Laurel Meadows Wellness & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 119 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 103 beds and averages 81.1 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.31 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.554 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.85 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.56 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2022-10-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to immediately consult the physician for one (Resident #58) of three sampled residents reviewed for diabetic management, when the resident was admitted to the facility on high-dose insulin and other diabetic medications, but had no orders for blood glucose (blood sugar) monitoring. Additionally, the facility failed to consult with the physician when Resident #58's insulin was withheld due to hypoglycemic (low blood sugar) episodes. The failed practices resulted in Resident #58 requiring emergency care, administration of intravenous (IV) glucose, and subsequent hospitalization to correct a critically low blood sugar. It was determined the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation caused, or was likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, §483.10(g)(14) Notification of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2022-10-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure diabetes management was provided in accordance with accepted standards of nursing practice for one (Resident #58) of three sampled residents reviewed for diabetic management. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure when Resident #58 was admitted to the facility with orders for high-dose insulin and oral diabetes medications, that licensed nursing staff identified and addressed a lack of orders for blood glucose (blood sugar) testing and initiated monitoring for signs/symptoms of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) and hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). Additionally, licensed nursing staff withheld Resident #58's physician-ordered insulin without discussing that decision with the resident's physician. The failure to regularly check blood glucose levels and monitor for signs/symptoms of hypoglycemia resulted in Resident #58 requiring emergency care for a critically low blood glucose level, administration of intravenous (IV) glucose, and hospitalization. It was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of video from the resident's room and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a dignified and respectful manner for one resident (Resident #4), in a review of eight sampled residents. The resident presented with ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, a progressive neurological disorder that leads to muscle weakness, atrophy, and eventually paralysis. ALS does not typically affect cognitive functions like thinking, memory, or sensory perception). The resident was dependent on staff for cares and had difficulty communicating both verbally and in writing. The resident wanted a drink and Certified Nurse Aide A interaction with the resident was impatient and dismissive when the resident attempted to communicate his/her preferences. The resident became upset causing further difficulty for the resident in his/her attempts to communicate. The resident felt the aide was disrespectful and should not work with vulnerable residents. The facility census was 85. On 6/4/25 the administrator was notified of the past non-compliance that occurred on 5/28/25.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a dignified and respectful manner for two dependent residents (Resident #4 and #5), in a review of six residents. Residents reported Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) C was rough while providing care. The facility census was 86. Review of the facility policy Right to Dignity, Respect and Freedom, revised 10/25/23, showed the following: -Residents will be treated with consideration, respect and dignity; -Residents have a right to self-determination. 1. Review of Resident #5's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/15/24, showed the following: -The resident had severely impaired cognition; -He/She was dependent on staff for toileting, hygiene, and transfers; -He/She was always incontinent of bladder and bowel. Review of the resident's Care Plan, dated 9/15/24, showed the following: -Be patient and positive with the resident; -The resident needed assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs); -Be calm and gentle, do not rush or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain the temperature at a safe and comfortable level for the residents who resided on the third floor, when the blower units for the air conditioner were no longer functioning. The facility did not monitor the air temperatures while waiting for the units to be replaced and did not move residents to an area of the facility that maintained acceptable temperatures. This affected rooms 321 through 331 on the third floor. The facility census was 80. Review of the facility policy for Extreme Temperatures dated [DATE] showed the following: -In the event of a power loss, this facility's central air conditioning and heating systems will not function as they are not on the generator. The follow guidelines should be followed to ensure resident safety during times of heat or air conditioning loss; -Air conditioning Loss: In the event that there is a loss of function in the cooling system during hot weather, the following procedures are to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-06-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve the proper size entree to residents on a regular diet and mechanical soft diets, and failed to served pureed food items according to the spreadsheet menu to all residents on a pureed diet. The facility census was 73. Review of the undated facility policy, Portion Control, showed the following: -Individuals will receive the appropriate portions of food as defined by the state regulations and as planned on the menu. Control at the point of service is necessary to assure that the appropriate portion is served; -Use standardized recipes to avoid waste caused by overproduction. Recipes should be adjusted as needed and the yield and serving size specified on each recipe. The menu should list the specific portion size for each food item. Menus should be posted at the tray line so that the proper portion can be referenced for each special diet; -Serve the food with ladles, scoops, spoodles and spoons of standard sizes which match the menus. Scales should be used as needed to weigh meat portions. Scoops should be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the ice machine to be free of an accumulation of debris, failed to ensure food and beverage items were labeled, dated, properly stored and discarded when expired, failed to ensure open cans of foods were properly maintained during food preparation; failed to ensure a scoops was not stored inside a bulk food container, and failed to ensure staff used safe food handling techniques during meal service in the dining room. The facility census was 73. 1. Review of the undated facility policy, Cleaning Instructions: Ice Machine and Equipment, showed the ice machine and equipment (scoops) will be cleaned on a regular basis to maintain a clean, sanitary condition. Observation on 6/3/24 at 12:20 P.M. and on 6/4/24 at 9:11 A.M. showed the ice machine in the main kitchen had a buildup of pink and black debris on the white plastic interior portion of the unit. A small amount of white crusty debris was in the corners near the hinges. During interview on 6/4/24 at 2:24 P.M., the Dietary Director said an outside…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for four residents (Resident #3, #5, #2, and #1), in a review of six residents who had indwelling medical devices or open wounds. Staff failed to utilize Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing high-contact care activities or wound care. The facility had six residents with indwelling urinary catheters (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain the bladder of urine), one resident with a wound vac (wound management system for open draining wounds), and one resident with a tube feeding (a tube inserted into the stomach to provide nutrition, water and medications). The facility census was 89. Review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent the Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs, organisms resistant to antibiotic treatment), dated 7/12/22, showed the following: -Summary of recent changes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide updated pneumococcal vaccine (a vaccine that can protect against pneumococcal disease) education as indicated by the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and failed to provide the option to receive the updated vaccination for four residents (Resident #318, #271, #54, and #275), who were admitted after new guidance was released, in a review of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 73. Review of the facility policy Pneumococcal Policy dated 7/2016 showed: -All residents will be offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections; -Prior to or upon admission, residents will be assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, will be offered the vaccine series within thirty (30) days of admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated or the resident has already been vaccinated; -Assessments of pneumococcal vaccination status…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete inspections of bed frames, mattresses, bed rails/ assist bars as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for four residents, (Resident #1, #24, #32, and #271) in a review of 18 sampled residents who used bed rails. The facility census was 73. Review of the facility's Side Rail Assessment and Consent Policy, dated (last reviewed/revised) 11/16/2023, showed the following: -It is the policy of this facility to provide resident centered care that meets the psychosocial, physical, and emotional needs and concerns of the residents. The safety of the residents, staff, and visitors are a primary concern. The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin as required to the state survey agency for one resident (Resident #51), in a review of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 73. Review of the facility policy, Abuse Prevention, date (last revised 09/10/23), showed the following: -The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not limited to facility staff, other residents, and staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitors, or any other individual; -Identification: -Identify events, such as suspicious bruising of residents, occurrences, patterns, and trends that may constitute abuse; and to determine the direction of the investigation; -The administrator and director of nurses (DON) must be promptly notified of suspected abuse or incidents of abuse. If such incidents occur or are discovered after hours, the administrator and DON must be called at home or must be paged and informed of such incident;…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate bruising of unknown origin that occurred for one resident (Resident #51), in a review of 18 sampled residents, to identify cause. The facility census was 73. Review of the facility policy, Abuse Prevention, date (last revised 09/10/23), showed the following: -The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not limited to facility staff, other residents, and staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitors, or any other individual; -Identify events, such as suspicious bruising of residents, occurrences, patterns, and trends that may constitute abuse; and to determine the direction of the investigation; -The administrator and director of nurses (DON) must be promptly notified of suspected abuse or incidents of abuse. If such incidents occur or are discovered after hours, the administrator and DON must be called at home or must be paged and informed of such incident; -The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$11,536 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

• $2,797 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
• $2,447 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
• $2,098 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
• $4,194 — penalty dated 2023-10-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $837K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO