Sylvia G Thompson Residence Center, INC
3333 W Tenth Street, Sedalia, MO 65301 · Non profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (660) 826-2118 Medicaid only — no Medicare
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.6% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.5% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 4.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 6.5% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 18.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.0% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.8% | 25.6% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.3% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.8% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.7% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 30.5% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 46.2% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.52 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.56 | 2.33 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 114.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.00 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.08 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to properly assess two residents', (Resident #1 and #2) capacity to consent to sexual activity and failed to ensure residents with severe cognitive impairment remained free from sexual abuse when staff found Resident #2 holding Resident #1's hand to perform a sexual act. The facility census was 117. The administrator was notified on 3/22/24 at 5:09 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 3/19/24. The IJ was removed on 3/29/24 as confirmed by the surveyor's onsite verification. Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy, dated August 4, 2023, showed it is the policy of this facility to investigate any incident or allegation of suspected abuse, injury of unknown origin, neglect or misappropriation of resident's property. Our facility will not permit residents to be subjected to abuse by anyone, including staff members, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members, legal guardians,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide appropriate care and services per facility policy to maintain the highest practicable physical and psychosocial well-being for one resident (Resident #1) when staff failed to safely administer a warm pack for pain, which resulted in a burn injury to the resident's left arm and shoulder area. The facility census was 115.1. Review of the facility's Policy and Procedure for Using a Warm and Cool Pack, dated 08/2024, showed if a resident requests a warm or cool pack, one will be provided that will return to room temperature without intervention. This would consist of rice packs, gel packs, or warm/cool cloths that will return to room temperature on their own. Warm packs are not to be microwaved unless manufacturer recommends. Hot water may be utilized only out of facility faucets to ensure temperature is not too hot. Staff should check periodically to see if resident has relief from the issue that requires the use of the pack. 2. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-29 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure five nurse aides ((NA) NA A, NA B, NA C, NA D, and NA E) out of six sampled NA's, completed the nurse aid training program within four months of their facility hire date. The facility census was 116.1. Review of the facility provided policies did not contain a policy to direct staff on timeframe for the completion of nurse aide training program.2. Review of NA A's personnel file showed a hire date of 11/01/25. The file did not contain documentation NA A completed the nurse aide training program.During an interview on 04/29/26 at 2:42 P.M., NA A said he/she has worked as an NA since 2025. He/She said he/she is supposed to be done with the CNA class now but waiting on an email to be able to take the test. He/She said that he/she works the floor by himself/herself and performs resident cares.3. Review of NA B's personnel file showed a hire date of 10/31/25. The file did not contain documentation NA B completed the nurse aide training program.4. Review of NA C's personnel file showed a hire date of 10/31/25. The file…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-10-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to follow their Facility Assessment to ensure the facility staffed enough staff to meet the needs of the residents. Staff failed to provide a sufficient number of direct care staff members to ensure call lights were answered in timely manner. The facility census was 112. 1. Review of the facility assessment tool, dated 08/28/25, showed: -Average census of 117 residents;-Goal staffing is one to eight ratio for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), the day-to-day average is one to ten for CNAs;-Days: Five Registered Nurses (RNs), two Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), and 17 CNAs;-Evenings: One RN, one LPN, and 14 CNAs;-Nights: Two LPNs and eight CNAs;-Weekend days: One RN, one LPN, and other direct care hours remain the same.2. Review of the facility census sheet, dated 08/30/25, showed the facility census at 117.Review of the employee schedule, dated 08/30/25, showed: -Eight CNAs on evening shift;-Seven CNAs on night shift.3. Review of the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview facility staff failed to ensure two of three ice machines, used to supply ice to residents, drained through an air gap to prevent cross-contamination. Facility staff failed to ensure one ice machine was free of materials to prevent ice contamination. The facility census was 112.1. Observation on 10/08/25, during the Life Safety Code tour showed:-the ice machine located in the clean utility room contained two small white plastic tubes which drained from the rear of the ice machine into a larger white plastic floor drain and did not contain an air gap. Observation showed the white plastic above the ice storage bin contained a black speckled substance;-the nurse station 2 dining room ice machine contained a black drain hose which ran into a white plastic drain and did not contain an air gap.During an interview on 10/09/25 at 11:35 A.M., the Safety Coordinator said the facility's contracted vendor was responsible for cleaning the ice machines, but he/she did not know how often. The safety coordinator said maintenance staff were responsible for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to meet professional standards of care when they failed to document they administered treatments for three residents (Resident #46, #110, and #112) of 28 sampled resident treatments. The facility census was 112.1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Wound Care, revised October 2010, showed the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. The following information is be recorded in the resident's medical record:-The type of wound care given;-The date and time the wound care was given;-If the resident refused the treatment and the reason(s) why;-Staff are directed to notify the supervisor is the resident refuses the wound care. 2. Review of Resident #46's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 08/08/25, showed staff assessed the resident as:-Severe cognitive impairment;-Rejection of care not exhibited;-At risk of Ulcers/injuries;-Surgical wound.Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide a safe mechanical lift transfer for two residents (Resident #21 and #90) when staff failed to open the legs of the mechanical lift during transfers and failed to position the resident's wheelchair to prevent bumping the mechanical lift during the transfer. The facility census was 112. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents, dated July 2017, showed the following:-In order to protect the safety and well-being of staff and residents, and to promote quality care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents;-Staff responsible for direct resident care will be trained in the use of manual and mechanical lifting devices;-Staff will be observed for competency in using mechanical lifts and observed periodically for adherence to policies and procedures regarding use of equipment and safe lifting techniques;-Safe lifting and movement of residents is part of an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-09 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to assess residents for the use of bed rails on a quarterly basis for six residents (Resident #2, #3, #10, #11, #29, and #112) of 28 sampled residents. The facility census was 112. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Safety and Bed Rails, dated August 2022, showed the use of bed rails is prohibited unless the criteria for use of bed rails have been met, including attempts to use alternatives, interdisciplinary evaluation, and resident assessment.2. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly minimum data (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 09/26/25, showed staff assessed the resident as follows:-Severe cognitive impairment;-Required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting, showering, personal hygiene; -Bed rails not used as a restraint in bed.Review of the resident's medical record showed the record did not contain a quarterly side rail assessment.Observation on 10/07/25 at 1:20 P.M., showed the resident in bed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-09 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure Nurse Aide's ((NA) NA H, NA J, NA P, NA Q, and NA S) of 24 completed the nurse aide training program within four months of his/her employment in the facility. The census was 112.1.Review of the facility's Nurse Aide Qualifications and Training Requirements policy, revised 08/2022, showed nursing assistants failing to successfully complete the required training program within the first four (4) months of their date of employment may be terminated from employment or may be reassigned to non-nursing related services.2. Review of NA H's CNA report, showed a hire date of 03/24/25. Review showed the NA's file did not contain documentation the NA completed a nurse aide training program.3 Review of NA J's CNA report, showed a hire date of 04/28/25. Review showed the NA's file did not contain documentation the NA completed a nurse aide training program.During an interview on 10/17/25 at 10:40 A.M., NA J said he/she started back with the facility in April. He/She has taken the classes online through the facility but has yet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (5%) out of 25 opportunities observed, nine errors occurred, resulting in a 36% error rate, which affected two residents (Resident #48 and #62) out of seven sampled residents. The facility's census was 112.1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, revised April 2019, showed staff: -Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed;-Medications are administered within one hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal orders);-The individual administering the medication checks the label THREE times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication;-Medication errors are documented, reported, and reviewed by the QAPI committee to inform process changes and or the need for additional staff training.Review of the facility's Medication Pass times, provided by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to label and store medications in a safe and effective manner in one of two sampled medication storage rooms and one of two sampled medication carts. Staff failed to ensure medications were properly stored during medication administration to residents. The facility census was 112.1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medication, revised 11/2020, showed:-The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner;-Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, or incorrect labels are returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing;-Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed;-Schedule II-V (two to five) controlled medications are stored in separately locked, permanently affixed compartments.Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, revised 04/2019, showed when opening a multi-dose container, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to review and revise the plan of care to address individualized physical and functional care needs for three residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3) out of four sampled residents. The facility's census was 115.1. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plans Policy, revised 03/2022, showed a comprehensive, person-centered care plan will include measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the residents' condition change. Review showed the policy did not address timeframes for revising a resident's care plan after an injury or change in functional care needs. 2. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment, dated 05/29/25, showed staff assessed the resident as cognitively intact, occasional pain, and did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 18 citations
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-22 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to electronically submit to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), a complete and accurate direct care staffing information to the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) data from July 1, 2024 through September 30, 2024. The facility census was 116. 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Reporting Direct Staffing Information (Payroll-Based Journal), Revised August 2022, showed: -Complete and accurate direct care staffing information is reported electronically to CMS through the PBJ system in a uniform format specified by CMS; -Direct care staffing information is submitted on the schedule specified by CMS, but no less frequently than quarterly; -Staffing information is collected daily and reported for each fiscal quarter no later than 45 days after the end of the reporting quarter. Dates are as follows: --Fiscal Quarter 1: Date Range October 1-December 31: submission deadline February 14; --Fiscal Quarter 2: Date Range January 1-March 31: submission deadline May 15; --Fiscal Quarter 3: Date Range April 1-June 30:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to verify medications to the Medication Administrator Record (MAR) for two (Resident #90 and #50) of three sampled residents. The facility census was 116. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, revised April 2019, showed: -Medications are administered according to prescriber orders; -Verify the resident's identity before giving medication by checking photo attached to the medical record; -Check the medication three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dose, right time, and right route of administration before giving the medication; -The individual administering the medication initials the MAR after giving each medication. 2. Observation on 01/21/25 at 12:00 P.M., showed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C drew up Novolin Insulin (a medication used to control blood sugars) for Resident #90 and did not check the MAR to ensure he/she administered the proper dosage. Observation showed LPN C looked at a cheat sheet that hung on the medication room cabinet to know…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide safe mechanical transfers for two residents (Resident #51, and #39). Facility staff failed to safely store hazardous materials in three shower rooms and one storage area and failed to ensure medications were safely stored. The facility census was 116. 1. Review of the facility's Using a Mechanical Lifting Machine policy, dated July 2017, showed staff were directed: -Lift design and operation vary across manufacturers. Staff must be trained and demonstrate competency using the specific machines or devices utilized in the facility; -Clear an unobstructed path for the lift machine. Review of the mechanical lift operating instructions, dated 2018, showed the legs of the lift must be opened to the widest position when transferring a resident. 2. Review of Resident #51's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 1127/24, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Severe Cognitive impairment; -Transfer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (%). Out of 41 opportunities observed, three errors occurred, resulting in a 7.32% error rate, which affected two residents (Resident #45, and #5) out of 10 sampled residents. The facility census was 116. Review of the American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology recommendations titled Tips for Administering Eye Drops, dated 08/2010, showed close the eyelids and apply pressure for one to two minutes over the point where the eyelid meets the nose (nasolacrimal duct) after administering eye drops. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, revised 04/2019, showed: -Medications are administered according to prescriber orders; -Medication errors are documented, reported, and reviewed by the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) team; -The individual administering the medications: 2. Review of Resident #45 Physician's Order Sheet (POS), dated 01/21/24, showed: -Memantine (a medication for dementia) 10 milligrams…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to store medications in a safe and effective manner in two of two medication rooms and failed to discard expired medications in one two medication carts. The Facility census was 116. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Controlled Drug Policy and Procedure, revised 08/2024, showed a separate compartment for controlled drugs is provided in a locked cabinet inside the medication room or locked medication cart. The compartment has a special lock and key, and must be kept locked at all times. 2. Observation on 01/21/25 at 10:00 A.M., showed the Nurse's station one's medication room contained an unlocked refrigerator. Observation showed two opened bottles of liquid Ativan (a controlled drug). Observation showed the unlocked narcotic cabinet contained one opened four opened bottles of liquid morphine. Observation on 01/21/25 at 11:59 A.M., showed (Licensed Practical Nurse) LPN C unlocked the nurses's station one medication room, propped the door open and walked away from the open medication room. Observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-22 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet to meet their daily nutritional and special dietary needs, when staff failed to provide portions as directed in standardized recipes. This affected all residents who received their meals from the facility's kitchen. The facility census was 116. 1. Review of the facility's standardized menu for 01/20/25 (Week 4 - Day 23), showed staff were directed to serve the residents eight ounces of beef goulash and eight ounces of tossed salad. Observation on 01/20/25 at 12:52 P.M., showed [NAME] M served the residents one, #6 (5.33 ounces) scoop of goulash (2.66 ounces less than directed) and a four-ounce spoodle of salad (four ounces less than directed). Observation on 1/20/25 at 1:08 P.M., showed Dietary Aide (DA) O served a #6 scoop of goulash (2.66 ounces less than directed and pre-made salads from the kitchen which were four ounces (four ounces less than directed). During an interview on 01/20/25 at 12:52 P.M., [NAME] M said he/she was the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to follow infection control practices during medication administration for five (Resident #109, #45, #110, #5, & #120) out of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 116. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, revised 04/2019, showed staff are directed to follow facility infection control procedures (hand washing, antiseptic technique, gloves, etc.) for the administration of medications. Review of the facility's policy titled Handwashing and Hand Hygiene, revised 08/2019, showed: -All staff shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other staff, resident, or visitors; -Use an alcohol-based had rub for the following situations; -Before and after coming in contact with a resident; -Before preparing or handling medications; -After contact with objects and/or medical equipment in the vicinity of the resident; -After removing gloves. 2. Observation on 01/21/25 at 7:45 A.M., showed Certified Medication Technician (CMT) D…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to report to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) two allegations of resident abuse with three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #4) out of four sampled residents within the required two hour timeframe. The facility census was 120. 1. Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy, dated August 4, 2023, showed it is the policy of the facility to investigate any incident or allegation of suspected abuse, injury of unknown origin, neglect or misappropriation of resident's property. The facility will not permit residents to be subjected to abuse by anyone, to include staff members, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff of other agencies that serve the resident, family members, legal guardians, sponsors, friend, or other individuals. Review of the facility's Internal investigations policy, dated December 2021, showed staff are directed to investigate and include documentation of detailed descriptions of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to thoroughly investigate two allegations of resident abuse with three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #4). The facility census was 120. 1. Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy, dated August 4, 2023, showed it is the policy of the facility to investigate any incident or allegation of suspected abuse, injury of unknown origin, neglect or misappropriation of resident's property. The facility will not permit residents to be subjected to abuse by anyone, to include staff members, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff of other agencies that serve the resident, family members, legal guardians, sponsors, friend, or other individuals. Review of the facility's internal investigations policy, dated December 2021, showed staff are directed to investigate and include documentation of detailed descriptions of the suspected violation, details of the investigative process, copies of the notes and interviews, corrective actions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to develop interventions for comprehensive care plans for four residents (Residents #1, #2, #3 and #4) out of four sampled residents. 1. Review of the facility's Care plan policy, revised November 2019, showed staff are directed to: -Define the problems: identify the behavioral implications of the problem; -Identify the relationships between risk factors, triggers, and problems; -Distinguish between causes and consequences; -Look for common causes of multiple issues; -Determine whether the problem needs interventions, -Design interventions that address causes not symptoms; -Include specific interventions, including recommendations for monitoring and follow ups. Review of the facility's internal investigations policy, dated December 2021, showed staff are directed to include documentation of an investigation with any measures needed to prevent similar violations while remedies are underway, and follow up or monitoring that will be necessary to maintain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to complete neurological checks for 72 hours for two of four sampled residents (Resident #1 and #3) who had unwitnessed falls, as directed by the facility policy. The facility census was 117. 1. Review of the facility's Falls and Fall Risk, Managing Policy, undated, showed a fall defined as unintentionally coming to rest on the ground, floor, or other lower level, but not as a result of an overwhelming external force. Unless there is evidence suggesting otherwise, when a resident is found on the floor, a fall is considered to have occurred. If a resident has a fall or other accident or incident the staff are expected to assess if the resident hit their head. If so, neurological checks will be initiated at the time of the fall, every 15 minutes for one hour, every 30 minutes for one hour, and then every shift for three days. The staff will monitor and document each resident's response to interventions intended to reduce falling or the risks of falling.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene as often as necessary using approved techniques to prevent cross-contamination. The facility census was 117. 1. Review of the facility's Dietary Services Preventing Foodborne Illness-Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices policy, dated November 2022, showed: -Food and nutrition services employees follow appropriate hygiene and sanitary procedures to prevent the spread of foodborne illness; -Employees must wash their hands: *after personal body functions (i.e., toileting, blowing/wiping nose, coughing, sneezing, etc.); *whenever entering or re-entering the kitchen; *before coming in contact with any food surfaces; *after handling soiled equipment or utensils; *during food preparation, as often as necessary to remove soil and contamination and to prevent cross-contamination when changing tasks; and/or *after engaging in other activities that contaminate the hands; -Antimicrobial hand get can be used per recommendation between hand washing unless handling raw meat; -Gloves are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to implement appropriate infection control procedures to prevent the spread of bacteria or other infectious causing contaminants when staff failed to screen six of 10 sampled newly hired staff (Registered Nurse (RN) A, RN B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C, Certified Medication Technician (CMT) D, CMT E and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) F) for tuberculosis (TB), in accordance with the facility policy. The facility census was 117. 1. Review of the facility's policy, titled Employee Screening for Tuberculosis, dated March 2021, showed staff were directed to do the following: -All employees are screened for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and active tuberculosis (TB) disease, using tuberculin skin test (TST) or interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) and symptom screening prior to beginning employment; -Each newly hired employee is screened for LTBI and active TB disease after an employment offer has been made, but prior to the employee's duty assignment; -Screening includes a baseline test for LTBI using either a TST or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to include a requirement to check the Nurse Assistant (NA) Registry in the facility ' s policy to ensure they did not have a Federal Indicator (a marker given by the federal government to individuals who have committed abuse and/or neglect) and failed to implement their written policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property when the staff failed to request a criminal background check (CBC) prior to contact with residents for three of 10 new hired staff (RN A, RN B and Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) F). The facility census was 117. 1. Review of the facility's Licensure, Certification, and Registration of Personnel policy, dated April 2007, showed Our facility conducts employment background screening checks, reference checks, license verifications and criminal conviction investigation checks in accordance with federal and state laws. Review showed the policy did not direct staff to conduct a check of the NA Registry. 2. During an interview on 11/02/23 at 10:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure five residents (Residents #24, #70. #76, #89, #373), who were unable to complete their own activities of daily living (ADLs) (showering/bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene), received the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene. The facility census was 117. 1. Review of the policies provided by the facility showed no policy for ADLs. 2. Review of Resident #24's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 08/30/23, showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Required moderate assistance from staff for eating, toilet hygiene and bathing; -Occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Diagnoses of dementia (progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change, resulting from organic disease of the brain), stroke and Hemiplegia (paralysis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure the residents' environment remained free of accident hazards when they failed to properly propel two residents (Resident's #51 and #80) in wheelchairs. The facility census was 117. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Assistive Devices and Equipment, dated January 2020, showed staff were directed to do the following: -Certain devices and equipment that assist with resident mobility, safety and independence are provided for residents. These may include (but are no limited to) mobility devices (wheelchairs, walkers and canes); -Staff and volunteers are trained and demonstrate competency on the use of devices and equipment prior to assisting or supervising residents; -The following factors are addressed to the extent possible to decrease the risk of avoidable accidents associated with devices and equipment. Staff are required to demonstrate competency on the use of devices and equipment and are available to assist and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to document of the type of pneumocococcal (lung inflammation caused by bacterial or viral infection) vaccine or date the resident received the pneumococcal vaccine for one resident (Resident #28) and failed to offer two residents (Resident #67 and #84) a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. The facility census was 117. 1. Review of the facility's policy, titled Pneumococcal Vaccine, dated March, 2022, showed staff were directed to do the following: -All residents are offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections; -Prior to or upon admission, residents are assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, are offered the vaccine series within thirty (30) days of admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated or the resident has already been vaccinated; -Assessments of pneumococcal vaccination status are conducted within five (5) working days of the resident's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #103) remained free from physical abuse when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) CC placed his/her arms around the resident and forced the resident to walk from the common area to his/her room. The facility census was 117. The administrator was notified on 11/02/2023 of past Non-Compliance which occurred on 10/26/23. On 10/26/23 CNA CC placed his/her arms around Resident #103 and carried the resident from the common area to his/her room. Upon discovery, the Administrator watched the video, then contacted the resident's responsible party, physician and the Adult Abuse and Neglect Hotline, interviewed staff, including CNA CC, and resident's and conducted an in-service with the memory care staff members. CNA CC was terminated on 10/27/23. Staff corrected the deficient practice on 10/28/23. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Reporting and Investigation, undated, showed the facility will not permit residents to be subjected to abuse by anyone, including staff members, other residents,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in MO
CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 26A378. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-10-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.