No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Barnes-Jewish Extended Care

401 Corporate Park Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63105 · Non profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (314) 725-7447 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (314) 725-7447 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
231 S Bemiston Ave Ste 800 · (314) 236-4914 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
300 Hunter Ave Ste 200B · (855) 700-7055 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
222 S Central Ave
Park
231 S Brentwood Blvd · (314) 290-8590 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine48.4%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.8%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.7%13.7%12.0%typical

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 468 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.55U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.28hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 231 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.9%CMS range 56.1–66.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 8.8–13.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 4.8–9.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.90
RN hours/ resident / day
2.32
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.87
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.09
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.58
RN hoursweekends
54.5%
Total nursing turnover
58.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 74.6 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.48 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.03 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-06)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy regarding visitation and failed to ensure residents could receive visitors when the facility locked the front door entrance at 8:30 P.M. and did not allow resident families/visitors to freely enter and exit the facility. The census was 69.Review of the facility's Resident Right to Access and Visitation policy, reviewed 9/22, showed:-Purpose: To outline resident's rights regarding visitation practices within the communities to see that proper compliance with CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) guidelines exists;-Responsibility: It is the responsibility of the Administrator to see that all staff members follow the visitation guidelines within this policy;-Policy: It is the policy of this organization to support and facilitate the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing at the time of his or her choosing, subject to the resident's right to deny visitation when applicable and in a manner that does not impose on the rights of another resident;-The community must…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of one resident (Resident #30) by failing to ensure the resident's call light was plugged in and accessible to the resident. The sample was 18. The census was 69. Review of the facility's Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response policy, revised 8/2024, showed:-Purpose: To establish a procedure to which the community adequately equips call lights at each residents' bedside, toilet and bathing areas to allow residents to call for assistance. Call lights will directly relay to a staff member or centralized location to ensure appropriate response;-Policy: Each resident shall have access to summon assistance lights are answered timely;-Practice: Special accommodations will be identified on the resident's person-centered plan of care and provided accordingly. With each interaction in the resident's room or bathroom, staff will ensure the call light is within reach of resident and secured, as needed. Review of the facility's Nursing Policy - A.M. and P.M. Care, revised 10/2022, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards when staff failed to identify one resident's burn on admission which resulted in the treatment orders not being obtained for four days (Resident #101) and staff failed to identify/document one resident's wound on admission (Resident #53). The sample was 18. The census was 69. Review of the facility's admission of a Resident policy, date revised 2/26, showed:-The nurse should interview and assess the resident upon admission to determine high risk areas based on the resident's admission diagnosis. Assessment findings will be used to provide appropriate equipment or monitoring required. Nursing assessments include but are not limited to skin condition;-When assessing a resident and obtaining orders for a new admit the nurse should refer to the admission checklist and consider the following: skin and wound prevention protocol;-Review and discuss with resident/resident representative current medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards when the facility staff failed to complete/document neurological checks (neuro-checks, an assessment completed by nursing staff to monitor for changes in the resident's neurological (nervous system) status) post fall per the facility's policy for four out of six residents sampled for falls (Residents #14, # 16, #10 and #15). In addition, staff failed to follow a physician order to monitor one resident's blood pressure (B/P) and notify the physician per the physician's order (Resident #14). The sample size was 16. The census was 63.Review of the facility's Fall Management/Reduction Program policy, last revised 9/24, showed:-It is the responsibility of all staff to know and follow this policy;-Once a fall occurs, it is important that an assessment and investigation occur to determine possible cause of the fall utilizing the designated form within the resident's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident with a pressure wound/injury (skin or soft tissue injury that develops with prolonged periods of pressure over specific areas of the body) had necessary treatments and services to promote healing (Resident #30). The sample size was 18. The census was 69.Review of the facility's Wounds: Treatment of Pressure and Non-Pressure policy, revised 6/25/25, showed:-Purpose: To provide guidelines for use in wound assessment, treatment, and documentation;-Policy: The facility's Wound Product Selection Guide will be used as guidelines to determine appropriate treatments. A physician's order is required for all wound treatment; -Interventions should be taken to reduce edema and pressure related to the wound such as offloading heels (critical practice of removing or redistributing pressure from a wound site) and repositioning;-All dressings will be dated and initialed by the nurse applying the dressing. Review of Resident #30's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to evaluate and address the hydration needs for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident #30). The census was 69.Review of the facility's Nursing Policy-A.M. and P.M. Care, revised 10/22, showed the procedure during A.M. and P.M care to be sure water is within reach. Offer and encourage fluid intake with care. Review of Resident #30's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/2/26, showed:-Cognitively intact-Diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia (serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves), anxiety disorder, and benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate gland);-Independent of eating. Review of most current care plan, showed:-Focus: Resident is at risk for weight loss;-Goal: Minimize the risk factors that could contribute to weight loss;-Interventions included: Allow adequate time to eat, assist with positioning during meals, house supplements and snacks, and report to nurse if meal intake decreases.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents were free from significant medication errors when staff failed to administer medications per physician orders and failed to notify the physician when the medications were not administered (Resident #10 and #30). The sample was 18. The census was 69.Review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy, dated revised on 6/23, showed: -Only a licensed nurse or Certified Medication Technician (CMT) may prepare, administer and/or record the administration of medications. Medications must be administered in accordance with a physician's orders (i.e., the right resident, the right medication, the right dosage, the right route and the right time). Medications must always be prepared, administered and recorded by the same nurse/CMT;-Each resident will have his/her own supply of medications, excluding stock medications;-Initial on Medication Administration Record (MAR) after each dose is administered;-Reorder (medication) when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with acceptable standards of practice. The facility identified two medication rooms, six medication carts, and six treatment carts. Both medication rooms, five medication carts and one treatment cart were checked for medication storage. Issues were found in one medication room and two medication carts. Staff failed to double-lock the emergency kit for controlled substances. In addition, staff failed to dispose of expired over-the-counter (OTC) medications. The census was 69.Review of the facility's Delivery, Receipt, Storage, and Inventory of Facility Products policy, reviewed 8/2022, showed:-Subject and Addendum: Storage and expiration date of medications, biologicals, syringes and needles;-The policy failed to provide guidance regarding ensuring medication rooms and medication carts were free from expired medications, or storage of controlled substances under double lock, in accordance with State regulations. 1. Observation on 3/4/26 at 11:33 A.M., showed a controlled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to provide choices for meals and to offer substitutions for two residents (Residents #2 and #128). The sample was 18. The census was 69.Review of the facility's Menu Posting and Menu Substitution policy, dated 1/2025, showed: -Menu Posting:-Menus should include daily choices available for each meal;-An always available or a la carte menu is posted or made available to all residents;-Menu Substitutions:-Menu changes or substitutions for situations such as an emergency event, food unavailability or special dining events will be posted or otherwise communicated prior to meal service;--Menu substitute should be consistent with the usual and/or ordinary food items provided.Review of the facility posted menu, dated 3/2/26 through 3/5/26, showed:-Any additional request for lunch on the same day must be submitted before 10:00 A.M. and dinner request submitted before 2:00 P.M.;-Breakfast entree consisted of scrambled eggs for three out of four…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control standards by not implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)), for one resident who required EBP for Intravenous (IV) medications (Resident #59) and when staff positioned one resident's urinary drainage bag (a medical device designed to collect urine from a catheter (a tube that is inserted into the bladder, allowing your urine to drain freely) on the rim of the trash can (Resident #39). In addition, clean linens were transported in an uncovered cart to the hall linen closets. The sample was 18. The census was 69.Review of the facility's EBP policy, revised on 2/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, for six of twelve residents sampled. Two residents (Residents #5 and #8) did not have orders for wound care, three residents (Residents #6, #7, #9) wound care orders were not followed, and five residents (Residents #4, #6, #7, #8, #9) wound dressings were not dated or initialed per facility policy. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility's policy and procedure for Physician Order, revised 4/2025, showed:-Purpose: To establish guidelines for properly obtaining physician orders and processing these orders;-Policy: Telephone and verbal orders should be documented in the resident's electronic medical record then read back to the ordering physician or independent practitioner for verification;-It is the responsibility of the licensed nurse and Certified Medical Technician (CMT) to understand and comply with this procedure;-It is the responsibility of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appealing meal options of similar nutritive value to residents who choose not to eat food that is initially served or who request a different meal choice, by failing to provide alternate meals per resident preference (Residents #10, #11, and #12). The sample size was 12. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility's menu for the week of 7/7/25 through 7/13/25, showed:-Breakfast for 7/7/25: Oatmeal, scrambled eggs, pancake with maple syrup;-Lunch for 7/7/25: Tomato Florentine soup, maple glazed ham, rice pilaf, green beans, blonde bar;-Breakfast for 7/8/25: Grits, scrambled eggs, bacon strips, biscuit;-Lunch for 7/8/25: Garden vegetable soup, beef sirloin steak, green peas, wheat roll, chocolate pudding;-Breakfast for 7/9/25: Oatmeal, scrambled eggs, orange bread;-Breakfast for 7/10/25: Grits, scrambled eggs, pancake with maple syrup, minestrone;-Breakfast for 7/11/25: Oatmeal, scrambled eggs, biscuit and gravy;-Breakfast for 7/12/25: Grits, scrambled eggs, cinnamon muffin;-Breakfast for 7/13/25:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program when staff failed to wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), in accordance with the facility's policy, during high-contact activities with residents on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, precautions for use during high-contact resident care activities for residents infected with a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO, microorganisms that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents) or any resident who has a chronic wound and/or indwelling medical device) (Residents #295, #301, #6, #200, #249, and #9). The sample was 17. The census was 69. Review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy, revised February 2024, showed: -Purpose: To provide direction for the implementation of precautions to prevent transmission of novel or targeted multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) utilizing guidelines from Centers for Disease Control (CDC);…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's care plan accurately reflected the residents' needs and medical conditions upon admission. This failure was noted in 5 of 17 sampled residents, including Resident #199, whose gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a surgical opening made in the stomach to feed nutrition directly into the stomach) was not included on the care plan, Resident #299 whose continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP, used to treat sleep apnea) was not included on the care plan, Resident #298 whose urinary catheter was not included and Resident #301, whose intravenous (IV) line was not included on the care plan, and for Resident #248 when a foot wound was not included on the care plan. The census was 69. Review of the facility's Care Planning policy, revised 11/22 showed: -It is the responsibility of all members of the interdisciplinary team to know and comply with this policy; -Initial/Baseline care plans must be completed within 48 hours of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Base on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents' Activities of Daily Living (ADL) needs were met by failing to ensure both residents received at least two showers/bed baths weekly (Residents #248 and #249) . The sample was 17. The census was 69. Review of the facility's AM and PM Care policy, revised 10/2022, showed: -Purpose: to provide grooming and hygiene for each resident, assisting with bathing, dressing and elimination as needed; -Policy: it shall be the policy of Bethesda that each resident receives assistance with ADLs as needed throughout each day. Consideration will be given to making the experience as home-like and individual as possible; -Procedure: on the designated day, assist the resident with their bath or shower. 1. Review of Resident #248's electronic medical record (EMR), showed: -admit date [DATE]; -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses included cellulitis, altered mental status, wound on coccyx, wound on right heel, right foot toes are amputated.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one resident (Resident #301). The resident admitted from the hospital on 5/16/24. The facility admission nursing assessment identified an open area on the buttock and a double lumen peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC, a device which delivers fluids directly into a much larger vein) inserted into the right side of the resident's neck. There was no order for the PICC line dressing change, flushing, or care. In addition, facility staff failed to complete treatment orders and apply dressing changes as ordered to the buttocks. The sample was 17. The census was 69. Review of the facility's Central Vascular Access Device (CVAD) Flushing and Locking policy, dated 1/15/2004 and last revision 6/1/21, showed: -Licensed nurses providing infusion therapy in the post-acute setting; -To be performed by licensed nurses according to state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #298) who was admitted with a indwelling urinary catheter (thin tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) had a physicians order to provide care for the catheter. The sample size was 17. The census was 69. Review of the facility's Prescribing and Ordering of Medication/Products policy, dated effective date 4/2002 and last revision 1/24, showed: -To establish guideline for properly obtaining physician orders and processing these orders; -To obtain admission orders from the physician, check the transfer sheet from the discharging facility as a reference; -Enter orders into the resident's medical record. Review of Resident #298's electronic medical record (EMR) and resident information card, reviewed on 5/21/24 at 10:40 A.M., showed: -An entry Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 5/10/24, showed an admission date 5/10/24; -A baseline care plan showed the resident as incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Indwelling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status to the extent possible, for one resident (Resident #34) who experienced a significant weight loss (weight loss of 5% or more in the last month, loss of 7.5% or more in the last three months, or loss of 10% or more in the last six months) of -10.35% from July 2023 to January 2024. During this timeframe, the facility's Registered Dietician (RD) completed two nutritional assessments, noted a decline in the resident's meal intake, and did not recommend additional nutritional interventions. The resident was not served fortified cheesy eggs as recommended by the RD, and the RD's recommendation for fortified pudding did not get added to the resident's meal ticket. Nursing staff failed to consistently chart the resident's meal intake, which is reviewed during the RD's nutrition assessments, and the resident was not served preferred foods at meals. The sample was 17. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were obtained for the use of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP, machine that keeps the airways open during sleep for persons with sleep apnea) for one resident (Resident #299) and to ensure CPAP masks were properly stored while not in use for infection control purposes for two residents (Residents #299 and #146). The sample was 17. The census was 69. Review of the facility's CPAP/Bilateral Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP, mechanical breathing device)/Average Volume Assured Pressure Support (AVAPS, mode of non-invasive ventilation)/Trilogy Ventilator (device used to provide pressure support, pressure control, or volume control during breathing support) policy, revised November 2021, showed: -Purpose: To provide guidelines for staff to assist the resident in using a CPAP/BIPAP/AVAPS/Trilogy Ventilator device; -Responsibility: It will be the responsibility of all licensed nursing staff to know and follow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health services to maintain the highest practicable psychosocial well-being for one resident (Resident #6) who expressed feelings of being better off dead and thoughts of unplugging his/her left ventricular assist device (LVAD, a device implanted in the chest to help the heart pump blood). The sample was 17. The census was 69. Review of Resident #6's medical record, showed: -admission date 5/11/23; -Diagnoses included history of stroke with residual hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), heart disease, heart failure, atrioventricular block (interrupted or delayed heart rate), ischemic cardiomyopathy (heart's decreased ability to pump blood properly), and presence of heart assist device. Review of the resident's physical therapy evaluation, dated 11/9/23, showed: -Discharge environmental factors/social support: Resident has been staying at this facility. Previously, resident lived with family. Resident reported independence with activities of daily living (ADLs); -Prior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store medication and medical equipment in accordance with professional principles, including abiding by the expiration date on stock medications in facility medication rooms and medication carts. Concerns were found in one of two medication rooms and in two of six treatment carts in the facility. The sample size was 17. The census was 69. Review of the facility's LTC Facility's Pharmacy Services and Procedures Manual, revised 12/01/22, showed: -Facility should ensure that medications and biologicals that: (1) have an expired date on the label; (2) have been retained longer than recommended by manufacturer or supplier guidelines; or (3) have been contaminated or deteriorated, are stored separate from other medications until destroyed or returned to pharmacy supplier; -Once any medication or biological package is opened, Facility should follow manufacturer/supplier guidelines with respect to expiration dates for opened medications. Facility staff should record the date opened on the primary medication container…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0554 — pattern
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents could safely administer their own medications for three sampled residents (Residents #374, #376 and #186), who had medications left at their bedside. The census was 60. Review of the facility's Self Administering Medication Policy, reviewed 8/2022, showed: -Medications may be self-administered only after the resident has been evaluated by an interdisciplinary team to determine that the resident can safely self-administer medications with administrator/Executive Director Approval; -An evaluation will be completed and documented prior to allowing self-administration of medications; -If the evaluation indicates the resident may self-administer medications, the resident's/community member's physician must also give an order allowing self-administration. 1. Review of Resident #374's medical record, showed: -Alert and orientated times four (person, place, time and situation); -Required no assistance with eating; -No self-administration assessment completed; -No physician's order to self-administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) receive the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene and grooming by not providing baths or showers at least twice a week, for three sampled residents (Residents #180, #183 and #187). In addition, two sampled residents were observed to have long nails, who preferred to have their nails short and clipped (Residents #7 and #12). The census was 60. Review of the facility's A.M. and P.M. Care Policy, revised on 10/2022, showed: -Purpose: To provide grooming and hygiene for each resident, assisting with bathing, dressing and elimination as needed; -Responsibility: All nursing staff shall be responsible for assisting with ADLs; -Policy: It shall be the policy that each resident receives assistance with ADLs as needed throughout each day; -Procedures included, give nail care as needed. -No specific policy and procedure for baths and showers provided. 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate amounts of all the necessary items were available for the dinner meal on 11/16/22 and for breakfast on 11/17/22 for two residents (Residents #186 and #370). This practice potentially affected all residents who ate food from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 60 residents. Review of the facility's menu for the week of 11/14/22 through 11/20/22, showed: -The dinner menu for 11/16/22: Chicken and dumplings, baby carrots, roll and peaches; -The breakfast menu for 11/17/22: Oatmeal, scrambled eggs, bacon, pancake with maple syrup. 1. Review of Resident #186's medical record, showed the following: -admission: [DATE]; -No cognitive impairment; -Regular diet; -Diagnoses included malnutrition. During observation and interview on 11/17/22 at 8:40 A.M., the resident said he/she ordered chicken and dumplings the previous night, but instead received a grilled cheese sandwich. The resident called the kitchen to find out why…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appealing options of similar nutritive value to residents who choose not to eat food that is initially served or who request a different meal choice, by failing to provide alternate meals (Resident #186). The facility also failed to consistently provide menu tickets for residents to select their meal preferences or serve the items residents selected on their menu ticket (Resident #370). The facility census was 60. 1. Review of the facility's menu for the week of 11/14/22 through 11/20/22, showed: -Breakfast for 11/14/22: Oatmeal, scrambled eggs, pancake with maple syrup; -Breakfast for 11/15/22: Oatmeal, egg scramble, ham, hash brown potatoes; -Breakfast for 11/16/22: Oatmeal, banana, sausage links, chocolate chip muffins; -Breakfast for 11/17/22: Oatmeal, scrambled eggs, bacon, pancake with maple syrup; -Breakfast for 11/18/22: Oatmeal, scrambled eggs, biscuit and gravy; -Breakfast for 11/19/22: Oatmeal, scrambled eggs, sausage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview , facility staff failed to store food in a manner to prevent contamination and out-dated use by not covering and dating food items stored in the refrigerator and storing scoops and cups inside bulk bins. These deficient practices had the potential to effect all residents who at the facility. The census was 60. Review of the facility's Storage of Food and Supplies policy, revised 12/7/20, showed; -All food, non-food items and supplies used in food preparation shall be stored in such a manner as to prevent contamination to maintain the safety and wholesome of the food for human consumption; -Refrigerated Foods: Use food grade plastic bags for food storage. Cover foods stored on ladder/seed racks to prevent contamination from airborne contaminants as well as from dripping condensation. Either use a bag that covers the entire cart or cover each tray individually; -Dry Storage: Opened foods must be stored in approved containers that have tight-fitting lids. Label both the bin and the lid. Hang scoop. Scoops may be stored in bins on a scoop holder. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure staff followed the complaint/grievance policy, when staff failed to make prompt efforts to resolve the resident's grievances affecting one resident (Resident #20). The facility also failed to follow the grievance policy by not providing a written method for the residents to file grievances. The facility census was 60. Review of the resident and family concern policy, revised 2/2019, showed: -Purpose: To establish written guidelines for the filing of resident concerns and to assure that appropriate investigation and action is promptly taken. Customer feedback is an important source of information about an organization's performance. The verbal or written resident concerns received by staff, physicians and administrators provide vital information about improvement opportunities; -Responsibility: It is the responsibility of all management staff to understand and enforce this policy and the responsibility of all employees to abide by the policy;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0620 — isolated
    Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility's admission packet failed to include transportation as a billable, non-covered service not provided by the facility for one sampled resident (Resident #376). This deficiency had the potential to affect all residents who required transportation. The census was 60. Review of the facility's admission policy, date last reviewed 5/20, and showed: -Transportation was not addressed. Review of the facility's admission Packet, undated, showed: -Transportation was not addressed. Review of the List of Covered/Non-Covered Charges, undated, showed: -The list of ancillary services billable by supplying provider, transportation was not addressed. Review of Resident #376's medical record, showed: -admission date of 10/25/22; -The resident was alert and able to make needs and wants known. During interviews on 11/14/22 at approximately 11:30 A.M. and on 11/18/22 at 10:37 A.M., the resident said when he/she was at the facility in the past, the facility had transportation to take him/her to his/her doctor's appointments. Now the facility says they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident admitted to the facility with a deep tissue injury (DTI, an injury to underlying tissue below the skin's surface that results from prolonged pressure in an area of the body, usually a dark purple color) received an accurate admission skin assessment, physician notification of the wound and orders for wound care. The nursing staff also failed to ensure treatment orders once obtained four days after admission, were accurately entered onto the treatment administration record (TAR). This affected one of three residents reviewed for pressure injury care (Resident #420). The census was 60. The administrator was notified on 11/17/22, of the past non-compliance. The facility provided training and in-services for all staff regarding the facility's skin integrity, assessment and prevention of wounds and documentation policies. Review of the Skin Integrity, Assessment and Prevention of Wounds policy, revised 9/2022, showed: -Purpose: to prevent avoidable skin breakdown and pressure injuries, provide guidelines for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BJC HEALTHCARE — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 54.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 54.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 3 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CANNON, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2020
DUBINSKY, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2023
GOLDBERG, SUSANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2017
GORMAN, MARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2023
GUPTA, MAHENDRAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
HILLMAN, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2017
LEFTON, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/14/2017
LEMKEMEIR, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/07/2023
LIN, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
LOVE, KATHRYNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2016
LYNCH, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2009
MALIK, RAMEEZIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
MANNEN, ELIZABETHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2020
PATTERSON, DEBORAHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2016
PERLMUTTER, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2020
REID, SARAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/04/2018
SCHEEL, PAULIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2020
SEWARD, RACHELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/01/2024
SHER, KARENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
WARSHAW, HENRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2021
AREVALO, JESSEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/31/2020
FESSLER, PAULAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/11/2023
HAWIG, SCOTTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2026
HENDERSON, KATHERINEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2020
IROVIC, PAULIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/15/2021
LONGNECKER, CHRISTINAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2017
MARTIN, JACKIEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/03/2017
PETERS-LEWIS, ANGELLEENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/02/2017
SPENCER, MARYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2021
BARNES JEWISH HOSPITALOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/11/1992
BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2016
BROWN, CANDICEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
BYRNE, ROGERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 56 rows in the source record cover these 33 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$236K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 3%Medicare 34%Other / private 63%

This home reported $236K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$713per resident / day
operating cost
$21,680per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$675per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265439. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next