following: -admission date on 01/31/24; -Diagnoses included nicotine dependence. Review of the resident's Care Plan, dated 03/21/24 and located in the Care Plan tab of the EMR, showed the staff did not care plan related to the resident's nicotine dependence and smoking. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/14/24, and located in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure effective pain management was provided for every resident when staff failed to keep pain medication in stock and failed to follow-up on pain relief after administering as needed pain medication for one resident (Resident #14) reviewed for pain of 21 sampled residents. 1. Review of Resident #14's Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, showed the following: -admission date of 01/18/24; -Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (MS - a chronic autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system, which includes the brain, spinal cord, and optic nerves) and lower back pain. Review of the resident's Care Plan, dated 10/30/20, located in the resident's EMR under the Care Plan tab, showed the resident had had chronic pain. Interventions included for staff to address complaints of pain promptly and administer as needed (PRN) medication for breakthrough pain. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Director of Nursing (DON) did not serve as a charge nurse or certified nurse aide (CNA) when the facility census was greater than 60. The facility census was 68. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding the responsibilities of the DON position. 1. Review of the facility provided nurse schedules and staff rosters, dated August 2024, showed the following: -On 08/09/24, the DON worked as a charge nurse on the 3:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. evening shift. The facility census was 72; -On 08/13/24, the DON worked as a certified nurse aide (CNA)/nurse aide (NA) on the 6:30 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. evening shift. The facility census was 71; -On 08/16/24, the DON worked as a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Certified Medication Technician (CMT) on the 6:30 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. day shift. The facility census was 71; -On 08/19/24, the DON worked as a CNA/NA on the 6:30 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. evening shift. The census was 73; -On 08/23/24, the DON worked as a CNA/NA on the 6:30 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. evening shift. The census was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility promoted each resident's right to self-determination when staff failed to provide bath/showers as preferred for four residents (Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7 and Resident #8) out of a sample of 14 residents. The facility had a census of 68. Review of the facility's policy titled, Shower Protocol, undated showed the following: -A and B wing shower schedule: Monday and Thursday hall one and two receive showers and Tuesday and Friday hall three and four receive showers. Wednesday is a make up day; -Document in the computer if shower given or not; -If resident refuses, fill out refusal form and have charge nurse chart refusal; -Shower list should be done daily and turned into front office with refusal forms. 1. Review of Resident #5's face sheet (admission data) showed the following: -admission date of 07/15/22; -Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a group of lung disease that blocks airflow and makes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care per standards of practice when staff failed to consistently assess and document complete, thorough, and accurate weekly skin assessments and when staff failed to complete weekly wound tracking for three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) with pressure ulcers (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) out of a sample of four residents. The facility census was 68. Review of the facility's policy titled Skin Integrity/Wound Policy, dated 01/19/24, showed the following: -The Director of Nursing (DON)/designee will perform weekly skin assessments for all reported residents with alteration of skin integrity related to ulceration of skin and document stage, size, description, color. and odor; -Weekly skin assessments on all residents will be completed and documented by the charge nurse. Weekly skin assessment documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-30 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a current and accurate facility assessment when facility staff failed to review and update the comprehensive facility assessment at least annually. The facility census was 71. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding the facility assessment. 1. Review of the facility assessment showed staff completed the current facility assessment in 2023. The staff did not document a review of the facility assessment since April 2023. During an interview on 07/26/24, at 4:40 P.M., the Administrator said the following: -The facility assessment is supposed to be updated annually and the last time she updated it was 04/26/23. -She did not do the annual update in 2024. -She is responsible for reviewing and completing the facility assessment. -The facility staff should review the facility assessment yearly. -Departments heads and the physician should be involved and discuss the facility assessment. -The facility assessment should have been reviewed and updated in April 2024.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-24 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect all residents from misappropriation of resident property when staff could not account for a missing narcotic for one resident (Resident #1) that had been in the possession of the facility. The facility census was 68. On 10/06/23, at 7:25 P.M., the facility staff discovered the missing narcotic card and notified facility management. Facility staff notified Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) of the noncompliance and began inservicing of all certified medication technicians and nurses regarding the narcotic count policy and procedures on 10/07/23. The Director of Nursing (DON) audited all narcotic carts and found no other missing medications. The noncompliance was corrected on 10/10/23. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse and Neglect Definition and Policy, undated, showed the following: -All allegations of abuse and neglect or allegations of neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, misappropriation of resident property, including of unknown origin injury will be reported to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report all allegations of abuse to management immediately and within two hours to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services- DHSS when staff reported one resident's (Resident #1) allegation of sexual abuse from another resident (Resident #2) five days after the facility staff became aware of the allegation. A sample of six residents was reviewed in a home with a census of 67. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse and Neglect Definition and Policy, undated, showed the following: -Abuse is the infliction of physical, sexual, or emotional injury or harm including financial exploitation by any person, firm, or corporation; -All employees are given a copy of mandated reporting in their personnel file upon hire; -All staff are required to report any concerns regarding resident to resident, staff to resident, or visitor to resident without fear of retaliation; -Families and staff are encouraged to report immediately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-05-12 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate one or more individuals, qualified by completing specialized training in infection prevention and control, as the Infection Preventionist (IP) responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program The facility had a census of 74. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding the role of Infection Preventionist. 1. During an interview on 05/09/23, at 9:10 A.M., the Associate Director of Nursing (ADON) said the facility did not have an actual active Infection Preventionist for about the last 30 days. During interviews on 05/12/23, at 9:25 A.M. and 1:27 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said in April 2023, the IP quit suddenly. They did not have a current trained IP. They did not have a policy for the IP. The IP position is full time position. During an interview on 05/12/23, at 3:46 P.M., the Administrator said their IP quit suddenly and she immediately posted it when it happened. She has hired a new nurse who has not had the training. The new nurse did not have the required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents with dignity and respect to enhance each residents' quality of life when staff stood while assisting residents, including five residents (Residents #62, #46, #11, #45, and #38) out of six sampled residents when assisting the residents with meals. The facility had a census of 74. Review of the facility policy Resident Rights, undated, showed the facility must promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of his or her individuality; Review of the facility policy, Feeding the Resident (Dependent Eating), undated, showed the following: -Take tray to resident and place tray directly in front of the resident; -Assist resident to proper sitting position unless contraindicated; -If the resident cannot see the tray, tell him/her the position of each item on the tray; -Cut or divide food into small portions and give resident a small amount at a time. Do not force the resident to eat. Select…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have physician orders for use of oxygen for two residents (Resident #74 and #44) and failed to have physician orders of when to change the oxygen tubing,failed to have documentation of when the oxygen tubing was changed, and failed to date the oxygen tubing when last changed for three residents (Resident #74, #44, and #60). A sample of 22 residents were selected out of a facility census of 74. Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, undated, showed the following: -The purpose of the policy is to administer oxygen to the resident when insufficient oxygen is being carried by the blood to the tissues; -Procedure for oxygen administration included check the physician's order for the liter and method of administration; -At regular intervals, check and clean oxygen equipment, masks, tubing, and cannulas; -At regular intervals, check liter flow contents of oxygen cylinder, fluid level in the humidifier and assess resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff stored, prepared, and served food in a manner that protected it from possible contamination in accordance with professional standards when staff failed to ensure pots and pans were cleanable, that staff wore beard nets as appropriate, and that vents, shelves, cords, lights, and ceilings were kept clean. The facility census was 74. Review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2017 Food Code showed that food shall be protected from environmental sources of contamination. 1. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding maintaining kitchen equipment. Review of the FDA 2017 Food Code showed equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch. The food-contact surfaces of cooking equipment and pans shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other soil accumulations. Observation on 05/08/23, beginning at 09:40 A.M., showed three large cooking pots had a build-up of black grime on the outside of the pots. Observation on 05/10/23, beginning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to adequately equip and maintain the resident call light system in resident bathrooms when call light cords were broken or tied up where residents could not access the pull cord for staff assistance. The facility census was 74. Review of the facility policy titled Call Light, Use of, undated, showed the following: -Check all call lights daily and report any defective call lights to the charge nurse immediately; -Log defective call lights, with exact location, in maintenance log if the facility has such a log; -Consider a quality assurance and assessment program to check call light system at regular intervals. 1. Observations on 05/08/23, beginning at 10:30 A.M., showed the following: -room [ROOM NUMBER] and 102, where two residents resided, in the resident bathroom next to the toilet the call light pull cord was broken and only approximately one inch long. The call light could not be easily accessed and triggered by the resident; -room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff maintained non-food contact surfaces in the kitchen in the a sanitary fashion when there was an accumulation of food, grime, trash, and stains throughout the floors in the kitchen. The facility census was 74. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding cleaning and maintaining the kitchen floors. Review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2017 Food Code showed non-food contact sufaces shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris. 1. Observations on 05/08/23, starting at 9:41 A.M., showed the following: -The floors behind and under the ice machine located in the kitchen had an accumulation of black grime and dirt and various trash items including paper and plastic cups, a paper muffin liner, and a marker; -The floors around the doors to the kitchen had a build-up of black grime; -The floors in the dry pantry under the metal storage shelves had a build-up of grime, food crumbs, and condiments packets; -The floor underneath the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan for two residents (Residents #129 an #13) out of a sample of 22 residents including two closed records. The facility had a census of 74. 1. Review of Resident #129's face sheet (a document that gives resident admission information at a quick glance) showed an admission date of 04/14/23. Review of the resident's medical record showed the following: -A tab for the baseline care plan; -A blank Baseline Care Plan Summary page; -The temporary/baseline care plan showed a place for staff to document initial goals, discharge plan, code status, diet order, current medications, therapy, and personal care and how often and provided by whom. During an interview on 05/12/23, at 1:10 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the resident did not have a baseline care plan - facility staff never completed it. 2. Review of Resident #13's face sheet showed an admission date of 03/14/23. Review on 05/12/23, at 10:48 A.M., of the resident's medical record showed the following: -A tab for the baseline care plan; -A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had a comprehensive care plan that addressed each resident's needs when staff failed to care plan one resident's (Resident #1's) use of antidepressant and antipsychotic medications with related monitoring and interventions and failed to care plan two residents' (Resident #1 and #2) elopement risk/wandering risk with related interventions. The facility census was 65. Review of the facility's policy titled Policy for Condition Changes, Hospitalizations, Related to MDS (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff) Process, undated, showed all residents will have MDS and care plans completed in a timely manner. Review of the facility's procedure titled, CAA (Care Area Assessment) Process and Care Planning, dated 10/2019, showed the following: -The comprehensive care plan is an interdisciplinary communication tool. It must include measurable objectives and time frames and describe the services that are to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-12 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's choice of code status was accessible to staff in the event of an emergency and matched throughout one resident's (Resident #230) medical record. Sample size was 22 residents in a facility census of 74. Review of the facility's policy titled Advanced Directive, undated, showed the following: -The facility will respect advance directives in accordance with state law; -Upon admission of a resident to the facility, the social service designee will provide written information to the resident concerning his/her right to make decisions concerning medical care, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment, and the right to formulate an advance directive; -Upon admission, a resident, and/or his/her family members, will be asked the existence of any written advance directives; -Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advance directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from significant medication errors when staff administered insulin medication (used to help control blood sugar levels) without priming the insulin pen per standards of practice prior to administering insulin to one resident (Resident #7) out of two residents administered insulin during a medication pass administration. The facility census was 74. Review of the facility policy, Insulin Administration Policy and Procedure, undated, showed if the insulin is available in a pen device, then a safety needle must be used, and the staff should prime the pen two units before use. Review of the How to Use Your Lantus SoloStar Pen, dated 2022, showed the following: -Dial a test dose of two units; -Hold pen with the needle pointing up and lightly tap the insulin reservoir so the air bubbles rise to the top of the needle. This will help you get the most accurate dose; -Press the injection button all the way in and check to see that insulin comes out of the needle. The dial will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medication were stored in accordance with accepted professional standards when staff stored intravenous medication (IV) in one resident's (Resident #53) unsecured room while the resident was in the hospital. The sample size was 22 residents in a facility census of 74. 1. Review of Resident #4's face sheet (brief information sheet about the resident) showed an admission date of 01/31/23. Review of the resident's Physician's Order Sheet (POS), current as of 05/06/23, showed the following: -An order, dated 04/25/23, to infuse ceftriaxone 2 gram IV over 30 minutes one time daily for 17 days for a urinary tract infection (UTI); -An order, dated 04/25/23, for sodium chloride reconstitute and infuse ceftriaxone 2 gram IV over 30 minutes one time daily for 17 days. Review of the resident's nurses' notes showed dated 05/07/23 showed the resident complained shortness of breath and tightness in his/her chest and requested to go to the emergency room for evaluation. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) transferred…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to practice acceptable standards of practice of infection control when failed to wash hands before applying gloves and after removing gloves during during incontinence care for one resident (Resident #62) and during wound care for one resident (Resident #4). A sample of 22 residents were reviewed in a facility with a census of 74. Review of the facility policy Handwashing, undated, showed staff were to thoroughly cleanse the hands with friction, soap, and water. Staff were to thoroughly wash hands before and after providing resident care. Review of the facility policy, Becoming a Certified Nurse Assistant, undated, showed the following: -Indications for hand hygiene included before and after all care procedures, before patient contact and donning gloves, between care activities, and after contact with patient's skin, contact with body fluids or excretions, non-intact skin, and wound dressings -When hands are visibly dirty,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2020-01-09 · tag F0923 — widespreadHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the residents' bathroom exhaust ventilation system in proper working condition when all residents' bathrooms did not have functioning exhaust vents. The facility had a capacity of 120 residents with a census of 58. 1. Observation on 1/9/2020, beginning at 8:30 A.M., showed the exhaust ventilation system, in all resident restrooms did not work when tested. During an interview on 1/9/2020, at approximately 1:15 P.M., the maintenance supervisor (MS) said he did not know the residents' bathroom exhaust system did not work The exhaust system worked off of a large fan located in the attic.
- Potential for harm · E2020-01-09 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative in writing of a transfer or discharge to a hospital, including the reasons for the transfer, and failed to provide the Ombudsman (a resident advocate who provides support and assistance with problems and/or complaints regarding the facility) a copy of the notification or complete monthly log as requested, for five residents (Resident #12, #16, #24, #25, and #36) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility failed to develop a policy regarding written notifications upon transfer to a hospital. The facility census was 59. 1. Record review of Resident #24's nurses' notes showed the following information: -On [DATE], 7:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M., staff documented the resident had an episode of extreme upper extremity tremors (an involuntary quivering movement), staff administered bedtime medications, including Klonopin (medication that works by calming your brain and nerves), the symptoms were alleviated, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-09 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to post the required daily nurse staffing hours in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors, failed to post it at the beginning of each shift, failed to include the facility name on the posting, and failed to maintain the posted daily nurse staffing data for a minimum of 18 months. The facility census was 59. 1. Observation on 1/6/2020, at 2:32 P.M., showed the nurse staffing hours posted in an alcove to the left side of the reception window, approximately 5 ½ feet high on the wall, and to the right side of a bin on the wall that held the state survey results. The posted hours were not visible to residents and visitors entering the building or while standing in the main entry. The information was only visible when standing at the reception desk. Observation on 1/7/2020, at 8:14 A.M., showed the nurse staffing hours, dated 1/6/2020, posted to the left side of the reception window, with a facility census of 59. Observation on 1/7/2020, at 9:57 A.M., showed the nurse staffing hours,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-09 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN - form CMS-10055) or a denial letter at the initiation, reduction, or termination of Medicare Part A benefits for two residents (Resident #36 and #56) out of two sampled residents who remained in the facility upon discharge from Medicare Part A services. The facility census was 59. Record review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Survey and Certification memo (S&C -09-20), dated 1/9/09, showed the following information: -The Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC - form CMS-10123) is issued when all covered Medicare services end for coverage reasons; -If the skilled nursing facility (SNF) believes on admission or during a resident's stay that Medicare will not pay for skilled nursing or specialized rehabilitative services and the provider believes that an otherwise covered item or service may be denied as not reasonable or necessary, the facility must inform the resident or his/her legal representative in writing why these…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$48,557 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $32,911 — penalty dated 2024-07-30
- $15,646 — penalty dated 2024-03-06
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-04 for 53 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBG HEALTH CARE IV, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/1989 |
| GOURLEY, EWING | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/10/1989 |
| BAKER, SUMMER | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 04/01/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $605K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265753. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.