Schuyler County Nursing Home District
1306 Us Highway 63, Queen City, MO 63561 · Government - County · 60 certified beds · (660) 766-2291 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 26.6% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 14.4% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 6.6% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 7.5% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.3% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.7% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.7% | 17.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.1% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.7% | 17.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.0% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.4% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 86.2% | 63.5% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.8% | 26.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 21.7% | 13.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.59 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.10 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 46.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 46% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.1%CMS range 34.6–61.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 6.5–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 34.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.8%CMS range 4.5–15.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.79 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 46.6 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.89 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.38 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food service equipment/surfaces were appropriately cleaned under sanitary conditions in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, and failed to ensure trash cans were covered when not in use. The facility census was 41.Observations on 9/7/25 between 11:30 A.M. and 5:53 P.M., and on 9/8/25 between 9:27 A.M. and 9:42 A.M., in the kitchen showed the following:-The kitchen Heating Ventilation and Air-Conditioning System (HVAC) unit surfaces/supports above the upright refrigerator, two compartment food prep sink, and two spice/seasoning shelves, with a moderate to heavy buildup of dust and debris;-A two-bulb emergency light fixture above two spice/seasoning shelves, with a moderate buildup of dust and debris;-Between and above the food tray prep table and coffee maker/clean glassware areas, three ceiling light fixtures, connecting flex conduit and ceiling chain supports with a moderate to heavy buildup of dust and debris;-Under the hand washing sink beside the coffee machine, a trash can containing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop policies to monitor the water system and implement the facility policy to monitor for Legionella (a bacterium that can cause a serious type of pneumonia called Legionnaires' Disease (a bacterial disease commonly associated with water-based aerosols) in persons at risk) control that included specific control parameters based on Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)) standards. The facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene when providing incontinence care to four residents (Resident #3, #6, #40, #28), failed to ensure the urinary catheter drainage system was maintained off the floor for two residents (Residents #3 and #40), and to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for one resident (Resident #3) who had a urinary catheter, in a review of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 41. 1. Review of the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-10 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff training needs, as identified in the facility assessment and the annual in-servicing calendar, were met for five nurse assistants (NA)'s/ certified nurse assistants (CNA)'s (NA O , NA J, CNA T, CNA K and CNA/Certified Medication Technician (CMT) S), in a sample of five NA's/CNA's reviewed, who had been employed over a year by the facility. Further review showed no documentation of the required 12 hours of training per year were completed, including dementia management and resident abuse prevention training. The facility census was 41. Review of the facility Assessment, dated 04/17/25, showed the following education requirements:-Communication - effective communications for direct care staff;-Resident's rights and facility responsibilities - ensure that staff members are educated on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents;-Abuse, neglect, and exploitation - training that at a minimum educates staff on-(1) Activities that constitute abuse, neglect,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment (minimum data set, MDS) for three residents (Resident #5, #7, and #36)), in a review of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 41. Review of the facility policy, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised 2022, showed the following:-A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident;- The interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident;-The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for five residents (Resident's #5, #11, #28, #34, #40) in a sample of 17 residents. The facility failed to follow physician's orders related to daily weights and administering Lasix (a diuretic) according to parameters set by the physician to ensure the resident did not experience fluid overload for Resident #11. The facility failed to follow physician's orders related to fluid restrictions, administering Lasix according to parameters set by the physician, and to check daily weights, according to the parameters set on the Lasix order, to ensure the resident did not experience fluid overload for Resident #5. The facility failed to follow physician's orders related to weight loss and notifying the physician and/or dietician when a significant or severe weight loss occurred for Residents #40, #28 and #34. The facility census was 41. Review of the facility policy Medication Orders, dated November 2014,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess the residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails and failed to complete inspections of bed frames, mattresses and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for four residents (Residents #40, #5, #7, and #14), in a review of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 41. During an interview on 09/09/10:15 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the facility did not have a policy for bed rails. 1. Review of Resident #40's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument, dated 8/08/25, showed the following:-Diagnoses of dementia and need for assistance with personal care; -Severe cognitive impairment;-Required substantial/maximal assistance for mobility and transfers. Review of the resident's Care Plan, dated 8/05/25, showed the following: -The resident was at risk for falls;-He/She required assistance from one staff for transfers and bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure seven nurse aides (NAs) completed a state-approved training program within four months of hire. The facility census was 41. Review of the facility policy, Nurse Aid Qualifications and Training Requirements, revised August 2022, showed the following:-Nurse aides must undergo a state-approved training program;-The facility will not employ any individual as a nurse aide for more than four months, full-time, temporary, per diem, or otherwise, unless: a. That individual is competent to provide designated nursing care and nursing related services, and; b. That individual has completed a training program and competency evaluation program, or a competency evaluation program approved by the state or that individual has been deemed competent as provided in S483. IS0(a) and (b) of the requirements of participation;-Nursing assistants failing to successfully complete the required training program within the first four months of their date of employment may be terminated from employment or may be reassigned to non-nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a 14 day stop date on as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication for two residents (Residents #11 and #28), in a review of 17 sampled residents, and did not provide documentation of a clinical reason to extend the PRN medication beyond 14 days. Resident #11's PRN antipsychotic medication was administered for reasons that were not approved and lacked documentation of why the medication was administered. The facility census was 41. Review of drugs.com showed the following:-Seroquel is an antipsychotic medication that may increase the risk of death in older adults with mental health problems related to dementia.-Seroquel can cause a serious heart problem. Your risk may be higher if you also use certain other medicines for infections, asthma, heart problems, high blood pressure, depression, mental illness, and cancer.-Seroquel is approved for use for:-Schizophrenia in adults and children who are at least [AGE] years old.-Used alone or with divalproex…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change in status assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be completed by facility staff, for two residents ( Residents #4 and #6), in a review of 17 sampled residents, within 14 days after the facility determined, or should have determined, there had been a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition which had an impact on more than one area of the resident's health status and required interdisciplinary review and/or revision of the care plan. The facility census was 41. Review of the Long Term Care Facility RAI User's Manual, version 3.0 showed a significant change is a decline or improvement in a resident's status that:-Will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions and is not self-limiting;-Impacts more than one area of the resident's health status;-Requires…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and oversight to prevent falls for one resident (Resident #20), in a review of 17 sampled residents. The resident experienced multiple falls and was high risk for falls. The facility failed to plan and reevaluate interventions to address the resident's falls. The facility did not have a consistent system to identify residents at risk for falls. The facility census was 41. Review of the undated facility policy, Resident Safety and Fall Management, showed the following:-The facility will implement comprehensive fall prevention and post fall management;-All residents will undergo a fall risk assessment upon admission and periodically thereafter;-An event checklist will be utilized that includes evaluation of environmental hazards, mobility status, medication review and individualized care needs;-Staff are responsible for implementing appropriate interventions such as ensure proper lighting, nonslip footwear,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and reevaluate indications for use of indwelling urinary catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) to prevent complications including urinary tract infections (UTI) for two residents (Resident #4 and #6), of 17 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure that catheters were secured to the resident's leg with a device to reduce friction and movement at the site (also decreasing the chance of accidental removal and infection). The facility census was 41. Review of the facility policy, Urinary Catheter Care, revised October 2010, showed the following:-The purpose of this procedure is to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including urinary tract infections;-Ensure that the catheter remains secured with a securement device to reduce friction and movement at the insertion site;-Review and document the clinical indications for catheter use prior to inserting;-Nursing and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for colostomy (a surgical opening in the large intestine also called a stoma) care and failed to develop a plan of care to address the care and monitoring of the colostomy for one resident (Resident #40), in a review of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 41. Review of the facility policy, Medication Orders, last revised November 2014, showed the following:-Current list of orders must be maintained in the clinical record for each resident;-Treatment orders must specify the treatment, frequency and duration of the treatment. 1. Review of Resident #40's Care Plan, dated 7/15/25, showed the following: -The resident had a colostomy; -Staff to wear gloves and gowns when assisting him/her with dressing, toileting or emptying the colostomy;(The resident's care plan did not address the care, treatment, and monitoring of the resident's colostomy.) Review of resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment, dated 8/08/25, showed the following:-Diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently monitor residents' weights as ordered, failed to identify weight loss and notify the resident's physician and the dietician of the weight loss, failed to ensure staff evaluated current interventions and/or implemented new interventions to prevent further weight loss for two residents (Residents #2 and #39), in a review of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 41.Review of the facility policy Nutrition (Impaired)/Unplanned Weight Loss, last revised September 2017, showed the following:-The staff will report to the physician significant weight gains or losses or any abrupt or persistent change from baseline appetite or food intake;-The physician will review for medical causes of weight gain, anorexia and weight loss before ordering interventions;-The staff and physician will identify pertinent interventions based on identified causes and overall resident condition, prognosis and wishes;-The staff and physician will review and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Director had the appropriate competencies and skills set to carry out the function of the food and nutrition services. The facility census was 41.Review of the facility's current employee list, dated 9/7/25, showed the Dietary Director began employment with the facility on 5/9/22. Review of the facility's signed, undated Dietary Supervisor Responsibilities, showed the following:-Oversee daily food service operations to ensure the preparation and delivery of nutritious, appealing meals in accordance with dietary guidelines and residents' individual needs;-Develop, review, and update menus in collaboration with dietitians and management to meet nutritional standards and resident preferences;-Create, manage, and coordinate monthly work schedules for dietary department staff to ensure adequate coverage and efficient operation;-Supervise, train, and evaluate dietary staff, including cooks and aides;-Ensure proper food handling, sanitation and safety procedures are always followed in accordance with heath…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary practices in the kitchen. Staff did not perform proper handwashing technique during meal preparation, did not store food items and maintain and clean equipment under sanitary conditions, and did not maintain a clean and sanitary environment in the kitchen. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility policy, Preventing Foodborne Illness - Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices, revised December 2008, showed the following: -Employees must wash their hands: -After handling raw meat, poultry or fish and when switching between working with raw food and working with ready-to-eat food; -After handling soiled equipment or utensils; -During food preparation, as often as necessary to remove soil and contamination and to prevent cross contamination when changing tasks; -After engaging in other activities that contaminate hands; -Gloves are considered single-use items and must be discarded after completing the task for which they are used; -The use of disposable gloves does not substitute for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff washed their hands and changed soiled gloves after each direct resident contact and when indicated by professional standards of practice during care for two residents (Resident #9 and Resident #12), in a review of 14 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure proper infection control was utilized for respiratory care supplies for five residents (Resident #4, #7, #18, #30 and #289). The facility failed to ensure procedures were implemented to address prevention of Tuberculosis (TB) for four newly hired employees (Activity Director, Dietary Aide I, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) J and Registered Nurse (RN) K) of ten new employees reviewed, when the facility failed to ensure Tuberculin Skin Tests (TST) were completed in accordance with the requirements for TB testing for long-term care employees. The facility failed to develop a policy to address Legionella Control that included specific control parameters based on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespreadMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to have an adequate audible system for the residents to signal the nursing staff when they were in need of staff assistance. The facility also failed to ensure one resident (Resident #21)'s call light functioned properly when the light did not illuminate above the resident's door. The facility census was 37. The facility did not provide a policy regarding the resident call light system. Review of the DHSS exception log showed the facility did not have an approved exception for a wireless call light system. 1. Review of Resident #21's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/26/23 showed the following: -Short and long term memory problems; -Dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, sitting to lying, sit to stand, and chair/bed to chair transfer; -Frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel; -Diagnoses of osteoporosis, fracture, dementia and anxiety; -Two or more no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update interventions in the resident's care plan to reflect current care needs for three residents (Resident #10, #12 and #25), in a review of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility's policy, Care Plans-Comprehensive, revised 2010, showed the following: -An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident; -The facility's care planning/Interdisciplinary team, in coordination with the resident, his/her family or representative, develops and maintains a comprehensive care plan for each resident that identifies the highest level of functioning the resident may be expected to attain; -The comprehensive care plan is based on a thorough assessment that includes, but is not limited to, the MDS; -Each resident's comprehensive care plan is designed to: -a. Incorporate identified problem…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three nurse aides (NA C, NA D and NA E) completed a nurse aide training program within four months of their employment in the facility. The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the undated list of NA's employed by the facility showed the following: -NA C's date of hire was 2/27/23; -NA D's date of hire was 5/15/23; -NA E's date of hire was 2/27/23. 2. Review of NA C's employee file showed no documentation he/she completed a nurse aide training program within four months of his/her hire date. 3. Review of NA D's employee file showed no documentation he/she completed a nurse aide training program within four months of his/her hire date. 4. Review of NA E's employee file showed no documentation he/she completed a nurse aide training program within four months of his/her hire date. During an interview on 12/13/23 at 3:00 P.M. NA D said he/she was working evening shift. He/she was working full time and was not enrolled in Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) class. During an interview on 12/13/23 at 10:15 A.M. and 12:55 P.M. the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to adequately document appropriate diagnoses of residents or resident behaviors to justify the implementation or continued used of antipsychotic medications (a type of psychiatric medication used to treat certain types of mental health problems, such as schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly) and bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), for three residents (Residents #10, #21 and #25) in a review of 14 sampled residents. The facility also failed to complete a 14 day review for the as-needed (PRN) use of a benzodiazepine (a drug that produces sedation and hypnosis) for one resident (Resident #21) and one additional resident (Resident #34). The facility census was 37. A review of the facility policy, Antipsychotic Medication Use, dated 3/16/23, showed the following: -Policy Statement: Antipsychotic medications may…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep the medication cart containing drugs and biologicals locked when not in use. The cart remained unlocked for the entire morning medication pass. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility's undated storage of medication policy showed the following: -The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner; -Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others. Observation on 12/12/23 at 5:30 A.M. showed Certified Medication Technician (CMT) P entered room [ROOM NUMBER]-1 to administer medications to the resident. CMT P left the medication cart unlocked and unattended in the hallway. Observation on 12/12/23 at 5:40 A.M. showed CMT P entered room [ROOM NUMBER] again to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow menus for three sampled residents (Residents #12, #18 and#25) and five additional residents (Residents #4, #6, #13, #22 and #23) on therapeutic diets to ensure staff served the proper food items and portion sizes as directed. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility policy, Menus, revised December 2008, showed menus shall meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, and be followed. 1. Review of the Diet Orders, provided by the facility, showed four residents (Residents #4, #6, #12 and #25) had physician's orders for a diabetic (consistent carbohydrate) diet. Review of the spreadsheet menu for the lunch meal on 12/11/23 showed staff was to serve residents on a consistent carbohydrate (CCHO) diet a 3-ounce portion of macaroni and tomatoes. Observation on 12/11/23 during the lunch meal service between 11:55 A.M. and 12:42 P.M., showed [NAME] Q served all four residents on a diabetic/CCHO diet a 4-ounce portion macaroni and tomatoes. Review of the spreadsheet menu for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standards of practice and ensure proper administration of physician ordered insulin (medication used to treat diabetes) via an insulin pen for one resident (Resident #6), in a review of 14 sampled residents. Staff failed to hold the insulin pen in place for the appropriate amount of time during administration per policy and per the manufacturer's instructions. Failure to follow this procedure for administration results in residents not receiving the ordered dose of insulin. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility's policy, Insulin Administration, dated 6/14/23, showed to depress the plunger and remove the needle after approximately five seconds. Review of the Novolog (fast acting insulin) Flex Pen manufacturer instructions, last revised February 2023, showed the following: -Put the needle into the skin all the way; -Keep the button pressed and slowly count to ten before taking the needle out of the skin. 1. Review of Resident #6's Continuity of Care Document (CCD) showed the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff safely transferred one resident (Resident #12), who had left side weakness and required two staff assistance for transfers, in a review of 14 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure staff transported two residents (Resident #14 and #18) safely in wheelchairs with foot rests/pedals. During staff transport of Resident #18, his/her feet touched the floor and he/she fell forward, out of the wheelchair, striking his/her forehead on the floor. During staff transport of Resident #14, his/her feet drug the ground and caused the resident to jolt forward in his/her wheelchair. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility's undated policy, Wheelchair Pedals, showed the following: -All residents who require staff to propel them in a wheelchair are to have bilateral pedals on; -This is to ensure the resident's safety; -If a resident is refusing pedals, education needs to be provided to that resident and their person; -A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to an urinary catheter (a sterile tube inserted through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine) consistent with acceptable standards of practice, for two residents with a urinary catheter (Residents #4 and #18), in a review of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 37. Review of the Nurse Assistant in a Long Term Care Facility, 2001 revision, showed the following: -The bladder is considered sterile, the catheter, drainage tubing and bag are a sterile system; -Drainage tubing/bags must not touch the floor. Review of the facility policy, Catheter Care and Emptying Drainage Bag, dated 4/5/23, showed the following: -The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter associated urinary tract infections; -Keep drainage bag below the bladder level and be sure bag/tubing is free from the floor contact. Place drainage bag into protective cover. 1. Review of Resident #18's Continuity of Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer the correct dosage of levothyroxine (a medication to treat hypothyroidism, a condition in which the thyroid doesn't produce enough thyroid hormone) from the order date of 10/4/23 through 12/12/23 for one resident (Resident #33), in a review of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility's undated policy, Medication Error, showed the following: -A medication error is the failure to administer medications as prescribed and/or the administration of medication not prescribed by a licensed physician/nurse practitioner/physician's assistant, e.g. incorrect dosage, time of administration and/or route, and omission of dosages; -Medication errors include the medication was given in the wrong dosage. Review of Drugs.com for levothyroxine (a medication to treat hypothyroidism, a condition in which the thyroid doesn't produce enough thyroid hormone) showed the following: -Take levothyroxine exactly as prescribed by your physician; -Taking more than the recommended dose will not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-01-05 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified director of food and nutrition services. The facility did not have a dietary manager (DM) with a background and/or training in food preparation, food service and/or food storage. The facility also did not utilize the services of their qualified, consultant Registered Dietitian (RD) to assist the DM. This practice effected all residents in a facility with a census of 40. Record review of the facility's Dietitian policy, from MED-PASS 2001, revised October 2017 showed under policy interpretation and implementation #1. A qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional will help oversee food and nutrition services provided to the residents; #2 A food and nutrition services manager will oversee the productions, storage, and delivery of food. The dietitian will work closely with the Food and Nutrition services manager and clinical staff. #7 if a dietitian is not employed full timed (35 or more hours per week) a director of food service management will be designated. this individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-01-05 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer with required information (reason for transfer/discharge, date of transfer/discharge, location to which the resident is transferred or discharged , appeal rights and contact information, ombudsman contact information) to the resident and/or resident representative for three residents (Resident #17, 18, and #39) in a review of 12 sampled residents, and one closed record (Resident #140) when the facility initiated transfer to the hospital. The facility census was 40. During an interview on 12/29/20, at 1:33 P.M., the administrator said the facility does not have a policy on discharge notices for facility initiated discharges. 1. Review of Resident #17's medical record showed the following: -Original admission date of 7/27/18; -Resident was discharged to the emergency room (ER) for evaluation and treatment on 9/25/20; -There was no documentation the facility provided notice to the resident or resident's representative.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-01-05 · tag F0637 — patternAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change in status assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be completed by facility staff) for three residents (Residents #17, #18, and #29) in a review of 12 sampled residents, within 14 days after the facility determined, or should have determined, there had been a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition which had an impact on more than one area of the resident's health status and required interdisciplinary review and/or revision of the care plan. The census was 40. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, dated 10/1/17, directs staff as follows: -Comprehensive Assessments are required comprehensive assessments include the completion of both the Minimum Data Set (MDS) and the Care Area Assessment (CAA) process, as well as care planning. Comprehensive assessments are completed upon admission, annually, and when a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-01-05 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review the baseline care plan with the resident/responsible party within 48 hours of admission, or provide a copy of the baseline care plan to the resident/responsible party for four residents (Resident #25, #29, #32 and #241) in a review of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 40. 1. During an interview on 12/30/20, at 3:30 P.M., the assistant administrator said the facility did not have a policy for baseline care plans. 2. Review of Resident #25's face sheet showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's admission Assessment, dated 8/25/20, showed the resident admitted at 11:55 A.M., and transferred with one person assist with a cane or walker. Review of the resident's Bed Rail Consent, dated 8/25/20, showed the resident was to use soft care assist rail on bilateral upper bed. Review of the resident's baseline care plan, undated, showed the following: -Safety Care section did not include walker and cane…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-01-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update interventions in the resident's care plan to reflect current care needs for six residents (Resident #7, #9, #17, 19, #22, and #39) in a sample of 12 residents. The facility census was 40. Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.17.1, Chapter 4, dated October 2019, showed the following: -The care plan is driven not only by identified resident issues and/or conditions but also by a resident's unique characteristics, strengths, and needs; -A care plan that is based on a thorough assessment, effective clinical decision making, and is compatible with current standards of clinical practice can provide a strong basis for optimal approaches to quality of care and quality of life needs of individual residents; -A well developed and executed assessment and care plan: 1. Looks at each resident as a whole human being with unique characteristics and strengths; 2. Views the resident in distinct…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-01-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 7. Review of Resident #25's admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Independent with eating; -Not taking diuretics; -Weighs 280 lbs. Review of the resident's Weight Record showed the resident's weight on 11/11/20 was 280 lbs. Review of the resident's Physician's Orders dated 11/23/20, showed the physician ordered bumetanide (a strong diuretic 'water pill'), 2 milligrams (mg) once a day. Review of the resident's laboratory results, dated 11/24/20, showed the following: -Brain neuropeptic peptides (BNP) (measure of protein produced in the heart when it is enlarged with fluid, normal range is less than 1800 for this resident) was 6948 critically high; -Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (measure of how well kidneys are working, normal is 8-23) was 39 high. Review of the resident's significant change MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Took diuretics six out of seven days. Review of the resident's laboratory results, dated 12/1/20, showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-01-05 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to assess residents for risk of entrapment, document attempted alternatives prior to installing a bed rail, or provide informed consent on the safety risk associated with bed rail use for five residents (Resident #18, #7, #25, #29, and #32) in a review of 12 sampled residents and one additional sample resident (Resident #23) who had bed rails in place on their beds. The facility census was 40. Review of the facility's Bed Safety Policy, revised December 2007, showed the following: -Our facility shall strive to provide a safe sleeping environment for the resident; -The resident's sleeping environment shall be assessed by the interdisciplinary team, considering the resident's safety, medical conditions, comfort, and freedom of movement, as well as input from the resident and family regarding previous sleeping habits and bed environment; -To try to prevent deaths/injuries from the beds and related equipment (including the frame, side rails,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-01-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the recommendations made by the licensed pharmacist during the monthly medication regimen reviews were communicated to the physician, and a response recorded from the physician for four residents (Resident #9, #18, #29, and #39), in a review of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 40. Review of the facility policy on Medication Regimen Reviews (MMR), revised May 2019, showed the following: -The Consultant Pharmacist reviews the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly; -The goal of the MMR is to promote positive outcomes while minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication; -The MMR involves a thorough review of the resident's medical record to prevent, identify, report and resolve medication related problems, medication errors and other irregularities; -Within 24 hours of the MMR, the Consultant Pharmacist provides a written report to the attending physicians for each resident identified as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-01-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR), or document a clinical reason to justify the need to continue psychotropic medication (a medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) for two residents (Resident #18 and #39) in a review of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 40. Review of the facility policy Medication Regimen Reviews, revised May 2019, did not address gradual dose reduction of psychotropic medication. 1. Review of Resident #18's face sheet showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's Physician's Orders, dated 11/6/2019, directed the staff to administer Duloxetine (a medication for depression) 30 milligrams (mg) daily. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Moderate cognitive issues; -No signs or symptoms of depression -Administered antidepressant medication daily. Review of the resident's Pharmacist Recommendations dated 1/14/20,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-01-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure insulin vials were properly labeled for one resident (Resident #241) in a review of 12 sampled residents and one additional resident (Resident #10). In addition the facility failed to properly secure a stock controlled substance, removed expired medication and label an open injectable in the medication room. The facility census was 40. Review of the facility's policy for Insulin Administration from MED-PASS 2001, revised September, 2014 showed if opening a new insulin vial, record expiration date and time on the vial. 1. Observation on 12/29/20 at 6:38 A.M. in the medication cart showed the following: -An open, undated vial of Lantus (long acting) insulin for Resident #10; -An open, undated vial of Lantus insulin for Resident #241. 2. Observation of the facility's only medication storage room on 12/30/20, at 1:05 P.M., showed the following: -One opened bottle of Debrox ear wax removal aid, expiration date of 8/17/20; -Three bottles of normal saline, unopened, with expiration date of 10/30/20; -One open, undated vial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-01-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff washed their hands and changed soiled gloves after each direct resident contact and when indicated by professional practices during care for two residents (Resident #17, and 241) in a review of 12 sampled residents, and failed to follow infection control practices while performing catheter care and dressing changes for two residents (Resident #17 and #39). The facility census was 40. Review of the facility policy Standard Precautions dated 2001 and last revised 10/18 showed standard precautions are used in the care of all residents regardless of their diagnoses, or suspected or confirmed infection status. Standard precautions presume that all blood, body fluids, secretions and excretions (except sweat), non-intact skin and mucous membranes may contain transmissible infectious agents. Personnel are trained in the various aspects of Standard Precautions to ensure appropriate decision-making in various clinical situations. Hand Hygiene refers to handwashing with soap (anti-microbial or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-01-05 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — patternRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to complete inspections of bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for five residents (Resident #7, #18, #25, #29 and #32 ) of 12 sampled residents and one additional resident (Resident #23). The facility census was 40. Review of the facility's Bed Safety Policy, revised December 2007, showed the following: -Our facility shall strive to provide a safe sleeping environment for the resident; -The resident's sleeping environment shall be assessed by the interdisciplinary team, considering the resident's safety, medical conditions, comfort, and freedom of movement, as well as input from the resident and family regarding previous sleeping habits and bed environment; -To try to prevent deaths/injuries from the beds and related equipment (including the frame, side rails, headboard, footboard, and bed accessories), the facility shall promote the following approaches:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-09-10 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer/discharge with required information to the resident and/or resident representative for three residents (Residents #5, #6, and #39), in a review of 17 sampled residents, when the facility initiated a transfer to the hospital. The facility also failed to provide a copy of the bed hold notice on transfer/discharge. The facility census was 41.Review of the facility policy, Facility-Initiated Transfer or Discharge, revised October 2022, showed the following:-Facility-initiated transfers and discharges, when necessary, must meet specific criteria and require resident/representative notification and orientation, and documentation as specified in this policy;-The resident and representative are notified in writing of the following information: a. The specific reason for the transfer or discharge; b. The effective date of the transfer or discharge; c. The specific location (such as the name of the new provider or description…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-09-10 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess the resident and correctly code the minimum data set (MDS) assessment for five residents (Residents #11, #14, #36, #6, and #7), in a review of 17 sampled residents, and one additional resident (Resident #47). The facility failed to accurately code a wound that was present on admission for Resident #7, failed to accurately code a Wanderguard alarm for Residents #11 and #14, failed to accurately code hospice for Residents #36 and #47, and failed to code active diagnoses for Resident #6. The facility census was 41.During an interview on 09/10/25 at 7:30 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the facility followed the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual for completion of the MDS. Review of the Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, version 3.0, showed the following:-Document active diagnoses on the MDS as follows: Diagnoses are listed by major disease category: cancer,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident or resident representative a copy of the resident's baseline care plan for three residents Resident (#5, #7, and #14). The facility census was 41. Review of the facility policy, Care Plans - Baseline, revised 2022, showed the following:-A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission;-The resident and/or representative are provided a written summary of the baseline care plan (in a language that the resident/representative can understand) that includes, but is not limited to the following: -The stated goals and objectives of the resident; -A summary of the resident's medications and dietary instructions; -Any services or treatments to be administered by the facility and personnel acting on behalf of the facility, and; -Any updated information based on the details of the comprehensive care plan, as necessary;-Provision of the summary to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-12-13 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post required nurse staffing information, which included the facility name and total actual hours worked by both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care, per shift, on a daily basis. The facility census was 37. The facility did not provide a policy for posted nurse staffing information. 1. Observation on 12/10/23 at 2:10 P.M. of the Daily Staff/Census sheet showed the following: -Date 12/10/23; -Census; -Director of Nursing (DON) scheduled hours; -Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) scheduled hours; -Registered Nurse (RN) scheduled hours; -Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) scheduled hours; -Certified Medication Technician (CMT) scheduled hours; -Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) scheduled hours; -Nurse Aide (NA) scheduled hours; -The form did not include the facility name, census, and total actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. Observation on 12/11/23 at 9:00 A.M. of the Daily Staff/Census sheet showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-15 for 14 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHUYLER COUNTY NURSING HOME DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/29/1976 |
| BUSHNELL, RYAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 12/20/2023 |
| OBERMAN, MIKE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 12/20/2023 |
| MCLAIN, CAROL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2025 |
| MORGAN, TERRY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 12/20/2023 |
| BARNES, ERIC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2019 |
| HUMPHREY, REBECCA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| RUSSELL, DORENE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/18/2015 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265816. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.