Bethesda Dilworth

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 431 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 180 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 350 beds and averages 128.0 residents a day — about 37% occupied, or roughly 222 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.22 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an acceptable skin management program was maintained to prevent pressure injury development and to report changes timely to the physician. The facility failed to complete wound assessments, including assessment and documentation of the location, stage, size, wound characteristics, periwound (the area around the wound) and wound edge description for two residents. (Residents #1 and #2). In addition, the facility failed to follow their policy for wound photographs and measurements for three residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3). The facility failed to contact Resident #1's physician prior to entering an order for a treatment. Additionally, the facility failed to follow their policy and complete a Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation (SBAR) when new and/or worsening wounds were observed and failed to notify the physician and family for three residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3). Resident #1's pressure ulcer worsened, developing drainage and a foul odor. The resident required emergency surgery…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-05-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident (Resident #1) who required staff assistance with transfers and mobility when going to bed. On [DATE], after the resident became adamant about staff putting him/her to bed, staff removed the resident from a sit to stand lift (a medical device that assists individuals with limited mobility in standing up from a seated position) and performed a 2-person assist transfer. The resident's right foot was caught under the bed during the transfer and sustained a comminuted tibial plateau fracture (a break in the lower bone below the knee that breaks into the knee joint and is displaced and not aligned) involving the medial (the bony surface on the top of the shin bone that corresponds to the big toe) and lateral (the surface that corresponds to the pinky toe) tibial plateau without significant displacement. The sample size was 3. The census was 149. Review of the facility's Mechanical Lifts, Use of policy and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation when the shift change narcotic count was not completed and one of the narcotic count sheets for one resident was inaccurate (Resident #7). The sample was 14. The census was 152 with 130 in certified beds. Review of the facility's Inventory Control of Controlled Substances Policy, revised 8/2023, showed:-Purpose: This policy sets forth the procedures for inventory control of controlled substances and establishes guidelines for the investigation of missing medications;-Scope: Level 2 policy affecting contracted pharmacies, Human Resources, nursing staff, and nursing management;-Responsibility: It will be the responsibility of the nursing staff members to know and comply with this policy and procedure. It is the responsibility of the Director of Nursing (DON) to maintain, enforce, and monitor compliance of this policy;-Policy: Practice processes will be followed to establish…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Deficiency Text Not Available

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure on-going resident centered therapeutic activities were provided to residents in the evenings and weekends as an integral part of their psychosocial well-being. In addition, the facility failed to ensure activities were offered to all residents who wished to attend (Residents #140, #155 and #99). This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility who wished to attend activites. The sample size was 25. The census was 145 with 126 in certified beds.1. During an interview on 7/23/25 at 8:31 A.M., the administrator said the Garden Terrace activity's calendar was the main calendar used for all activities in the facility. Review of the Garden Terrace Activity's Calendar, dated June 2025, showed: -Monday through Friday, no activities offered after 2:30 P.M.; -Saturdays, Catholic Mass at 10:30 A.M. in the chapel; -Sundays, no activities offered. Review of the Garden Terrace Activity's Calendar, dated July 2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their grievance policy and procedure for residents and family members to voice grievances and prompt the facility to resolve grievances for one resident (Resident #9). The failure has the potential to affect all residents. The sample size was 13. The census was 146 with 119 in certified beds.Review of the facility's Resident and Family Grievances policy, revised, February 2025, showed: -Purpose: To establish written guidelines for the filing of residents' grievances and to ensure that appropriate investigation and actions are promptly taken; Customer feedback is an important source of information about an organization's performance; The verbal or written resident grievances received by staff, physicians, and administration provide vital information about improvement opportunities. -Definitions: A resident grievance is a formal or informal written or verbal complaint that is made to the facility by a resident, or the resident's representative, regarding the resident's care when the complaint is not resolved at the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) accurately reflected the resident's status for one of three residents investigated for hospice (Resident #147). The facility identified 19 residents on hospice. The census was 145 with 126 in certified beds. Review of Resident #147's medical record, showed diagnoses included dementia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, lung disease), depression, anxiety, and malnutrition;-An electronic physician order sheet (ePOS) showed an order dated [DATE], for a Hospice consult;-A hospice election form showed hospice services began [DATE]. Review of the resident's significant change MDS, dated [DATE], showed:-Assessment Reference Date (ARD) [DATE];-Special services received while a resident: Hospice Care not marked;-Does the resident have a condition or chronic disease that may result in life expectancy less than six months: No. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two dependent residents received Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care (Residents #2 and #8). The sample was 25. The census was 145 with 126 in certified beds.Review of the facility's ADL care policy, dated October 2022, showed:-Purpose: To provide grooming and hygiene for each resident, assisting with bathing, dressing and elimination as needed;-Policy: It shall be the policy of the facility that each resident receives assistance with ADLs as needed throughout each day. Consideration will be given to making the experience as home-like and individual as possible;-Procedure: Give nail care as needed. Assist each resident with grooming. 1. Review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/1/25, showed:-Diagnoses included anxiety and heart failure;-Cognitively intact;-Substantial/maximal assistance required for shower/bath;-Supervision or touch…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify three residents physician and the representative/appropriate family member after the residents had a change in condition (Resident #1, #2, and #3). The sample was 4. The census was 151. Review of the facility's policy, Reporting of Condition Changes, incidents and injuries, revised 1/23, showed: -Purpose: To provide an orderly process for reporting changes in condition, incident or injuries involving residents; -Responsibility: It will be the responsibility of the licensed nurses to know and follow this policy; -Policy: It is the facility policy to report condition changes, incidents or injuries involving residents; -Practice: When reporting changes in condition or incidents, the following procedure should be followed: -1. Evaluate symptoms and/or injury. Complete overall head to toe assessment including taking vital signs, temperature and neuro checks as indicated. Document assessment and findings on SBAR (communication tool- Situation,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0660 — isolated
  Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focused on the resident's discharge goals and needs, desire to be discharged , the resident's capacity for discharge, including caregiver support availability, capacity, and capability to perform required care, and failed to involve the resident, family member, and the interdisciplinary team (IDT) in developing a discharge plan, with interventions to meet the resident's discharge goals and needs to ensure a smooth and safe transition to the post-discharge setting and reduce factors leading to preventable readmissions. The facility failed to document and include the evaluation of the resident's discharge needs and failed to discuss the results of the evaluation with the resident and family, and incorporate it into the discharge plan, which is a part of the comprehensive care plan. The facility failed to discuss with the resident, and the family member, and document the implications…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer treatments as ordered and failed to notify the physician when the ulcer developed drainage and a foul odor, shortly before the resident was discharged . The resident was discharged to home, alone, without home health registered nursing care services, and without education or instructions of how to care for the coccyx/sacral wound. Five residents were sampled, and problems were identified with one (Resident #5). The census was 149. Review of the facility policy for Skin Integrity, Assessment, and Prevention of Wounds/Other Skin Conditions, revised on 9/2022, showed: -Purpose: -To prevent avoidable skin breakdown and pressure injuries; -Provide guidelines for the treatment of impaired skin; -Provide guidelines for documentation. -Policy: -All residents will be assessed for the risk of skin breakdown; -Risk factors identified will be evaluated; -Interventions will be developed and implemented to minimize or stabilize risk;…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards. Staff failed to ensure a resident admitted from the hospital with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC, a thin, flexible tube that is inserted into a vein in the upper arm and guided (threaded) into a large vein above the right side of the heart, used to administer long term antibiotics and other medications) line, had orders for the PICC line including PICC line maintenance. Staff failed to verify why the PICC line was in place and failed to obtain and ensure continuity of antibiotic administration from the hospital related to a bacterial infection. The resident was not administered antibiotic medication for two days after admission into the facility (Resident #1). In addition, the facility failed to ensure a resident admitted with a PICC line placed at the hospital on 8/23/24, when admitted to the facility received PICC line orders including PICC line…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$88,946 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $88,946 — penalty dated 2025-04-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 51 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO