St Louis Altenheim
5408 South Broadway, Saint Louis, MO 63111 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 73 certified beds · (314) 353-7225 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.7% | 18.1% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.7% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.2% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 4.1% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.8% | 25.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.7% | 90.9% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 4.5% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.6% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 25.7% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.34 | 2.11 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.33 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
CMS has not published payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours for this facility yet — this can happen for newer, hospital-based, or recently-certified homes. It can also mean the home simply did not file, which CMS does not distinguish in this data, so treat the gap as unexplained rather than benign. Staffing is one of the three parts of the CMS star rating; where it’s missing, weigh the independent health-inspection score most, and ask the facility directly about its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
10 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents when the facility failed to address a large water stain on the ceiling of one resident's room and bathroom (Resident #41). The facility also failed to ensure lights were in working order for one hallway on the 300 unit. The census was 47.1. Review of Resident #41's medical record, showed his/her diagnoses included arthritis, anxiety, depression and diabetes. Observation and interview on 10/7/25 at 11:10 A.M., showed the resident lay in bed. He/She said he/she has no concerns except for the underside of the soffit next to his/her television. There was a dark brown stain on the under part of the soffit that has a spider web type shape and extends approximately 6 inches long and 18 inches wide. The resident said he/she was sitting in bed when it happened and was told a shower overflowed upstairs. The resident told the facility about the stain. It has been a little bit since he/she reported it and he/she wants it fixed. The spot is a focus when he/she lays in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to obtain treatment orders timely and thoroughly document a new skin issue for one resident (Resident # 34) found with an untreated wound. The sample was 12. The facility census was 47.Review of the facility's, Pressure Ulcer/Skin Breakdown- Clinical Protocol Policy, dated April 2018, showed:-The nursing staff and practitioner will assess and document an individual's significant risk factors for developing pressure ulcers (injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue, as a result of pressure or friction); for example, immobility, recent weight loss, and a history of pressure ulcer(s);-In addition, the nurse shall describe and document/report the following:a. Full assessment of pressure sore including location, stage, length, width and depth, presence of exudates (drainage) or necrotic (dead) tissue;b. Pain assessment;c. Resident's mobility status;d. Current treatments, including support surfaces; ande. All active diagnoses.-The staff and practitioner will examine the skin of newly admitted residents for evidence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents when staff failed to follow facility policy regarding resident alcohol storage. One resident had several bottles of drinking alcohol, four mini wine bottles and a 16 ounce (oz) open beer in his/her mini fridge (Resident #25). The census was 47. The sample was 12.Review of the facilities Alcoholic Beverages Policy revised February 2023, showed purpose: This procedure is to establish uniform guidelines concerning the administration of alcoholic beverages.-A physician's order must be received before any alcoholic beverages may be administered to a resident;-Should such an order be received, the nurse supervisor receiving the order must contact the pharmacist to determine if any of the residents' current medications would interact with alcohol. Should there be a medication that would interact with alcohol the nurse supervisor must inform the physician of such medication;-Alcoholic beverages must be paid for by the resident, his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents' personal refrigerators had routine temperature tracking (Residents #1 and #30). The facility also failed to ensure the kitchen ceiling above the food preparation station was free from dust accumulation and failed to ensure the walk- in freezer was free from ice buildup. The sample was 12. The census was 47. Review of the facility's sanitation policy, revised 11/22, showed:-Policy statement: the food service area is maintained in a clean and sanitary manner;-Policy implementation: all kitchens, kitchen areas and dining areas are kept clean, free from garbage and debris, and protected from rodents and insects. All utensils, counters, shelves and equipment are kept clean, maintained in good repair and are free from breaks, corrosions, open seams, cracks and chipped areas that may affect their use or proper cleaning. Seals, hinges and fasteners are kept in good repair. 1. Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide resident(s) the right to be informed and make choices about their care, when staff failed to inform a resident with dementia of the care to be provided and stop providing care when he/she yelled stop. Staff continued to provide care and mimicked or repeated residents' words the resident said during this time (Resident #35). The sample was 12. The census was 47. Review of the facility's Resident's Right Policy, dated February 2021, showed employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect and dignity. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the residents' right to:-A dignified existence;-Be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity;-Be supported by the facility in exercising his or her rights. Review of the facility's orientation and in-service training programs showed residents' rights training conducted quarterly to assist staff in understanding the residents' rights. Review of Resident #35's quarterly change Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident was free from abuse when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) hit a resident on the arm (Resident #4). The sample was 12. The census was 47. Review of the facility's abuse/neglect policy, revised 9/2022, showed:-Policy statement: All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported;-Policy implementation: If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/27/25, showed:-Severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) accurately reflected the resident's status of having a life expectancy of less than 6 moths when they received hospice services (a service provided when a resident has a condition indicating a life expectancy of less than 6 months as certified by the hospice physician) for one of two residents investigated for hospice services (Resident #20). The census was 47. Review of Resident #20's medical record, showed:-Diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, diabetes, dementia, and major depressive disorder.-A Hospice Comprehensive assessment showed a hospice start of care date of 7/29/24 and current benefit dates 7/24/25-9/21/25.-The current certification of terminal illness dated 9/22/25-11/20/25. Review of the resident's care plan, revised on 8/21/24, showed:-Focus: Resident is receiving hospice services with the admitting diagnosis of late…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care needs were met for a dependent resident. The facility failed to ensure the resident received assistance in the dining room during meals and failed to ensure the resident's hands and nails were cleaned (Resident #4). The sample was 14. The census was 47. Review of the facility's ADL policy, revised 3/2018, showed:-Policy Statement: residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out ADLs. Residents who are unable to carry out ADL independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene;-Policy implementation: appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care), mobility (transfer and ambulation, including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control standards while providing perineal care for one resident (Resident #30). The sample was 12. The census was 47.Review of the facility's Perineal Care Policy, revised February 2018, showed:-Purpose: The purposes of this procedure are to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infections and skin irritation, and to observe the resident's skin condition.-Preparation:--Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident.--Assemble the equipment and supplies as needed.-Equipment and Supplies-The following equipment and supplies will be necessary when performing this procedure:--Wash basin;--Towels;--Washcloth;--Soap (or other authorized cleansing agent); and--Personal protective equipment (e.g., gowns, gloves, mask, etc., as needed).-Steps in the Procedure:--Place the equipment on the bedside stand. Arrange the supplies so they can be easily reached;--Wash and dry your hands thoroughly;--Fill the wash basin one-half (1/2) full of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-10 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was free from pests. The sample was 12. The census was 47. Review of the facility's pest control logs, showed:-On 9/25/25, the pest control company treated the facility and observed insects in the kitchen;-On 10/6/25 the pest control company changed out the facility pest traps. Observation on 10/7/25, of the kitchen, showed:-At 10:41 A.M., multiple flies flew around the bulk bin area. Observation on 10/9/25, of the kitchen, showed:-At 9:28 A.M., multiple flies near the clean pots and pans;-At 9:41 A.M., a beetle crawled on the ground next to the oven. During an interview on 10/10/25 at 8:43 A.M., Dietary Aide S said the kitchen has insects and a pest control company comes to spray. During an interview on 10/10/25 at 8:48 A.M., the Dietary Director said he expected the kitchen to be free from insects. He said a pest control company comes out to spray and treat the kitchen around once a month. During an interview on 10/10/25 at 10:14 A.M., the Administrator said she expected the kitchen to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MALIK ST LOUIS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2025 |
| MALIK, OMER | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2025 |
| MALIK, SHAFIQ | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2025 |
| FORVIS MAZARS LLP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2025 |
| BARDWELL, JEAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2025 |
| HABIBULLAH, AYAAZ | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265892. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-10-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.