Seville Care Center
35625 Highway 72, Salem, MO 65560 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 90 certified beds · (573) 729-6142 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569, F0570)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 30.6% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.6% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.8% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.9% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.8% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 46.6% | 17.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 34.5% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 86.5% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.8% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.7% | 17.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 29.6% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 5.9% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 39.1% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.31 | 2.11 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 5.61 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 45.4 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to develop and implement complete policies and procedures for inspection, testing and maintenance of the facility's water systems to inhibit the growth of waterborne pathogens and reduce the risk of an outbreak of Legionnaire's Disease, a serious type of pneumonia caused by Legionella bacteria. Failure to develop and implement complete policies and procedures for the inspection, testing and maintenance of the facility's water systems has the potential for failure of staff to identify and mitigate the presence of waterborne pathogens, which places all residents at risk of exposure which could lead to illness. The facility census was 45. 1. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), QSO-17-30, dated 06/02/17 and revised 07/06/18, showed: -CMS expects Medicare and Medicare/Medicaid certified healthcare facilities to have water management policies and procedures to reduce the risk of growth and spread of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in building water systems;-Facilities must…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide an appropriate emergency discharge notice when staff discharged one resident (Resident #1) to the hospital and refused to allow the resident to return to the facility. The facility census was 45.1.Review of the facility's Making and Emergency Transfer or Discharge policy, revised April 2007, showed staff are directed to only make an emergency discharge when it is in the best interest of the residents. To make an emergency discharge the facility will implement the following procedures:-Notify the residents attending physician;-Notify the receiving facility that the transfer is being made;-Prepare the resident for transfer;-Prepare a transfer form to send with the resident;-Notify the representative and other family members;-Assist in transportation.2. Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 3/16/26, showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE], and facility staff discharged him/her to the hospital 3/3/26.Review of the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to prevent misappropriation of money from one resident, (Resident #1), out of five sampled residents, when the Director of Nursing (DON) stole $1700.00 from the resident, without the resident's consent. The facility census was 48. The administrator was notified on 12/10/25 of past Non-Compliance which occurred on 12/05/25. On 12/05/25, the administrator investigated and notified the police department of the theft. The administrator terminated the DON on 12/05/25; in-serviced all staff on the facility's abuse, neglect, and misappropriation policies on 12/05/25; and reimbursed the resident $1700.00. 1. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation Policy, updated 12/15/12, showed residents have the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion, and it is the facility's responsibility to prevent not only abuse, but also those practices and omissions, neglect and misappropriation of property, that if left unchecked, lead to abuse. Review showed misappropriation of resident property…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to notify two resident's (Resident #2 and #3's) physician out of three sampled residents after staff documented they assessed the residents with abnormal blood pressure (BP) readings. The facility's census was 46.1. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy in regard to vital signs (measurements of the body's basic functions to include blood pressure). Review of the facility's Significant Condition Change and Notification policy, undated, showed: -The purpose is to ensure that the resident's family and/or representative and medical practitioner are notified of resident changes such as a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status;-Examples include a significant change in/or unstable vital signs, other abnormal assessment findings;-The medical practitioner will be contacted immediately for any emergencies regardless of the time of day. Non-emergency notifications may be made the next morning if the situation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to keep one resident (Resident #1) free from verbal and emotional abuse when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A yelled at the resident to shut up multiple times, directly in his/her face. The facility census was 50. The administrator was notified on 4/25/25 of past Non-Compliance, which occurred on 4/09/25 when staff reported the allegation. Staff immediately suspended LPN A pending the results of the investigation, assessed the resident for physical and psychological harm, conducted an investigation, in-serviced staff on abuse and neglect, and terminated the employee on 4/09/25. 1. Review of the facility's Abuse, Prevention and Prohibition policy, dated 11/2018, showed the facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect, or abuse of residents. Review showed abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. This includes the deprivation by an individual, to include a caretaker of goods or services that are necessary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to develop an abuse and neglect policy which met the required time frame to report immediately, but not later than two hours after an allegation of abuse or neglect. The facility census was 49. 1. Review of the facility's Policy & Procedure Abuse and Neglect Prevention policy, revised on 02/15/2012, showed: -The resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, and physical, and mental abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion; -Once the facility administration becomes aware of any of these alleged violations, the home must report immediately to the designated state agency, CMS indicates that the term immediately means as soon as possible, but no more than 24-hours after the alleged incident is discovered. The facility's policy did not include direction the facility is required to report all alleged violations-immediately but not later than, two hours- if the alleged violation involves abuse or results in serious bodily injury, 24 hours if the alleged violation does not involve abuse and does not result…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice when staff did not contact the physician for a pain medication refill order in a timely manner for one resident (Resident#30) of one sampled resident. Facility staff failed to follow physician orders when staff did not document the administration of medications and tube feedings for one resident (Resident #45). Staff failed to complete and document neurological checks for three (Resident #1, #18, and #30) of six sampled residents who had unwitnessed falls, as directed by the facility policy. The facility's census was 49. 1. Review of the facility's policy, Physicians Medication Orders, revised April 2010, showed drugs and biologicals that are required to be refilled must be reordered from the issuing pharmacy not less then three days prior to the last dosage being administered to ensure refills are readily available. 2. Review of Resident #30's Quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week. The facility census was 49. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed the facility did not provide a policy for RN coverage. 2. Review of the facility's RN staff schedule, dated July 2024, showed the facility did not have an RN, eight consecutive hours a day, in the building for the dates on: -Thursday 07/04/24; -Friday 07/05/24; -Saturday 07/06/24; -Sunday 07/07/24; -Wednesday 07/10/24; -Saturday 07/13/24; -Sunday 07/14/24; -Monday 07/15/24; -Tuesday 07/16/24; -Saturday 07/20/24; -Sunday 07/21/24; -Saturday 07/27/24; -Sunday 07/28/24. 3. Review of the facility's RN staff schedule, dated August 2024, showed the facility did not have an RN, eight consecutive hours a day, in the building for the dates on: -Saturday 08/03/24; -Thursday 08/08/24; -Saturday 08/10/24; -Sunday 08/11/24; -Thursday 08/15/24; -Friday 08/16/24; -Saturday 08/17/24; -Sunday 08/18/24; -Monday 08/19/24; -Thursday 08/22/24; -Saturday…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, facility staff failed to properly complete weekly skin assessments, and failed to notifiy the physician and obtain a treatment order for one resident (Resident #6) of one sampled resident who developed a new facility-acquired pressure ulcer to the resident's right buttock. The facility's census was 49. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Pressure Ulcer/Pressure Injury Prevention, dated April 2018, showed, if a pressure ulcer/pressure injury is present, provide treatment to heal it and prevent development of additional pressure ulcers/pressure injuries. 2. Review of the facility's policy titled, Wound Assessment, dated April 2018, showed the facility is to assess each wound initially at the time of admission or at the time the wound is identified, and each wound will be assessed weekly thereafter or with any significant noted change in the wound. The wound assessment and documentation should include: -Anatomic location includes anatomic landmarks; -Size-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one resident (Resident #2) out of two sampled resident care plans, when the resident wandered into another resident room. The facility census was 51. 1. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plan policy, dated 02/01/24, showed staff are directed as follows: -The Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, Coordinator or designee shall act in a case management role by knowledge of ongoing care needs; -The policy did not contain direction or guidance when the care plan should be updated when changes in resident care is observed. 2. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 08/29/24, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Cognitively impaired; -Used a wheelchair; -Inattentive, had disorganized thinking and wandered; -Diagnosis of dementia and anxiety. Review of resident's Wandering Assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) out of three residents were allowed to make choices about aspects of their lives when staff did not allow the resident who is his/her own responsible party and assessed to smoke a cigarette independently as a consequence for his/her behavior. The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, undated, showed residents have the right to a dignified existence and self-determination. Review of the facility's smoking policy, dated 01/08/23, showed: -Resident's will be assessed at the time of admission and reassessed at a minimum quarterly or with a significant change to determine the level of assistance and supervision required to ensure resident safety; -Resident's who are determined by the care plan team to be able to smoke without supervision may smoke at-will in the designated smoking area only; -Any and all residents that are not deemed capable of smoking unsupervised, will be given the opportunity to smoke with supervision at the facility's designated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, facility staff failed to notify the physician in a timely manner for one resident (Resident #1) who stated he/she felt like harming himself/herself. The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring, dated February 2023, showed staff were directed to do the following: -Any resident with a behavior that has been identified would present a potential danger to either himself/herself or other residents will be placed on increased visual monitoring, unless other immediate interventions are needed; -The charge nurse will notify the attending physician and family of the behavior. 2. Review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 10/22/23, showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -Cognitively intact; -Did not exhibit signs of feeling down, depressed or hopeless or thoughts he/she would be better of dead, or of hurting themselves in some way; -Diagnosis of depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to serve food in accordance with the nutritionally calculated menus and standardized recipes. The facility census was 44. 1. Observation on 11/13/23 at 12:15 P.M., showed [NAME] N served residents the noon meal per the Week one, Day two preplanned menu. Observation also showed -regular menu listed baked mostaccioli serving size as a six ounce spoodle, staff served the entree using a four ounce spoodle -regular menu listed apple crisp serving size as a #6 dip (5.33 ounces), staff served the fruit using a four ounce spoodle -pureed menu listed baked mostaccioli serving size as a #6 dip, staff served the pureed entree using a #8 dip (four ounces) -pureed menu listed italian vegetables serving size as a #12 dip (2.67 ounces), staff served the pureed vegetables using a #8 dip (four ounces) -pureed menu listed apple crisp serving size as a #6 dip, staff served the pureed entree using a #16 dip (two ounces) -pureed menu listed bread serving size as a #20 dip (1.6 ounces), staff served the pureed entree using a #8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to maintain kitchen exhaust fans, lighting devices and ceiling surfaces in a clean sanitary manner to prevent the potential for cross-contamination. The facility census was 44. 1. Observation of the kitchen on 11/13/23 at 11:05 A.M., showed: -The ceiling above the three part sink had a large unfinished, repaired area. Observation showed the gypsum wallboard was unpainted and the joints were not taped or sealed, leaving gaps in the ceiling. Observation also showed the patched area was not flush and large areas hung below the ceiling level, exposing gypsum material; -Two ceiling exhaust fans had large accumulations of dust and grease; Six fluorescent tube light fixtures had missing covers, exposing twelve light bulbs; During an interview on 11/14/23 at 11:05 A.M., the dietary manager said the dietician told him/her about dirty kitchen exhaust fans and broken light covers in the resident dining room. The dietary manager said the dietician did not mention the missing light covers in the kitchen. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to create an environment respectful of the rights of each resident to make choices about significant aspects of their lives for five residents (Residents #21, #24, #25, #34 and #43), when facility staff did not honor residents dietary preferences. The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident's Rights, dated Month 2009, showed staff employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. Residents are entitled to exercise their rights and privileges to the fullest extent possible. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Food Preferences, dated December 2008, showed the Dietician will visit residents periodically to determine if revisions are needed regarding food preferences. The nursing staff will inform the kitchen about resident requests. The Food Services Department will offer a limited number of food substitutes for individuals who do not want to eat the primary meal. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for residents, when staff failed to maintain walls, floors, doors, door frames, lighting devices, and an effective pest control program. The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the policies provided by the facility did not contain a policy for environmental concerns. 2. Observations on 11/13/23 and 11/14/23 during the Life Safety Code tour showed: -a broken hall light cover outside resident room [ROOM NUMBER]; -a large accumulation of dead insects in the hall light between resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]; -a large brown stain on the ceiling outside resident room [ROOM NUMBER]; -a broken light cover outside resident room [ROOM NUMBER]; -a missing hall light cover between resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]; -a cracked hall light cover outside resident room [ROOM NUMBER]; -a large unfinished ceiling patch over the North nurse station; -a large accumulation of dead insects in the hall light between resident rooms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for four residents (Resident #7, #30, #41, and #46). The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the policies provided by the facility did not contain a policy for baseline care plans. 2. Review of Resident #7's medical record showed staff documented the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Additional review showed the record did not contain a baseline care plan. 3. Review of Resident #30's medical record showed staff documented the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Additional review showed the record did not contain a baseline care plan. 4. Review of Resident #41's medical record showed staff documented the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Additional review showed the record did not contain a baseline care plan. 5. Review of Resident #46's medical record showed staff documented the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Additional review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure eight residents (Residents #5, #7, #11, #23, #32, #34, #36 and #37), who were unable to complete their own activities of daily living (ADLs), received the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene. The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the policies provided by the facility did not contain a policy for ADLs. 2. Review of Resident #5's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 08/31/23, showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Did not reject care; -Dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, dressing, bed mobility and transfers; -Always incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Diagnosis of dementia (progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change, resulting from organic disease of the brain). Review of resident's care plan, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide a 14-day stop date for as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications (any drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts or perceptions), for three residents (Residents #6, #30, and #41). The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the policies provided by the facility did not contain a policy for psychotropic medications. 2. Review of Resident #6's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 9/18/23, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), Dementia (progressive and persistent of intellectual functioning, with impairment in memory and abstract thinking), Anxiety Disorder (feeling of worry, anxiety, or fear strong enough to interfere with daily function), Depression and Psychotic Disorder (disconnection from reality). Review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide a safe mechanical lift transfer for one resident (Resident #8) and failed to keep residents safe while smoking by not implementing smoking interventions and utilizing smoking assistive devices for two residents (Resident #34 and #36). The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Lifting Machine, Using a Portable, dated 10/10, showed staff were directed to do the following: -To transfer a resident from a bed to a chair, you should position the resident comfortably in the chair, grasp the top of the sling with one hand and pull back on the sling while lowering the resident into the chair. -Review showed it did not contain direction for staff to guide the resident while using the machine or the positioning of the legs of the machine. 2. Review of Resident #8's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 06/18/23, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Did not contain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement complete policies and procedures for the inspection, testing and maintenance of the facility water systems to inhibit growth of waterborne pathogens and reduce the risk of an outbreak of Legionnaire's Disease (LD). Additionally, facility staff failed to remove soiled gloves and/or properly wash hands during incontinence care for two residents (Resident #8 and #25) to prevent the spread of bacteria and other infection causing contaminants. The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality, Safety and Oversight memo (QSO-17-30- Hospitals/CAHs/NHs), revised 7/06/18 showed: In manmade water systems, Legionella can grow and spread to susceptible hosts, such as persons who are at least [AGE] years old, smokers, and those with underlying medical conditions such as chronic lung disease or immunosuppression. Legionella can grow in parts of building water systems that are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to conduct inspections of bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program for two residents (Resident #8 and #20) to identify areas of possible entrapment. The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) document entitled, Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment, dated March 10, 2006, showed 413 people died as a result of entrapment events in the United States. Further review showed those among the most vulnerable for these entrapment type events are elderly patients and residents, especially those who are frail, confused, restless, or who have uncontrolled body movement. Review of the FDA document entitled, Practice Hospital Bed Safety, dated February 2013 identifies seven different potential, zones of entrapment. This guidance characterizes the head, neck, and chest as key body parts that are at risk of entrapment. Review of the FDA document entitled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-09-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, facility staff failed to properly maintain the temperature of hot food at or above 120 Degrees Fahrenheit (°F) and cold foods at or below 41° F for for 9 residents (Resident #5, #16,#17,#25, #28, #29, #31, #35, and #494) at the time of meal service and failed to implement a system of monitoring food temperatures at the time of service. Failure to maintain foods at the proper temperature has the potential to affect all residents who received room trays. Further, staff failed to serve palatable food to residents. The facility census was 42. 1. Review of the facility's Meal Service Temperatures policy dated, revised January 2017, showed staff were directed as follows: -Meal temperatures shall be monitored by the dietary manager and the cooks on a daily basis. Hot food shall be cooked or heated to a temperature above 165 degrees. Cold food shall be chilled to a temperature below 40 degrees. 2. Observation on 9/15/22 at 8:36 A.M., showed staff delivered a covered hall tray to Resident #5's room. The tray contained fried eggs that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene as often as necessary to prevent cross-contamination. Facility staff failed to allow sanitized dishes to air dry prior to stacking in storage to prevent the growth of food-borne pathogens. Facility staff failed to appropriately wash and sanitize manually washed kitchenware to prevent cross-contamination. Facility staff failed ensure kitchen waste containers were covered when not in actual use to deter the attraction of pests and rodents. Facility staff failed to prepare pureed food items in accordance with standardized recipes to ensure pureed foods served to four residents (Residents #11, #12 #15 and #34) were reheated to an internal temperature of 165 degrees Fahrenheit (dF) or greater prior to service to prevent the growth of food-borne pathogens and food-borne illness. Facility staff also failed to thaw meat in a manner to prevent the growth of food-borne pathogens and food-borne illness. The facility census was 42. 1. Review of the facility's handwashing policy dated 2017,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-16 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to refund resident funds within 30 days of discharge for six residents (Resident # 286, #287, #288, #289, #290 and #291). The facility census was 42. Review of the facility policies showed they did not have a policy for resident refunds after discharge. 1. Review of the facility's aging report, dated 9/15/22, showed the following residents had money in the facility's operating account: -Resident #286 was discharged on 5/21/20: with a balance of $763.35; -Resident #287 was discharged on 2/14/22: with a balance of $1681.80; -Resident #288 was discharged on 2/1/21: with a balance of $152.67; -Resident #289 was discharged on 3/5/21: with a balance of $152.55; -Resident #290 was discharge on [DATE]: with a balance of $976.38; -Resident #291 was discharged on 6/3/22: with a balance of $1,410.66. 2. During an interview on 9/16/22 at 11:30 A.M., the Business Office Manger (BOM) said he/she reviews the accounts receivable report with corporate staff every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-16 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to purchase a surety bond in an amount sufficient to assure security of all resident funds the facility holds. The facility census was 42. 1. Review of the resident's trust fund account for September 2021 through August 2022, showed an average monthly balance of $34,001.33, which requires a surety bond of $45,000.00. Further review showed the current ledger amount was $32,430.90. Review of the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) database, showed the facility has an approved non-cancelable Escrow Agreement Account in the amount of $40,000.00. During an interview on 9/16/22 at 10:30 A.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) said the administrator was responsible to ensure the bond amount was sufficient. He/She said after the previous administrator left and the new corporation took over, After change in staff, I guess no one really knew about it, I just figured it out when I was getting it together for you. During an interview on 9/16/22 at 11:00 A.M., the Administrator said it is the business office manager's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to include the triggered care areas for four residents (Resident #14, #17, #24 and #30). The facility census was 42. 1. Review of the facility's Care Planning- Interdisciplinary Team Policy, dated 2/2021, showed staff is directed to the following: -Every resident will be assessed using the Minimum Data Set (MDS) according to the guidelines set forth in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual; -To use this assessment data to develop a comprehensive Plan of Care (POC) for each resident that will assist a resident in achieving and maintaining the highest practical level of mental functioning, physical functioning, and wellbeing as possible; -Upon completion of comprehensive assessments (as defined by the RAI Manual), Care Area Assessment (CAA)s will be triggered to flag areas of concern that may need to be addressed in the POC for the resident. Each triggered CAA will be reviewed by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure the comprehensive care plans were updated for three residents (Resident #3, #21, and #489). The facility census was 42. 1. Review of the facility's Care Planning- Interdisciplinary Team Policy, dated 2/2021, showed staff is directed to the following: -Every resident will be assessed using the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, according to the guidelines set forth in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual; Use this assessment data to develop a comprehensive Plan of Care (POC) for each resident that will assist a resident in achieving and maintaining the highest practicable level of mental functioning, physical functioning, and well-being as possible; -The clinical record is also utilized to gather data including (but not limited to) nursing notes, medication/treatment records, lab results, physician notes, and demographic information; -The policy does not indicate the time frame POCs should be reviewed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to meet professional standards of care delivery when they failed to date and time Fentanyl patches for two residents (Residents #7 and #30), obtain a physician's order for the delivery of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure / Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP / BiPAP, a device that helps with breathing) for two residents (Resident #14 and #35), ensure correct delivery of respiratory medications for two residents (Residents #3 and #490), address multiple treatment refusals or inability to perform treatments for one resident (Resident #490) and follow physician's orders for two residents (Residents #3, and #10). The facility census was 42. 1. Review of the facility policies showed staff did not provide a policy for dating and timing of Fentanyl patches. Review of Missouri Certified Medication Technician Student Manual, 2008 Revision showed the procedure PREPARE, ADMINISTER, REPORT, AND RECORD TRANSDERMAL PATCHES included Label…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program with antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. The facility census was 42. 1. Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 2019 showed: -Develops and implements an ongoing infection prevention and control program (IPCP) to prevent, recognize and control the onset and spread of infection to the extent possible and reviews and updates the IPCP annually, based upon the facility assessment and as necessary. This would include revision of the IPCP as national standards change; -The Infection Preventionist (IP) will oversee the facility Antibiotic Stewardship Program; --Review of the use of antibiotics (including comparing prescribed antibiotics with available susceptibility reports) is a vital aspect of the infection prevention and control program; --Involve the consultant pharmacist with the oversight by identifying antibiotics prescribed for resistant organisms; --Track antibiotic use monthly and complete an antibiogram ( a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility staff failed to ensure medication regimens were free from unnecessary medications when staff failed to obtain an appropriate diagnosis for the use of psychotropic medications (a chemical substance that changes brain function and results in alterations in perception, mood, consciousness or behavior) for two residents (Residents #21 and #35). The facility census was 42. 1. Review of American Geriatrics Society (AGS), updated 2019, AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults showed: - Avoid antipsychotics for behavioral problems of dementia or delirium unless nonpharmacological options (e.g., behavioral interventions) have failed or are not possible and the older adult is threatening substantial harm to self or others; -Strength of recommendation - Strong. Review of the prescribing information for Zyprexa/Olanzapine (antipsychotic) showed: -Zyprexa is an atypical antipsychotic indicated for schizophrenia and Bipolar I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review facility staff failed to store and label medication in a safe and effective manor in one of two medication storage rooms and in one of two medication storage carts. The facility census was 42. 1. Review of the facility's Medication Storage Policy, dated [DATE], showed expired medication will be removed by the facility and destroyed or sent back to the pharmacy. Disposal of any medications prior to the expiration date will be required if contamination or decomposition is apparent. Observation on [DATE] at 10:15 A.M., showed the 100 hall medication storage room contained; - 6 100 tablet bottles of folic acid 400 mg with an expiration date of 8/22; - 2 100 tablet bottles of calcium 250 mg + D3 with an expiration date of 6/22; - 2 insta-Glucose 2 mg tubes with an expiration date of 6/22. Observation on [DATE] at 10:35 A.M., showed the 100 hall medication storage cart contained; - 1 loose tablet labeled Senna PSD 22; - 1 loose tablet labeled Ibu 44 291 brown; - 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to use proper hand hygiene and provide perineal care in a manner to reduce the risk of infection for two residents (Residents #7, and #34). Additionally, staff failed to provide wound care in a manner to reduce the risk of infection for two residents, (Residents #31, and #494). The facility census was 42. 1. Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Manual, dated 2019, showed the hand hygiene procedure referred to the CDC website for further information on appropriate hand hygiene. Review of the CDC website showed: -Multiple opportunities for hand hygiene may occur during a single care episode. Following are the clinical indications for hand hygiene: --Before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient; --Immediately after glove removal. 2. Review of Resident #7's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated resident assessment tool, dated 6/21/22 showed staff assessed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-01-16 · tag F0680 — widespreadEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. The facility census was 49. 1. Review of facility's policies showed staff did not provide a policy in regards to qualifications for the Activity Director position. 2. Review of the facility's Activities Designee job description, undated, showed the Activity Director must receive Activity Designee certification within six months of hire. 3. Review of the facility maintained personnel records showed the Activity Director with a hire date of 05/17/24. During an interview on 01/15/25 at 11:45 A.M., the Activity Director said he/she does not have his/her Activity Director certification. He/She said he/she has been the Activity Director Since June 2024 and states the Activity Director course has been talked about but he/she is not currently enrolled in any courses at this time. During an interview on 01/16/25 at 12:41 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said he/she was not aware the Activity Director did not have his/her Activity Director certification.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-01-16 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to protect residents' privacy when staff failed to provide privacy during perineal care for two residents (Resident #1 and # 9) out of two sampled residents. The facility's census was 49. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, dated October 2009, showed employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity, and each resident has the right to privacy and confidentiality. 2. Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment, dated 11/03/24 showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Dependent on staff for dressing, toileting hygiene, and personal hygiene. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 11/14/24, showed staff are directed to assist the resident with transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. Observation on 01/15/25 at 1:35 P.M., showed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A and Nursing Assistant (NA) B…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-09-16 · tag F0575 — widespreadPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to post in a form and manner accessible to residents, the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) hotline information (to report allegations of abuse and neglect), or a list of names, addresses, and phone numbers of the State Survey Agency (SA). The facility census was 42. 1. Review of the facility's admission package, Resident Grievance Procedure, showed; if at any time a resident or any person who believes that there has been a violation of a resident's rights concerning abuse, neglect or the misappropriation of a resident's property, the resident or third party is instructed to call the pertinent office listed on the Local Government Resources insert. A statement containing the rights of Resident will be provided to the Resident upon execution of this Agreement. Observations from 09/13/22 at 3:00 P.M. to 09/16/22 at 11:00 A.M., showed the facility did not post the name, address, and toll free telephone number for the Elder Abuse Hotline, in a prominent manner for residents or visitors. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-09-16 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to complete or post the required nurse staffing information in an area readily accessible to residents and visitors. The facility census was 42. 1. Review of the facility's Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers policy, dated February 2021, showed staff are directed to: -Post the staffing on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift; -List the licensed staff including Registered nurses (RN), Licensed practical nurses (LPN), Licensed vocational nurses (LVN), and Certified nurse aides (CNA); -Each staff member will be listed by first name only, the actual hours worked, and the total number of hours worked will be posted. Review of the Daily Staffing sheets, dated 09/13/22, 09/14/22, and 09/15/22, showed the sheets did not contain the following: -The total number and the actual hours worked by the licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift including RNs, LPNs, LVNs, and CNAs; -Staffing listed in a clear and readable format; -The staff members listed by first name…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-09-16 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to update a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies as required. The facility census was 42. 1. Review of the facility assessment showed the assessment has not been updated since 04/1/20. During an interview on 09/15/22 at 11:28 A.M., the administrator said he/she does not have an updated facility assessment and that he/she is responsible for updating it. He/she said that the facility assessment is supposed to determine the level of competency required for the staff with the facility assessment.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRISLEY PROPERTIES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2023 |
| MJZ INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2023 |
| NORTH STAR EQUITY GROUP LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2023 |
| REDBUD INVESTMENT GROUP LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2023 |
| SILVER MAPLE PROPERTIES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2023 |
| WILLIZA PROPERTIES | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2023 |
| LIGHT, LINDSEY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 07/15/2024 |
| BIGHAM, BROOKE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $314K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265521. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.