No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Fountain Care At Sunset Hills

10954 Kennerly Road, Saint Louis, MO 63128 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 166 certified beds · (314) 843-4242 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jul 2024Resident-funds citations (F0568, F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$105,665 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jul 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (78) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $105,665 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-21)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (80%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
12399 Gravois Rd · (314) 843-3828 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens1.3 mi
11590 Gravois Rd · (314) 849-6348 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
11674 Gravois Rd · (314) 843-2200 · Call to confirm hours
Place of worship
9735 Landmark Parkway Dr · (314) 966-5853

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.9%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.5%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms55.4%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.6%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.8%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.3%25.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.2%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.9%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.9%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.1%23.5%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication6.3%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine28.0%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.4%26.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.2%13.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.482.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.052.331.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
35.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 35.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.7%CMS range 29.6–56.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 6.8–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge35.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge25.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge22.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.3%CMS range 5.0–12.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.231.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.13
RN hours/ resident / day
1.07
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.35
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.54
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.10
RN hoursweekends
79.8%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 166 beds and averages 85.0 residents a day — about 51% occupied, or roughly 81 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.13 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.14 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 80% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-24)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2023-10-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

78 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 62 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    See deficiency cited at Event ID #172413 Based on interview and record review, staff failed to implement a system to ensure facility staff communicated a report on residents' conditions to agency staff prior to their shifts and failed to direct agency staff where to find the binder containing instructions on residents' care needs. The facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #18) care plan instructions for staff reflected the resident's assessed needs, including use of mechanical lift for transfers. On 12/17/24 around 12:00 P.M., an unknown nurse directed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) C to transfer the resident from his/her bed without communication of the resident's need for mechanical lift transfer. CNA C utilized a gait belt, instead of using a Hoyer lift (mechanical lift). The resident fell during the transfer and sustained fractures to his/her ribs, legs, and left ankle. The resident's physician said staff failed to notify him/her of the incident until later in the evening. EMS did not transfer the resident to the hospital until 10:08 P.M. and reported the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, staff failed to implement a system to ensure facility staff communicated a report on residents' conditions to agency staff prior to their shifts and failed to direct agency staff where to find the binder containing instructions on residents' care needs. The facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #18) care plan instructions for staff reflected the resident's assessed needs, including use of mechanical lift for transfers. On 12/17/24 around 12:00 P.M., an unknown nurse directed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) C to transfer the resident from his/her bed without communication of the resident's need for mechanical lift transfer. CNA C utilized a gait belt, instead of using a Hoyer lift (mechanical lift). The resident fell during the transfer and sustained fractures to his/her ribs, legs, and left ankle. The resident's physician said staff failed to notify him/her of the incident until later in the evening. EMS did not transfer the resident to the hospital until 10:08 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #104) with a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) was served food in the proper consistency to prevent choking. Staff reported the resident was routinely served a whole, hardboiled egg for breakfast. On 12/17/23, the resident was found unresponsive in the first-floor dining room. Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR, a lifesaving technique used when breathing or heartbeat has stopped) was started and a piece of hard boiled egg, approximately 2 inches in diameter, was removed from the resident's mouth. The resident expired at the facility. The census was 97. The Administrator was notified on 12/21/23 at 4:00 P. M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) past noncompliance which began on 12/17/23. The facility implemented a process and inserviced staff on ensuring food is served from the kitchen matching the food tickets, the requirement that eggs must be cut up, setting up resident trays, and cutting food for the residents. Nursing is to read the ticket when passing trays and ensure the food is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #3) received care consistent with professional standards and facility policy to prevent and/or treat pressure ulcers (a localized injury to skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure or friction). The facility identified small break down on the resident's buttocks on 5/25/24. The area was not staged at that time. No treatment order was obtained and treatments were documented as provided from 5/25/23 until 7/3/24. Licensed nursing staff failed to complete weekly skin assessments between the dates of 6/15/24 and 7/3/24. On 7/3/24, a stage III pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss, subcutaneous fat may be visible, but the bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed) was discovered. Staff failed to identify and treat the pressure ulcer until it had already progressed to a stage III. The sample size was 4. The census was 92. Review of the facility's Skin Program Policy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-08-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy to protect all residents from harm when management staff failed to suspend an employee, per facility policy, after an allegation of abuse was made. The resident called his/her family, crying, on the evening of 8/2/23 and reported the disrespectful comments made by Certified Medication Technician (CMT) D. The family then reported this information to Nurse B who reported the incident to the administrator. The facility investigation was started on 8/2/83 by the Director of Nursing and completed on 8/3/23. CMT D was not suspended per policy until Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) H and CNA I were finally interviewed on 8/8/23 and the administrator learned the resident had been upset and crying when the incident occurred and refused to take medications from CMT D. CMT D continued to work at the facility on 8/3/23, 8/5/23, 8/6/23, and 8/7/23. The facility census was 90. Review of the facility Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property, and Injury of Unknown Origin policy, dated 8/17/16 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, staff failed to assess a resident with aphagia and a continuous tube feeding when the resident had emesis and a change of behavioral/physical changes. Review of the resident's progress notes showed no documentaion regarding an assessment, monitoring or physician notification of the resident's change of condition and emesis. Three residents with changes in condition were sampled and problems were found with one (Resident #2). The census was 90. Review of the facility's Enteral Feedings (tube feeding) policy, dated 1/2018 and last reviewed on 1/2022, showed: -Protocol: To minimize the risk of aspiration (inhaling food/fluid into the lungs), the head of a resident/patient's bed will be elevated 30 to 45 degrees while enteral feeding is infusing; -Procedure: Continuous Feeding/Infusion Pump: -Notify the Physician if gastric residual (aspiration of the stomach contents at intervals is recommended to ensure the feeding is not backing up due to a possible obstruction) is greater that 50 cubic centimeters (cc, one cc is equivalent to one ounce) or as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to communicate and attempt to resolve one resident's refusal to take medications scheduled at 8:00 A.M., because he/she was sleeping. Review of the resident's 1/2026 medication administration record (MAR) from 1/1/26 through 1/26/26, showed the resident did not receive eight of eight medications scheduled at 8:00 A.M. on 10 separate days, and two of three doses of one medication scheduled at 8:00 A.M. every Wednesday (Resident #8). The facility also failed to ensure one resident (Resident #2) with a new order for Azithromycin (antibiotic) for pneumonia received the first dose timely. The antibiotic was available in the facility Electronic Emergency Kit (E-Kit, a dispensing system located at the facility containing commonly used medications) but the first dose was not administered for approximately 15 hours after being ordered. The facility also failed to ensure that same resident did not run out of two medications that required a physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify one resident's physician and obtain treatment orders for skin issues/wounds they identified on a skin check upon the resident's admission on [DATE]. As of 12/23/25, when the resident passed away, the facility had not contacted the resident's physician regarding the skin issues/wounds, had not received treatment orders and had not documented the skin issues/wounds on the electronic treatment administration record (TAR) for on-going monitoring and assessment. Three residents were sampled for wounds, and problems were identified with one (Resident #1). The census was 84.Review of the facility's Skin Program Policy and Procedure revised 12/2023, showed:Purpose: The purpose of the skin program is to ensure that every resident's skin condition is observed/evaluated on admission and a comprehensive and interdisciplinary care plan is developed and maintained to treat actual and/or prevent potential skin problems;-Policy: All residents are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify one resident's physician and obtain treatment orders for a pressure ulcer/injury (localized damage to the skin that usually occur over a bony prominence as a result of pressure) on one resident's coccyx (tailbone) that was identified on a skin check upon the resident's admission on [DATE]. As of 12/23/25, when the resident passed away, the facility had not contacted the resident's physician, had not received treatment orders and had not documented the pressure ulcer/injury on the electronic treatment administration record (TAR) for on-going monitoring, assessment and treatment. Three residents were sampled for wounds, and problems were identified with one (Resident #1). The census was 84.Review of the facility Skin Program Policy and Procedure revised 12/2023, showed:Purpose: The purpose of the skin program is to ensure that every resident's skin condition is observed/evaluated on admission and a comprehensive and interdisciplinary care plan is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident rooms and resident-use areas in the facility in a clean and homelike manner. Concerns were noted with three of 18 sampled residents' rooms (Residents #9, #195 and #194), and multiple resident-use areas on the Fountain Hall. The facility census was 89. Review of the facility's Cleaning and Disinfecting of Environmental Surfaces and Equipment policy, revised July 2024 showed: -Reusable items such as durable medical equipment shall be disinfected after each use and between residents; -Housecleaning surfaces (e.g. floors, tabletops) will be cleaned on a regular basis, when spills occur, and when the area is visibly soiled; -Environmental surfaces will be disinfected (or cleaned) on a regular basis (e.g. daily, three times per week) and when surfaces are visibly soiled; -Walls, blinds, and window curtains in resident care areas will be cleaned when these surfaces are visibly soiled. Review of the facility's Housekeeping Aide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of record for all controlled drugs with sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for one out of three narcotic books reviewed. The census was 89. Review of the facility's Controlled Substance Storage policy, revised January 2018, showed: -Policy: Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classifications as controlled substances are subject to special handling, storage, disposal, and recordkeeping in the facility in accordance with federal, state, and other applicable laws and regulations; -At each shift change, or when keys are transferred, a physical inventory of all controlled substances, including refrigerated items is conducted by two licensed nurses and is documented on the shift verification of controlled substance count. 1. Review of the Complex Hall Controlled Substance Shift change count sheet, dated 3/1 through 3/31/25, showed: -Eight out of 62 shifts have no nurse signature on the shift change count; -Twenty-two out of 62 shifts only have one nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep the kitchen equipment clean and floors free of trash and grime. The census was 89. Review of the facility's kitchen department sanitation policy, dated 1/2021, showed: -Purpose: to ensure a clean and sanitary work environment; to promote and protect food safety; and, to maintain compliance with federal, state, and local guidelines and regulations governing food sanitation and safety; -Policy: the department sanitation shall be maintained in a manner to support procedures for food safety. Staff shall be responsible for daily and weekly cleaning assignments as determined by the Dietary Manager and/or his/her designee. Cleaning assignments shall include all equipment, storage areas, walls, floors and refrigeration units. Cleaning of equipment condensers, lighting fixtures, vents, etc. shall be completed by the Maintenance Department as determined by the Administrator. Review of the facility's kitchen cleaning schedule, undated, showed: -Daily Cleaning: oven, deep fryer, floors, and refrigerators. 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control standards by not implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), for thee residents (Residents #195, #15, and #24) who required EBP for wounds requiring treatment or centrally inserted devices used for dialysis (the process of filtering the blood for individuals with kidney failure). In addition, the facility failed to ensure newly admitted residents were provided a two-step Mantoux Purified Protein Derivative (PPD, used to test for tuberculosis (TB) infection) tuberculin test per facility policy, for four of five residents sampled for TB testing (Resident's #80, #195,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow acceptable nursing practice when the facility's staff left medication in two residents' room (Resident #194 and Resident #44), who did not have a physician order for self-administration or medications to be left at the bedside. The sample was 20. The census was 89. Review of the facility's Bedside Medication Storage policy, revised January 2018, showed: -Policy: Bedside medication storage is permitted for residents wish to self-administer medications, upon the written order of the prescriber and once self-administration skills have been assessed and deemed appropriate in the judgement of the facility's interdisciplinary resident assessment team; -Procedures: A written order for the bedside storage of medications is present in the resident's medical record; Bedside storage of medications in indicated on the resident Medication Administration Record (MAR) and in the care plan for the appropriate medications; The resident is instructed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards by not performing accurate and timely skin assessments for one resident, in accordance with the facility's policy (Resident #96). The sample size was 20. The census was 89. Review of the facility's Skin Program Policy and Procedure, revised, 1/15/25, showed: -Purpose: The purpose of the skin program is to ensure that every resident's skin condition is observed and evaluated on admission and comprehensive and interdisciplinary care plan is developed and maintained to treat actual and or prevent potential skin problems. -Policy: All residents are observed and evaluated upon admission and as needed for actual and/or potential skin problems. All residents will receive an individualized preventive skin plan of care at the time of admission. -Procedure: The nurse assesses and evaluates all residents upon admission; The initial skin observation and evaluation is a full body audit and completion of the Braden Scale (an assessment to determine if a resident is at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received activities of daily living (ADL) care (Residents #195, #194 and #58). The sample was 20. The census was 89. Review of the facility's personal care needs policy, dated 1/24, showed: -Protocol: the facility strives to promote a healthy environment and prevent infection by meeting the personal care needs of the residents. The facility also provides the needed support when the resident performs their ADLs. The Interdisciplinary Plan of Care (IPOC) will address the individual needs and preferences of the resident. Personal care and ADL support will be provided according to the resident Plan of Care. Personal care and support include but is not limited to the following: ambulation, assistance with meals, bath/shower, catheter care, denture care, grooming/dressing, mouth care, nail care, peri care, repositioning, shampoo, shaving, and toileting; -Procedure: develop and implement individualized interventions.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 62 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5%. Out of 27 opportunities observed, four errors occurred, resulting in a 14.81% error rate (Resident #44 and Resident #58). The census was 89. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, reviewed January 2024, showed: -Purpose: -To administer the following: -Right medication; -Right dose; -Right dosage form; -Right route; -Right resident; -Right time; -Procedure: -Read the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the ordered medication, dose, dosage form, route, and time; -Review the resident's allergies; -Verify the pharmacy prescription on the drug and the manufacturer's identification system matches the MAR; -Verify that any further medication identifiers match the label and the medication; Identifiers may include, but are not limited to -Drug size; -Shape; -Color. -Verify the correction medications , expiration date, dose, dosage form, route and time again by comparing to MAR before administering; -Administer oral medications with a full glass of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at a palatable, safe, and appetizing temperature during tray service by failing to maintain the temperature of hot food at least at 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F). This affected 2 of 20 sampled residents (Residents #15 and #34). The census was 89. Review of the facility's meal service temperature policy, dated 1/2019, showed: -Purpose: to ensure appropriate food temperatures during meal service and to ensure appropriate food holding temperatures. To comply with federal and state regulations governing food meal service; -Policy: foods shall be provided at point of service to support resident/patient satisfaction. Temperatures of hot food shall be supported to promote service temperatures of hot foods to about 120 degrees F and cold foods to below 50 degrees F. 1. Review of Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/14/25, showed:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving dialysis (medical procedure that filters blood when the kidneys are unable to) received breakfast before dialysis. The facility identified 11 residents as receiving dialysis. Of the 11, four were included in the sample of 20 and issues were identified with two residents (Residents #15 and #80). The census was 89. 1. Review of Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/14/25, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Receives dialysis while a resident; -Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes and kidney failure. Review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 4/21/25, showed an order, dated 2/13/25, in house dialysis Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. During an interview on 4/22/25 at 12:23 P.M., the resident said he/she never gets breakfast before he/she goes to in-house dialysis and has to wait until dialysis is over to eat. He/She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights were accessible for two residents (Residents #15 and #58). The sample was 20. The census was 89. Review of the facility's call light protocol policy, dated 1/2022, showed: -Purpose: to respond to resident/patient's request and needs; -Procedure: answer call light in a reasonable amount of time. Respond to request. When unable to meet request, obtain assistance from caregiver that can meet request. Assist resident/patient as needed to a comfortable position with call light within reach. 1. Review of Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/14/25, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes, kidney failure, and hemiplegia (muscle weakness) and hemiparesis(partial paralysis) following cerebral infarction(stroke) affecting left non-dominant side. Review of the resident's care plan, in use at the time of the survey,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See Event 172412 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy by thoroughly investigating in a timely manner allegations of resident to resident altercations (Residents #15 and Resident #16, and Residents #10 and Resident #11). The sample was 10. The census was 98. Review of the facility Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Mistreatment Policy, dated 5/1/2018, showed the following: -Policy: -The facility's leadership prohibits neglect, mental, physical and/or verbal abuse, use of a physical and/or chemical restraint not required to treat a medical condition, involuntary seclusion, corporal punishment and misappropriation of a resident's property and/or funds and ensures that alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, and are reported immediately; -The facility's leadership will conduct a prompt investigation of any allegation received of suspected abuse, neglect or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See Event 172412 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within the required time after residents were involved in resident to resident altercations (Residents #15 and Resident #16, and Residents #10 and Resident #11) The sample size was 10. The census was 98. Review of the facility Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Mistreatment Policy, dated 5/1/2018, showed the following: -Policy: -The facility's leadership prohibits neglect, mental, physical and/or verbal abuse, use of a physical and/or chemical restraint not required to treat a medical condition, involuntary seclusion, corporal punishment and misappropriation of a resident's property and/or funds and ensures that alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, and are reported immediately; -The facility shall report immediately, but not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy by thoroughly investigating in a timely manner allegations of resident to resident altercations (Residents #15 and Resident #16, and Residents #10 and Resident #11). The sample was 10. The census was 98. Review of the facility Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Mistreatment Policy, dated 5/1/2018, showed the following: -Policy: -The facility's leadership prohibits neglect, mental, physical and/or verbal abuse, use of a physical and/or chemical restraint not required to treat a medical condition, involuntary seclusion, corporal punishment and misappropriation of a resident's property and/or funds and ensures that alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, and are reported immediately; -The facility's leadership will conduct a prompt investigation of any allegation received of suspected abuse, neglect or exploitation or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within the required time after residents were involved in resident to resident altercations (Residents #15 and Resident #16, and Residents #10 and Resident #11) The sample size was 10. The census was 98. Review of the facility Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Mistreatment Policy, dated 5/1/2018, showed the following: -Policy: -The facility's leadership prohibits neglect, mental, physical and/or verbal abuse, use of a physical and/or chemical restraint not required to treat a medical condition, involuntary seclusion, corporal punishment and misappropriation of a resident's property and/or funds and ensures that alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, and are reported immediately; -The facility shall report immediately, but not later than two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address a recommendation from the Registered Dietitian (RD) for a resident with a significant weight loss, to prevent further weight loss (Resident #2). The sample was six. The census was 101. Review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/1/24, showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Dependent with activities of daily living (ADLs); -Diagnoses of a stroke; -Weight 157 pounds (lbs); -Gastronomy tube (g-tube, flexible, hollow tube that is inserted through the stomach wall and skin to deliver food and medicine directly to the stomach); -Risk for pressure ulcers(a localized area of damaged skin or tissue that occurs when pressure is applied to the skin for a prolonged period of time). Review of the resident's care plan, dated 7/5/24, showed the following: -Focus: G-tube: Alteration in nutritional status related to g-tube placement; -Intervention: Check g-tube for placement prior to administering medication or anything via…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the diversion (the unauthorized removal) of Schedule II controlled medications (medication with higher potential of dependency and abuse) for two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 4 sampled residents. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The census was 92. The Administrator was notified on 7/23/24, of the past non-compliance which began on 7/4/24. The facility began an investigation, counted the medication carts, added a corrected count to all controlled substance logs, interviewed staff and residents, notified the police, the residents affected and their physician, in-serviced staff on abuse and misappropriation of resident property (including drug diversion) and terminated Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A. The deficiency was corrected on 7/10/24. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property, Injury of Unknown Origin Policy, revised 8/1/22, included: Prevention and Reporting: -The Administrator has primary responsibility in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an appropriate immediate discharge letter to one of three sampled residents (Resident #2). The letter failed to contain the location to where the resident was being transferred and discharged , failed to disclose the appeal rights and the correspondence information and the name, address and telephone number of the designated regional long-term care ombudsman office. In addition, the facility failed to readmit the resident when the discharge was dismissed. The census was 93. Review of the facility's Room Changes, Transfers, and Discharges policy, dated 7/2022, showed: -The resident/patient's physician must document evidence in the resident/ patient's clinical record that a discharge is necessary for the following: -The facility determines that the discharge is necessary for the resident/patient's welfare and the resident/patient's needs cannot be met in the facility; -The safety of individuals in the facility is endangered. -The facility will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy when an injury of unknown origin was discovered and not reported, assessed, or investigated for one resident (Resident #1). The census was 92. Review of the facility's Accident and Incident Protocol, reviewed 7/2022, included: -The facility strives to ensure that residents/patients, visitors, and/or volunteers will not experience undue discomfort and/or have their health and safety placed in jeopardy due to an unusual occurrence (accident/incident); -The facility defines an accident/incident as an event, occurrence, or happening that may produce an actual or potential undesirable outcome; -The event may be an accident or a situation that could result in an accident. Accidents/incidents may include, but are not limited to the following: 1. Unexplained bruises/skin tears; 2. Injuries of unknown origin; 3. Injury to resident/patient during handling; -Should an accident/incident occur, the facility strives to prevent such an occurrence from happening again; -A thorough investigation and follow-up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy by not obtaining a physician's order for a skin tear of unknown origin for one resident (Resident #1), thereby potentially increasing the risk of a negative outcome related to the healing process due to a diagnoses of Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease. The census was 92. Review of the facility's Physician Orders policy, last revised 5/1/11, showed: -Protocol: At the time each resident/patient is admitted , the facility will have physician orders for their immediate care. Physician's orders will be verified by the attending physician at the facility. All physician orders will be dated and signed according to State and Federal regulations; -All clinicians may take verbal and/or telephone orders as permitted by their state licensure board; Procedures included: -Obtain one on the following types of physician orders: -Verbal; -Telephone order; -Transmitted by facsimile machine (fax); -Written by the physician; -Assure physician's orders include the drug or treatment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-27 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See the deficiency cited at Event J2L412. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident (Resident #400) from misappropriation of property when a staff member took a resident's baseball cap, which he/she received during a trip to the baseball game. The resident said he/she wanted his/her baseball cap back, and not having it made him/her feel bad and sad. The sample size was 14. The census was 94. Review of the Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property, Injury of Unknown Origin Policy, revised August 1, 2022, included the following: -Prevention and Reporting: -The facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect and abuse of residents and misappropriation of resident property by anyone including staff, family, friends, etc; -Definitions: -Misappropriation of Resident Property (Includes but is not limited to): Deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    See the deficiency cited at Event J2L412. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of misappropriation was reported to the facility Administrator and the state agency in a timely manner, when a staff member, Housekeeper B, removed a resident's baseball cap from the resident's room without his/her knowledge or consent (Resident #400). Another staff member, Housekeeper D, saw Housekeeper B with the resident's baseball cap but did not report the allegation to management until a week later when management asked him/her about the incident. The incident of misappropriation occurred on 11/8/23. The incident was reported to the Administrator on 11/14/23 and to the state agency on 11/15/23. The sample size was 14. The census was 94. Review of the Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property, Injury of Unknown Origin Policy, revised August 1, 2022, included the following: -Prevention and Reporting: -The facility encourages and supports all residents, staff and families in feeling free to report any suspected acts of abuse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility failed to staff a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight (8) hours a day, seven (7) days a week and failed to ensure the Director of Nursing (DON) worked as a charge nurse only when the facility had a census of 60 or less. The census upon the entrance of the survey team was 102. The findings include: At approximately 12:40 p.m. on 10/11/23, the surveyor asked Receptionist RR for the location of the facility's posting of daily nurse staffing information. Receptionist RR pointed to a plastic sign holder located on the reception desk. In the plastic holder was a sheet of paper titled CHESTNUT REHAB. The date on the top of the form was 10/10/23, and the census was 103. The form included hours worked by Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), Certified Medication Technicians (CMTs), and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) on the day shift and the evening shift, as well as hours worked by LPNs and CNAs on the night shift. Documentation on the form indicated there were no hours worked on any shift by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were securely locked, failed to ensure medication rooms were securely locked, failed to ensure medications contained opened and expiration dates, failed to ensure medication refrigerators were free from spills, and failed to ensure temperature monitoring was documented. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy and procedures titled Medication Storage in The Facility, dated November 2021, indicated: . ID1: Storage of Medications . Policy - Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. Procedures . B. Only licensed nurses, pharmacy personnel and those lawfully authorized to administer medications (such as medication aides) permitted to access medications.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one main kitchen. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage - Refrigeration last revised 1/2016, revealed: 4 - All refrigeration units shall have temperatures monitored on a daily basis by the Manager and/or his/her designee. Temperatures shall be recorded daily and the monthly record shall be maintained in the Managers office for a period of two (2) years. Internal thermometers shall be placed in the front section of each unit and shall be large enough for easy visibility visibility. Refrigeration temperatures shall be maintained below 40 degrees but with a preferred temperature of 36-38 degrees for maximum chilling. [sic] On 10/10/23 at 9:45 a.m., the reach-in refrigerator (near the handwashing sink) did not have a thermometer inside of the unit. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) stated that when she last checked, there was a thermometer in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-13 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the dumpster area in a manner to keep the area clean and free of waste. This affected two of two dumpsters used to serve the facility. The findings include: On 10/10/23 at 9:57 a.m., 10/10/23 at 2:50 p.m., 10/11/23 at 7:48 a.m., and 10/11/23 at 11:49 a.m., the ground surrounding the dumpsters had a heavy accumulation of trash, cigarette butts, and debris. There were two trash compactors, and the lid of one of the trash compactors was open. Staff were not observed taking out any trash. During an interview with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 10/10/23 at 10:00 a.m., the CDM stated the dumpsters are used by all departments of the facility, including nursing. The CDM stated she expected all departments that utilized the dumpsters to keep the area clean. The CDM stated everyone should be pitching in to keep it clean, not just dietary. The CDM revealed she and other dietary staff had seen wildlife (racoons, possums, deer, and rodents) near the dumpster area because of the heavy accumulation of waste and trash on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to protect the dignity of three of six residents reviewed for urinary catheters [Resident (R) #9, R #18, and R #24]. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights revealed: The facility will address ethical issues and respect resident rights in providing care. The facility recognizes the resident right to a quality of life that supports privacy, confidentiality, independent expression, choice, and decision making, consistent with State law and Federal regulation. [sic] 1. On 10/10/23 at 11:00 a.m., 11:53 a.m., and 1:00 p.m., observations of R #9's foley catheter bag was visible to staff and visitors. The catheter bag was observed to contain a yellow substance and was not covered to protect the resident's dignity. Staff were not observed to ask the resident if they could empty the catheter bag, nor were staff observed to provide the resident with a privacy cover. R #9 was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide the residents with a safe, sanitary, and comfortable homelike environment for two of three units observed during the survey. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Cleaning and Disinfecting, last updated 7/2022, revealed: Purpose - The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for cleaning and disinfecting. General Guidelines 1. Housekeeping surfaces (e.g., floors, tabletops) will be cleaned on a regular basis, when spills occur, and when these surfaces are visibly soiled. 2. Environmental surfaces will be disinfected (or cleaned) on a regular basis (e.g., daily, three [3] times per week) and when surfaces are visibly soiled. Further review of the policy revealed an adendum [sic], dated 10/11/23, stating: All common areas (lobbies, hallways, day room etc.) will be cleaned daily and as needed including sweeping, mopping, dusting, vacuuming, etc. Dining rooms will be swept and mopped after every meal and as needed. [sic] 1. On 10/10/23 at 10:42 a.m., 12:50…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control program by: 1. Failing to ensure one Certified Medication Technician (CMT) performed hand hygiene during administration of medications; and one CMT and one Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) cleaned a portable blood pressure cuff before or after using it on different residents; and 2. Failing to develop and implement written policies and procedures in accordance with accepted national standards and guidelines for the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) when suctioning during tracheostomy care. The findings include:1. During medication administration observations on 10/11/23 at 7:52 a.m., CMT BB removed a portable blood pressure cuff from the top of the medication cart and entered the room of Resident (R) #12. CMT BB attached the blood pressure monitor cuff to R #12's upper arm and measured his blood pressure. CMT BB then placed the blood pressure monitor to the top of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident (Resident #400) from misappropriation of property when a staff member took a resident's baseball cap, which he/she received during a trip to the baseball game. The resident said he/she wanted his/her baseball cap back, and not having it made him/her feel bad and sad. The sample size was 14. The census was 94. Review of the Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property, Injury of Unknown Origin Policy, revised August 1, 2022, included the following: -Prevention and Reporting: -The facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect and abuse of residents and misappropriation of resident property by anyone including staff, family, friends, etc; -Definitions: -Misappropriation of Resident Property (Includes but is not limited to): Deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. Review of Resident #400's annual Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of misappropriation was reported to the facility Administrator and the state agency in a timely manner, when a staff member, Housekeeper B, removed a resident's baseball cap from the resident's room without his/her knowledge or consent (Resident #400). Another staff member, Housekeeper D, saw Housekeeper B with the resident's baseball cap but did not report the allegation to management until a week later when management asked him/her about the incident. The incident of misappropriation occurred on 11/8/23. The incident was reported to the Administrator on 11/14/23 and to the state agency on 11/15/23. The sample size was 14. The census was 94. Review of the Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property, Injury of Unknown Origin Policy, revised August 1, 2022, included the following: -Prevention and Reporting: -The facility encourages and supports all residents, staff and families in feeling free to report any suspected acts of abuse, neglect, misappropriation or injury of unknown…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed in a timely manner after a significant change in status was identified for one of 20 residents [Resident (R) #64] reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy title, MDS Process, dated 1/2022, revealed: Policy: The facility will complete the MDS/RAI [Resident Assessment Instrument] process according to and in compliance with Federal and State Mandates. Procedure: The MDS Nurse/Coordinator and team members contributing to the MDS process will complete the MDS/RAI process and all related functions in compliance with Federal and State mandates, utilizing guidelines established in the Federal RAI manual. R #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, degenerative disease of nervous systems (neurodegenerative diseases affects the body's activities such as balance,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one of 20 residents [Resident (R) #64] reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled MDS Process, dated 1/2022, revealed: Policy: The facility will complete the MDS/RAI [Resident Assessment Instrument] process according to and in compliance with Federal and State Mandates. Procedure: The MDS Nurse/Coordinator and team members contributing to the MDS process will complete the MDS/RAI process and all related functions in compliance with Federal and State mandates, utilizing guidelines established in the Federal RAI manual. R #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, degenerative disease of nervous systems (neurodegenerative diseases affects the body's activities such as balance, movement, talking, breathing, and heart function), heart failure, and acute kidney failure.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care was reviewed and revised after a fall for one of 20 residents whose care plans were reviewed (Resident (R) #7). The findings include: Review of facility policy titled Falls Programs Policy and Procedure, with a review date of 1/2023, revealed the purpose of the policy was to identify all residents who have a high risk for falls and to ensure adequate interventions are in place to prevent a major injury. The procedure section noted, 3. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) nurse will be responsible for completing the Comprehensive Plan of Care for falls. The policy does not identify to review and revise the plan of care after each fall to ensure interventions identified were effective or needed revision. Review of facility policy titled Policy for Comprehensive Care Planning, with a review date of January 2022, revealed, the purpose was to develop and maintain an individualized care plan for residents residing in the facility. The procedure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents reviewed received a final summary of the resident's status prior to being discharged from the facility [Resident (R) #99]. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Room Changes, Transfers, and Discharges, last reviewed 4/2022, revealed: Protocol . Transfers and discharges will be conducted according to State and Federal regulations. Review of R #99's face sheet revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 8/27/23 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, osteoarthritis of knee, pain, and presence of right artificial knee joint. Further review of R #99's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the resident discharged herself from the facility Against Medical Advice (AMA). Review of R #99's Voluntary Discharge Against Medical Advice and Release of Liability form, dated 8/27/23, revealed the resident was discharged and taken home by her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure emergency equipment was available at the bedside for immediate access in the event of an unplanned decannulation for one of three residents reviewed for tracheostomy care [Resident (R) #90]. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Tracheostomy and Tracheostomy Tube Care (undated) found no mention of the need to maintain sterile emergency equipment at the bedside for immediate access in the event of unplanned extubation or decannulation. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services identified the following: . the facility must determine whether it has the capability and capacity to provide the needed respiratory care/services for a resident with a respiratory diagnosis or syndrome that requires specialized respiratory care and/or services. This includes, at a minimum, sufficient numbers of qualified professional staff, established resident care policies and staff trained and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document in the medical record the circumstances leading up to a resident's transfer to the hospital and details of the resident's return to the facility, for one of four residents reviewed for rehospitalizations [Resident (R) #18]. The findings include: Record review revealed R #18 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], and diagnoses included: acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, and encounter for attention to tracheostomy. Review of R #18's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The resident required extensive to total assistance from one or more persons for most activities of daily living, including bed mobility, transfers, dressing, bathing, and personal hygiene. Review of R #18's care plan revealed the following Focus Area (last revised on 3/16/23): - BREATHING DIFFICULTY: [R #18] has potential for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy when staff failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state agency. On the evening of 8/2/23, the facility was made aware Resident #3 said Certified Medication Technician (CMT) D made disrespectful remarks which included CMT told the resident he/she would give the resident something to take (him/her) out of here. This caused the resident to refuse his/her medications that evening. The facility failed to make an initial report and failed to submit a completed investigation of the resident's allegations to the Department of Health and Senior Services within the required time-frames. Fourteen residents were sampled and problems were found with one. The census was 90. Review of the facility Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property, and Injury of Unknown Origin policy, dated 8/17/16 and last revised on 8/1/22, included the following: Prevention and Reporting: 1. The Administrator has primary responsibility in the facility for implementation of the abuse/neglect program; a. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy by failing to complete a thorough investigation for an allegation of abuse. On the evening of 8/3/23, Resident #3 said Certified Medication Technician (CMT) D made disrespectful remarks, and told the resident he/she would give the resident something to take (him/her) out of here. This caused the resident to refuse his/her medications that evening. The facility failed to interview three staff who worked on the unit with CMT D and the resident. Two of the three staff were interviewed by the surveyor. Both said the resident was upset and emotional on the evening of 8/2/23. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) H confirmed the resident cried and CNA I overheard CMT say a disrespectful remark to the resident. This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 90. Review of the facility Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property, and Injury of Unknown Origin policy, dated 8/17/16 and last revised on 8/1/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-09-28 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all staff, including agency staff, were adequately trained and informed of facility policies and expectations per acceptable nursing standards. In addition, key management staff in the facility failed to be knowledgeable about the location of and process for medical record documentation. This failure has the potential to affect all resident in the facility. The census was 85. 1. Review of the State Operations Manual appendix PP, section 483.70(e) revised 11/22/17, Facility Assessment showed: -An assessment of the resident population is the foundation of the facility assessment and determination of the level of sufficient staff needed; -The assessment of the resident population should drive staffing decisions; -Inform the facility about what skills and competencies staff must possess in order to deliver the necessary care required by the residents being served; -The facility's assessment must address/include: -An evaluation of staff competencies that are necessary to provide the level and types of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-09-28 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure certified nurse aides received the required 12 hours of training per year and have a system to track the hours for eight of nine employees reviewed who worked at the facility for over a year. The census was 85. Review of the training records provided by the facility, showed: -Nine certified nurse aides (CNAs) worked at the facility for over a year; -CNA D hired 4/19/11, with 1 hour and 30 minutes of in-service education in the past year; -CNA I hired 9/26/12, with 1 hour of in-service education in the past year; -CNA G hired 9/4/15, with 8 hours and 30 minutes of in-service education in the past year; -CNA F hired 9/5/15, with 8 hours and 15 minutes of in-service education in the past year; -CNA H hired 5/31/17, with 4 hours and 45 minutes of in-service education in the past year; -CNA E hired 6/4/18, with 2 hours and 30 minutes of in-service education in the past year; -CNA K hired 5/1/19, with 5 hours and 15 minutes of in-service education in the past year; -CNA J hired 7/2/19, with 30 minutes of in-service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-09-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to label and date food. The facility failed to check and record refrigerator temperatures and dishwasher chemical levels. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine had an air gap, to prevent backflow from the drain pipe into the ice machine, potentially contaminating the contents of the ice machine. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 85. Observations of the kitchen, showed: -On 9/14/20 at 10:31 A.M.: -Fifteen health shakes in the refrigerator, undated. Dietary Aide Z, said the heath shakes come in frozen and were thawed in the fridge, they should be dated; -A package of hamburger patties, opened and undated; -Two pitchers of tea uncovered; -Three sandwiches with Cheetos, wrapped in plastic wrap, undated, sitting on a tray marked 12/13; -The refrigerator temperature log located on front of the refrigerator, showed dates of 4/2020, the 1st through the 8th, with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-09-28 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a Facility Assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and in emergencies, as required. The lack of a Facility Assessment has the potential to affect the entire resident population. The facility census was 85. Review of the State Operations Manual appendix PP, section 483.70(e) revised 11/22/17, Facility Assessment, showed: -An assessment of the resident population is the foundation of the facility assessment and determination of the level of sufficient staff needed; -It must include the number of residents and the facility's resident capacity; -It must include an evaluation of: -Diseases; -Conditions; -Physical, functional or cognitive limitations of the resident population's; -Acuity (the level of severity of residents' illnesses, physical, mental and cognitive limitations and conditions); -And any other pertinent information about the residents that may affect the services the facility must provide; -The assessment of the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-09-28 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow general acceptable accounting principles by not knowing where the money for closed resident accounts were dispersed to (Residents #301 and #302) and by having negative balances in resident's accounts (Residents #108, #303 and #304). In addition, the facility did not provide quarterly statements to residents (Residents #107, #153, #152, #106 and #207). The facility held funds for at least 44 residents. The census was 85. 1. Record review of Resident #301's trust account, showed he/she expired on [DATE]. The balance in his/her account at that time was $2685.41. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:32 P.M., the business office manager (BOM) said he was not sure where the resident's money went. The balance showed zero. There was no record to show where it went. He was newer in the position and recently started overseeing the resident trust account. When he took over, he noticed there were frozen accounts for residents who had expired, so he closed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-09-28 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or their parties when a resident's fund reached within $200 of the SSI limit ($4,800), for one resident (Resident #308) and failed to ensure a third party liability (TPL), forms were completed for the final accounting for residents who expired. This affected five residents who expired and had money in their account (Resident's #301, #302, #305, #306 and #307). The census was 85. 1. Review of Resident #308's trust account, showed the following: -[DATE], a balance of $7105.24; -[DATE], a balance of $7105.71. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:54 A.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) said he knew the resident was over the limit. He gave the resident a letter but did not keep a copy. He did this the first week he was given the responsibility of overseeing the resident funds in [DATE]. The letter said the resident was over the limit. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:25 A.M., the resident said he/she was not aware of how much…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-09-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the resident's code status listed on the current physician order sheet (POS) matched the advance directive wishes for 12 of 31 residents sampled (Residents #113, #155, #203, #204, #207, #104, #107, #108, #109, #110, #253, and #151). The census was 85. 1. Review of the facilities Advanced Directives policy, revised [DATE], showed: -Advanced Care Directive Policy Statement: Subject to our overall philosophy, the facility will comply with a resident's advanced care directives in pre-determining their health care future, whenever possible, should they become terminally ill and unable to communicate, be in a permanently unconscious state and/or in an emergency situation. The facility will actively seek to obtain information regarding Advanced Directive wishes from each resident. Any existing directive will be reviewed and copied at the time of admission. If none exists, the facility will attempt to determine the wishes of the resident, with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-09-28 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for two of three sampled residents, one who remained in the facility (Resident #118) and one who went home (Resident #117) after discharge from Medicare Part A rehabilitation services. The facility census was 85. 1. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Survey and Certification memo (S&C-09-20), dated 1/9/09, showed the following: -The Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC, form CMS-10123) is issued when all covered Medicare services end for coverage reasons; -If the skilled nursing facility (SNF) believes on admission or during a resident's stay that Medicare will not pay for skilled nursing or specialized rehabilitative services and the provider believes that an otherwise covered item or service may be denied as not reasonable or necessary, the facility must inform the resident or his/her legal representative in writing why these specific services may not be covered and the beneficiary's potential liability for payment for the non-covered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-09-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident rooms, walls, floors, and shower rooms in good repair to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. In addition, the facility failed to provide effective pest control and eliminate offensive odors in a resident use elevator. The census was 85. 1. Observation on all days of survey, from 9/14/20 through 9/18/20, 9/21/20 and 9/22/20, of the resident use elevator located closest to the facility entrance, showed it smelled strongly of mold and gnats were observed on the ceiling. During an interview on 9/16/20 at 8:20 A.M., Resident #151 said the elevator smelled so bad, like you could die taking it. He/she believed the smell was sewage. He/she said the smell is really bad and the elevator shouldn't be used, especially by people with breathing problems. Sometimes, the smell would linger all the way down the hall. During an interview on 9/17/20 at 10:15 A.M., the housekeeping supervisor said she was not aware of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-09-28 · tag F0620 — pattern
    Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an admission policy or implement an admission protocol to ensure accurate accounting of resident's personal belongings to prevent resident liability for possessions if items were missing or stolen, when the facility failed complete and update an inventory list for eight of 31 sampled residents (Residents #104, #110, #201, #204, #251, #256, #253, and #254). The census was 85. 1. Review of the facility's undated admission contract, showed: -The responsible party and/or resident agree as follows: -To be fully responsible for all financial obligations incurred by the Resident, including not limited to, all medical, dental, hospital, and ambulance charges, and any other miscellaneous charges incurred by the Resident; -To provide all necessary personal clothing and effects necessary for good grooming and well-being of the resident; -To provide all spending money for the resident; -To pay such additional monthly charge of the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-09-28 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for three of four sampled newly admitted residents (Residents #251, #204, and #206). The sample was 31. The census was 85. 1. Review of Resident #251's medical record, showed: -A face sheet, with an admission date of 8/13/20; -Physician progress notes, dated 9/1/20 with diagnoses that included: seizures, osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone and bone marrow) to coccyx (tail bone area) wound, multiple strokes with left hemiparesis (weakness or inability to move one side of the body), high blood pressure and urinary catheter; -No baseline care plan. During an interview on 9/15/20 at 10:40 A.M., the resident said that he/she required assistance going to bathroom and moving around in bed. He/she uses the call light for when he/she needs help because he/she cannot move the left side very good. Observation on 9/15/20 at 9:35 A.M., showed the resident required two staff members…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-09-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement, accurate and individualized care plans completed within 21 days of admission, to address the specific needs of the residents, for seven of 31 sampled residents (Residents #108, #153, #155, #154, #202, #251 and #254). The census was 85. 1. Review of Resident #108's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated [DATE], showed: -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate), high blood pressure, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and anxiety; -No behaviors; -Independent with bed mobility; -Required supervision with transfers, dressing, eating, toileting, and hygiene; -Continent of bowel and bladder; -Anti-psychotic, anti-depressant, anti-coagulant, and antibiotics administered in the last seven days. Review of the resident's care plan, dated [DATE], showed: -Focus: Chose to be a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR, no life saving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-09-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice by failing to obtain physician orders for a catheter and a colostomy. In addition, the facility failed to ensure all physician orders were followed by not obtaining weights as indicated and ensuring treatment and therapy orders were followed. For six of 31 sampled residents (Residents #202, #203, #106, #251, #253, and #254). The census was 85. 1. Review of Resident #202's medical record, showed: -admitted [DATE]; -Diagnoses included: Quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), anxiety, high blood pressure, tracheostomy (tube surgically inserted into the trachea for the purpose of breathing) and colostomy (a surgical procedure that brings one end of the large intestine out through the abdominal wall). Review of the resident's physician order sheet (POS), dated 9/1/20 through 9/30/20, showed: -No order for an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder) or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-09-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents by failing to ensure wanderguards (an electronic device used to manage residents who wander by either setting off an alarm when the person wearing the device gets too close to an exit, or locking the exit door) were functioning properly for two of four sampled residents with a wanderguard. In addition, the facility failed to ensure one resident who wandered was assessed for elopement/wandering risk (Residents #115, #108, and #155). The sample was 31. The census was 85. During an interview on 9/22/20 at 10:20 A.M., the administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) said the facility did not have a policy that addressed residents that are elopement risks and the use of the WanderGuard. 1. Review of Resident #115's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 5/9/20, showed: -Severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-09-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place to routinely assess, monitor and document on resident's receiving dialysis (process for removing toxins from the blood for individuals with kidney failure). In addition, the facility failed to have a policy to address the care for residents who require dialysis. The facility identified two residents as receiving routine dialysis treatments, one resident was sampled (Resident #207). The sample was 31. The census was 85. Review of Resident #207's medical record, showed: -admitted : 9/28/17; -Diagnoses included chronic congestive heart failure (CHF, impaired heart function), end stage renal disease (ESRD, chronic irreversible kidney disease), diabetes and high blood pressure. During an interview on 9/14/20 at 11:15 A.M., the resident said he/she goes out for dialysis three times a week. Review of the resident's physician order sheet (POS), dated 9/1/20 through 9/30/20, showed no order for dialysis treatments and no orders for pre and post dialysis assessments. Review of the resident's care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-09-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of record for all controlled drugs with sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation, for five out of five narcotic books reviewed. The census was 85. Review of the facility's controlled drug administration policy, dated 10/2/08, showed controlled substances shall be counted every shift by two licensed personnel to ensure adequate control. When there is a discrepancy in the records, nursing administration shall be notified as soon as possible. 1. Review of the Spectrum/rehab medication cart on 9/15/20 at 9:00 A.M., showed: -A control substance shift change count sheet dated July 2020, which contained the following information: -27 out of 93 shifts with only one nurse signature of the shift change count; -26 out of 93 shifts with no count of narcotics; -A control substance change count dated August 2020, which contained the following information: -27 out of 93 shifts with only one nurse signature of the shift change count; -41 out of 93 shifts with no count of narcotics; -A control substance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-09-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medication regimen reviews (MRR) were completed by a licensed pharmacist on a monthly basis, for 4 out of 4 residents reviewed for completed MRR (Resident #104, #203, #253, and #151). In addition, the Director of Nursing (DON), who is required to receive a copy of all pharmacy recommendations, failed to have knowledge of where pharmacy recommendations were documented. The sample was 31. The census was 85. Review of facility's pharmacy review policy, revised November 2002, showed: -Purpose: To ensure that all pharmacy recommendations are forwarded to the physician for a response in a timely manner; -Policy: All pharmacy recommendations will be forwarded to the physician. A response must be documented within 30 days. Copies of the recommendations will be kept in a separate notebook on each nurse's station for reference; -Procedure: Pharmacy recommendations will be forwarded to the nursing supervisor by the DON when they are received from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-09-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs by failing to thoroughly assess, monitor and document the use of non-pharmacological approaches prior to administration of a psychotropic drug. In addition, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents #104, #108, #206, #204 and #106). The resident sample was 31. The facility census was 85. 1. Review of Resident #104's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 4/11/20, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses included anemia, high blood pressure, peripheral vascular disease (PVD, circulatory disorder), anxiety, depression, manic depression and asthma; -Resident mood interview: -Trouble falling or staying asleep, or sleeping too much: yes; -Feeling tired or having little…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-09-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored per acceptable standards of practice. The facility failed to properly label medications and vaccinations once opened, ensure the medication rooms were locked and controlled medications were locked behind two locks, monitor the medication refrigerator temperature to assure it is maintained at a safe temperature and ensure employee food was not stored in a medication refrigerator for two out of three medication storage rooms and two out of five medication carts observed. The census was 85. Review of the facility's medication storage policy, dated 12/2018, showed: -Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following the manufacture or supplier recommendations; -Procedure: -Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked or attended by person with authorize access: licensed nurses; -External medications including ointments for skin irritations and medication for application to wounds should be kept in treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-09-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview and record review, and in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for COVID-19, the facility failed to protect residents in the facility by not following acceptable infection control practices for COVID-19. In addition, the facility failed to have a process for monitoring and tracking infections (Residents #114 and #119). The resident sample was 31. The census was 85. 1. Review of the CDC, Preparing for COVID-19 in Nursing Homes, updated June 2, 2020, showed: -Given their congregate nature and resident population served (e.g., older adults often with underlying chronic medical conditions), nursing home populations are at high risk of being affected by respiratory pathogens like COVID-19 and other pathogens. As demonstrated by the COVID-19 pandemic, a strong infection prevention and control (IPC) program is critical to protect both residents and healthcare personnel (HCP); -Regularly review CDC's Infection Control Guidance for Healthcare…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-09-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner to protect and promote the rights of the resident when staff failed to provide assistance with a transfer to bed per the resident's request (Resident #114). The sample size was 31. The census was 85. Review of Resident #114's medical record, showed: -Newly admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included stroke, high blood pressure, depression, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Observation and interview on 9/21/20 at 2:00 P.M., showed the resident lay in bed. The resident said a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) had refused to help him/her. He/she forgot the CNA's name. That day started out well. The CNA assisted him/her with getting cleaned up and dressed. He/she did not have any issues. He/she was transferred from the bed to the wheelchair around 9:00 A.M. He/she was given orders from therapy that he/she could sit in the wheelchair as long as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-09-28 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident's ability to safely self-administer their own medications for two residents when staff left medications at the bedside (Residents #111 and #152). The sample was 31. The census was 85. 1. Review of Resident #111's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/13/20, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses included anemia, high blood pressure, renal (kidney) failure, stroke, dementia, malnutrition, anxiety, and asthma; -Required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, toileting, and hygiene. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 4/15/20, showed: -Focus: Dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs related to impaired mobility; -Focus: Impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to impaired decision making; -Interventions: Administer medications as ordered.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-09-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status to prevent weight loss for one resident (Resident #154) when staff failed to follow the facility's weight protocol, dietician recommendations and physician orders for weight monitoring and administration of tube feeding. The resident was dependent on staff to be fed via gastrostomy tube. The sample was 31. The census was 85. Review of the facility's Weight Protocol, undated, last reviewed on 5/28/19, showed: -Purpose: To provide a permanent, accessible record of resident weights; -Procedure: Residents will be weighted within 24 hours upon admission/re-admission by the certified nurse assistant (CNA). Residents will be weighed weekly for four weeks and then monthly ongoing by designated staff; -Monthly weights will be completed by the 5th of the month. Weights will be given to the Director of Nursing (DON) or assistant DON (ADON) to input into the electronic medical record (EMR) within 48…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-09-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory services provided were consistent with professional standards of practice when staff failed to obtain a physician order for oxygen and medication used for breathing and failed to ensure physician orders matched the medication and treatment administration records and failed to care for oxygen concentrators and supplies consistent with professional standards of practice for two residents (Residents #104 and #152). The sample was 31. The census was 85. 1. Review of Resident #104's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 4/11/20, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses include high blood pressure, peripheral vascular disease (PVD, circulatory disorder), anxiety, depression and asthma. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 4/14/20, showed: -Focus: Resident has emphysema (lung disease)/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, lung disease) related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-09-28 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide alternate meals for residents which accommodated resident preference and religious restrictions (Residents #151 and #153). In addition, residents were not offered or served an alternate for breakfast. This had the potential to affect all residents who had alternate preferences for the breakfast meal. The sample was 31. The census was 85. Observations of meal service during the survey, showed: -On 9/14/20 at 10:10 A.M., Dietary Aide Z said there are no breakfast alternates; -On 9/15/20 at 9:00 A.M., the breakfast main entree was biscuits and gravy: -Resident #151 was given only a biscuit, he/she said he/she had no gravy because he/she could not eat pork as part of his/her religious beliefs, no substitute was given or offered; -Resident #153, unable to eat pork as part of his/her religious beliefs, was provided oatmeal. No meat alternate given or offered; -On 9/22/20 at 9:08 A.M., the breakfast meal had a main entree of biscuits and gravy. Resident #151 was given a biscuit only with no gravy. No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-09-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep resident records that were complete, readily accessible and systematically organized when the facility administration failed to be aware that weights, medication regimen reviews, dietary recommendations, and assessments were included in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR). This resulted in a failure to follow-up on recommendations, failure to properly monitor weights for one resident (Resident #154) and failure to ensure assessments and pharmacy reviews were completed as indicated for all residents sampled. The sample was 31. The census was 85. 1. During an interview on 9/14/20 at 9:48 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) and administrator said the only information that is in the EMR were the census and resident demographics. They had not had the chance to document any resident information in the electronic medical record. All resident information is found in the hard chart at the nurse's station. 2. Review of Resident #154's hard chart, showed no registered dietician notes or recommendations. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-09-28 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a member of the facility's interdisciplinary team who is responsible for working with hospice representatives to coordinate care. In addition, the facility failed to maintain the most recent hospice plan of care, hospice election form, physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness, the names and contact information for hospice personnel involved in hospice care of each resident and failed to ensure that each resident's written plan of care includes both the most recent hospice plan of care and a description of the services furnished by the facility to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, for one resident not identified by the facility as receiving hospice services (Resident #155). The sample was 31. The census was 85. Review of Resident #155's face sheet, showed admitted on [DATE]; Review of the resident's physician order sheet (POS), showed: -Dated 7/1/20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-04-24 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to make accessible for examination, the results of the most recent survey, certifications, and complaint investigations of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility available to residents, visitors, and resident representatives. The sample was 20. The census was 89. Review of the facility's Resident [NAME] of Rights, showed the facility shall retain and make available for public inspection at the facility to facility personnel, residents, their families or legal representatives and the general public, a list of names, addresses and occupations of all individuals who have a property interest in the facility as well as a complete copy of each official notification from the division of aging of violations, deficiencies, licensure approval, disapprovals, or a combination of these, and responses. This includes, as a minimum, statements of deficiencies, copies of plans of correction, acceptance or rejection notice regarding the plans of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-10-13 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, interview with the Regional Ombudsman, and record review, the facility failed to provide a notice of transfer/discharge to one of four residents reviewed for rehospitalization [Resident (R) #87]. The facility also failed to provide copies of transfer/discharge notices to the Regional Ombudsman for all four residents reviewed for rehospitalization (R #18, R #87, R #90, and R #97), as well as 131 additional residents who were transferred/discharged between 5/1/23 and 10/12/23. The findings include: The facility policy titled ROOM CHANGES, TRANSFERS,AND DISCHARGES [sic], reviewed April 2022, stated: PROTOCOL - Transfers and discharges will be conducted according to State and Federal regulations. PROCEDURE - Notification: The facility will provide residents/patients with a 30-day written notice of an impending discharge from the facility, except in an emergency or where otherwise exempted by statue [sic], rule, or regulation wherein notice will be given as soon as practicable. The Notice of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-10-13 · tag F0625 — widespread
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a notice of the facility's Bedhold Policy at the time of transfer to four of four residents reviewed for rehospitalization [Resident (R) #18, R #87, R #90, and R #97]. The findings include: The facility's undated policy titled Bed Hold Policy, undated, stated: When a resident goes on a temporary leave of absence from the facility due to a hospital stay or an approved therapeutic leave; the resident has an option to 'hold the bed' either through the Medicaid system, if applicable, or with private pay funds. If a resident chooses not to pay a bed-hold, they will be considered 'discharged .' As determined by the facility, the 'discharged ' resident may be directed to remove and/ or have their personal property stored; thereby making the resident's room available for another admission. If a Medicaid resident does not privately pay for a bed-hold day after the depletion of such days, they will be readmitted to the first available…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$105,665 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $57,899 — penalty dated 2024-10-21
  • $33,248 — penalty dated 2024-07-23
  • $14,518 — penalty dated 2023-12-22
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-01-07 for 50 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHESTNUT HOLDINGS GROUP LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2020
BRECHER, MENDELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER65%since 03/01/2020
LICHTMAN, CHANAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2020
ZIMMERMAN, JACOBIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2020
CIBC BANK USAOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 03/01/2020
ANDERSON, DENNISIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 03/01/2020
SCHUETTLER, MELISSAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 03/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$603K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 81%Medicare 9%Other / private 10%

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $603K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$258per resident / day
operating cost
$7,828per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$257per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265331. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next