Estates Of St Louis, Llc, The
2115 Kappel Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63136 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 94 certified beds · (314) 867-7474 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0569, F0570)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $66,640 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-12)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.2% | 18.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.9% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.6% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 42.8% | 18.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.8% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.1% | 25.6% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.5% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.3% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.1% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 30.0% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.70 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.38 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 76.3 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.49 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.15 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.70 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
60 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse and failed to follow its policies to prevent resident-to-resident abuse when staff failed to consistently monitor Resident #1 during 15-minute face checks as an intervention for wandering. This contributed to three known resident-to-resident altercations, and had the potential to effect the safety and privacy of all other residents on the secured unit. (Residents #2, #3 and #4). The census was 78. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy, revised 4/8/24, showed: -Policy: Each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. The resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, and misappropriation of property. Resident must not be subject to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies servicing the resident,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse was not violated, when one resident was abused by other resident resulting in a head laceration (Resident #4 and #5). The facility census was 81. The Administrator was notified on 2/26/24 of the past non-compliance. The facility immediately began an investigation into the incident, separated and assessed the residents, as well as contacted all responsible parties and physicians, and sent the residents out for evaluations following the altercation. Upon the residents' return to the facility, the facility had interventions in place to ensure no further altercations would take place, which included: Medication adjustments (while at the hospital), room changes, and care plan meeting scheduled. In addition, monthly abuse and neglect in-servicing had been completed with staff, which included resident to resident abuse. The noncompliance was corrected on 2/10/24. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) as required within a two-hour timeframe following a physical altercation between two residents (Residents #3 and #4), in which one resident sustained an eye injury. The sample was four. The census was 73. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) as required within a two-hour timeframe following a physical altercation between two residents (Residents #3 and #4), in which one resident sustained an eye injury. The sample was four. The census was 73. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy, dated 4/8/24, showed the following:-Policy: Each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. The resident has the right to be free from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were placed in an account separate from the facility operating account. The facility did not provide residents with refunds of their personal funds from the operating account in a timely manner for nine residents (Resident #7, #8, #9, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16 and #17). Facility staff failed to provide the Social Security and/or Medicaid monthly allowance in a timely manner, which did not allow the resident/financial guardian the right to manage his/her financial affairs for three residents (Resident #3, #7 and #8) out of a sample of seven. The facility census was 79.1. Record review of the facility-maintained Accounts Receivable Aging Report, dated 12/16/25, showed the following residents with personal funds held in the facility operating account. Resident - Amount Held in Operating Account#7 - $724.75#8 - $1,533.00#9 - $2,096.00#12 - $636.00#13 - $1,327.00#14 - $4,241.67#15 - $1,325.85#16 - $3,310.00#17 - $3,871.10Total - $19,065.37 Record review of the facility-maintained paperwork showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services per acceptable standards of practice for one resident (Resident #1), when the facility failed to provide follow-up care and treatment by not completing a clinical referral for a resident with a diagnosis of chronic hepatitis C infection (viral infection that causes liver swelling that can lead to serious liver damage, liver failure and liver cancer). The sample size was 3. The census was 82.Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, showed hepatitis C treatment plans typically consisted of 8-12 weeks of oral direct-acting antiviral (DAA) medications. This short course of well-tolerated medication could cure more than 95% of cases and was recommended for virtually everyone diagnosed with hepatitis C. Treatment is crucial to reduce the risk of developing chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, and liver cancer. In July 2023 the CDC recommended automatic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's right to be informed in advance of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he/she preferred when staff did not inform the resident's representative prior to the resident having lung surgery (Resident #1). The sample was 4. The census was 80. Review of facility's Change in a Resident's Condition or Status policy, revised 8-24-24, showed: -The facility will assess and identify a change in condition to ensure the resident receives appropriate care; -Procedure: -The nurse supervisor/charge nurse will notify the resident's family or representative when: -There is a significant change in the resident's condition; -It is necessary to transfer the resident to a hospital; -Except in medical emergencies, notifications will be made within 24 hours of a change occurring in the resident's medical/mental condition or status; -The nursing supervisor/charge nurse will document of changes in the resident's medical record, updating of resident and, family of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
See event ID KU8L12 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive proper treatment to maintain vision when staff failed to reschedule transportation arrangements for one sampled resident (Resident #500) out of 13 sampled residents, who had an eye appointment and was recommended to have retina surgery then cataract surgery. The resident missed the appointment when transportation did not show up and staff failed to reschedule the appointment after it was missed. The facility also failed to follow-up with the resident's routine eye appointment. The census was 77. During an interview on 2/7/25 at 12:50 P.M., the transportation policy was requested. The Administrator said there is no policy. There is just a protocol that staff follow. Review of Resident #500's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 1/9/25, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Vision: Adequate-Sees fine detail, including regular print in newspaper/books; -Diagnoses included diabetes, dementia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
See event ID KU8L12 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dental care and services were provided to one sampled resident who requested dental services (Resident #500) out of 13 sampled residents. The census was 77. During an interview on 2/7/25 at 12:50 P.M., the transportation policy was requested. The Administrator said there is no policy. There is just a protocol that staff follow. Review of Resident #500's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff dated 1/9/25, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -No dental issues present; -Diagnoses include diabetes, dementia, schizophrenia, and anxiety. Review of the resident's provided dental assessments, showed: -Oral assessment, 5/8/24, no natural teeth or tooth fragments (edentulous): Fully edentulous, no appliances. No pain, resident is interested in getting full dentures if he/she is eligible. Stated he/she has never had them before and he/she currently sticks to softer foods; -Oral assessment, 6/5/24, no natural teeth or tooth fragments…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure floors were clean, baking pans and pots were free of carbon build-up, one of one freezer had debris and food on the floor, one of one refrigerator had food and debris on the floor, and 30 of 30 water bottles were expired and two of 30 gallons of water had mouse droppings on them. This failure had the potential to affect all 75 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: Review of the policy and procedure titled Receiving and Storage of Food dated 12/06/24 revealed, .(8) keep storage areas clean and dry (9) all freezer and refrigeration units must be kept clean and free of food debris. Review of the undated policy titled Cleaning Schedule revealed it is the responsibility of the Dietary Manager to enforce the cleaning schedules and to monitor the completion of assigned cleaning tasks. During an observation on 12/16/24 at 8:46 AM, the following was observed: The kitchen floor was sticky when walked on it and the floor had debris including dust, paper, and food particles on it in the prep area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their tuberculosis (TB, a potentially serious infectious bacterial disease that mainly affects the lungs) policy when staff failed to complete a two step and the annual one step of the employee TB screening tests in a timely manner for a total of 10 employees. The facility also failed to implement their water management plan in order to potentially identify where bacterium Legionella and other waterborne pathogens could grow. The census was 78. Review of the facility's TB Employee Testing Policy, dated 8/25/24, showed the following: -Policy: -In order to minimize the risk of resident acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from tuberculosis, it's the policy of this facility to screen our employees upon hire and annually; -Procedure for Screening: -1. Upon hire, each new employee will have a 2 step TB test administered and read per protocol. -2. Annually, each employee will be screened for TB, and the Director of Nursing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that dietary and eight of eight sampled resident's (Resident R) 30, R36, R62, R25, R46, R12, R73, and R56) room were free of pest. Specifically, live mice and mouse droppings were observed in dietary and residents reported mice in their room. This failure had the potential for residents to have food prepared in an unsanitary manner and had the potential to expose residents to diseases caused by being exposed to rodents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Pest Control Policy dated 08/24/24 revealed, this facility will ensure facility remains clean and free from pests and .(2) monthly contracted pest control company will treat inside and outside of facility. 1. During an observation on 12/16/24 at 8:46 AM, one live mouse and mouse droppings were observed in a plastic container in the dry storage pantry of the facility's kitchen. During an interview on 12/16/24 at 8:56 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure newly hired employees were screened to rule out the presence of a Federal Indicator, with the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Registry for two staff members. A sample of 10 employees hired were reviewed. The facility hired at least 45 new employees since the last survey. The census was 78. Review of the facility Abuse and Neglect Policy, undated, showed the following: -Policy: -Each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. The resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect and misappropriation of property. Resident must not be subject to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to; facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members, legal guardians, friends or other individuals. -Employee Screening: -Background, reference and credentials' checks should be conducted on employees prior to or at the time of employment, by facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 48 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-23 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure six of six residents (Resident (R) 9, R13, R17, R28, R78, and R129) and their representatives reviewed for facility initiated emergent hospital transfer from a total sample of 24 were provided with written transfer/discharge notice that stated the reason for transfer, the place of transfer, and other information regarding the transfer. This failure had the potential to affect the residents and their Resident Representative (RR) by not having the knowledge of where and why a resident was transferred, and/or how to appeal the transfer, if desired. Additionally, the Ombudsman was not notified of hospital transfers for three of six residents (R9, R13, R17). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Admission, Transfer and Discharge Policy revised 08/24/24 indicated .The facility may transfer or discharge the resident in compliance with facility standards, and are as follows, but not limited to: 1. The resident's welfare…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-23 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure six of six residents (Resident (R) 9, R13, R17, R28, R78, and R129) out of a sample of 24 residents who were reviewed for hospitalization were provided with a bed hold notice within 24 hours of emergent transfer to the hospital to include bed reserve payment. This failure increased the potential that residents would not know to request a bed hold and may be unable to return to the facility. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Bed Hold Policy indicated, .This notification shall be given on admission to the facility, at the time of transfer to the hospital .Medicare does not pay for any type of bed hold. If the resident is discharged to the hospital, or goes out of the facility for over-night leave of absence, the bed may be held by paying the current room rate for the bed being served . 1.Review of R9's admission Record located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews the facility failed to ensure that all Interdisciplinary Team Members (IDT) were participated in quarterly care conferences for 12 of 24 sampled residents (Resident (R) 9, R12, R13, R17, R25, R29, R32, R34, R36, R40, R57, and R73). This failure had the potential for the residents to have unmet care needs. Findings include: Review of the facility policy revised 08/24/24 stated, A care plan shall be used in developing the resident's daily care routine .Every quarter, an attempt will be made to schedule a care plan conference with the resident, family and/or responsible party to allow the staff to provide the best person-centered care .Care plan meetings will be held quarterly with the interdisciplinary team, resident and responsible party or guardian .A care plan conference will include the interdisciplinary team as applicable. Attendees will sign the care plan conference sign in sheet . 1.Review of R9's undated admission Record located in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-23 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to correctly issue Medicare Part A beneficiaries CMS-10055 (Skilled Nursing Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) when resident completed therapy or skilled nursing services for two of three residents (Resident (R) 9 and R68) reviewed for beneficiary notices. This failure had the potential of a resident or responsible party to not make an informed decision related to continuing to receive Medicare A services, by having the facility continue services and bill Medicare A, continue the services, and bill the resident, or not receive the services. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled ABN / NOMNC Policy provided by the facility stated, Skilled nursing facilities must deliver a completed copy of the Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (ABN) and Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to beneficiaries/enrollees receiving covered skilled nursing services. The ABN/NOMNC must be delivered at least 2 calendar days…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances were resolved in a timely manner for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident (R) 23). This failure has the potential to affect the current residents and/or their family members by not having grievances resolved in a timely manner. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Grievance Policy and Procedure dated 06/15/24 indicated our facility investigates all grievances and complaints filed within the facility in a timely manner .(3) if a grievance is pertaining to an alleged violation of resident rights, as necessary, the Administrator must be notified, by the Social Service Worker, so that immediate action can be taken to prevent further potential violations of any resident right. Review of the admission Packet provided by the facility indicated our facility investigates all grievances and complaints filed within the facility in a timely manner. The Administrator has assigned the responsibility of investigating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility's policy, the facility failed to timely report a resident to resident alleged physical altercation to the State Agency (SA) involving two residents (Resident (R)13 and R17) of 16 residents reviewed for reporting alleged allegations of abuse. This had the potential for continued resident to resident altercations for the two residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy revised 04/08/24 revealed, .1. The Abuse Coordinator in the facility is the Administrator or facility appointed designee. Report allegation or suspected abuse, neglect or exploitation immediately to the Administrator, Other officials in accordance with State Law (this includes law enforcement officials), and State Survey and Certification agency through established procedures. 1.Review of R13's undated admission Record located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Resident tab indicated the resident was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for and resident to resident alleged altercation for two residents (Resident (R) R13 and R17) out of 16 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. This failure had the potential to place the residents to future potential altercations. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy provided by the facility and revised on 04/08/24 stated, .When suspicion of abuse .occur, it must be communicated to the facility's Administrator, Department Head, or Supervisor and the Administrator and/or designee must initiate an investigation Components of the investigation may include: .Interview all witnesses separately. Include roommates, residents in adjoining rooms, staff members in the area and any noted visitors in the area. Obtain witness statements, according to appropriate policies. All statements should be signed and dated by the person making the statement. Document the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-23 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that four (Residents (R)9, R19, R32, and R37) out of 24 sampled residents had an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Failure to code the MDS correctly could potentially lead to inaccurate federal reimbursements and inaccurate assessment and care planning of the resident. Findings include: Review of the undated policy titled MDS (Minimum Data Set) provided by the facility stated .The RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Manual serves as the policy by which the facility follows the process of completing MDS assessments. 1.Review of R9's undated admission Record located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab indicated she was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of heart failure. Review of R9's MDS located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/13/24 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of not assessed. R9 was coded as not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive proper treatment to maintain vision when staff failed to reschedule transportation arrangements for one sampled resident (Resident #500) out of 13 sampled residents, who had an eye appointment and was recommended to have retina surgery then cataract surgery. The resident missed the appointment when transportation did not show up and staff failed to reschedule the appointment after it was missed. The facility also failed to follow-up with the resident's routine eye appointment. The census was 77. During an interview on 2/7/25 at 12:50 P.M., the transportation policy was requested. The Administrator said there is no policy. There is just a protocol that staff follow. Review of Resident #500's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 1/9/25, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Vision: Adequate-Sees fine detail, including regular print in newspaper/books; -Diagnoses included diabetes, dementia, schizophrenia, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one of 39 residents (Resident (R)13) reviewed for smoking wore a smoking apron while smoking. This failure placed R13 at risk for injury. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Smoking Policy last reviewed on 10/12/24 revealed .Residents who are identified as 'supervised smokers' will be monitored by facility staff. If a resident identifies as a supervised smoker who requires smoking assistance (i.e., smoking aprons .) will be addressed and care planned for preventative measures to ensure residents safety . Review of R13's undated admission Record located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Resident tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of dementia. Review of R13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) under the MDS tab in the EMR had an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/16/24 indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide oxygen services that included cleaning of the oxygen concentrator for one of one residents (Resident (R)13) reviewed for oxygen therapy. This failure had the potential for the concentrator to not remove all contaminated air and provide adequate oxygenation to the resident. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Supply Policy revised 07/15/24 stated This facility will maintain oxygen device supplies in a clean status, ensuring proper labeling and replacement of supplies as needed/per physician's orders . Review of R13's undated admission Record located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Resident tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of dementia. Review of R13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) under the MDS tab in the EMR had an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/16/24 indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness of two of the two medication rooms. The failure has the potential to contribute to the pest infestation. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure medication refrigerator temperature logs were maintained in two of the two medication rooms. Also, the facility failed to ensure that expired medications and syringes were removed from the medication cart. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled, Storage and Labeling of Medication, with a revision date of 01/01/24, guides the staff as follows: Orally administered medications are kept separate from externally used medications and treatments such as suppositories, ointments, creams, vaginal products, etc. Eye medications are stored separately per facility policy Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are correct, soiled, or without secure closures, or immediately removed from the inventory, disposed of in accordance to the procedure for medication disposal, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dental care and services were provided to one sampled resident who requested dental services (Resident #500) out of 13 sampled residents. The census was 77. During an interview on 2/7/25 at 12:50 P.M., the transportation policy was requested. The Administrator said there is no policy. There is just a protocol that staff follow. Review of Resident #500's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff dated 1/9/25, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -No dental issues present; -Diagnoses include diabetes, dementia, schizophrenia, and anxiety. Review of the resident's provided dental assessments, showed: -Oral assessment, 5/8/24, no natural teeth or tooth fragments (edentulous): Fully edentulous, no appliances. No pain, resident is interested in getting full dentures if he/she is eligible. Stated he/she has never had them before and he/she currently sticks to softer foods; -Oral assessment, 6/5/24, no natural teeth or tooth fragments (edentulous). Fully…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident, with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and known behaviors, attained or maintained his/her highest practicable, mental, and psychosocial well-being (Resident #1). Staff failed to provide increased behavioral monitoring and failed to update the resident's care plan with identified triggers, personalized interventions, and/or meaningful activities focused on the resident's preferences which resulted in a resident-to-resident altercation. The census was 78. Review of the facility's Supervision and Management of Residents with Behaviors policy, reviewed 1/24/24, showed: -Policy: To provide support to team members to maintain safety and security when providing care to our residents who may exhibit behaviors, while treating our residents with dignity, respect and compassion; -Protocol: -De-escalation education will be provided to team members; -The best way to manage resident behaviors is to provide care in a dignified, respectful and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff completely and accurately documented neurological checks (neuro checks, assessing mental status and level of consciousness, pupillary response, motor strength, sensation, and gait) for one resident (Resident #2). The sample was three. The census was 84. Review of the facility's Fall Policy, dated 12/1/19, showed the following: -Policy: The staff will identify any resident falls and assess resident's condition and cause of fall. Interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes will be put in place to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complication from falling; -Assess the resident for changes in level of consciousness and signs or symptoms of injury. Assess the resident immediately after the fall, then frequently throughout the shift. Assessment should continue for a minimum of 72 hours. -Notify the primary care physician (PCP) immediately after the fall and follow the physician's orders related to fall. If the resident is unconscious, has a significant injury or has a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse involving one resident (Resident #1) to law enforcement as required. The facility failed to report an allegation staff sold the resident cocaine and Fentanyl (used to treat pain, has a high risk for addiction and dependence, can cause respiratory distress and death when taken in high doses or when combined with other substances, especially alcohol or other illicit drugs such as cocaine). In addition, the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy failed to include guidance to staff on when law enforcement should be notified. The facility census was 84. Review of the facility's undated Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, showed the following: -Policy: Each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion; -The resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect and misappropriation of property; -Residents must not be subject to abuse by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-24 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a person to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services with the appropriate certification, when a consultant Registered Dietician (RD) was not employed full-time with the facility. This had the potential to affect all residents who consume meals at the facility. The census was 80. 1. Review of the facility's Director of Food Service's job requirements, showed the following: - Qualifications: Requires a High School diploma or General Educational Development (GED), Prefer a Dietetic Technician, registered by the American Dietetic Association. Or, a Certified Dietary Manager, as certified by the Dietary Manager's Association. Or, a graduate of an associate or baccalaureate degree program in foods and nutrition or food service management 2. During an interview on 8/24/23 at 10:46 A.M. the Administrator said the following: -The facility does not have a full time Registered Dietitian (RD). The contracted RD comes out to the facility at least monthly; -The Dietary Manager has been employed with the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to prevent mice, flies and gnats in common areas and resident rooms (Residents #58, #3, #40, #73, #48, and #36). The census was 80. Review of the facility's Pest Control policy, revised 3/2022, showed: -Policy: This facility will ensure facility remains clean and free from pests; -Policy explanation and compliance guidelines included; -Daily cleaning of facility will be monitored; -Monthly contracted pest control company will treat inside and outside of facility. 1. Review of the facility's contracted pest control company pest sighting log, showed: -3/27/23 exterior power spray; -4/11/23, regular service; -5/9/23, regular service; -6/6/23, regular service; -7/11/23, regular service; -8/2/23, regular service; -No documentation of specific areas treated, pest sightings, or recommendations. 2. Review of the facility's resident council meeting minutes, dated 7/25/23, showed: -Residents in attendance:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all resident personal funds in excess of $100.00 were in an interest bearing account. The facility failed to ensure resident requests for less than $100.00 ($50.00 for Medicaid residents) are honored within the same day by not providing residents access to their trust account during consistent hours and on the weekends (Residents #3, #40, #34, #49, #50, #51, #60, and #41). These deficient practices affected all the residents who had a resident trust account. The census was 80. Review of the facility's Management/Protection of Resident Funds policy, updated 1/25/23, showed: -All residents' personal funds shall be deposited in a passbook type interest bearing account and shall be subject to the terms and conditions imposed by the financial institution where such account is located; -The facility will maintain resident funds that do not exceed $50.00 in a non-interest bearing account or petty cash fund; -The facility will have posted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements to residents and/or their representatives (Residents #3, #40, #34, #51, #50, #60, #39 and #49). This deficient practice affected 61 residents whose funds were handled by the facility. The census was 80. Review of the facility's Management/Protection of Resident Funds policy, updated 1/25/23, showed: -A record of transactions regarding the resident's funds shall be maintained by the facility in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles; -The resident shall have reasonable access, upon request, to the above records and shall receive an itemized quarterly statement of his/her account. 1. Review of the facility's resident trust transaction history, showed the facility holds funds for 61 residents, including Residents #3, #40, #34, #51, #50, #60, #39 and #49. 2. Review of Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/13/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clean privacy curtains and provide bed linen for four sampled residents (Residents #15, #16, #48 and #64) and failed to ensure one resident's room was free from mouse droppings (Resident #58). The sample was 18. The census was 80. Review of the facility's Maintaining a Safe, Clean, Comfortable and Homelike Environment policy, revised 5/22/22, showed the following: -Policy: This facility will accommodate, to the extent possible, a personalized, homelike environment that recognizes the individuality and autonomy of each resident, while maintaining the safety of all residents and staff. -Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: -Minimize odors by disposing of soiled linens promptly and reporting lingering odors and bathrooms needing cleaning to the Housekeeping Department; -Report any furniture in disrepair to Maintenance promptly; -Maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment (i.e., ceiling tiles, wallpaper, floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide information to the residents on how to file a grievance or complaint. This had the potential to affect all residents at the facility. The census was 80. Review of the facility's admission Agreement, provided to residents upon admission, showed: -Residents' rights to voice grievances; -The residents may voice concerns and problems, along with recommended changes, to facility staff or outside representatives. Owners and staff of facilities are prohibited by law from retaliating if you complain. The residents should speak with the Director of Nursing or the Administrator of the facility if you encounter problems requiring immediate attention. For non-emergencies, speak to the resident council or Ombudsman; -Instructions on filing a grievance; -The facility investigates all grievances and complaints filed within the facility in a timely manner. The Administrator has assigned the responsibility of investigating grievances and complaints to the Social Service Department. Any resident, visitor, vendor, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate assistance to prevent accidents by not using a gait belt during transfers (Residents #36, #73, #58 and #31). The facility failed to document a resident's fall in the resident's progress notes (Resident #36). In addition, the facility failed to document fall prevention interventions on the resident's care plan and ensure the resident was able to reach his/her call light (Resident #59). The sample was 18. The census was 80. Review of the facility's Fall policy, reviewed 12/1/22, showed: -The staff will identify any resident fall and assess resident's condition and cause of fall; -Interventions related to the specific risks and causes will be put in place to prevent the resident from falling and try to minimize complication from falling; -Assess the resident for changes on level of consciousness and signs or symptoms of injury; -Assess the resident immediately after the fall, then frequently throughout…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. The census was 80. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment Tool, updated 7/16/23, showed: -Average daily census: 80-85; -Staff type: Identify the type of staff members, other health care professionals, and medical practitioners that are needed to provide support and care for residents; -Nursing Services: Director of Nurses (DON), Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON), Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator, Infection Control and Prevention, RN, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Certified Medication Technician (CMT), and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA); -Staffing plan: Based on the resident population and their needs for care and support, describe the general approach to staffing to ensure sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents at any given time; -Licensed Nurses (LN) providing direct care: One to two per shift; -Other nursing personnel (e.g., those with administrative duties): one for day; -The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the transmission of infections. Staff failed to follow proper hand hygiene during perineum care (peri-care, cleansing of the genitals and buttocks area) observed for three out of three residents (Residents #77, #73 and #58). Additionally, the facility failed to follow their communicable disease policy by failing to ensure newly admitted residents received the Mantoux tuberculin skin test (TST, used to test for latent tuberculosis (TB) infection) two step as required for five out of five sampled residents (Residents #31, #30, #45, #63 and #41). The census was 80. Review of the facility's Peri-Care policy, updated 6/13/23, showed: -It is the practice of this facility to provide peri-care to all incontinent residents as needed and during routine bath time in order to promote cleanliness and comfort, prevent infection to the extent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or responsible parties were notified in a timely manner when a resident's account was within the $200.00 Social Security (SSI) limit ($5,726.00) or when the resident's account was over the SSI limit. This affected two residents reviewed who received Medicaid benefits (Residents #17 and #1). The census was 80. Review of the facility's Management/Protection of Resident Funds policy, updated 1/25/23, showed: -If the resident receives Medicaid benefits, the facility shall notify the resident when the amount in his/her account has reached $200.00 less than the SSI resource limit for one person, and if the amount in the account in addition to the value of the resident's other non-exempt resources reaches the SSI resource limit for one person, the resident may lose eligibility for Medicaid or SSI. 1. Review of Resident #17's trust account, showed: -In August 2022, he/she had $10,108.45 in his/her account; -In September 2022, he/she had $10,108.45 in his/her account -In October 2022, he/she had $10,110.50 in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain privacy and confidentiality of personal and medical records for seven residents (Residents #78, #53, #63, #71, #29, #46 and #30). The census was 80. Review of the facility's Charting and Documentation policy, undated, showed: -Policy: All services provided to the resident, or any changes in the resident's medical or mental condition will be documented in the resident's medical record; -Information documented in the resident's medical record is confidential and may only be released in accordance with state law and facility policy. 1. Review of Resident #78's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/10/23, showed: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Diagnoses included dementia, depression, adjustment disorder, and schizophrenia (serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves); -Antipsychotic medication received seven out of seven…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to conduct a complete and thorough investigation of an allegation of staff to resident abuse and failed to suspend the staff accused of threatening a resident, pending an investigation in accordance with their policy. This affected one of eighteen sampled residents (Resident #15). The census was 80. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, showed the following: -Policy: Each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. The resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect and misappropriation of property. Resident must not be subject to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members, legal guardians, friends or other individuals; -Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation: When suspicion of abuse, neglect, or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice by not notifying the physician when a resident's blood sugar was elevated, when the resident refused insulin injections, and to have interventions in place for refusals of medications and treatments for one resident (Resident #15). In addition, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for blood sugar checks prior to administering Levemir (long acting insulin) to one resident (Resident #36). The sample was 18. The census was 80. Review of the facility's Refusal of Treatment policy, updated 5/25/22, showed: -Our facility shall honor a resident's request not to receive medical treatment as prescribed by his or her physician, as well as, care routines outlined on the resident's assessment and plan of care; -The resident is not forced to accept any medical treatment and may refuse specific treatment even though it is prescribed by a physician; -Treatment is defined as care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were showered routinely and in clean clothing (Residents #41 and #45) and residents received proper nail care (Residents #16 and #64). The census was 80. Review of the facility's Activities of Daily Living policy, dated 6/22/20, showed: -Purpose: Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. -Policy: Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services to ensure that their ADLs do not diminish unless the circumstances of their clinical condition demonstrate that diminishing ADLs are unavoidable. The existence of a clinical diagnosis and/or condition does not alone justify a decline in the resident's ability to perform…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their skin care policy, resulting in an untreated non-pressure wound for one sampled resident (Resident #31). The sample was 18. The census was 80. Review of the facility's Skin Care Protocol, updated on 1/12/21, showed: -Policy: To ensure that all residents' skin is monitored and assessed to be proactive in preventing skin integrity issues; -Procedure: Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA) will perform a visual assessment of a resident's skin when giving the resident a shower. Immediately report any abnormal looking skin to the charge nurse. Document findings on the Shower Sheet and turn form into the charge nurse. Charge nurse will place their signature on the Shower Sheet after assessing the resident's skin issues. Charge nurse will notify the Primary Care Physician (PCP) with changes and document any new orders and interventions. The Charge nurse will forward any problems to the Director of Nursing (DON) or designee for review. If DON or designee is on duty during any skin issues found, notify…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 35 opportunities observed, four errors occurred resulting in an 11.43% error rate (Residents # 56, #57, and #78). The census was 80. Review of the facility's Administration Medication policy, updated 1/12/21, showed: -Medications will be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed; -Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame; -Medications are to be administered within one hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified; -The individual administering the medication must check the label to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right route before giving the medication; -If a medication is withheld, refused or given at a time other than the scheduled time the individual will document the rationale; -It is best practice to document medication administration in the moment, prior to moving on to the next resident; -If a medication is missing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurately documented in accordance with acceptable professional standards of practice when staff inaccurately documented medications were administered (Residents #56, #57 and #78). The sample was 18. The census was 80. Review of the facility's Charting and Documentation policy, undated, showed: -All services provided to the resident, or any changes in the resident's medical or mental condition will be documented in the resident's medical record; -All observations, medications administered, and services performed will be documented in the resident's medical record; -All incidents, accidents, or changes in the resident's condition must be recorded; -Documentation of procedures and treatments will include care specific details at a minimum, will include: -Date and time procedure/treatment was provided; -Name and title of the individuals that provided care; -Assessment data and/or any unusual findings obtained during the procedure treatment; -How the resident tolerated the procedure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-11 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident trust account statements were accurately reconciled for 12 of 12 months reviewed. The census was 82. Review of the last 12 months of the resident trust account, showed: -January 2019, ending bank balance: $13,429.78, outstanding checks/transfers: $7,891.63, cash on hand: $625.32, adjustments: $3,020.94 (nothing to show what the adjustments were for); ending trust report balance: $9,184.41, difference $0.00. During an interview on 2/10/19 at 12:20 P.M., the business office manager (BOM) said she does not do the reconciliation, it comes from the corporate office. During an interview on 2/10/19 at 1:16 P.M., the corporate office business manager said the adjustments are made at the end of the month. If it is a negative adjustment, then it could be money that did not transfer over and the money would be put in the trust account in a couple of months. The adjustment amount that is added in, is the ending bank balance minus the outstanding checks/transfers and then cash on hand is added in. If it does not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-11 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and send a Third Party Liability (TPL) form (a form which is sent to MO Healthnet which gives an accounting of the remaining balance of that resident's funds in the resident trust account), which is required to be sent within 30 days after the death, for seven of seven residents who expired in the facility the past year and had money in their trust account (Residents #400, #401, #402, #403, #404, #405, and #406). The census was 82. Review of seven residents trust information, who expired in the past year, showed the facility did not notify the TPL unit. During an interview and record review on [DATE] at 2:15 P.M., the business office manager (BOM) provided information regarding residents who expired in the past year. The forms showed they notified Social Security Administration that the residents had expired. The facility provided no information that they notified the TPL unit of any money that remained in the resident trust. The BOM did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-02-11 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete comprehensive resident assessments using the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, within 14 calendar days after admission to the facility, upon a significant change in the resident's status, and not less than every twelve months, for six out of 46 sampled residents (Residents #154, #34, #9, #14, #202 and #204). The census was 82. 1. Review of Resident #154's medical record, showed: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -An entry MDS completed on 11/9/19; -No comprehensive MDS completed, as of 2/11/20. 2. Review of Resident #34's medical record, showed: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -A quarterly MDS completed on 9/26/19; -No entry or admission MDS completed between 6/18/19 and 9/26/19. 3. Review of Resident #9's medical record, showed: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -An annual comprehensive MDS completed on 11/14/18; -Quarterly MDSs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-02-11 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete quarterly review assessments in a timely manner, no less than once every three months, using the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, for 15 out of 46 sampled residents (Residents #102, #22, #30, #31, #34 #10, #11, #8, #38, #103, #253, #41, #37, #44 and #204). The census was 82. 1. Review of Resident #102's medical record, showed: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -An admission MDS completed on 7/23/19; -No quarterly MDS completed, as of 2/11/20. 2. Review of Resident #22's medical record, showed: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -An entry MDS completed on 8/8/19; -No quarterly MDS completed, as of 2/11/20. 3. Review of Resident #30's medical record, showed: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -An entry MDS completed on 8/21/19; -No quarterly MDS completed, as of 2/11/20. 4. Review of Resident #31's medical record, showed: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -An admission MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-02-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person centered care plan that addressed the medical, physical and psychosocial needs of two residents (Residents #202 and #31). The facility also failed to address one resident's nutritional needs, including a significant weight loss (Resident #16) and another resident (Resident #102), who received hospice services. The census was 82. 1. Review of Resident #202's Baseline Care Plan, dated 11/15/19, showed -admitted on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included left below knee amputation, impaired brain function and history of alcohol abuse; -Regular diet. Provide diet as ordered and provide supplements. Further review of the resident's medical record, showed no comprehensive care plan completed in the resident's electronic or paper medical record. During an interview on 2/10/20 at 10:28 A.M., Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) B said the resident had a comprehensive care plan completed, but it was in an electronic medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater. Out of 30 opportunities observed, there were two errors, resulting in a 6.67% medication error rate (Resident #155). The census was 82. Review of the facility's policy on the Administration of Eye Drops, updated 1/6/19, showed: -Policy: Medications are administered as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Personnel authorized to administer medication do so only after they have familiarized themselves with the medications; -#5. Instruct resident to close eyes slowly to allow for even distribution over the surface of the eye and apply gentle pressure to the tear duct for one minute or by gently closing the eye for 3 minutes. Review of Resident #155's physician's order sheet (POS), dated 2/1/20 through 2/29/20, showed: -Brimonidine tartrate (eye medication used to treat glaucoma) 0.15%, one drop both eyes three times per day; -Dorzolamide (eye medication used to treat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-11 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete significant change Minimum Data Sets (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, for two residents enrolled in hospice programs (Residents #102 and #12). The census was 82. 1. Review of Resident #102's medical record, showed: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -An admission MDS completed on 7/23/19; -admitted to hospice on 11/18/19; -No significant change MDS completed to reflect admission to hospice. 2. Review of Resident #12's medical record, showed: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -admitted to hospice on 1/10/20; -No significant change MDS completed to reflect admission to hospice. 3. During an interview on 2/11/20 at 12:15 P.M., the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) said the facility hired a new employee to complete and submit MDSs in January 2020. The person who previously held the MDS position had been completing the MDSs, but not electronically transmitting them. All MDSs should be transmitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-11 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and electronically transmit resident Minimum Data Sets (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, for six out of 46 sampled residents (Residents #12, #6, #16, #34, #252, and #42). The census was 82. 1. Review of Resident #12's medical record, showed: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -discharged from the facility, return not anticipated, on 11/26/19; -No discharge MDS completed or transmitted. 2. Review of Resident #6's medical record, showed: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -discharged from the facility, return not anticipated, on 12/18/19; -No discharge MDS completed or transmitted. 3. Review of Resident #16's medical record, showed: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -A quarterly MDS completed 5/23/19; -A significant change MDS, completed on 10/15/19, not transmitted. 4. Review of Resident #34's medical record, showed: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -An entry MDS completed on 6/18/19, not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all physician's orders were followed by not checking blood pressures and pulses as ordered prior to administering medication and ensuring a timely response to a dietary recommendation for a resident with weight loss as ordered for three of 46 sampled residents (Residents #152, #155 and #202). The census was 82. 1. Review of Resident #152's physician's order sheet (POS), dated 1/1/20 through 1/31/20, showed: -Amlodipine (medication used to treat high blood pressure) 10 (milligram) mg one tablet by mouth once daily. Hold if systolic (top number of the blood pressure) blood pressure is less than 100 or pulse less than 60; -Check pulse in the morning and record; -Check blood pressure in the morning and record. Review of the resident's medication administration record (MAR), dated 1/1/20 through 1/31/20, showed: -Front of MAR: Amlodipine 10 mg once daily. Hold if systolic less than 100 or pulse less than 60; -Staff documented pulse as 54…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-12-23 · tag F0575 — widespreadPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on an interview, a review of the facility's survey notebook, and a review of the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services website, the facility failed to maintain a posting of its current survey results. The survey sample was 24 residents with a supplemental 25 residents. Refer to F577 Findings include: A review of the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services website revealed the facility had surveys on the following dates: 02/26/24 A complaint investigation survey 04/02/24 A complaint investigation survey 05/31/24 A complaint investigation survey 07/12/24 A complaint investigation survey A review of the facility's survey notebook revealed the notebook only contained the recertification/complaint survey results from 08/24/23. An interview on 12/18/24 at 7:08 pm with the Administrator revealed the survey results are kept in a yellow notebook in a location where the residents can review. The Administrator also stated that she only maintained the state and life safety survey. The Administrator stated that she was unaware that she should post the surveys that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-12-23 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the interview and a review of the facility's resident council meeting minutes, the facility failed to inform and review with the residents of the facility's survey results. During a group meeting nine of nine residents (Resident (R) 2, 15, 26, 34, 40, 41, 46, 51, and 57) stated that they were unaware of the location of the survey results and that the results were never discussed with them. The total sample was 24 residents with 25 supplement residents. Findings include: A review of the facility's Resident Council Meeting Minutes provided by the Activity Director failed to reveal any discussion of the facility's past survey results or the location of the survey results. During a meeting with nine representatives of the Resident Council on 12/18/24 at 1:30 PM it was revealed they were aware that surveyors had been in the facility from time to time. However, no one from the administration ever discussed the results of the surveys. The nine group members also stated they were unaware of the location of the survey results or that they could ask to see the survey results. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-08-24 · tag F0570 — widespreadAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they maintained an adequate surety bond for the resident trust fund account in the amount of one and one half times the average monthly balance for the past 12 months. The census was 80. Review of the facility's Management/Protection of Resident Funds policy, updated 1/25/23, showed: -The facility has a surety bond to assure the security of the resident's personal fund deposited with the facility; -The policy failed to provide guidance on how to monitor the facility's surety bond to ensure it was sufficient. Review of the resident trust account for the past 12 months, from August 2022 to July 2023, showed an average monthly balance of $89,000.00 (this would yield a required bond in the amount of $133,500.00 (one and one half times the average monthly balance)). Review of the bond report for approved facility bonds by Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS), showed an approved bond of $100,000.00, dated 12/8/21. Review of the resident trust current balance report for August 2023, showed an amount of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-08-24 · tag F0575 — widespreadPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post, in a form and manner accessible and understandable to residents and resident representatives, the name, address, and telephone number for the State Survey Agency, the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman program, and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency concerning any suspected violation of state or federal nursing facility regulation, including but not limited to resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. The census was 80. Observations throughout the survey from 8/20/23 through 8/23/23, showed no visible postings in the facility of contact information for the State Survey Agency or LTC Ombudsman program, or a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency concerning suspected violations of state of federal regulations. During a resident council meeting on 8/22/23 at 10:20 A.M., six out of six residents, whom the facility identified as alert and oriented, said they did not know…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-08-24 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post the results of the most recent survey of the facility in a place readily accessible to residents, family members and legal representatives of residents. The census was 80. Review of the facility's admission Agreement, provided to residents upon admission, showed: -The results of the most recent long term care inspection conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any approved plan(s) of correction in effect with respect to this facility are accessible 24 hours a day to residents and visitors. Observations throughout the survey from 8/20/23 through 8/24/23, showed no survey results posted in an accessible area of the facility. During a group interview on 8/22/23 at 10:20 A.M., six out of six residents, whom the facility identified as alert and oriented, said they did not know where survey results were located. During an interview on 8/23/23 at 1:49 P.M., the Administrator said she was not sure where the state survey binder was located. Results of the most recent state survey should be posted in a visible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-08-24 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to mail delivered on Saturdays. This had the potential to affect all residents at the facility. The census was 80. Review of the facility's admission Agreement, provided to residents upon admission, showed: -The residents have the right to send and receive unopened mail; -The mail is sorted out by the Business Office and is delivered by Social Services Monday through Friday, on the weekends, it is either delivered by the Manager on Duty or the Nurse on Duty. During a group interview on 8/22/23 at 10:20 A.M., six residents, whom the facility identified as alert and oriented, attended the group meeting. The residents said they did not receive mail on Saturdays. All residents said the Social Worker delivers the mail on weekdays but not on weekends. During an interview on 8/24/23 at 12:33 P.M., the Administrator said she collects the residents' mail delivered to the facility, then the Social Worker distributes them to the residents on Monday through Friday. The residents' mail is not delivered on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$66,640 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $66,640 — penalty dated 2024-07-12
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROSENBERG, ZEV | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 60% | since 11/01/2014 |
| FLEETWOOD, ELAINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/03/2025 |
| GAO, SHAWN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $725K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265712. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.