No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Blue Circle Rehab And Nursing

2939 Magazine Street, Saint Louis, MO 63106 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 90 certified beds · (314) 531-0500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (314) 531-0500 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0606) — most recent Mar 2024Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0568, F0569, F0570)3 actual-harm citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$13,042 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606) — most recent Mar 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0569, F0570)
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (80) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $13,042 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-29)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
915 N Grand Blvd · (314) 747-2066 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3117 Olive St · (314) 652-6336 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2526 Baldwin St · (314) 889-7600 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1820 Glasgow Ave · (314) 289-5300 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1524 N Leffingwell Ave · (314) 535-4754

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.4%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight15.9%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms80.8%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.6%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication5.9%25.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.8%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.5%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.6%23.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.6%63.5%79.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.262.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.812.331.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 6.9–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened9.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.981.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.30
RN hours/ resident / day
0.68
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.83
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.80
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
69.7%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 64.3 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.80 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.97 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-11)
22
at the previous standard inspection (2023-10-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

80 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 66 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of one of seven sampled residents (Resident #1) when staff allowed a resident with moderate cognitive impairment to leave the building unaccompanied. On 9/10/23 at approximately 8:00 A.M., Housekeeper G entered the front door keypad code to allow Resident #1 out of the building. The resident told Housekeeper G he/she was a staff member. Registered Nurse (RN) D witnessed the housekeeper open the door for the resident, but was not familiar enough with the resident to realize the housekeeper allowed a confused resident to leave the building. At least two other staff saw someone outside in the neighborhood during the day, but they were also not familiar enough with the resident to report this to management in a timely manner. The staff members assigned to the resident's care thought he/she was out on a leave of absence (LOA). The resident missed meals and medications throughout the day. Staff found the resident on 9/10/23 at 4:30 P.M. outside a church, approximately three blocks away, on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Medication Technician (CMT) D provided nutritional supplements as ordered to Residents #6, #15, #14, and #10. In addition, the facility failed to ensure Resident #10 received whole milk at meals as ordered. The facility identified 23 residents as receiving nutritional supplements. Four of those residents were sampled and problems were identified with all four. The census was 70.Review of the facility Weight Protocol last reviewed on 10/2025, showed:-Purpose: To provide a permanent, accessible record of residents' weights;-Procedure:-Monthly weights will be completed by the 15th of the month. Weights will be given to the Director of Nursing (DON) or Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) to input into the electronic medical record (EMR) within 5 business days;-The weights are reviewed weekly amongst IDT (interdisciplinary team);-Monthly weights will be reviewed by the RD (Registered Dietician) during their monthly visit and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2020-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately monitor one resident who had a physician's order and a speech therapist's recommendation for NPO (nothing by mouth). The facility staff allowed the resident to continue to eat solids foods and drink liquids after being identified as a high risk for aspiration (choking). The facility identified two residents who had orders for NPO. Both residents were sampled and problems were identified with one (Resident #18). In addition, the facility failed to implement resident-directed care and treatment consistent with the resident's preferences, physician's orders, and professional standards of practice by failing to reposition a resident with total dependence on staff for mobility, and consistently apply treatment to the resident's skin, which was 90% covered in burns (Resident #23). In addition, facility staff failed to promptly notify the physician of one closed sample resident (Resident #86) of a condition change. That resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2020-10-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident #192), who the facility identified as receiving intravenous (IV) antibiotics, received a dose at the correct infusion rate and failed to ensure IV antibiotics were administered to the resident as prescribed by the physician. The resident received three different IV antibiotics due to an abcess that occurred after brain surgery. The sample size was 16._The facility census was 65. 1. Review of Resident #192's facility face sheet, showed the following: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, stroke and cerebral aneurysm-unruptured (a bulge or ballooning of a blood vessel in the brain). Review of the physician's order sheet (POS), showed an order, dated 10/20/20, to infuse Vancomycin (antibiotic) in 200 milliliters (ml) normal saline (NS) every 12 hours for a diagnosis of cerebral aneurysm, unruptured. Review of the care plan, dated 10/20/20, showed IV access and IV…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label insulin pens per facility policy for nine of 10 insulin pens in use for residents at the facility. The census was 69.Review of the facility's Insulin Labeling and Storage policy, dated [DATE], showed:-All insulins will be stored in the refrigerator on delivery until opened for usage;-New insulins removed from the reiterator needs to be dated and include the resident's name. This includes both bottles or pens;-Insulins are only good for 28 days after opening. Observation and interview on [DATE] at 10:07 A.M., showed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B identified the medication cart that contained the insulin pens in use for all residents. Observation at this time showed 10 insulin pens in the top drawer. A sticker was placed on all pens with a space for the date opened and the date expired. There were two insulin aspart (rapid acting insulin), two insulin degludec (ultra long-lasting insulin), three Lantus (long-acting insulin), and two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was provided adequate assistance to prevent accidents for one resident who required the use of a Hoyer lift (full body mechanical lift) when staff transferred the resident with the use of a gait belt (Resident #3). The sample was 7. The census was 69.Review of the facility's Gait Belt Transfer policy, dated October 2023, showed:-Review Kardex for number of staff transfer assistance needed;-Fasten the gait belt securely around the resident's waist with the buckle at the side;-Position one hand under the buckle;-Position the other hand under the belt;-Transfer the resident using proper body mechanics. Review of Resident #3's medical record, showed:-Diagnoses included hemiparesis and hemiplegia (weakness and/or paralysis on one side of the body) following a stroke on right dominate side;-A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 12/8/25, showed sever cognitive impairment. Functional limited range of motion to one side,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-11 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — widespread
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of the residents by failing to ensure the quality of the labs obtained when they used expired Covid tests to test employees and residents for Covid-19. The facility failed to check with the manufacturer to see if the expiration date waiver was extended. The waiver was not extended. The census was 72. Review of the facility's Response to Covid-19 protocol, last reviewed 4/2024, showed Covid-19 testing: Covid-19 testing will be conducted in accordance with current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) requirements, utilizing Point of Care and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing as appropriate. During interview on 12/5/24 at approximately 11:00 A.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing said the facility had one case of Covid-19 due to an employee testing positive. The facility began testing staff and residents. The last test was done today to see if the Covid-19 precautions could be removed. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure recipes were followed while preparing meals, for one of two meal services observed. The sample was 19. The census was 72. Observation on 12/9/24 at 8:54 A.M., of the lunch meal service prep, showed [NAME] H removed steak patties from a box and place them on the skillet top. After the steaks were cooked, [NAME] H placed the steak patties into a tin and placed the tin on the steam cart for meal service. Review on 12/10/24 at 8:20 A.M., of the Swiss steak recipe, showed: -Ingredients: beef cutlets, salt, black pepper, vegetable oil, onions, celery, and diced tomatoes; -Method of preparation: season cutlets with salt and pepper. [NAME] in hot oil. Place on baking pans. Sauté onions and celery in same fat. Place over meat. Pour tomatoes over cutlets. Cover baking pan with foil. Bake for 2 to 2 ½ hours. Observation on 12/9/24 at 9:17 A.M., of the lunch meal service prep, showed [NAME] H placed three slices of bread into the blender with three, 1 cup scoops of stewed tomatoes to prepare the pureed stewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and maintain monthly account reconciliations of the facility's bank statements for 12 of 12 months. The facility also failed to reconcile the resident trust at the end of the month for two months. The census was 72. Review of the facility's undated resident rights policy, showed: -Right regarding financial affairs: Manage his or her financial affairs; -Information about available services and the charges for each service; -Personal funds or more than $100 ($50 for residents whose care is funded by Medicaid) deposited by the facility in a separate interest-bearing account, and financial statements quarterly or upon request; -Not be charged for services covered by Medicaid or Medicaid. Review of the facility's resident trust, showed: -January 2024, reconciled on 1/1/24, with a balance of $29,370.97. The statement only included the Resident Fund Management Service (RFMS) statement. No documentation of the bank statement or end of month reconciliation; -February 2024, reconciled on 2/1/24, with a balance of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility failed to launder dirty linen, leaving residents' rooms malodorous (Resident #38 and #24). Two residents with air conditioner units had gaps, allowing air to leak (Residents #23 and #37). One resident had broken or missing tile in the room (Resident #21). One resident had broken base boards and window blinds (Resident #13). The facility failed to ensure resident furniture was repaired for one resident with broken drawers (Resident #1). In addition, one resident had an active leak underneath the air conditioner unit (Resident #65). The sample size was 19. The census was 72. Review of the facility's Cleaning of Resident Rooms policy, dated July 2024, showed: -The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for cleaning and disinfecting resident rooms and identify potential pest control concerns; -General guidelines: -Housekeeping surfaces will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care needs were met. The facility failed to ensure one resident was repositioned and toileted timely and did not have dirty nails (Resident #4), failed to ensure one resident's lips were cared for resulting in dry, cracked lips (Resident #65), failed to ensure one resident was free from body odor and chin hair (Resident #3), failed to ensure one resident's face was cleaned (Resident #1), and failed to ensure another resident had clean nails (Resident #24). The sample was 19. The census was 72. Review of the facility's Turning and Repositioning policy, reviewed 1/2023, showed: -When the resident is sitting up in a chair, they shall be repositioned at least every two hours or per the plan of care. This may be accomplished by shifting the resident's weight to the side or the opposite side of the previous position. Review of the facility's Personal Care Needs policy, reviewed 1/2022, showed:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 85.042 (14) cl. II* Resident #20 Resident #278 Resident #30 Resident #32 Not priming needle, walking away from resident with medications, and eye was not pulled down for eye drops. [NAME] will organize Resident #20 FTag Initiation 12/10/24 10:09 AM CMT was placing the box of eye drops under her arm, and did not pull the left eye lid down. Resident #30 FTag Initiation 12/10/24 10:13 AM Nurse did not prime insulin pen Resident #32 FTag Initiation 12/10/24 10:11 AM Nurse did not prime the insulin pen. Resident #278 FTag Initiation 12/10/24 10:24 AM CMT left resident with medications in the therapy gym and went to get resident water bottle.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored per acceptable standards of practice when the facility failed to store medications, located in the Assistant Director of Nursing's (ADON) office, locked, and not accessible to individuals without authority to access the medications. The facility identified four medication carts, two treatment carts, and two medication rooms. The ADON's office was not identified as a medication storage room. The ADON failed to ensure it was secured when she left her office. The office had several shelves on the back wall that contained multiple bottles of over-the-counter medications and vitamins. An open bottle of medication was also found in the ADON's office that was not labeled. The sample was 19. The census was 72. Review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy, revised 7/17/24, included: -Lock medication cart before entering resident/patient room. Never leave the medication cart open and unattended; -Lock the cart and store in a secure, locked location; -Keep…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were in working order for two sampled residents (Residents #24 and #29). In addition, the facility found issues with call lights in 24 additional resident bedrooms. This had a potential to affect all residents who resided in rooms with non-functioning call lights. The sample was 19. The census was 72. Review of the facility's undated call light policy, showed: -Purpose: To respond to resident/patient's request and needs; -Procedure: -Answer call lights in a reasonable amount of time; -Determine resident/patient's request; -Turn off call light; -Listen to resident/patient for further requests or needs; -Respond to request. If unable to meet request obtain assistance from caregiver that can meet request; -Assist resident/patient as needed to a comfortable position with call light within reach. 1. Review of the facility's nurse call system report, dated 11/19/24, showed: -room [ROOM NUMBER]: Does not annunciate right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 66 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice for one resident who had an order to get up before lunch and required the use of a Hoyer lift (mechanical lift) when the staff could not find a Hoyer lift pad and did not obtain another one for use (Resident #21). The sample was 19. The census was 72. Review of Resident #21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/24/24, showed: -Cognitive impairment; -Dependent, helper does all the effort and resident does none of the effort to complete the activity for toileting, shower/bathing, upper and lower body dressing, and personal hygiene; -Substantial/Maximum assistance for resident to roll left and right; -Setup or clean up assistance for eating; -Incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Diagnoses included diabetes, aphasia (inability to understand or express speech), stroke, anxiety and depression. Review of the resident's electronic Physician Order Sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure privacy during care for one resident (Resident #3). The census was 72. The sample was 19. Review of the facility's Resident's Rights policy, revised 1/5/22, showed the following: -Protocol: the facility will address ethical issues and respect resident rights in providing care. The facility recognizes the resident right to a quality of life that supports privacy, confidentiality, independent expression, choice, and decision making, consistent with state law and federal regulation; -Procedure: explain rights to resident and/or responsible party at or before admission. Give resident and/ or responsible party a copy of the resident rights in writing. Involve residents/responsible party in all aspects of care. Involve resident/responsible party in resolving conflicts about care decisions. Involve residents. Review of Resident #3's Medical Record showed: -Diagnoses included aphasia (language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate), dementia, and major depressive disorder; -Severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an appropriate discharge for one sampled resident (Resident #7) out of four residents sampled for discharge. Resident #7 received an immediate discharge after a resident to resident altercation that was de-escalated by staff without incident or any reported injuries. Despite the absence of severe behaviors, the facility issued an immediate discharge, citing the resident's care and protective oversight currently exceeded current capacity. The census was 72. Review of the facility's Room Changes, Transfers, and Discharge policy, revised July 2022, showed: -Protocol: The purpose of this Protocol is to inform residents/patients of the facility's protocol regarding room changes, transfers, and/or discharges and to provide sufficient preparation and orientation to residents/patients to ensure safe and orderly room changes, transfers, and/or discharges; -Transfers and discharges will be conducted according to State and Federal regulations;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman in the timely manner after an immediate discharge was issued to one resident after a resident-to-resident altercation. The facility issued an immediate discharge, citing the resident's care and protective oversight currently exceeded current capacity (Resident #7). The census was 72. Review of the facility's Room Changes, Transfers, and Discharge policy, revised July 2022, showed: -Protocol: The purpose of this Protocol is to inform residents/patients of the facility's protocol regarding room changes, transfers, and/or discharges and to provide sufficient preparation and orientation to residents/patients to ensure safe and orderly room changes, transfers, and/or discharges; -Transfers and discharges will be conducted according to State and Federal regulations; -Reasons for which a resident/patient may be discharged from the facility: The facility determines that the discharge is necessary for the resident's/patient's welfare and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure when a resident is being admitted to a Medicaid certified facility, regardless of payment source, a DA-124 Level 1 screen (used to evaluate for the presence of mental illness and intellectual disability, to determine if a preadmission screening\resident review (PASRR) Level 2 screen is required) was completed, for one of six residents sampled for the PASRR requirements (Resident #4). The census was 72. Review of the facility's PASRR Protocol showed: -Procedure: Review hospital records and determine PASRR. Does the resident meet level of care and/or require a Level 2 PASRR to be appropriate for admission. Was a Level 1 screen for possible mental disability, intellectual disability, or a related condition completed prior to admission or if the resident was expected to be in the facility less than 30 days and remained in the facility for more than 30 days (as allowed by the state) was a Level 1 screen performed, if not the social service designee will implement the process. If the mental disability, intellectual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish when staff failed to accommodate one resident's communication needs (Resident #3). The sample was 19. The census was 72. Review of the facility's communication board policy, undated, showed: -Purpose: communication between resident and caregiver is vital and when that ability to communicate is lost or impaired by illness, trauma, medical process or language barriers, communication is more vital; -Features: pain scale for determining where and how bad one hurts. Clear pictures depicting wants, needs, ailments, comforts, questions, emotions. Easy to understand instructions for patient response alternatives. Alphabet for spelling out words. Numbers for numerical information; -Benefits: helps ease distress, easy to understand and use, well-organized, disposable for infection control, adaptable can be folded cut or written on. Review of Resident #3's medical record, showed: -Diagnoses included aphasia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive care consistent with professional standards. One resident had physician's orders for blood sugar checks and the orders were not followed (Resident #62). One resident had a wound on the right lower leg with no documentation of assessment (Resident #23). The sample size was 19. The census was 72. Review of the facility's policy for Physicians Orders, reviewed 5/22/2023, showed: -At the time each resident is admitted , the facility will have physician orders for their immediate care. Physician's orders will be verified by the attending physician at the facility. All physician's orders will be dated and signed according to state and federal regulations. 1. Review of Resident #62's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/15/24, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses include a recent amputation, anemia (low iron in the blood), coronary artery…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bowel and bladder received appropriate treatment and services after an incontinence episode, when staff placed two briefs on a resident. The resident's briefs became very saturated with urine and uncomfortable. Staff also failed to cleanse all areas of the skin potentially contaminated by urine for the same resident (Resident #21). The sample was 19. The census was 72. Review of the facility's Care of Incontinent Resident Policy and Procedure Policy, revised 1/2022, included: -Purpose: To have residents clean and dry; -Policy: All resident who are identified as being incontinent will have incontinence care provided every two hours and as needed. Note: There is a half hour leeway to round times; -Procedure: -Explain procedure; -Wash hands and put on gloves; -Remove excess feces and urine; -Remove gloves and wash hands. Apply clean gloves; -Spray peri-wash on wet washcloth and cleanse with wet washcloth; -Rinse washcloth and wipe the area clean, if cleaning feces, use a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory services provided were consistent with professional standards of practice for one resident (Resident #37) when staff failed to follow the physician orders for the rate of the oxygen, and to change and date the oxygen tubing. The sample size was 19. The census was 72. Review of the facility's Oxygen Safety Precautions policy, revised 8/29/22, showed: -Oxygen is very safe when you use it properly. Oxygen will not explode or burn. Oxygen will cause anything that is burning to burn faster and hotter. By following these safety rules, you will create a safe environment for the use of oxygen; -Administer oxygen per physician orders. Review of the facility's Cleaning and Disinfection of Environmental Surfaces and Equipment, reviewed 7/2024, showed: -Environmental surfaces will be clean and disinfected according to the current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations for disinfection of health care facilities and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) bloodborne pathogen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to post the correct date for staffing information on a daily basis for 4 out of 5 days. The daily staffing sheet includes the total number of hours worked by categories of licensed staff, identifying Registered Nurse (RN) hours and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), directly responsible for resident care per shift. The census was 72. Review of the nurse staffing information, posted at the front entrance of the facility, showed: -On 12/5/24 at 10:30 A.M., the staffing sheet was dated 11/27/24; -On 12/6/24 at 10:15 A.M., the staffing sheet was dated 11/27/24; -On 12/9/24 at 8:30 A.M., the staffing sheet was dated 12/6/24; -On 12/10/24 at 9:15 A.M., the staffing sheet was dated 12/6/24. At 11:45 A.M., the staffing sheet was dated 12/10/24; -On 12/11/24 at 9:25 A.M., there was no staffing sheet posted at the front desk. At 9:45 A.M., the staffing sheet was dated 12/11/24. During an interview on 12/11/24 at 12:03 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the nurse staffing should be updated daily and should be accurate.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 28 opportunities observed, four errors occurred, resulting in a 14.28% error rate when the insulin pens were not primed prior to administering to residents, medication was not given in the form as ordered by the physician, and eye medication was not administered properly (Residents #32, #30, #21 and #20). The sample was 19. The census was 72. Review of the facility's Medication Administration-Insulin policy, undated, showed: -Standard of Practice: the nurse will ensure prior to administering each dose of insulin that the correct type and dose of insulin and number of units ordered are checked against the physician's order, the insulin vial, and syringe before the patient receives the insulin; -Standard of care: the resident who has been prescribed insulin can expect that the medication be administered in the correct form and dosage, at the correct time, with the correct injection technique with concurrent observation of benefit and potential side effects…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable standards of practice for infection prevention and control when staff failed use enhanced barrier precautions while providing care for a resident who had an indwelling catheter and a feeding tube and failed to prevent infection by leaving a gravity bag (urinary collection device) lay on the ground (Resident #3) and failed to change gloves while providing care (Resident #21). In addition, staff placed medication under their arm while administering medications (Residents #10 and #20). The sample was 19. The census was 72. Review of the facility's Infection Control policy, dated 7/2022, showed: -Policy Statement: The Blue Circle Rehab and Nursing infection control policies and practices are intended to facilitate maintaining a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent and manage transmission of diseases and infections. Review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised March 24, 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse was not violated, when one resident was abused by another resident resulting in a cigarette burn to the forehead (Residents #4 and #5). The census was 75. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, dated as revised on August 1, 2022, showed: -Abuse --Willful infliction of injury; -In the case of resident-to-resident interaction, the residents are separated from one another until the investigation has been completed. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/9/23, showed: -Cognitively intact; -No behaviors; -Diagnoses included schizophrenia (a serious mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally) and anxiety disorder. Review of the resident's care plan, in use at the time of the incident, showed: -Focus: TOBACCO USE/SMOKING: Resident wishes to smoke/use tobacco products/vape while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurses completed and documented the weekly risk skin assessments and weekly wound assessments and failed to upload wound reports to resident's electronic medical record (EMR) in a timely manner. In addition, the facility failed to document when a new wound was found, who was contacted and what measures were put in place and also failed investigate a wound caused by trauma, and report and repair a broken wheelchair which caused a wound on a resident (Resident #1). The sample size was three. The census was 75. Review of the facility's skin program policy and procedure, undated, showed: -Purpose: The purpose of the skin program is to ensure that every resident's skin condition is observed/evaluated on admission and a comprehensive and interdisciplinary care plan is developed and maintained to treat actual and/or prevent potential skin problems; -Policy: All residents are observed/evaluated upon admission and as needed for actual and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide protective oversight for one resident (Resident #5) who was intentionally burned on the forehead with a cigarette by another resident (Resident #4). The census was 75. Review of the facility's Smoking Policy, revised on 8/1/22, showed: -Policy: Residents who smoke will be assessed for needed assistance upon admission, quarterly and with a significant change; -All residents are to be supervised while smoking; -Staff will light all smoking products and provide other assistance and protective devices as needed; -Residents are not allowed to supervise or assist other residents in smoking; -The failure of residents and visitors to comply with these rules places others at risk for injury. The facility may have to insist that resident and family find alternative placement if smoking and safety rules are not followed; -Violations of the smoking policy may result in revocation of smoking privileges. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's hairnet/beard net policy when handling food, and failed to keep the kitchen equipment clean and floors free of dust, grease and grime. In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the facility's handwashing policy. The census was 66. Review of the facility's dietary/food handling policy, revised 1/22/09, showed the following: -Purpose: To provide guidelines for the safe preparation, handling, and storage of perishable food and proper environmental cleaning; -Policy: Clean uniforms must be worn daily. Hairnets or caps must be worn in food service areas. Environmental surfaces shall be sanitized per facility guidelines. Review of the facility's kitchen cleaning schedule, undated, showed the following: -Day shift responsibilities: sweeping/mopping floors, clean all freezers and refrigerators interior and exterior, walls clean and free of splatter; -Night shift responsibilities: sweeping/mopping floors, clean all freezers and refrigerators interior and exterior, walls clean and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to maintain resident dignity by not speaking to and assisting one resident (Resident #29) during personal care in respectful and timely manner. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure two residents were not left exposed to the hallway when they were in their rooms (Resident #38 and Resident #262) and ensure one resident's brief was not exposed when brought to the main dining room by nursing staff (Resident #5). The sample was 17. The census was 66. Review of the facility's Resident's Rights policy, reviewed 1/5/22, showed the following: -Protocol: The facility will address ethical issues and respect resident rights in providing care. The facility recognizes the resident right to a quality of life that supports privacy, confidentiality, independent expression, choice, and decision making, consistent with state law and federal regulation; -Procedure: Explain rights to resident and/or responsible party at or before admission. Give resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements to residents and/or their representatives (Residents #4, #29, #21 and #38) during the previous 12 months. This deficient practice affected 46 residents whose funds were handled by the facility. The census was 66. Review of the facility's Resident Fund Management Service (RFMS) policy, last revised January 2022, showed: -Protocol. The facility will safeguard and manage resident funds in accordance with state regulation; -Procedure includes: All written accounts of the residents' funds shall be reconciled monthly and a written statement showing the current balance and all transactions shall be given to the resident, his/her designee, guardian and conservator, or conservator on a quarterly basis. 1. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/10/23, showed the resident as cognitively intact. During an interview on 10/27/23 at 8:48…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable and homelike environment for all residents when staff failed to ensure shower rooms were clean and accessible for residents (Residents #6 and #21). The facility failed to ensure soiled linen and trash bins were emptied and cleaned appropriately to reduce offensive odors in resident areas. The sample was 17. The census was 66. 1. Observations of the 200 hall shower room, showed: -On 10/23/23 at 12:24 P.M., a bathtub filled with pillows. The bathtub was inaccessible, surrounded by equipment, including mechanical lifts, a wheelchair, and shower beds and chairs. The floor was grimy throughout the shower room. Feces were smeared on the toilet seat; -On 10/24/23 at 11:11 A.M., 10/25/23 at 11:16 A.M., 10/25/23 at 12:31 P.M., and 10/25/23 at 2:30 P.M., a bathtub was filled with pillows. The bathtub was inaccessible, surrounded by equipment, including mechanical lifts, a wheelchair, and shower beds and chairs. The floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals are labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted practices. These deficient practices affected two of four medication carts reviewed and two out of two medications rooms reviewed. The census was 66. Review of the facility's Medication Storage policy, dated November 2021, showed; -Controlled substances that require refrigeration are stored within a lock box within the refrigerator. This box must be secure to the inside of the refrigerator; -Drugs dispensed in the manufacturer's original container will carry the manufacturer's expiration date. Once opened, these will be good to use until the manufacturer's expiration date is reached unless the medication is: -In a multi-dose injectable vial; -An item for which the manufacturer has specified a usable life after opening; -When the original seal of the manufacturer's container or vial is initially broken, the container or vial will be dated, if applicable for medications requiring a shortened expiration date; -The nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff followed recipes while cooking in order to provide residents with the required nutrition. In addition, the facility failed to provide Resident #261 with double portions per the resident's personal preference. The sample was 16. The census was 66. 1. Observation on 10/24/23, showed: -9:49 A.M., [NAME] I got a package of meatballs out of the freezer to use as an alternate to pork steaks. [NAME] I said there were not enough pork steaks for all the residents due to the delivery truck being late; -10:46 A.M., [NAME] I put a pot on the stove with butter and pepper to melt for the mashed potatoes. He/She did not measure the butter or the amount of pepper used; -10:54 A.M., [NAME] I poured from a jug of barbecue sauce over the eight pork steaks without measuring the amount used. The jug was approximately 80 ounces; -11:01 A.M., [NAME] I took a tray of 6 pork steaks out of the oven, poured barbecue sauce over them, and then placed the pork steaks back into the oven; -12:35 P.M., [NAME] I plated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was delivered to residents at an appetizing temperature, which affected the residents on the 100 and 200 hallways and included three out of the 16 sampled residents (Residents #41, #6, and #38). The census was 66. Review of the facility's Dietary/Food Handling policy, revised 1/22/09, showed the following: -Purpose: To provide guidelines for the safe preparation, handling, and storage of perishable food and proper environmental cleaning. -Policy: Temperatures must be maintained at the following (Fahrenheit (F)) settings for the items indicated below: Cold food -45 degrees or below, Frozen food -0 (zero) degrees or below, Hot food -140 degrees or above, All potentially hazardous food must be kept below 45 degrees or above 140 degrees during transportation. Reheated previously cooked food must be heated to acceptable temperatures before being served to the resident. All raw fruits and vegetables must be washed thoroughly. -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-27 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control system when multiple bugs were noted throughout the hallways, resident rooms (Residents #6, #21, and #2), and in the kitchen. The facility census was 66. Review of the Cleaning the Resident's Room policy, updated 7/2022, showed the following: -Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for cleaning and disinfecting residents' rooms and identify potential pest control concerns; -General Guidelines: Personnel should remain alert for evidence of rodent activity (droppings) and report such findings to the Environmental Services Director; -Note: Any signs of pests (ants, rodents) are to be reported immediately to the Housekeeping Supervisor and/or Administrator and reported to the pest control company. 1. Review of the facility's pest control company commercial services agreement, dated 3/8/23, showed the following: -American roaches were observed in the kitchen at the time of service;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of needs by failing to ensure one resident (Resident #2) with hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) had a call system he/she was able to use, and by failing to ensure call systems were within reach for two residents with impaired mobility (Residents #2 and #5). The sample was 17. The census was 66. 1. Review of Resident #2's electronic medical record (EMR), showed diagnoses included hemiplegia, epilepsy (seizure disorder), high blood pressure, abnormal posture, dementia without behavioral disturbance, depression, anxiety, and psychotic disorder. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/8/23, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Upper and lower extremity impairment to both sides; -Dependent in the following mobility areas: Roll left and right, sit to lying, lying to sitting on the side of the bed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate self-determination for one resident who was dependent on staff for transfer assistance, by failing to ensure the resident was out of bed daily, in accordance with the resident's preferences (Resident #2). The sample was 17. The census was 66. Review of Resident #2's electronic medical record (EMR), showed diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), epilepsy (seizure disorder), high blood pressure, abnormal posture, dementia without behavioral disturbance, depression, anxiety and psychotic disorder (mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality). Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/8/23, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Upper and lower extremity impairment to both sides; -Dependent in the following mobility areas: roll left and right, sit to lying, lying to sitting on the side of the bed, chair/bed-to-chair transfer. Review of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident requests for less than $100.00 ($50.00 for Medicaid residents) are honored within the same day (Resident #21). The sample was 17. The census was 66. Review of the facility's Resident Fund Management Service (RFMS) policy, last revised January 2022, showed: -Protocol. The facility will safeguard and manage resident funds in accordance with state regulation; -Procedure includes: A petty cash fund up to fifty ($50) for each resident for whom the facility is holding funds may be kept in the facility and shall be maintained separately from the facility's funds; -The policy did not provide guidance for staff to ensure resident requests for less funds than $100.00 or $50.00 are honored within the same day. Review of Resident #21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/2/23, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses included stroke and depression. During an interview on 10/27/23 at 8:52 A.M., the resident said the facility holds his/her money…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate code statuses were entered into the medical record for 3 out of 17 residents reviewed for code status orders at the facility (Residents #16, #11 and #5). The census was 66. Review of the facility's Advanced Directives clinical operations policy, revised [DATE], showed: -The facility will comply with a resident's advanced care directives in pre-determining their healthcare future, whenever possible, should they become terminally ill and unable to communicate or in an emergency situation; -The facility will actively seek to obtain information regarding advanced directive wishes from each resident; -Any existing or active directives will be reviewed and copied into the medical record at the time of admission. 1. Review of Resident #16's medical record, showed: -The resident was admitted on [DATE] and resides at the facility for long-term care; -Diagnoses included heart failure, atrial fibrillation (an irregular, rapid heartbeat), malignant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate care plans individualized for each resident's needs for 3 of 17 sampled residents. The facility failed to update care plans to ensure weight loss and nutritional interventions were included after two residents suffered unplanned weight loss (Residents #41 and #43) and failed to update a care plan after removal of a catheter (Resident #48). The census was 66. Review of the facility's Policy for Comprehensive Care Planning, revised on 1/2022, showed: -Purpose: to develop and maintain an individualized care plan for residents residing in the facility; -Goal: the comprehensive care plan will be completed within 7 days of the Care Area Assessment (CAA) completion date as indicated on the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), as instructed in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual; -The comprehensive care plan will be completed within 7 days of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice when skin assessments were not completed on a weekly basis by a licensed nurse in accordance with the facility's policy, for two residents identified as very high risk for developing pressure ulcers (Residents #2 and #5). In addition, the facility failed to ensure one resident received a medicated shampoo, as ordered by his/her physician (Resident #38). The sample was 17. The census was 66. Review of the facility's Skin Program Policy and Procedure policy, showed: -Purpose: The purpose of the skin program is to ensure that every resident's skin condition is observed/evaluated on admission and a comprehensive and interdisciplinary care plan is developed and maintained to treat actual and/or prevent potential skin problems; -Policy: All residents are observed/evaluated upon admission and as needed (PRN) for actual and/or potential skin problems. All residents will receive an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care by failing to ensure residents were cleaned following incontinence in a timely manner for two residents (Residents #29 and #38) and failed to ensure one resident's feet were assessed and treated for dry skin (Resident #36). The sample was 17. The census was 66. Review of the facility's Personal Care Needs policy, revised on 1/10/19, showed the following: -Protocol: The facility strives to promote a healthy environment and prevent infection by meeting the personal care needs of the residents. The facility also provide the needed support when the resident performs their ADLs. The Interdisciplinary Plan of Care (IPOC) will address the individual needs and preferences of the resident. Personal care and ADL support will be provided according to the resident Plan of Care. Personal care and support include but is not limited to the following: ambulation, assistance with meals, bath/shower, catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards. One resident had a change in his/her respiratory condition and staff failed to notify the physician and perform respiratory assessments (Resident #4). One resident was admitted to the facility with a chronic (long term) wound under his/her left arm and staff failed to document the wound on admission or obtain treatment orders for the wound (Resident #163). In addition, staff failed to identify a skin rash and obtain treatments orders for one resident (Resident #38). The sample was 17. The census was 66. Review of the facility's Episodic and Narrative Documentation Policy, reviewed 1/5/22, showed: -Protocol: Documentation will occur in the nurses' progress notes to reflect a change in status, event, or notification of the responsible party or physician. If the documentation is initiated due to a change in status or an event, the documentation should occur each shift for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to document an unwitnessed fall, complete fall documentation after the fall, notify the responsible party and physician of the fall and have fall interventions in place for one resident (Resident #163). The sample was 17. The census was 66. Review of the facility's Fall Programs policy, reviewed January, 2023, showed: -Purpose: To identify all residents who have a high risk for fall and to ensure adequate interventions are in place to prevent a major injury; -Procedure: -The fall risk assessment will be completed on every resident upon admission and re-admission by the nurse on the shift that the resident is admitted on ; -When a resident is identified as being at high risk for fall, this will be identified on the baseline care plan upon admission. -When the resident falls, the nurses will assess the resident and document in the electronic medical record (EMR); -Neurological checks (an assessment of pupils, mental orientation and strength of extremities) and will be initiated for all un-witnessed falls; -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory services provided were consistent with professional standards of practice for one resident (Resident # 4) when staff failed to obtain physician orders related to changing oxygen tubing and nebulizer (route in which breathing medicine is administered) tubing and follow the physician orders for oxygen. The sample was 17. The census was 66. Review of the facility's Disinfection and Cleaning policy, updated July, 2022, showed: -Oxygen tubing is to be dated, changed out weekly and as needed and placed in a plastic bag when not in use. High humidity nebulizer (HHN) equipment is to be dated and washed after each use and is to be changed out weekly and placed in a plastic bag when not in use. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/10/23, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Requires oxygen therapy; -Diagnoses include heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, lung disease that prevent the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of record for all controlled drugs with sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for two out of four medication carts reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents with controlled substance orders. The census was 66. Review of the facility Medication Storage policy, dated November 2021, showed: -At each shift change, or when keys are transferred, a physical inventory of all controlled substances, including refrigerated items, is conducted by two licensed nurses and is documented on the shift change form; -Controlled substance accountability records are kept in the medication administration record, or designated book. Completed accountability records are submitted to the Director of Nurses (DON) and kept on file for five years at the facility or per facility and/or state regulatory requirements. 1. Review of the controlled substance shift change count sheet for 100 and 500 halls, dated September 2023, showed: -39 out of 90 shifts, with only one nurse initials on the shift change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #163) was free from significant medication error by not informing the pharmacy that a script from the physician was required for the resident's Drobnabinol (a controlled substance that stimulates appetite and helps control nausea and vomiting) and Tramadol (a pain reliever). The resident missed 11 doses of his/her Drobnabinol and his/her Tramadol was not readily available to administer to the resident if the resident requested it. The sample size was 17. The census was 66. Review of Resident #163's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/12/23, showed: -admission date 10/5/23; -Cognitively intact. Review of the resident's face sheet, showed diagnoses that included: breast cancer, bone cancer, blindness to both eyes and abnormal weight loss. Review of the resident's care plan, in use at the time of survey, showed: -Focus: The resident is at risk to experience pain due to factors contributing to pain/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure permanent facility Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) received a minimum of 12 hours of ongoing clinical education annually. One out of one staff, identified as a permanent facility CNA working at the facility for over a year, did not complete the required 12 hours of ongoing clinical education required within the hire date to hire date annual anniversary timeline. The facility census was 67. 1. Review of the facility's Center Assessment Tool, updated 11/10/22 showed the following, regarding staff training and ongoing education requirements: -All new employees will receive ongoing education at the time of hire and as necessary; -All team members will receive annual education; -CNAs are required to have 12 hours of education annually; -Education can be added at any time due to the needs of the Center and/or residents. 2. Review of the facility's Certified Nurse Aide Training worksheets for CNA V showed: -A hire date of 1/31/20; -Nine hours of ongoing clinical education completed from 1/31/22 to 1/31/23. -No other staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-10-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing numbers to provide consistent resident care for activities of daily living (ADL)s and restorative therapy (RT). This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The census was 65. During an interview on 10/29/20 at 11:09 A.M., Certified Nurse Aides (CNA)s M and BB said they feel like the facility is always short staffed. There are usually four CNAs on the day shift and that is not enough. CNA BB said yesterday he/she was assigned four showers and he/she only had time to complete two of them. Today he/she was assigned three showers and may only have time to complete two but had not had time yet to complete even one. During the survey process, the survey team identified ADL (showers, shaving and grooming) and RT programs (exercises for range of motion to joints and assistance with walking) were not being completed as scheduled. During an interview on 10/30/20 at 10:30 A.M., the Director of Nursing said the amount of staff they can schedule is set by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents with dignity by leaving one resident (Resident #190) laying on a Hoyer sling (large piece of material that cradles the resident during transfer) for at least two hours after the resident requested to be transferred from the bed into a chair. The facility also failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #236's) colostomy bag (a small waterproof pouch to collect waste from the body) was clean. The resident sat in his/her room with towels underneath the colostomy bag as he/she waited for staff to clean it. The facility also left two residents (Resident #22 and Resident #18) exposed in their personal bedrooms in stages of undress while staff and other residents walked past their rooms. This deficient practice affected four of 16 sampled residents. The census was 65. 1. Review of Resident #190's facility face sheet, showed the following: -admitted on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, stroke,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-30 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable accounting principles by allowing a resident's account to have a negative balance (Resident #303) and not having updated and accurate authorization forms for approximately 45 residents whose funds the facility held. The census was 65. 1. Review of Resident #303's resident trust account, showed the following: -Expired [DATE]; -Balance on [DATE], zero; -Balance on [DATE], -$858.00; -Balance on [DATE], -$858.00; -Balance on [DATE], -$50.00; -Balance on [DATE], -$50.00; -Balance on [DATE], $500.26; -Balance on [DATE], $0.00. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:10 P.M., the business office manager/dietary manager (BOM/DM) said the resident was admitted , and he/she expired soon after admission. She received the check and deposited it in the bank and then it was withdrawn. She wrote to Supplemental Security Income (SSI), and they were waiting for SSI to reimburse the facility. They (SSI) said they were back logged, and that was why the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-30 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure third party liability (TPL) forms were completed for the final accounting for residents who expired, within 30 days. This affected four residents who expired and had money in their account (Resident's #301, #302, #303 and #304). The census was 65. 1. Review of Resident #301's resident fund account, showed the following: -He/she expired on [DATE]; -He/she had a balance of $395.12; -TPL completed [DATE]. 2. Review of Resident #302's resident fund account, showed the following: -He/she expired on [DATE]; -He/she had a balance of $2630.83; -TPL completed [DATE]. 3. Review of Resident #303's resident fund account, showed the following: -He/she expired on [DATE]; -He/she had a balance of $500.27; -TPL completed [DATE]. 4. Review of Resident #304's resident fund account, showed the following: -He/she expired on [DATE]; -He/she had a balance of $2781.23; -TPL completed [DATE]. 5. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:38 A.M., the business office…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-30 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they maintained an adequate bond in the amount of one and one-half times the average monthly balance for the past 12 months. The census was 65. Review of the resident trust account, showed the following: -From October 2019 to September 2020, the average monthly balance was $35,043.77. This would require a bond in the amount of $52,500; -Review of the Department of Health and Senior Services data base for approved bonds, showed the facility had a bond in the amount of $50,000; -Review of the resident current balance report for October 2020, showed an amount of $33,967.35 in the trust account. During an interview on 10/27/20 at 1:12 P.M., the administrator said the corporate office over sees the bond amount to make sure it is sufficient.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment and equipment was maintained to be in good repair, when the front door alarm went off repeatedly. Furthermore, the facility failed to prevent the potential misappropriation of property for eight of 16 sampled residents, two expanded sample residents and one closed sample resident. (Residents #137, #15, #27, #32, #24, #19, #34, #136, #140, #190 and #192) when facility staff did not complete an admitting and discharge personal inventory form or ensure their accuracy, or follow their policy for investigating lost items. The facility census was 65. 1. Observations of the front door alarms, showed the alarm sounded loudly at the following times: -10/23/20 at 5:31 A.M., 6:46 A.M., 7:16 A.M., 8:25 A.M., 9:25 A.M., 9:39 A.M., 10:50 A.M., 10:59 A.M., 11:04 A.M., 11:07 A.M., 11:32 A.M., and 12:15 P.M.; -10/26/20 at 7:30 A.M., 7:31 A.M., 7:42 A.M., and 9:22 A.M.; -10/28/20 at 12:25 P.M., 12:32 P.M., and 12:33 P.M.;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure newly hired employees were screened to rule out the presence of a Federal Indicator with the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Registry for eight of ten sampled employees hired since the last survey. The census was 65. According to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS), Section for Long Term Care LTC Bulletin Volume 6, winter of 2008, showed providers are required to check the registry before hiring any individual and may not continue to employ a person whose name appears on the registry with a federal indicator. Providers must seek verification from all states believed to have information on the individual. Review of the facility's undated Onboarding a New Hire policy, showed the following: -It is the facility's policy to abide by federal and state regulations and guidelines when hiring an employee within a skilled nursing facility; -Employment is contingent upon regulatory compliance requirement regarding criminal history and qualifications listings from state and federal entities pertaining to work with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement person centered comprehensive care plans to accurately reflect individual care needs for one resident requiring topical ointment due to his/her skin 90% covered in burns, who was unable to use a push-button call light, and had preferences to be out of bed and to smoke cigarettes (Resident #23), one resident requiring catheter care (Resident #32) and another resident with recent weight loss (Resident #7). The sample size was 16. The census was 65. 1. Review of Resident #23's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/3/20, showed the following: -admitted [DATE]; -Cognitively intact; -Rejection of care not exhibited; -Total dependence of two (+) person physical assistance required for bed mobility and transfers; -Total dependence of one person physical assistance required for dressing and personal hygiene; -Upper and lower extremities impaired on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice when staff failed to obtain parameters of when to notify the physician due to high or low blood glucose levels for one resident and failed to follow the physician's order to notify the physician when one resident's blood glucose levels exceeded the ordered parameters. The facility identified 14 residents with orders to obtain blood glucose levels. Of those 15, four were sampled and four were selected from an expanded sample. Problems were identified with two of the four residents from the expanded sample. (Residents #1 and #88). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure all physician orders were followed when staff failed to administer wound treatment for one resident with a diabetic ulcer (Resident #187), and to administer treatments for two residents with skin integrity issues (Residents #23 and #21). In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff completed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents that require assistance with activities of daily living received that assistance with showers, nail care and facial care as scheduled. Problems were identified with 13 of the 16 sampled residents (Residents #10, #24, #32, #34, #7, #11, #19, #23, #27, #31, #186, #190 and #192). In addition, one resident did not receive appropriate perineal care during an observation of perineal care. (Resident #22). The census was 65. 1. Review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/4/20, showed the following: -admission date of 7/28/20; -Understood/understands; -BIMS score of 12 (a score of 8-12 indicates moderately impaired cognition); -Extensive assistance of two (+) persons required for bed mobility; -Total dependence of two (+) persons required for transfers; -Extensive assistance of one person required for locomotion on/off the unit, dressing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services were provided to residents to prevent the development of pressure ulcers and treat those residents with pressure ulcers. Facility staff failed to consistently ensure pressure ulcer treatments were completed as ordered and per acceptable nursing standards and failed to thoroughly assess residents' skin and obtain orders for new wounds. One resident was chosen as a closed record and problems were identified (Resident #38). The facility identified five residents with pressure ulcers. Of those five, one was sampled (Resident #24) and one was discovered during the survey (Resident #19). The sample size was 16. The census was 65. Review of the facility Skin Program Policy and Procedure, dated 5/28/19, showed the following: Purpose: -The purpose of the skin program is to ensure that every resident's skin condition is assessed on admission and a comprehensive and interdisciplinary care plan is developed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received restorative therapy services as needed either due to contractures or limited range of motion. The facility identified 19 residents admitted with contractures and 15 residents that received restorative nursing services. Of those 15, four were part of the survey sample and two were selected as an expanded sample. Problems were identified with all six residents. (Residents #140, #141, #24, #16, #186 and #19). The census was 65. 1. Review of Resident #140's medical record, showed the following: -admission date of 11/25/19; -Diagnoses included diabetes, asthma, sleep apnea (a potentially serious sleep disorder in which breathing repeatedly stops and starts), chronic respiratory failure (a condition that results in the inability to effectively exchange carbon dioxide and oxygen, and induces chronically low oxygen levels or chronically high carbon dioxide levels), sarcoidosis of the lungs (small lumps of inflammatory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the faility failed to follow their smoking policy for residents that smoke. Residents were observed with their own lighters and smoking unsupervised. The facility identified 15 residents that smoke. Of those 15, two were sampled and three were selected for an expanded sample and problems were identified with all five. One of those five residents had a history of falls and the facility failed to follow their falls program policy by failing to complete the required post fall documentation and assessments. (Residents #130, #9, #19, #87, and #236). In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff followed their policy and safety guidelines while transferring residents with mechanical lifts. Three residents were observed being transferred, two that required a hoyer lift and one that required a sit to stand lift. Problems were identified during all three transfers. Also,the facility failed to ensure residents had physician orders for medications to be kept at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-30 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their Bed Rail policy for residents using bed rails, by not having physician orders or assessments for use or safety. The facility identified six residents that used bed rails. Of those six, one was sampled (Resident #18) and two were selected as expanded sample (Residents #23 and #39) and problems were identified with all three. The census was 65. Review of the facility Bed Rail policy, dated 11/27/19, showed: -The facility will attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side rail or bed rail. If a bed/side rail is used the facility will verify correct installation, use, and maintenance of bed rails; -Protocols: 1) Assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation; 2) Review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation; 3) Ensure that the bed's dimensions are appropriate for the resident's size and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care and are able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs when a nurse provided care outside of his/her scope of practice for one resident (Resident #192) by administering intravenous (IV) antibiotics without proper certification. The facility failed to ensure staff had the competent skills to properly assess a resident receiving dialysis services (process for removal of waste and excess water from the blood due to kidney failure) for one resident (Resident #21). In addition, the facility failed to ensure all staff, including agency staff, were adequately trained and informed of facility policies and expectations per acceptable nursing standards. The census was 65. 1. Review of Resident #192's facility face…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and properly document narcotic counts for controlled substances on two of two medication carts. The census was 65. 1. Review of the narcotic count sheet, dated 9/1 through 9/30/20, for resident halls 100, 500 and the back half of 400, showed the following: -No documentation of the total number of narcotic cards on 20 shifts; -No signature by the on-coming nurse on 27 shifts; -No signature by the off-going nurse on 26 shifts. 2. Review of the narcotic count sheet, dated 10/1 through 10/25/20, for resident halls 100, 500 and the back half of 400, showed the following: -No documentation of the total number of narcotic cards on 33 shifts; -No signature by the on-coming nurse on 22 shifts; -No signature by the off-going nurse on 38 shifts. 3. Review of the narcotic count sheet, dated 9/1 through 9/30/20, for halls 200,300 and the front half of 400, showed the following: -No documentation of the total number of narcotic cards on 23 shifts; -No signature by the on-coming nurse on 29 shifts; -No signature by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 28 opportunities for error, four errors occurred resulting in a 14.29 % medication error rate (Residents #192, #35 and #140). The census was 65. 1. Review of Resident #192's facility face sheet, showed the following: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, stroke and cerebral aneurysm-unruptured (a bulge or ballooning of a blood vessel in the brain). Review of the physician's order sheet (POS), showed an order, dated 10/20/20, to administer intravenous (IV) Vancomycin (antibiotic) 200 milliliters (ml) every 12 hours. Review of the medication administration record (MAR), showed scheduled administration times for Vancomycin as 8:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M. Observation on 10/23/20 at 6:13 A.M., showed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) L hung Vancomycin one gram (g) in 250 ml of normal saline (NS). He/she set the IV pump to infuse the medication over 60…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to label, date and properly store opened food items in the freezer during four of seven days of observation. This deficient practice affected all residents who ate at the facility. The census was 65. Observation of the freezer on 10/22/20 at 8:24 A.M., showed the following unlabeled and undated food items: -Approximately four bags of unidentified food substances, opened, white in color and freezer burned; -One bag of what appeared to be bread sticks, opened and freezer burned; -Three bags of a square shaped patty, opened and freezer burned; -Two bags of an unidentified food substance, brown in color, opened and freezer burned. Observation of the freezer on 10/23/20 at 5:54 A.M., showed the following unlabeled and undated food items: -Two bags of what appeared to be pork riblets, opened and freezer burned; -One bag of what appeared to be white chopped meat, opened and freezer burned; -One bag of what appeared to be bread sticks, opened and freezer burned; -Approximately four bags of unidentified food substances, opened and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and readily accessible in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. The sample was 16 and issues were found with seven resident records reviewed (Residents #27, #34, #186, #140, #19, #24 and #31) and two additional sampled residents (Residents #137 and #15). This had the potential to affect residents if the electronic medical records (EMR) were not available. The census was 65. 1. Review of Resident #27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 9/4/20, showed: -admission date of 5/20/20; -Diagnoses included pneumonia, Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Review of the hard (paper) chart, showed no printed physician's orders sheets (POS) available. 2. Review of Resident #34's admission MDS, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed acceptable infection control practices during care. One staff member was observed laying clean towels in a dirty sink, then using the towels to clean one resident (Resident #18). In addition, staff failed to wash their hands prior to and after providing perineal care (washing the genitalia and buttocks) and assessing a pressure ulcer (Residents #198 and #32). The facility also failed to adhere to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). The facility failed to test a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) before returning to work after an illness and failed to ensure staff washed their hands and wore gloves prior to touching pills or when staff did not wash their hands or change gloves after touching their face or contaminated surface. The facility failed to screen staff and visitors appropriately upon entering the facility or during their shift. Staff also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-30 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their Bed Rail policy by not checking bed rails monthly by maintenance to verify they are secured and installed properly to the resident's bed frame. The facility identified six residents that used bed rails. Of those six, one was sampled (Resident #18) and two were selected as expanded sample (Residents #23 and #39) and problems were identified with all three. The census was 65. Review of the facility Bed Rails policy, dated 11/27/19, showed: -The facility will attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side rail or bed rail. If a bed/side rail is used the facility will verify correct installation, use, and maintenance of bed rails; -Protocols: 1) Assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation; 3) Ensure that the bed's dimensions are appropriate for the resident's size and weight; 4) Follow the manufacturers' recommendations and specifications for installing and maintaining bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of individual needs and preferences by failing to ensure a resident with hemiplegia (paralysis to one side) had a call system they were able to use and within their reach (Resident #23). The sample size was 16. The census was 65. Review of Resident #23's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/3/20, showed: -admitted [DATE]; -Cognitively intact; -Total dependence of one or two person physical assist required for bed mobility, transfers, eating, dressing, and personal hygiene; -Upper and lower extremities impaired on both sides; -Diagnoses include dementia, hemiplegia or hemiparesis, depression, and burns involving 90% or more of body surface with 90% or more of third degree burns. Review of the resident's care plan, revised 10/5/20, and in use during the survey, showed: -Focus: Resident has an activities of daily living (ADL, self…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-10-30 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolated
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to enforce restrictions placed on one employee by the state Board of Nursing. The employee was not allowed to work without supervision, and the facility failed to ensure this happened for six out of seven shifts reviewed. The census was 65. Review of Nurse N's employee file, showed the following: -A finding by the Missouri State Board of Nursing, dated 6/12/19, showed: -Employment Restrictions (two years) included: Respondent (Nurse N) shall only work as a nurse where there is on-site supervision by someone with the authority to send Respondent home. Respondent shall not work in home healthcare, hospice or durable medical equipment; -An application, dated 10/8/20, showed: -Position applied for: Registered Nurse; -Have you been charged/convicted of a felony and/or misdemeanor/or served time? Yes; -If yes, please describe: Simple assault in 2016; -Date of hire: 10/14/20. Review of the shifts worked by Nurse N from 10/20/20 through 10/25/20, showed the following: -On 10/20/20, Nurse N worked the evening shift without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove an indwelling catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) as ordered, failed to obtain complete physician orders for indwelling urinary catheters, and failed to maintain proper placement of catheter tubing and drainage bags. The facility identified four residents as having indwelling and/or supra pubic urinary catheters (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder through the abdominal wall to drain urine). Of those four, three were chosen for the sample and problems were found with two residents (Residents #34 and #32). The sample size was 16. The census was 65. 1. Review of Resident #34's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 10/2/20, showed the following: -An admission date of 9/25/20; -Cognitively intact; -Required limited staff assistance for transfers and dressing. Required total assistance from staff for toileting; -Bowel and bladder:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement approaches for weight loss by failing to consistently provide nutritional supplements and feeding assistance for one resident identified with severe weight loss (unplanned loss greater than 5% of body weight in one month, greater than 7.5% in three months, or greater than 10% in six months) (Resident #7). The sample size was 16. The census was 65. Review of Resident #7's medical record, showed the following: -admitted [DATE]; -On 6/8/20, weight of 129.0 pounds (lbs.); -July 2020 weight not documented; -admitted to hospice on 7/9/20, due to stroke; -A physician order, dated 7/15/20, for med pass (nutritional supplement) three times a day, and feeding assistance; -Diagnoses included abnormal weight loss, dementia, and dysphagia (swallowing disorder) following stroke. Review of the resident's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/23/20, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-10-30 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the facility's policy regarding the administration of medications through a gastronomy tube (g-tube, a small rubber tube surgically inserted through the abdomen in to the stomach to administer nutrition, fluids and medications) by administering one resident's morning medications together instead of individually (Resident #192). The sample size was 16. The facility census was 65. Review of Resident #192's facility face sheet, showed the following: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, stroke and cerebral aneurysm-unruptured (a bulge or ballooning of a blood vessel in the brain). Observation on 10/23/20 at 11:00 A.M., showed Registered Nurse (RN) N entered the resident's room with a 90 milliliter (ml) plastic cup, and the lower portion filled with crushed medications. RN N added approximately 30 ml of water to the cup of crushed medications. He/she checked placement of the g-tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-10-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act upon irregularities identified by a licensed pharmacist's medication regimen reviews (MRR), and to document the physician's response to irregularities noted, for four of 16 sampled residents (Residents #23, #7, #11, and #18). The census was 65. 1. Review of Resident #23's electronic medical record (EMR), showed the following: -admitted on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, squamous blepharitis (chronic inflammation of the eyelid border), abnormal weight loss, depression, high blood pressure, epilepsy (seizure disorder), and burns involving 90% or more of body surface with 90% more of third degree burns; -A progress note, dated 7/10/20, showed pharmacy review complete. Nursing request; -No documentation specifying the pharmacist's recommendation from 7/10/20; -A progress note, dated 8/7/20, showed pharmacy review complete. Physician request; -No documentation specifying the pharmacist's recommendation from 8/7/20, or the physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-10-27 · tag F0575 — widespread
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the name, address, and telephone number for the State Survey Agency, and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency concerning any suspected violation of state or federal nursing facility regulation, including but not limited to resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. The census was 66. Observations throughout the survey from 10/23/23 through 10/27/23, showed no contact information for the State Survey Agency posted in the facility. During a Resident Council meeting on 10/24/23 at 2:00 P.M., six out of seven residents, whom the facility identified as alert and oriented, said they did not know where contact information for the State Survey Agency was located. They did not know how to report a complaint to the State Survey Agency. During an interview on 10/27/23 at 9:39 A.M., the Administrator said the Social Worker is responsible for posting the State Survey Agency contact information for the residents. She expected residents to have access to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2020-10-30 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough facility assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for residents competently during both day to day operations, as well as during emergencies, by not addressing the use of, and need for, agency staff. This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 65. 1. Review of the Facility Assessment, last reviewed on 10/22/20, showed the following: -Average daily census: 60-75 residents; -Assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs, self care activities): -Dressing: 50 residents required assist of 1-2 staff, 5 residents dependent on staff; -Bathing: 48 residents required assist of 1-2 staff, 13 residents dependent on staff; -Transfers: 37 residents required assist of 1-2 staff, 16 residents dependent on staff; -Eating: 3 residents required assist of 1-2 staff, 8 residents dependent on staff; -Toileting: 24 residents required assist of 1-2 staff, 27 residents dependent on staff; -Type of staff members, other healthcare professionals, and medical practitioners that are needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2020-10-30 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a plan that identified and corrected quality deficiencies as well as opportunities for improvement, which would lead to improvement in the lives of the nursing home residents, through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety, by not informing their medical director of ongoing resident care issues. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents living in the facility. The census was 65. Throughout the survey process from 10/22/20 through 10/23/20 and 10/26/20 through 10/30/20, the survey team identified activities of daily living (ADLs, self care such as showers, shaving and grooming) and the restorative treatment (RT) programs (exercises for range of motion to joints and assistance with walking) were not being completed as scheduled. During an interview on 10/30/20 at 10:30 A.M., the Director of Nursing said the amount of staff they can schedule is set by the corporation. It does not always take into account the acuity level of each resident. They usually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$13,042 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $13,042 — penalty dated 2023-09-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BLUE CIRCLE HOLDING LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2019
BRECHER, MENDELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER60%since 04/01/2019
LICHTMAN, CHANAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST18%since 04/01/2018
ZIMMERMAN, JACOBIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST17%since 04/01/2019
ZWEIG, PINCHESIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 04/01/2019
SERVISFIRST BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 04/01/2019
ALLEN, ROBINIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$354K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 4%Other / private 19%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $354K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$239per resident / day
operating cost
$7,257per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$215per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265817. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next