No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Gardens Health And Rehab, The

1 Georgian Gardens Drive, Potosi, MO 63664 · For profit - Partnership · 120 certified beds · (573) 438-6261 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Aug 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation$8,021 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Aug 2024
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,021 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-18)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
200 Health Way Dr · (573) 438-2977 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
#1 Memorial Drive · (573) 438-3387 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
8 Parkway Shopping Ctr · (573) 436-9001 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Mark Twain National Forest · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased28.7%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.2%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.8%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.5%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.9%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened30.2%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication40.3%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine65.4%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.2%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.2%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table43.4%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.9%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine60.9%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.8%26.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.1%13.7%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.432.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.902.331.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.12U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.01hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.3–18.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.751.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
0.78
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.34
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.46
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
67.1%
Total nursing turnover
76.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 90.4 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-12)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2023-10-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide care in a sterile manner for one resident (Resident #4) of 11 sampled residents and did not assess or notify the physician when the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), (a long, flexible tube that is inserted into a vein in the arm and threaded into a large vein near the heart, used to deliver fluids, blood transfusions, medications, and nutrition intravenously, and to draw blood samples) line was cut during a dressing treatment and subsequently removed without a physician's order, placing the resident at risk for possible complication of a catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), which can occur when bacteria enter the bloodstream through the catheter site due to improper sterile technique, potentially leading to serious systemic infection. The facility census was 88. The Administrator was notified on 12/17/24 at 4:50 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 12/17/24. The IJ was removed on 12/17/24 as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-12 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the required members attended Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings at least quarterly. The facility's census was 87. The facility did not provide a policy. 1. Review of the monthly QAPI Meeting sign in sheets, dated August 2024, September 2024, October 2024, November 2024, December 2024, January 2025, and February 2025, provided by the Administrator, showed the following required members attended each meeting: - Administrator; - Director of Nursing; - Infection Preventionist; - At least two other staff members; - No record of the Medical Director attending any meetings. During an interview on 03/12/25 at 4:36 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the Medical Director is invited, but he does not come to the meetings. During an interview on 03/12/25 at 4:30 P.M., the Administrator said the Medical Director should be coming to the meetings.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean and comfortable homelike environment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility's census was 87. Review of the facility's policy titled, Shower Room, undated, showed: - Maintaining a clean and sanitary shower room in skilled nursing facilities is crucial for infection control and resident safety; - Shower rooms should be cleaned and disinfected daily, with increased frequency based on usage and facility needs; - High-touch surfaces and any visibly soiled areas should be cleaned and disinfected immediately after each use; - Remove any waste or disposable items from the area; - Apply detergent to all surfaces, including walls, floors, fixtures, and equipment; - Scrub surfaces to remove dirt and biofilm. Observations on 03/10/25 between 10:05 A.M. and 10:48 A.M. showed: - The A wing shower room between hallway 200 and 300 had two, 2 inch (in.) diameter piles of fecal material about 1 in. near the shower drain and the caulking around the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the ombudsman of all transfers to the hospital and failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of a transfer or discharge to a hospital, including the reasons for transfer for four residents (Resident #29, #57, #76, #83) out of 18 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #87) outside the sample. The facility's census was 87. The facility did not provide a policy. 1. Review of Resident #29's medical record showed: - admitted on [DATE]; - The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]; - No documentation that the resident's representative was informed in writing of the transfer/discharge to a hospital at the time of transfer; - Hospital transfer on 01/30/25 not included on the monthly list sent to the ombudsman. 2. Review of Resident #57's medical record showed: - admitted on [DATE]; - The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident's representative of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for five residents (Resident #29, #36, #57, #76, #83) out of 18 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #87) outside the sample. The facility's census was 87. Review of the facility's policy, Bed Holds and Returns, revised March 2017, showed: - Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed hold and return policy; - Prior to a transfer, written information will be given to the residents and the resident representatives that explains in detail: the rights and limitations of the resident regarding bed holds; the reserve bed payment policy as indicated by the state plan (Medicaid residents); the facility per diem rate required to hold a bed (non-Medicaid residents), or to hold a bed beyond the state bed-hold period (Medicaid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by the facility) within the required time frames for seven residents (Resident #29, #31, #36, #49, #52, #68, and #83) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility's census was 87. The facility did not provide a policy on completion of MDS assessments. Record review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual showed: - For the admission assessment, the MDS Completion Date (Z0500B) must be no later than 13 days after the Entry Date (A1600); - The ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of an assessment drives the due date of the next assessment. The next comprehensive assessment is due within 366 days after the ARD of the most recent comprehensive assessment; - For the admission assessment, the Care Area Assessment (CAA) Completion Date (V0200B2) must be no later than than 13 days after the Entry Date (A1600); - For the Annual assessment, the CAA Completion Date (V0200B2) must be no later than 14 days after the ARD (A2300). 1. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by the facility) assessment for two residents (Resident #52 and #56) out of 18 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #33) outside the sample. The facility's census was 87. The facility did not provide a policy that addressed the timely completion of significant change MDS assessments. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, revised October 2024, showed: - A significant change in status (SCSA) is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program (Medicare-certified or State-licensed hospice provider) or changes hospice providers and remains a resident at the nursing home. The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) must be within 14 days from the effective date of the hospice election (which can be the same or later than the date of the hospice election statement, but not earlier than). A SCSA must be performed regardless of whether an assessment was recently conducted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff) for one resident (Resident #52) out of 18 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #86) outside the sample. The facility's census was 87. Review of the facility's policy, Certifying Accuracy of the Resident Assessment, revised December 2009, showed all personnel who complete any portion of the Resident Assessment (MDS) must sign and certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) version 3.0 Manual showed: - Section O0110K1, Hospice care: Code residents identified as being in a hospice program for terminally ill persons where an array of services is provided for the palliation and management of terminal illness and related conditions; - Section A1805: Enter the two-digit code that best describes the setting the resident was in immediately preceding this admission/entry or reentry; - Section A1805: Code 04,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an accurate baseline care plan (the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident) upon admission with specific interventions for two residents (Residents #138 and #289) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility's census was 87. Review of the facility's policy, Care Plans-Baseline, undated, showed: - A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission; - The interdisciplinary team will review the healthcare practitioner's orders (e.g., dietary needs, medication, routine treatments, etc.) and implement a baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate care needs, including but not limited to: initial goals based on admission orders; physician orders; dietary orders; therapy services; social services; Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR - a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) recommendations, if applicable; -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized comprehensive care plan with specific interventions to meet the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for four residents (Residents #29, #47, #49, and #79) out of 18 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #86) outside the sample. The facility's census was 87. The facility did not provide a policy. 1. Review of Resident #29's medical record showed: - admission date of 11/15/24; - Diagnoses of muscle weakness, morbid obesity (a disorder that involves having too much body fat, which increases the risk of health problems), pain, and osteoarthritis of both hips (a chronic, degenerative joint disease that causes pain, stiffness, and loss of function in the affected joints); - On 11/16/24, a Bed Rail Assessment was completed with no side rails or assist bars indicated; - An order for horse shoe rails for positioning, dated 11/27/24; - An order for the audiologist to evaluate and treat, dated 2/27/25; - A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #29) out of one sampled resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and the resident's choices, related to pain management. The facility's census was 87. Review of the facility's policy, Pain Assessment and Management, revised March 2015, showed: - The purposes of this procedure are to help the staff identify pain in the resident, and to develop interventions that are consistent with the resident's goals and needs and that address the underlying causes of pain; - The pain management program is based on a facility-wide commitment to resident comfort; - Pain management is defined as the process of alleviating the resident's pain to a level that is acceptable to the resident and is based on his or her clinical condition and established treatment goals. 1. Review of Resident #29's medical record showed: - admission date of 11/15/24; - Diagnoses of muscle weakness, morbid obesity (a disorder that involves…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately assess residents for the use of side rails prior to installation or use, the facility failed to obtain informed consent from the resident or resident's representative, and the facility failed to provide on-going monitoring, supervision, and routine maintenance of the beds with side rails in use for two residents (Resident #29 and #47) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility's census was 87. The facility did not provide a policy on side rails. 1. Review of Resident #29's medical record showed: - admission date of 11/15/24; - Diagnoses of muscle weakness, morbid obesity (a disorder that involves having too much body fat, which increases the risk of health problems), pain, and osteoarthritis of both hips (a chronic, degenerative joint disease that causes pain, stiffness, and loss of function in the affected joints); - On 11/16/24, a Bed Rail Assessment was completed with no side rails or assist bars indicated; - An order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolated
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that three nursing assistants (NAs) completed a nursing assistant training program within four months of his/her employment at the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. The facility's census was 87. Review of the facility's policy, Nurse Aide Training Program, Purpose of, last revised December 2006, showed: - The primary purpose of the nurse aide training program is to prepare the individual for employment in a long-term care facility; - Provide each individual presently employed in the long-term care facility with an in-depth training program; - Provide each student with instructions on how to perform basic long-term care nursing procedures; - The policy did not address time frame in which NAs must become certified. 1. Review of Nursing Assistant H's personnel file and schedule showed: - Hire date of 09/11/24; - Not currently enrolled in a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) class; - Scheduled to work day shift on 03/01/25, 03/02/25, 03/05/35, 03/07/25, 03/10/25, 03/11/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement procedures to ensure medications were accurately administered, documented, and reconciled for one resident (Resident #29) of 18 sampled residents and failed to establish a system of records for the receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation of controlled medications to ensure nursing staff signed at the beginning and end of each shift. The facility failed to document the total number of narcotic drug cards counted for two of three narcotic count books checked. The facility's census was 87. Review of the facility's policy titled, Controlled Substances, revised December 2012, showed: - The facility shall comply with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of Schedule II and other controlled substances; - Nursing staff must count controlled medications at the end of each shift. The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty must make the count together. They must document and report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility's census was 87. Review of the facility's policy titled, Cleaning Rotation, dated 2011, showed: - Equipment and utensils will be cleaned according to the following guidelines or manufacturer's instructions; - Items cleaned daily: stove top, grill, exterior and large appliances, kitchen and dining room floors; - Items cleaned weekly: hoods, filters, storerooms. Review of the facility's policy titled, Steam Table Serving Temperatures for Hot and Cold Foods, dated 2011, showed: - Staff will follow the guidelines below when serving hot and cold beverages and food; - Foods will be served at the following temperatures to ensure a safe and appetizing dining experience; - Meat and casseroles at 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 170 degrees F; - Dairy products 41 degrees F or below. 1. Observation on 03/09/25 at 9:58 A.M. and 03/12/25 at 12:40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices to prevent the development and transmission of infection for ten residents (Resident #6, #14, #19, #37, #38, #57, #70, #72, #78, and #79) out of the 14 sampled residents. The facility's census was 87. Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene Policy and Procedure, dated 2025, showed: - The purpose is to establish clear and standardized hand hygiene practices for all staff to prevent the spread of infections, maintain a safe environment, and comply with CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CDC (Centers for Disease Control), and state infection control guidelines. This policy includes specific hand hygiene practices related to peri care (the cleaning of the the genitals and anal area) to minimize the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and other infections; - This policy applies to all facility staff, including nurses, Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs), therapists, dietary staff, housekeeping, and any personnel with direct or indirect resident contact;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document pertinent education provided to the resident or the resident's representative regarding benefits, side effects, or warnings of the influenza (a viral respiratory infection) and/or the pneumococcal (an infectious lung disease) vaccine for two residents (Residents #36 and #47) out of five sampled residents. The facility's census was 87. The facility did not provide a policy regarding influenza or pneumococcal vaccination. 1. Review of Resident #36's medical record showed: - admission date of 04/24/20; - No documentation the facility provided information and education for influenza or pneumococcal vaccinations; - No documentation of consent or refusal; - No documentation the influenza or the pneumococcal vaccinations had been administered. 2. Review of Resident #47's medical record showed: - admission date of 06/17/24; - An incomplete Pneumococcal and Influenza Immunization consent form, signed by the representative on 06/17/24, that did not state whether or not the resident was to receive vaccinations; - No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Covid-19 (an infectious disease caused by a virus that could cause some people to become seriously ill and require medical attention) vaccination was offered, administered, or refused by the resident and/or resident's representative for three residents (Resident #36, #47 and #56) out of five sampled residents. The facility's census was 87. Review of the facility's Immunization Policy, undated, showed: - The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) mandates that all long term care facilities develop and implement policies to ensure that all staff are fully vaccinated against Covid-19. This includes educating residents and staff about benefits and potential side effects of the Covid-19 vaccine and offering the vaccine to them; - Facilities are expected to have processes in place to track and securely document the vaccination status of all staff and residents. 1. Review of Resident #36's medical record showed: - admission date of 04/24/20; - Diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (a condition that includes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to conduct regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, side rails, and enabler bars as part of a regular maintenance program for two residents (Residents #29 and #47) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility's census was 87. The facility did not provide a policy on inspection of side rails. 1. Review of Resident #29's medical record showed no maintenance inspection for the side rails. Observations of the resident showed: - On 03/09/25 at 12:54 P.M., half rails up on both sides and resident leaning to the right against bed rail; - On 03/11/25 at 2:00 P.M., half rails up on both sides and resident leaning to the right against bed rail. 2. Review of Resident #47's medical record showed no maintenance inspection for the side rails. Observations of the resident showed: - On 03/10/25 at 10:30 A.M., Resident lay in bed, grab bar up on left side of bed, right side of bed against the wall; - On 03/11/25 at 2:40 P.M., Resident out of room, grab bar up on left side of bed, right side of bed against the wall; - On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required annual competency training for dementia care (care of a resident with an impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions) and/or have staff attend at least twelve hours of in-service education per year for two of three sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs). This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. The facility's census was 87. The facility did not provide a policy. 1. Review of CNA E's in-service record showed: - A hire date of 07/12/89; - A total of twelve hours of annual in-services for March 2024 through February 2025; - No documented annual dementia care training. 2. Review of CNA F's in-service record showed: - A hire date of 03/28/23; - A total of four hours of annual in-services for March 2024 through February 2025; - No documented annual dementia care training. During an interview on 03/12/25 at 3:50 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said she provides some in-service videos on the staff's communication app. There are no written in-services on dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) out of five sampled residents was free of misappropriation of his/her property when Housekeeper A utilized the resident's bank card for his/her own personal use. The facility census was 62. The administrator was notified of the Past Non-Compliance (PNC) on 08/23/24. The PNC started on 07/28/24 and was removed on 07/30/24, when the incident was reported to the Administrator who immediately began an investigation and removed the housekeeper from the facility then completed the facility policy and procedure on misapprorpiation, reporting and retraining staff The PNC was removed on 07/30/24. Review of the facility's policy titled, Standards of Conduct, dated May 2023, showed violation of the Conduct Standards include, but are not limited to: stealing from a resident, visitor, other employee of facility showed the first offense to be a discharge. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet showed: - admitted on [DATE]; -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 65. Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality of Life - Homelike Environment, undated, showed: - Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible; - The facility staff and management shall maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting, including a clean, sanitary and orderly environment. Observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] showed: - On 10/24/23 at 11:59 A.M., the top right corner of the heating and air unit pulled away from the wall with daylight showing through a one inch (in.) open crack across the corner; - On 10/26/23 at 9:20 A.M., the bed rolled a few in. across the floor as the resident tried to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a federally mandated assessment to be completed by the facility staff) for three residents (Resident #23, #45 and #48) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 65. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, undated, showed: - A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; - The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment; - Areas of concern that are identified during the resident assessment will be evaluated before interventions are added to the care plan. Review of the Residents' Smoking List, dated 10/11/23, showed: - Resident #23 smoked while supervised by staff. - Resident #45 and #48…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a care plan with specific interventions tailored to meet individual needs of three residents (Resident #15, #45, and #48) out of 16 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #35) outside the sample. The facility census was 65. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, undated, showed: - A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; - The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment; - Areas of concern that are identified during the resident assessment will be evaluated before interventions are added to the care plan. 1. Review of Resident 15's medical record showed: - admission date of 10/25/21; - Diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician's orders for one resident (Resident #2) out 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 65. Review of the facility's policy titled, Physician's Orders, undated, showed: - Our facility shall promptly obtain physician orders for accident, discovery of injuries of an unknown source, an incident involving the resident and specific instruction to notify the physician of changes in the resident's condition; - Prior to notifying the physician or healthcare provider, the nurse will make detailed observations and gather relevant and pertinent information for the provider; - The nurse will record in the resident's medical record information relative to changes in the resident's medical/mental condition or status; - The policy did not address a colostomy (a surgical operation in which a piece of the colon is diverted to an artificial opening in the abdominal wall so as to bypass a damaged part of the colon) and/or urostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening for the urinary system) care. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices during incontinent care for one resident (Resident #38) out of six sampled residents, and for the disinfection of a glucometer (a device for measuring the concentration of glucose in the blood) used for glucose (the main type of sugar in the blood) monitoring for three residents (Resident #24, #30, and #47) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 65. Review of the facility's policy, titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, dated 10/11/22 showed: - The facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infection; - All personnel shall be trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of healthcare-associated infections; - All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors; - Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62 percent (%) alcohol; or, alternatively, soap (antimicrobial or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident's (Resident #1) right to be free from verbal abuse when Registered Nurse (RN) C yelled, cursed, and threatened to withhold cigarettes from the resident in order to force the resident's compliance with incontinence care. The facility census was 64. The Administration was notified on 09/12/23 of the Past Non-Compliance citation on 09/06/23. On 09/06/23, facility staff took appropriate corrective actions as confirmed by survey staff during the onsite visit. The facility started an investigation, and assessed Resident #1. The facility started an in-service that covered abuse and neglect. The deficiency was corrected on 09/06/23. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Freedom from Misappropriation of Property and Exploitation and Procedure, not dated, showed: - Enable any and all owners, directors, officers, clinical staff, employees, independent contractors, consultants, and others working for the facility to do all that is within their power to ensure that residents are free from abuse, neglect,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update and revise care plans with specific interventions tailored to meet individualized needs for three residents (Residents #33, #51, and #40) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 64. 1. Record review of Resident #33's Face sheet, showed: - admission date 4/14/2015; - Diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) a group of lung diseases that block air flow making it difficult to breathe, tracheostomy (trach, tube surgically inserted into the trachea for breathing) . Review of the resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/10/21 showed: - Section O, special treatment for tracheostomy care while a resident marked. Review of Resident #33's Physician's Order Sheet (POS), dated November 2021, showed: - An order to clean tracheostomy and change inner cannula every two days. Review of the resident's comprehensive care plan, last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to follow physician orders for two residents (Resident #22 and #214) out 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 64. 1. Record review of Resident #22's medical record, showed: -An admission face sheet, admission date of 2/22/17; -Diagnoses included morbid obesity due to excess calories and major depression (a serious medical illness that negatively affects how you feel, the way you think and how you act). Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 5/13/21, showed: -Alert and oriented; -No behaviors for rejection of care; -Required extensive to total assistance from one to two staff for activities of daily living (ADLs); -Non-ambulatory; -No impaired range of motion affecting upper/lower extremities. Review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated October 2021, showed: -An order dated 10/5/21, for physical therapy to evaluate the resident one time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) receives the necessary services to maintain adequate grooming, bathing and nail care had been completed for three residents (Resident #21, #22, and #38) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 64. 1. Record review of the facility's Shower/Tub Bath Policy/Procedure, dated October 2020, showed: -Purpose: The purposes of this procedure are to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the residents and to observe the condition of the resident's skin; -Documentation: The following information should be recorded in the resident's ADL record and/or in the resident's medical record; 1. The date and time the shower/tub bath was performed. 2. The name and title of the individuals who assisted the resident with the shower/tub bath; 3. All assessment data (any redness and/or sore on the resident's skin) obtained during the shower/tub bath; 4. How the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to recognize, evaluate and address the nutritional needs of one resident (Resident #3) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility's census was 64. Record review of the facility's policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention, dated September 2008, showed: - The nursing staff will measure resident weights on admission, the next day, and weekly for two weeks thereafter. If no weight concerns are noted at this point, weights will be measured monthly thereafter; - Each weight will be recorded in each unit's Weight Record chart; - Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken the next day for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the dietician in writing; - The Dietician will respond within 24 hours of receipt of notification; - The Dietician will review the Weight Record by the 15 th of the month to follow individual weight trends; - Negative trends will be evaluated by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide tracheostomy (trach, tube surgically inserted into the trachea for breathing) care consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to change the inner cannula (IC) every other day as ordered by the physician for one resident (Resident #33) out of one sampled resident. The facility census was 64. 1. Record review of Resident #33's Face sheet, showed: - admission date 4/14/2015; - Diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (a group of lung diseases that block air flow making it difficult to breathe) and Tracheostomy. Record review of the resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/10/21 showed: - Section O, special treatment for tracheostomy care. Record review of Resident #33's Physician's Order Sheet (POS), dated November 2021, showed: - An order to clean tracheostomy and change the IC every two days. Record review of the resident's Treatment Administration Record (TAR), showed: - The September 2021 TAR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide thorough assessments, orders, monitoring and on-going communication with dialysis (process for removal of waste and excess water from the blood due to kidney failure) center for one resident (Resident #40) out of a sample of two residents receiving dialysis treatments. The facility census was 64. Review of the facility's Dialysis-General Guidelines and Management Policy/Procedure, dated May 2017, showed: -Policy: -It is the policy of this home that dialysis residents will receive services as per physician's orders and will be monitored accordingly; -Hemo-Dialysis involves shunting the resident's blood from the body through a dialyzer (machine used in dialysis treatments) in which diffusion and ultrafiltration occur and back into the resident's circulation. To perform hemo-dialysis there must be access to the resident's blood, a mechanism to transport the blood to and from the dialyzer, and a dialyzer (area in which the exchange of fluid electrolytes and waste products occurs). This dialysis access is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff dated insulin vials and Flexpens (prefilled injectable insulin) once they were opened and discard outdated insulin vials for two of two medication carts checked and failed to store all drugs under proper temperature controls in the medication refrigerator on the B hall. The facility census was 64. 1. Review of the facility's Insulin Administration Policy, dated September 2014, showed: -Purpose: To provide guidelines for the safe administration of insulin to residents with diabetes mellitus (DM, condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar); -Preparation: The nursing staff will have access to specific instructions (from the manufacturer if appropriate) on all forms of insulin delivery systems prior to use; -Steps in the procedure (insulin injections); -Check expiration date, if drawing from an opened multi-dose vial. If opening a new vial, record the expiration date and time on the vial (follow manufacturer recommendations for expiration after opening); -The facility's policy did not address…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,021 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-12-18
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-01-23 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$590K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 83%Medicare 5%Other / private 12%

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $590K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$227per resident / day
operating cost
$6,894per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$217per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265516. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next