Pinnacle Point Wellness & Rehabilitation
4700 NW Cliffview Drive, Riverside, MO 64150 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 180 certified beds · (816) 741-5105 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $52,878 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-20)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (80%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2026-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.6% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.3% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.5% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.7% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.2% | 17.4% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 30.4% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.0% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.3% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.9% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.8% | 23.5% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 11.4% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 5.9% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 14.6% | 26.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.1% | 13.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.28 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.90 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.02 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 7.3–14.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 111.7 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 68 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.10 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.08 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 80% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to evaluate and respond to a change in condition for two residents (Resident #152, and #72) when the facility failed to recognize one resident (Resident #152) was lethargic, difficult to arouse, and had minimal to no oral intake for over 24 hours which resulted in an emergency discharge to the hospital for severe dehydration, urinary tract infection and possible sepsis (a life threatening result of infection that could lead to tissue damage, organ failure and death). The facility staff also failed to identify and respond to one resident (Resident #72) who had a critically high blood glucose reading following blood glucose readings consistently over 200 milimoles per liter (mmol/l : the measurement for molecular blood sugar) since November 1, 2023, resulting in an emergency discharge to the hospital for hyperglycemia (high blood glucose: happens when the body has too little insulin. Hyperglycemia can lead to diabetic ketoacidosis, a serious…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of Resident #1 was met when the facility provided the resident transportation to the bank and left him/her, returned but did not locate the resident and left without the resident. The resident did not receive his medications as ordered and slept outside in an alley. The resident borrowed a phone and called the facility to come pick him/her up the next morning. This affected one of seven sampled residents. The facility census was 114.On 06/29/26, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which began on 06/17/26. Upon discovery, the facility administration immediately conducted an investigation, and corrective actions were implemented to include staff training regarding resident transportation. The noncompliance was corrected on 06/18/26. Review of the In-Service Training Report dated, 06/18/2026 included:Subject: Resident TransportationSummary of Meeting: 1.) If we transfer a resident, we are liable;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0555 — patternHonor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to allow three residents (Resident #1, #2 and #3) to exercise their right to choose a physician, when the facility limited the choice of physicians to only those who were chosen by the facility, without allowing Residents #1, #2 and #3, to select their own physician. The facility census was 109. Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, dated August 2020 showed:-All residents have a right to a dignified existence, self determination and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility; -The facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhanced enhancement of his or her quality of life recognizing each resident's individuality;-The facility will protect and promote the rights of the resident and provide equal access to qualify quality of care regardless of diagnosis severity of condition or payment source;-The facility will ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect when staff allowed Resident #64 to scream and yell obscenities in the hall and dining room while Resident #41 sat in the dining room, and when staff failed to acknowledge Residents #22 and #33 when they rang their call light and asked for a snack. This affected three of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 119.Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy dated, January 2023 showed:-Each resident had the right to a dignified existence, in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life;-Each resident had the right to self determination, which the facility must promote and facilitate through the support of resident choice;-The resident had the right to a comfortable and home like environment.1. Review of Resident #41's admission minimum data set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/25/25 showed:-Moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform residents and/or their responsible parties, in advance of the risks and benefits of proposed care, when the facility failed to obtain written consent before beginning psychotropic medications (medications that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) for four residents (Resident #37, #5, #8, and #79) of the 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 119. Review of facility's Resident [NAME] of Rights policy, dated January 2023, showed: The facility residents have the right to be informed in advance of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment alternatives or treatment options, and to choose the treatment option or alternative he or she prefers. 1.Review of Resident #37's care plan, dated 9/3/25, showed the resident used antidepressant medication for the treatment of depression and also used anti-anxiety medication for the treatment of anxiety. Review of the resident's physician order sheet, dated January of 2025 through February of 2025, showed:-The resident's order for Buspirone (anti-anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, when facility staff failed to utilize appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for two Residents (Resident #13 and #112) of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 119. Review of the facility's Management of Communicable Diseases policy, dated, September 2019, showed: -Standard precautions (a set of evidence-based infection control practices designed to prevent the transmission of infections in healthcare settings which includes: hand washing, wearing gloves, gowns, masks, and regularly cleaning equipment) are intended to be applied to the care of all patients in all healthcare setting, regardless of the suspected or confirmed presence of an infectious agent; -The facility will establish guidelines to prevent the transmission of infections, communicable disease, and healthcare acquired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to to reimburse residents and/or their responsible parties within the 30 day time frame, after the residents were discharged from the facility, which affected eleven residents. The facility's census was 112. The facility did not provide a policy regarding conveyance of personal funds. Review of Interim Aged Analysis Summary, dated [DATE], showed: -Resident #215, discharged on [DATE], had a balance of $1,471.48; -Resident #219, discharged on [DATE], had a balance of $.09; -Resident #217, discharged on [DATE], had a balance of $3,296.00; -Resident #218, discharged on [DATE], had a balance of $1437.00; -Resident #220, discharged on [DATE], had a balance of $573.00; -Resident #221, discharged on [DATE], had a balance of $5450.00; -Resident #222, discharged on [DATE], had a balance of $2,351.26; -Resident #223, discharged on [DATE], had a balance of $204.16; -Resident #224, discharged on [DATE], had a balance of $1584.00; -Resident #225, discharged on [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0574 — patternThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received information and contact information for State and local advocacy organizations when the facility staff did not provide information to the residents on how to file a complaint with the State Survey Agency and did not prominently display this information in the facility for residents to view. The facility census was 112. Review of facility policy, Resident [NAME] of Rights, revised [DATE], showed facility residents shall have the right to receive from the facility a written description of legal rights including a list of names, addresses, (mailing and email), and telephone numbers of all pertinent State regulatory and informational agencies such as the State Survey Agency for information for filing grievances and complaints. 1. Review of Resident #80's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by staff, dated 3/11/25, showed the resident is cognitively intact. During an interview on 4/9/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident representative was notified of a change in condition for two of the 23 residents sampled (Residents #102 and #86). The facility census was 112. Review of facility's Notification of Change In a Resident's Status Policy, dated 11/2017, showed: -The attending physician/physician extender and the resident representative will be notified of a change in a resident's condition, per standards of practice and Federal and/or State regulations; -Responsibility: all licensed nursing personnel; -Guideline for notification of physician and responsible party (not all inclusive): a) Onset of pressure sores; b) Any accident or incident; -Documentation of notification of responsible party in the Interdisciplinary Team Notes. 1. Review of Resident #86's Quarterly MDS (minimum data set), a federally mandated clinical assessment, completed by facility staff), dated 12/20/2024, showed: -Cognition not intact. -Dependent on staff for all ADLs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment and comfortable sound levels. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure resident wheelchairs were clean and maintained in good repair. This affected six sampled residents (Resident #26, #29, #48, #83, #21, and #315) out of 23 sampled residents. The facility census was 112. Review of the facility policy, Resident Rights, dated 1/2023, showed residents have the right to a clean and homelike environment. The facility did not provide a policy on maintaining resident medical equipment. Review of the facility policy, Resident Room Cleaning, dated 6/2018, showed: -Spot clean walls; - Remove trash. 1. Review of Resident #29's Quarterly minimum data set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 1/11/25, showed: -Cognition severely impaired; -He/She was dependent on a wheelchair; -Diagnoses included: dementia and Alzheimer's disease Observation on 4/7/25 at 8:02 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff failed to provide complete perineal care for Resident #165 after an incontinence episode. In addition, the facility failed ensure call lights were answered timely for four residents (Resident #3, #10, #34, and #35). This affected five of 23 sampled residents The facility census was 112. Review of the facility policy, Resident [NAME] of Rights, dated 1/2023, showed: -Receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences; -Self-determination, which the facility must provide and facilitate through support of resident choice, assessments, and plan of care and make other choices about aspects of his or her life that are significant to the resident, including: activities, health care schedules (including sleeping, waking, bathing, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided care in a manner to prevent infection or the possibility of infection when staff failed to clean and disinfect a resident's mattress and seated rolling walker after being soiled with urine and feces, which affected one of the 23 sampled residents, (Resident #165), failed to use and failed to use personal protective equipment (PPE, equipment worn to minimize exposure to a variety of hazards, examples included gloves, gowns and masks) for residents who were on Isolation for Contact requirements or Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, infection control measures that go beyond standard precautions and focus on reducing the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), for Resident #1 and #103. The facility census was 112. Review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 4/24 showed: - Enhanced Barrier Precautions are indicated for residents with infections or colonization with a Centers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents in a manner to maintain their dignity when staff failed to knock on a resident's door and wait for a response before entering which affected four of 23 sampled residents, (Resident #1, #30, #104, and #165) and additionally when staff opened Resident #1's door exposing the resident's bare skin from the waist down, in view of the hallway. The facility also failed to shower one resident (Resident #32) per his/her preference. The facility census was 112. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident [NAME] of Rights, revised 1/23, showed: - Each resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life, regardless of diagnosis, severity of condition or payment source and to exercise those rights as a citizen of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate and timely update of assessments when one resident's (Resident #48) change in functional abilities and use of a wheelchair, was not updated with a significant change and when one resident (Resident #86) had a change in cognitive status from cognition intact to cognition severely impaired on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) ( a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff). This occurred for two of twenty-three sampled residents (Resident #48 and #86). The facility census was 112. The facility did not provide a policy regarding updating the MDS when residents have a change of condition. 1. Review of Resident #48's, Significant change MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -Cognition severely impaired. -Hospice care added, which was not on prior MDS; -He/She was dependent on a walker; -He/She required set up or clean up assistance with eating only; -He/She required partial to moderate assistance with toileting, bathing, dressing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff developed and updated a care plan consistent with resident's specific conditions and needs (Resident #74), resident's shaving preferences (Resident #25), and resident's change in mobility status and need for feeding assistance (Resident #48) which affected three (Resident #74, #25, and #48) of 23 sampled residents. The facility census was 112. Review of facility policy, comprehensive person-centered care plans, dated 1/2025, showed: -Each resident would have a person-centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, strengths, preferences, and goals that would identify how the interdisciplinary team would provide care. -Care plan could be revised at quarterly intervals in conjunction with the completion of MDS quarterly, significant change, and annual assessments per the RAI manual; -The Interdisciplinary team along with resident and or resident's representative will identify resident problems, needs, strengths, life…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents remained free from accident hazards when staff pushed residents in their wheelchairs without foot pedals in place for three residents (Resident #29, #83, and #79) of the 23 samples residents. The facility census was 112. Review of the facility policy, Resident [NAME] of Rights, dated January 2023, showed the facility shall provide a safe environment. Facility did not provide a policy on regarding accident prevention. Review of facility policy, Accident and incident documentation and investigation, dated July 2018, showed: -Accidents and/or incidents involving resident care will be investigated and documented on there resident incident report entry form in the long term care system. An incident is defined as an occurrence which is not consistent with routine operation of the facility or the routine care of a particular resident. Accidents and incidents will be analyzed for trends or patterns to enable the facility to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with an error rate of less than five percent (5%). Staff made two errors out of 25 opportunities for error, which resulted in an error rate of 8%. This affected one of the 23 sampled residents, (Resident #72). The facility census was 112. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication administration-general guidelines, revised 8/16, showed: - Medications are administered as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so; - Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have familiarized themselves with the medication; - Prior to administration, the medication and dosage schedule on the resident's medication administration record (MAR)/eMAR (electronic MAR) is compared with the medication label; - Information on the medication should be checked against the MAR/eMAR or treatment administration record (TAR)/electronic TAR (eTAR) at least three times during the med preparation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store medications in a locked storage area to ensure medications were inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents, when eye drops (Resident #26) and one blue pill (Resident #27) were left at bedside. This affected two out of 23 sampled residents. The facility census was 112. Review of facility policy, Medication Administration General Guidelines, revised August 2016, showed: - Residents are allowed to self-administer medications when specifically authorized by the attending physician and the interdisciplinary team and in accordance with procedures for self-administration of medications; - In the event a non-controlled medication is refused by the resident, the nurse is to waste the medication by placing it in the sharps container or a clearly labeled container or cabinet in a locked secured area designated for that purpose until destroyed; Review of facility policy, Medication Administration General Guidelines, revised August 2016,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide acceptable accommodations for one non English speaking resident (Resident #104) and failed to provide one resident appropriate seating for meal times when his/her chair put his/her at face at table height (Resident # 26). This affected two of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 103. Facility did not provide a policy on accommodation of needs. Review of Resident [NAME] of Rights, revised 1/23, showed: -Each resident had a right to dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services and outside the facility in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of (his or her) quality of life, regardless of diagnosis, severity of condition. -Informed in a language he/she can understand of his/her total health status, including but not limited to, his/her medical condition. -Reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of residents needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-15 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form CMS - 10123, to Medicare beneficiaries at least two days before the end of a Medicare covered Part A stay. This affected two out of 21 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #93). The facility census was 103. The facility did not provide the requested policy for Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form CMS - 10123. CMS Guidlines: Form CMS-10123, is given by the facility to all Medicare beneficiaries at least two days before the end of a Medicare covered Part A stay or when all of Part B therapies are ending. The NOMNC informs the beneficiaries of the right to an expedited review by a Quality Improvement Organization. 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record showed: -The resident had a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) issued that showed Medicare Part A benefits were ending on 8/20/24; -The NOMNC was signed by the resident on 8/20/24; -The resident's record showed the facilty failed to ensure the resident received the NOMNC at least at least two days before the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Review of Resident #77's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), completed by facility staff and dated 8/9/24, showed: - Cognitive skills intact; - Independent with transfers; - Diagnoses included anxiety and depression. Review of the resident care plan, dated 4/4/2022, showed: - The resident had an alteration in sleep pattern related to insomnia ( persistent problems falling and staying asleep); administer medications as ordered by the physician; observe for changes in sleep pattern inability to fall/stay asleep; provide a quiet restful environment. During an interview on 10/7/24 at 3:17 P.M., the resident said; - The staff take the smoking cart outside and roll it past his/her door and it is very loud; - There is something broken on it and it makes a loud clunking sound; - The smoking cart has been broken for over a month; - He/she has trouble sleeping at night and it has woken him/her up before. Observation on 10/8/24 at 7:14 A.M., showed: - Staff pushing the smoking cart down the hallway to the exit for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-15 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints when the facility failed to obtain a physician's order, assess, monitor or care plan the use of a seat belt (a belt or strap used to secure a person to prevent injury) for one resident (Resident #11) and when the facility staff failed to unlock the wheels of a wheelchair for one resident (Resident #84) after the resident was observed pushing against the table with his/her hands, pushing back into the back of the wheelchair and yelling out repeatedly, He/She didn't want it. The facility census was 103. Review of the facility's Restraint Evaluation and Reduction policy, dated December 2023, showed in part: -All residents have the right to be free from restraints; -Physical restraints are identified as any manual method or physical devise attached to the resident's body that they cannot remove easily and restricts freedom of movement; -The following devices are considered a restraint and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to check the Family Care Safety Registry (FCSR, a registry that provides background information on people who work with children, seniors, and people with disabilities in Missouri) for three of the 10 sampled employees prior to them having contact with any resident. The facility census was 103. Review of the facilty's Abuse Prevention Policy, dated October 2022, showed in part: -The facilty is committed to protecting the residents from abuse; -The facilty conducts employee back ground checks; -The facilty will pre -screen all potential employees for a history of abusive behavior. 1. Review of Dietary Aide E's personnel file showed: -Date of hire 9/17/24; -A check of the FCSR dated 10/9/24; -The facilty failed to check the FCSR before the employee had contact with the residents. 2. Review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) H's personnel file showed: -Date of hire 5/8/24; -A check of the FCSR dated 5/20/24; -The facilty failed to check the FCSR before the employee had contact with the residents. 3. Review of Certified Nurses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-15 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assure resident Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated Assessment tool completed by facility staff) assessments were completed accurately and timely for four of 21 sampled residents (Residents #72, #33, #84 and #39). The census was 103. Review of the facility provided policy, MDS Assessments dated 6/2023 showed: -The facility shall conduct interdisciplinary assessments using the MDS item sets. These assessments provide information on the resident's condition to facilitate development of an individualized plan of care as a means by which the facility can track changes in a resident's status. -Non-Medicare covered residents will be completed upon admission, discharge, quarterly and annually per Federal/State requirements. -Death in facility and entry tracking records will be completed per the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) instructions. 1. Review of Resident #72 Electronic Health Record showed: -admission date of 2/3/24;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for four of 21 sampled residents (Residents #39, #113, #26, #84) by not addressing care areas of resident side rail usage (Resident #39 and #113), use of a bilevel positive airway pressure device (bipap) (a noninvasive ventilator that helps people breathe by delivering pressurized air into airways) (Resident #39), and significant weight loss (Resident #26 and #84). The facility census was 103. Review of facility policy, comprehensive person centered care plans, revised March 2018, showed: -Each resident will have a person centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, strengths, preferences, and goals that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care; -The interdisciplinary team along with the resident and/or resident representative will identify resident problems, needs, strengths, life history, preferences, and goals; -For each problem, need, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL's) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff failed to ensure they provided perineal care at least every two hours. This affected two of the 21 sampled residents, (Resident #11 and #19). The facility census was 103. Review of the Missouri Resident [NAME] of Rights, provided through the state long term are ombudsman (a person who represents the interests of residents) program included Residents have the right to privacy, to be treated with consideration, respect, and dignity, recognizing each resident' s individuality. Review of the facility's Incontinent Care Policy, review date January 2015, showed -Provide routine, preventative skin, perineal care after each incontinent episode. 1. Review of Resident #11's, Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to treat significant weight loss for two residents (Resident #26 and #84) and failed to provide adequate hydration for 6 residents (Resident #26, #84, #35, #57, #94 and #4) of the 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 103. Review of the facility provided policy Hydration Cart dated 2016 showed: -Water or other fluids shall be offered to all residents throughout the day. Fluids are typically offered during meals, snacks. A hydration cart or location may be used to enhance access and encouragement of fluids for residents. -The Hydration Cart will be offered or refreshed each day at mid morning, mid afternoon and bedtime. -The cart or location will include fresh ice water and another beverage such as iced tea or lemonade. And may include snacks. -The cart or location will include fluids appropriate for those on thickened liquids. The facility did not provide a policy on weight loss or meal intake. 1. Review of Resident #26's Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-15 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to assess residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation and failed to ensure the bed's dimensions were appropriate for the resident's size and weight, and failed to obtain physician's orders for side rails for four of 21 sampled residents (Resident #39, #113, #54, and #104). The facility census was 103. The facility did not provide a policy on entrapment. 1. Review of Resident #39's quarterly minimum data set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 9/13/24, showed: -He/She was cognitively intact; -He/She had clear speech, was able to make self-understood and understand others; -He/She was dependent on his/her wheelchair for mobility; -He/She required partial/moderate assistance from staff with dressing, toileting, bathing, and mobility from sitting to lying; -Diagnoses included respiratory failure (condition when lungs can not get enough oxygen into blood or remove enough…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with a medication error rate of less than 5%. Facility staff made five medication errors out of 26 opportunities for error, resulting in a medication error rate of 20%. This affected five of the 21 sampled residents, (Resident #4, #15, #43, #91 and #103). The facility census was 103. Review of the facility's policy for general guidelines for medication administration, dated 8/16, showed, in part: - Medications are administered as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only be persons legally authorized to do so. Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have familiarized themselves with the medication; - Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of attending physicians, taking into consideration manufacturer's specifications and professional standards of practice; - Medications are administered within the identified block of time per facility defined parameters. One hour before and one hour…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and attractive when hall trays were not served per resident food preferences and was not attractive. The deficient practice affected two of 21 sampled residents (Resident #85 and #52 ). The facility census was 103. The facility did not provide a policy for resident food preferences. 1. Review of Resident #85's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -He/She had severe cognitive impairment; -He/She required set up or clean up assistance with eating; -Diagnoses included: cancerous tumor, dementia, and anxiety. Review of care plan, undated, showed: -He/She was able to feed self but had dementia that may affect food intake and his/her weight; -Obtain/update food preferences; -Serve diet as ordered. Review of physician's orders, dated October 2024, showed: -Ordered 6/10/24, He/She was on a regular diet. During an observation on 10/9/24 at 1:10 P.M., showed: -Resident's rice was in form of ice cream scoop; -Resident observed having…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the walls, ceilings, and floors, of the facility were maintained in good repair. This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 103. The facility did not provide a policy on upkeep and repair. 1. Observations beginning on 10/08/24 at 7:58 A.M. on the Special Care Unit (SCU) showed: -Hallway light fixtures had dead bugs, dust and debris; -Hallway hand rails were scratched and had scuff marks; -The Utility room door had large scratches and chipped paint; -room [ROOM NUMBER] entry door was scratched with large areas of chipped paint and drug against the floor when opening/closing; -room [ROOM NUMBER] entry door had chipped paint that exposed the wood underneath; -room [ROOM NUMBER] entry door was scratched with chipped paint; -room [ROOM NUMBER] entry door had multiple paint chips that exposed the wood underneath; -The Dining/Activity room baseboard had thick black/gray, crusty debris at edge of baseboard and floor;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-15 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to prevent gnats, flies and wasps in resident rooms, dining rooms, and hallways. The facility census was 103. The facility did not provide a pest control policy. 1. Observation on 10/07/24 at 9:18 AM showed multiple gnats in room [ROOM NUMBER]. 2. Observation on 10/07/24 at 11:05 A.M. showed multiple flies in the dining room. 3. Observation on 10/07/24 11:21 AM showed room [ROOM NUMBER]: -A fly strip hanging from the room divider with multiple dead flies on it; -Multiple flies and gnats in the room. 4. Observation on 10/07/24 at 11:30 AM Resident #18 said -There were flies in his/her room a lot; -There were multiple flies in room, landing on resident and crawling on the bed. 5. Observation on 10/08/24 at 7:58 A.M. on the Special Care Unit showed: -Two large wasps on the nursery room wall; -room [ROOM NUMBER] had multiple flies in the room, crawling on the resident, the bed and flying throughout…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were cared for in a dignified way when staff tugged on a residents shirt, ignoring the residents repeated requests for them to stop. Furthermore, staff treated the resident disrespectfully by yelling at the resident when the resident attempted to self propel his/her wheelchair up and down the halls of a secured care unit. This affected one of 21 sampled residents (Resident #85). The facility census was 103 Review of the facility provided Resident [NAME] of Rights dated 01/2023 showed: -Each resident has a right to a dignified existence, in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life -The right to self determination, which the facility must promote and facilitate through support of resident choices about aspects of of his/her life in the facility. Including but not limited to activities, health care schedules and how he/she spends time. -The right to be free of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation Review of Resident #85's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to assist one resident of the 21 sampled residents (Resident #82) with help in obtaining a hearing aide. The facility census was 103. Review of the facility's job description for the director of social services, dated 8/1/2012, showed, in part: - Under the direction of the Executive Director, the Social Services Director is responsible for monitoring the residents' mental and psycho-social needs and to provide the services to meet these needs in order to attain or maintain the highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psycho-social well-being; - Utilizes the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process in conducting a psycho-social assessment; - Formulates a care plan which addresses the identified problems, needs, and concerns; - Documents progress toward goals, assessment updates, and interventions; - Reviews the resident's progress toward resolution of problems, needs, or concerns,; evaluates the effectiveness of the staff approaches, evaluates changes in the mental and psycho-social assessment; - Participates in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a safe and effective medication administration system that was free of significant medication errors when staff failed to provide a meal to a resident within 15 minutes after receiving fast acting insulin. This affected one out of 21 sampled residents, (Resident #103). The facility census was 103. Review of the facility's policy for general guidelines for medication administration, dated 8/16, showed, in part: - Medications are administered as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only be persons legally authorized to do so. Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have familiarized themselves with the medication; - Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of attending physicians, taking into consideration manufacturer's specifications and professional standards of practice; - Medications are administered within the identified block of time per facility defined parameters. One hour before and one hour…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure prescribed medications were administered at the prescribed time and were available for administration for eight of 13 residents (Resident (R)95, R62, R24, R41, R54, R263, R17, and R48) in the medication administration observation. These failures caused 29 medication errors out of 59 opportunities for error, or a medication error rate of 49.15%. The facility census was 115. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Medication Administration-General Guidelines dated 08/16, revealed . Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of attending physicians . All current medications and dosage schedules are listed on the resident's medication administration record .and administered timely according to facility policy . Medications are administered within the identified block of time per facility defined parameters. One hour before and one hour after the scheduled time, except for orders relating to before,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-29 · tag F0839 — widespreadEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a qualified administrator on duty from 2/15/2024 to 3/3/2024. The facility census was 106. During an interview on 2/14/24 at approximately 4:00 P. M., Administrator B notified the state survey agency that he/she was no longer the Administrator of record at the facility. Review of the current Missouri Board of Nursing Home Administrators (MBNHA) license registry website showed Administrator A not listed as a current Missouri Licensed Administrator. During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 11:50 A.M., Administrator A said: -He/She had completed the Administrator in Training program, but has not taken the test to obtain an administrator license. -He/She thought the State regulations state the new administrator had 120 days to obtain an administrator license. -He/She was unsure if anyone at the corporate level was a licensed administrator in Missouri and would act as a licensed administrator until he/she obtained a license. During an interview on 2/28/2024 at 9:53 A.M., Corporate [NAME] President A said: -Administrator A's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, see the Statement of Deficiencies dated 11/20/23. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four (Resident #21, #57, #80, #7) of six sampled residents who required staff assistance received the necessary assistance with bathing. The facility census was 109. Review of facility policy, Bath/Shower-Dependent, dated 9/03, showed a bath for cleanliness and comfort is scheduled at least weekly for each resident. 1. Review of Resident #21's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 10/5/23, showed: - A Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) an assessment used in long term care facilities to monitor cognition) of 15, which indicated he/she had intact cognition; - He/She was dependent of staff help for toileting hygiene, bathing, upper body dressing, lower body dressing, putting on footwear, rolling left to right, sitting to lying, lying to sitting, and all transfers; -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the call light system was accessible and functioned properly for two of 22 sampled residents who required staff assistance (Resident #19 and #57). The facility census was 106. The facility did not provide a policy regarding call lights. 1. Review of Resident #57's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 8/31/23, showed: - No Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS); - No recorded resident preferences; - Substantial/Maximal assistance for toileting hygiene, showering upper and lower body dressing, rolling left and right, and sitting to lying; - The resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder; - Diagnoses of Hypertension (HTN), heart failure, diabetes, severe obesity, and a burn of second degree to the abdominal wall. Review of the resident's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 11/8/23, showed: - He/She was at risk for skin break down related to needing assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$52,878 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $52,878 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-04 for 13 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-02 for 62 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265379. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.