Maranatha Village, INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 126 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 101.7 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.82 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed provide care per standards of practice to all residents when staff failed to document timely and complete assessments and monitoring, and failed to notify the physician in a timely fashion for one resident (Resident #1) after the reisdent fell and when the resident began having low blood oxygen readings. The facility census was 102 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Change in Resident's Condition or Status, revised on 02/2021, showed the following: -The facility promptly notifies the resident, his/her attending physician, and the resident's representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and or status; -The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or on call physician when there is significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition, need to alter the resident's medical treatment; -The nurse will record in the resident's medical record information relative to the changes in medical/mental condition/status. Review of the facility's current…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect all residents from misappropriation of property when a facility staff member (Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A) received multiple checks from one resident's (Resident #1's) checking account after expressing his/her financial need to the resident. The facility census was 101. Review of the facility policy titled, Identifying Exploitation, Theft and Misappropriation of Resident Property, dated April 2021, showed the following: -Exploitation, theft, and misappropriation of resident property are strictly prohibited; -Exploitation means taking advantage of a resident for personal gain, through the use of manipulation, intimidation, threats or coercion; -Misappropriation of resident property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet showed: -admission date of 08/26/23; -Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (disease that affects the central nervous system and disrupts the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-03 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation was present in the medical record to support any discharge when staff failed to document to the resident's medical records the specific needs the facility could not meet, the attempts the facility made to meet those needs, and the services available at the receiving facility to meet the need, including documentation from the physician, for one resident (Resident #1) who was issued a facility initiated discharge notice. The facility's census was 87. Review of a facility policy titled Transfer or Discharge, Facility-Initiated, revised October 2022, showed the following: -Once admitted to the facility, residents have the right to remain in the facility; -Facility-initiated discharges must meet specific criteria and require resident/representative notification and orientation, and documentation as specified in this policy; -A resident will not be discharged unless the discharge is necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in facility; -A resident's declination of treatment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff treated all residents in a dignified fashion when one staff member (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B) made rude and degrading comments during a procedure to replace an indwelling (Foley) catheter (sterile tube inserted to drain the bladder) for one resident (Resident #1). A sample of eight residents with catheters was reviewed. The facility census was 94. Review of the facility policy entitled Resident Rights, revised February 2021, showed the following: -Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity; -All residents of the facility have the right to a dignified existence; -Orientation and in-service training programs are conducted quarterly to assist employees in understanding the residents' rights. Review of the facility policy entitled Dignity, revised February 2021, showed the following: -Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem; -Residents are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect food from possible contamination at all times in accordance with professional standards of practice when staff failed to wear hairnets in the kitchen, failed to store the ice scoop outside of the ice container, and failed to complete proper handwashing during meal service/prep. The facility census was 85. 1. Observations on 04/16/24, from 9:15 A.M. to 10:20 A.M., showed the following: -In the serving kitchen, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 1 was inside the kitchen, scooping ice into a cooler without wearing a hairnet. At the time of the observation, food preparation was in process. The Dietary Manager (DM) told CNA 1 that he/she needed to have a hairnet on anytime he/she entered the kitchen. CNA 1 replied I know I do. Observation on 04/19/24, at 10:00 A.M., showed the following: -The Maintenance Director (MD) entered the kitchen without a hairnet, walked past the staff slicing meat for the residents' lunch, and proceeded to the sink. Maintenance Worker (MW) 5 directed the MD to put on a hairnet. The MD…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain their infection prevention program to reduce the likelihood of a legionella (the bacterium which causes legionnaires' disease (a severe form of pneumonia) which can grow in areas with stagnant water) in the water when the facility failed to follow their water management program by not completing the preventative steps outlined and when the facility failed to ensure staff were educated regarding the water management program. The facility census was 85. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Water Management Program, undated, showed the following: -Specific measures used to control the introduction and/or spread of Legionella; -The control limits or parameters that are acceptable and that are monitored; -A diagram of where control measures are applied; -A system to monitor control limits and the effectiveness of control measures; -a plan for when control limits are not met and/or control measures are not effective; -Documentation of the program. Review of an undated document, provided by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-19 · tag F0625 — pattern
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or responsible party (RP) information regarding a Bed Hold for three residents (Resident #30, #50, and #67) of a sample of three residents reviewed for hospitalizations of 33 sampled residents. The facility census was 85. Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Hold Policy, undated, showed the following: -The resident and/or responsible party will be held responsible for 75% of the daily room rate should they wish to reserve their room while in the hospital; -The nursing home has an obligation to inform the resident or the responsible person that is paying them to hold a bed is voluntary; -When a resident is transferred to a hospital, the nursing home is required both by federal statute and by federal regulation, to readmit the resident immediately upon the first availability of a bed in a semiprivate room should the resident choose not to do a bed hold. Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed-Holds and Returns, revised…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and update comprehensive care plan to ensure their accuracy when staff failed to care plan the use of usage for four residents (Resident #9, #30, #45, and #54) and failed to care plan anticoagulant (medicines that help prevent blood clots) usage for one resident (Resident #75). The facility census was 85. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022, showed the following: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; -The comprehensive, person-centered care plan includes measurable objectives and timeframes; describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, including services that would otherwise be provided for the above, but are not provided due to the resident exercising his or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect the dignity of all residents when the facility failed to respect one resident's (Resident #50) preference to help with nighttime care and when staff failed to protect one resident's (Resident #39) health information from public viewing. A sample of 33 residents was reviewed in a home with a census of 85. Review of the facility's policy titled, Dignity, dated 02/21, showed the following: -Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem; -Residents are treated with dignity, and respect at all times; -The facility culture supports dignity and respect for residents by honoring resident goals, choices, preferences, values, and beliefs. This begins with the initial admission and continues throughout the resident's facility stay; -Staff protect confidential clinical information. The resident's clinical status or care needs are not openly posted in the resident's room unless…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed provide respiratory care per standards of practice when staff did not have physician orders for oxygen usage for two residents (Residents #37 and #9). A sample of residents was reviewed in a facility with a census of 85. Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, dated October 2010, showed the following: -The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration; -Verify there is a physician's order for this procedure; -Review the physician's order or facility protocol for oxygen administration. 1. Review of Resident 37's admission Record located in the Profile tab of the EMR, showed the following: -admission date of 01/23/24; -Diagnoses included of pleural effusion (the buildup of excess fluid between the layers of the pleura outside the lungs), unspecified fibrillation (a heart condition that causes an irregular and often abnormally fast heart rate), heart disease and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,335 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $16,335 — penalty dated 2026-05-04
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-06-13 for 5 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO