Friendship Village Sunset Hills

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 236 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 81 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 130.6 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.95 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.67 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents was free from physical abuse by an agency Certified Nurse Aide (CNA). Review of a video, showed on the morning of 3/17/24, agency CNA A stood at Resident #1's bedside. He/She had one hand behind the resident's neck and with the other, pulled on the resident's leg towards a sitting position. The resident hit the CNA. With his/her right hand, CNA A punched the resident in the neck. He/She then loudly said, Stop. Why did you do that? The census was 136. On 04/12/24 9:49 A.M., the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance immediate jeopardy (IJ) which occurred on 03/17/24. On 03/17/24, the administrator was notified of the incident and an investigation was started. CNA A was sent home and placed on the do not return list. Facility staff received education on Freedom from Abuse and Neglect. The IJ was corrected on 3/18/24. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Resident Property Policy, dated 10/2022, showed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents, who had a change in condition, was monitored and assessed, according to professional standards, by a licensed nurse throughout the night. The resident was sent to the hospital the next morning, intubated (tube inserted through the mouth and into the lungs so the person can be placed on a ventilator to assist with breathing) in the emergency room (ER) for respiratory failure (a condition in which the blood does not have enough oxygen), and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation (an irregular and rapid heartbeat) and septic shock (the most severe complication of sepsis and carries a high mortality) (Resident #2). The census was 129. Review of the facility's Acute Change of Condition policy, dated 8/2019, showed: -It is the policy of this facility to promptly identify, evaluate, and address a resident's change in condition, and to: -Immediately notify the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity, in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life when staff failed to serve a requested alternate meal and told the resident to wait until the next meal (Resident #91), failed to serve a resident timely after the tablemates were served (Resident #109). The facility staff also failed to answer a resident after asking staff several times (Resident #44) and staff entered the resident rooms without knocking on the door (Residents #67, #102 and #110). The sample was 26. The census was 132. Review of the facility's Resident Rights: Accommodation of Needs and Preferences and Homelike Environment policy, dated August 2019, showed: -It is the policy of the facility to identify and provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health and safety of the resident or other residents. Residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-28 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each nurse aide had no less than twelve hours of in-service education per year based on their individual performance review and calculated by their employment date rather than the calendar year, for eight of 10 sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) and Certified Medication Technicians (CMT). The census was 132. Review of the facility's Compliance Education and Training Policy, dated 7/1/2019, showed: -Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to standardize the requirements for initial orientation, ongoing training, focus training, and corrective training in order to educate employees and non- employees on compliance with laws regulations and facility policies and procedures, and to promote accountability; -Policy statement: The facility requires that all employees receive training on compliance with laws, regulations, facility policies and procedures, and standards of conduct. Non-employees including board members, vendor representatives, contractors, students, and volunteers who regularly work at the facility or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records for all controlled drugs with sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for ten out of ten narcotic count books reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents with controlled substance orders. The census was 132. Review of the facility's Controlled Substances policy, original date 8/19, showed: It is the policy of Friendship Village to ensure compliance with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of Schedule II and other controlled substances. -Only authorized licensed nurses that are permanent employees of Friendship Village or pharmacy personnel shall have access to Schedule II controlled drugs maintained on premises. *No agency nurse is allowed to carry narcotic keys or administer narcotics to any resident. -Controlled substances must be counted upon delivery. The nurse receiving the order must count the controlled substances together with Shift Supervisor. Both individuals must sign the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors. Staff failed to administer a medication for one resident with a diagnosis of obstructive uropathy (occurs when urine flow is blocked, causing urine to build up in the kidneys) who required the medication to empty their bladder and increase urination (Resident #29). Staff failed to administer several doses of a medication used to treat anxiety for one resident (Resident #110). Staff also administered an expired medication, used to treat Parkinson's disease (an age-related degenerative brain condition) for over a week. The medication was ordered to be given twice a day. The bottle showed the medication expired October 2024 (Resident #227). These failures put residents at risk for significant medication errors that went undetected and unreported to the physician, resulting in potential for compilations related to missed doses and administering expired medications. The sample…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were updated and accurate to reflect resident needs. This failure affected three of four sampled residents, whose care plan did not identify self-harm (Resident #96) sexual behaviors (Resident #109) and hospice services (Resident #29). The sample was 26. The census was 132. Review of the facility's Care Planning policy, dated August 2019, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of the facility for the Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team to develop and to implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for each resident to meet the resident's preferences and goals, and to address medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment; -A comprehensive care plan for each resident is developed within seven days of completion of the comprehensive resident assessment; -The resident's care plan must be reviewed after each Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) assessment, except…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive care consistent with professional standards. Staff failed to complete a documented assessment and documented notifications to the physician and family regarding a resident's knee wound. Staff also failed to obtain a physician's order for a dressing to the resident's right knee (Resident #110). The sample size was 26. The census was 132. Review of the facility's Prevention and Treatment of Skin Breakdown policy, dated 8/2019, showed: -Policy: It is the policy to properly identify and assess residents whose clinical conditions increase the risk for impaired skin integrity, and pressure injuries; To implement preventative measures; and to provide appropriate treatment modalities for wounds according to the industry standards of care. -Procedure: Monitoring of skin integrity. Skin will be observed daily with care by the nursing assistant. If any skin concerns are noted, they are to be reported immediately to the designated nurse. Weekly skin audits on the bath or shower day will be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 30 opportunities observed, four errors occurred, resulting in a 13.33% error rate (Residents #60 and #98). Staff did not measure a medication in powder form on a level surface, provided a bottle of nasal spray to a resident and did not stop the resident at the ordered doses, crushed a medication that should not have been crushed and left crushed medications unattended on the medication cart. The census was 132. Review of the facility's Medication Administration, policy dated 8/19, showed: -Purpose: To clearly define Drug Administration policies in accordance with all applicable laws and standards of practice. Review of the facility's Crushing Medications policy, dated 8/19, showed: -Purpose: To enable the resident who has difficulty swallowing to take medications orally. Review of the facility's Medications Not to be Crushed list, revised 7/19, showed: -Ezetimibe (to treat high cholesterol) tablet not be crushed due to manufacturers recommendation. 1.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided therapeutic diets as recommended by the physician and the Registered Dietician (RD), for one resident with weight loss (Resident #109). The facility failed to provide the resident's fortified chocolate milk for two observed meals. The facility also failed to provide the extra items listed on the meal ticket. The sample was 26. The census was 132. Review of Resident #109's admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Uses wheelchair for mobility; -Weight: 163 pounds (lbs); -Supervision or touching assistance for eating (Helper provides cues or touching/steadying assistance as resident completes activity); -Diagnoses include acid reflux, diabetes, malnutrition, dementia and depression. Review of the resident's current care plan, showed: -Problem: Resident has potential for cognitive impairment; -Interventions: None listed -Goal: Resident's nutritional status will remain stable as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable standards of practice for infection prevention and control when staff failed use proper hand hygiene while providing care for two of three sampled residents observed for incontinence care (Residents #110 and #44). The census was 132. Review of the facility's Hand Hygiene policy, dated 8/19, showed: -Purpose: hand hygiene is required in order to reduce the spread of potentially dangerous infectious agents and to reduce the risk of colonization or infection for health care workers that could be potentially acquired from the resident; -Policy Statement: It is the policy of this facility that hand hygiene will be provided consistent with best practices. Hand hygiene (hand washing and/or alcohol based hand rub (ABHR) includes the use of ABHR instead of soap and water in all clinical situations except when the hands are visibly soiled (blood or bodily fluids) or after caring for a resident with known or suspected Clostridium…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-09-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain 3 of 3 ice and water dispensers in the first, second, and third-floor beverage areas used for residents and staff. This had the potential to affect all 131 residents who resided in the facility at the time of the survey. Findings included: Review of the Nugget Ice Machines Installation, Operation and Maintenance Manual, revised in December 2017, indicated, If the ice machine requires more frequent cleaning and sanitizing, consult a qualified service company to test the water quality and recommend appropriate water treatment. If required, an extremely dirty ice machine may be taken apart for cleaning and sanitizing. Sanitizing procedure indicated Note: Sanitizing must be performed on adjacent surface areas not contacted by the water distribution system. Step 5 Remove the top cover to the ice chute and pour the sanitizer/water solution into the evaporator. Step 6 Replace the ice chute cover and allow the ice machine to stand for 30 minutes. Review of the facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,433 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-04-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $977K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO