No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bethesda Southgate

5943 Telegraph Road, Saint Louis, MO 63129 · Non profit - Corporation · 130 certified beds · (314) 846-2000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (314) 846-2000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0606) — cited Sep 20191 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Sep 2019
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5715 Telegraph Rd · (314) 846-9190 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.3 mi
6071 Telegraph Rd · (314) 846-9265 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5640 Telegraph Rd · (314) 846-5770 · Call to confirm hours
Park
806 Cliff Cave Road · (314) 615-4386 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5740 Telegraph Rd · (314) 846-7911

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.4%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.3%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.9%2.3%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.4%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.3%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.2%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.6%25.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.3%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.4%17.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.7%23.5%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine17.2%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.3%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.1%13.7%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 346 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

65.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
72.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 72.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 129 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF65.4%CMS range 60.4–71.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 6.9–11.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge72.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified76.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.2%CMS range 3.2–8.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.861.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
1.25
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.41
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.32
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
31.5%
Total nursing turnover
10.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 81.5 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.32 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.41 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.52 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-07-18)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2022-11-03)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2019-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible by failing to ensure safety in the outdoor courtyard for one resident (Resident #235) with a history of falls when the ground next to the pathway to the courtyard had washed away, leaving an approximate 5 inch drop to the ground from the pathway. The resident self-propelled in a wheelchair to the courtyard and the wheelchair tipped off the side of the pathway. This failure resulted a serious injury of three fractured ribs and required the resident to be sent to the hospital. In addition, the facility failed to follow their transfer policy for one resident that was transferred in a Hoyer lift (mechanical lift) without the required two person assistance (Resident #26). The census was 137 with 99 residents in certified beds. 1. Review of the facility's fall management and reduction program policy, revised 3/2019, showed: -Purpose: To provide guidelines to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents were free from derogatory and disrespectful remarks from staff members (Resident #1 and Resident #2). The sample was three. The census was 106 with 79 in certified beds. Review of the facility's Resident Rights and Responsibility Policy, dated 6/2022, showed the following: -Purpose: To provide an awareness to all staff of the rights and responsibilities of each resident; -Responsibility: It is the responsibility of all employees to know and to comply with this policy; -Policy: -The 1987 Nursing Home Reform Law requires that each nursing home provide care for its residents in a manner that promotes and enhances the quality of life for each resident, ensuring dignity, choice and self-determination; -During orientation and minimally, at annual in-services, all employees shall be fully informed of resident rights and responsibilities. Bethesda will not tolerate infringement of resident rights by any employee. Allegations of violations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their infection control policy when staff failed to complete the annual one step of the employee tuberculosis (TB, a potentially serious infectious bacterial disease that mainly affects the lungs) screening tests for three employees. The census was 110 with 31 in state license beds. Review of the facility's Tuberculosis Screening and Testing of Employees and Volunteers, dated May 2024, showed the following: -Purpose: To establish guidelines for consistency in tuberculosis screening and testing for new employees and volunteers and annual testing and assessment for existing employees and volunteers. -Scope: Level I policy affecting all employees and all volunteers who work ten or more hours weekly in long term care communities which includes skilled nursing. -Responsibility: It is the responsibility of the Infection Preventionist/Employee Health Nurse or designee to perform annual health screenings. -There was no documentation regarding an annual one step tuberculin skin tests (TST). 1. Review of Staff Member A's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who self-administered medications had a self-administration of medications assessment, a physician's order, and a care plan completed for one of one resident (Resident (R) 134) reviewed for self-administration of medications out of a sample of 23 residents. Failure to assess and care plan residents for self-administration of medications increases the potential of medication errors for residents. Findings include: During medication pass observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 on 07/07/24 at 11:56 AM, she placed one tablet of ferrous sulfate 325 milligrams (mg) into a clear medication cup. LPN1 stated that was all R134 received at this time. LPN1 then entered R134's bedroom, where R134 was sitting up in her wheelchair with the overbed table in front of her. LPN1 placed the medication cup on the table and told R134 that the medication was her iron pill. Then LPN1 walked out of the room. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents and their representatives (Resident (R) 1) reviewed for facility initiated emergent hospital transfers were provided with written transfer notice that contained all required information. This failure has the potential to affect the resident and/or the Resident Representatives (RR) by not having the knowledge of where and why a resident was transferred, and/or how to appeal the transfer, if desired. Findings include: Review of R1's untitled and undated face sheet provided by the facility revealed the resident was most recently readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included intracranial hemorrhage, persistent vegetative state, and spastic hemiplegia. Review of R1's SNF-SBAR [Skilled Nursing Facility - Situation, Background, assessment, and Recommendation] document, dated 06/17/24 and provided by the facility, revealed . NP [nurse practitioner] came in and this nurse had reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure residents' pressure ulcers were assessed and received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing and to prevent worsening of pressure ulcers for one of three residents (Resident (R) 1) reviewed for pressure out of 23 sampled residents. R1 had a history of a pressure ulcer on her left pinky finger healing and reopening. The facility failed to ensure measures were taken to prevent the pressure ulcer from reopening and worsening from a stage 2 pressure ulcer to a stage 3 pressure ulcer. Additionally, the facility started treatment on the pressure ulcer without notifying and obtaining a physician's order. These failures placed R1 at risk for further worsening of the pressure ulcer. Findings include: Review of R1's untitled and undated face sheet provided by the facility revealed the resident was most recently readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included intracranial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure safe water temperatures in residents' bathrooms/personal sinks were maintained for two of 23 sampled residents (Resident (R) 51 and R17). The residents' bathroom sink hot water temperatures were greater than 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F). This failure placed both residents at risk for skin irritation, redness, pain, and burns. Findings include: 1. Review of R51's untitled and undated face sheet, provided by the facility, revealed the resident was most admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease and dementia. Review of R51's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/06/24, provided by the facility, revealed the facility assessed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score could not be obtained on the resident. The facility assessed R51 had short and long term memory problems, and was severely cognitively impaired when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice related to the transcription and following of physician's orders for 1 (Resident #11) of 6 residents reviewed for medication regimen review and related to following physician's orders regarding fluid restrictions for 1 (Resident #36) of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Bethesda Long Term Care Nursing Practices Policy and Procedure, updated 09/2022, specified It is the responsibility of the licensed nurse and the CMT [Certified Medication Technician] to understand and comply with this procedure, it is the responsibility of the Nurse Manager to maintain, enforce and monitor the procedure. The policy further indicated, Telephone and verbal orders should be documented in the resident's electronic medical record then read back to the ordering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the oxygen nasal canula was contained when not in use for 1 (Resident #41) of 2 sampled residents receiving oxygen therapy. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, revised 02/2019, revealed, Purpose: To provide guidelines for oxygen administration. Policy: A physician order is required to administer oxygen. The order should include the administrative device, liter flow and the parameters for use. Practice: 1. Oxygen should be ordered by the physician. The order should indicate the administrative device, the liters per minute, frequency and indications for use. A review of Resident #41's Resident Information document revealed the resident had diagnoses that included acute posthemorrhagic anemia (loss of a large amount of blood in a short period of time), dementia, and cerebral infarction (stroke). A review of Resident #41's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-25 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow an immediate family member to act on behalf of a resident in order to support the resident in decision-making for medical and financial matters. In addition, the facility failed to pursue a legal representative or court-appointed guardian after the immediate family member's rights were revoked by the facility and after it was determined that the resident was not capable of making their own medical and financial decisions (Resident #85). The facility census was 137 with 99 residents in certified beds. Review of the facility's Resident Handbook, revised [DATE], showed the following: -Resident's representative: The person designed in writing by the resident or resident's legal representative to receive communication on behalf of resident and to make health care or financial decisions, or both, on behalf of the resident. The resident's representative may be the resident's legal representative and/or the resident's immediate family member; -Surrogate:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-25 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolated
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to check the Nurse Aide Registry to ensure new employees did not have a Federal Indicator for abuse or neglect (which means the individual cannot work in a certified long-term care facility without a good cause waiver) prior to hire for two out of eight sampled employees. The census was 137 with 99 in certified beds. 1. Review of Floor Finisher A's employee record, showed the following: -Date of hire: 9/10/18; -No record of a Federal Indicator check. 2. Review of Activity Assistant B's employee record, showed the following: -Date of hire: 1/14/19; -No record of a Federal Indicator check. 3. During an interview on 9/24/19 at 4:00 P.M., Human Resources confirmed that the two employees did not have a federal indicator check completed. It was not included in their employee file. All new employees are required to have a federal indicator check completed. 4. During an interview on 9/24/19 at 5:15 P.M., the administrator said she would expect new employees to have a federal indicator check completed.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided or arranged by the facility, meet professional standards of quality by failing to clarify medication orders, for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident #191). The census was 137 with 99 in certified beds. Review of Resident #191's care plan, dated 9/20/19, showed: -Resident admitted for rehabilitation services following a hospitalization. Diagnoses included stroke, left sided weakness. Resident takes significant medication to help prevent blood clots which may cause bruising, or to bleed more easily. Please tell the nurse if you see any bruising or active bleeding. If resident complains of light headedness, or dizziness or appears to be light headed, or dizzy please tell the nurse. Review of the resident's physician orders sheet, showed an order dated 9/19/19 for Hydralazine (used to treat high blood pressure), 25 milligrams (mg), every 6 hours. Next to the order a note, *At home, patient was taking the medication with the following details: Special instructions, hold if systolic blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-25 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to complete a comprehensive discharge summary for one of three closed record sampled residents (Resident #86). The census was 137 with 99 in certified beds. Review of Resident #86's closed medical record, showed the resident discharged to the community on 6/22/19. Staff did not complete a discharge summary, which would include a final summary of the resident's status, a reconciliation of all pre and post discharge medications and a post-discharge plan of care. During interviews on 9/24/19 at 6:37 P.M. and 9/25/19 at 9:37 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said there is not a nursing discharge summary in the resident's file. It is the nurse's responsibility to ensure that the discharge packet is completed. After the nurse gives the information to the resident and places it in the chart, medical records then reviews it to ensure that it is complete.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene by failing to follow the perineal care (cleansing from the front of the hips, between the legs and buttocks) policy and ensure appropriate perineal care was provided for two of three observations (Residents #6 and #42). The census was 137 with 99 in certified beds. Review of the facility's perineal care policy, revised 11/2017, showed: -Purpose: To provide guidelines for performing perineal care; -Responsibility: it is the responsibility of all nursing staff to follow this policy; -Policy: Perineal care is to be done at least daily and as needed for incontinence for residents who are unable to perform self-care. Perineal care is done to cleanse the perineum (groin) to prevent growth of bacteria, prevent skin breakdown and promote good personal hygiene; -Perineal care: always work from the dirtiest to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when the facility failed to ensure the resident's physician's order for a hospice consult was followed timely (Resident #85). In addition, incorrect information regarding the resident being a ward of the state provided to the hospice company resulted in the resident's hospice consult being declined. The facility failed to clarify the error with the hospice company. This resulted in the resident not receiving hospice services, which are services provided above and beyond the services provided by the facility, to include additional care aides and nurses, chaplain services and bereavement services for the family for a year after the resident passes. The facility census was 137 with 99 residents in certified beds. Review of the facility's Resident Handbook, revised [DATE], showed the following: -Surrogate: A person identified from the Missouri statutes to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BRINKER, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2010
ESTHER, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2018
FALKER, FREDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
KELLER, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2019
MAYES, GARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
MCDONNELL, VERONICAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/25/2025
ROWE, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
TEIBEL, SAMANTHAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/27/2025
BYRNE, ROGERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/10/2014
HUTCHISON, PHILIPIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2020
KLINGLER, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MEIER, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2019
PEREGRIN, KIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/23/2020
ROONEY, PATRICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2026
BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/08/1999
SELECT REHABILITATION, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/10/2025
COSBY, DARLENEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/08/2021
KIMBALL, MICHELEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/21/2021
POPP, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/31/2025
REYNOLDS, CHRISTOPHERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/31/2025
ROLNICK, FELICEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/16/2024
BETHESDA LONG TERM CARE INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2000
ELITE MEDICAL STAFFING GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2017
MIDWEST STAFFING SOLUTIONS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 39 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 25%Medicare 10%Other / private 65%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$324per resident / day
operating cost
$9,851per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$356per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265756. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next